NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lactobacillus acidophilus

PROBIOTICS · Evidence Monograph

Lactobacillus acidophilus is an evidence-graded probiotics monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 27,639 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 7 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 27,639
Reported Trial Dosages 335 mg · 5 g/day · 250 mg
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 6 months · 2 months
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (335 mg · 5 g/day · 250 mg) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule
Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 07:30
Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water
Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary probiotics clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (21 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (7 RCTs · 6 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (9 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Lactobacillus acidophilus & Why Does Form Matter?

Lactobacillus acidophilus is classified under PROBIOTICS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (335 mg, 5 g/day, 250 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lactobacillus acidophilus frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (7 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lactobacillus acidophilus acts on pathways governing intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lactobacillus acidophilus an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 27,639 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40929652 (2026) — "Comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential in mental health benefits in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Some probiotics or combinations may offer benefits for patients with IBS in improving QoL, depression, and anxiety; however, as this is a developing field, additional research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, and specific stra) • PMID:40550754 (2025) — "Efficacy of a Probiotic Combination on Glycemic Index and Insulin Resistance in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (The current study suggests that the probiotic combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum is effective in reducing insulin resistance, improving glycemic index parameters, and improving pancreatic β-cell functioning in adults by impr) • PMID:38458507 (2024) — "Investigating the influence of probiotics in preventing Traveler's diarrhea: Meta-analysis based systematic review." (Only a few probiotics that reduce TD risk exist.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 40550754-1.05PMID 35758473-7.51 (-11.28–-3.73)-13Null (0)1.7Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule. Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 335 mg · 5 g/day · 250 mg over 12 weeks · 6 months · 2 months · 90 days. Optimal timing window: AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water (Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MINOR] Concomitant Prescription Medication: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:29257353). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (335 mg · 5 g/day · 250 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Concomitant Prescription Medication.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 21 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology (2026) PMID: 40929652 ↗
Comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential in mental health benefits in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology involving n = 3,154 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Some probiotics or combinations may offer benefits for patients with IBS in improving QoL, depression, and anxiety; however, as this is a developing field, additional research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, and specific stra
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The use of probiotics as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is gaining attention, with recent studies indicating that certain probiotics or combinations may have mental health benefits for patients with IBS. AIMS: To systematically review and meta-analyze, using network meta-analysis (NWM), the comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential on quality of life, depression, and anxiety in patients with IBS. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed, using a Bayesian NWM, to compare the performance of probiotics with mental health benefits in IBS treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using surfaces under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values. RESULTS: The analysis included 3154 participants assigned to nine different treatments: Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomyces, Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, Lactobacillus plantarum, probiotic combinations, and placebo. B. longum and probiotic combinations were found to be significantly more effective than placebo. In terms of improving quality of life (QoL), B. longum was the most effective (SUCRA = 89.7%), while L. plantarum was the least effective (SUCRA = 14.9%). For alleviating depression and anxiety, the combination of probiotics (SUCRA = 95.6%) and L. acidophilus (SUCRA = 74.2%) showed the best results, respectively. CONCLUSION: Some probiotics or combinations may offer benefits for patients with IBS in improving QoL, depression, and anxiety; however, as this is a developing field, additional research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, and specific strains that may be advantageous. More high-quality RCTs are needed to substantiate these therapeutic possibilities.

02
META-ANALYSIS Journal of dietary supplements (2025) PMID: 40550754 ↗
Efficacy of a Probiotic Combination on Glycemic Index and Insulin Resistance in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of dietary supplements involving n = 823 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (MD -1.05). Key conclusion: The current study suggests that the probiotic combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum is effective in reducing insulin resistance, improving glycemic index parameters, and improving pancreatic β-cell functioning in adults by impr
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Insulin resistance leads to increased glucose and insulin levels. Probiotics can reduce insulin resistance, but the presence of different probiotic strains and doses prevents the generalization to real-world scenario. The current systematic review and meta-analysis study investigated the efficacy of a triple probiotic combination (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum) on glycemic index and insulin resistance parameters in adults. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of the probiotics combination on glycemic index and insulin resistance parameters were identified. Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool were used for risk of bias assessment and RevMan for meta-analysis. Fourteen good-quality clinical trials were included in the current study. Low-to-moderate risk of bias was observed. Data from 823 participants were included. Probiotics supplementation significantly reduced insulin resistance (MD: -1.05 HOMA-IR score, p < 0.00001), serum glucose (MD: -3.99 mg/dl, p = 0.0003) and insulin levels (MD: -3.79 µIU/ml, p < 0.00001), while significantly improved insulin sensitivity (MD: +0.02 QUICKI score, p < 0.00001) and pancreatic β-cell functioning (MD: -14.71 HOMA-B score, p < 0.00001) compared to the control group. Significant heterogeneity was observed for all evaluation parameters (except the HOMA-B score) while no significant publication bias was observed. The current study suggests that the probiotic combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum is effective in reducing insulin resistance, improving glycemic index parameters, and improving pancreatic β-cell functioning in adults by improving the gastrointestinal microbiome.

03
META-ANALYSIS Travel medicine and infectious disease (2024) PMID: 38458507 ↗
Investigating the influence of probiotics in preventing Traveler's diarrhea: Meta-analysis based systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Travel medicine and infectious disease. Key conclusion: Only a few probiotics that reduce TD risk exist.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 10-40 million travelers get Traveler's Diarrhea (TD) yearly. A significant decrease in TD incidence has not been achieved by depending solely on antibiotic prophylaxis and educational initiatives. Using prebiotics to prevent TD has also not been examined in previous evaluations of probiotics for TD, which failed to consider the strain-specificity of probiotic efficacy. This review investigates the overall effects of probiotics on preventing TD, including the impact of dosage, duration, and age. METHODS: Standard literature databases were searched without restriction on publication year or language. The following criteria are included: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English or non-English unrestricted to publication year, excluding animal and observational studies. This systematic review applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Of the 166 screened papers, 10 RCTs were included. Lactobacillus acidophilus showed no efficacy in preventing TD except when mixed with other strains. Other genera of lactobacilli showed a protection rate of up to 39% against TD. Similarly, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardii have been effective in preventing TD. CONCLUSION: Studies investigating probiotics as a preventive measure for TD remain limited. Only a few probiotics that reduce TD risk exist. Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, specific probiotic strains, including L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. fermentum, S. cerevisiae, and S. boulardii, may prevent TD. The effect of additional probiotic strains on TD prevention must be further investigated.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Food & function (2024) PMID: 38456359 ↗
Comparison of the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation in glucose metabolism, lipid profile, inflammation and oxidative stress in pregnant women.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Food & function. Key conclusion: Conclusion: Multi-combination of probiotic strains, especially those strategies containing LABB, may be more effective than a single probiotic strain in glycolipid metabolism, inflammation, and oxidative stress of pregnant women.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Objective: The optimal probiotic supplementation in pregnant women has not been thoroughly evaluated. By employing a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach, we compared the effectiveness of different probiotic supplementation strategies for pregnant women. Methods: A comprehensive search across multiple databases was performed to identify studies comparing the efficacy of probiotic supplements with each other or the control (placebo) among pregnant women. Results: This NMA, including 32 studies, systematically evaluated 6 probiotic supplement strategies: Lactobacillus, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium (LRB), Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium (LABB), Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum (LLB), multi-combination of four probiotics (MP1), and multi-combination of six or more probiotics (MP2). Among these strategies, LLB, MP1, and MP2 all contain LABB. The NMA findings showed that MP1 was the most effective in reducing fasting blood sugar (FBS) (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA]: 80.5%). In addition, MP2 was the most efficacious in lowering the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SUCRA: 89.1%). LABB was ranked as the most effective in decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) (SUCRA: 95.5%), total cholesterol (TC) (SUCRA: 95.5%), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (SUCRA: 94.8%). Moreover, LLB was ranked as the most effective in raising total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SUCRA: 98.5%). Conclusion: Multi-combination of probiotic strains, especially those strategies containing LABB, may be more effective than a single probiotic strain in glycolipid metabolism, inflammation, and oxidative stress of pregnant women.

05
META-ANALYSIS Journal of infection and chemotherapy (2024) PMID: 37956795 ↗
Effects of probiotics in children with acute gastroenteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on probiotics utilized in Japan.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of infection and chemotherapy involving n = 878 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Although the certainty of evidence is very low, the use of probiotics for acute gastroenteritis in children may improve diarrhea approximately one day earlier.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Many randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have evaluated the use of probiotics to treat acute infectious gastroenteritis. However, most probiotic species evaluated in previous large randomized controlled trials are unavailable in Japan. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy of probiotics utilized in Japan for acute gastroenteritis. METHODS: The inclusion criterion was a randomized controlled study that compared probiotics with a placebo to treat children younger than 18 years with acute infectious gastroenteritis. We excluded studies that did not contain the following species available in Japan: Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus acidophilus, Enterococcus faecium, Clostridium butyricum, and Bacillus subtilis and studies in low- or lower-middle-income countries. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi from their inception to November 27, 2022. After the risk of bias assessment, data on diarrhea duration, number of hospitalizations, length of hospital stay, and adverse effects were extracted. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Diarrhea lasting longer than 48 h (7 articles, n = 878) was significantly lower in the probiotic group (risk ratio (RR) 0.70, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.83). The duration of diarrhea (14 articles; n = 1761) was 23.45 h (95 % CI 18.22-26.69) shorter in the probiotic group. Duration of hospitalization (6 articles; n = 971) was 17.73 h (95 % CI 6.9-28.56) shorter in the probiotic group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the certainty of evidence is very low, the use of probiotics for acute gastroenteritis in children may improve diarrhea approximately one day earlier. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42023405559).

06
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37686889 ↗
Outcome-Specific Efficacy of Different Probiotic Strains and Mixtures in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 9,253 participants. Key conclusion: Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 (SUCRA, 99.6%) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 (SUCRA, 89.7%) were among the most effective probiotics for improving the Bristol stool form scale of IBS-D.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disease. The efficacy of different probiotics in treating IBS remains controversial. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare and rank the outcome-specific efficacy of different probiotic strains or combinations in adults with IBS. We searched the literature up to June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of probiotics in IBS were included. A frequentist framework was used to perform this study. In total, 9253 participants from 81 RCTs were included in the study. Four probiotic strains and five mixtures were significantly superior to placebo in improving IBS Symptom Severity Scale, among which Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 ranked first (surface under the cumulative ranking, SUCRA, 92.9%). A mixture containing five probiotics (SUCRA, 100%) ranked first in improving the IBS-Quality of life. Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 (SUCRA, 96.9%) and Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 (SUCRA, 92.6%) were among the most effective probiotics for improving abdominal pain. Three probiotic strains and two mixtures were effective in alleviating abdominal bloating. Four probiotic strains and a mixture were significantly superior to placebo in reducing the bowel movement frequency in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 (SUCRA, 99.6%) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 (SUCRA, 89.7%) were among the most effective probiotics for improving the Bristol stool form scale of IBS-D. Only some probiotics are effective for particular outcomes in IBS patients. This study provided the first ranking of outcome-specific efficacy of different probiotic strains and combinations in IBS. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

07
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37049473 ↗
Effects of Probiotics on Glycemic Control and Metabolic Parameters in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 854 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Probiotic supplements may improve glycemic control and lipid profile and reduce neonatal birth weight in women with GDM.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of probiotic supplements on glycemic control and metabolic parameters in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was glycemic control, i.e., serum glucose and insulin levels. Secondary outcomes were maternal weight gain, neonatal birth weight, and lipid parameters. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used. Cochrane's Q test of heterogeneity and I2 were used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of the 843 papers retrieved, 14 (n = 854 women) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. When compared with placebo, women receiving probiotic supplements had significantly lower mean fasting serum glucose, fasting serum insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, total cholesterol, and VLDL levels. Decreased neonatal birth weight was witnessed in supplements containing Lactobacillus acidophilus. CONCLUSION: Probiotic supplements may improve glycemic control and lipid profile and reduce neonatal birth weight in women with GDM.

08
META-ANALYSIS Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (2022) PMID: 35758473 ↗
The Benefit of Probiotics in Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (MD -7.51). Key conclusion: The possible effect of probiotics on liver histology improvement in pediatric NAFLD should be examined in future studies.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a summary of the current literature about the efficacy of probiotics in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: A systematic literature search through major electronic databases was carried out for RCTs till September 9, 2021, investigating the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of pediatric patients with NAFLD. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and Standard Deviations (SD) were used to calculate continuous outcomes and a Risk Ratio with 95% CI was used for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 4 RCTs with 238 pediatric patients with NAFLD were included in the study. Probiotic supplementation revealed a statistically significant difference in transaminases' levels (ALT: WMD = -7.51 IU/L, 95% CI, -11.28 to -3.73, I 2 = 0%, P < 0.0001; AST: WMD = -6.46 IU/L, 95% CI, -9.31 to -3.61, I 2 = 0%, P < 0.00001), anthropometric characteristics, total cholesterol, triglycerides and ultrasonographic steatosis improvement. CONCLUSIONS: According to the data of this meta-analysis, probiotic supplementation, and especially supplementation of Lactobacillus acidophilus in combination with other strains of Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus may be beneficial in the improvement of transaminases', lipid parameters' levels, ultrasonographic, and anthropometric characteristics in children with NAFLD. Current evidence does not allow specifying the exact beneficial strain of probiotics mentioned above. The possible effect of probiotics on liver histology improvement in pediatric NAFLD should be examined in future studies.

09
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2021) PMID: 33435456 ↗
Probiotics for Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 10,664 participants (OR 0.04). Key conclusion: lactis Bb-12/B94 could reduce NEC risk with a different size effect according to feeding type.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence supports a role of probiotics in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the role of probiotics in preventing NEC in preterm infants, focusing on the differential effect of type of feeding, was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A random-effects model was used; a subgroup analysis on exclusively human milk (HM)-fed infants vs. infants receiving formula (alone or with HM) was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-one trials were included (10,664 infants, 29 probiotic interventions); 31 studies (19 different probiotic regimens) were suitable for subgroup analysis according to feeding. In the overall analysis, Lactobacillus acidophilus LB revealed the most promising effect for reducing NEC risk (odds ratio (OR), 0.03; 95% credible intervals (CrIs), 0.00-0.21). The subgroup analysis showed that Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12/B94 was associated with a reduced risk of NEC stage ≥2 in both feeding type populations, with a discrepancy in the relative effect size in favour of exclusively HM-fed infants (OR 0.04; 95% CrIs <0.01-0.49 vs. OR 0.32; 95% CrIs 0.10-0.36). CONCLUSIONS: B. lactis Bb-12/B94 could reduce NEC risk with a different size effect according to feeding type. Of note, most probiotic strains are evaluated in few trials and relatively small populations, and outcome data according to feeding type are not available for all RCTs. Further trials are needed to confirm the present findings.

10
META-ANALYSIS European review for medical and pharmacological sciences (2020) PMID: 33015812 ↗
Protective efficacy of probiotics on the treatment of acute rotavirus diarrhea in children: an updated meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in European review for medical and pharmacological sciences involving n = 1,624 participants (SMD -0.49). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics could reduce the occurrence of acute RVD in children, especially in Caucasian population.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aims to uncover the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics on acute rotavirus diarrhea (RVD) in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled studies reporting therapeutic efficacy of probiotics on acute RVD in children published before 1st June 2019 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The citations in all searched literature were manually examined. Data were extracted from eligible literature for calculating STD Mean Difference (SMD) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Subsequently, the association between therapeutic efficacy of probiotics and acute RVD in children was evaluated. Moreover, data were weighted by an inverse variance and analyzed by a fixed or random effect model. Heterogeneity test was applied in the enrolled literature. Sensitivity and publication bias was examined. STATA 12.0 was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 19 independent Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) involving 1,624 children with acute RVD were enrolled in this study. Three pieces of literature were excluded through sensitivity and publication bias analyses. Data extracted from eligible literature indicated that probiotics could markedly reduce the occurrence of acute RVD in children (SMD=-0.49, 95% CI=-0.74-0.25). Subgroup analysis conducted based on ethnicity uncovered a poor therapeutic efficacy of probiotics on reducing the occurrence of acute RVD in Asian children (SMD=-0.45, 95% CI=-0.94-0.04), which was markedly significant in Caucasian children (SMD=-0.54, 95% CI=-0.78--0.30). In addition, the subgroup analysis based on the probiotic subtypes found a pronounced efficacy of both Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMD=-0.67, 95% CI=-0.92-0.42) and non-Lactobacillus acidophilus probiotic (SMD=-0.45, 95% CI=-0.77-0.14) on the occurrence of acute RVD in children. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics could reduce the occurrence of acute RVD in children, especially in Caucasian population. Our findings still needed to be further validated in a multi-center institution with larger sample size and more qualified data.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category