NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

Saffron (Mood)

STRESS MOOD · Evidence Monograph

Saffron (Mood) is an evidence-graded stress mood monograph evaluated across 25 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (6 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 409 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 25 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 6 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 9 RCTs (10 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 409
Reported Trial Dosages 30 mg/day · 28 mg · 300 mg
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 8 weeks · 3 weeks
Reading Time ~13 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 25 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (30 mg/day · 28 mg · 300 mg) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
inflammation (PubMed clinical endpoint)
anxiety (PubMed clinical endpoint)
liver (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Saffron (Mood) & Why Does Form Matter?

Saffron (Mood) is classified under STRESS MOOD and has been investigated across 25 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (30 mg/day, 28 mg, 300 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Saffron (Mood) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (9 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Saffron (Mood) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Saffron (Mood) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 25 PubMed studies: 6 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials (10 double-blind, n = 409 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39632602 (2025) — "Crocin Supplementation on Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (However, more studies are needed for definitive conclusions.) • PMID:35311615 (2022) — "Clinician guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric disorders with nutraceuticals and phytoceuticals: The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce." (RESULTS: Amongst nutraceuticals with Grade A evidence,) • PMID:33724127 (2022) — "Does saffron supplementation have favorable effects on liver function indicators? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (We found that saffron supplementation can reduce ALT serum concentrations without significant effects on other liver function indicators, including AST and ALP.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 33724127-2.39 (-4.57–-0.22)PMID 32525606-1.29 (-4.13–1.55)PMID 31987241-4.86 (-6.58–-3.14)PMID 40414301-2.92 (-5.13–-0.71)-7.8Null (0)2.8Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 30 mg/day · 28 mg · 300 mg · 15 mg over 12 weeks · 8 weeks · 3 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Saffron (Mood), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (30 mg/day · 28 mg · 300 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (25 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Phytotherapy research (2025) PMID: 39632602 ↗
Crocin Supplementation on Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Phytotherapy research; statistical significance reported at p = 0.008 (SMD -0.5). Key conclusion: However, more studies are needed for definitive conclusions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Saffron is the dried stigma of Crocus sativus L. flowers. The yellow-orange color of saffron comes from crocin, a water-soluble carotenoid that can be ingested. Crocin is known for its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant potential. It is believed to affect inflammation and oxidative stress, making it a promising therapeutic option. However, research on its impact is inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the benefits of crocin supplementation and its specific effects on inflammation and oxidative stress markers. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted up to February 2024 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to find suitable randomized clinical trials (RCTs). All participants were adults who were supplemented with crocin as part of the study intervention. The selected trials were subjected to heterogeneity tests using the I 2 statistic. Random effects models were examined based on the heterogeneity tests, and the pooled data were calculated as weighted mean differences (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Of the 519 papers that remain after duplications were removed, 13 eligible RCTs were included in the present meta-analysis. Our findings indicated that crocin supplementation significantly reduced c-reactive protein (CRP) levels (SMD: -0.50; 95%CI: -0.86 to -0.13; p = 0.008), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (SMD: -1.96; 95%CI: -2.72 to -1.19; p < 0.001), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (SMD: -3.52; 95%CI: -6.84 to -0.20; p = 0.03). Also, crocin supplementation led to a significant increase in total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD: 1.48; 95%CI: 0.52 to 2.43; p = 0.002). Overall effect size showed that crocin intake failed to change the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels significantly. Crocin reduces inflammatory markers and increases TAC. The effect of crocin on inflammatory markers was greater in a dose ≥ 30 mg/day and an intervention duration ≥ 12 weeks. However, more studies are needed for definitive conclusions. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

02
CLINICAL STUDY The world journal of biological psychiatry (2022) PMID: 35311615 ↗
Clinician guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric disorders with nutraceuticals and phytoceuticals: The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Taskforce.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in The world journal of biological psychiatry. Key conclusion: RESULTS: Amongst nutraceuticals with Grade A evidence,
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: The therapeutic use of nutrient-based 'nutraceuticals' and plant-based 'phytoceuticals' for the treatment of mental disorders is common; however, despite recent research progress, there have not been any updated global clinical guidelines since 2015. To address this, the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Disorders (CANMAT) convened an international taskforce involving 31 leading academics and clinicians from 15 countries, between 2019 and 2021. These guidelines are aimed at providing a definitive evidence-informed approach to assist clinicians in making decisions around the use of such agents for major psychiatric disorders. We also provide detail on safety and tolerability, and clinical advice regarding prescription (e.g. indications, dosage), in addition to consideration for use in specialised populations. METHODS: The methodology was based on the WFSBP guidelines development process. Evidence was assessed based on the WFSBP grading of evidence (and was modified to focus on Grade A level evidence - meta-analysis or two or more RCTs - due to the breadth of data available across all nutraceuticals and phytoceuticals across major psychiatric disorders). The taskforce assessed both the 'level of evidence' (LoE) (i.e. meta-analyses or RCTs) and the assessment of the direction of the evidence, to determine whether the intervention was 'Recommended' (+++), 'Provisionally Recommended' (++), 'Weakly Recommended' (+), 'Not Currently Recommended' (+/-), or 'Not Recommended' (-) for a particular condition. Due to the number of clinical trials now available in the field, we firstly examined the data from our two meta-reviews of meta-analyses (nutraceuticals conducted in 2019, and phytoceuticals in 2020). We then performed a search of additional relevant RCTs and reported on both these data as the primary drivers supporting our clinical recommendations. Lower levels of evidence, including isolated RCTs, open label studies, case studies, preclinical research, and interventions with only traditional or anecdotal use, were not assessed. RESULTS: Amongst nutraceuticals with Grade A evidence,

03
META-ANALYSIS Critical reviews in food science and nutrition (2022) PMID: 33724127 ↗
Does saffron supplementation have favorable effects on liver function indicators? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Critical reviews in food science and nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03 (MD -2.39). Key conclusion: We found that saffron supplementation can reduce ALT serum concentrations without significant effects on other liver function indicators, including AST and ALP.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Several pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical approaches have been suggested to improve liver health. There is a large discrepancy in the effects of saffron supplementation on liver function in adults. To fill this knowledge gap, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assess the effects of saffron supplementation on liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). A systematic search current to August 2020 was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using relevant keywords to detect eligible articles. A random-effects model was used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence (95% CI). Nine eligible trials were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis revealed that serum ALT concentrations were significantly reduced using saffron compared to placebo (WMD: -2.39 U/L; 95% CI: -4.57 to -0.22; P = 0.03, I2= 87.9%, P < 0.001). However, saffron supplementation did not affect levels of serum AST (WMD: 1.12 U/L; 95% CI: -1.42 to 3.65; P = 0.39) or ALP (WMD: 4.32 U/L; 95% CI: -6.91 to 15.54; P = 0.78). In the dose-response analysis, we did not find a significant dose-response relationship between dosage and duration of saffron supplementation on serum levels of ALT, AST, and ALP. We found that saffron supplementation can reduce ALT serum concentrations without significant effects on other liver function indicators, including AST and ALP. Nevertheless, future large RCTs on diverse populations are needed to understand better the effects of saffron and its constituents on these enzymes.

04
META-ANALYSIS Phytotherapy research (2021) PMID: 32525606 ↗
Effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Phytotherapy research; statistical significance reported at p = 0.16 (MD -1.29). Key conclusion: We also found a significant non-linear effect of saffron dosage on serum CRP concentrations (pnon-linearity = .03).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The effect of saffron supplementation on subclinical inflammation remains inconclusive. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize available findings on the effect of saffron supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) in adults. We searched PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases up to November 2019 using relevant keywords to identify eligible trials. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of oral saffron supplementation on plasma concentrations of CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6 were included. For each outcome, mean differences and SDs were pooled using a random-effects model. Overall, eight RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that saffron supplementation did not result in significant changes in serum CRP (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.43 mg/L; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.04 to 0.17; p = .16), serum TNF-α (WMD: -1.29 pg/mL; 95% CI: -4.13 to 1.55; p = .37), and IL-6 concentrations (WMD: 0.11 pg/mL; 95% CI: -0.79 to 1.00; p = .81). Subgroup analysis indicated a significant reduction in serum CRP levels in studies with baseline CRP of ≥3 mg/L, saffron dosage of ≤30 mg/day, and intervention duration of <12 weeks, as well as trials that used crocin. Similarly, saffron was found to decrease TNF-α in studies that recruited non-diabetic subjects, subjects with baseline levels of ≥15 pg/mL, and participants with <50 years old, as well as trials that administered saffron at the dosage of ≤30 mg/day. We also found a significant non-linear effect of saffron dosage on serum CRP concentrations (pnon-linearity = .03). The overall results indicated that saffron supplementation did not affect inflammatory cytokines. Further high-quality studies are needed to firmly establish the clinical efficacy of supplemental saffron on inflammatory biomarkers. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

05
META-ANALYSIS Complementary therapies in medicine (2020) PMID: 31987241 ↗
The effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) on mental health parameters and C-reactive protein: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Complementary therapies in medicine (MD -4.86). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that saffron intake significantly reduced BDI, BAI and PSQI scores, but did not affect HDRS-D, HARS-A scores and CRP levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The findings of trials investigating the effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) supplementation on depression, anxiety, and C-reactive protein (CRP) are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was carried out to assess the effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) administration on mental health parameters and CRP levels. METHODS: Two independent authors systematically searched online databases including EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception until 30th July 2019. Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was applied to assess the methodological quality of included trials. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using Cochrane's Q test and I-square (I2) statistic. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and weighted mean difference (WMD) was considered as the overall effect size. RESULTS: Twenty one trials were included in this meta-analysis. Consumption of saffron resulted in a significant reduction in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (11 studies with 12 effect size) (WMD: -4.86; 95 % CI: -6.58, -3.14), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (5 studies) (WMD: -5.29; 95 % CI: -8.27, -2.31) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores (3 studies with 4 effect size) (WMD: -2.22; 95 % CI: -2.73, -1.72). Saffron intake did not affect Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS-A) scores and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that saffron intake significantly reduced BDI, BAI and PSQI scores, but did not affect HDRS-D, HARS-A scores and CRP levels.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The American journal of clinical nutrition (2025) PMID: 41047129 ↗
Effect of saffron extract supplementation on mood in healthy adults with subclinical symptoms of depression: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The American journal of clinical nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04. Key conclusion: A potential effect on improved mental health outcomes cannot be excluded but requires further replication in future well-powered tr
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Subclinical depressive symptoms, including low mood, fatigue and anxiety, refer to clinically relevant depressive manifestations that do not meet the criteria for major depressive disorder. These symptoms affect quality of life and can lead to chronic mental health issues. Nutritional interventions, such as saffron extract supplementation, may help modulate mood and inflammation, potentially alleviating these symptoms. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of a 6-wk saffron extract supplementation on mood in healthy individuals with subclinical neuropsychiatric symptoms and explored the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involved 51 adult healthy individuals who received oral administration of either saffron extract or a placebo for 6 wk. The primary outcome was a composite z-score averaging standardized scores of depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-YA), and fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20). Secondary outcomes included neuropsychiatric scores, quality of life, inflammatory markers, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity. Amino acid derivatives were analyzed in blood samples. RESULTS: Saffron extract did not significantly affect the primary outcome of combined depressive, anxiety, and fatigue symptoms (z-score) nor individual symptoms. However, it improved autoperceived mental health, as reflected in increased mental health scores over time on the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 12 questionnaire, compared with placebo (mean at 6 wk: 53.8 ± 12.7 vs 44.6 ± 11.4 for placebo and saffron group, respectively; time × treatment, P = 0.04). There were no significant effects on inflammatory parameters or hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity. Metabolomic analysis revealed that saffron extract significantly modulated N-acetyl-phenylalanine. CONCLUSIONS: Saffron extract supplementation do not affect subclinical depressive symptoms, either as a composite score or individual symptom categories. A potential effect on improved mental health outcomes cannot be excluded but requires further replication in future well-powered tr

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Journal of nutrition (2025) PMID: 40414301 ↗
An Examination into the Effects of a Saffron Extract (Affron) on Mood and General Wellbeing in Adults Experiencing Low Mood: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Journal of nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01 (MD -2.92). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest conducted to date on saffron, provides evidence supporting the beneficial effects of 3 mo of saffron supplementation on depressive symptoms in adults.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Saffron, derived from the stigmas of the Crocus sativus flower, has been shown in previous trials to have antidepressant effects in clinically diagnosed adults. However, the recruitment of small sample sizes, short treatment periods, and variability in the quality of studies have negatively impacted the strength of conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this 2-arm, 12-wk, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to examine the effects of supplementation with a saffron extract (Affron) on mood and sleep in adults experiencing subclinical depressive symptoms. METHODS: Two hundred and two adults aged 18-70 with depressive symptoms were supplemented with 28 mg saffron daily or a placebo. Outcome measures included the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21, Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment Scale, World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Scale, and daily depression, stress, and anxiety ratings. RESULTS: On the primary outcome measure, compared to the placebo, saffron was associated with greater improvements in the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale - 21 depression score (β: -2.92 points; 95% confidence interval: -5.13, -0.71 points; Cohen's d = 0.39), with 72.3% of participants in the saffron group achieving a clinically significant change (a reduction of ≥ 7 points) compared to 54.3% of participants in the placebo group (P = 0.010). However, in the other secondary outcomes, there was no evidence of between-group differences. In exploratory analyses across various strata and assumptions, improvements in sleep disturbances (β: -2.72 points; 95% confidence interval: -4.99, -0.46 points; Cohen's d = 0.44) were identified in a subset of participants with a greater severity of sleep disturbance. There were no serious adverse reactions reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest conducted to date on saffron, provides evidence supporting the beneficial effects of 3 mo of saffron supplementation on depressive symptoms in adults. Large placebo responses were evident in this study, which require consideration in future trials. This trial was registered at Australian and New Zealand clinical trials registry as A

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2025) PMID: 40077679 ↗
The Effects of Combined Scutellaria and Saffron Supplementation on Mood Regulation in Participants with Mild-to-Moderate Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 180 participants. Key conclusion: Furthermore, a synergistic effect of the combination of these two extracts was identified, leading to enhanced improvements in depressive and anxious symptoms and emotional well-being among individuals with mild-to-moderate depression, compared to the placebo group.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background/Objectives: The global prevalence of mental health disorders, particularly anxiety and depression, has increased significantly, with rates further elevated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conventional pharmacological treatments, while effective, often lead to side effects that can impact patient adherence and quality of life. This has driven interest in safer, natural adjunctive therapies. Crocus sativus L. (Iridaceae) (saffron) and Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi (Lamiaceae) (scutellaria) have individually shown potential, in humans and animals, respectively, as mood regulators, with bioactive compounds that modulate neurotransmitter systems and possess anti-inflammatory and anxiolytic effects. This study aimed (1) to explore the efficacy and safety of scutellaria extracts in humans and (2) to test a possible synergistic effect when combining scutellaria and saffron on mood regulation in individuals experiencing mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 180 participants with mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms were assigned to receive either scutellaria extract alone (SCUTELL'UP®), saffron extract alone (SAFFR'ACTIV®), a combination of scutellaria and saffron extracts (SAFFR'UP®), or a placebo for six weeks. The primary outcome was assessed using a standardized depression scale (Beck Depression Inventory). The secondary outcomes, including anxiety, emotional state, well-being level, and sleep quality, were all assessed using validated questionnaires. Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout the study period. Results: The results confirmed the beneficial effects of saffron extract on depressive and anxious symptoms, as well as its role in improving sleep quality. For the first time in humans, scutellaria extract demonstrated a positive effect on mood regulation. Furthermore, a synergistic effect of the combination of these two extracts was identified, leading to enhanced improvements in depressive and anxious symptoms and emotional well-being among individuals with mild-to-moderate depression, compared to the placebo group. Minimal adverse effects were reported across all treatment group

09
CLINICAL STUDY BMC research notes (2024) PMID: 39227898 ↗
Crocus Sativus Linnaeus (Saffron) intake does not affect physiological and perceptual responses during a repeated sprint test in healthy active young males.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in BMC research notes involving n = 22 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Acute SAF ingestion did not significantly improve RSS performance nor physiological and perceptual measures in active young males.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The study aimed to investigate the effects of acute ingestion of saffron (SAF) on physiological (i.e., heart rate and blood lactate) and perceptual (i.e., ratings of perceived exertion [RPE] and feeling scale) measures in response to a repeated-sprint ability test (RSS) in healthy young males (N = 22; mean ± SD: age, 21.7 ± 1.24 yrs.). All participants completed two experimental trials with a one-week washout period using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. In each session, the participants were randomly chosen to receive either a capsule of saffron (300 mg) (SAF session) or a capsule of lactose (PLB session) two hours before performing the RSS.No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found for heart rate, RPE, and feeling scale between the SAF or PLB sessions at pre- and post-RSS. There were no significant changes (p > 0.05) in peak time, total time, fatigue index, and blood lactate in either the SAF or PLB sessions. Acute SAF ingestion did not significantly improve RSS performance nor physiological and perceptual measures in active young males. Future trials should address the topic by using shortened/prolonged higher doses of SAF on biological, physical, physiological, and perceptual responses to acute and chronic exercise. © 2024. The Author(s).

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Cancer investigation (2024) PMID: 38385429 ↗
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Concurrent Use of Crocin During Chemoradiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Cancer investigation. Key conclusion: Its pluripotent effects have led to a growing body of literature investigating its antitumor properties as well as its diverse potentials for mood stabilization, normal tissue protection, and inflammation reduction; However, there is a gap in clinical trials testing this substanc
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Crocin is the major active carotenoid of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Its pluripotent effects have led to a growing body of literature investigating its antitumor properties as well as its diverse potentials for mood stabilization, normal tissue protection, and inflammation reduction; However, there is a gap in clinical trials testing this substance in cancer patients. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to either 30 mg/day of crocin or placebo, prescribed during the neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. The primary endpoints were pathological response and toxicity, and secondary endpoints were depression and anxiety levels and survival analysis.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category