NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

DHA (Pregnancy)

WOMEN HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

DHA (Pregnancy) is an evidence-graded women health monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 79,336 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 4 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 79,336
Reported Trial Dosages 1 g · 200µg/day · 100µg/day
Trial Duration Range 37 weeks · 34 weeks · 16 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1 g · 200µg/day · 100µg/day) over a structured 37 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
liver (PubMed clinical endpoint)
depression (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is DHA (Pregnancy) & Why Does Form Matter?

DHA (Pregnancy) is classified under WOMEN HEALTH and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1 g, 200µg/day, 100µg/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for DHA (Pregnancy) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (4 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, DHA (Pregnancy) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns DHA (Pregnancy) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 79,336 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39067112 (2024) — "Docosahexaenoic Acid and Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association with Improved Maternal and Fetal Health." (Given this is a common problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality, further research is required.) • PMID:35772387 (2022) — "Interventions for the Prevention of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (Author information: (1)Department of Maternal and F) • PMID:35348829 (2023) — "Impact of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake in pregnancy on maternal health and birth outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trails." (38 comparisons (16,505 infants) had a significant increase in birth weight (MD = 49.19, 95% CI 28.47-69.91, p < 0.00001; I2 = 100%).)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 390671122.46 (1.28–4.73)PMID 357723872.46 (1.28–4.73)PMID 353488290.84 (0.74–0.96)PMID 329429380.92 (0.85–1.01)PMID 320398060.82 (0.7–0.97)PMID 304807730.58 (0.44–0.77)PMID 384087250.130.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1 g · 200µg/day · 100µg/day · 2 g/day over 37 weeks · 34 weeks · 16 weeks · 15 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for DHA (Pregnancy), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1 g · 200µg/day · 100µg/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 37 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 23 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) (2024) PMID: 39067112 ↗
Docosahexaenoic Acid and Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association with Improved Maternal and Fetal Health.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) involving n = 5,710 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (RR 2.46). Key conclusion: Given this is a common problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality, further research is required.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPRoM) is a significant cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this project was to identify interventions that reduce the prevalence of PPRoM. METHODS: Search strategy included a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The selection criteria included randomized control studies that compared a therapy to standard care (no therapy or placebo) in pregnancy and included PPRoM as an outcome. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies examining 10 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Therapies included docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), aspirin, rofecoxib, vitamin C alone and with vitamin E, folic acid (alone, with iron, with iron and zinc, within a multiple micronutrient supplement), zinc, calcium, copper, and treatment of bacterial vaginosis. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of PPRoM in the treatment groups compared to placebo, except for rofecoxib which showed an increased risk of PPRoM (RR 2.46, 95% CI 1.28-4.73; p = 0.007, 1 trial, 98 women; very low quality of evidence) and a multiple micronutrient supplement which showed a reduction in PPRoM (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84; p = 0.01, 1 trial, 1,671 women; very low quality of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: No interventions have been convincingly shown to reduce the prevalence of PPRoM. Given this is a common problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality, further research is required. © 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.

02
META-ANALYSIS Fetal diagnosis and therapy (2022) PMID: 35772387 ↗
Interventions for the Prevention of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Fetal diagnosis and therapy involving n = 98 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.007 (RR 2.46). Key conclusion: Author information: (1)Department of Maternal and F
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

2. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2022;49(5-6):273-278. doi: 10.1159/000525655. Epub 2022 Jun 30. Interventions for the Prevention of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. El-Achi V(1), Aggarwal S(2), Hyett J(3)(4). Author information: (1)Department of Maternal and F

03
META-ANALYSIS Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2023) PMID: 35348829 ↗
Impact of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake in pregnancy on maternal health and birth outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trails.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics involving n = 21,919 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.008 (RR 0.84). Key conclusion: 38 comparisons (16,505 infants) had a significant increase in birth weight (MD = 49.19, 95% CI 28.47-69.91, p < 0.00001; I2 = 100%).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Maternal omega-3 consumption during pregnancy has been positively linked with a positive impact on maternal health and fetal growth. However, the results of individual studies are inconsistent and conflicting. OBJECTIVE: Examine the effect of supplementation with DHA, and/or EPA, and/or ALA throughout pregnancy on offspring's growth and pregnancy outcomes. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. POPULATION: Pregnant women. METHODS: According to (PRISMA) statement and the Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Human trials (RCT or quasi-RCT) which involved oral omega-3 supplementation at least twice a week during pregnancy were included and comparing it with control groups with no supplementation or placebo administration. Data were extracted and directed using RevMan software. Fifty-nine randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Performed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library comparing omega 3 with control groups, from 1990 to 2020. THE MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational duration, preterm birth, early preterm birth, birth weight, low birth weight, neonatal length, and head circumference. The secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit, infant death, prenatal death, and cesarean section. RESULTS: In 24 comparisons (21,919 women) n-3 fatty acids played a protective role against the risk of preeclampsia (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96 p = 0.008; I2 = 24%). In 46 comparisons (16,254 women) n-3 fatty acids were associated with a significantly greater duration of pregnancy (MD = 1.35, 95% CI 0.65-2.05, p = 0.0002; I2 = 59%). 27 comparisons (15,510 women) was accompanied by a significant decrease in pre-term birth less than 37 weeks (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.95, p = 0.005; I2 = 0%). 12 comparisons (11,774 women) was accompanied by a significant decrease in early pre-term birth less than 34 weeks (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95, p = 0.01; I2 = 40%). 38 comparisons (16,505 infants) had a significant increase in birth weight (MD = 49.19, 95% CI 28.47-69.91, p < 0.00001; I2 = 100%). Finally, 14 comparisons (8,449 i

04
META-ANALYSIS Nordic journal of psychiatry (2021) PMID: 33190574 ↗
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) supplementation for prevention and treatment of perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nordic journal of psychiatry involving n = 3,181 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Although n-3 PUFA supplementation may improve maternal and infant outcomes, our meta-analysis found insufficient evidence to determine its benefit for perinatal depression.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Available interventions for preventing and treating perinatal depression remain unsatisfactory. AIMS: We examined the prophylactic and therapeutic effects, as well as adverse effects, of n-3 PUFA supplementation in reducing depressive symptoms during perinatal periods. METHODS: We included randomized, placebo-controlled trials that reported the changes of depression severity after the perinatal participants received n-3 PUFA supplementation. After the comprehensive searches in October 2019, we selected the trials, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of included trials. We compared the standardized mean differences (SMD) of depression score changes between groups using a random-effect model. RESULTS: We included 11 trials in the meta-analysis and one more trial for qualitative analysis (N = 3,181). The pooled standardized mean of decreased depression scores revealed no statistically significant difference between the n-3 PUFA and the placebo groups (N = 920, SMDs = -0.05, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.10, I2 = 21%). The pooled SMDs showed no statistically significant efficacy of n-3 PUFA supplementation for prevention (N = 779, SMDs = -0.03, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.13, I2 = 24%) and treatment (N = 141, SMDs = -0.14, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.27, I2 = 31%) of perinatal depression. The efficacy of n-3 PUFA supplementation was not associated with the daily doses of DHA, EPA, or DHA plus EPA. No trial reported any serious adverse effect of n-3 PUFA supplements. CONCLUSIONS: Although n-3 PUFA supplementation may improve maternal and infant outcomes, our meta-analysis found insufficient evidence to determine its benefit for perinatal depression.

05
META-ANALYSIS The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine (2022) PMID: 32942938 ↗
Association between omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and lower risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine involving n = 20,124 participants (RR 0.92). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation was not associated with reduced risk of preterm delivery compared with placebo or no treatment during pregnancy.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether omega-3 fatty acid supplementation is associated with lower risk of preterm delivery. METHODS: Searching the RCTs which were compared preterm birth between women with omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and without before December 2019 on Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane's Library, then performing a meta-analysis. RESULTS: 26 trials were identified, included 20124 women. There was almost no association between omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and lower risk of preterm delivery (risk ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.01, I2 = 9%), gestational duration (0.30, -0.05 to 0.64, I2 = 48%). In subgroup analyses, preterm delivery lower rate occurred in groups with mixed DHA and EPA supplementation not only DHA supplementation groups (P for interaction = 0.02); The dose of equivalent greater than 1 g made a higher reduction in preterm birth significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation was not associated with reduced risk of preterm delivery compared with placebo or no treatment during pregnancy. Relationship between Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and other pregnant outcomes need more evidence and clinical studies.

06
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition reviews (2021) PMID: 32918470 ↗
Impact of omega-3 fatty acid DHA and EPA supplementation in pregnant or breast-feeding women on cognitive performance of children: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition reviews. Key conclusion: No significant association was found between DHA/EPA supplementation and any of the assessed cognitive parameters or birth weight.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: The omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) are important for brain development and cognitive performance. Because they are semi-essential fatty acids, they must be obtained from food. However, the dietary reference intakes of DHA and EPA have not yet been established. In women, a low DHA and/or EPA serum level during pregnancy or breastfeeding might negatively affect their children. For this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials on the association between the consumption of fish oil supplements in pregnant and/or breastfeeding women and the cognitive performance of their children. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Central literature databases were systematically searched. We included and extracted relevant studies in duplicate and assessed study quality. Cognitive outcomes were grouped according to published criteria and according to time elapsed after the intervention. We performed fixed-effects meta-analyses for each cognitive outcome and for birth weight. We assessed potential confounding with meta-regressions and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials were included. No significant association was found between DHA/EPA supplementation and any of the assessed cognitive parameters or birth weight. DISCUSSION: Our results confirm previous reviews on the studied topic. Reasons for inconclusive results may be small sample sizes for each assessed category, questionable quality of included studies, and the difficulty of reliably measuring cognitive performance in small children. Blood levels of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids were mostly not comparable. Furthermore, the influence of genetic and environmental factors could not be assessed. Studies in this field should address such shortcomings. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

07
META-ANALYSIS Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology (2020) PMID: 32039806 ↗
Efficacy of n-3 fatty acids supplementation on the prevention of pregnancy induced-hypertension or preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.024 (RR 0.82). Key conclusion: The analysis of the 10 comparisons revealed that n-3 fatty acid supplements for pregnant women did not mitigate the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.07; p = 0.652; I2 = 0%).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The efficacy of n-3 fatty acids supplementation on the prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia remains unclear. The aim of study was to examine the effect of supplementation with EPA, and/or DHA, and/or ALA during pregnancy on the pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia. A systematic search was performed on Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), Cochrane Library, and Google scholar, which covered the period between 1991 and 2018. The clinical trials with any control groups (i.e. placebo or other supplementation) were selected. The whole process of meta-analysis and data analysis was done using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2.0, Biostat). The searched keywords were: "Fatty Acids, Omega-3", "n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid" "Eicosapentaenoic Acid", "Docosahexaenoic Acids", "n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid", "n-3 PUFAs", "alpha-Linolenic Acid", "fish oil", "Nuts", "nutrient", or their synonyms "pregnancy induced hypertension" and preeclampsia. In addition, some key journals, according to Scopus report and the references of the original and review articles, were manually searched for possible related studies. The meta-analysis of the 14 comparisons demonstrated that n-3 fatty acids supplementation played a protective role against the risk of preeclampsia (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97; p = 0.024; I2 = 19.0%). The analysis of the 10 comparisons revealed that n-3 fatty acid supplements for pregnant women did not mitigate the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.07; p = 0.652; I2 = 0%). The n-3 fatty acid supplements are an effective strategy to prevent the incidence of preeclampsia in women with low-risk pregnancies.

08
META-ANALYSIS Reproductive biomedicine online (2019) PMID: 31160241 ↗
Influence of oral vitamin and mineral supplementation on male infertility: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Reproductive biomedicine online (SMD 0.57). Key conclusion: The meta-analysis showed significant improvement in semen parameters for selenium (200µg/day and 100µg/day) (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.64 for oligozoospermia, 1.39 for asthenozoospermia), L-carnitine (2 g/day) and acetyl-L-carnitine (LAC; 1 g/day) combined (SMD 0.57 for as
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This meta-analysis and systematic review investigated evidence of the effect of oral micronutrient supplementation on male fertility. Following searches of PubMed, Ovid/Ovid Medline(r) and Embase, 18 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis (seven studies) and/or the systematic review (12 studies). The meta-analysis showed significant improvement in semen parameters for selenium (200µg/day and 100µg/day) (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.64 for oligozoospermia, 1.39 for asthenozoospermia), L-carnitine (2 g/day) and acetyl-L-carnitine (LAC; 1 g/day) combined (SMD 0.57 for asthenozoospermia), and co-enzyme Q10 (200 and 300 mg/day) (SMD 0.95 for oligozoospermia, 1.48 for asthenozoospermia, 0.63 for teratozoospermia). The systematic review identified promising data for supplementation with 66 mg/day zinc combined with folic acid (5 mg/day), and the polyunsaturated fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 1.12 g/day) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 0.72 g/day). Pregnancy rate was evaluated in a limited number of trials (four in the meta-analysis, three in the systematic review). This analysis suggests supplementation with selenium (alone or combined with N-acetylcysteine), co-enzyme Q10 and the combinations L-carnitine + acetyl-L-carnitine, folic acid + zinc and EPA + DHA is beneficial in the treatment of male infertility. Because of the small number of available studies and low number of participants, further well-designed clinical studies are needed to obtain a better overview of efficient methods of treating male infertility.

09
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2018) PMID: 30480773 ↗
Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 19,927 participants (RR 0.58). Key conclusion: Most trials were conducted in upper-middle or high-income countries; and nearly half the trials included women at increased/high risk for factors which might increase the risk of adverse maternal and birth outcomes.Preterm birth < 37 weeks (13.4% versus 11.9%; risk ratio (RR) 0.8
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Higher intakes of foods containing omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA), such as fish, during pregnancy have been associated with longer gestations and improved perinatal outcomes. This is an update of a review that was first published in 2006. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of omega-3 LCPUFA, as supplements or as dietary additions, during pregnancy on maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes and longer-term outcomes for mother and child. SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (16 August 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing omega-3 fatty acids (as supplements or as foods, stand-alone interventions, or with a co-intervention) during pregnancy with placebo or no omega-3, and studies or study arms directly comparing omega-3 LCPUFA doses or types. Trials published in abstract form were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias in trials and assessed quality of evidence for prespecified birth/infant, maternal, child/adult and health service outcomes using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: In this update, we included 70 RCTs (involving 19,927 women at low, mixed or high risk of poor pregnancy outcomes) which compared omega-3 LCPUFA interventions (supplements and food) compared with placebo or no omega-3. Overall study-level risk of bias was mixed, with selection and performance bias mostly at low risk, but there was high risk of attrition bias in some trials. Most trials were conducted in upper-middle or high-income countries; and nearly half the trials included women at increased/high risk for factors which might increase the risk of adverse maternal and birth outcomes.Preterm birth < 37 weeks (13.4% versus 11.9%; risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 0.97; 26 RCTs, 10,304 participants; high-quality evidence) and early preterm birth < 34 weeks (4.6% versus 2.7%; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44 to

10
META-ANALYSIS European journal of nutrition (2019) PMID: 30251019 ↗
The effectiveness of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid interventions during pregnancy on obesity measures in the offspring: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of nutrition involving n = 3,644 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: These results indicate that maternal supplementation with ω-3 LCPUFA during pregnancy does not have a beneficial effect on obesity risk.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The potential role of ω-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LCPUFA) supplementation during pregnancy on subsequent risk of obesity outcomes in the offspring is not clear and there is a need to synthesise this evidence. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including the most recent studies, was conducted to assess the effectiveness of ω-3 LCPUFA interventions during pregnancy on obesity measures, e.g. BMI, body weight, fat mass in offspring. METHODS: Included RCTs had a minimum of 1-month follow-up post-partum. The search included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, WHO's International Clinical Trials Reg., E-theses and Web of Science databases. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs, from ten unique trials, (3644 children) examined the effectiveness of ω-3 LCPUFA maternal supplementation during pregnancy on the development of obesity outcomes in offspring. There were heterogeneities between the trials in terms of their sample, type and duration of intervention and follow-up. Pooled estimates did not show an association between prenatal intake of fatty acids and obesity measures in offspring. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that maternal supplementation with ω-3 LCPUFA during pregnancy does not have a beneficial effect on obesity risk. Due to the high heterogeneity between studies along with small sample sizes and high rates of attrition, the effects of ω-3 LCPUFA supplementation during pregnancy for prevention of childhood obesity in the long-term remains unclear. Large high-quality RCTs are needed that are designed specifically to examine the effect of prenatal intake of fatty acids for prevention of childhood obesity. There is also a need to determine specific sub-groups in the population that might get a greater benefit and whether different ω-3 LCPUFA, i.e. eicosapentaenoic (EPA) vs. docosahexanoic (DHA) acids might potentially have different effects.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category