NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

Citrulline Malate (Sport)

SPORTS · Evidence Monograph

Citrulline Malate (Sport) is an evidence-graded sports monograph evaluated across 12 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 377 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 12 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 7 RCTs (10 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 377
Reported Trial Dosages 8 g · 500 mg · 12 g
Trial Duration Range 3 days
Reading Time ~6 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 12 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (8 g · 500 mg · 12 g) over a structured 3 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary sports clinical efficacy (12 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (9 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (7 RCTs · 10 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Citrulline Malate (Sport) & Why Does Form Matter?

Citrulline Malate (Sport) is classified under SPORTS and has been investigated across 12 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (8 g, 500 mg, 12 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Citrulline Malate (Sport) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (7 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Citrulline Malate (Sport) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Citrulline Malate (Sport) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 12 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials (10 double-blind, n = 377 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:34010809 (2021) — "Acute Effect of Citrulline Malate on Repetition Performance During Strength Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (The subanalysis for the lower body resulted in a tendency for an effect of the supplement (8.1 ± 8.4%, SMD: 0.27, p = .051) with no significant effect for the upper body (5.7 ± 8.4%, SMD: 0.16, p = .131).) • PMID:33308806 (2020) — "Effect of citrulline on post-exercise rating of perceived exertion, muscle soreness, and blood lactate levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Citrulline supplements significantly reduced post-exercise RPE and muscle soreness without affecting blood lactate levels.) • PMID:41006371 (2025) — "Acute effects of combined supplementation of L-arginine and citrulline malate on aerobic, anaerobic, and CrossFit exercise performance." (The results revealed no significant improvement in performance with supplementation in comparison to placebo, except for a shorter time to reach peak power in the Wingate test.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 8 g · 500 mg · 12 g · 5.3 g over 3 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Citrulline Malate (Sport), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (8 g · 500 mg · 12 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 3 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (12 Studies) · 9 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism (2021) PMID: 34010809 ↗
Acute Effect of Citrulline Malate on Repetition Performance During Strength Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism involving n = 101 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.022 (SMD 0.196). Key conclusion: The subanalysis for the lower body resulted in a tendency for an effect of the supplement (8.1 ± 8.4%, SMD: 0.27, p = .051) with no significant effect for the upper body (5.7 ± 8.4%, SMD: 0.16, p = .131).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Citrulline malate (CitMal) is a dietary supplement that is suggested to enhance strength training performance. However, there is conflicting evidence on this matter. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether supplementing with CitMal prior to strength training could increase the total number of repetitions performed before reaching voluntary muscular failure. A systematic search was conducted wherein the inclusion criteria were double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in healthy participants that examined the effect of CitMal on repetitions to failure during upper body and lower body resistance exercises. The Hedges's g standardized mean differences (SMD) between the placebo and CitMal trials were calculated and used in a random effect model. Two separate subanalyses were performed for upper body and lower body exercises. Eight studies, including 137 participants who consisted of strength-trained men (n = 101) and women (n = 26) in addition to untrained men (n = 9), fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Across the studies, 14 single-joint and multijoint exercises were performed with an average of 51 ± 23 total repetitions during 5 ± 3 sets per exercise at ∼70% of one-repetition maximum. Supplementing with 6-8 g of CitMal 40-60 min before exercise increased repetitions by 3 ± 5 (6.4 ± 7.9%) compared with placebo (p = .022) with a small SMD (0.196). The subanalysis for the lower body resulted in a tendency for an effect of the supplement (8.1 ± 8.4%, SMD: 0.27, p = .051) with no significant effect for the upper body (5.7 ± 8.4%, SMD: 0.16, p = .131). The current analysis observed a small ergogenic effect of CitMal compared with placebo. Acute CitMal supplementation may, therefore, delay fatigue and enhance muscle endurance during high-intensity strength training.

02
META-ANALYSIS Journal of sport and health science (2020) PMID: 33308806 ↗
Effect of citrulline on post-exercise rating of perceived exertion, muscle soreness, and blood lactate levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of sport and health science involving n = 206 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Citrulline supplements significantly reduced post-exercise RPE and muscle soreness without affecting blood lactate levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Citrulline is one of the non-essential amino acids that is thought to improve exercise performance and reduce post-exercise muscle soreness. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of citrulline supplements on the post-exercise rating of perceived exertion (RPE), muscle soreness, and blood lactate levels. METHODS: A random effects model was used to calculate the effect sizes due to the high variability in the study design and study populations of the articles included. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. Eligibility for study inclusion was limited to studies that were randomized controlled trials involving healthy individuals and that investigated the acute effect of citrulline supplements on RPE, muscle soreness, and blood lactate levels. The supplementation time frame was limited to 2 h before exercise. The types and number of participants, types of exercise tests performed, supplementation protocols for L-citrulline or citrulline malate, and primary (RPE and muscle soreness) and secondary (blood lactate level) study outcomes were extracted from the identified studies. RESULTS: The analysis included 13 eligible articles including a total of 206 participants. The most frequent dosage used in the studies was 8 g of citrulline malate. Citrulline supplementation significantly reduced RPE (n = 7, p = 0.03) and muscle soreness 24-h and 48-h after post-exercise (n = 7, p = 0.04; n = 6, p = 0.25, respectively). However, citrulline supplementation did not significantly reduce muscle soreness 72-h post-exercise (n = 4, p = 0.62) or lower blood lactate levels (n = 8, p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Citrulline supplements significantly reduced post-exercise RPE and muscle soreness without affecting blood lactate levels.

03
CLINICAL STUDY Scientific reports (2025) PMID: 41006371 ↗
Acute effects of combined supplementation of L-arginine and citrulline malate on aerobic, anaerobic, and CrossFit exercise performance.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Scientific reports involving n = 16 participants. Key conclusion: The results revealed no significant improvement in performance with supplementation in comparison to placebo, except for a shorter time to reach peak power in the Wingate test.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This study investigated the effects of combined L-arginine (Arg) and citrulline-malate (CM) supplementation on aerobic, anaerobic, and high-intensity interval training in healthy, trained men. Both Arg and CM are widely marketed for their potential ergogenic effects, as Arg serves as a precursor to nitric oxide (NO), which may support vasodilation, muscle contractility, and exercise performance. Arg and CM are hypothesized to exert synergistic effects due to their complementary roles in NO synthesis. Citrulline can potentially enhance and prolong Arg availability, thereby amplifying NO-mediated vasodilation, nutrient delivery, and muscle performance during exercise. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 46 healthy, trained men aged 24.8 ± 5.0 years were divided into 3 exercise groups subjected to consuming 0.15 g/kg bodyweight of Arg and 0.1 g/kg bodyweight of CM prior. The participants were then randomly divided into three groups based on the exercise protocol:: the Wingate Anaerobic Test (n = 16), a 20 min CrossFit workout 'Cindy' (n = 16) consisting of continuous rounds of pull-ups, push-ups, and air squats to measure functional fitness and muscular endurance, or the Harvard Step Test (n = 14) a measurement of cardiovascular endurance and recovery. This design allowed for the evaluation of supplementation effects across multiple exercise modalities. The results revealed no significant improvement in performance with supplementation in comparison to placebo, except for a shorter time to reach peak power in the Wingate test. Findings suggest that the combined acute supplementation of Arg and CM, at the given dosages, may not provide substantial benefits for aerobic and anaerobic or CrossFit performance in active individuals. Future research with larger sample sizes and higher dosages, potentially adjusted for muscle mass, is recommended to determine whether chronic supplementation might yield greater ergogenic effects. © 2025. The Author(s).

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2025) PMID: 40733006 ↗
Impact of Chronic Nitrate and Citrulline Malate Supplementation on Performance and Recovery in Spanish Professional Female Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: These effects could reflect improved tolerance to high training loads and sustained NO3- availability during recovery.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Pre-season training is critical for developing tolerance to high physical demands in professional soccer, and nitric oxide (NO) precursors such as dietary nitrate (NO3-) and citrulline malate (CM) can support performance and recovery during this demanding phase. This study aimed to examine the effects of a four-week supplementation protocol combining 500 mg of NO3- from amaranth extract and 8 g of CM (NIT + CM) on external training load and post-match recovery in professional female soccer players during pre-season. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 34 female soccer players who received either the NIT + CM product or a placebo for four weeks during pre-season. Global positioning system (GPS)-derived external load was recorded throughout the intervention. Performance tests-a countermovement jump (CMJ) test and the Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT)-and blood sampling for plasma NO3- and nitrite (NO2-) concentrations were conducted at baseline and the day after a competitive match. Results: The supplementation with NIT + CM increased maximal speed (Vmax) throughout training and match play. During post-match testing, the NIT + CM group exhibited a significantly smaller decline in mean (Pmean) and minimum (Pmin) power during the WAnT, along with reduced power loss in both the first (0-15 s) and second (15-30 s) intervals. Plasma NO3- concentrations significantly increased from baseline in the NIT + CM group and remained elevated 24 h after the final dose, confirming sustained systemic exposure. Conclusions: Chronic NIT + CM supplementation may enhance Vmax and help preserve anaerobic performance the day after a match. These effects could reflect improved tolerance to high training loads and sustained NO3- availability during recovery.

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (2025) PMID: 40470618 ↗
Changes in resistance training performance, rating of perceived exertion, and blood biomarkers after six weeks of supplementation with L-citrulline vs. L-citrulline DL-malate in resistance-trained men: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Chronic citrulline supplementation seems to enhance upper body muscular endurance and post-exercise NOX response to RT, but there is no apparent difference between LC and CM in these aspects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of chronic supplementation with L-Citrulline (LC) vs. L-Citrulline DL-malate (CM) on resistance training (RT) performance. METHODS: Thirty-three resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to ingest LC (8 g), CM (12 g), or Placebo (PL) daily, along with participation in a 6-week RT protocol. Muscular strength (1-repetition maximum [1RM] for hack squat [HS] and bench press [BP]), muscular endurance (repetitions to failure [RTF] for HS, leg extension [LE], BP, and incline press [IP]), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and blood biomarkers (lactate, urea, and nitric oxide metabolites [NOX]) were assessed before and after the intervention. This study was registered on irct.ir (IRCTID: IRCT20221128056642N1). RESULTS: Comparing mean ∆ scores revealed a significant difference between LC and PL (p < 0.001) and between CM and PL (p = 0.026) for total upper body (the sum of BP and IP) RTF, but only a trend for difference between LC and PL (p = 0.070) for total lower body (the sum of HS and LE) RTF. A significant time effect for NOX was detected only for LC (p = 0.014) and CM (p = 0.003). In addition, a significant difference between CM and PL (p = 0.009) and a marginally significant difference between LC and PL (p = 0.057) was detected regarding post-exercise NOX values at post-intervention. There were no other between-group differences for any outcome measure. CONCLUSION: Chronic citrulline supplementation seems to enhance upper body muscular endurance and post-exercise NOX response to RT, but there is no apparent difference between LC and CM in these aspects.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism (2025) PMID: 39662304 ↗
Malate or Not? Acute Effects of L-Citrulline Versus Citrulline Malate on Neuromuscular Performance in Young, Trained Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism involving n = 21 participants. Key conclusion: In conclusion, CIT and CMA supplementation may not increase the neuromuscular performance during low- to moderate-volume resistance training sessions in young, trained adults.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

L-citrulline (CIT) supplementation seems to improve resistance training performance; yet, whether malate has additive ergogenic effects when combined with CIT is unknown. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial aimed to compare the acute effects of CIT versus citrulline malate (CMA) supplementation on neuromuscular performance and exertion and emotional perceptions in young, trained men and women. 43 (21 women; 24.2 ± 3.7 years) participants ingested a placebo, CIT (5.3 g of CIT), or CMA (5.3 g of CIT, 2.7 g of malate) 45 min before three experimental sessions in a counterbalanced manner. We evaluated the upper and lower limb maximal neuromuscular and ballistic performance through the two-point method and countermovement jump. Strength-endurance was assessed across three sets of 10 repetitions in the squat and bench press exercises. Exertion and emotional perceptions were evaluated before and after the assessment and during the strength-endurance assessment. CIT and CMA supplementation did not enhance maximal neuromuscular performance (all p ≥ .061, ηp2≤.066), or ballistic strength (all p ≥ .348, ηp2≤.025). Neither CIT nor CMA supplementation improved strength-endurance as observed in the total number of repetitions (all p ≥ .590, ηp2≤.013), repetitions before reaching velocity loss threshold (all p ≥ .623, ηp2≤.010), mean velocity (all p ≥ .792, ηp2≤.004), mean velocity decline (all p ≥ .293, ηp2≤.029), and mean velocity maintenance (all p ≥ .393 ηp2≤.022), or exertion and emotional perceptions (both p ≥ .306, ηp2≤.028). In conclusion, CIT and CMA supplementation may not increase the neuromuscular performance during low- to moderate-volume resistance training sessions in young, trained adults. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT05183893).

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2024) PMID: 39408204 ↗
Effects of Acute Citrulline Malate Supplementation on CrossFit(®) Exercise Performance: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.587. Key conclusion: No significant differences in post-exercise recovery time were observed (6.6 ± 4.7 h vs.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Given the increasing popularity of CrossFit® as a high-intensity functional training program and the potential benefits of citrulline malate (CM) in enhancing exercise performance through its role as a precursor to L-arginine and nitric oxide production, this study aimed to investigate the acute effects of CM supplementation on CrossFit® performance and cardiovascular function. Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design, 21 recreationally active participants (mean age 22.2 ± 2.6 years, mean body weight 75.9 ± 10.4 kg) with CrossFit® experience completed the "Cindy" workout under CM and placebo conditions. Participants consumed 4.4 g of CM or a placebo 60 min before the workout, and the performance was measured by the number of rounds completed. Secondary outcomes included heart rate response, time spent in different heart rate intensity zones, and post-exercise recovery time. The results indicated no significant difference in the number of rounds completed between the CM and placebo conditions (13.5 ± 5.2 vs. 13.8 ± 6.7 rounds, respectively; p = 0.587). However, the time spent in zone 4 (80-90% of HR max) was significantly increased in the CM condition (527 ± 395 s vs. 453 ± 334 s; p = 0.017), suggesting a potential benefit for aerobic capacity and anaerobic threshold. No significant differences in post-exercise recovery time were observed (6.6 ± 4.7 h vs. 6.9 ± 4.7 h; p = 0.475). This study highlights the need for further research with larger sample sizes, both genders, and different CM dosages to clarify these findings and better understand CM's role in enhancing athletic performance.

08
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of sport science (2024) PMID: 38874989 ↗
Effects of 3 days of citrulline malate supplementation on short-duration repeated sprint running performance in male team sport athletes.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Clinical Study published in European journal of sport science. Key conclusion: Author information: (1)School of Health and
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

8. Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Jun;24(6):758-765. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12090. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Effects of 3 days of citrulline malate supplementation on short-duration repeated sprint running performance in male team sport athletes. Faria VS(1), Egan B(1)(2). Author information: (1)School of Health and

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) European journal of nutrition (2023) PMID: 37450275 ↗
Effect of isolated and combined ingestion of caffeine and citrulline malate on resistance exercise and jumping performance: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of nutrition involving n = 18 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Caffeine ingestion appears to be ergogenic for muscular strength and muscular endurance, while adding CitMal does not seem to further enhance these effects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the isolated and combined effects of caffeine and citrulline malate (CitMal) on jumping performance, muscular strength, muscular endurance, and pain perception in resistance-trained participants. METHODS: Using a randomized and double-blind study design, 35 resistance-trained males (n = 18) and females (n = 17) completed four testing sessions following the ingestion of isolated caffeine (5 mg/kg), isolated CitMal (12 g), combined doses of caffeine and CitMal, and placebo. Supplements were ingested 60 min before performing a countermovement jump (CMJ) test (outcomes included jump height, rate of force development, peak force, and peak power), one-repetition maximum (1RM) squat and bench press, and repetitions to muscular failure in the squat and bench press with 60% of 1RM. Pain perception was evaluated following the repetitions to failure tests. The study was registered at ISRCTN (registration number: ISRCTN11694009). RESULTS: Compared to the placebo condition, isolated caffeine ingestion and co-ingestion of caffeine and CitMal significantly enhanced strength in 1RM bench press (Cohen's d: 0.05-0.06; 2.5-2.7%), muscular endurance in the squat (d: 0.46-0.58; 18.6-18.7%) and bench press (d: 0.48-0.64; 9.3-9.5%). However, there was no significant difference between isolated caffeine ingestion and caffeine co-ingested with CitMal, and isolated CitMal supplementation did not have an ergogenic effect in any outcome. No main effect of condition was found in the analysis for CMJ-derived variables, 1RM squat and pain perception. CONCLUSION: Caffeine ingestion appears to be ergogenic for muscular strength and muscular endurance, while adding CitMal does not seem to further enhance these effects. © 2023. The Author(s).

10
CLINICAL STUDY Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37242187 ↗
The Effect of Acute Pre-Workout Supplement Ingestion on Basketball-Specific Performance of Well-Trained Athletes.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 15 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Thus, although players' alactic and lactic anaerobic performance could be improved, peak power, sprinting and aerobic performance are not.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

A pre-workout supplement's (PWS; 200 mg caffeine, 3.3 g creatine monohydrate, 3.2 g β-alanine, 6 g citrulline malate and 5 g branched chained amino acid (BCAA) per dose) acute effects on the alactic (jumping, sprinting, agility), lactic (Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test, RAST) and aerobic performance (Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1, Yo-Yo IRL1 VO2max) of well-trained basketball players was investigated in this double-blind placebo-controlled study. Thirty players (age 18-31 years, height 166-195 cm, weight 70.2-116.7 kg, body fat 10.6-26.4%) were allocated to pre-workout (PWS, n = 15) or placebo (PL, n = 15) groups. Half of the participants in each group performed the evaluations without PWS or PL, while the rest consumed PWS or PL 30 min before the assessments (1st trial) and vice versa (2nd trial). Significant improvements in counter-movement jump (CMJ) (PWS: 4.3 ± 2.1%; PL: 1.2 ± 1.0%), agility (PWS: -2.9 ± 1.8%; PL: 1.8 ± 1.7%), RAST average (PWS: 18.3 ± 9.1%; PL: -2.2 ± 2.0%), minimum power (PWS: 13.7 ± 8.9%; PL: -7.5 ± 5.9%), and fatigue index (PWS: -25.0 ± 0.9%; PL: -4.6 ± 0.6%) were observed in the PWS group vs. the PL group (p < 0.05). No differences were found regarding sprinting, aerobic performance, and blood lactate concentrations. Thus, although players' alactic and lactic anaerobic performance could be improved, peak power, sprinting and aerobic performance are not.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category