NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Artemisia (Mugwort)

TRADITIONAL ASIAN · Evidence Monograph

Artemisia (Mugwort) is an evidence-graded traditional asian monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 4 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 698 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 4 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 4 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 698
Reported Trial Dosages 680 mg/day · 240 mg · 50 mg
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 5 weeks · 13 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (680 mg/day · 240 mg · 50 mg) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary traditional asian clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (10 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (4 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 4 reviews)
01

What Is Artemisia (Mugwort) & Why Does Form Matter?

Artemisia (Mugwort) is classified under TRADITIONAL ASIAN and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (680 mg/day, 240 mg, 50 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Artemisia (Mugwort) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (4 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Artemisia (Mugwort) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Artemisia (Mugwort) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 4 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 698 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:34390100 (2021) — "Effect of Artemisia extract on glycemic control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial." (CONCLUSION: Supplementation with Artemisia extract may reduce HOMA-IR, but beneficial effects on other markers such as FBG requires further investigations.) • PMID:40816579 (2025) — "Safety and efficacy of Artemisia argyi extract RW0117 for functional dyspepsia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study." (CONCLUSION: In conclusion, treatment with RW0117 was safe and showed significant potential for reducing FD symptoms.) • PMID:40604958 (2025) — "ARTEMISIA: a mechanistic study of a novel Janus kinase 1 inhibitor to advance molecular understanding and precision medicine in asthma." (In addition to sampling the airway directly, with parall)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 680 mg/day · 240 mg · 50 mg over 12 weeks · 5 weeks · 13 weeks · 26 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Artemisia (Mugwort), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (680 mg/day · 240 mg · 50 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 10 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS International journal of clinical practice (2021) PMID: 34390100 ↗
Effect of Artemisia extract on glycemic control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of clinical practice; statistical significance reported at p = 0.019. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Supplementation with Artemisia extract may reduce HOMA-IR, but beneficial effects on other markers such as FBG requires further investigations.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Animal and human studies have indicated anti-diabetic effect of Asteraceae. The present study aimed to systematically review and analyse randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of Artemisia extract on glycemic status in patients with impaired glycemic control. METHODS: Web of Science, Cochrane library, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched from the earliest possible date up to 7th October 2020. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis showed that supplementation with Artemisia extract decreased homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (-0.734, 95% CI: -1.236 to -0.232, P = .019) in comparison to placebo. However, reductions in fasting blood glucose (FBG) (-0.595, 95% CI: -1.566 to 0.376, P = .164), insulin (-0.322, 95% CI: -1.047 to 0.404, P = .286) and glycated haemoglobin (-0.106, 95% CI: -0.840 to 0.629, P = .678) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Supplementation with Artemisia extract may reduce HOMA-IR, but beneficial effects on other markers such as FBG requires further investigations. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of ethnopharmacology (2025) PMID: 40816579 ↗
Safety and efficacy of Artemisia argyi extract RW0117 for functional dyspepsia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of ethnopharmacology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: In conclusion, treatment with RW0117 was safe and showed significant potential for reducing FD symptoms.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Artemisia argyi (A. argyi) is a herbaceous perennial plant that has long been employed in traditional medicine for the management of gastrointestinal conditions such as abdominal pain, gastric ulcer, diarrhea, and gastritis. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RW0117, an ethanol extract of A. argyi, in alleviating the symptoms of functional dyspepsia (FD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, participants were randomly assigned to receive either one tablet of RW0117 (680 mg/day, containing 240 mg of ethanol extract of A. argyi) or one placebo tablet for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline on the gastrointestinal symptom-rating scale (GSRS). Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline in the total GSRS score, gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS), Nepean Dyspepsia Index-Korean version (NDI-K) score, Functional Dyspepsia-related Quality of Life (FD-QoL), and adverse events. RESULTS: This study showed that five individual symptoms in the upper abdominal GSRS and two symptoms in the lower abdominal GSRS, as well as the total GSRS scores, were improved significantly in the RW0117 group compared to the placebo group. Furthermore, patients receiving RW0117 showed significant improvements in GIS, NDI-K, and FD-QoL scores at the end of treatment compared to the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, treatment with RW0117 was safe and showed significant potential for reducing FD symptoms.

03
CLINICAL STUDY Respiratory research (2025) PMID: 40604958 ↗
ARTEMISIA: a mechanistic study of a novel Janus kinase 1 inhibitor to advance molecular understanding and precision medicine in asthma.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Respiratory research. Key conclusion: In addition to sampling the airway directly, with parall
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Patients with uncontrolled asthma despite the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), may have a variety of biological pathways driving their airway inflammation. Londamocitinib (AZD4604), a selective, inhaled, Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, has been designed to target a broad inflammatory cytokine profile including those classically unresponsive to ICS. The ARTEMISIA mechanistic study aims to provide a clear understanding of the pathways impacted by londamocitinib in the lung, determine how this impact is reflected in the nose and periphery, and identify candidate biomarkers of londamocitinib-treatment response in asthma. This article reports the design and objectives of the ARTEMISIA study. METHODS: ARTEMISIA is a placebo-controlled, double-blind study of adults with moderate-to-severe asthma aiming to assess the effects of inhaled londamocitinib on Type 2 (T2) and non-T2 driven inflammatory pathways. Extensive parallel bio-sampling of the lung target tissue, nasal mucosa, blood and urine will be performed prior to the first dose and after 4-weeks of treatment with either londamocitinib or placebo. The main objectives of the study are to evaluate the effect of londamocitinib on gene expression in endobronchial brushings and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) phosphorylation in endobronchial biopsies. Key exploratory objectives include investigating the correlation between inflammatory phenotype-specific bronchial epithelial gene signatures and other biomarkers in the lung and peripheral samples; as well as analysis of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic biomarkers in the nose, blood, and urine. DISCUSSION: ARTEMISIA commenced recruitment in 2024 and is poised to deliver a deep understanding of the mechanism of action of londamocitinib and its potential to impact on a population of asthmatics with high unmet need. The multiomic analysis of paired central and peripheral samples may reveal novel insights into the connection and translation between these compartments, deepen understanding of airways disease, and identify novel candidate biomarkers for asthma and JAK activity. In addition to sampling the airway directly, with parall

04
CLINICAL STUDY European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology (2025) PMID: 39987413 ↗
Comparative safety analysis of coseasonal versus preseasonal Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology involving n = 14 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstra
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) usually seek treatment when symptoms become unbearable during the pollen season. It remains unclear whether initiating sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during the pollen season affects patients' safety. This study aims to compare the tolerability of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season versus before the season. METHODS: Ninety patients with Artemisia-induced SAR were recruited and equally randomized into the coseasonal initiation treatment (COS-SLIT) group and the preseasonal initiation treatment (PRE-SLIT) group. The COS-SLIT group started SLIT when allergic symptoms occurred during the 2022 pollen season, while the PRE-SLIT group began SLIT four months before the expected season in 2022. Patients were categorized as mild symptoms or moderate-severe symptoms group based on the level of visual analog scale (VAS) scores evaluated during the 2021 pollen season. The incidence, frequency, performance, and alleviating measures of adverse events (AEs) were analyzed after the up-dosing phase (5 weeks), at three months (13 weeks), six months (26 weeks), and twelve months (52 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (32 patients in the COS-SLIT group and 40 patients in the PRE-SLIT) were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 33 reported a total of 78 AEs. No significant difference was found in the frequency and number of patients experiencing AEs between the COS-SLIT and PRE-SLIT groups during the four follow-up periods (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the symptoms or alleviating measures of AEs between the two groups in general (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, the most common AEs in the COS-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 14), lip edema (n = 10), and cough (n = 4), while in the PRE-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 12), lip edema (n = 8), and ocular pruritus (n = 6). Symptomatic drugs were the most common alleviating measures in both groups (61.29% in COS-SLIT and 64.52% in PRE-SLIT, p > 0.05). Patients with mild and moderate-severe symptoms showed comparable tolerability at different initiation timing (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstra

05
CLINICAL STUDY European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology (2025) PMID: 39611955 ↗
Coseasonal initiation of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy in children and adult patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology involving n = 25 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Coseasonal initiating Artemisia annua SLIT demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety for children and adult patients with ARC.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of coseasonal initiation of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for children and adult patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). METHODS: A total of 50 patients (aged 4-60 years) with ARC who visited hospital from July to September 2022 were enrolled and randomly divided into the SLIT (n = 25) and control group (n = 25). Patients in SLIT group received Artemisia annua SLIT and patients in control group only received symptomatic medication. The study continued for 1 year. Four nasal symptom scores, two eye symptom scores, and medication usage of the patients during 2021 (baseline) and 2023 pollen seasons were recorded, as well as adverse events (AEs) during the study. RESULTS: Finally, 20 patients of SLIT group and 22 patients of control group completed this study. Compared with the baseline, the levels of total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (TRSS), total medication score (TMS), and combined symptom and medication score for rhinoconjunctivitis (CSMS-RC) experienced significant reductions after 1 year SLIT. Additionally, these outcomes also decreased significantly in SLIT group when compared with the control group during 2023 pollen season. Especially, there were more patients showed symptoms reduction, medication use decrease, and efficacy improvement in the SLIT group. Notably, no severe AEs were observed throughout the treatment course among patients receiving SLIT. CONCLUSIONS: Coseasonal initiating Artemisia annua SLIT demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety for children and adult patients with ARC. © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) AIDS research and therapy (2024) PMID: 38627722 ↗
Evaluation of the effects of Artemisia Annua L. and Moringa Oleifera Lam. on CD4 count and viral load among PLWH on ART at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in AIDS research and therapy; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: oleifera leaf powders taken once a day together with the routine standard of care produced a significant increase in CD4 count, WBCs, platelets, and viral load suppression among individuals on ART.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Initiation of ART among people living with HIV (PLWH) having a CD4 count ≤ 350cells/µl, produces poor immunological recovery, putting them at a high risk of opportunistic infections. To mitigate this, PLWH on ART in Uganda frequently use herbal remedies like Artemisia annua and Moringa oleifera, but their clinical benefits and potential antiretroviral (ARV) interactions remain unknown. This study examined the impact of A. annua and M. oleifera on CD4 count, viral load, and potential ARV interactions among PLWH on ART at an HIV clinic in Uganda. METHODS: 282 HIV-positive participants on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with a CD4 count ≤ 350cells/µl were randomized in a double-blind clinical trial to receive daily, in addition to their routine standard of care either; 1) A. annua leaf powder, 2) A. annua plus M. oleifera, and 3) routine standard of care only. Change in the CD4 count at 12 months was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included changes in viral load, complete blood count, and ARV plasma levels. Participants were followed up for a year and outcomes were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months of patient follow-up, in addition to standard of care, administration of A. annua + M. oleifera resulted in an absolute mean CD4 increment of 105.06 cells/µl, (p < 0.001), while administration of A. annua plus routine standard of care registered an absolute mean CD4 increment of 60.84 cells/µl, (p = 0.001) compared to the control group. The A. annua plus M. oleifera treatment significantly reduced viral load (p = 0.022) and increased platelet count (p = 0.025) and white blood cell counts (p = 0.003) compared to standard care alone, with no significant difference in ARV plasma levels across the groups. CONCLUSION: A combination of A. annua and M. oleifera leaf powders taken once a day together with the routine standard of care produced a significant increase in CD4 count, WBCs, platelets, and viral load suppression among individuals on ART. A. annua and M. oleifera have potential to offer an affordable alternative remedy for managing HIV infection, particularly in low-resource communities lacking ART access. TRIAL REGISTRATION:

07
CLINICAL STUDY American journal of otolaryngology (2023) PMID: 37478537 ↗
Clinical efficacy in one-year treatment with Artemisia annua-SLIT drops in monosensitized and polysensitized individuals.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in American journal of otolaryngology involving n = 75 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Artemisia annua-SLIT was proven effective, tolerable and safe in patients with SARC after nearly one year of treatment, whether monosensitization or polysensitization.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SARC) caused by Artemisia seriously affects patients' quality of life in northern China. This study aimed to estimate further the efficacy and safety of a one-year course of Artemisia annua-sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) on SARC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, controlled, single-centre study involving 150 SARC patients induced by Artemisia, randomized to SLIT group (n = 75, SLIT along with pharmacotherapy) or control group (n = 75, pharmacotherapy only). According to the skin prick test (SPT) results, the SLIT group was divided into monosensitized and polysensitized groups to analyze the influence of sensitization status on the efficacy of Artemisia annua-SLIT. The clinical indicators of this study were total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (TRSS), total medication score (TMS), combined scores of medication and rhinoconjunctivitis symptom (CSMRS), and score of visual analog scale (VAS). Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Daily administration of the drops was recorded in diaries by the patients. RESULTS: After nearly one year of treatment and follow-ups, there was a significant decline in TRSS, TMS, CSMRS, and VAS from the baseline scores in the SLIT group (p < 0.001). However, as pollen counts increased in 2022, indicators above in the control group increased significantly during the peak pollen phase (PPP) in 2022 grass pollen season (GPS) compared to the baseline. Meanwhile, we found no significant difference in TRSS, TMS, CSMRS, and VAS between the monosensitized and polysensitized groups (p > 0.05). Moreover, the result indicated that the clinical improvement in TRSS, TMS, CSMRS, and VAS was still observed in polysensitized patients who were allergic to Artemisia pollen and sensitized to house dust mite (HDM) (n = 15) in PPP of 2022, compared to the baseline value (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Artemisia annua-SLIT was proven effective, tolerable and safe in patients with SARC after nearly one year of treatment, whether monosensitization or polysensitization.

08
CLINICAL STUDY International archives of allergy and immunology (2022) PMID: 35413714 ↗
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Artesimia annua-Sublingual Immunotherapy in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Patients Based on Different Intervention Time.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International archives of allergy and immunology involving n = 29 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This study proved that A.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Artemisia is a major kind of grass pollen in Northern China that can cause multiple kinds of common allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis (AR), conjunctivitis, or asthma. Recently, Artemisia annua Allergens Sublingual Immunotherapy Drops have been proved effective and safe for treating seasonal AR (SAR) with or without allergic conjunctivitis patients and were available in China. We sought to further investigate the different intervention times of A. annua-sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for evaluating efficacy and safety in patients with SAR. METHODS: A total of 88 subjects aged 18-52 years with SAR were enrolled and randomized into the SLIT group and control group. Forty-five patients received a course of SLIT with A. annua extracts along with pharmacotherapy as SLIT group and 43 patients only used symptomatic drugs as control group. Furthermore, SLIT group was randomly divided into 12-13 weeks' pre-seasonal treatment group and 8-9 weeks' pre-seasonal treatment group to receive different duration of SLIT before pollen season. Monosensitized and polysensitized groups were also the subgroups of SLIT group according to the sensitization status of patients. The combined symptom and medication score (CSMS), total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total medication score (TMS), visual analog score (VAS) were evaluated during the peak pollen phase in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Safety was assessed according to adverse events (AEs) reported. RESULTS: Compared to control group, CSMS, TNSS, TMS, VAS were significantly improved during the course of SLIT (p < 0.001). Besides, clinical improvement in nasal symptoms and reduction of medication use was also observed in SLIT group, compared to the baseline value (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, we observed that there was no significant difference between monosensitized group (n = 8) and polysensitized group (n = 29), as well as 12-13 weeks' preseasonal treatment group (n = 20) and 8-9 weeks' pre-seasonal treatment group (n = 17) belonging to the SLIT group in clinical efficacy (p > 0.05). No severe systemic AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study proved that A. annua-SLIT can provide equivalent efficacy and safety fo

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of ethnopharmacology (2022) PMID: 35114338 ↗
Mild moxibustion for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D): A randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of ethnopharmacology involving n = 76 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that mild moxibustion may be more effective than placebo moxibustion for the treatment of IBS-D, with effects lasting up to 12 weeks.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Moxibustion therapy is a traditional Chinese medicine external treatment method, which involves crushing dried herb Artemisia argyi H. Lév. & Vanio and rolling it into a long cigarette-like strip, igniting it and using its warmth to stimulate specific acupuncture points for a certain period of time. It is often used in Asia to treat various diseases, especially abdominal pain. Clinical reports suggest that acupuncture and moxibustion are the effective treatment for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D). However, there is no placebo-controlled study to prove its safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of mild moxibustion (MM) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) through comparisons with those of placebo moxibustion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-site, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian in China and enrolled 76 participants who met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for IBS-D between May 2017 and December 2019. 76 participants were randomized to either mild moxibustion (MM) or placebo moxibustion group (PM) in a 1:1 ratio. 18 sessions of MM or PM were implemented over the course of 6 weeks (3 times per week). The primary outcome was adequate relief after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Of 76 patients with IBS-D who were randomized (38 in the MM group and 38 in the PM group) were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set. After treatment at week 6, the response rate was significantly higher in the MM group than the PM group (81.58% vs. 36.84%) with an estimated difference of 44.74 (95% CI, 23.46 to 66.02, P < 0.001). No participant reported severe adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that mild moxibustion may be more effective than placebo moxibustion for the treatment of IBS-D, with effects lasting up to 12 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2100046852. Registered 29 May 2021 - Retrospectively registered, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=127000.

10
CLINICAL STUDY AIDS research and human retroviruses (2022) PMID: 33913736 ↗
Effects of Artesunate Tablet on Immune Activation and Reconstitution Among Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy-Treated Patients with Incomplete Immune Responses.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in AIDS research and human retroviruses involving n = 45 participants. Key conclusion: However, artesunate tablet did appear to reduce the level of T cell apoptosis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The level of T cell activation is a better predictor of CD4+ T cell depletion in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) patients than viral load. Artesunate is an artemisinin derivative that has an immunomodulatory effect. This study investigated whether artesunate tablet reduces T cell activation and improves immune reconstitution among patients with suboptimal immune recovery despite receiving long-term effective HAART. This was a randomized prospective parallel open-label trial consisting of 45 participants whose plasma HIV load was effectively suppressed by HAART for >18 months and who had CD4+ T cell counts of <300 cells/μL or an increase of <20% from baseline. The patients were randomized 2:1 into the artesunate group or the control group and received artesunate tablets (orally, 50 mg two times daily) combined with HAART or HAART alone, respectively. T cell subsets, activation markers, clinical symptoms, viral load, and side effects were assessed. By 48 weeks, artesunate tablet did not improve CD4+ T cell recovery or reduce the activation of T cell subsets but induced in a smaller decline in the expression of T cell activation markers among HAART patients with incomplete immune responses. However, artesunate tablet did appear to reduce the level of T cell apoptosis. One subject developed moderate anemia. Long-term use of artesunate tablet is unlikely to produce substantial clinical benefits in patients receiving HAART who exhibit an incomplete immune response.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category