NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2024

Melatonin (Low-dose 0.3mg)

OTHER · Evidence Monograph

Melatonin (Low-dose 0.3mg) is an evidence-graded other monograph evaluated across 19 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (0 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 301 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) Moderate (3.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 19 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 0 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 4 RCTs (3 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 301
Reported Trial Dosages 50mg · 20mg · 0.5mg
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 6 months · 4 weeks
Reading Time ~10 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 19 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE Moderate).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (50mg · 20mg · 0.5mg) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
pain (PubMed clinical endpoint)
liver (PubMed clinical endpoint)
heart (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Melatonin (Low-dose 0.3mg) & Why Does Form Matter?

Melatonin (Low-dose 0.3mg) is classified under OTHER and has been investigated across 19 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (50mg, 20mg, 0.5mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Melatonin (Low-dose 0.3mg) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (4 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Melatonin (Low-dose 0.3mg) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Melatonin (Low-dose 0.3mg) an overall evidence rating of GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) based on 19 PubMed studies: 0 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials (3 double-blind, n = 301 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:28283340 (2017) — "A prospective randomized, double-dummy trial comparing IV push low dose ketamine to short infusion of low dose ketamine for treatment of  pain in the ED." (CONCLUSION: Low-dose ketamine given as a short infusion is associated with significantly lower rates of feeling of unreality and sedation with no difference in analgesic efficacy in comparison to intravenous push.) • PMID:27373605 (2016) — "Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two different landiolol formulations in a healthy Caucasian group." (In addition, after administration of both formulations, the landiolol-induced heart rate reduction showed fast onset and dose dependence, whilst the decrease of systolic blood pressure occurred more slowly, was less pronounced, and dose independent.) • PMID:27206386 (2016) — "A Phase 1 clinical trial of a DNA vaccine for Venezuelan equine encephalitis delivered by intramuscular or intradermal electroporation." (Clinicaltrials.gov registry number NCT01984983.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 50mg · 20mg · 0.5mg · 2.0mg over 12 weeks · 6 months · 4 weeks · 10 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MODERATE] · (Zolpidem, Benzodiazepine) / Fluvoxamine: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:10796589). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (50mg · 20mg · 0.5mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking · (Zolpidem, Benzodiazepine) / Fluvoxamine.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (19 Studies) · 8 Quantitative Analyses

01
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The American journal of emergency medicine (2017) PMID: 28283340 ↗
A prospective randomized, double-dummy trial comparing IV push low dose ketamine to short infusion of low dose ketamine for treatment of  pain in the ED.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The American journal of emergency medicine involving n = 48 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.008. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Low-dose ketamine given as a short infusion is associated with significantly lower rates of feeling of unreality and sedation with no difference in analgesic efficacy in comparison to intravenous push.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Compare adverse effects and analgesic efficacy of low-dose ketamine for acute pain in the ED administered either by single intravenous push (IVP) or short infusion (SI). METHODS: Patients 18-65, presenting to ED with acute abdominal, flank, or musculoskeletal pain with initial pain score≥5, were randomized to ketamine 0.3mg/kg by either IVP or SI with placebo double-dummy. Adverse effects were evaluated by Side Effects Rating Scale for Dissociative Anesthetics (SERSDA) and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) at 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120min post-administration; analgesic efficacy was evaluated by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). RESULTS: 48 patients enrolled in the study. IVP group had higher overall rates of feeling of unreality on SERSDA scale: 92% versus 54% (difference 37.5%; p=0.008; 95% CI 9.3-59.5%). At 5min median severity of feeling of unreality was 3.0 for IVP versus 0.0 for SI (p=0.001). IVP also showed greater rates of sedation on RASS scale at 5min: median RASS -2.0 versus 0.0 (p=0.01). Decrease in mean pain scores from baseline to 15min was similar across groups: 5.2±3.53 (95% CI 3.7-6.7) for IVP; 5.75±3.48 (95% CI 4.3-7.2) for SI. There were no statistically significant differences with respect to changes in vital signs and need for rescue medication. CONCLUSION: Low-dose ketamine given as a short infusion is associated with significantly lower rates of feeling of unreality and sedation with no difference in analgesic efficacy in comparison to intravenous push.

02
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of pharmaceutical sciences (2016) PMID: 27373605 ↗
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two different landiolol formulations in a healthy Caucasian group.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. Key conclusion: In addition, after administration of both formulations, the landiolol-induced heart rate reduction showed fast onset and dose dependence, whilst the decrease of systolic blood pressure occurred more slowly, was less pronounced, and dose independent.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: To date, no data have been reported on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of landiolol, a fast-acting cardioselective β1-adrenergic antagonist, in non-Asian subjects. The aim of this study was to compare two landiolol formulations in healthy Caucasian subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized study in two cross-over periods with 12 healthy subjects (7 women and 5 men) each receiving three doses (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3mg/kg BW) of Onoact® 50 Lyophilized powder (50mg) or Rapibloc® concentrate IV (20mg/2mL) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of the two landiolol formulations. RESULTS: For both formulations, maximum blood concentrations of landiolol were rapidly reached (median tmax 2.3±0.65 and 2.8±1.13min for the high dose of each formulation). The compounds had a short half-life (t1/2=3.2±1.2min and 3.0±1.1min for the low dose of the concentrate formulation and the lyophilized powder, respectively). The results showed no statistically significant differences between both formulations of landiolol for any PK parameters, at study doses. Both formulations dose-dependently and significantly decreased the heart rate values from 62.2bpm at baseline to minimum values of 55-56, 52-53, and 50-52bpm after 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3mg/kg respectively. This bradycardic effect was achieved within 1 to 3min. The decrease in systolic blood pressure (baseline: 107mmHg, minimum values were around 99mmHg) was significant but not dose dependent, and occurred within 3 to 12min. Seven mild to moderate AEs occurred after administration of the concentrate formulation. No SAEs were reported in this study. CONCLUSION: In Caucasians, both landiolol formulations showed similar pharmacokinetic behaviours, displaying very short half-lives (3.0 to 3.6min). In addition, after administration of both formulations, the landiolol-induced heart rate reduction showed fast onset and dose dependence, whilst the decrease of systolic blood pressure occurred more slowly, was less pronounced, and dose independent. In summary, both landiolol formulations delivered comparable plasma

03
CLINICAL STUDY Vaccine (2016) PMID: 27206386 ↗
A Phase 1 clinical trial of a DNA vaccine for Venezuelan equine encephalitis delivered by intramuscular or intradermal electroporation.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Clinical Study published in Vaccine. Key conclusion: Clinicaltrials.gov registry number NCT01984983.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV), a mosquito-borne alphavirus, causes periodic epizootics in equines and is a recognized biological defense threat for humans. There are currently no FDA-licensed vaccines against VEEV. We developed a candidate DNA vaccine expressing the E3-E2-6K-E1 genes of VEEV (pWRG/VEE) and performed a Phase 1 clinical study to assess the vaccine's safety, reactogenicity, tolerability, and immunogenicity when administered by intramuscular (IM) or intradermal (ID) electroporation (EP) using the Ichor Medical Systems TriGrid™ Delivery System. Subjects in IM-EP groups received 0.5mg (N=8) or 2.0mg (N=9) of pWRG/VEE or a saline placebo (N=4) in a 1.0ml injection. Subjects in ID-EP groups received 0.08mg (N=8) or 0.3mg (N=8) of DNA or a saline placebo (N=4) in a 0.15ml injection. Subjects were monitored for a total period of 360 days. No vaccine- or device-related serious adverse events were reported. Based on the results of a subject questionnaire, the IM- and ID-EP procedures were both considered to be generally acceptable for prophylactic vaccine administration, with the acute tolerability of ID EP delivery judged to be greater than that of IM-EP delivery. All subjects (100%) in the high and low dose IM-EP groups developed detectable VEEV-neutralizing antibodies after two or three administrations of pWRG/VEE, respectively. VEEV-neutralizing antibody responses were detected in seven of eight subjects (87.5%) in the high dose and five of eight subjects (62.5%) in the low dose ID-EP groups after three vaccine administrations. There was a correlation between the DNA dose and the magnitude of the resulting VEEV-neutralizing antibody responses for both IM and ID EP delivery. These results indicate that pWRG/VEE delivered by either IM- or ID-EP is safe, tolerable, and immunogenic in humans at the evaluated dose levels. Clinicaltrials.gov registry number NCT01984983. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The American journal of emergency medicine (2015) PMID: 25624076 ↗
Low-dose ketamine vs morphine for acute pain in the ED: a randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2015 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The American journal of emergency medicine involving n = 20 participants. Key conclusion: However, LDK induced a significant analgesic effect within 5 minutes and provided a moderate reduction in pain for 2 hours.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To compare the maximum change in numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, in patients receiving low-dose ketamine (LDK) or morphine (MOR) for acute pain in the emergency department. METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved, randomized, prospective, double-blinded trial at a tertiary, level 1 trauma center. A convenience sample of patients aged 18 to 59 years with acute abdominal, flank, low back, or extremity pain were enrolled. Subjects were consented and randomized to intravenous LDK (0.3mg/kg) or intravenous MOR (0.1mg/kg). Our primary outcome was the maximum change in NRS scores. A sample size of 20 subjects per group was calculated based on an 80% power to detect a 2-point change in NRS scores between treatment groups with estimated SDs of 2 and an α of .05, using a repeated-measures linear model. RESULTS: Forty-five subjects were enrolled (MOR 21, LDK 24). Demographic variables and baseline NRS scores (7.1 vs 7.1) were similar. Ketamine was not superior to MOR in the maximum change of NRS pain scores, MOR=5 (confidence interval, 6.6-3.5) and LDK=4.9 (confidence interval, 5.8-4). The time to achieve maximum reduction in NRS pain scores was at 5 minutes for LDK and 100 minutes for MOR. Vital signs, adverse events, provider, and nurse satisfaction scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Low-dose ketamine did not produce a greater reduction in NRS pain scores compared with MOR for acute pain in the emergency department. However, LDK induced a significant analgesic effect within 5 minutes and provided a moderate reduction in pain for 2 hours.

05
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of cardiology (2014) PMID: 24485633 ↗
Efficacy and safety of high dose versus low dose furosemide with or without dopamine infusion: the Dopamine in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure II (DAD-HF II) trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2014 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International journal of cardiology involving n = 50 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.74. Key conclusion: low-dose furosemide infusion; the addition of low-dose dopamine infusion was not associated with any beneficial effects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: The role of low-dose dopamine infusion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains controversial. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high- versus low-dose furosemide with or without low-dose dopamine infusion in this patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: 161 ADHF patients (78 years; 46% female; ejection fraction 31%) were randomized to 8-hour continuous infusions of: a) high-dose furosemide (HDF, n=50, 20mg/h), b) low-dose furosemide and low-dose dopamine (LDFD, n=56, 5mg/h and 5 μg kg(-1)min(-1) respectively), or c) low-dose furosemide (LDF, n=55, furosemide 5mg/h). The main outcomes were 60-day and one-year all-cause mortality (ACM) and hospitalization for HF (HHF). Dyspnea relief (Borg index), worsening renal function (WRF, rise in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥ 0.3mg/dL), and length of stay (LOS) were also assessed. The urinary output at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24h was not significantly different in the three groups. Neither the ACM at day 60 (4.0%, 7.1%, and 7.2%; P=0.74) or at one year (38.1%, 33.9% and 32.7%, P=0.84) nor the HHF at day 60 (22.0%, 21.4%, and 14.5%, P=0.55) or one year (60.0%, 50.0%, and 47%, P=0.40) differed between HDF, LDFD, and LDF groups, respectively. No differences in the Borg index or LOS were noted. WRF was higher in the HDF than in LDFD and LDF groups at day 1 (24% vs. 11% vs. 7%, P<0.0001) but not at sCr peak (44% vs. 38% vs. 29%, P=0.27). No significant differences in adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: In ADHF patients, there were no significant differences in the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes between high- vs. low-dose furosemide infusion; the addition of low-dose dopamine infusion was not associated with any beneficial effects.

06
CLINICAL STUDY Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology (2013) PMID: 23851069 ↗
Use of low-dose clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data to establish an occupational exposure limit for dapagliflozin, a potent inhibitor of the renal sodium glucose co-transporter 2.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2013 Clinical Study published in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology. Key conclusion: In conclusion, low-dose clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data can allow the OEL to be adjusted to the highest safe level.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Classical risk assessment models for setting safe occupational exposure limits (OEL) have used multiple uncertainty factors (UF) applied to a point of departure (POD), e.g., a No Observed Effect Level (NOEL), which in some cases is the pharmacological effect. Dapagliflozin promotes glucosuria by inhibiting the renal sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 transporter. The initial OEL for dapagliflozin (0.002mg/m(3)) was calculated when low dose clinical data was not available to identify a NOEL resulting in the need to use excessive UFs. To reduce the UFs from the OEL, a clinical pharmacodynamic [glucosuria and urinary glucose dipstick (UGD)] and pharmacokinetic study was conducted with single oral doses of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 or 2.5mg administered to 36 healthy subjects. Dose-related dapagliflozin systemic exposures were observed at doses ⩾0.1mg and glucosuria was observed at doses ⩾0.3mg and corroborated by UGD. The NOEL was therefore 0.1mg for glucosuria. For setting the new OEL, no UFs were required. Dividing the POD by 10m(3) (the volume of air an adult inhales in a workday), the resulting OEL was 0.01mg/m(3). In conclusion, low-dose clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data can allow the OEL to be adjusted to the highest safe level.

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Clinical pediatrics (2010) PMID: 20522615 ↗
Clinical results from a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of pantoprazole in children aged 1 through 5 years with symptomatic histologic or erosive esophagitis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2010 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Clinical pediatrics involving n = 60 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: Adverse event incidences did not increase with dose.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

In an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole (0.3mg/kg [low dose (LD)], 0.6 mg/kg [medium dose (MD)], and 1.2 mg/kg [high dose (HD)]) for delayed-release oral suspension (granules) in patients 1 to 5 years with documented symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and endoscopic evidence of reflux-related erosive esophagitis (EE) or histologic esophagitis (HE) consistent with GERD. Patients with HE were randomly assigned to LD, MD, or HD, and patients with EE, to MD or HD. A daily eDiary captured 5 individual GERD symptoms. A total of 60 patients (56 HE, 4 EE) were randomized. Mean weekly GERD symptom score (WGSS, sum of weekly mean frequency scores for 5 individual GERD symptoms) for the modified intention-to-treat HE population at the final week was improved with LD ( P < .001), MD (P = .063), and HD (P < 0.001) (paired t-tests). Patients with EE were healed at week 8. Adverse event incidences did not increase with dose.

08
CLINICAL STUDY Maturitas (2005) PMID: 15653005 ↗
Effects of low-dose, continuous combined hormone replacement therapy on sleep in symptomatic postmenopausal women.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2005 Clinical Study published in Maturitas involving n = 20 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Low-dose estrogen associated with low-dose micronized progesterone may especially benefit women who complain of disturbed sleep.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Sleep disturbances in peri- and postmenopausal women may result from hormonal changes, vasomotor symptoms, and possibly psychological factors. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) seems to diminish the disruption of sleep in climacteric women. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a low dose of conjugated equine estrogens (CE) in combination with different progestins (LD-HRT) and evaluate differences between regimens on sleep in symptomatic postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women were recruited and assigned to calcium-vitamin (control group) or to LD-HRT with 0.3mg of CE associated with a daily administration at bedtime of a progestin (2.5 mg MPA, CE + MPA, n = 20), or 100 mg natural micronized progesterone (CE + P, n = 20). Subjective symptoms were evaluated by the Greene climacteric scale, and by a visuanalogic graduated scale (0-10) at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of study. Greene's scores for the control group were similar to those in LD-HRT group at baseline, and showed no significant modification at all subsequent measurements. Conversely, in LD-HRT group, a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the scores of all Greene's domains was evident versus corresponding baseline and control group values. Conversely, in LD-HRT group, a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the scores of all Greene's domains was evident with no difference in the scores of the two treated group. Both CE + MPA and CE + P significantly (P = 0.05) reduced the HF and sleep visuanalogic score in comparison to the control group. The score of sleep was significantly (P = 0.05) lower in the CE + P group in comparison to that measured in the CE + MPA group. No significant correlation between sleep and vasomotor score was found. In conclusion, low estrogen dose may have a value in the treatment of menopausal women in which sleep disturbances may be a symptom of estrogen deprivation. Low-dose estrogen associated with low-dose micronized progesterone may especially benefit women who complain of disturbed sleep.

09
CLINICAL STUDY The American journal of emergency medicine (2024) PMID: 39427499 ↗
High- versus low-dose ketamine for analgesia in older adults in the emergency department.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Clinical Study published in The American journal of emergency medicine; statistical significance reported at p = 0.013. Key conclusion: High-dose ketamine led to a greater reduction in pain scores, and there was no observed difference in adverse effects or the need for rescue analgesia.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ketamine is increasingly being utilized in the management of acute pain in the emergency department (ED), including for older adults, a population at increased risk of adverse effects from medications. We aimed to compare the safety and analgesic effects of high-dose (≥0.3mg/kg) to low-dose (<0.3mg/kg) intravenous (IV) ketamine among older ED patients. METHODS: Multi-center, retrospective cohort study of adults ≥60years who received IV ketamine for pain between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was pain improvement as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score within 60min after administration. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects (early discontinuation, nausea, rescue benzodiazepines and intubation) and the need for rescue analgesia. Linear regression was used to assess the association between the change in NRS pain scores and dose after adjusting for baseline pain, requiring an additional dose of ketamine, and receiving an opioid. RESULTS: A total of 130 older adults received ketamine as an analgesic (37 high-dose, 93 low-dose). Median age was 69.2years, 52 % were women, 40 % had a history of substance use disorder. Prior to ketamine, 76 % received alternate analgesics and 23 % antiemetics. Baseline mean pain score was lower in the high-dose group (6.7 vs. 8.3, difference -1.7 [95 % CI -2.6 to -0.7], p = 0.013). Change in NRS pain scores were similar between the high-dose and low-dose groups (-2.4 [95 % CI -3.6 to -1.3] vs -1.6 [95 % CI -2.2 to -0.9], p = 0.27). After adjustment for baseline pain score, the high-dose group had a larger reduction in pain scores (-1.3 [95 % CI -2.6 to -0.1], p = 0.042) and percent change of pain (-23.8 % [95 % CI -42.1 % to -5.4 %], p = 0.012). There was no significant difference in rates of rescue analgesia (35.1 % vs. 44.1 %, p = 0.35) or early discontinuation (29.7 % vs. 32.3 %, p = 0.78). Rates of adverse effects were similar. CONCLUSION: High-dose and low-dose ketamine reduced pain scores in older adults. High-dose ketamine led to a greater reduction in pain scores, and there was no observed difference in adverse effects or the need for rescue analgesia. One-third needed disco

10
CLINICAL STUDY Drug and alcohol dependence (2023) PMID: 37267743 ↗
Buprenorphine reduces somatic withdrawal in a mouse model of early-life morphine exposure.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Clinical Study published in Drug and alcohol dependence. Key conclusion: Lastly, neonatal morphine exposure elevated mRNA expression of KOR, and reduced mRNA expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the periaqueductal gray when measured on PND 14.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The rising prevalence of early-life opioid exposure has become a pressing public health issue in the U.S. Neonates exposed to opioids in utero are at risk of experiencing a constellation of postpartum withdrawal symptoms commonly referred to as neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Buprenorphine (BPN), a partial agonist at the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) and antagonist at the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR), is currently approved to treat opioid use disorder in adult populations. Recent research suggests that BPN may also be effective in reducing withdrawal symptoms in neonates who were exposed to opioids in utero. We sought to determine whether BPN attenuates somatic withdrawal in a mouse model of NOWS. Our findings indicate that the administration of morphine (10mg/kg, s.c.) from postnatal day (PND) 1-14 results in increased somatic symptoms upon naloxone-precipitated (1mg/kg, s.c.) withdrawal. Co-administration of BPN (0.3mg/kg, s.c.) from PND 12-14 attenuated symptoms in morphine-treated mice. On PND 15, 24h following naloxone-precipitated withdrawal, a subset of mice was examined for thermal sensitivity in the hot plate test. BPN treatment significantly increased response latency in morphine-exposed mice. Lastly, neonatal morphine exposure elevated mRNA expression of KOR, and reduced mRNA expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the periaqueductal gray when measured on PND 14. Altogether, this data provides support for the therapeutic effects of acute low-dose buprenorphine treatment in a mouse model of neonatal opioid exposure and withdrawal.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category