NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

FOS (Fructooligosaccharides)

PROBIOTICS · Evidence Monograph

FOS (Fructooligosaccharides) is an evidence-graded probiotics monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (1 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 732 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 1 Meta · 7 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 732
Reported Trial Dosages 5 g · 7.5 g/day · 4.9 g
Trial Duration Range 12 months · 4 weeks · 30 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (5 g · 7.5 g/day · 4.9 g) over a structured 12 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule
Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 07:30
Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water
Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
inflammation (PubMed clinical endpoint)
gut (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is FOS (Fructooligosaccharides) & Why Does Form Matter?

FOS (Fructooligosaccharides) is classified under PROBIOTICS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (5 g, 7.5 g/day, 4.9 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for FOS (Fructooligosaccharides) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, FOS (Fructooligosaccharides) acts on pathways governing intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns FOS (Fructooligosaccharides) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 1 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 732 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41010499 (2025) — "A Systematic Review Evaluating the Impact of Fibre Supplementation on Gut Health and Other Clinical Outcomes in Adults with Haematological Malignancies During Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation." (Conclusions: Fibre supplementation represents a promising adjunctive strategy to improve clinical outcomes in adults with HMs undergoing HCT, by improving microbial diversity, increasing short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and reducing incidence of acute GVHD.) • PMID:40516031 (2026) — "Impact of non-digestible carbohydrates and prebiotics on immunity, infections, inflammation and vaccine responses: a systematic review of evidence in healthy humans and a discussion of mechanistic proposals." (Yeast β-glucan and GOS supplementation resulted in improvements in NK cell activity.) • PMID:40077758 (2025) — "Impacts of Yacon Syrup (Smallanthus sonchifolius) on Human Health: A Systematic Review of Scientific Evidence from the Last Decade." (CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the potential of yacon syrup as a functional supplement for metabolic and gastrointestinal health.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule. Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 5 g · 7.5 g/day · 4.9 g · 0.45 g over 12 months · 4 weeks · 30 days · 2 weeks. Optimal timing window: AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water (Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for FOS (Fructooligosaccharides), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (5 g · 7.5 g/day · 4.9 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 16 Quantitative Analyses

01
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Nutrients (2025) PMID: 41010499 ↗
A Systematic Review Evaluating the Impact of Fibre Supplementation on Gut Health and Other Clinical Outcomes in Adults with Haematological Malignancies During Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Nutrients involving n = 25 participants. Key conclusion: Conclusions: Fibre supplementation represents a promising adjunctive strategy to improve clinical outcomes in adults with HMs undergoing HCT, by improving microbial diversity, increasing short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and reducing incidence of acute GVHD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Gut health is often disrupted in adults with haematological malignancies (HMs) receiving chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Microbial diversity is reduced, and both infection risk and inflammation increased. The role of dietary fibre in enhancing gut health, immune regulation, reducing complications, and improving clinical outcomes for people with HMs shows promise but the extent of their role remains unclear. Objectives: This systematic review evaluated the role of dietary fibre supplementation in adults with HMs undergoing HCT on gut health, immune function, and gastrointestinal health. This included assessment of differences between fibre types. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, independently by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Results: Of the 5023 studies after de-duplication, 63 remained after abstract and title screening, 59 studies were full-text screened, 56 studies were excluded due to language (n = 6), wrong intervention (n = 25), wrong population (n = 4), or reporting on unrelated outcomes (n = 21), and 3 studies met all inclusion criteria. Interventions included fructooligosaccharides (FOS), resistant starch (RS), and a glutamine, fibre, and oligosaccharide (GFO) prebiotic blend. Despite heterogeneity in measured outcomes, positive impacts on gut health, immune function, and gastrointestinal health were shown. Conclusions: Fibre supplementation represents a promising adjunctive strategy to improve clinical outcomes in adults with HMs undergoing HCT, by improving microbial diversity, increasing short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and reducing incidence of acute GVHD. Further research is needed to establish specific recommendations for fibre in the nutritional management of patients with HM.

02
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Critical reviews in food science and nutrition (2026) PMID: 40516031 ↗
Impact of non-digestible carbohydrates and prebiotics on immunity, infections, inflammation and vaccine responses: a systematic review of evidence in healthy humans and a discussion of mechanistic proposals.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. Key conclusion: Yeast β-glucan and GOS supplementation resulted in improvements in NK cell activity.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Prebiotics, particularly non-digestible carbohydrates (NDCs), are increasingly recognized for their role in modulating immune responses in the gut, lungs, and urinary tract. This review systematically evaluates evidence from human studies on the effects of NDCs and prebiotics on immune markers, infection risk and severity, inflammation, and vaccine responses. Prebiotics such as inulin, galactooligosaccharides (GOS), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS) positively influence gut microbiota by promoting beneficial species like Bifidobacteria. They also enhance the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) like butyrate, which interact with immune cells via G-protein-coupled receptors, inducing anti-inflammatory effects. In addition to microbiota-mediated mechanisms, NDCs and prebiotics may directly affect immune and epithelial cells by interacting with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), enhancing gut barrier function, and modulating immunity. A systematic review of human studies showed that prebiotics, including GOS, FOS, and 2'-fucosyllactose (2FL), reduced infections and increased IgA in healthy infants, while yeast β-glucan reduced respiratory infection symptoms in healthy adults. Yeast β-glucan and GOS supplementation resulted in improvements in NK cell activity. Some effects on vaccine efficacy were noted in young adults, but the overall impact of NDCs and prebiotics on vaccination and systemic inflammation was inconsistent. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms involved and to optimize health applications.

03
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Nutrients (2025) PMID: 40077758 ↗
Impacts of Yacon Syrup (Smallanthus sonchifolius) on Human Health: A Systematic Review of Scientific Evidence from the Last Decade.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Nutrients involving n = 161 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the potential of yacon syrup as a functional supplement for metabolic and gastrointestinal health.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Yacon syrup (Smallanthus sonchifolius) has gained attention due to its high concentration of fructooligosaccharides (FOSs) and associated health benefits. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of yacon syrup on metabolic parameters and intestinal health in humans over the last decade. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search in databases, including Medline (PubMed), Science Direct, Embase, Scopus, and SciELO, up to October 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on clinical trials examining the impact of yacon syrup on glycemic control, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, appetite regulation, and gut microbiota in healthy, overweight, or obese individuals. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 161 participants from diverse populations. RESULTS: Yacon syrup supplementation demonstrated significant reductions in fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and LDL cholesterol, alongside improvements in satiety and intestinal transit time. Acute supplementation with yacon syrup had inconsistent results for postprandial glycemia and insulin levels, probably due to prior individual gut microbiota composition. Longer interventions with yacon syrup were associated with enhanced microbiota modulation and appetite regulation, particularly in women. Mild gastrointestinal discomfort was reported, but with the continued use of yacon syrup, the symptoms decreased. Yacon syrup presents promising health benefits, including improved insulin sensitivity, weight management, and gut health. However, further research is needed to establish optimal dosing and long-term safety. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the potential of yacon syrup as a functional supplement for metabolic and gastrointestinal health.

04
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Journal of the science of food and agriculture (2025) PMID: 39812321 ↗
Potential effects of prebiotic fibers on dental caries: a systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Journal of the science of food and agriculture involving n = 14 participants. Key conclusion: In conclusion, certain dietary fibers may help limit caries development by modulating biofilm and pH levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Certain dietary fibers exhibit prebiotic effects on gut microbiota, but their influence on oral health remains unclear. This study conducted a systematic review across four databases to examine the potential effects of dietary fibers on dental caries. Data selection and extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. From 962 found titles, twenty studies were included, of which 13 were in vitro. The substances identified as prebiotics included fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), inulin, pectin, raffinose, polydextrose, sialyllactose, and short-chain fatty acids. Outcomes were assessed at biofilm (n = 14), saliva (n = 5), and tooth (n = 1) levels, with only six studies evaluating pH changes. Fifteen studies (75%) reported potential benefits, primarily attributed to the capacity of prebiotic fibers to limit the growth or adhesion of bacteria. Only two studies (10%) reported an increase in pH. Overall, the quality of the evidence was judged as moderate. In conclusion, certain dietary fibers may help limit caries development by modulating biofilm and pH levels. However, further clinical studies are needed to confirm the protective role of dietary fibers in dental caries. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

05
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The Journal of nutrition (2025) PMID: 39486521 ↗
Microbiota-Focused Dietary Approaches to Support Health: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in The Journal of nutrition. Key conclusion: With advances in sequencing technologies and culturing techniques, other novel functional intestinal microorganisms are being increasingly identified and studied to determine how they may underpin human health benefits.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Diet affects the intestinal microbiota. Increasingly, research is linking the intestinal microbiota to various human health outcomes. Consumption of traditional prebiotics (inulin, fructo-oligosaccharides, and galacto-oligosaccharides) confers health benefits through substrate utilization by select intestinal microorganisms, namely Bifidobacterium and Lactobacilli spp. A similar but distinct concept focused on microorganisms to support human health is through direct consumption of certain live microorganisms recognized as probiotics, which classically include Lactobacilli or Bifidobacterium strains. With advances in sequencing technologies and culturing techniques, other novel functional intestinal microorganisms are being increasingly identified and studied to determine how they may underpin human health benefits. These novel microorganisms are targeted for enrichment within the autochthonous intestinal microbiota through dietary approaches and are also gaining interest as next-generation probiotics because of their purported beneficial properties. Thus, characterizing dietary approaches that nourish select microorganisms in situ is necessary to propel biotic-focused research forward. As such, we reviewed the literature to summarize findings on dietary approaches that nourish the human intestinal microbiota and benefit health to help fill the gap in knowledge on the connections between certain microorganisms, the metabolome, and host physiology. The overall objective of this systematic review was to summarize the impact of dietary interventions with the propensity to nourish certain intestinal bacteria, affect microbial metabolite concentrations, and support gastrointestinal, metabolic, and cognitive health in healthy adults. Findings from the 17 randomized controlled studies identified in this systematic review indicated that dietary interventions providing dietary fibers, phytonutrients, or unsaturated fatty acids differentially enriched Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, and Ruminococcus species, with variable effects on microbial metabolites and subsequent associations with physiologic markers of gastrointestina

06
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Life sciences (2024) PMID: 38408636 ↗
The effect of microbiome therapy on COVID-19-induced gut dysbiosis: A narrative and systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Systematic Review published in Life sciences involving n = 19 participants. Key conclusion: SIGNIFICANCE: The insights gleaned from this review significantly contribute to our broader comprehension of the therapeutic potential of biotics in addressing COVID-19-related gut dysbiosis and mitigating secondary multi-organ complications.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: Emerging evidence highlights the role of COVID-19 in instigating gut dysbiosis, with repercussions on disease severity and bidirectional gut-organ communication involving the lung, heart, brain, and liver. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in addressing gut dysbiosis associated with COVID-19, as well as their impact on related disease severity and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically review 27 studies exploring the efficacy of different microbiome-modulating therapies: probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation as potential interventions for COVID-19. KEY FINDINGS: The probiotics and synbiotics investigated encompassed a spectrum of eight bacterial and fungal genera, namely Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Bacillus, Saccharomyces, and Kluyveromyces. Noteworthy prebiotics employed in these studies included chestnut tannin, galactooligosaccharides, fructooligosaccharides, xylooligosaccharide, and resistant dextrin. The majority of the investigated biotics exhibited positive effects on COVID-19 patients, manifesting in symptom alleviation, inflammation reduction, and notable decreases in mortality rates. Five studies reported death rates, showing an average mortality ranging from 0 % to 11 % in the intervention groups, as compared to 3 % to 30 % in the control groups. Specifically, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics demonstrated efficacy in diminishing the duration and severity of symptoms while significantly accelerating viral and symptomatic remission. FMT emerged as a particularly effective strategy, successfully restoring gut microbiota and ameliorating gastrointestinal disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: The insights gleaned from this review significantly contribute to our broader comprehension of the therapeutic potential of biotics in addressing COVID-19-related gut dysbiosis and mitigating secondary multi-organ complications.

07
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2023) PMID: 37753791 ↗
Prebiotics for people with cystic fibrosis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Key conclusion: AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review did not find any evidence for the use of prebiotics in people with CF.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multisystem disease; the importance of growth and nutritional status is well established given their implications for lung function and overall survivability. Furthermore, it has been established that intestinal microbial imbalance and inflammation are present in people with CF. Oral prebiotics are commercially available substrates that are selectively utilised by host intestinal micro-organisms and may improve both intestinal and overall health. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of prebiotics for improving health outcomes in children and adults with CF. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of last search: 19 October 2022. We also searched PubMed and online trials registries. Date of last search: 13 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing the efficacy of prebiotics in children and adults with CF. We planned to only include the first treatment period from cross-over RCTs, regardless of washout period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We did not identify any relevant trials. MAIN RESULTS: We did not identify any relevant trials for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review did not find any evidence for the use of prebiotics in people with CF. Until such evidence is available, it is reasonable for clinicians to follow any local guidelines and to discuss the use of dietary prebiotics with their patients. Large and robust RCTs assessing the dietary prebiotics of inulin or galacto-oligosaccharides or fructo-oligosaccharides, or any combination of these, are needed. Such studies should be of at least 12 months in duration and assess outcomes such as growth and nutrition, gastrointestinal symptoms, pulmonary exacerbations, lung function, inflammatory biomarkers, hospitalisations, intestinal microbial profiling, and faecal short-chain fatty acids. Trials should include both children and adults and aim to be adequately powered to allow for s

08
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of biological macromolecules (2023) PMID: 36828085 ↗
Co-production of levan with other high-value bioproducts: A review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Systematic Review published in International journal of biological macromolecules. Key conclusion: This paper offers a systematic review of important aspects regarding recent strategies involving the simultaneous synthesis of levan and other bioproducts of aggregate value reported to date and discusses the challenges and opportunities for its large-scale production and applica
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Levan is a homopolysaccharide of fructose that has both scientific and industrial importance, with various applications in health, pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industries. Despite its broad spectrum of uses, there are only a limited number of commercial levan sources due to the high costs related to its production. To make production economically viable, efforts have been concentrated on the selection of levan-producing microorganisms, the genetic manipulation of new strains, and the use of inexpensive agro-industrial byproducts as substrates. Another efficient strategy involves the concomitant synthesis of other products with high market value and as such, the successful co-production of levan was demonstrated with fructooligosaccharides, ethanol, sorbitol, poly-ε-lysine, poly-γ-glutamic acid and polyhydroxyalkanoates. This paper offers a systematic review of important aspects regarding recent strategies involving the simultaneous synthesis of levan and other bioproducts of aggregate value reported to date and discusses the challenges and opportunities for its large-scale production and applications.

09
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Nutrients (2022) PMID: 36432622 ↗
The Impact of Prebiotic, Probiotic, and Synbiotic Supplements and Yogurt Consumption on the Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia among Adults: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Systematic Review published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: We found little evidence to suggest that prebiotic or probiotic supplements are associated with significant decreases in CRC occurrence.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Prebiotic and probiotic supplementation and yogurt consumption (a probiotic food) alter gut microbial diversity, which may influence colorectal carcinogenesis. This systematic review evaluates the existing literature on the effect of these nutritional supplements and yogurt consumption on colorectal neoplasia incidence among adults. We systematically identified ten randomized controlled trials and observational studies in adults age ≥ 18 without baseline gastrointestinal disease. Prebiotics included inulin, fructooligosaccharides, galactooligosaccharides, xylooligosaccharides, isomaltooligosaccharides, and β-glucans. Probiotics included bacterial strains of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Saccharomyces, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Bacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and Escherichia coli. Synbiotic supplements, a mixture of both prebiotic and probiotic supplements, and yogurt, a commonly consumed dietary source of live microbes, were also included. We defined colorectal neoplasia as colorectal adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, and colorectal cancer (CRC). Overall, findings suggest a moderate decrease in risk of adenoma and CRC for high levels of yogurt consumption compared to low or no consumption. Prebiotic supplementation was not associated with colorectal neoplasia risk. There was some evidence that probiotic supplementation may be associated with lower risk of adenomas but not with CRC incidence. Higher yogurt consumption may be associated with lower incidence of colorectal neoplasia. We found little evidence to suggest that prebiotic or probiotic supplements are associated with significant decreases in CRC occurrence.

10
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2022) PMID: 36014803 ↗
Effect of Fructooligosaccharides Supplementation on the Gut Microbiota in Human: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to explore the effect of FOS on gut microbiota and to evaluate the adverse effects of FOS intake on the gastrointestinal tract.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Numerous studies have investigated the effects of the supplementation of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) on the number of bacteria in the gut that are good for health, but the results have been inconsistent. Additionally, due to its high fermentability, supplementation of FOS may be associated with adverse gastrointestinal symptoms such as bloating and flatulence. Therefore, we assessed the effects of FOS interventions on the composition of gut microbiota and gastrointestinal symptoms in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Design: All randomized controlled trials published before 10 July 2022 that investigated the effects of FOS supplementation on the human gut microbiota composition and gastrointestinal symptoms and met the selection criteria were included in this study. Using fixed or random-effects models, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the two groups before and after the intervention were combined into weighted mean differences using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eight studies containing 213 FOS supplements and 175 controls remained in this meta-analysis. Bifidobacterium spp. counts significantly increased during FOS ingestion (0.579, 95% CI: 0.444−0.714) in comparison with that of the control group. Subgroup analysis showed greater variation in Bifidobacterium spp. in adults (0.861, 95% CI: 0.614−1.108) than in infants (0.458, 95% CI: 0.297−0.619). The increase in Bifidobacterium spp. counts were greater in the group with an intervention duration greater than 4 weeks (0.841, 95% CI: 0.436−1.247) than an intervention time less than or equal to four weeks (0.532, 95% CI: 0.370−0.694), and in the group with intervention doses > 5 g (1.116, 95% CI: 0.685−1.546) the counts were higher than those with doses ≤ 5 g (0.521, 95% CI: 0.379−0.663). No differences in effect were found between FOS intervention and comparators in regard to the abundance of other prespecified bacteria or adverse gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to explore the effect of FOS on gut microbiota and to evaluate the adverse effects of FOS intake on the gastrointestinal tract. FOS supplementation could inc

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category