NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Potassium (Citrate)

MINERALS · Evidence Monograph

Potassium (Citrate) is an evidence-graded minerals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (3 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 11 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 41,104 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for electrolyte balance, neuromuscular signaling, and enzymatic cofactor activity.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 3 Meta · 3 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 11 RCTs (2 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 41,104
Reported Trial Dosages 20 mg · 1.0 g · 0.5 g
Trial Duration Range 12 months · 14 days · 28 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for electrolyte balance, neuromuscular signaling, and enzymatic cofactor activity (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (20 mg · 1.0 g · 0.5 g) over a structured 12 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Amino-Acid Chelate (Bisglycinate) or Organic Citrate Salt
Avoid low-bioavailability inorganic oxides or carbonates if you have a sensitive stomach; organic chelates minimize GI irritation and transporter competition.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Smooth gastrointestinal tolerance without bloating, cramps, or osmotic loose stools.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If loose stools or abdominal cramping occur, reduce the elemental dose by 50% or switch to a bisglycinate chelate.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 19:00
With Dinner or 4 Hours Apart from Thyroid/Antibiotic Rx
Divalent cations bind to levothyroxine and fluoroquinolone/tetracycline antibiotics in the GI tract; maintain a strict 4-hour separation window.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary minerals clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (16 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (11 RCTs · 2 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (3 meta-analyses · 3 reviews)
01

What Is Potassium (Citrate) & Why Does Form Matter?

Potassium (Citrate) is classified under MINERALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in electrolyte balance, neuromuscular signaling, and enzymatic cofactor activity.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (20 mg, 1.0 g, 0.5 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Potassium (Citrate) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (11 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Potassium (Citrate) acts on pathways governing electrolyte balance, neuromuscular signaling, and enzymatic cofactor activity. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Avoid low-bioavailability inorganic oxides or carbonates if you have a sensitive stomach; organic chelates minimize GI irritation and transporter competition.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Potassium (Citrate) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 3 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 11 randomized controlled trials (2 double-blind, n = 41,104 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:27915395 (2017) — "Effect of potassium citrate supplement on stone recurrence before or after lithotripsy: systematic review and meta-analysis." (The available evidence shows that citrate supplement effectively reduces the recurrence of nephrolithiasis in patients undergoing SWL.) • PMID:25572045 (2015) — "The effect of supplementation with alkaline potassium salts on bone metabolism: a meta-analysis." (The observed reduction in bone resorption indicates a potential benefit to bone health.) • PMID:41645038 (2026) — "Efficacy and Safety of Keverprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Regimen in Initial Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial." (CONCLUSIONS: Keverprazan 20 mg twice daily with high-dose amoxicillin demonstrates a noninferior efficacy to bismuth quadruple therapy for initial H.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Amino-Acid Chelate (Bisglycinate) or Organic Citrate Salt. Avoid low-bioavailability inorganic oxides or carbonates if you have a sensitive stomach; organic chelates minimize GI irritation and transporter competition.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 20 mg · 1.0 g · 0.5 g · 10 mg/day over 12 months · 14 days · 28 days · 24 months. Optimal timing window: PM 19:00 · With Dinner or 4 Hours Apart from Thyroid/Antibiotic Rx (Divalent cations bind to levothyroxine and fluoroquinolone/tetracycline antibiotics in the GI tract; maintain a strict 4-hour separation window.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Smooth gastrointestinal tolerance without bloating, cramps, or osmotic loose stools.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If loose stools or abdominal cramping occur, reduce the elemental dose by 50% or switch to a bisglycinate chelate.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MAJOR] ACE Inhibitor (lisinopril ): Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (DrugBank:DB00722). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 19:00 · With Dinner or 4 Hours Apart from Thyroid/Antibiotic Rx) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (20 mg · 1.0 g · 0.5 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking ACE Inhibitor (lisinopril ).
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 16 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Urolithiasis (2017) PMID: 27915395 ↗
Effect of potassium citrate supplement on stone recurrence before or after lithotripsy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Meta-Analysis published in Urolithiasis involving n = 374 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.224. Key conclusion: The available evidence shows that citrate supplement effectively reduces the recurrence of nephrolithiasis in patients undergoing SWL.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This meta-analysis summarizes the available evidence on the effectiveness of citrate supplement for preventing the recurrence of nephrolithiasis in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Electronic searches were conducted using Medline-PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, BVS (Scielo, Lilacs), and Google Scholar literature databases. The authors worked in pairs to select studies that met the following criteria: randomized controlled trials that were conducted in adults and assessed the effect of potassium citrate supplement before or after SWL therapy for urolithiasis. Our primary aim was to asses the stone-free rate among the groups included in the studies. Fixed effect was used in the meta-analysis with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Heterogeneity was analyzed by the I 2 value. A total of 2505 references were initially selected. Of those, four were subjected to meta-analysis contributing five samples. These four studies included 374 participants who were followed for a period of 12 months after SWL. Mean potassium citrate dosage was approximately 55 mEq/day (18 mmol). The results showed that citrate supplement significantly protected against the recurrence of nephrolithiasis during 1 year after SWL [RR; 95% CI 0.21 (0.13, 0.31)]. The heterogeneity was not significant across the analyzed studies (p = 0.224). The quality of the analyzed studies was generally low. The available evidence shows that citrate supplement effectively reduces the recurrence of nephrolithiasis in patients undergoing SWL. However, statistical analysis of a larger trial conducted with methodological rigor is warranted.

02
META-ANALYSIS Osteoporosis international (2015) PMID: 25572045 ↗
The effect of supplementation with alkaline potassium salts on bone metabolism: a meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2015 Meta-Analysis published in Osteoporosis international; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04. Key conclusion: The observed reduction in bone resorption indicates a potential benefit to bone health.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The role of acid-base metabolism in bone health is controversial. In this meta-analysis, potassium bicarbonate and potassium citrate lowered urinary calcium and acid excretion and reduced the excretion of the bone resorption marker NTX. These salts may thus be beneficial to bone health by conserving bone mineral. INTRODUCTION: The role of acid-base homeostasis as a determinant of bone health and the contribution of supplemental alkali in promoting skeletal integrity remain a subject of debate. The objective of this study was, therefore, to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the effects of supplemental potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3) and potassium citrate (KCitr) on urinary calcium and acid excretion, markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) and to compare their effects with that of potassium chloride (KCl). METHODS: A total of 14 studies of the effect of alkaline potassium salts on calcium metabolism and bone health, identified by a systematic literature search, were analysed with Review Manager (Version 5; The Cochrane Collaboration) using a random-effects model. Authors were contacted to provide missing data as required. Results are presented as the standardised (SMD) or unstandardized mean difference (MD) (95 % confidence intervals). RESULTS: Urinary calcium excretion was lowered by intervention with both KHCO3 (P = 0.04) and KCitr (P = 0.01), as was net acid excretion (NAE) (P = 0.002 for KHCO3 and P = 0.0008 for KCitr). Both salts significantly lowered the bone resorption marker NTX (P < 0.00001). There was no effect on bone formation markers or BMD. KHCO3 and KCitr lowered calcium excretion to a greater extent than did KCl. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirms that supplementation with alkaline potassium salts leads to significant reduction in renal calcium excretion and acid excretion, compatible with the concept of increased buffering of hydrogen ions by raised circulating bicarbonate. The observed reduction in bone resorption indicates a potential benefit to bone health.

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Helicobacter (2026) PMID: 41645038 ↗
Efficacy and Safety of Keverprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Regimen in Initial Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Helicobacter involving n = 394 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Keverprazan 20 mg twice daily with high-dose amoxicillin demonstrates a noninferior efficacy to bismuth quadruple therapy for initial H.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of keverprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (KA) in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has not yet been demonstrated. Here, we aimed to compare the eradication rate of the KA regimen with esomeprazole-based bismuth quadruple therapy (EBQT) containing amoxicillin and clarithromycin for H. pylori initial eradication in the Chinese population. METHODS: Patients aged between 18-75 years were randomly assigned into KA group or the EBQT group. The KA group patients received keverprazan 20 mg (b.i.d.) and amoxicillin 1.0 g (t.i.d.) for 14 days. The EBQT group patients took esomeprazole 20 mg (b.i.d.), amoxicillin 1.0 g (b.i.d.), clarithromycin 0.5 g (b.i.d.), and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg (b.i.d.) for 14 days. The primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate 28 days after therapy. Secondary outcomes included compliance and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 394 patients were enrolled in this study. Eradication rates in the KA group and the EBQT group were 87.88% and 84.18% in intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) (rate difference: 3.70%, 95% CI: -3.14% to 10.53%), 92.55% and 88.24% in modified ITT analysis (rate difference: 4.32%, 95% CI: -1.63% to 10.27%), and 93.99% and 90.56% in per-protocol analysis (PP) (rate difference: 3.43%, 95% CI: -2.05% to 8.92%), respectively. The eradication rates for the KA group were not inferior to those of the EBQT group in ITT, modified ITT, and PP analysis. The incidences of nausea and overall adverse effects in the KA group were significantly lower than those of the EBQT group. CONCLUSIONS: Keverprazan 20 mg twice daily with high-dose amoxicillin demonstrates a noninferior efficacy to bismuth quadruple therapy for initial H. pylori eradication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registration No: ChiCTR2400092511. © 2026 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) International journal of antimicrobial agents (2026) PMID: 41520709 ↗
Beneficial effects of a compound probiotic in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients aged over 40 years: An open-label randomised clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International journal of antimicrobial agents; statistical significance reported at p = 0.521. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: While TTP was inferior to BQT in eradication efficacy, it demonstrated better tolerability and protective effects against gut microbiota dysbiosis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) is a recommended first-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication., but its use is limited by side effects and restricted bismuth availability. Probiotic represents an investigational alternative strategy. This study compared the efficacy and safety of triple therapy plus probiotics (TTP)with BQT. METHODS: Patients with H. pylori infection were randomised to receive either TTP (probiotics, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and esomeprazole) or BQT (bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and esomeprazole) for 14 d. The primary endpoint was the eradication rate by 13C-urea breath test ≥28 d after treatment completion. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and adherence. RESULTS: The eradication rates for TTP vs. BQT were 76.4% (126/165) and 86.6% (142/164) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (difference, -10.2%; 95% CI: -18.5% to -1.9%; P = 0.521) and 84.0% (126/150) and 94.7% (142/150) in the protocol (PP) analysis (difference, -10.7%; 95% CI: -17.5% to -3.8%, P = 0.576). Among patients aged ≥40 y, eradication rates were comparable between TTP and BQT in both the ITT and PP analysis (91.9% vs. 84.9% and 97.1% vs. 93.8%, P = 0.015 and P = 0.019 for noninferiority, respectively). The incidence of adverse event was lower in the TTP group (17.8% vs. 28.7%; P = 0.029). Furthermore, TTP preserved gut microbiota stability, whereas BQT induced dysbiosis. CONCLUSION: While TTP was inferior to BQT in eradication efficacy, it demonstrated better tolerability and protective effects against gut microbiota dysbiosis. In patients aged ≥40 y, TTP achieved non-inferior eradication rates, suggesting this subgroup may warrant further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200058491.

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) PloS one (2025) PMID: 41348736 ↗
Lime-based supplement reduces calcium oxalate stone recurrence: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in PloS one involving n = 83 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: LPR, a lime-based supplement rich in citrate and flavonoids, significantly reduced the 2-year recurrence rate of calcium oxalate stones by appro
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Recurrent urolithiasis is a major clinical challenge, with more than 50% of patients experiencing recurrence within 5 years. While potassium citrate effectively reduces recurrence, poor adherence due to cost and gastrointestinal side effects limits its long-term use. Citrus-based interventions, such as lime juice, have shown potential in enhancing urinary citrate and alkalinity but require further validation. This study evaluated the efficacy of a lime-based phytochemical-rich regimen (LPR) in preventing stone recurrence and reducing urinary inflammation in post-operative urolithiasis patients. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel lime-based preparation called LPR in preventing kidney stone recurrence over 24 months. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, 173 patients with calcium oxalate urolithiasis who had undergone successful stone removal were enrolled from six hospitals in Thailand. Participants were randomized to receive either LPR or placebo for 24 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of stone recurrence confirmed by computerized topography (CT). Secondary outcomes included changes in urinary protein excretion and urinary interleukin-8 (IL-8) level, a pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in renal inflammation and stone formation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess recurrence risk. RESULTS: Of 173 enrolled participants, 151 completed the study. The recurrence rate at 2 years was significantly lower in the LPR group (14%) compared to placebo (45%) (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.13-0.44; log-rank p < 0.0001) favoring LPR. Among completers, LPR significantly reduced urinary IL-8 level (p = 0.017) and 24-hour urinary protein excretion (p = 0.032) compared to baseline and placebo. No serious adverse events were reported, and adherence was high in both groups. CONCLUSION: LPR, a lime-based supplement rich in citrate and flavonoids, significantly reduced the 2-year recurrence rate of calcium oxalate stones by appro

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation (2026) PMID: 41288308 ↗
Natriuretic response to an acute oral potassium load in healthy individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation; statistical significance reported at p = 0.005. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that in CKD, potassium-induced natriuresis does not occur and oral potassium loading is accompanied by an increased risk of hyperkalaemia.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The health benefits of dietary potassium have been linked to potassium-induced natriuresis. However, it is unknown whether potassium loading in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) induces natriuresis and to what degree it increases plasma potassium. We hypothesize that potassium-induced natriuresis remains intact and that potassium loading is safe in patients with CKD. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled crossover study, 18 healthy individuals and 9 patients with non-diabetic CKD stage G3b-G4 received an acute oral load of potassium chloride (KCl), potassium citrate (K-cit) (40 mmol each) or placebo, either with or without 6 weeks of lisinopril (10 mg/day) pretreatment. Differences in placebo-subtracted plasma potassium and natriuresis between groups during 4-h follow-up were analysed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: In healthy individuals, but not in patients with CKD, urinary sodium excretion increased 2 h after potassium supplementation, independent of lisinopril pretreatment. Compared with patients with CKD, mean urinary sodium excretion in healthy individuals was 13 mmol [95% confidence interval (CI) 4-22; P = .005] and 13 mmol (95% CI 4-22; P = .006) higher 2 h after KCl and K-cit, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate positively correlated with urinary sodium excretion 2 h after KCl and K-cit, both with and without lisinopril pretreatment. Plasma potassium after potassium supplementation was higher in patients with CKD than in healthy individuals independent of lisinopril pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that in CKD, potassium-induced natriuresis does not occur and oral potassium loading is accompanied by an increased risk of hyperkalaemia. © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site-for further information please contact [email protected].

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Urolithiasis (2025) PMID: 41251791 ↗
Effect of low-potential renal acid load diet intervention on urinary lithogenic parameters in recurrent calcium urolithiasis patients (A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial).
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Urolithiasis involving n = 14 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: While prolonged dietary compliance was associated with correcting urine acidification, the dietary intervention exerted only a limited impact on other major lithogenic factors.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

To compare the efficacy of low PRAL dietary intervention against potassium citrate (PCi) extended-release medication in modifying key urinary lithogenic parameters for oxalate calcium calculi formation over a four-week duration. We conducted a three-arm, parallel-group study with 46 participants randomized into a Diet group (n = 14), a Medicine group (n = 16), and a Control group (n = 16). Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected at baseline, two weeks, and four weeks. Nine primary urinary outcomes were analyzed: Citrate (Cit), Potassium (UK), pH, Oxalate (OX), Calcium (UCa), Sodium (UNa), Chloride (UCl), Urine Volume, and estimated Potential Renal Acid Load (PRAL). Longitudinal changes were assessed using Linear Mixed-Effects Models (LMMs). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across the three groups (p > 0.05 for most of indicators) except citrate. The LMM analysis revealed that the Medicine group showed statistically significant improvements compared to the Control group in urine potassium and PRAL at two weeks and continued to four weeks (p < 0.001). Urine laboratory tests changes in diet intervention were not significant over time, however, the Diet group showed slight modification of the urine protective factors, such as urine potassium and pH, to alkalinization. Diet intervention no significant changes were observed in urine stone formation potential lithogenic factors including calcium, sodium, chloride, or oxalate. The low-potential renal acid load (PRAL) diet, characterized by higher consumption of vegetables, fruits, and less animal-based proteins, produced gradual but modest improvements in urinary parameters linked to calcium oxalate stone prevention. While prolonged dietary compliance was associated with correcting urine acidification, the dietary intervention exerted only a limited impact on other major lithogenic factors. © 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Helicobacter (2025) PMID: 41211681 ↗
Different Doses of Ilaprazole for Dual Therapy Versus Bismuth-Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Three-Arm, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Helicobacter involving n = 480 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.004. Key conclusion: No significant differences were observed between these dual therapies, which are expected to become promising alternatives for the primary treatment of H.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Current Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens-standard triple, bismuth-containing quadruple, and non-bismuth quadruple therapies-still face issues such as adverse effects and poor compliance. High-dose dual therapy, with its simplicity, lower pill burden, and comparable efficacy, has recently gained attention. However, existing studies are largely single-center with small sample sizes and lack sufficient evidence-based support. This study aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole-based dual and quadruple therapies for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at five hospitals from January to November 2023. A total of 480 patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups for 14 days: Group A (ilaprazole 5 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, all administered twice daily), Group B (ilaprazole 5 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 1 g three times daily), and Group C (ilaprazole 10 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 1 g three times daily). The eradication rates, adverse events, and patient compliance were recorded. RESULTS: The eradication rates of H. pylori in Groups A, B, and C were 76.9%, 88.1%, and 88.7% (p = 0.004) by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively, and 78.3%, 90.4%, and 91.0% (p = 0.001) using modified intention-to-treat analysis, and 81.8%, 92.1%, 92.2% (p = 0.005) by per-protocol analysis. The adverse event rates were 28.0%, 10.2%, 10.8% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p < 0.001), while patient compliance rates were 91.1%, 98.1%, 98.7%, respectively (p = 0.001). Sex, smoking history, alcohol intake, and sharing tableware or cups did not affect the efficacy of the three treatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The standard- or high-dose dual therapy with ilaprazole demonstrated superior efficacy, safety, and patient compliance compared to quadruple therapy. No significant differences were observed between these dual therapies, which are expected to become promising alternatives for the primary treatment of H. pylori infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Helicobacter (2025) PMID: 41116602 ↗
Tailored Therapy Guided by Antibiotic Genotypic Resistances and CYP2C19 Polymorphisms Detected From Fecal Specimens for the First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Helicobacter. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The tailored TBT guided by antibiotic genotypic resistances and CYP2C19 polymorphisms detected from fecal specimens achieved satisfactory efficacy, safety, and compliance in the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication with less expenses (ChiCTR2300068620).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Tailored therapy based on genetic testing of fecal samples is a promising method for Helicobacter pylori eradication, but relevant research is still lacking, and the effectiveness remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and compliance of triple plus bismuth therapy (TBT) guided by clarithromycin and levofloxacin genotypic resistances and CYP2C19 polymorphisms from stool samples. A preliminary health economics analysis was also conducted. DESIGN: Six hundred and sixteen treatment-naïve patients were randomly divided into tailored (individualized drug selection based on genetic testing for 7 or 14 days) and empiric (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, all twice daily for 14 days) TBT groups. Safety and compliance were assessed within 1-3 days after eradication. 13C-urea breath test was performed within 4-8 weeks after eradication to evaluate the therapeutic outcome. RESULTS: The eradication rates of the tailored TBT group were non-inferior to those of the empiric TBT group [intention-to-treat analysis 87.7% vs. 80.8%, rate difference 6.8% (95% confidence interval 0.8%-12.9%); modified intention-to-treat analysis 93.4% vs. 86.8%, rate difference 6.7% (95% confidence interval 1.5%-11.9%); per-protocol analysis 95.7% vs. 88.7%, rate difference 7.0% (95% confidence interval 2.2%-11.8%)]. The tailored TBT group achieved satisfactory efficacies (acceptable in intention-to-treat and excellent in per-protocol analyses). Safety and compliance were similar between the two groups. The average cost of each successful eradication case in the tailored TBT group is lower than that in the empiric TBT group. CONCLUSION: The tailored TBT guided by antibiotic genotypic resistances and CYP2C19 polymorphisms detected from fecal specimens achieved satisfactory efficacy, safety, and compliance in the first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication with less expenses (ChiCTR2300068620). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registration: ChiCTR2300068620. © 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Lancet. Infectious diseases (2026) PMID: 40945526 ↗
Rifasutenizol-based triple therapy versus bismuth plus clarithromycin-based triple therapy for first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in China (EVEREST-HP): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, triple-dummy, double-blind, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Lancet. Infectious diseases involving n = 1,267 participants. Key conclusion: FINDINGS: Between May 18, 2023, and Nov 10, 2023, 1267 patients w
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Rifasutenizol (TNP-2198) is a new molecular entity with a synergistic dual mechanism of action under clinical development for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a rifasutenizol-based triple therapy (RTT) versus bismuth plus clarithromycin-based triple therapy (BCTT) for the treatment of H pylori infection in treatment-naive patients. METHODS: EVEREST-HP was a phase 3, randomised, triple-dummy, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial with adaptive design for sample size re-estimation conducted at 40 research hospitals in China. Treatment-naive patients aged 18-65 years, with a positive [13C]urea breath test ([13C]UBT), further confirmed by gastric biopsy and histological examination, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive RTT (rifasutenizol 400 mg oral capsules, amoxicillin 1 g oral capsules, and rabeprazole 20 mg enteric-coated tables) or BCTT (bismuth potassium citrate 240 mg oral tablets, clarithromycin 500 mg oral tablets, amoxicillin 1 g oral capsules, and rabeprazole 20 mg enteric-coated tablets), all twice a day for 14 days. Randomisation was done centrally by a secure interactive web response system using block sizes of two or four and stratified by study site. RTT was compared against BCTT using a triple-dummy approach to ensure masking. The primary endpoint was H pylori eradication rate based on [13C]UBT 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drugs. The eradication rates of RTT and BCTT were compared using a one-sided α value of 0·025 and a non-inferiority margin of -10%. Safety endpoints included investigator assessed treatment-emergent adverse events, the severity and relationship with study drugs, findings from physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiogram. An interim analysis was conducted by an independent data monitoring committee after 50% (350) of patients completed the last [13C]UBT. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05857163. FINDINGS: Between May 18, 2023, and Nov 10, 2023, 1267 patients w

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category