NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA)

ANTIOXIDANTS · Evidence Monograph

Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA) is an evidence-graded antioxidants monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 4,209 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 7 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 4,209
Reported Trial Dosages 600 mg/day · 1200 mg/day · 600 mg
Trial Duration Range 3 months · 8 weeks · 2 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (600 mg/day · 1200 mg/day · 600 mg) over a structured 3 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Stabilized Bioavailable Redox Formulation (e.g., Ubiquinol / R-ALA / Liposomal)
Acidic antioxidants (such as alpha-lipoic acid) irritate the esophagus when taken fasting; pair fat-soluble antioxidants with meals.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Sustained recovery and absence of post-dose heartburn.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If epigastric burning or hypoglycemic lightheadedness occurs, take strictly with food and review concurrent glucose-lowering drugs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After a Meal
Post-prandial dosing prevents esophageal reflux and enhances lymphatic uptake of lipophilic redox cofactors.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary antioxidants clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (21 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (7 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (9 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA) & Why Does Form Matter?

Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA) is classified under ANTIOXIDANTS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (600 mg/day, 1200 mg/day, 600 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (7 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA) acts on pathways governing mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Acidic antioxidants (such as alpha-lipoic acid) irritate the esophagus when taken fasting; pair fat-soluble antioxidants with meals.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Alpha-Lipoic Acid (ALA) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 4,209 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41619689 (2026) — "Effectiveness of alpha lipoic acid supplementation on biochemical, clinical, and inflammatory parameters in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that ALA, especially at 600 mg/day, is a safe and potentially effective adjunct therapy for symptom management in DPN, although its impact on nerve conduction and long-term glycemic control remains inconclusive.) • PMID:41077538 (2026) — "Effects of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: ALA supplementation may improve certain cardiometabolic risk factors by ameliorating anthropometric and glycemic parameters, as well as through its potential lipid-lowering effects.) • PMID:40327515 (2025) — "Efficacy of Alpha Lipoic Acid Supplementation in Sperm Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials." (Finally, ALA did not change ejaculation volume (MD 0.14; 95% CI -0.54 to 0.83; p=0.6), s)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 41077538-1.1 (-1.66–-0.54)PMID 40134249-0.47 (-40.07–18.05)PMID 39413860-5.48 (-4.65–-1.17)PMID 34605276-10.88 (-20.81–-0.74)PMID 33827267-0.69 (-1.13–-0.26)PMID 33199187-0.64 (-0.79–-0.16)PMID 32091656-2.29 (-2.98–1.6)-49Null (0)27Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Stabilized Bioavailable Redox Formulation (e.g., Ubiquinol / R-ALA / Liposomal). Acidic antioxidants (such as alpha-lipoic acid) irritate the esophagus when taken fasting; pair fat-soluble antioxidants with meals.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 600 mg/day · 1200 mg/day · 600 mg · 300 mg/day over 3 months · 8 weeks · 2 weeks · 12 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After a Meal (Post-prandial dosing prevents esophageal reflux and enhances lymphatic uptake of lipophilic redox cofactors.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Sustained recovery and absence of post-dose heartburn.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If epigastric burning or hypoglycemic lightheadedness occurs, take strictly with food and review concurrent glucose-lowering drugs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MODERATE] Sulfonylurea /: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:24640981). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After a Meal) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (600 mg/day · 1200 mg/day · 600 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 3 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Sulfonylurea /.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 21 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Diabetes & metabolic syndrome (2026) PMID: 41619689 ↗
Effectiveness of alpha lipoic acid supplementation on biochemical, clinical, and inflammatory parameters in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Diabetes & metabolic syndrome; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (SMD -1.04). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that ALA, especially at 600 mg/day, is a safe and potentially effective adjunct therapy for symptom management in DPN, although its impact on nerve conduction and long-term glycemic control remains inconclusive.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: In this article, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation on biochemical, clinical, inflammatory, and functional parameters in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy or diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). A total of 15 articles were included, of which 12 were analyzed for outcomes. DPN is a chronic complication of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) characterized by symptoms, such as pain, sensory disturbances, and reduced quality of life. Currently, there is no definitive cure. Management focuses on controlling blood glucose and alleviating symptoms through pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. The aim of this study is to analyze the evidence regarding the efficacy of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation in the management of DPN. RESULTS: A systematic search across multiple databases was conducted using keywords, such as "diabetes mellitus," "diabetes mellitus type I," "diabetes mellitus type II," "alpha-lipoic acid," and "ALA supplementation." A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the 23 outcomes analyzed, 19 showed significant differences in favor of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation at different doses versus a placebo or other treatments. Notable improvements were observed in Total Symptom Score (TSS) paresthesia (SMD = -1.04; 95 % CI = -1.24 to -0.84; p < 0.00001), TSS numbness (SMD = -0.23; 95 % CI = -0.44 to -0.01; p = 0.04), and the Hamburg Pain Adjective List (HPAL) (SMD = -1.00; 95 % CI = -1.15 to -0.85; p < 0.00001), among others. These improvements were particularly evident for symptoms, such as paresthesia, numbness, and burning sensations, especially at a dose of 600 mg/day. In contrast, four of the outcomes HbA1c, nitric oxide levels, sural sensory nerve action potential, and peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity showed no significant changes. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that ALA, especially at 600 mg/day, is a safe and potentially effective adjunct therapy for symptom management in DPN, although its impact on nerve conduction and long-term glycemic control remains inconclusive.

02
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases (2026) PMID: 41077538 ↗
Effects of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -1.1). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: ALA supplementation may improve certain cardiometabolic risk factors by ameliorating anthropometric and glycemic parameters, as well as through its potential lipid-lowering effects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: There is no definitive consensus regarding the impacts of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation on the risk factors of cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of ALA supplementation on CMS risk factors. DATA SYNTHESIS: A comprehensive search of several databases identified 63 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until May 2025. The meta-analysis revealed that supplementation with ALA substantially decreased homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (weighted mean difference (WMD): -0.74, 95 % confidence interval (CI): -1.17, -0.31; P = 0.001), waist circumference (WMD: -1.10 cm, 95 % CI: -1.66, -0.54; P < 0.001), body mass index (WMD: -0.27 kg/m2, 95 % CI: -0.44, -0.10; P = 0.002), fat mass (WMD: -1.42 kg, 95 % CI: -2.53, -0.31; P = 0.012), body weight (WMD: -0.64 kg, 95 % CI: -1.04, -0.24; P = 0.002), serum levels of fasting blood glucose (WMD: -5.28 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -7.21, -3.35; P < 0.001), total cholesterol (WMD: -3.91 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -7.35, -0.46; P = 0.026), hemoglobin A1C (WMD: -0.40 %, 95 % CI: -0.66, -0.14; P = 0.003), triglycerides (WMD: -2.90 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -5.21, -0.59; P = 0.014), and fasting insulin (WMD: -1.70 mU/mL, 95 % CI: -2.88, -0.53; P = 0.004) in the ALA group compared with the control group. However, no substantial effect of ALA was identified on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: ALA supplementation may improve certain cardiometabolic risk factors by ameliorating anthropometric and glycemic parameters, as well as through its potential lipid-lowering effects. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD420251038360.

03
META-ANALYSIS International braz j urol (2025) PMID: 40327515 ↗
Efficacy of Alpha Lipoic Acid Supplementation in Sperm Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in International braz j urol involving n = 250 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.003 (RR 2.28). Key conclusion: Finally, ALA did not change ejaculation volume (MD 0.14; 95% CI -0.54 to 0.83; p=0.6), s
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Male factors contribute to 30 to 50% of infertility in couples. Treatment options for male infertility are limited, so antioxidant supplementation for idiopathic male infertility is currently being studied. Alpha lipoic acid (ALA) has a high antioxidant capacity and the potential to penetrate tissues, cells, and organelles, including mitochondria, due to its water and lipid solubility properties. The recent inclusion of randomized trials in the literature has required a new systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of alpha lipoic acid in sperm parameter changes. PURPOSE: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the currently available randomized trials comparing the effects of ALA supplementation versus placebo on sperm function in infertile male patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to June 2024. A random-effects model was employed to compute mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and binary endpoints. Heterogeneity was evaluated through the prediction interval. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by systematically excluding one study at a time and recalculating the pooled effect. All statistical analysis was conducted using R software 4.4.1. The certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE approach. Results were reported following the PRISMA statement guidelines. This study was registered in PROSPERO. RESULTS: Five randomized trials comprising 250 patients with a mean age of 28 to 40 years were included in this analysis. Over a mean follow-up time of 3 months, ALA was associated with a reduced proportion of abnormal sperm morphology (MD -0.89; 95% CI -1.48 to -0.29; p=0.003), increased total motility (MD 13.49; 95% CI 3.52 to 23.46; p=0.008), and increased sperm progressive motility (MD 12.43; 95% CI 2.89 to 21.97; p=0.01). Additionally, ALA was associated with a higher pregnancy rate in two individual studies reporting the outcome, however, no significance was found in our pooled analysis (RR 2.28; 95% CI 0.66 to 7.85; p=0.1). Finally, ALA did not change ejaculation volume (MD 0.14; 95% CI -0.54 to 0.83; p=0.6), s

04
META-ANALYSIS BMJ open (2025) PMID: 40180416 ↗
Alpha-lipoic acid on intermediate disease markers in overweight or obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in BMJ open involving n = 704 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.36 (SMD 0.08). Key conclusion: The meta-analysis results revealed no significant associations were detected between ALA supplementation and changes in intermediate disease markers, including triglyceride (TG) (standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.08, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.09, p=0.36, I²=0.00%, τ²=0.00), total c
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations between alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) intake and intermediate disease markers in overweight or obese adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, APA PsycINFO, SocINDEX, CINAHL, SSRN, SocArXiv, PsyArXiv, medRxiv, and Google Scholar (from inception to October 2024). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This study included English-language randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on adults (body mass index ≥25 kg/m²) to assess the impact of ALA on intermediate disease markers. Studies lacking outcome data, duplicates or inaccessible full texts were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Paired reviewers independently extracted the data. We used frequentist meta-analysis to summarise the evidence, employing the DerSimonian and Laird estimator to account for heterogeneity across study designs, settings and measurement methods. Heterogeneity was assessed via the I² statistic with CIs and τ² values. The risk of bias was independently assessed by two reviewers according to the Cochrane Handbook, covering domains such as randomisation, blinding and data completeness. Publication bias was assessed using Begg's test, while funnel plots and Egger's test were applied to outcomes with 10 or more studies. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs from an initial screening of 431 studies, encompassing a total of 704 adults. The meta-analysis results revealed no significant associations were detected between ALA supplementation and changes in intermediate disease markers, including triglyceride (TG) (standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.08, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.09, p=0.36, I²=0.00%, τ²=0.00), total cholesterol (TC) (SMD: 0.08, 95% CI: -0.55 to 0.71, p=0.80, I²=87.50%, τ²=0.52), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (SMD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.11, p=0.52, I²=0.00%, τ²=0.00), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (SMD: -0.13, 95% CI: -0.40 to 0.15, p=0.37, I²=0.00%, τ²=0.00), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.60 to 0.15, p=0.23, I²=26.20%, τ²=0.05) and fasting blood glucose (FBS) (SMD: 0.13, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.41, p=0.39, I²=29.40%, τ²=0.04). Acco

05
META-ANALYSIS International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition (2024) PMID: 40134249 ↗
Alpha Lipoic Acid Supplementation and Iron Homeostasis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition involving n = 529 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.67 (MD -0.47). Key conclusion: Subgroup analysis revealed a significant increasing effect of ALA on hemoglobin in patients with hematological disorders and in studies with durations >8 weeks.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence indicates the regulating effects of alpha-lipoic acid on iron metabolism. However, findings from clinical trials are equivocal. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the quantitative effect of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation on iron metabolism parameters including serum iron, total iron binding capacity, hemoglobin, and ferritin. METHODOLOGY: Online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched, up to 29 May 2022, to obtain all relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 1901 publications were identified in the systematic search; of which, 10 studies with a total of 529 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of the studies showed no statistically significant effects of ALA on ferritin (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -11.01 ng/mL; 95% CI: -40.07, 18.05 ng/mL; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.670), serum iron (WMD = -0.47 μ/dL; 95% CI: -24.48, 23.54 μ/dL; I2 = 94.7%, p < 0.001), hemoglobin (WMD = 0.49 g/dL; 95% CI: -0.54, 1.52 g/dL; I2 = 95.7%, p < 0.001), and total iron binding capacity (TIBC) (WMD = 3.95 μ/dL; 95% CI: -21.3, 29.2 μ/dL; I2 = 53.1%, p = 0.094). In subgroup analysis, ALA significantly increased hemoglobin in patients with hematological disorders (WMD = 1.23 g/dL; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.45 g/dL; I2 = 96.6%, p < 0.001) and in studies with durations longer than 8 weeks (WMD = 1.03 g/dL; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.25 g/dL; I2 = 96.5%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: ALA supplementation had no statistically significant effect on iron-related parameters. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant increasing effect of ALA on hemoglobin in patients with hematological disorders and in studies with durations >8 weeks. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

06
META-ANALYSIS Journal of renal nutrition (2025) PMID: 39413860 ↗
Effects of Alpha-Lipoic Acid Supplementation on Weight Loss, Inflammatory, Lipid, and Hematological Levels in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of renal nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.09 (MD -5.48). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: These findings revealed that ALA supplementation slightly but significantly reduced blood levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, total cholestrol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but did not affect IL-6, malondialdehyde, high-density lipoprotein chol
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: The effects of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation on cardiovascular-related factors have been evaluated in a number of randomized clinical trials, with different results. Thus, in this meta-analysis, the effects of ALA on blood levels of inflammatory, lipid, and hematological markers as well as anthropometric indices in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were evaluated. METHODS: Five electronic databases were used to conduct a comprehensive search through October 2023. Risk of bias assessment and data extraction were carried out separately by 2 reviewers on the included papers. The data were analyzed using the random-effects model in meta-analyses. The data were analyzed using the random-effects model in meta-analyses. We assessed inter-study heterogeneity with I2 and Cochran's Q test. RESULTS: Nine of the 421 potential reports were included. Using random-effects models, no significant changes were observed in weight loss, body mass index, hemoglobin, and iron following ALA supplementation (600 mg/day). Results exhibited that ALA significantly reduced high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in individuals with CKD (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -2.91 mg/L, 95% CI: -4.65, -1.17, I2 = 50.5%, P = .09); however, there were no significant variations in levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) or malondialdehyde. Regarding lipid profiles, findings revealed that ALA administration had no significant impact on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides levels among patients with CKD. However, compared to the control group, total cholestrol levels were considerably lower in CKD patients (WMD = -5.48 mg/dL, 95% CI: -10.55, -0.41, I2 = 0.0%, P = .50). Moreover, the sensitivity analyses showed that pooled WMDs for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly changed (-6.88 mg/dL, 95% CI, -12.78, -0.98). CONCLUSIONS: These findings revealed that ALA supplementation slightly but significantly reduced blood levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, total cholestrol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but did not affect IL-6, malondialdehyde, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, weight, body mass index, iron, and hem

07
CLINICAL STUDY International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition (2023) PMID: 34605276 ↗
Alpha-lipoic acid supplementation affects serum lipids in a dose and duration-dependent manner in different health status.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition involving n = 548 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.002 (MD -10.88). Key conclusion: Conclusion: The present meta-analysis revealed the beneficial effects of ALA supplementation on TC, LDL and TG levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Many studies have investigated the effect of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation on lipid profile, and different results have been obtained from these studies. The current systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis was conducted to achive a strong conclusion about the effect of ALA supplementation on lipid profile including total cholesterol (TC), low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL, HDL) and triglycerides (TG). Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, ProQuest and Embase for randomized placebo-controlled human trials that examined the effect of ALA supplementation on lipid profile up to November 2020. The dose and duration of ALA supplementation for included studies were ranged between 300-1200 mg/d and 2-16 weeks respectively. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effect size. Cochran's Q and I2 tests were also used to assess between-study's heterogeneity. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. Dose-response relationship was done using fractional polynomial modeling. Results: Among all eligible studies, 12 studies with a total number of 548 participants were selected. ALA caused a significant reduction on TC (WMD): -10.78 mg/dl, 95% CI: -20.81, -0.74, P=0.002), LDL (WMD: -10.88 mg/dl, 95% CI: -19.52, -2.24, P=0.014) and TG (WMD: -31.02 mg/dl, 95% CI: -49.63, -12.42, P<0.001). There was also a non-significant increaes in HDL concentrations. In addition, dose-response analysis showed a positive association between LDL (Pnon-linearity=0.026), TG (Pnon-linearity<0.001) and duration of intervention in a non-linear model. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis revealed the beneficial effects of ALA supplementation on TC, LDL and TG levels. Moreover, the beneficial effects of ALA supplementation on LDL and TG levels was duration-dependent.

08
META-ANALYSIS International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition (2023) PMID: 33827267 ↗
An updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials on the effects of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition involving n = 947 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.002 (MD -0.69). Key conclusion: In summary, ALA supplementation improves inflammatory markers without any evidence of non-linear association to dose or duration of the trial.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Data about the effects of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation on inflammatory markers are inconsistent. This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to summarize the effects of ALA supplementation on inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in adults. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase, and SCOPUS from inception to February 2020. Among all of the eligible studies, 20 articles were selected. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the pooled effect size. Between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2. Subgroup analysis was done to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity. The dose-response relationship was evaluated using fractional polynomial modeling. Twenty eligible studies with a total sample size of 947 participants were included in the current meta-analysis. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that ALA supplementation significantly reduced CRP (WMD: -0.69 mg/L, 95% CI: -1.13, -0.26, P=0.002), IL-6 (WMD: -1.83 pg/ml, 95% CI: -2.90, -0.76, P=0.001), and TNF-α concentrations (WMD: -0.45 pg/ml, 95% CI: -0.85, -0.04, P=0.032). No evidence of departure from linearity was observed between dose and duration of the ALA supplementation on serum CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α concentration. In subgroup analysis, ALA dosage, baseline concentrations of the parameter, sample size, and gender were considered as possible sources of heterogeneity. In summary, ALA supplementation improves inflammatory markers without any evidence of non-linear association to dose or duration of the trial.

09
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) (2021) PMID: 33199187 ↗
An updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of the effects of α-lipoic acid supplementation on glycemic markers in adults.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) involving n = 1,016 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04 (MD -0.64). Key conclusion: In summary, ALA supplementation improves serum insulin and insulin resistance in a two-class and duration dependent non-linear analysis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis was conducted to summarize data from available clinical trials on the effects of α-lipoic acid (ALA) supplementation on glycemic markers including glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), HOMA-β, and quantitative insulin check index in adults. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Embase and SCOPUS from inception to February 2020. Among all of the eligible studies, 28 articles were selected. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the pooled effect size. Between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2. Subgroup analysis was done to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity. The dose-response relationship was evaluated using fractional polynomial modeling. Twenty eight eligible studies with a total sample size of 1,016 participants were included in the current meta-analysis. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that ALA supplementation significantly reduced insulin (WMD: -0.64; CI: -1.287 to 0.004, P = .04), HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.48; 95% CI: -0.79 to -0.16; P = .002). No change in glucose or HbA1C was reported. Moreover, the effect of ALA on insulin was duration-dependent (Pnon-linearity = 0.04). No evidence of departure from linearity was observed between dose and duration of the ALA supplementation on other markers. The subgrouping revealed that ALA dosage and duration of ALA supplementation, health status of participants, geographic locations and the studies' quality are possible sources of heterogeneity. In summary, ALA supplementation improves serum insulin and insulin resistance in a two-class and duration dependent non-linear analysis.

10
META-ANALYSIS International journal of clinical practice (2020) PMID: 32091656 ↗
Alpha-lipoic acid supplementation significantly reduces the risk of obesity in an updated systematic review and dose response meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of clinical practice; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01 (MD -2.29). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: According to our finding, ALA treatment significantly reduced BMI, weight in a two-class meta-analysis without evidence of departure from linearity in terms of dose or duration.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: There are numerous trials reported the effect of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) on obesity measurements; while no summarised dose-response meta-analysis is available to address the effects of dose and duration of ALA supplementation on obesity measurements. We aimed to summarise the results of studies evaluating the effects of ALA supplementation on obesity measurements in a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a systematic search from Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Proquest electronic databases up to January 2020 relevant studies were retrieved. Randomised, placebo-controlled trials investigating the effect of ALA supplementation on obesity measurements including weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR) and fat mass (FM) were included. Two class and dose-response meta-analysis were performed to data analysis. RESULTS: Totally, 18, 21 and 8 studies were included for the meta-analysis of ALA-weight, ALA-BMI, ALA-WC, respectively. In the two-class meta-analysis, ALA treatment significantly reduced weight (WMD: -2.29 kg, 95% CI: -2.98, 1.60, P < .01) and BMI (WMD: -0.49 kg/m2 , 95% CI:-0.83,-0.15, P = .005) but no effect on WC (WMD: -2.57 cm, 95% CI: -8.91, 3.76; P = .426). While the dose-response meta-analysis revealed that the duration of ALA treatment is a significant factor affecting WC reduction (Pnon-linearity = .047). While no evidence of departure from linearity was observed for other variables; moreover, subgrouping also revealed that gender could be an important factor affecting the ALA impact on WC which was significant among women (WMD: -4.099; CI: -7.837, -0.361; P = .032). CONCLUSION: According to our finding, ALA treatment significantly reduced BMI, weight in a two-class meta-analysis without evidence of departure from linearity in terms of dose or duration. While the association of ALA treatment on WC is dependent to the duration of the study. Although further trials evaluating the other obesity measurements specially central obesity will be helpful to infer a more reliable result. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category