NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Resistant Starch

PROBIOTICS · Evidence Monograph

Resistant Starch is an evidence-graded probiotics monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 6,076 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 10 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (2 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 6,076
Reported Trial Dosages 28 g/day · 50 g · 0.08 g
Trial Duration Range 2 weeks · 3 months · 8 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (28 g/day · 50 g · 0.08 g) over a structured 2 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule
Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 07:30
Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water
Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
inflammation (PubMed clinical endpoint)
kidney (PubMed clinical endpoint)
diabetes (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Resistant Starch & Why Does Form Matter?

Resistant Starch is classified under PROBIOTICS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (28 g/day, 50 g, 0.08 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Resistant Starch frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Resistant Starch acts on pathways governing intestinal microbiome diversity, mucosal barrier integrity, and SCFA production. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Resistant Starch an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (2 double-blind, n = 6,076 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39444299 (2024) — "Effects of resistant starch supplementation on renal function and inflammatory markers in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (RS supplementation can reduce uremic toxin levels and improve renal function but does not reduce the inflammatory response in patients with CKD.) • PMID:36811560 (2023) — "Galactomannans are the most effective soluble dietary fibers in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: Galactomannans were the most effective dietary fiber for reducing the levels of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes.) • PMID:35899018 (2022) — "Effects of Resistant Starch on Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: The intake of RS reduced the serum IS, serum phosphorus, IL-6, and uric acid levels significantly in dialysis patients, while hs-CRP, serum creatinine, BUN, serum paracresol sulfate, and blood lipid showed no significant changes.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 39444299-0.37 (-0.57–-0.02)PMID 35188032-0.71 (-1.23–-0.19)-1.4Null (0)0.18Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Strain-Specified, Low-FODMAP Enteric or Spore Capsule. Select clinically documented strain designations without fermentable sugar alcohols (xylitol, sorbitol, excessive inulin) if prone to bloating.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 28 g/day · 50 g · 0.08 g · 100 g over 2 weeks · 3 months · 8 weeks · 3 weeks. Optimal timing window: AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water (Taking capsules with water when fasting gastric transit is rapid improves viable colony delivery to the lower intestine.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Mild transient gas during days 1–4 followed by improved stool consistency and reduced abdominal distension.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If cramping or bloating persists beyond 14 days, discontinue and evaluate for FODMAP excipient intolerance or SIBO.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Resistant Starch, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 07:30 · Morning on an Empty Stomach with Lukewarm Water) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (28 g/day · 50 g · 0.08 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 2 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Renal failure (2024) PMID: 39444299 ↗
Effects of resistant starch supplementation on renal function and inflammatory markers in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Renal failure involving n = 355 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03 (SMD -0.37). Key conclusion: RS supplementation can reduce uremic toxin levels and improve renal function but does not reduce the inflammatory response in patients with CKD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that consumption of resistant starch (RS) has beneficial effects on the gut microbiota and immune function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of RS on inflammation, uremic toxins, and renal function in patients with CKD through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-2020. We included randomized controlled trials comparing RS supplementation to placebo. The National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) databases, and two gray literature sources - Baidu and Research Gate, were used for search, up to 28 August 2024. There was no limitation on publication date, but only manuscripts published in English and Chinese were included. RESULTS: A total of 645 articles were retrieved. Ten articles met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 355 subjects were included. The analysis revealed that RS dietary intervention can significantly reduce indoxyl sulfate (IS) levels (SMD: -0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.70 to -0.04, p = .03) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.02, p = .03). There were no significant differences in the levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), p-cresyl sulfate (p-CS), albumin, phosphorus, or tumor necrosis factor-α. CONCLUSIONS: The RS diet has potential beneficial effects on uremic toxin levels and renal function indices in patients with CKD. RS supplementation can reduce uremic toxin levels and improve renal function but does not reduce the inflammatory response in patients with CKD. Nevertheless, results should be cautiously interpreted, because of the limited sample size and different treatment dosages. Further research is necessary to corroborate the beneficial effects of RS2 supplementation in this population.

02
META-ANALYSIS The American journal of clinical nutrition (2023) PMID: 36811560 ↗
Galactomannans are the most effective soluble dietary fibers in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in The American journal of clinical nutrition involving n = 2,685 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Galactomannans were the most effective dietary fiber for reducing the levels of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Soluble dietary fibers are known to reduce the levels of blood glucose and lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 diabetes). Although several different dietary fiber supplements are utilized, to our knowledge, no previous study has ranked their efficacy yet. OBJECTIVES: We performed this systematic review and network meta-analysis to rank the effects of different types of soluble dietary fibers. METHODS: We performed our last systematic search on November 20, 2022. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included adult patients with type 2 diabetes and compared the intake of soluble dietary fibers with that of another type of dietary fiber or no fiber. The outcomes were related to glycemic and lipid levels. The Bayesian method was used to perform a network meta-analysis and calculate the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve values to rank the interventions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was applied to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence. RESULTS: We identified 46 RCTs, including data from 2685 patients who received 16 types of dietary fibers as intervention. Galactomannans had the highest effect on reducing the levels of HbA1c (SUCRA: 92.33%) and fasting blood glucose (SUCRA: 85.92%). With regard to fasting insulin level, HOMA-IR, β-glucans (SUCRA: 73.45%), and psyllium (SUCRA: 96.67%) were the most effective interventions. Galactomannans were ranked first in reducing the levels of triglycerides (SUCRA: 82.77%) and LDL cholesterol (SUCRA: 86.56%). With regard to cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels, xylo-oligosaccharides (SUCRA: 84.59%) and gum arabic (SUCRA: 89.06%) were the most effective fibers. Most comparisons had a low or moderate certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Galactomannans were the most effective dietary fiber for reducing the levels of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study was registered at PROSPERO as ID CRD42021282984.

03
META-ANALYSIS Journal of diabetes research (2022) PMID: 35899018 ↗
Effects of Resistant Starch on Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of diabetes research involving n = 301 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0002. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The intake of RS reduced the serum IS, serum phosphorus, IL-6, and uric acid levels significantly in dialysis patients, while hs-CRP, serum creatinine, BUN, serum paracresol sulfate, and blood lipid showed no significant changes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a main health problem associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, morbidity, and mortality. Recent studies shown that the progression of CKD may be related to the change of intestinal flora. Resistant starch (RS) is a type of dietary fiber that can act as a substrate for microbial fermentation. Some studies have found that the supplementation of RS can improve the intestinal flora disorder in CKD patients. However, the specific effect of RS on CKD patients remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: We designed this meta-analysis to identify and assess the effects of RS on patients with CKD. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane systematic review databases was conducted in January 2020, and all new trials were updated in August 2021. Randomized trials were collected to assess the effects of RS on patients with CKD. The weighted average effect size of the net change was calculated by using the random-effects model. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 8 studies involving 301 participants. RS intake significantly reduced serum indolephenol sulfate (IS), blood phosphorus, IL-6, and uric acid levels in dialysis patients. The mean difference (MD) of serum IS (P = 0.0002) in the dialysis subgroup was -12.57 μmol/L (95% CI: -19.28, -5.86 μmol/L). The MD of blood phosphorus (P = 0.03) was -0.39 mg/dl (95% CI: -0.78, -0.01 mg/dl). The MD of serum uric acid (P = 0.004) between the dialysis subgroup and the nondialysis subgroup was -31.58 mmol/L (95% CI: -52.99, -10.17 mmol/L). The mean difference (MD) of IL-6 (P = 0.02) in the dialysis subgroup was -1.16 μmol/L (95% CI: -2.16, -0.16 μmol/L). However, there was no significant change of RS on hs-CRP, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), blood paracresol sulfate, and blood lipid. CONCLUSIONS: The intake of RS reduced the serum IS, serum phosphorus, IL-6, and uric acid levels significantly in dialysis patients, while hs-CRP, serum creatinine, BUN, serum paracresol sulfate, and blood lipid showed no significant changes.

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition and cancer (2022) PMID: 35188032 ↗
The Effects of Resistant Starch on Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition and cancer involving n = 739 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.007 (SMD -0.711). Key conclusion: Subgroup analysis shown that CRP level significant reduced in subjects from the east (SMD = -1.501; 95%CI: -2.662, -0.340; P = 0.011) or suffering from diseases (SMD: -1.057; 95%CI: -1.999, -0.115; P = 0.028).Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.o
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of resistant starch (RS) on inflammation and oxidative stress related indicators. PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane library were systematically searched to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RS intervention up to February 2020. We used from the effect size, as estimated by the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) to perform the random method meta-analysis, with P value ≦0.05 as statistically significant. The 16 included trials with 17 effect sizes included a total of 739 participants in this paper. The intervention duration was from 2 weeks to 3 months. The analysis indicated that RS decreases the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (SMD = -0.711; 95%CI: -1.227, -0.194; P = 0.007) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) (SMD = -0.609; 95%CI: -0.924, -0.294; P < 0.001), increases total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD = 2.543, 95% CI: 0.069: 5.017, P = 0.044). No significant effects on C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD = -0.583; 95%CI: -1.270, 0.104; P = 0.096), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (SMD = 0.091; 95%CI: -0.156, 0.338; P = 0.471), and malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD = -0.320; 95%CI: -0.907, 0.266; P = 0.285). Subgroup analysis shown that CRP level significant reduced in subjects from the east (SMD = -1.501; 95%CI: -2.662, -0.340; P = 0.011) or suffering from diseases (SMD: -1.057; 95%CI: -1.999, -0.115; P = 0.028).Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2021.2019284.

05
META-ANALYSIS Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition (2021) PMID: 34967190 ↗
Effects of resistant starch supplementation on oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition involving n = 706 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: RS supplementation may significantly reduce a few oxidative-stress and inflammation biomarkers such as malondialdehyde and C-reactive protein, particularly in T2DM patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Animal experiments showed that resistant starch (RS) had an antioxidant and antiinflammatory effect. However, clinical studies showed both insignificant and significant effects of RS on inflammation and oxidative stress. The purpose of this work is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate these effects. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A systematic literature search was conducted on Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane electronic databases, which included studies from the earliest date of the database to September 2021. Key inclusion criteria were: RCTs; reporting at least one inflammatory or oxidative stress biomarker as endpoint; more than seven day intervention. Key exclusion criteria were: using a mixture of RS and other functional food ingredients as intervention substance; inappropriate controls. RESULTS: A total of 16 RCTs including 706 subjects were included. RS supplementation significantly improved total antioxidant capacity [standard mean difference (SMD) (95% CI): 2.64 (0.34, 4.94), p=0.03], and significantly reduced blood malondialdehyde concentration [SMD (95% CI): -0.55 (- 0.94, -0.17), p=0.01]. RS supplementation significantly reduced blood C-reactive protein concentration in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients [SMD (95% CI): -0.35 (-0.65, -0.05), p=0.02]. RS consumption significantly reduced blood interlukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor- concentration if removing one distinct trial. CONCLUSIONS: RS supplementation may significantly reduce a few oxidative-stress and inflammation biomarkers such as malondialdehyde and C-reactive protein, particularly in T2DM patients. Future work should investigate the optimal dosage of RS supplementation for modulating oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers related to T2DM.

06
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2021) PMID: 33487300 ↗
The effect of acute consumption of resistant starch on appetite in healthy adults; a systematic review and meta-analysis of the controlled clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -4.513). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: To decrease the rate of appetite more effectively, we suggest other researchers to identify RS dose and type.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although several clinical trials have assessed the effect of Resistant Starch (RS) supplementation on appetite, the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of RS on the healthy adults' rating of appetite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To this end, Pubmed, CENTRAL, Web of science, Scopus, Medline, and Proquest were systematically searched to find the relevant randomized, and placebo-controlled human trials up to June 2019. As a result, the area under curve (AUC) and standard deviations of the participants' rating appetite were extracted from four eligible studies. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed a lower appetite in RS group compared to the controls (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.375 mm min, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -1.673, -1.076). Since high heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I2 = 94.5%, P < 0.001), subgroup analysis was carried out by RS dose, RS type, duration of supplementation, and time of AUC measuring. In studies that used RS dose of ≥25 gr, heterogeneity disappeared (P = 0.560, I2 = 0%). In such studies, a significant reduction was observed in rating of appetite (WMD = -4.513 mm min, 95%CI: -5.270, -3.755; P < 0.001) than studies with RS dose of <25 gr (WMD = -0.799 mm min, 95%CI: -1.123,-0.474; P < 0.001). Additionally, subgroup analysis based on the type of RS showed a significant decrease of appetite in studies that used RS2 (WMD = -4.808 mm min, 95%CI: -5.834, -3.782; P < 0.001) than RS1 (WMD = -0.128 mm min, 95%CI: -0.457, 0.202; P = 0.448). CONCLUSIONS: To decrease the rate of appetite more effectively, we suggest other researchers to identify RS dose and type.

07
META-ANALYSIS International journal of medical sciences (2021) PMID: 33437217 ↗
Benefits of resistant starch type 2 for patients with end-stage renal disease under maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of medical sciences involving n = 179 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.006 (MD -1.11). Key conclusion: Conclusions: Our results suggest that RS2 may improve the residual renal function of patients under MHD and mitigate a proinflammatory response.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Resistant starch type 2 (RS2) has been documented to regulate gut microbiota and to improve the clinical outcomes of several diseases. However, whether RS2 may benefit patients with end-stage renal disease under maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Adult patients receiving MHD were treated with RS2 (CRD42020160332). The primary outcomes were changes of uremic toxins, and the secondary outcomes were changes of inflammatory indicators, albumin and phosphorus. Results: After screening 65 records, five RCTs (n = 179) were included. A significant decrease of blood urea nitrogen (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -6.91, 95% CI: -11.87 to -1.95, I2 = 0%, P = 0.006), serum creatinine (WMD = -1.11, 95% CI: -2.18 to -0.05, I2 = 44%, P = 0.04) and interleukin (IL)-6 in blood (standard mean difference (SMD) = -1.08, 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.53, I2 = 35%, P = 0.0001) was revealed in the RS2 group. Analyses of blood levels of uric acid, p-cresyl sulfate, indoxyl sulfate, high sensitive C-reaction protein, albumin and phosphorus yielded no significant difference. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RS2 may improve the residual renal function of patients under MHD and mitigate a proinflammatory response. © The author(s).

08
META-ANALYSIS Marine drugs (2021) PMID: 33435383 ↗
Effectiveness of Chitosan as a Dietary Supplement in Lowering Cholesterol in Murine Models: A Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Marine drugs; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001. Key conclusion: Although there are some limitations in the results of this meta-analysis due to the limited number of animal experiments conducted, chitosan administration nevertheless shows promise in reducing the risk of cholesterol related metabolic disorder.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This study presents a meta-analysis of studies that investigate the effectiveness of chitosan administration on lifestyle-related disease in murine models. A total of 34 published studies were used to evaluate the effect of chitosan supplementation. The effect sizes for various items after chitosan administration were evaluated using the standardized mean difference. Using Cochran's Q test, the heterogeneity of effect sizes was assessed, after which a meta-ANOVA and -regression test was conducted to explain the heterogeneity of effect sizes using the mixed-effect model. Publication bias was performed using Egger's linear regression test. Among the items evaluated, blood triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol showed the highest heterogeneity, respectively. Other than blood HDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride in feces, most items evaluated showed a negative effect size with high significance in the fixed- and random-effect model (p < 0.0001). In the meta-ANOVA and -regression test, administering chitosan and resistant starch was revealed to be most effective in lowering body weight. In addition, chitosan supplementation proved to be an effective solution for serum TNF-α inhibition. In conclusion, chitosan has been shown to be somewhat useful in improving symptoms of lifestyle-related disease. Although there are some limitations in the results of this meta-analysis due to the limited number of animal experiments conducted, chitosan administration nevertheless shows promise in reducing the risk of cholesterol related metabolic disorder.

09
META-ANALYSIS BMC gastroenterology (2020) PMID: 33167889 ↗
The effects of resistant starches on inflammatory bowel disease in preclinical and clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in BMC gastroenterology involving n = 989 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Our review demonstrates that resistant starch is associated with reduced histology damage in animal studies, and improvements in clinical remission in IBD patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a debilitating chronic disease with limited treatment options. Resistant starches may represent a novel treatment for IBD. However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. Our objective was to perform a systematic review to summarize the preclinical and clinical effects of resistant starch, which may help guide future studies. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register were searched. Included studies investigated the use of resistant starch therapy in in vivo animal models of IBD or human patients with IBD. Articles were screened, and data extracted, independently and in duplicate. The primary outcomes were clinical remission (clinical) and bowel mucosal damage (preclinical). RESULTS: 21 preclinical (n = 989 animals) and seven clinical (n = 164 patients) studies met eligibility. Preclinically, resistant starch was associated with a significant reduction in bowel mucosal damage compared to placebo (standardized mean difference - 1.83, 95% CI - 2.45 to - 1.20). Clinically, five studies reported data on clinical remission but clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded pooling. In all five, a positive effect was seen in patients who consumed resistant starch supplemented diets. The majority of studies in both the preclinical and clinical settings were at a high or unclear risk of bias due to poor methodological reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Our review demonstrates that resistant starch is associated with reduced histology damage in animal studies, and improvements in clinical remission in IBD patients. These results need to be tempered by the risk of bias of included studies. Rigorously designed preclinical and clinical studies are warranted. Trial registration The review protocols were registered on PROSPERO (preclinical: CRD42019130896; clinical: CRD42019129513).

10
META-ANALYSIS The British journal of nutrition (2021) PMID: 32959735 ↗
Effects of resistant starch on glycaemic control: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in The British journal of nutrition. Key conclusion: The current study indicated moderate effects of resistant starch on improving glycaemic control.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The effects of resistant starch on glycaemic control are controversial. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis of results from nineteen randomised controlled trials (RCT) was performed to illustrate the effects of resistant starch on glycaemic control. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane electronic databases for related publications from inception to 6 April 2020. Key inclusion criteria were: RCT; resistant starch as intervention substances and reporting glucose- and insulin-related endpoints. Exclusion criteria were: using type I resistant starch or a mixture of resistant starch and other functional food ingredients as intervention; using substances other than digestible starch as controls. The effect of resistant starch on fasting plasma glucose was significant (effect size (ES) -0·09 (95 % CI -0·13, -0·04) mmol/l, P = 0·001) compared with digestible starch. Subgroup analyses revealed that the ES was larger when the dosage of resistant starch was more than 28 g/d (ES -0·16 (95 % CI -0·24, -0·08) mmol/l, P < 0·001) or the intervention period was more than 8 weeks (ES -0·12 (95 % CI -0·18, -0·06) mmol/l, P < 0·001). The effect on homoeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-insulin resistance (IR) was significant (ES -0·33 (95 % CI -0·51, -0·14), P = 0·001). However, the effects on other insulin-related endpoints were not significant, including fasting plasma insulin, four endpoints from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (insulin sensitivity index, acute insulin response, disposition index and glucose effectiveness) and HOMA-β. The current study indicated moderate effects of resistant starch on improving glycaemic control.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category