NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

L-Arginine

AMINO ACIDS · Evidence Monograph

L-Arginine is an evidence-graded amino acids monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (8 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 7,359 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 8 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 7,359
Reported Trial Dosages 1400 mg · 800 mg · 194.70 g
Trial Duration Range 60 days · 7 days · 4 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1400 mg · 800 mg · 194.70 g) over a structured 60 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer
Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime
Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary amino acids clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (21 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (5 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (8 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is L-Arginine & Why Does Form Matter?

L-Arginine is classified under AMINO ACIDS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1400 mg, 800 mg, 194.70 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for L-Arginine frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, L-Arginine acts on pathways governing neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns L-Arginine an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 8 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 7,359 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40789388 (2025) — "Does l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake reduce blood pressure in middle-aged and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (These findings provide new dietary recommendations for BP management in the elderly, suggesting that dietary interventions can effectively improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).) • PMID:40022955 (2025) — "The effects of nutritional supplementation for children and adolescents with sickle cell disease: A systematic review and meta-analyses." (These supplements are often affordable and can contribute towards the reduction of opioid use and shorten patients' hospital stays - especially in low/middle-income countries where resources are scarce.) • PMID:39800868 (2025) — "L-Arginine and L-Citrulline for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: L-arginine may be promising for pre-eclampsia prevention and treatment, but findings should be interpreted cautiously.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 398008680.23 (0.09–0.55)PMID 387752551.33 (0.4–4.37)PMID 356672670.49 (0.45–0.97)0.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer. Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1400 mg · 800 mg · 194.70 g · 134.00 g over 60 days · 7 days · 4 days · 4 weeks. Optimal timing window: AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime (Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for L-Arginine, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1400 mg · 800 mg · 194.70 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 60 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 21 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2025) PMID: 40789388 ↗
Does l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake reduce blood pressure in middle-aged and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 415 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.002. Key conclusion: These findings provide new dietary recommendations for BP management in the elderly, suggesting that dietary interventions can effectively improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the effects of l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake on blood pressure (BP) in middle-aged and elderly individuals. METHODS: Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software, employing a random effects model to statistically analyze the pooled effect sizes of the obtained systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) data. Results are reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). RESULTS: A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake on BP in middle-aged and elderly individuals were included, comprising 24 datasets involving 415 participants. The results indicate that l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake significantly reduced SBP (-4.02 mmHg [95 % CI: -6.54 to -1.50], P = 0.002) and DBP (-2.54 mmHg [95 % CI: -4.27 to -0.81], P = 0.004) in the elderly. Subgroup analysis showed that the combined supplementation of l-citrulline and l-arginine significantly decreased SBP (-10.44 mmHg [95 % CI: -13.57 to -7.31], P < 0.00001) and DBP (-4.86 mmHg [95 % CI: -7.93 to -1.79], P = 0.002) in this population. CONCLUSION: l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake overall lowered BP in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Subgroup analysis indicates that the combined supplementation of l-citrulline and l-arginine is superior to l-citrulline or watermelon supplementation alone. These findings provide new dietary recommendations for BP management in the elderly, suggesting that dietary interventions can effectively improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

02
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) (2025) PMID: 40022955 ↗
The effects of nutritional supplementation for children and adolescents with sickle cell disease: A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) involving n = 2,058 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: These supplements are often affordable and can contribute towards the reduction of opioid use and shorten patients' hospital stays - especially in low/middle-income countries where resources are scarce.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sickle cell disease (SCD), a neglected chronic genetic blood disorder that severely impacts the pediatric population, often leading to premature death, is associated with compromised nutritional status. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of nutritional supplementation in SCD-related complications. METHODS: A systematic review with searches in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing diet or supplements as complementary therapy for children and adolescents with SCD were included (PROSPERO:CRD42024532369). The data for outcomes of interest (efficacy, safety) were pooled by means of pairwise and network meta-analyses with ranking (p-score) analysis. The results were presented as odds ratio or mean differences with 95 % confidence intervals (NMAstudio2.0). RESULTS: Twenty RCTs were included (2002-2023) (n = 2058), analyzing 9 dietary supplements on different regimens. All patients were in use of hydroxyurea as active treatment. Supplementation with fatty acids (n = 3 studies) and l-arginine (n = 4) presented higher efficacy and safety, significantly improving pain intensity, vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) and inflammation when compared to usual care/placebo (p < 0.05). Vitamin D3 (n = 6) at different dosages may reduce respiratory complications and length of hospital stay, yet further studies are needed to confirm its significant effects. Evidence is limited and of poor quality regarding the effects of add-on vitamin A (n = 2), magnesium sulfate (n = 2) and zinc (n = 4) for this population. CONCLUSIONS: The complementary use of certain supplements (fatty acids, l-arginine, vitamin D3) can enhance the management of VOC and improve patients' physiological functions. These supplements are often affordable and can contribute towards the reduction of opioid use and shorten patients' hospital stays - especially in low/middle-income countries where resources are scarce. Although further studies are needed to refine these findings (e.g., appropriate doses/regimens), practical guidelines and decision-makers may benefit from updated evidence.

03
META-ANALYSIS BJOG (2025) PMID: 39800868 ↗
L-Arginine and L-Citrulline for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in BJOG involving n = 2,028 participants (RR 0.23). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: L-arginine may be promising for pre-eclampsia prevention and treatment, but findings should be interpreted cautiously.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests L-arginine may be effective at reducing pre-eclampsia and related outcomes. However, whether L-arginine can prevent or only treat pre-eclampsia, and thus the target population and timing of initiation, remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of L-arginine and L-citrulline (precursor of L-arginine) on the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus and the Cochrane Library were searched through 7 February 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials administering L-arginine or L-citrulline to pregnant women, with the comparison group receiving placebo or standard care, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Meta-analyses were conducted separately for prevention or treatment trials, using random-effects models. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (2028 women) and three non-randomised trials (189 women) were included. The risk of bias was 'high' in eight RCTs and showed 'some concerns' in 12. In prevention trials, L-arginine was associated with a reduced risk of pre-eclampsia (relative risk [RR] 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35, 0.78; low-certainty evidence, four trials) and severe pre-eclampsia (RR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09, 0.55; low-certainty evidence, three trials). In treatment trials, L-arginine may reduce mean systolic blood pressure (MD -5.64 mmHg; 95% CI, -10.66, -0.62; very low-certainty evidence, three trials) and fetal growth restriction (RR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26, 0.81; low-certainty evidence, two trials). Only one study (36 women) examined L-citrulline and reported no effect on pre-eclampsia or blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: L-arginine may be promising for pre-eclampsia prevention and treatment, but findings should be interpreted cautiously. More trials are needed to determine the optimal dose and time to commence supplementation and support clinical decision-making. © 2025 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2024) PMID: 39796467 ↗
Effects of Different Dietary Supplements on Swimming Performance: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients (SMD -1.66). Key conclusion: Creatine_NaHCO3 was distinguished as the optimal approach for improving blood pH.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Nutritional supplements are widely used by swimmers, but the effectiveness of various supplements and the identification of the most effective intervention require further investigation. PURPOSE: This paper evaluated and compared the effectiveness of various nutrition-based interventions on swimming performance through both direct and indirect comparisons. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus databases were thoroughly searched up to 4 April 2024. The risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A random-effect model was adopted to compute standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: L-arginine (Arg) demonstrated superior performance to the placebo (SMD = -1.66, 95% CI [-2.92, -0.44]), emerging as the most effective intervention for reducing 100 swimming time (SUCRA = 89.5%). Beta-alanine (BA) was the best intervention for improving blood lactate (SUCRA = 80%). Creatine combined with sodium bicarbonate (Creatine_NaHCO3) significantly increased blood pH compared to the placebo (SMD = 3.79, 95% CI [1.85, 5.80]), with a SUCRA score of 99.9%, suggesting it is the most effective intervention for this parameter. No prominent differences were noted among the interventions in 50 m time, 200 m time, heart rate, and body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary supplements might provide benefits for improving swimming performance. Arg emerged as the most efficacious modality for reducing 100 m time. BA proved to be the preeminent strategy for decreasing blood lactate. Creatine_NaHCO3 was distinguished as the optimal approach for improving blood pH.

05
META-ANALYSIS BMC cardiovascular disorders (2024) PMID: 39538180 ↗
L-arginine impact on inflammatory and cardiac markers in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in BMC cardiovascular disorders (MD -0.61). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that L-arginine may benefit patients undergoing CABG, as it helps reduce inflammatory reactions and limits myocardial ischemia.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have explored the effects of L-arginine, whether administered in the form of a supplement or through infusion during cardioplegia, on cardiac and inflammatory markers in individuals undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, these studies presented contradictory findings. Consequently, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of l-arginine on these markers by analyzing available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We performed an extensive search across various databases, including Embase, Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, covering research published until December 2023. To analyze the mean changes in inflammatory and cardiac markers between the L-arginine and control groups, we calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 393 RCTs were identified during the initial search. After screening and selection, 7 trials were included. In a meta-analysis of three trials that reported troponin T levels, we found a significant impact of L-arginine on reducing troponin T levels (WMD = -0.61 ng/ml; 95% CI: -1.07, -0.15). Our analysis also showed that L-arginine had a noticeable impact on decreasing interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels (WMD = -7.72 pg/ml; 95% CI: -15.05, -0.39). However, we found no considerable impact of L-arginine treatment on creatine phosphokinase-MB (CPK-MB), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and troponin I compared to the placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that L-arginine may benefit patients undergoing CABG, as it helps reduce inflammatory reactions and limits myocardial ischemia. This study registered in the PROSPERO database (Registration No. CRD42024508341). © 2024. The Author(s).

06
META-ANALYSIS The journal of sexual medicine (2024) PMID: 39279185 ↗
Nutraceutical interventions for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in The journal of sexual medicine involving n = 1,000 participants. Key conclusion: On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Although nutraceutical-based treatments are often offered for erectile dysfunction (ED), their efficacy remains doubtful, and the choice of one substance over the other is challenged by the dearth of head-to-head comparative studies. AIM: We aimed to compare the efficacy of available nutraceutical interventions, alone or in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), in improving erectile function in men with ED through a network meta-analysis (NMA), which incorporates direct and indirect evidence into one model thus generating a hierarchy of effectiveness. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of any nutraceutical regimen in improving erectile function when compared to each other, placebo, and/or PDE5i in men with ED. Data were included in a random-effects NMA, where efficacy of treatments was ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Two NMAs were also conducted separately for organic and non-organic ED. Reciprocal comparisons between all treatments were analyzed by league tables. OUTCOMES: The main outcome was the standardized mean difference in the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 or IIEF-6. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs provided information on 1000 men with ED. In the overall NMA, compared to placebo, the combination propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) + acetyl L-carnitine (ALC) + Sildenafil was associated with the highest SUCRA (97%) in improving erectile function score, followed by L-Arginine + Tadalafil (84%), Sildenafil (79%), Tadalafil (72%), and L-Arginine (52%). No other treatment regimen showed efficacy with statistical significance. In patients with organic ED, the efficacy of Sildenafil and Tadalafil was significantly improved by PLC + ALC and L-Arginine, respectively. On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This NMA contributes valuable insights into the potential of nutraceutical interventions for ED. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: We employed strict inclusion criteria relat

07
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024) PMID: 38775255 ↗
Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 1,609 participants (RR 1.33). Key conclusion: Vitamin C plus vitamin E may increase the risk of SCD-related complications (acute chest syndrome: RR 2.66, 95% CI 0.77 to
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) refers to a group of genetic disorders characterized by the presence of an abnormal haemoglobin molecule called haemoglobin S (HbS). When subjected to oxidative stress from low oxygen concentrations, HbS molecules form rigid polymers, giving the red cell the typical sickle shape. Antioxidants have been shown to reduce oxidative stress and improve outcomes in other diseases associated with oxidative stress. Therefore, it is important to review and synthesize the available evidence on the effect of antioxidants on the clinical outcomes of people with SCD. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antioxidant supplementation for improving health outcomes in people with SCD. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 15 August 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing antioxidant supplementation to placebo, other antioxidants, or different doses of antioxidants, in people with SCD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence, and reported according to Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS: The review included 1609 participants in 26 studies, with 17 comparisons. We rated 13 studies as having a high risk of bias overall, and 13 studies as having an unclear risk of bias overall due to study limitations. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence. Only eight studies reported on our important outcomes at six months. Vitamin C (1400 mg) plus vitamin E (800 mg) versus placebo Based on evidence from one study in 83 participants, vitamin C (1400 mg) plus vitamin E (800 mg) may not be better than placebo at reducing the frequency of crisis (risk ratio (RR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 2.18), the severity of pain (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.40 to 4.37), or adverse effects (AE), of which the most common were headache, nausea, fatigue, diarrhoea, and epigastric pain (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.00). Vitamin C plus vitamin E may increase the risk of SCD-related complications (acute chest syndrome: RR 2.66, 95% CI 0.77 to

08
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37686709 ↗
Dietary Supplements for Erectile Dysfunction: Analysis of Marketed Products, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Rational Use.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: A metanalysis identified some nutraceuticals, such as Panax ginseng, Tribulus terrestris and L-arginine, that are able to improve male sexual function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The use of nutraceutical products to enhance male sexual performance has a long history, especially with regard to the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Alternative treatments for ED are becoming increasingly popular, with growing interest from consumers, as well as increased revenue for manufacturers. Dietary supplements (DSs), which are a mixture of active ingredients, are mainly sold online. In randomized controlled trials, the molecules contained in DSs have demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness, or even have no evidence to support their use. However, none of the studies carried out provided sufficient evidence to consider these products a first-line therapy. Therefore, the combination of the various active ingredients, especially in relation to the daily dose, leaves doubts about the real effectiveness. In order to evaluate the potential efficacy of DS formulations, we analyzed the products marketed in Italy using a scoring approach. A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate the effect of DS and to detect the active ingredients able to improve erectile function-called effective ingredients (EIs)-and their minimal effective daily dose (mED). A metanalysis identified some nutraceuticals, such as Panax ginseng, Tribulus terrestris and L-arginine, that are able to improve male sexual function. Based on the scoring system, 2 (8%) supplements matched with the cluster of higher expected efficacy, 3 (12%) with the lower efficacy cluster and 20 (80%) matched with the criterion of no expected efficacy. DSs marketed in Italy are usually blends of many substances that are frequently employed at a negligible dose or without any evidence.

09
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37111214 ↗
Absence of Effects of L-Arginine and L-Citrulline on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Oxidative Stress in Response to Physical Exercise: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.24. Key conclusion: In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis found that L-Citrulline and L-Arginine did not influence inflammatory biomarkers and oxidative stress after exercise.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The repercussions on oxidative and inflammatory stress markers under the effects of arginine and citrulline in response to exercise are not fully reached. We completed a systematic review to investigate the effects of L-Citrulline or L-Arginine on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers following exercise. EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science databases were used to record the trials. This study includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs with subjects over 18 years old. Those under the intervention protocol consumed L-Citrulline or L-Arginine, and the controls ingested placebo. We recognized 1080 studies, but only 7 were included (7 studies in meta-analysis). We observed no difference between pre- vs. post-exercise for oxidative stress (subtotal = -0.21 [CI: -0.56, 0.14], p = 0.24, and heterogeneity = 0%. In the sub-group "L-Arginine" we found a subtotal = -0.29 [-0.71, 0.12], p = 0.16, and heterogeneity = 0%. For the "L-Citrulline" subgroup we observed a subtotal = 0.00 [-0.67, 0.67], p = 1.00, and heterogeneity was not applicable. No differences were observed between groups (p = 0.47), and I² = 0%) or in antioxidant activity (subtotal = -0.28 [-1.65, 1.08], p = 0.68, and heterogeneity = 0%). In the "L-Arginine" sub-group, we found a subtotal = -3.90 [-14.18, 6.38], p = 0.46, and heterogeneity was not applicable. For the "L-Citrulline" subgroup, we reported a subtotal = -0.22 [-1.60, 1.16], p = 0.75, and heterogeneity was not applicable. No differences were observed between groups (p = 0.49), and I² = 0%), inflammatory markers (subtotal = 8.38 [-0.02, 16.78], p = 0.05, and heterogeneity = 93%. Tests for subgroup differences were not applicable, and anti-inflammatory markers (subtotal = -0.38 [-1.15, 0.39], p = 0.34 and heterogeneity = 15%; testing for subgroup differences was not applicable). In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis found that L-Citrulline and L-Arginine did not influence inflammatory biomarkers and oxidative stress after exercise.

10
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) (2022) PMID: 35667267 ↗
l-arginine supplementation improved neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with hypertensive disorder or intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) (RR 0.49). Key conclusion: Additionally, intravenous infusion of l-arginine, but not oral administration, significantly increased birth weight in IUGR pregnancies with elevated NO concentrations, although the recommended amount should
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Previous research established that the availability of l-arginine affects placental vascular development and fetal growth. However, practical details associated with the effects of l-arginine supplementation on the neonatal outcomes of hypertensive disorder (HD) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) pregnancies are limited. METHODS: The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched for peer-reviewed literature published by September 30, 2021 to investigate the operational details of l-arginine supplementation in improving neonatal outcomes in complicated pregnancies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) of continuous variables, as well as the risk ratio (RR) for categorical variables were pooled by random-effects models. RESULTS: The results indicated that l-arginine supplementation increased the plasma nitric oxide (NO) concentrations in IUGR pregnancies (SMD: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.97; I2 = 0%), but decreased the risk of preeclampsia in HD mothers (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.76; I2 = 0%). Administration with l-arginine elevated birth weights both in hypertensive and IUGR pregnant women, with WMDs of 194.70 g (95% CI: 58.21, 331.20; I2 = 44.2%) and 134.00 g (95% CI: 43.53, 224.46; I2 = 42.4%), respectively. However, the intervention had no effect on gestational age except in HD pregnancies (WMD: 7.05 d; 95% CI: 3.16, 10.95; I2 = 36.5%). l-arginine administration during pregnancy significantly reduced the small for gestational age (SGA) risk of fetus both in HD (RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.83; I2 = 0.0%) and IUGR mothers (RR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.88; I2 = 0.0%). Subgroup analyses revealed that l-arginine supplementation at <4 g/d dosage or for ≥1-month duration or in the third trimester had a greater effect on birth weights in HD women without proteinuria, but a higher l-arginine dosage was more beneficial for extending gestational age and reducing the risk of SGA in older pregnancies. Additionally, intravenous infusion of l-arginine, but not oral administration, significantly increased birth weight in IUGR pregnancies with elevated NO concentrations, although the recommended amount should

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category