NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lactobacillus reuteri

PROBIOTICS · Evidence Monograph

Lactobacillus reuteri is an evidence-graded probiotics monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 32,287 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (7 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 32,287
Reported Trial Dosages 37.5 mg · 50 mg/day · 440 mg/day
Trial Duration Range 4 weeks · 3 months · 84 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (37.5 mg · 50 mg/day · 440 mg/day) over a structured 4 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule
Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 07:30
Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water
Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary probiotics clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (22 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (5 RCTs · 7 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (9 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is Lactobacillus reuteri & Why Does Form Matter?

Lactobacillus reuteri is classified under PROBIOTICS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (37.5 mg, 50 mg/day, 440 mg/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lactobacillus reuteri frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lactobacillus reuteri acts on pathways governing intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lactobacillus reuteri an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (7 double-blind, n = 32,287 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41581709 (2026) — "Evaluating probiotic monotherapy in Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis." (pylori colonization and improve gastrointestinal symptoms, their effectiveness as a standalone therapy remains limited owing to low eradication rates and variability in study quality.) • PMID:40339531 (2025) — "The efficacy and acceptability of Lactobacillus reuteri for the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis." (reuteri alone did not improve depressive symptoms.) • PMID:37962097 (2024) — "Probiotics for infantile colic: Is there evidence beyond doubt? A meta-analysis and systematic review." (Exclusively breastfed infants have demonstrated more significant reduction in crying time.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 415817091.71 (1.24–2.36)PMID 371475910.87 (0.78–0.97)PMID 332956430.49PMID 417542040.16 (56.8–77.3)PMID 406182294.44 (1.04–19)PMID 224927641.21 (0.76–1.92)0.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule. Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 37.5 mg · 50 mg/day · 440 mg/day over 4 weeks · 3 months · 84 days · 25 days. Optimal timing window: AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water (Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MINOR] Concomitant Prescription Medication: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:29257353). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (37.5 mg · 50 mg/day · 440 mg/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 4 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Concomitant Prescription Medication.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 22 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Microbial pathogenesis (2026) PMID: 41581709 ↗
Evaluating probiotic monotherapy in Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Microbial pathogenesis; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (RR 1.712). Key conclusion: pylori colonization and improve gastrointestinal symptoms, their effectiveness as a standalone therapy remains limited owing to low eradication rates and variability in study quality.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotics in reducing H. pylori colonization in non-antibiotic interventions. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases and Google Scholar. Data analysis was performed using CMA (V4) and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), with evidence certainty evaluated via GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, probiotic monotherapy significantly reduced H. pylori colonization (RR = 1.712, 95 % CI: 1.240 to 2.364, I2 = 37.80, p = 0.001), but total eradication was 16.8 %. Among the probiotic strains, Lactobacillus reuteri showed higher efficacy (event rate = 0.377, 95 % CI: 0.123 to 0.722, I2 = 86.00). 4 weeks supplementation period yielded a stronger effect (event rate = 0.315, 95 % CI: 0.137 to 0.570, I2 = 78.18). Changes in 13C-UBT values, indicating bacterial load reduction, were significant (SMD = -0.617, p < 0.001, 95 % CI: -0.921 to -0.312, I2 = 86.50), while gastrointestinal symptom relief scores showed moderate improvement (SMD = -0.253, p = 0.012, 95 % CI: -0.451 to -0.055, I2 = 2.46). TSA validated that sufficient studies supported these findings, with evidence graded of moderate certainty. CONCLUSION: While probiotic monotherapy, particularly L. reuteri appears to reduce H. pylori colonization and improve gastrointestinal symptoms, their effectiveness as a standalone therapy remains limited owing to low eradication rates and variability in study quality. Further well-designed trials are required to establish their optimal role, particularly as supportive or adjunctive interventions.

02
META-ANALYSIS General hospital psychiatry (2025) PMID: 40339531 ↗
The efficacy and acceptability of Lactobacillus reuteri for the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in General hospital psychiatry involving n = 1,258 participants (OR 1.04). Key conclusion: reuteri alone did not improve depressive symptoms.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Some preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the positive effect of Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) supplementation on depressive symptoms. We conducted an updated systematic review on this topic. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and international trial registries were searched. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and animal experiments on the use of mixed probiotics containing L. reuteri in the treatment of depression. Analyses were done using Review Manager version 5.4 and Stata 18.0. RESULTS: In total, 12 RCTs including 1258 patients were included. The efficacy of the mixed probiotics containing L. reuteri in the treatment of depression was superior to the control group (SMD: -0.44, 95 %CI: -0.72 to -0.16). In terms of acceptability, there was no significant difference between the probiotic and control groups (OR: 1.04, 95 %CI: 0.75 to 1.45). In 9 animal experiments, mixed probiotics containing L. reuteri improved the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Subgroup analyses showed patients using multi-strain interventions (SMD: -0.56, 95 %CI: -0.97 to -0.15), having depressive symptoms (SMD: -0.39, 95 %CI: -0.74 to -0.03), and other clinical populations (SMD: -0.59, 95 %CI: -1.06 to -0.13), age < 60 years (SMD: -0.52, 95 %CI: -0.88 to -0.15), female patients (SMD: -0.45, 95 %CI: -0.78 to -0.13) may benefit more. CONCLUSION: Mixed probiotics containing L. reuteri ameliorated depressive symptoms in patients and depression-like behaviors in animals. Combined microbiota seems to be more effective than single strain intervention in the treatment of depression. Patients with depressive symptoms, other clinical populations, age < 60 years, female patients may benefit more from probiotics. L. reuteri alone did not improve depressive symptoms.

03
META-ANALYSIS Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway (2024) PMID: 37962097 ↗
Probiotics for infantile colic: Is there evidence beyond doubt? A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: Exclusively breastfed infants have demonstrated more significant reduction in crying time.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that employed probiotics and symbiotics for treating infantile colic. METHODS: We performed electronic systematic literature searches in Embase, PubMed and Web of Science, to identify articles published between 1950 and April 2023. Only RCT involving infants with infantile colic under 3 months were included. The treatment plan comprised 15 probiotics, which included Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and Bifidobacterium animalis lactis BB-12. The probiotics were administered alone or in combination with a prebiotic, vs. no intervention or a placebo. RESULTS: Probiotics resulted in an average reduction of 51 min of crying per day (p = 0.001). Further analysis of subgroups showed that the reduction was -39.30 min for vaginal delivery (p = 0.003), -64.66 min for Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (p = 0.03), -40.45 min for other strains (p < 0.00001), -74.28 min for exclusively breastfed infants (p = 0.0003) and -48.04 min for mixed feeding (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: All probiotic strains seem effective in treating infantile colic. Exclusively breastfed infants have demonstrated more significant reduction in crying time. However, the available evidence on the effectiveness of probiotics in formula-fed and caesarean-born infants is limited. © 2023 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

04
META-ANALYSIS JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition (2023) PMID: 37742098 ↗
Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 as a probiotic in preterm infants: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition involving n = 2,284 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (OR 0.34). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Very low CoE suggests that LR DSM 17938 may reduce NEC and LOS and shorten TFF in preterm infants.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Our previous strain-specific systematic review (SR) showed that Lactobacillus reuteri (LR) DSM 17938 reduces necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), late-onset sepsis (LOS), and time to full feeds (TFF) in preterm infants. Considering progress in the field over the past 6 years, we aimed to update our SR. METHODS: SR of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane CENTRAL, and gray literature were searched in June 2023. Primary outcomes were TFF, NEC stage ≥II, LOS, and all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was summarized using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied for outcome of NEC in RCTs. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs (n = 2284) and four non-RCTs (n = 1616) were included. Six RCTs and three non-RCTs were new. Meta-analysis of RCTs showed LR significantly reduced TFF (mean difference, -2.70 [95% CI, -4.90 to -1.31] days; P = 0.0001), NEC stage ≥II (risk ratio [RR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.37-0.87]; P = 0.009; eight RCTs), and LOS (RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54-0.97]; P = 0.03); but not mortality (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54-1.06]; P = 0.10). TSA showed diversity-adjusted required information size (DARIS) as 3624 for NEC. Overall CoE was "very low." Meta-analysis of non-RCTs showed LR reduced NEC (odds ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15-0.77]; P = 0.01) but not LOS. LR had no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Very low CoE suggests that LR DSM 17938 may reduce NEC and LOS and shorten TFF in preterm infants. Additional RCTs are required to confirm our findings. © 2023 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

05
META-ANALYSIS BMC gastroenterology (2023) PMID: 37147591 ↗
A systematic review and meta-analysis: the therapeutic and preventive effect of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17,938 addition in children with diarrhea.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in BMC gastroenterology involving n = 963 participants (RR 0.87). Key conclusion: Combining probiotics and improving the ability of probiotics to respond is the focus of attention.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the effect of adding Lactobacillus reuteri in the treatment plan for diarrheal disease in children, and analyze the potential of probiotics in preventing the occurrence of diarrheal disease. METHODS: Search for randomized controlled trials of Lactobacillus reuteri for the treatment and prevention of diarrhea in the Pubmed, Web of science, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Data such as the number of diarrhea patients, time, length of stay, clinical symptoms and effect of diarrhea prevention were extracted for meta-analysis. Relative risk and confidence interval (RR and 95% CI) were used as outcome indicators. RESULTS: 963 participants in the 9 RCTs came from multiple countries/regions. Compared with placebo/no intervention, the number of diarrhea patients in the Lactobacillus reuteri group was significantly reduced on the day 1 (RR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.78-0.97) and day 2 (RR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.44-0.83). Cumulative statistics analysis showed that the effect was stable and significant starting on the 4th day after treatment. A few studies have shown that Lactobacillus reuteri can reduce the time of diarrhea, the number of days with watery stools, and days of hospital stay. However, it has no effect on the occurrence of nosocomial diarrhea (RR = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.68-1.83), rotavirus diarrhea (RR = 1.46, 95%CI: 0.78-2.72), antibiotic-related diarrhea (RR = 1.76, 95%CI: 0.77-4.05), and diarrhea (RR = 1.35, 95%CI: 0.95-1.92). CONCLUSION: Addition of Lactobacillus reuteri in the treatment plan has a significant effect on reducing the number of diarrhea and reducing the symptoms of diarrhea, but has no obvious effect on the prevention of diarrhea. Combining probiotics and improving the ability of probiotics to respond is the focus of attention. © 2023. The Author(s).

06
META-ANALYSIS BMJ open (2022) PMID: 36600415 ↗
Efficacy of probiotics in the management of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in BMJ open; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (SMD -0.58). Key conclusion: The results of the biased assessment, limited data and heterogeneity of the clinical trials included might reduce the reliability of the conclusions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Halitosis is defined as a foul odour emitted from the oral cavity. Many interventions have been used to control halitosis from mouthwashes to chewing gums. Probiotics have been reported as an alternative method to alleviate halitosis. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the effect of probiotics on halitosis from a time perspective. DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a meta-analysis study performed in indexed databases up to February 2021. Randomised controlled trials that compared the effects of probiotics and placebo on primary outcomes (organoleptic (OLP) scores and volatile sulfur compound (VSC) levels) and secondary outcomes (tongue coating scores (TCS) and plaque index (PI)) were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Publication bias and leave-one-out analyses were performed. RESULTS: The standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI were calculated to synthesise data. The data were subgrouped and analysed in the short term (≤4 weeks) and long term (>4 weeks) based on the follow-up time. Seven articles were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes, OLP scores (SMD=-0.58; 95% CI -0.87 to -0.30, p<0.0001) and VSC levels (SMD=-0.26; 95% CI -0.51 to -0.01, p=0.04), both decreased significantly in the probiotics group compared with the placebo group in the short term. However, a significant reduction was observed only in OLP scores (SMD=-0.45; 95% CI -0.85 to -0.04, p=0.03) in the long term. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes. There was no evidence of publication bias. The leave-one-out analysis confirmed that the pooled estimate was stable. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this work, it seems that probiotics (eg, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus reuteri, Streptococcus salivarius and Weissella cibaria) may relieve halitosis in the short term (≤4 weeks). The results of the biased assessment, limited data and heterogeneity of the clinical trials included might reduce the reliability of the conclusions. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published

07
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2021) PMID: 34959871 ↗
Which Probiotic Is the Most Effective for Treating Acute Diarrhea in Children? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 13,443 participants (OR 0.23). Key conclusion: To be conclusive, Saccharomyces boulardii may be the most effective probiotic for treating acute diarrhea in children, followed by several other single-strain and multi-strain probiotics.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Acute diarrhea is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children under five. Probiotics are beneficial for treating acute diarrhea in children, but unclear which specific probiotic is the most effective. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to examine the comparative effectiveness of probiotics. By searching EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library up to 31 March 2021, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on probiotics for treating acute diarrhea in children were included. Primary outcomes included the duration of diarrhea and diarrhea lasting ≥2 days, and secondary outcomes included the mean stool frequency on day 2 and duration of hospitalization, fever, and vomiting. We assessed the certainty of the evidence of outcomes according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline. Eighty-four studies with twenty-one different interventions in 13,443 children were included. For the primary outcomes, moderate evidence indicated that, Lactobacillus reuteri [mean difference (MD) = -0.84 day; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.39, -0.29], Bifidobacterium lactis (MD = -0.98 day; 95%CI, -1.82, -0.14), Saccharomyces boulardii (MD = -1.25 day; 95%CI, -1.59, -0.91), Lactobacillus species (spp.) plus Bifidobacterium spp. plus Saccharomyces spp. (MD = -1.19 day; 95%CI, -1.81, -0.58), and Bacillus spp. plus Enterococcus spp. plus Clostridium spp. (MD = -1.1 day; 95%CI, -1.84, -0.35) significantly reduced the duration of diarrhea when compared with placebo. Saccharomyces boulardii [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.22; 95%CI, 0.11, 0.41] and Lactobacillus reuteri (OR = 0.23; 95%CI, 0.090, 0.60) significantly reduced the risk of diarrhea lasting ≥2 days when compared with placebo or no treatment, with moderate evidence. Among all probiotics, Saccharomyces boulardii may be the most effective in reducing both duration of diarrhea (compared with placebo) and risk of diarrhea lasting ≥2 days (compared with placebo or no treatment), with moderate evidence. To be conclusive, Saccharomyces boulardii may be the most effective probiotic for treating acute diarrhea in children, followed by several other single-strain and multi-strain probiotics.

08
META-ANALYSIS Complementary therapies in medicine (2021) PMID: 34627993 ↗
Evidence of Lactobacillus reuteri to reduce colic in breastfed babies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Complementary therapies in medicine involving n = 248 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The evidence shows that the administration of Lactobacillus reuteri to babies fed with breast milk reduces the crying time in babies diagnosed with colic.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To investigate evidence for the treatment of childhood colic by supplementing Lactobacillus reuteri in infants breastfed with breast milk. METHODS: The study was conducted according to the PRISMA protocol. The databases used for acquiring data were PubMed and Web of Science, applying MeSH terms and free terms. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata ™ 12.0. The risk of bias was evaluated by the Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 tool, and the strength of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Ten clinical trials were included in the review. The administration of L. reuteri (DSM 17938 or ATCC55730) was tested in infants (n = 248) versus the control/placebo group (n = 229). Eight articles were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant response in reducing crying time (minutes/day) and treatment effectiveness (reduction ≥ 50% in average daily crying time) in the first week (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). These results were similar in the second, third weeks (p < 0.001 for both outcomes) and fourth weeks (p<0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). The risk of bias was low for the majority of the studies. Confidence in evidence was considered very low for crying time and low for effectiveness treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence shows that the administration of Lactobacillus reuteri to babies fed with breast milk reduces the crying time in babies diagnosed with colic. But our confidence in the effect estimate is limited.

09
META-ANALYSIS Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents (2021) PMID: 34281304 ↗
Clinical effectiveness of Lactobacillus reuteri in the treatment of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents. Key conclusion: The use of LR can be clinically effective in terms of pocket depth reduction in the treatment of PD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

In the last decades, the presence of peri-implant diseases (PD) has increased. One of the therapies currently used is probiotics with Lactobacillus reuteri (LR). The aim of this article is to determinate, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the clinical effectiveness of LR in the treatment of PD. We searched the literature until January 2021, in the biomedical databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus, SIGLE, LILACS, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials. The selection criteria of the studies were: randomized controlled clinical trials, without language and time restriction, reporting the clinical effects (depth to probing, plaque index and bleeding index) of the LR in the PD treatment. The risk of study bias was analyzed through the Cochrane tool for randomized studies using Review Manager software. The search strategy resulted in 6 articles of which four investigated peri-implantitis and three peri-implant mucositis. All studies reported that there was a difference in the depth of the probing in the treatment of PD, in favor of the group using LR, though not always achieving significance. The use of LR can be clinically effective in terms of pocket depth reduction in the treatment of PD. Copyright 2020 Biolife Sas. www.biolifesas.org.

10
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) PMID: 33295643 ↗
Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 12,127 participants (RR 0.49). Key conclusion: BACKGROUND: Probiotics may be effective in reducing the duration of acute infectious diarrhoea.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Probiotics may be effective in reducing the duration of acute infectious diarrhoea. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of probiotics in proven or presumed acute infectious diarrhoea. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the trials register of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to 17 December 2019, as well as the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 12, 2019), in the Cochrane Library, and reference lists from studies and reviews. We included additional studies identified during external review. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing a specified probiotic agent with a placebo or no probiotic in people with acute diarrhoea that is proven or presumed to be caused by an infectious agent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently applied inclusion criteria, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were measures of diarrhoea duration (diarrhoea lasting ≥ 48 hours; duration of diarrhoea). Secondary outcomes were number of people hospitalized in community studies, duration of hospitalization in inpatient studies, diarrhoea lasting ≥ 14 days, and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: We included 82 studies with a total of 12,127 participants. These studies included 11,526 children (age < 18 years) and 412 adults (three studies recruited 189 adults and children but did not specify numbers in each age group). No cluster-randomized trials were included. Studies varied in the definitions used for "acute diarrhoea" and "end of the diarrhoeal illness" and in the probiotic(s) tested. A total of 53 trials were undertaken in countries where both child and adult mortality was low or very low, and 26 where either child or adult mortality was high. Risk of bias was high or unclear in many studies, and there was marked statistical heterogeneity when findings for the primary outcomes were pooled in meta-analysis. Effect size was similar in the sensitivity analysis and marked heterogeneity persisted. Publication bias was demonstrated from funnel plots for the main outcomes. In our main analysis of the primary outcomes in studies at low risk for all indices of risk of bias, no difference w

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category