Bifidobacterium longum

The gut microbiota has emerged as a critical determinant of antitumor immunity and a potential modulator of responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Although pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that specific bacterial taxa may influence both efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the magnitude and consistency of these associations remain unclear. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through March 2025. Eligible studies evaluated baseline gut microbiota composition, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotic/prebiotic interventions, or antibiotic exposure in cancer patients treated with ICIs. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and odds ratios (ORs) for response rates and irAEs, were estimated using random-effects models. Across 38 studies involving 5,642 patients were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that enrichment of Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium longum and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was significantly associated with improved OS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.76) and PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.83). Conversely, antibiotic exposure before or during ICI treatment was associated with worse OS (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.45-2.34). Patients undergoing FMT from responders exhibited higher objective response rates (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.48-5.73). Microbiota diversity indices were consistently higher in responders than in non-responders. Collectively, gut microbiota composition and its modulation significantly impact the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity profile of ICIs. These findings highlight the translational potential of microbiome-based biomarkers and interventions in optimizing immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic inflammation is a hallmark of diabetes mellitus and contributes to insulin resistance and disease progression. Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota and their metabolites, particularly short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), play a crucial role in modulating immune responses. Probiotics and synbiotics are increasingly explored for their potential to mitigate inflammation via microbiota-targeted mechanisms. This study aims to evaluate the effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on inflammatory markers and microbial metabolites in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes through meta-analytical techniques. METHODS: A total of 46 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 3,580 diabetic patients were included following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to assess changes in inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10) and SCFA levels (butyrate, propionate, acetate). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to identify effect modifiers such as intervention duration, formulation type (probiotic vs. synbiotic), and SCFA concentrations. RESULTS: Probiotic/synbiotic interventions led to significant reductions in CRP (SMD = -0.54), IL-6 (SMD = -0.41), and TNF-α (SMD = -0.48), along with an increase in IL-10 (SMD = +0.38). SCFA levels rose significantly, with butyrate showing the strongest effect (SMD = +0.46). Meta-regression revealed that butyrate levels, synbiotic use, and intervention duration ≥8 weeks were strong predictors of anti-inflammatory efficacy. Multi-strain and synbiotic interventions were more effective than single-strain or probiotic-only formulations. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings, and publication bias was minimal. DISCUSSION: These findings support the adjunctive use of targeted, SCFA-oriented probiotic formulations (e.g., Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium longum with inulin/FOS, ≥10^9-10^10 CFU/day) to mitigate metabolic inflammation alongside standard care. Strain- and dose-standardized RCTs should confirm impacts on glycemic and cardiometabolic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The use of probiotics as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is gaining attention, with recent studies indicating that certain probiotics or combinations may have mental health benefits for patients with IBS. AIMS: To systematically review and meta-analyze, using network meta-analysis (NWM), the comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential on quality of life, depression, and anxiety in patients with IBS. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed, using a Bayesian NWM, to compare the performance of probiotics with mental health benefits in IBS treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using surfaces under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values. RESULTS: The analysis included 3154 participants assigned to nine different treatments: Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomyces, Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, Lactobacillus plantarum, probiotic combinations, and placebo. B. longum and probiotic combinations were found to be significantly more effective than placebo. In terms of improving quality of life (QoL), B. longum was the most effective (SUCRA = 89.7%), while L. plantarum was the least effective (SUCRA = 14.9%). For alleviating depression and anxiety, the combination of probiotics (SUCRA = 95.6%) and L. acidophilus (SUCRA = 74.2%) showed the best results, respectively. CONCLUSION: Some probiotics or combinations may offer benefits for patients with IBS in improving QoL, depression, and anxiety; however, as this is a developing field, additional research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, and specific strains that may be advantageous. More high-quality RCTs are needed to substantiate these therapeutic possibilities.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection increases the risks of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer diseases, and the incidence of gastric cancer. However, antibiotic resistance and adverse effects led to the emergence of alternative treatments such as probiotics supplementation. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of incorporating probiotics into the various eradication regimens for H. pylori. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from inception to May 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing standard therapy (triple or quadrable therapy). for H. pylori with or without probiotic supplementation. Dichotomous data was reported using an odds ratio (OR) for intention-to-treat (ITT) and risk ratios (RR) for side effects with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: We included 91 RCTs involving 13,680 patients. Adding probiotics to standard treatment was associated with a higher H. pylori eradication rate in the ITT analysis (78.75 % vs 62.43 %, OR = 1.62, 95 % CI: 1.41 to 1.87, P < 0.0001), and per-protocol (PP) analysis (80.33 % vs 72.63 %, OR = 1.60, 95 % CI: 1.34 to 1.91, P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, dyspepsia, gastric ulcer, and peptic ulcer were comparable in both groups. The probiotics group was associated with significantly fewer side effects including, abdominal pain (RR = 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.54 to 0.86), bad taste (RR = 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.78), diarrhea (RR = 0.49, 95 % CI: 0.40 to 0.61), epigastric pain/bloating (RR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.65 to 0.88), headache/dizziness (RR = 0.46, 95 % CI: 0.29 to 0.74), (RR = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.55 to 0.77), or nausea/vomiting (RR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.56 to 0.83). The network meta-analysis showed that, compared to the placebo, Bifidobacterium longum had the highest efficacy in eradicating H. pylori (ITT: 81.06 % vs 64.88 %, PP: 88 % vs 75.71 %) (OR = 2.52, 95 % CI: 1.18 to 5.49). CONCLUSION: Adding probiotics to standard H. pylori therapy not only increased the rate of eradication but also reduced some of the adverse reactions throughout therapy, particularly nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, epigastric pain/bl

The literature regarding the role of probiotics in critically ill patients who have undergone mechanical ventilation (MV) is unclear; therefore, this umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to clarify the effects of probiotics on the clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients. The Scopus, PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar online databases were searched up to February 2023. All meta-analyses evaluating the impact of probiotics in patients under MV were considered eligible. The assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Data were pooled using the random-effects approach. Thirty meta-analyses and nine clinical outcomes were re-analyzed. Probiotics significantly decreased ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence, nosocomial infections, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, ICU mortality, hospital mortality, MV duration, duration of antibiotic use, and diarrhea. The obtained results of the current umbrella meta-analysis indicate that probiotic administration could be considered an adjunct therapy for critically ill patients; however, no specific probiotic treatment regimen can be recommended due to the diverse probiotics used in the included meta-analyses. The following microorganisms were used at various doses and combinations throughout the studies: Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, L. acidophilus, L. delbrueckii, L. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium longum, B. breve, B. salivarius, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactococcus raffinolactis, B. infantis, B. bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, L. lactis, B. lactis, Saccharomyces boulardii, L. rhamnosus GG, L. johnsonii, L. casei, S. faecalis, Clostridium butyricum, Bacillus mesentericus, L. sporogenes, S. boulardii, L. paracasei, B. subtilis, and Enterococcus faecium.

BACKGROUND: Bifidobacterium infantis has special abilities to utilise human milk oligosaccharides. Hence we hypothesised that probiotic supplements containing B. infantis may confer greater benefits to preterm infants than probiotic supplements without B. infantis. METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted according to standard guidelines. We selected RCTs evaluating probiotics compared to placebo or no treatment in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Probiotic effects on Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), Late Onset Sepsis (LOS) and Mortality were analysed separately for RCTs in which the supplemented probiotic product contained B. infantis and those that did not contain B. infantis. RESULTS: 67 RCTs were included (n = 14,606), of which 16 used probiotics containing B. infantis (Subgroup A) and 51 RCTs did not (Subgroup B) Meta-analysis of all RCTs indicated that probiotics reduced the risk of NEC, LOS, and mortality. The subgroup meta-analysis demonstrated greater reduction in the incidence of NEC in subgroup A than subgroup B [(relative risk in subgroup A: 0.38; 95% CI, 0.27-0.55) versus (0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81) in subgroup B; p value for subgroup difference: 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide indirect evidence that probiotic supplements that include B. infantis may be more beneficial for preterm infants. Well-designed RCTs are necessary to confirm these findings. IMPACT: Evidence is emerging that beneficial effects of probiotics are species and strain specific. This systematic review analyses if B. infantis supplementation provides an advantage to preterm infants. This is the first systematic review evaluating the effects of probiotics containing B. infantis in preterm infants. The results of this systematic review provides indirect evidence that probiotics that include B. infantis may be more beneficial for preterm infants. These results will help in guiding future research and clinical practice for using B. infantis as a probiotic in preterm infants. © 2023. Crown.

155. Nutrients. 2021 Apr 25;13(5):1461. doi: 10.3390/nu13051461. Can Mixed Strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Reduce Eczema in Infants under Three Years of Age? A Meta-Analysis. Sun M(1), Luo J(1), Liu H(1), Xi Y(1), Lin Q(1). Author information: (1)Department of Nutrition Science and Food Hygiene, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, 110 Xiangya Rd., Changsha 410078, China. (1) Background: Whether early supplementation of probiotics to improve intestinal flora can effectively prevent eczema remains a controversial issue. We aimed to investigate the effect of a mixed strain of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium on eczema in infants under three years old at present; (2) Methods: We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, as well as National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WeiPu (VIP), and WanFang Data (WanFang) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics in the prevention of eczema in infants without language restriction. The main outcome was eczema incidence, while adverse events during the intervention constituted the secondary outcome. The random-/fixed-effects model was utilized to calculate the combined relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The methodological quality of the study was evaluated using the Cochrane "bias risk" tool. According to the initial intervention time, subgroup analysis was carried out, follow-up time, family history, etc.; (3) Results: Nine articles were selected (2093 infants). The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium mixed strain could prevent eczema in infants under three years of age compared to the placebo (RR = 0.60; I2 = 67%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the mixture of two probiotic strains had preventive effects on both infants with positive (RR = 0.53; I2 = 52%; p < 0.001) and negative (RR = 0.69; I2 = 62%; p = 0.02) family history; The follow-up time for ≤12 months (RR = 0.65; I2 = 12%; p = 0.01) and 12-24 months (RR = 0.60; I2 = 79%; p = 0.003), daily dose of probiotics ≤ 1 × 109 and > 1 × 109 colony forming units all can be effective (p < 0.01); Compared with the intervention of infants alone (RR = 0.63; I2 = 63%; p = 0.29),

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is the most common chronic skin disease affecting the pediatric population. Probiotics have been proposed to be effective in preventing the development of pediatric atopic dermatitis. Although studies show promise for the use of probiotics, the evidence is still inconclusive due to significant heterogeneity and imprecision. OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative effectiveness of the different types of probiotic strains in preventing the development of atopic dermatitis among pediatric patients. METHODOLOGY: A systematic search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, TRIP Database, and Centre for Research and Dissemination was conducted. Manual search of the reference lists and search for unpublished articles were also done. All randomized controlled trials available from inception until April 12, 2020, on the use of probiotics in the prevention of atopic dermatitis among children were included. The comparator groups considered are other probiotic strains and placebo. The primary outcome of interest was the development of atopic dermatitis. Two authors independently searched for articles, screened the articles for inclusion, appraised the articles using the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2, and extracted the data. In case of disagreement, the two authors discussed the source of disagreement until consensus was reached. If consensus was not reached, an independent third party reviewer was consulted. Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 14 software. The ranking probabilities and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were obtained to determine ranking of the different probiotic strains based on efficacy and safety data. RESULTS: We included 21 original studies represented by 35 records and a total of 5406 children with atopic dermatitis as diagnosed by clinicians or fulfillment of validated diagnostic criteria. All studies were randomized placebo-controlled trials. The top 3 probiotic preparations in terms of efficacy in reducing the risk of atopic dermatitis are Mix8 (Lactobacillus paracasei ST11, Bifidobacterium longum BL999), LP (Lactobacillus paracasei ssp paracasei F19) and Mix3 (Lactobacillus

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, in which the pathogenesis is believed to be partly influenced by the gut microbiome. Probiotics can be used to manipulate the microbiome and have therefore been considered as a potential therapy for CD. There is some evidence that probiotics benefit other gastrointestinal conditions, such as irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis, but their efficacy in CD is unclear. This is the first update of a Cochrane Review previously published in 2008. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the induction of remission in CD. SEARCH METHODS: The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE (from inception to 6 July 2020), Embase (from inception to 6 July 2020), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane IBD Review Group Specialised Trials Register, World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared probiotics with placebo or any other non-probiotic intervention for the induction of remission in CD were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. The primary outcome was clinical remission. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: There were two studies that met criteria for inclusion. One study from Germany had 11 adult participants with mild-to-moderate CD, who were treated with a one-week course of corticosteroids and antibiotics (ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily and metronidazole 250 mg three times a day), followed by randomised assignment to Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG (two billion colony-forming units per day) or corn starch placebo. The other study from the United Kingdom (UK) had 35 adult participants with active CD (CDAI score of 150 to 450) randomised to receive a synbiotic treatment (comprised of freeze-dried Bifidobacterium longum and a commercial product) or placebo. The overall risk of bias

BACKGROUND: The current evidence on the use of probiotics in treating atopic dermatitis is inconclusive. This study determined the comparative effectiveness of the different types of probiotic strains in treating pediatric atopic dermatitis. METHODOLOGY: Systematic and manual search for all randomized controlled trials available from inception until January 31, 2020, was done. Two independent authors conducted the search, screening, appraisal, and data abstraction. Network meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 14 software. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies involving 28 different probiotic strains were included. The top three ranked probiotic strains in terms of efficacy are Mix1 (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis CECT 8145, Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347, and Lactobacillus casei CECT 9104); Lactobacillus casei DN-114001; and Mix6 (Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus salivarius). Compared with placebo, Mix1 reduces atopic dermatitis symptoms with high certainty evidence (SMD -1.94, 95% CI -2.65 to -1.24; 47 participants). Mix6 compared with placebo probably reduces atopic dermatitis symptoms based on moderate certainty evidence (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -1.50 to -0.20; 40 participants). Lactobacillus casei DN-114001 compared with placebo may reduce atopic dermatitis symptoms based on low certainty evidence (SMD -1.35, 95% CI -2.04 to -0.65). In terms of safety, the highest ranked strain is Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003, while the lowest ranked strain is Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. CONCLUSION: Certain probiotic preparations show benefit in reducing allergic symptoms in pediatric atopic dermatitis. © 2020 EAACI and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

BACKGROUND: High‑protein diets are widely used by athletes but may disturb the gut environment and increase production of odor‑related metabolites. Probiotic supplementation has been proposed as a strategy to support gastrointestinal function under such dietary stress. This study aimed to explore the effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on gastrointestinal symptoms, gut microbiota, and odor‑related metabolites in male athletes consuming a high‑protein diet. METHODS: In an exploratory, randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled trial, 60 healthy male athletes (mean age: 18.62 ± 0.75 years; mean BMI: 22.35 ± 1.80 kg/m2) consumed a whey protein supplement (70 g/day) together with either BB536 (46 billion CFU/day, as measured at the start of the intervention) or placebo for 4 weeks. Gastrointestinal symptoms, gut microbiota composition, skin‑emitted volatile compounds, and fecal metabolites were assessed. Subgroup analyses based on responder status and baseline enterotype were conducted post hoc to generate hypotheses regarding microbiota‑dependent responses. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, no significant between‑group differences were observed across gastrointestinal outcomes, gut microbiota indices, or metabolite profiles. Within the BB536 group, diarrhea‑related scores improved from baseline. Post hoc analyses suggested that increases in Faecalibacterium were evident among responders. Enterotype‑based patterns also emerged: individuals with Ruminococcus‑dominant microbiota showed higher skin‑emitted short‑chain fatty acids after BB536 intake, whereas those with Faecalibacterium‑dominant microbiota exhibited reductions in odor‑related metabolites, including methyl mercaptan and ammonia. Corresponding fecal metabolite shifts were modest. CONCLUSION: BB536 supplementation was associated with improvements in diarrhea‑related symptoms and odor‑related metabolites in specific microbiota‑defined subgroups. As these findings did not extend to the full cohort, they should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis‑generating. Baseline gut microbiota composition may influence probiotic responsiveness, warranting confirmatory trials with prespecified endpoints.

Background: Altered gut microbiota and gut-derived inflammation impair glucose regulation and promote metabolic endotoxemia, yet evidence on probiotic effects across combined glycaemic, inflammatory and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) outcomes remains limited. This study investigated the effects of a 12-week multi-species probiotic on glucose homeostasis, incretin hormones, inflammatory biomarkers and circulating SCFAs in adults with subthreshold depression. Methods: In a 12-week double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, 39 adults with subthreshold depression were allocated to either a probiotic supplement containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF16, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR06, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP01 and Bifidobacterium longum 04 (n = 19) or placebo (n = 20). Fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), soluble CD14 (sCD14) and SCFAs were evaluated at three time points: baseline, week 6 and week 12. Between-group and treatment × time effects were analysed using general linear models. Results: Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced fasting glucose at 12 weeks compared with placebo (-1.8 vs. 0.1 mmol/L; p = 0.036). In the probiotic group, greater reductions in GIP (p = 0.012; p = 0.037), LBP (p < 0.001), sCD14 (p = 0.002; p = 0.001) and hs-CRP (p = 0.047) were also observed compared with placebo. Plasma SCFA concentrations remained largely unchanged, with no significant treatment × time interactions, except for higher valerate levels at 12 weeks in the probiotic group (p = 0.019). Conclusions: Twelve weeks of multi-species probiotic supplementation improved fasting glucose, reduced incretin and inflammatory biomarkers and attenuated metabolic endotoxemia, without alterations in circulating SCFAs. These findings support beneficial modulation of metabolic-immune pathways and highlight the promising role of probiotics to enhance glucose regulation and systemic inflammatory tone in adults with subthreshold depression.

Respiratory and gastrointestinal infections are leading causes of morbidity in children. Increasing evidence highlights the gut-lung axis as a key regulatory interface influencing infection susceptibility. Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis B8762 (B8762) has shown clinical efficacy in reducing such infections, but its mechanistic basis remains unclear. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 115 infants (probiotic group: n = 57, placebo group: n = 58; aged 6-12 months), fecal metagenomic sequencing was performed to assess microbial and functional changes after four weeks of B8762 supplementation (0.5 × 1010 CFU/day). B8762 significantly altered the gut microbial structure (β-diversity, P < 0.05) without affecting α-diversity. The intervention enriched beneficial taxa including Bifidobacterium longum, Eubacterium limosum, and Roseburia hominis, while reducing potential pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Candida parapsilosis (P < 0.05). Functionally, B8762 upregulated metabolic pathways involved in coenzyme A and L-tryptophan biosynthesis and enhanced predicted production of immunoregulatory metabolites including butyrate, inosine, and chenodeoxycholic acid. In summary, this study suggests that B8762 modulates the pediatric gut microbiota toward a composition and metabolic profile that supports mucosal barrier integrity and systemic immune regulation. These findings provide mechanistic insight into its protective role against respiratory and gastrointestinal infections in children, supporting its use as a targeted gut-lung axis probiotic intervention.

Stroke is the major leading cause of death globally, and has a high disability rate. Malnutrition, cognitive dysfunction, motor impairment, and gut dysbiosis are observed in stroke patients. Our study explored the effects of Bifidobacterium longum OLP-01, a probiotic from an Olympics gold medalist, on cognitive function and gut microbiota as the primary outcomes, and on nutritional status and physical performance as the secondary outcomes in post-stroke patients. The study was a single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. We recruited 22 post-stroke patients. Participants received either placebo (placebo group, n = 10) or 2 × 1010 colony-forming units (CFU) of Bifidobacterium longum OLP-01 powder (OLP-01 group, n = 12) daily for 12 weeks. Nutritional status was assessed using Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). Cognitive function was evaluated by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail-Making Tests, and Stroop Color Naming Test. Physical performance was measured using Timed Up and Go Test and 6-Minute Walk Test. Blood and stool samples were collected for biochemical and gut microbiota analyses. The OLP-01 group increased MoCA scores, decreased time to completion of Trail-Making Tests, and had greater accuracy on incongruent in Stroop Color Naming Test, but decreased MNA scores within the normal ranges. The cognitive-related gut microbiota strain showed differences between the two groups. Supplementation of Bifidobacterium longum OLP-01 at a dose of 2 × 1010 CFU daily for 12 weeks improved cognitive function and changes gut microbiota, but did not alter physical performance in post-stroke patients. © The author(s).

BACKGROUND: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition marked by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, which substantially impacts children's academic and social performance. The aim of this research was to examine the effect of probiotic supplementation on executive functioning in children with ADHD. METHODS: This triple-blind, randomized controlled trial included 84 children with ADHD who were randomly allocated to receive either a probiotic supplement including Lactobacillus Acidophilus, Bifidobacterium Lactis, and Bifidobacterium Longum or a placebo, administered once daily for 2 months. Executive function was assessed using the parent form of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire. The data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance after adjusting the confounding variables. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between executive function scores of the groups at baseline (191.45 ± 20.725 vs. 190.55 ± 23.520, p = 0.214). Probiotic treatment significantly improved the scores of the intervention group compared to the control group (151.50 ± 16.784 vs. 190.68 ± 23.479, F = 7.93, p < 0.001) after adjusting for the confounders including age, BMI, and IQ. CONCLUSION: Probiotics may be beneficial as non-pharmacological adjunctive therapy for enhancing executive function in children with ADHD. Further studies with extended follow-up durations and objective neuropsychological evaluations are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT: IRCT20210531051454N2. © 2025 The Author(s). Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Comment in mSphere. 2026 Feb 24;11(2):e0085125. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00851-25. A dysfunctional gut microbiome has become increasingly common in infants born in high-income countries as Bifidobacterium strains no longer dominate the gut microbiome. Probiotics containing Bifidobacterium infantis have been used in breastfed newborns to successfully restore the gut microbiome; however, no studies to date have demonstrated this effect in older breastfed infants whose gut microbiomes are transitioning toward stability and maturity. This is a 9-week randomized controlled trial wherein 2-4 months old exclusively breastfed infants (n = 40) received 0 CFU/day B. infantis EVC001 (placebo), 4.0 × 109 CFU/day B. infantis EVC001 (low), 8.0 × 109 CFU/day B. infantis EVC001 (medium), or 1.8 × 1010 CFU/day B. infantis EVC001 (high) in equal allocation for 28 consecutive days beginning on day 8. Stool samples were collected on study days 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 63. Fecal B. infantis levels were significantly higher in all supplement groups compared with placebo on day 28 and day 63. On day 28, fecal B. infantis levels were significantly higher in infants who received any (low, medium, and high) dose compared with baseline. The abundance of fecal Bifidobacteriaceae significantly increased nearly 2-fold in response to B. infantis EVC001 supplementation. No matter the dose, probiotic supplementation with B. infantis in 2- to 4-month-old exclusively breastfed infants resulted in colonization until at least 1 month post-supplementation. IMPORTANCE: This study found that supplementing exclusively breastfed infants with a probiotic, Bifidobacterium infantis EVC001, between 2 and 4 months of age can successfully restore beneficial bacteria in their gut, even after the newborn period. Although previous research showed this effect in newborns, this is the first study to demonstrate that older infants, whose gut microbiomes are typically more stable, can still benefit. The probiotic was effective at all tested doses, with higher levels of B. infantis and overall Bifidobacteriaceae in infants' stool during and even 1 month after supplementation. This study demonstrates that B. infant

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder affecting women. This study investigates the impact of 8-week supplementation with two probiotic strains, Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum, on hormonal status, oxidative stress, and clinical symptoms in women with PCOS. Conducted as a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, the research involved 90 women with PCOS from Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Serum markers were assessed before and after the intervention. After adjusting for baseline values and confounding variables, the 8-week supplementation with two probiotic strains resulted in a significant increase in sex hormone binding globulin (24.39; 95% CI (15.23,33.55) vs. -11.99; 95% CI (-20.12, -3.86) nmol/L, P < 0.001), total antioxidant capacity (125.53; 95% CI (53.78,197.28) vs. -42.90; 95% CI (-78.32, -7.48) nmol/mL, P = 0.002) and Superoxide dismutase activity (0.19; 95% CI (0.09,0.30) vs. -0.11; 95% CI (-0.18, -0.04) U/mL, P < 0.001), in the intervention group compared to the placebo. While free androgen index (-57.05; 95% CI (-80.33, -33.76) vs. 49.86; 95% CI (28.81,70.92), P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (-0.50; 95% CI (-0.95, -0.04) vs. 0.05; 95% CI (-0.39,0.50), P = 0.046), and malondialdehyde levels (- 23.69; 95% CI (-30.02, -17.35) vs. -2.70; 95% CI (-9.19,3.77), P < 0.001), significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the placebo. Furthermore, testosterone total levels showed a decreasing trend in the intervention group, although the between-group changes were not statistically significant after baseline value and other confounders adjustment (-3.37; 95% CI (-11.85, 5.11) vs. 6.48; 95% CI (3.43, 9.53) ng/dL, P = 0.08). Regarding clinical symptoms, including acne, alopecia, and hirsutism, the between-group changes were insignificant (P > 0.05). In conclusion, these findings suggest that 8 weeks of probiotic supplementation may alleviate oxidative stress, modulate certain hormonal factors, and reduce inflammation in women with PCOS. Trial registration, the current study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials on 30 March 2024 (ID: IRCT20121216011763N62)

BACKGROUND: Maternal microbiota during pregnancy plays a crucial role in establishing the neonatal gut microbiota, which is essential for infant health. This study aimed to trace maternal microbial sources contributing to early neonatal gut colonization and assess the effect of prenatal probiotic supplementation on maternal-to-neonatal microbial transmission. METHODS: A total of 26 mother-neonate pairs undergoing full-term vaginal delivery were enrolled. From gestational week 32 until delivery, the intervention group received a probiotic supplement containing Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus delbrueckii bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus twice daily, while the control group received no supplementation. Maternal fecal, vaginal, and placental samples were collected at full term, and neonatal fecal samples were collected longitudinally at Days 1, 3, 14, and 6 months postpartum. Microbial community profiling was performed using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Microbial source attribution was conducted using the FEAST algorithm. RESULTS: Alpha and beta diversity analyses showed that prenatal probiotics transiently altered the composition of neonatal meconium microbiota, with no significant differences observed at later time points. Volatility analysis revealed enhanced microbial stability in the probiotic group during Days 1 to 3 (P < 0.001). FEAST source-tracking indicated that maternal gut and placenta were the major contributors to neonatal meconium colonization, with gut-derived input increasing over time and vaginal contributions remaining minimal throughout. Probiotic supplementation significantly increased the placental contribution to meconium microbiota (P = 0.02), with a sustained but non-significant elevation observed through later stages. Meanwhile, gut-derived and vaginal-derived inputs were consistently reduced in the probiotic group, though these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the dynamic nature of maternal-to-neonatal microbial transmission and demonstrates that prenatal probiotic supplementation can transiently reshape early colonization patterns by modulating source contributions. TRIAL

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by cognitive decline and associated metabolic disturbances, including altered amino acid profiles. This study investigated the effects of probiotic supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus HA-114 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 on serum amino acid levels in adults with mild to moderate AD. In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 60 participants (aged 50-90 years) were assigned to three groups: L. rhamnosus (n = 20), B. longum (n = 20), or placebo (n = 20). Serum amino acids were analyzed using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (LC). Changes in total amino acids, Branched Chain Amino Acids (BCAAs), and aromatic amino acids (AAAs) were assessed as the primary outcomes. A significant interaction effect was found between time and group for serum amino acids. Compared to placebo, the B. longum group showed a significant increase in total amino acids (difference: 2132.67 µmol/L, 95% CI: 464.06-3801.28; p = 0.01), BCAAs (difference: 255.15 µmol/L, 95% CI: 53.01-457.30; p = 0.01), and AAAs (difference: 374.34 ng/ml, 95% CI: 57.45-691.23; p = 0.02). The L. rhamnosus group also showed a significant increase in BCAAs compared to placebo (difference: 206.08 µmol/L, 95% CI: 3.94-408.23; p = 0.04). The greatest improvements were consistently observed in the B. longum group across all primary outcome measures. Probiotic supplementation, particularly with B. longum, significantly improved serum amino acid profiles in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. These findings support the potential of specific probiotic strains to address metabolic imbalances in AD through gut-brain axis modulation. Trial Registration: IRCT number: 20210513051277N1 (2021-05-27). © 2025. The Author(s).

Chronic constipation represents a burden in the modern world and is most prevalent in the elderly. Constipation has been linked to alterations in the gut microbiota, especially to an increase in methanogenic microorganisms. Prebiotics and some probiotics have already shown beneficial effects in constipation through improving stool consistency and modulating the gut microbiota. In the current double-blind, randomized and parallel-arm clinical study, 24 subjects with constipation were supplemented with NextDext™, a dextran prebiotic, or ABB C24, a prebiotic-postbiotic combination of NextDext™ and ABB C22®, for two weeks to evaluate their effects on stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale) and gut microbiome. The results showed a significant improvement in stool consistency after taking NextDext™ from constipated to normal (Bristol Scale) and a trend to improvement after ABB C24 supplementation. Consumption of NextDext™ increased the presence of some beneficial bacterial groups, such as Bifidobacterium longum and Roseburia hominis, and reduced the presence of microorganisms associated with constipation, such as Blautia obeum, Escherichia coli and Collinsella aerofaciens. Consumption of ABB C24 reduced the presence of Blautia obeum and the methanogenic bacteria Methanobrevibacter smithii, while increased beneficial Clostridium leptum and Coprococcus spp. There were no significant alterations in gut diversity indexes of richness and evenness, even if ABB C24 seemed to increase diversity in a greater number of volunteers. Although NextDext™ influenced more microbial groups and restored microbial groups associated with opioid use, the species modulated by ABB C24 reverted microbial alterations consistently reported in constipation, suggesting an added value of the postbiotic ABB C22®. Both could benefit different profiles of constipation sufferers. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06738433.

Disturbances in the gut microbiota composition are associated with chronic inflammatory diseases of the intestine and the liver. In a preliminary study, Lactobacillus plantarum LC27 and Bifidobacterium longum LC67 could inhibit Escherichia coli growth and lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-κB activation linked to gut inflammation. Here, we investigated their effects on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis and liver damage in mice. First, oral administration of LC27 or LC67 (1 × 109 CFU/mouse) inhibited TNBS-induced colon shortening [F(5,30) = 100.66, P < 0.05] and myeloperoxidase activity [F(5,30) = 56.48, P < 0.05]. These probiotics restored TNBS-induced disturbance of gut microbiota, leading to the suppression of Proteobacteria to Bacteroidetes ratio and fecal and blood lipopolysaccharide levels. Second, LC27 and LC67 inhibited TNBS-induced NF-κB activation, reversed TNBS-suppressed tight junction protein expression, and restored Th17/Treg balance. Also, treatment with LC27 or LC67 significantly decreased TNBS-induced alanine transaminase [ALT, F(5,30) = 3.50, P < 0.05] and aspartate transaminase [AST, F(5,30) = 12.81, P < 0.05] levels in the blood, as well as t-butylhydroperoxide-induced ALT and AST levels. Finally, the mixture of LC27 and LC67 (0.5 × 109 CFU/mouse, respectively) synergistically attenuated TNBS- or t-butylhydroperoxide-induced colitis and liver damage. The capability of LC27 and LC67 to reverse TNBS-mediated microbiota shift and damage signals suggests that these probiotics may synergistically attenuate colitis and liver injury by alleviating gut microbiota imbalance.

PURPOSE: Active hexose-correlated compound (AHCC) is a commercial extract obtained from Basidiomycetes under controlled conditions, yielding a 74 % content in oligosaccharides, especially α-glucans. AHCC has a number of therapeutic effects, including intestinal anti-inflammatory activity. Bifidobacterium longum BB536 is a probiotic with potential health-promoting effect at the gut level. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the possibility of synergism between AHCC, which is believed to act as a prebiotic, and B. longum BB536. METHODS: We used the trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid model (TNBS) of colitis in rats. AHCC (100 or 500 mg kg(-1)) and B. longum BB536 (5 × 10(6) CFU rat(-1) day(-1)) were administered together or separately for 7 days prior to colitis induction and then for another 7 days and compared with control (noncolitic) and TNBS rats. RESULTS: The results show that both treatments had intestinal anti-inflammatory activity separately, which was enhanced when used in combination, as shown by changes in body weight gain, colonic weight to length ratio, myeloperoxydase activity and iNOS expression. Interestingly, the association of AHCC 100 mg kg(-1) + B. longum BB536 showed the highest anti-inflammatory activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide a preclinical experimental basis for the synergistic effect of AHCC and B. longum BB536 on inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: Studies suggest that synbiotic therapy could prove more effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) than therapies limited to probiotics or prebiotics. This study compared the effect of each of these therapies in the treatment of UC. METHODS: One hundred twenty outpatients with UC were randomly sorted into three groups of 40 patients each for probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic therapy. The probiotic group ingested one daily capsule consisting of Bifidobacterium longum 2 x 10(9) colony-forming units and the prebiotic group ingested daily 8.0-g doses of psyllium. The synbiotic group underwent both treatments. All patients completed Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaires (IBDQs) at the onset of the trial, at the 2-wk midpoint, and at the 4-wk end of the trial. Blood variables were also evaluated in a subset of 32 patients randomly selected from all groups and values were compared with IBDQ scores. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients in the probiotic group, 31 in the prebiotic group, and 32 in the synbiotic group qualified for analyses. The remaining 26 patients had incomplete questionnaires. Total IBDQ scores improved within groups by the end of the trial (probiotics 162 to 169, NS; prebiotics 174 to 182, NS; synbiotics 168 to 176, P = 0.03). Individual scores improved as follows: probiotics, emotional function (P = 0.03); prebiotics, bowel function (P = 0.04); and synbiotics, systemic and social functions (P = 0.008 and P = 0.02). C-reactive protein decreased significantly only with synbiotic therapy (from 0.59 to 0.14 mg/dL, P = 0.04). There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Patients with UC on synbiotic therapy experienced greater quality-of-life changes than patients on probiotic or prebiotic treatment. These data suggest that synbiotic therapy may have a synergistic effect in the treatment of UC.

The intestinal bacteria, Eubacterium sp. and Bifidobacterium sp., participate in the metabolism of active kampo-ingredients, glycyrrhizin (GL), sennoside (SEN) and baicalin (BL). Since antibiotics and bacterial preparations, Bifidobacterium longum (LAC-B), Clostridium butyricum (MIYA-BM), and Streptococcus faecalis (BIOFERMIN), affect the bacterial population in intestinal bacterial flora, metabolism of the active kampo-ingredients in the bacterial flora may be altered by their combined administration. We investigated 1199 prescriptions including kampo-medicines for 308 patients. Combination use of kampo-medicines with antibiotics and bacterial preparations occurred with 7% and 10% of the kampo-prescription, respectively. Most antibiotics have activity against intestinal bacteria, except that cephems and macrolides are not active against to E. coli. This means that antibiotics may lower the metabolism of GL, SEN and BL when administered in combination. On the other hand, it is also highly possible that bacterial preparations increase the number of Eubacterium sp. and Bifidobacterium sp., resulting in enhanced metabolism of GL and SEN when they are used concomitantly with kampo-medicines. The present results suggested that the drug interactions of kampo-medicines with antibiotics and bacterial preparations should be confirmed in clinical studies.

Cow milk contains essential nutrients, with β-casein existing in A1 and A2 forms. Studies suggest that A2 milk (containing only A2 β-casein) may offer gastrointestinal (GI) benefits compared to A1/A2 milk (containing both forms). This study investigated the effects of A2 milk consumption on the gut microbiota of South Korean cohort experiencing GI discomfort after consuming A1/A2 milk. Thirty-five participants with GI discomfort after milk consumption were included. Stool DNA was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing before and after consuming either A1/A2 or A2 milk. Beta diversity analysis using the generalized UniFrac distance method revealed a significant shift in gut microbiota composition after A2 milk consumption (p = 0.04), but no significant change after consuming A1/A2 milk. Significant differences in gut microbiota composition were found between A1/A2 and A2 milk drinkers after milk consumption (p = 0.031). Alpha diversity indices remained unchanged. Notable increases in beneficial microbes, including Bifidobacterium and Blautia, were observed after A2 milk intake. Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis identified significant enrichment of Actinobacteria, particularly Bifidobacterium longum and Blautia wexlerae, in the A2 group. Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) analysis highlighted enriched transport systems related to energy, peptides, sugars, and raffinose family oligosaccharides in the A2 group. Spearman correlation showed significant associations between Bifidobacterium, Blautia, and enhanced transport systems exclusively in the A2 group. Two weeks of A2 milk consumption led to significant alterations in gut microbiota, promoting beneficial microbes and related functions. A2 milk could be a suitable alternative for subjects who experience milk-intake-related GI discomfort. Copyright: © 2025 Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that probiotics are effective in treating allergic rhinitis (AR), while some controversies remain. This study was performed to evaluate the therapeutic effect and safety of a mixture of Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus plantarum (NVP-1703) in children with AR. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, children aged 6 to 19 years with perennial AR were treated with NVP-1703 at a dose of 1 × 1010 CFU/day or placebo once a day for 4 weeks. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS), nasal symptom duration score (NSDS), quality of life (QoL), allergic inflammatory markers, and safety parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, the TNSS in the NVP-1703 group significantly decreased compared to that in the placebo group (P = 0.011), both in the morning and the evening (P = 0.031 and P = 0.004, respectively). The NSDS also significantly decreased in the NVP-1703 group compared to that in the placebo group (P = 0.018). QoL scores, particularly those related to mouth breathing and itchy nose, showed a significant improvement in the NVP-1703 group compared to the placebo group. The ratios of interleukin (IL)-4/IL-22 and IL-5/IL-22 were significantly reduced in the NVP-1703 group after the treatment compared to the baseline values. No notable adverse events were reported in the NVP-1703 group. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of a mixture of B. longum and L. plantarum (NVP-1703) improved both AR symptoms and QoL in children with perennial AR, accompanied by decreases in the ratios of T helper 2 cytokines to IL-22. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0002661. © 2024 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Cinnamon is a spice obtained from the bark of Cinnamomum and contains anti-inflammatory ingredients such as coumarin, cinnamaldehyde, and cinnamic acid. This study evaluated the effect of cinnamon water extract (CWE) on the symptoms of subjects with diarrhea in an 8-week randomized controlled trial. Seventy subjects with diarrhea symptoms were randomized and received three capsules of 400 mg CWE or placebo twice daily for 8 weeks. CWE intake significantly increased colonic transit time (p = 0.019) and fecal isobutyric acid (p = 0.008) and spermidine (p = 0.009) contents compared to placebo intake. In contrast, CWE decreased fecal indole (p = 0.032) and agmatine (p = 0.018) contents. Gut microbiota analysis showed increased alpha diversity and significant changes in strains such as Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 55813 (LDA = 1.38) in the CWE group compared with the placebo group. Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 55813 showed a positive correlation with colon transit time and stool phenol and spermidine contents. CWE improved diarrhea symptoms and changed the composition of stools and the gut microbiota. These results indicate that cinnamon intake relieves diarrhea symptoms through metabolic changes due to changes in intestinal microbial groups.

Erratum in J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Jan 30;29(1):125. doi: 10.5056/jnm21202E. BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aim to evaluate the differences in the microbiome of responders and non-responders, as well as predict the response to probiotic therapy, based on fecal microbiome data in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). METHODS: A multi-strain probiotics that contains Lactobacillus acidophilus (KCTC 11906BP), Lactobacillus plantarum (KCTC11867BP), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (KCTC 11868BP), Bifidobacterium breve (KCTC 11858BP), Bifidobacterium lactis (KCTC 11903BP), Bifidobacterium longum (KCTC 11860BP), and Streptococcus thermophilus (KCTC 11870BP) were used. Patients were categorized into probiotic and placebo groups, and fecal samples were collected from all patients before and at the end of 8 weeks of treatment. The probiotic group was further divided into responders and non-responders. Responders were defined as patients who experienced adequate relief of overall irritable bowel syndrome symptoms after probiotic therapy. Fecal microbiota were investigated using Illumina MiSeq and analyzed using the EzBioCloud 16S database and microbiome pipeline (https://www.EZbiocloud.net). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the alpha and beta diversity between the responder and non-responder groups. The abundances of the phylum Proteobacteria and genus Bacteroides significantly decreased after probiotic treatment. Bifidobacterium bifidum, Pediococcus acidilactici, and Enterococcus faecium showed a significantly higher abundance in the probiotic group after treatment compared to the placebo group. Enterococcus faecalis and Lactococcus lactis were identified as biomarkers of non-response to probiotics. The abundance of Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans significantly increased in the responders after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic treatment changes some composition of fecal bacteria in patients with IBS-D. E. faecalis and L. lactis may be prediction biomarkers for non-response to probiotics. Increased abundance of F. sccharivorans is correlated to symptom improvement by probiotics in patients with IBS-D.

Generalized healthy eating patterns may not benefit everyone due to different genetics and enterotypes. We aimed to compare the effects of a low-glycemic diet representing the Korean traditional balanced diet (Low-GID) and westernized diet as a control diet (CD) on anthropometry, serum metabolites, and fecal bacteria in a randomized clinical trial according to enterotypes. We recruited 52 obese women aged 30-50 years, and they consumed Low-GID and CD meals for 1 month, with a 1-month washout period, in a crossover randomized clinical trial. The Low-GID was mainly composed of whole grains with fish, vegetables, seaweeds, and perilla oil, whereas CD contained refined rice, bread, noodles, meats, and processed foods. Serum lipid profiles, metabolomics, serum short-chain fatty acids, and fecal bacteria were analyzed. The important variables influenced by Low-GID and CD were determined by SHAP value in the XGBoost algorithm according to Bacteroides (ET-B) and Prevotella (ET-P). Low-GID and CD interventions did not change the enterotypes, but they modified serum metabolites and some fecal bacterial species differently according to enterotypes. The 10-fold cross-validation of the XGBoost classifier in the ET-P and ET-B clusters was 0.91 ± 0.04 and 0.8 ± 0.07, respectively. In the ET-P cluster, serum L-homocysteine, glutamate, leucine concentrations, and muscle mass were higher in the CD group than in the Low-GID group, whereas serum 3-hydroxybutyric acid concentration was significantly higher in the Low-GID group than in the CD group (p < 0.05). In fecal bacteria, Gemmiger formicilis, Collinsella aerofaciens, and Escherichia coli were higher in the CD group than in the Low-GID group. In the ET-B cohort, serum tryptophan and total cholesterol concentrations were higher in the CD group than in the Low-GID group, whereas serum glutathione and 3-hydroxybutyric acid concentrations were significantly higher in the Low-GID group than in the CD group (p < 0.05). However, Bifidobacterium longum was higher in CD than Low-GID in the ET-B cluster, but serum butyric acid levels were higher in the Low-GID than in the CD group. In conclusion, Low-GID can be recommended in obese women

The biological succession that occurs during the first year of life in the gut of infants in Western countries is broadly predictable in terms of the increasing complexity of the composition of microbiotas. Less information is available about microbiotas in Asian countries, where environmental, nutritional, and cultural influences may differentially affect the composition and development of the microbial community. We compared the fecal microbiotas of Indonesian (n = 204) and New Zealand (NZ) (n = 74) infants 6 to 7 months and 12 months of age. Comparisons were made by analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences and derivation of community diversity metrics, relative abundances of bacterial families, enterotypes, and cooccurrence correlation networks. Abundances of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis and B. longum subsp. longum were determined by quantitative PCR. All observations supported the view that the Indonesian and NZ infant microbiotas developed in complexity over time, but the changes were much greater for NZ infants. B. longum subsp. infantis dominated the microbiotas of Indonesian children, whereas B. longum subsp. longum was dominant in NZ children. Network analysis showed that the niche model (in which trophic adaptation results in preferential colonization) of the assemblage of microbiotas was supported in Indonesian infants, whereas the neutral (stochastic) model was supported by the development of the microbiotas of NZ infants. The results of the study show that the development of the fecal microbiota is not the same for infants in all countries, and they point to the necessity of obtaining a better understanding of the factors that control the colonization of the gut in early life.IMPORTANCE This study addresses the microbiology of a natural ecosystem (the infant bowel) for children in a rural setting in Indonesia and in an urban environment in New Zealand. Analysis of DNA sequences generated from the microbial community (microbiota) in the feces of the infants during the first year of life showed marked differences in the composition and complexity of the bacterial collections. The differences were most likely due to differences in the prevalence a