NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lutein

ANTIOXIDANTS · Evidence Monograph

Lutein is an evidence-graded antioxidants monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 97,441 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 9 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 97,441
Reported Trial Dosages 5 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g
Trial Duration Range 42 weeks · 32 weeks · 1 months
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (5 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g) over a structured 42 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Stabilized Bioavailable Redox Formulation (e.g., Ubiquinol / R-ALA / Liposomal)
Acidic antioxidants (such as alpha-lipoic acid) irritate the esophagus when taken fasting; pair fat-soluble antioxidants with meals.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Sustained recovery and absence of post-dose heartburn.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If epigastric burning or hypoglycemic lightheadedness occurs, take strictly with food and review concurrent glucose-lowering drugs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After a Meal
Post-prandial dosing prevents esophageal reflux and enhances lymphatic uptake of lipophilic redox cofactors.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
cancer (PubMed clinical endpoint)
antioxidant (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Lutein & Why Does Form Matter?

Lutein is classified under ANTIOXIDANTS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (5 mg/day, 20 mg/day, 2,500 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lutein frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (9 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lutein acts on pathways governing mitochondrial redox homeostasis, free-radical scavenging, and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Acidic antioxidants (such as alpha-lipoic acid) irritate the esophagus when taken fasting; pair fat-soluble antioxidants with meals.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lutein an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 97,441 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40522203 (2025) — "Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis." (However, it is not known whether these treatments offer significant long-term advantages over observation or each other.) • PMID:40292760 (2025) — "Lutein and zeaxanthin for reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants." (OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.) • PMID:38582248 (2024) — "Effect of Antioxidant Supplementation on Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." (Overall, antioxidant supplementation was estimated to improve eye health parameters, whereas different combinations of antioxidants may also have varying effects on improving visual health from multiple perspectives.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 370949470.08 (0.05–0.11)PMID 36336325-3.82 (-13.83–6.18)PMID 341570980.02 (-0.01–0.05)PMID 4134262410.08 (3.79–24.07)PMID 408765380.17 (0.05–0.21)-20Null (0)30Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Stabilized Bioavailable Redox Formulation (e.g., Ubiquinol / R-ALA / Liposomal). Acidic antioxidants (such as alpha-lipoic acid) irritate the esophagus when taken fasting; pair fat-soluble antioxidants with meals.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 5 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g · 3 g/day over 42 weeks · 32 weeks · 1 months · 6 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After a Meal (Post-prandial dosing prevents esophageal reflux and enhances lymphatic uptake of lipophilic redox cofactors.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Sustained recovery and absence of post-dose heartburn.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If epigastric burning or hypoglycemic lightheadedness occurs, take strictly with food and review concurrent glucose-lowering drugs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Lutein, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After a Meal) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (5 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 42 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 18 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2025) PMID: 40522203 ↗
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 1,098 participants. Key conclusion: However, it is not known whether these treatments offer significant long-term advantages over observation or each other.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by a thickened and dysfunctional choroid which is accompanied by a serous detachment of the neural retina. The effects on the retina are usually self-limiting, although some people are left with irreversible vision loss due to progressive and permanent photoreceptor damage or atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). There has been a variety of interventions used in CSC, including, but not limited to, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and drug therapy with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists or intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, it is not known whether these treatments offer significant long-term advantages over observation or each other. At present, there is no evidence-based consensus on the management of CSC. OBJECTIVES: This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2015 where 25 studies with 1098 participants were included. Since then, many trials have been conducted and reports published. Our primary objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness of multiple interventions for CSC. The secondary objective was to provide the relative ranking of the interventions for CSC using network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three trial registries in 29 March 2024, together with reference checking. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any intervention for CSC with any other intervention for CSC or control. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (CL, LP) independently selected studies and extracted data. Our outcomes of interest were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), recurrence of CSC, persistent CSC, contrast sensitivity, central retinal subfield thickness, quality of life, and adverse events. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used Cochrane's statistical software, Review Manager, to perform pairwise analyses and Stata to perform network meta-analysis (NMA). For pairwise comparisons, we pooled data from studies using fixed or random-effects models if there were fewer or more than three

02
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2025) PMID: 40292760 ↗
Lutein and zeaxanthin for reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 532 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.53 (RR 0.49). Key conclusion: OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Lutein and zeaxanthin are nutrients with antioxidant properties found in the macula of the eye and brain tissue. They have been reported to play a role in reducing oxidative damage, especially in the eyes and possibly in other organ systems. Oxygen free radicals are one of the agents postulated to cause tissue damage in preterm infants, which leads to morbidities such as retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). Supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin may reduce oxidative damage, hence reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. SEARCH METHODS: We conducted searches up to 17 December 2024 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registries. We also searched the reference lists of included studies, and related reviews and studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCT, cross-over trials, and quasi-RCTs that compared lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation against placebo or no supplementation for preterm infants less than 37 completed weeks' postmenstrual age. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were the incidence of any stage of ROP, incidence of ROP stage 3 and above, incidence of visual impairment, and mortality assessed throughout the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of IVH, incidence of NEC, and any reported adverse effects. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies (666 preterm infants) that compared lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation versus control (placebo or no supplementation). All five studies were conducted in high-income countries (Italy and the USA). We did not find any studies comparing lutein or zeaxanthin separately versus placebo or no supplementation. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias in most key domains, such as allocation concealment and blinding. The evidence suggests that lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation proba

03
META-ANALYSIS Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) (2024) PMID: 38582248 ↗
Effect of Antioxidant Supplementation on Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). Key conclusion: Overall, antioxidant supplementation was estimated to improve eye health parameters, whereas different combinations of antioxidants may also have varying effects on improving visual health from multiple perspectives.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Antioxidants are bioactive molecules that function to scavenge free radicals and balance oxidative stress. Although all antioxidants can act as reactive oxygen species scavengers, their efficacy on eye health may vary. Moreover, the comparative effectiveness and potential additive effect between groups of antioxidants, hitherto, have not been systematically studied. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the comparative or additive effect of dietary antioxidant supplements on eye health. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane) were searched, and relevant randomized controlled trials were identified. Out of 60 articles selected for systematic review, 38 were included in the network meta-analysis, categorized into 8 distinct antioxidant-supplemented groups and placebo. All groups significantly increased macular pigment optical density and contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequency, whereas only the antioxidant mixture + lutein (L) + fatty acid combination exhibited significant improvements in visual acuity (hazard ratio = -0.15; 95% confidence interval: -0.28, -0.02) and L + zeaxanthin combination for photostress recovery time (hazard ratio = -5.75; 95% confidence interval: -8.80, -1.70). Especially, the L + zeaxanthin + fatty acid combination was ranked best for macular pigment optical density (surface under the cumulative ranking: 99.3%) and second best for contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequency (67.7%). However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to low quality of evidence, primarily influenced by indirectness and potential publication bias. Overall, antioxidant supplementation was estimated to improve eye health parameters, whereas different combinations of antioxidants may also have varying effects on improving visual health from multiple perspectives. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022369250.

04
META-ANALYSIS BMC gastroenterology (2024) PMID: 38287248 ↗
Not all carotenoids can reduce the risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in BMC gastroenterology (OR 0.71). Key conclusion: Considering that evidence from cohort studies is generally considered stronger than evidence from case-control studies, and high-quality randomized controlled trials show no significant association between carotenoids and gastric cancer incidence, current evidence does not suppor
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is characterized by high invasiveness, heterogeneity, and late diagnosis, leading to high incidence and mortality rates. It is a significant public health concern globally. Early prevention is crucial in reducing the occurrence of gastric cancer, and dietary prevention, particularly focusing on carotenoids, has been considered a convenient and effective approach. However, the association between carotenoid intake and gastric cancer incidence remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception to January 5, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened search results, extracted relevant data, and evaluated study quality. Statistical analysis was performed using the "metan" command in STATA 16 software. Random-effects or fixed-effects models were chosen based on the magnitude of heterogeneity among studies. RESULTS: This study included a total of 35 publications, consisting of 23 case-control studies and 12 cohort studies. Meta-analysis of case-control studies showed that alpha-carotene (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.92), beta-carotene (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.53-0.72), and lutein (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.97) significantly reduced the risk of gastric cancer, while beta-cryptoxanthin (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.75-1.04) and lycopene (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.00) showed no significant correlation. Meta-analysis of cohort studies indicated no significant associations between any of the five carotenoids and gastric cancer incidence (alpha-carotene: RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.54-1.23; beta-carotene: RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64-1.16; beta-cryptoxanthin: RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64-1.16; lutein: RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.69-1.29; lycopene: RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.69-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between carotenoids and gastric cancer incidence may vary depending on the type of study conducted. Considering that evidence from cohort studies is generally considered stronger than evidence from case-control studies, and high-quality randomized controlled trials show no significant association between carotenoids and gastric cancer incidence, current evidence does not support the supplem

05
META-ANALYSIS Journal of the American Nutrition Association (2024) PMID: 37191618 ↗
Moderators of Caffeine's Effects on Jumping Performance in Females: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of the American Nutrition Association involving n = 197 participants. Key conclusion: The test for subgroup differences indicated that the ergogenic effects of caffeine were significantly greater in the follicular phase compared to all other conditions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of caffeine's effects on vertical jumping performance in females, with subgroup analyses for potential moderators, including phase of the menstrual cycle, testing time of day, caffeine dose, and test type. Fifteen studies were included in the review (n = 197). Their data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis of effect sizes (Hedges' g). In the main meta-analysis, we found an ergogenic effect of caffeine on jumping performance (g: 0.28). An ergogenic effect of caffeine on jumping performance was found when the testing was carried out in the luteal phase (g: 0.24), follicular phase (g: 0.52), luteal or follicular phase (g: 0.31), and when the phase was not specified (g: 0.21). The test for subgroup differences indicated that the ergogenic effects of caffeine were significantly greater in the follicular phase compared to all other conditions. An ergogenic effect of caffeine on jumping performance was found when the testing was carried out in the morning (g: 0.38), evening (g: 0.19), mixed morning or evening (g: 0.38), and when time was not specified (g: 0.32), with no subgroup differences. An ergogenic effect of caffeine on jumping performance was found when the dose was ≤3 mg/kg (g: 0.21), or >3 mg/kg (g: 0.37), with no subgroup differences. An ergogenic effect of caffeine on jumping performance was found in the countermovement jump test (g: 0.26) and squat jump test (g: 0.35), with no subgroup differences. In summary, caffeine ingestion is ergogenic for vertical jumping performance in females, and it seems that the magnitude of these effects is the largest in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Plain Language Summary: In the main meta-analysis, which included 15 studies and ∼200 participants, we found a small but very precise ergogenic effect of caffeine on vertical jumping performance in females.In a subgroup analysis for phase of the menstrual cycle, the ergogenic effects of caffeine on jumping performance were the largest in the follicular phase.An ergogenic effect of caffeine was consistently found in analyses for testing time of day (morning, evening, mixed morning or evening, or not

06
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition reviews (2023) PMID: 37094947 ↗
Effect of xanthophyll-rich food and supplement intake on visual outcomes in healthy adults and those with eye disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition reviews; statistical significance reported at p = 0 (MD 0.08). Key conclusion: Additional improvement in visual acuity was observed in patients with eye disease.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

CONTEXT: Xanthophyll intake is known to improve eye health; however, its benefits on visual outcomes have not been systematically studied, particularly in a population with eye diseases. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression were conducted to investigate the effect of xanthophyll intake on visual outcomes, and further subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of eye disease status. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched, and relevant randomized controlled trials were identified. DATA EXTRACTION: For systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression, 43, 25, and 21 articles were selected, respectively. DATA ANALYSIS: Xanthophyll intake enhanced macular pigment optical density (MPOD) for both heterochromatic flicker photometry (weighted mean difference [WMD], 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.07) and autofluorescence imaging (WMD, 0.08; 95%CI, 0.05-0.11) measurements and decreased photostress recovery time (WMD, -2.35; 95%CI, -4.49 to -0.20). While enhancement in visual acuity logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution was observed in response to the xanthophyll-rich food and supplement intake only for patients with eye disease (WMD, -0.04; 95%CI, -0.07 to -0.01). Meta-regression showed a positive correlation between change in MPOD (heterochromatic flicker photometry) and the corresponding change in serum lutein levels (regression coefficient = 0.068; P = 0.00). CONCLUSION: Intake of xanthophyll-rich food or supplements can improve eye health. Additional improvement in visual acuity was observed in patients with eye disease. A positive association between MPOD and serum lutein level, while absent with dietary xanthophyll intake, suggests the importance of bioavailability when examining the effect of xanthophyll on eye health. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021295337. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

07
META-ANALYSIS Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators (2023) PMID: 36336325 ↗
The effect of lutein and Zeaxanthine on dyslipidemia: A meta-analysis study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators (MD -3.82). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: L/Z administration could be an effective treatment for improving circulating HDL-C concentration in elderly adults.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: The relationship between circulating Lutein and zeaxanthin (L/Z) concentrations, and plasma lipoproteins has been indicated by observational studies. However, the beneficial impact of L/Z administration on dyslipidemia are unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of oral intake of L/Z on circulating total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), as well as high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. METHODS: We electronically assessed all eligible interventional studies through different electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, ISI -Web of Science, and Cochrane library until Jun 2021. After identifying the quality of each included randomized controlled trials, they were evaluated by assessing the risk-difference between treatment and control groups by pooling available data on net change of serum LDL-C, HDL-C, and Cholesterol. RESULTS: L/Z supplementation has null effect on circulating levels of TC (WMD: -3.82 95% CI: -13.83, 6.18; I-square: 85.2%), and LDL-C (WMD: -4.54; 95% CI: -11.5, 2.48; I-square: 83.9%). In contrast, L/Z treatment could significantly increase HDL-C levels in older adults (WMD: 4.06; 95% CI: 0.64, 7.48; I-square: 50.7%). CONCLUSION: L/Z administration could be an effective treatment for improving circulating HDL-C concentration in elderly adults.

08
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2022) PMID: 36296956 ↗
The Effect of Dietary Supplementations on Delaying the Progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 5,634 participants (SMD -1.99). Key conclusion: Conclusions: Combinations of lutein and zeaxanthin with n-3 LC-PUFA might be beneficial in preventing AMD progression and deterioration of visual function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Purpose: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a neurodegenerative ophthalmic disease. The purpose of this systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis was to evaluate if dietary supplementation alone or in combinations might delay the progression of any of the stages of AMD. Methods: A SR and meta-analysis identifying cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of supplements in patients diagnosed with AMD. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched through 8th October 2021. Results: Twenty studies, examining 5634 participants ranging from 55 to 80 years, were included in the SR. Eight studies were selected for meta-analysis (414 and 216 subjects in the intervention and control groups). Lutein and zeaxanthin plus n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 LC-PUFA) supplementation showed significant improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (SMD: -1.99, 95% CI: -3.33, -0.65) compared to the control group. Multifocal electroretinogram results (mfERG) were significantly improved overall (SMD: 4.59, 95% CI: 1.75, 7.43) after lutein plus zeaxanthin supplementation. Conclusions: Combinations of lutein and zeaxanthin with n-3 LC-PUFA might be beneficial in preventing AMD progression and deterioration of visual function. Our results encourage initiating further studies with combinations of n-3 LC-PUFA, lutein, and zeaxanthin especially in early AMD patients.

09
META-ANALYSIS Seminars in ophthalmology (2022) PMID: 34995151 ↗
Efficacy of different nutrients in age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Seminars in ophthalmology involving n = 85,321 participants (RR 0.45). Key conclusion: The nutrient of zinc and carotenoids (lutein/zeaxanthin) supplementation were associated with better improvement in VA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has become a predominant global health concern. The visual function of individuals with AMD seems to improve with dietary antioxidants. We assessed the efficacy of different antioxidants (carotenoids, zinc, vitamin E, and multivitamin) on visual function and the incidence of developing late AMD. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for related published studies. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different nutrients. The main outcomes measurements included changes in visual acuity (VA), and the rate of developing late AMD. The network meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020171288). RESULTS: We identified 13 studies, including 85321 individuals randomly assigned to different nutrients or placebo groups. In the network meta-analysis, we found that there was more risk of progression to late AMD in the multivitamin group than carotenoids and vitamin E groups (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.65; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.79; RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.67). The nutrients of zinc and carotenoids (Lutein/Zeaxanthin) ranked first and second and showed better improvement in VA. The efficacy of carotenoids (β-carotene) ranked first for delaying the progress of AMD among all of the four treatments. CONCLUSION: Taking multivitamin supplementation may not prevent the development of late AMD. The nutrient of zinc and carotenoids (lutein/zeaxanthin) supplementation were associated with better improvement in VA. Carotenoids (β-carotene) were the most likely to prevent the progression of late AMD.

10
META-ANALYSIS Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) (2021) PMID: 34157098 ↗
The Effect of Lutein/Zeaxanthin Intake on Human Macular Pigment Optical Density: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) involving n = 3,189 participants (MD 0.02). Key conclusion: Future research is needed to determine the minimum dose and duration of lutein/zeaxanthin intake that is associated with a clinically important change in MPOD or visual function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin are the only carotenoids found in the human macula and may have a role in visual function. These carotenoids are reported to protect the retina, and thus vision, as antioxidants and by acting as a blue light filter. Our objective was to determine a minimum concentration of lutein/zeaxanthin intake that is associated with a statistically significant and/or clinically important change in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) among adults with healthy eyes. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and the Commonwealth of Agriculture Bureau for English-language studies through to July 2020. Two reviewers screened results to identify studies that evaluated supplements or dietary sources of lutein/zeaxanthin on MPOD among adults with healthy eyes. One reviewer extracted data and assessed strength of evidence, which was confirmed by a second reviewer. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were stratified by total lutein/zeaxanthin dose. We included 46 studies (N = 3189 participants; mean age = 43 y; 42% male). There was no statistically significant change in MPOD among studies evaluating <5 mg/d of total lutein/zeaxanthin intake which primarily assessed dietary interventions for 3-6 mo (pooled mean difference, 0.02; 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.05). The pooled mean increase in MPOD was 0.04 units (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.07) among studies evaluating 5 to <20 mg/d of lutein/zeaxanthin and was 0.11 units (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.16) among studies evaluating ≥20 mg/d of lutein/zeaxanthin for 3-12 mo. MPOD increased with lutein/zeaxanthin intake, particularly at higher doses, among adults with healthy eyes. The effects of lutein/zeaxanthin intake at doses <5 mg/d or from dietary sources is less clear. Increased lutein/zeaxanthin intake can help with maintaining ocular health. Future research is needed to determine the minimum dose and duration of lutein/zeaxanthin intake that is associated with a clinically important change in MPOD or visual function. © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category