NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering)

SPORTS · Evidence Monograph

Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering) is an evidence-graded sports monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (8 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 3,824 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 8 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 8 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 3,824
Reported Trial Dosages 0.3 g · 1.0 g · 0.9036 g
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 16 weeks · 7 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (0.3 g · 1.0 g · 0.9036 g) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary sports clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (19 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (8 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (8 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering) & Why Does Form Matter?

Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering) is classified under SPORTS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (0.3 g, 1.0 g, 0.9036 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (8 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 8 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 3,824 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41416636 (2025) — "Negligible benefit of oral single-dose sodium bicarbonate on continuous running performance: systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials." (In meta-regression, male sex (p = 0.03) and higher body mass (p = 0.04) were associated with greater SB performance benefits) • PMID:39841595 (2025) — "Effects of sodium bicarbonate on 200 m time trial performance and physiological responses in swimmers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (These findings suggest NaHCO₃ enhances certain physiological responses but does not improve 200 m performance, though data limitations require cautious interpretation.) • PMID:35807770 (2022) — "Nutritional Ergogenic Aids in Combat Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (In this regard, abilities including the number of attacks, reaction time, handgrip strength, power and TTE, among others, were improved.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 398415951.09 (0.38–1.79)PMID 335467301.38 (0.97–1.79)-0.27Null (0)2.1Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 0.3 g · 1.0 g · 0.9036 g · 100 µg over 12 weeks · 16 weeks · 7 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Sodium Bicarbonate (Buffering), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (0.3 g · 1.0 g · 0.9036 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 19 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (2025) PMID: 41416636 ↗
Negligible benefit of oral single-dose sodium bicarbonate on continuous running performance: systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition involving n = 126 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.003 (OR 5.9). Key conclusion: In meta-regression, male sex (p = 0.03) and higher body mass (p = 0.04) were associated with greater SB performance benefits
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Sodium bicarbonate (SB) supplementation may enhance short-term, high-intensity exercise performance through improved extracellular buffering capacity, but its effect on continuous running performance has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials examining the effects of oral single-dose SB supplementation on continuous running performance. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for eligible trials published through 31 December 2024. The primary outcome was performance on a continuous running test. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and GI-associated study withdrawal rates. Running performance was analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis with adjustment for GI-related study withdrawals using intent-to-treat methods and publication bias using the trim-and-fill method. Treatment effects were reported using the standardized mean difference (SMD) statistic where 0.00-0.19 represents negligible benefit, 0.20-0.49 small benefit, 0.50-0.79 medium benefit, and ≥ 0.80 large benefit. We used univariable meta-regression to examine factors associated with treatment effect magnitude. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Among 11 studies with 126 participants, all used a cross-over design. Most (84%) subjects were male, SB dose was typically 0.3 g/kg, and performance test durations ranged from 1 to 30 minutes (median: 4 minutes). GI symptoms occurred more frequently with SB than placebo (29.5% vs. 2.6%; odds ratio = 5.9; p = 0.003; low certainty), as did GI-related study withdrawal (8.7% vs. 1.6%; odds ratio = 2.9; p = 0.049; moderate certainty). After adjusting for GI-related study withdrawal and publication bias, the treatment effect of SB was negligible and not statistically significant (SMD = 0.18; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.36; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). In meta-regression, male sex (p = 0.03) and higher body mass (p = 0.04) were associated with greater SB performance benefits

02
META-ANALYSIS Research in sports medicine (Print) (2025) PMID: 39841595 ↗
Effects of sodium bicarbonate on 200 m time trial performance and physiological responses in swimmers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Research in sports medicine (Print); statistical significance reported at p = 0.01 (SMD 1.09). Key conclusion: These findings suggest NaHCO₃ enhances certain physiological responses but does not improve 200 m performance, though data limitations require cautious interpretation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) supplementation on 200 m time trial performance and physiological responses in swimmers, following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search across five databases identified eligible randomized controlled trials comparing NaHCO₃ with placebo. Outcomes were 200 m time, blood bicarbonate, blood lactate, and blood pH. Results showed significant increases in blood bicarbonate (SMD = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.79, P<0.01), blood lactate (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.24 to 1.29, P<0.01) and blood pH (SMD = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.33 to 1.71, P<0.01), but no effect on 200 m time (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI -0.58 to 1.10). These findings suggest NaHCO₃ enhances certain physiological responses but does not improve 200 m performance, though data limitations require cautious interpretation.

03
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2022) PMID: 35807770 ↗
Nutritional Ergogenic Aids in Combat Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: In this regard, abilities including the number of attacks, reaction time, handgrip strength, power and TTE, among others, were improved.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Nutritional ergogenic aids (NEAs) are substances included within the group of sports supplements. Although they are widely consumed by athletes, evidence-based analysis is required to support training outcomes or competitive performance in specific disciplines. Combat sports have a predominant use of anaerobic metabolism as a source of energy, reaching peak exertion or sustained effort for very short periods of time. In this context, the use of certain NEAs could help athletes to improve their performance in those specific combat skills (i.e., the number of attacks, throws and hits; jump height; and grip strength, among others) as well as in general physical aspects (time to exhaustion [TTE], power, fatigue perception, heart rate, use of anaerobic metabolism, etc.). Medline/PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO were searched from their inception to May 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Out of 677 articles found, 55 met the predefined inclusion criteria. Among all the studied NEAs, caffeine (5-10 mg/kg) showed strong evidence for its use in combat sports to enhance the use of glycolytic pathways for energy production during high-intensity actions due to a greater production of and tolerance to blood lactate levels. In this regard, abilities including the number of attacks, reaction time, handgrip strength, power and TTE, among others, were improved. Buffering supplements such as sodium bicarbonate, sodium citrate and beta-alanine may have a promising role in high and intermittent exertion during combat, but more studies are needed in grappling combat sports to confirm their efficacy during sustained isometric exertion. Other NEAs, including creatine, beetroot juice or glycerol, need further investigation to strengthen the evidence for performance enhancement in combat sports. Caffeine is the only NEA that has shown strong evidence for performance enhancement in combat sports.

04
META-ANALYSIS Current nutrition reports (2022) PMID: 35394616 ↗
Can Sodium Bicarbonate Supplementation Improve Combat Sports Performance? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Current nutrition reports; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: In conclusion, NaHCO3 supplementation causes a significant increase in blood lactate, indicating an ergogenic effect on buffer, which can delay the onset of fatigue and contribute to the performance of combat sports athletes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To verify the effects of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) supplementation on biochemical and physical measurements of combat sports athletes. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic review of articles indexed in three databases (PubMed, CAPES journal, and Google Scholar) was carried out until October 2020, using descriptors related to NaHCO3 supplementation in combat sports. First, 38 articles were identified. Next, eight articles were selected through the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale (8 and 9 points). Blood lactate, rating of perceived exertion, Special Judo Fitness Test, Dummy throw, and mean and peak powers for Wingate were evaluated. Random effects meta-analysis was used, the effect size was adjusted by corrected Hedges' g, and the heterogeneity is explored by I2. The results were obtained through weighted average and 95% CI, and the significance limit was set as p < 0.05. NaHCO3 supplementation had a significant effect on increasing blood lactate (p = 0.006) of the athletes studied. However, the performance measures (rating of perceived exertion, power, and specific performance) did not show a significant difference (p ˂ 0.05). In conclusion, NaHCO3 supplementation causes a significant increase in blood lactate, indicating an ergogenic effect on buffer, which can delay the onset of fatigue and contribute to the performance of combat sports athletes. New experimental studies need to be published that assess the effect of acute and chronic NaHCO3 supplementation in specific combat sports tests and in women. © 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

05
META-ANALYSIS Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) (2022) PMID: 34687438 ↗
Extracellular Buffering Supplements to Improve Exercise Capacity and Performance: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) involving n = 2,019 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Extracellular buffering supplements generate large increases in blood bicarbonate concentration leading to positive ove
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Extracellular buffering supplements [sodium bicarbonate (SB), sodium citrate (SC), sodium/calcium lactate (SL/CL)] are ergogenic supplements, although questions remain about factors which may modify their effect. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the main effect of extracellular buffering agents on exercise outcomes, and to investigate the influence of potential moderators on this effect using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach. METHODS: This study was designed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three databases were searched for articles that were screened according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis and meta-regression models were used to investigate pooled effects of supplementation and moderating effects of a range of factors on exercise and biomarker responses. RESULTS: 189 articles with 2019 participants were included, 158 involving SB supplementation, 30 with SC, and seven with CL/SL; four studies provided a combination of buffering supplements together. Supplementation led to a mean estimated increase in blood bicarbonate of + 5.2 mmol L-1 (95% credible interval (CrI) 4.7-5.7). The meta-analysis models identified a positive overall effect of supplementation on exercise capacity and performance compared to placebo [ES0.5 = 0.17 (95% CrI 0.12-0.21)] with potential moderating effects of exercise type and duration, training status and when the exercise test was performed following prior exercise. The greatest ergogenic effects were shown for exercise durations of 0.5-10 min [ES0.5 = 0.18 (0.13-0.24)] and > 10 min [ES0.5 = 0.22 (0.10-0.33)]. Evidence of greater effects on exercise were obtained when blood bicarbonate increases were medium (4-6 mmol L-1) and large (> 6 mmol L-1) compared with small (≤ 4 mmol L-1) [βSmall:Medium = 0.16 (95% CrI 0.02-0.32), βSmall:Large = 0.13 (95% CrI - 0.03 to 0.29)]. SB (192 outcomes) was more effective for performance compared to SC (39 outcomes) [βSC:SB = 0.10 (95% CrI - 0.02 to 0.22)]. CONCLUSIONS: Extracellular buffering supplements generate large increases in blood bicarbonate concentration leading to positive ove

06
META-ANALYSIS Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (2021) PMID: 33546730 ↗
Effect of sodium bicarbonate contribution on energy metabolism during exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (SMD 1.38). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis has found that the anaerobic metabolism system (AnMS), especially the glycolytic but not the oxidative system during exercise is affected by ingestion of NaHCO3.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The effects of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) on anaerobic and aerobic capacity are commonly acknowledged as unclear due to the contrasting evidence thus, the present study analyzes the contribution of NaHCO3 to energy metabolism during exercise. METHODS: Following a search through five databases, 17 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random-effects model to determine the effects of NaHCO3 supplementation on energy metabolism. Subgroup meta-analyses were conducted for the anaerobic-based exercise (assessed by changes in pH, bicarbonate ion [HCO3-], base excess [BE] and blood lactate [BLa]) vs. aerobic-based exercise (assessed by changes in oxygen uptake [VO2], carbon dioxide production [VCO2], partial pressure of oxygen [PO2] and partial pressure of carbon dioxide [PCO2]). RESULTS: The meta-analysis indicated that NaHCO3 ingestion improves pH (SMD = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.79, P < 0.001; I2 = 69%), HCO3- (SMD = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.17, P < 0.001; I2 = 80%), BE (SMD = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.19, P < 0.001, I2 = 77%), BLa (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.11, P < 0.001, I2 = 68%) and PCO2 (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.90, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%) but there were no differences between VO2, VCO2 and PO2 compared with the placebo condition. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis has found that the anaerobic metabolism system (AnMS), especially the glycolytic but not the oxidative system during exercise is affected by ingestion of NaHCO3. The ideal way is to ingest it is in a gelatin capsule in the acute mode and to use a dose of 0.3 g•kg- 1 body mass of NaHCO3 90 min before the exercise in which energy is supplied by the glycolytic system.

07
META-ANALYSIS European journal of sport science (2022) PMID: 33487131 ↗
Sodium bicarbonate supplementation and the female athlete: A brief commentary with small scale systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of sport science. Key conclusion: Results indicated a pooled blood bicarbonate increase of 7.4 [95%CrI: 4.2-10.4 mmol·L-1] following supplementation and a pooled standardised exercise effect size of 0.37 [95%CrI: -0.06-0.92].
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

ABSTRACTSodium bicarbonate (SB) is considered an effective ergogenic supplement for improving high-intensity exercise capacity and performance, although recent data suggests that women may be less amenable to its ergogenic effects than men. Currently, an apparent paucity of data on women means no consensus exists on whether women benefit from SB supplementation. The aim of the current study was to quantify the proportion of the published literature on SB supplementation that includes women, and to synthesise the evidence regarding its effects on blood bicarbonate and exercise performance in women by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic searches of the literature were undertaken using three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus) to identify relevant articles. All meta-analyses were performed within a Bayesian framework. A total of 149 SB articles were identified, 11 of which contained individual group data for women. Results indicated a pooled blood bicarbonate increase of 7.4 [95%CrI: 4.2-10.4 mmol·L-1] following supplementation and a pooled standardised exercise effect size of 0.37 [95%CrI: -0.06-0.92]. The SB literature is skewed, with only 20% (30 studies) of studies employing female participants, of which only 11 studies (7.4%) provided group analyses exclusively in women. Despite the small amount of available data, results are consistent in showing that SB supplementation in women leads to large changes in blood bicarbonate and that there is strong evidence for a positive ergogenic effect on exercise performance that is likely to be small to medium in magnitude.HighlightsThis study aimed to quantify the proportion of the published literature on sodium bicarbonate supplementation that includes women and to synthesise the evidence regarding its ergogenic effect on women, using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach.The sodium bicarbonate literature is skewed, with only 30 studies (20%) employing female participants, of which only 11 studies (7.4%) provided group analyses exclusively in women.Despite the small amount of available data, results are consistent in showing that sodium bicarbonate supplementation in women leads to

08
META-ANALYSIS Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology (2019) PMID: 31196951 ↗
Effects of Treatment of Metabolic Acidosis in CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology involving n = 1,394 participants (RR 0.32). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Low-to-moderate certainty evidence suggest that oral alkali supplementation or a reduction in dietary acid intake may slow the rate of kidney function decline and potentially reduce the risk of ESKD in patients with CKD and metabolic acidosis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Metabolic acidosis is associated with progression of CKD and has significant adverse effects on muscle and bone. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the benefits and risks of metabolic acidosis treatment with oral alkali supplementation or a reduction of dietary acid intake in those with CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for relevant trials in patients with stage 3-5 CKD and metabolic acidosis (<22 mEq/L) or low-normal serum bicarbonate (22-24 mEq/L). Data were pooled in a meta-analysis with results expressed as weighted mean difference for continuous outcomes and relative risk for categorical outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), using a random effects model. Study quality and strength of evidence were assessed using Cochrane risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. RESULTS: Fourteen clinical trials were included (n=1394 participants). Treatment of metabolic acidosis with oral alkali supplementation or a reduction of dietary acid intake increased serum bicarbonate levels (14 studies, 1378 patients, mean difference 3.33 mEq/L, 95% CI, 2.37 to 4.29) and resulted in a slower decline in eGFR (13 studies, 1329 patients, mean difference -3.28 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 95% CI, -4.42 to -2.14; moderate certainty) and a reduction in urinary albumin excretion (very-low certainty), along with a reduction in the risk of progression to ESKD (relative risk, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.56; low certainty). Oral alkali supplementation was associated with worsening hypertension or the requirement for increased antihypertensive therapy (very-low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Low-to-moderate certainty evidence suggest that oral alkali supplementation or a reduction in dietary acid intake may slow the rate of kidney function decline and potentially reduce the risk of ESKD in patients with CKD and metabolic acidosis.

09
CLINICAL STUDY PloS one (2026) PMID: 41637472 ↗
Combined glycerol and sodium bicarbonate elicits improvements in fluid retention and blood buffering capacity.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in PloS one; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Buffering capacity was significantly higher with SB and G + SB compared to G and CON.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Background: It is unclear whether hyperhydration induced via glycerol, sodium bicarbonate or a combination of the two is most effective. Aim: This study evaluated the effects of glycerol-, sodium bicarbonate-, and glycerol + sodium bicarbonate-induced hyperhydration on measures of fluid retention, blood buffering capacity, and gastrointestinal symptoms at rest, in comparison to a fluid-only control. METHODS: Eleven healthy participants (six male) completed four trials (randomised, crossover design). Treatments consisted of glycerol-(G) = 1.0 g·kg-1 body mass glycerol; sodium bicarbonate-(SB) = 0.3 g·kg-1 body mass sodium bicarbonate; and combined glycerol and sodium bicarbonate supplementation-(G + SB) = 1.0 g·kg-1 body mass glycerol + 0.3 g·kg-1 body mass sodium bicarbonate; and a fluid only control-(CON) = 25 mL·kg-1 body mass artificially sweetened water. At baseline and at 20 min intervals for 180 min, urine samples were collected and analysed for volume, colour, and specific gravity, and gastrointestinal symptoms and body mass were quantified. At 60 min intervals, capillary blood was analysed for pH, blood bicarbonate concentration and plasma volume change. RESULTS: Compared to CON, fluid retention was significantly higher with G + SB from 120-180 min, SB from 120-140 min, and G from 160-180 min (p < 0.05), and accumulated urine volume was significantly lower with G + SB from 100-180 min, SB from 120-180 min, and G from 140-180 min (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in fluid retention between G + SB, SB or G at any time point (p > 0.05). Compared to G and CON, blood pH and blood bicarbonate concentration was significantly higher with G + SB and SB from 60-180 min (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid retention improved in G, SB and G + SB compared to CON, although there were no additive effects with G + SB compared to SB or G. Buffering capacity was significantly higher with SB and G + SB compared to G and CON. Minimal GI symptoms were induced by G, SB, G + SB and CON. Copyright: © 2026 Patrick et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use,

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2025) PMID: 41228456 ↗
Effect of Oral and Topical Sodium Bicarbonate on Functional Recovery and Soccer-Specific Performance After Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.032. Key conclusion: Conclusions: SB did not accelerate recovery following EIMD but prescribing oral SB before subsequent exercise might rescue key performance indicators.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Objectives: This study assessed the influence of oral and topical sodium bicarbonate (SB) on recovery and soccer-specific performance after exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design, 24 soccer players were allocated to oral SB, topical SB (PR Lotion, Momentous), or placebo (PLA) (n = 8 per condition) and attended six laboratory sessions: (i) familiarization, (ii) baseline measures, and (iii) four experimental trials on consecutive days. Muscle damage was induced on day 1 using 40 × 15 m sprints, after which either 0.3 g·kg-1 body mass (BM) SB (SB-ORAL), 0.9036 g·kg-1 BM PR Lotion (SB-LOTION), or an equivalent PLA was given. Recovery outcomes were measured post-EIMD, 1 d, 2 d, and 3 d post (day 1-4). Soccer-specific performance was repeated 3 d post, with supplements administered again 2 h pre-exercise. Recovery measures included muscle soreness, vertical jump height, and maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Illinois agility test (IAT), 8 × 25 m repeated sprints, and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 2 (Yo-Yo IR2) were assessed as soccer-specific performance. Results: Neither SB-ORAL nor SB-LOTION accelerated indices of recovery but decline in soccer-specific performance from baseline to 3 d post was attenuated for SB-ORAL, with significant effects for IAT (p = 0.032, g = 1.69) and Yo-Yo IR2 (p = 0.026, g = 1.61) compared with PLA. Conclusions: SB did not accelerate recovery following EIMD but prescribing oral SB before subsequent exercise might rescue key performance indicators. These findings offer implications for practitioners working with soccer players during periods where full recovery is not achieved.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category