NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Creatine Monohydrate

AMINO ACIDS · Evidence Monograph

Creatine Monohydrate is an evidence-graded amino acids monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (6 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 4,706 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 6 Meta · 5 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 4 RCTs (9 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 4,706
Reported Trial Dosages 20 g/day · 0.3 g · 10 g
Trial Duration Range 1 weeks · 12 weeks · 5 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (20 g/day · 0.3 g · 10 g) over a structured 1 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer
Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime
Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
kidney (PubMed clinical endpoint)
memory (PubMed clinical endpoint)
muscle (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Creatine Monohydrate & Why Does Form Matter?

Creatine Monohydrate is classified under AMINO ACIDS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (20 g/day, 0.3 g, 10 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Creatine Monohydrate frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (4 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Creatine Monohydrate acts on pathways governing neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Creatine Monohydrate an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 6 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials (9 double-blind, n = 4,706 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41199218 (2025) — "Effect of creatine supplementation on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (No significant changes were observed in GFR, suggesting preserved kidney function.) • PMID:36877404 (2023) — "Effects of Creatine Monohydrate on Endurance Performance in a Trained Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: Creatine monohydrate supplementation was shown to be ineffective on endurance performance in a trained population.) • PMID:36593466 (2023) — "An investigation into the relationship between nutritional status, dietary intake, symptoms and health-related quality of life in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (Improvement in JIA symptoms were observed in one case, one pilot and one exploratory study with overall 9 JIA patients after receiving Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) which contains protein and what is required for a complete nutrition, A clinical trial study found Kre-Celazine)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 359843060.88 (0.04–0.53)PMID 352185520.95-0.14Null (0)1.1Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer. Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 20 g/day · 0.3 g · 10 g · 250 μg over 1 weeks · 12 weeks · 5 days · 24 weeks. Optimal timing window: AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime (Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Creatine Monohydrate, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (20 g/day · 0.3 g · 10 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 1 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 20 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS BMC nephrology (2025) PMID: 41199218 ↗
Effect of creatine supplementation on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in BMC nephrology involving n = 177 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03 (MD 0.07). Key conclusion: No significant changes were observed in GFR, suggesting preserved kidney function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Creatine monohydrate is a widely used dietary supplement with proven benefits in athletic performance and potential therapeutic applications in clinical populations. However, concerns regarding its impact on renal function persist, largely due to elevated serum creatinine levels associated with creatine intake. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2000 and March 2025. Primary outcomes were serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, with subgroup analysis by supplementation duration. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review, and 12 studies (177 participants in the creatine group and 263 in control) were eligible for meta-analysis of serum creatinine levels. Creatine supplementation was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in serum creatinine (MD: 0.07 µmol/L; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.12; p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis of the creatinine outcome based on follow-up duration revealed that the intervention effect was significant in studies with a follow-up of ≤ 1 week (MD = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.21). However, no significant effect was observed in studies with a follow-up of 1 to 12 weeks (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: - 0.09 to 0.17). The effect became significant again in studies with a follow-up of more than 12 weeks. The meta-analysis revealed a non-statistically significant differences in GFR following creatine supplementation compared to control. CONCLUSION: Creatine supplementation is associated with a modest, transient increase in serum creatinine levels, likely due to metabolic turnover rather than renal impairment. No significant changes were observed in GFR, suggesting preserved kidney function. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. © 2025. The Author(s).

02
META-ANALYSIS Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) (2023) PMID: 36877404 ↗
Effects of Creatine Monohydrate on Endurance Performance in a Trained Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.); statistical significance reported at p = 0.47. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Creatine monohydrate supplementation was shown to be ineffective on endurance performance in a trained population.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: There is robust evidence that creatine monohydrate supplementation can enhance short-term high-intensity exercise in athletes. However, the effect of creatine monohydrate supplementation on aerobic performance and its role during aerobic activities is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the supplementation effects of creatine monohydrate on endurance performance in a trained population. METHODS: The search strategy in this systematic review and meta-analysis was designed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were explored from inception until 19 May, 2022. Only human experimental trials, controlled with a placebo group, evaluating the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation on endurance performance in a trained population were analyzed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies satisfied all the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results for the pooled meta-analysis showed a non-significant change in endurance performance after creatine monohydrate supplementation in a trained population (p = 0.47), with a trivial negative effect (pooled standardized mean difference = - 0.07 [95% confidence interval - 0.32 to 0.18]; I2 = 34.75%). Further, after excluding the studies not evenly distributed around the base of the funnel plot, the results were similar (pooled standardized mean difference = - 0.07 [95% confidence interval - 0.27 to 0.13]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Creatine monohydrate supplementation was shown to be ineffective on endurance performance in a trained population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) with the following registration number: CRD42022327368. © 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

03
META-ANALYSIS BMC pediatrics (2023) PMID: 36593466 ↗
An investigation into the relationship between nutritional status, dietary intake, symptoms and health-related quality of life in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in BMC pediatrics involving n = 1,621 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: Improvement in JIA symptoms were observed in one case, one pilot and one exploratory study with overall 9 JIA patients after receiving Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) which contains protein and what is required for a complete nutrition, A clinical trial study found Kre-Celazine
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The association between diet, symptoms and health related quality of life in children and young people with Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is not clearly understood. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to explore the evidence for a relationship between nutritional status, dietary intake, arthritis symptoms, disease activity and health-related quality of life in children and young people with JIA considering both observational and interventional studies separately. METHOD: The databases PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched in October 2019, updated in September 2020 and October 2021. Searches were restricted to English language, human and age (2-18 years old). Studies were included if they measured the effect of dietary supplements, vitamins or minerals, or diet in general, on quality of life and/ or arthritis symptom management. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts. Full texts were sourced for relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were used for extracting data. For variables (vitamin D and disease activity), a random-effects meta-analysis model was performed. Two authors using a standardized data extraction form, extracted data independently. RESULTS: 11,793 papers were identified through database searching, 26 studies met our inclusion criteria with 1621 participants. Overall studies quality were fair to good. Results from controlled trial and case control studies with total 146 JIA patients, found that Ɯ-3 PUFA improved the mean active joint count (p < 0.001), Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27) (p < 0.001) and immune system (≤ 0.05). Furthermore, n-3 and n-6 PUFAs have a negative correlation with CRP (C-reactive protein) and ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) (p < 0.05). Improvement in JIA symptoms were observed in one case, one pilot and one exploratory study with overall 9 JIA patients after receiving Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) which contains protein and what is required for a complete nutrition, A clinical trial study found Kre-Celazine nutrition (composed of a proprietary alkali buffered, creatine monohydrate and fatty acids mixture)

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition reviews (2023) PMID: 35984306 ↗
Effects of creatine supplementation on memory in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition reviews; statistical significance reported at p = 0.02 (SMD 0.88). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Creatine supplementation enhanced measures of memory performance in healthy individuals, especially in older adults (66-76 years).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Comment in Nutr Rev. 2023 Oct 10;81(11):1495-1496. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac108. CONTEXT: From an energy perspective, the brain is very metabolically demanding. It is well documented that creatine plays a key role in brain bioenergetics. There is some evidence that creatine supplementation can augment brain creatine stores, which could increase memory. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effects of creatine supplementation on memory performance in healthy humans. DATA SOURCES: The literature was searched through the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases from inception until September 2021. DATA EXTRACTION: Twenty-three eligible RCTs were initially identified. Ten RCTs examining the effect of creatine supplementation compared with placebo on measures of memory in healthy individuals met the inclusion criteria for systematic review, 8 of which were included in the meta-analysis. DATA ANALYSIS: Overall, creatine supplementation improved measures of memory compared with placebo (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.29, 95%CI, 0.04-0.53; I2 = 66%; P = 0.02). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant improvement in memory in older adults (66-76 years) (SMD = 0.88; 95%CI, 0.22-1.55; I2 = 83%; P = 0.009) compared with their younger counterparts (11-31 years) (SMD = 0.03; 95%CI, -0.14 to 0.20; I2 = 0%; P = 0.72). Creatine dose (≈ 2.2-20 g/d), duration of intervention (5 days to 24 weeks), sex, or geographical origin did not influence the findings. CONCLUSION: Creatine supplementation enhanced measures of memory performance in healthy individuals, especially in older adults (66-76 years). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. 42021281027. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute.

05
META-ANALYSIS Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) (2022) PMID: 35218552 ↗
The Paradoxical Effect of Creatine Monohydrate on Muscle Damage Markers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) involving n = 240 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03 (SMD 0.95). Key conclusion: Although not significant, a large difference in indirect muscle damage markers was also found at 48 h post-exercise (SMD 1.24) for the chronic training response.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Several studies have examined the effect of creatine monohydrate (CrM) on indirect muscle damage markers and muscle performance, although pooled data from several studies indicate that the benefits of CrM on recovery dynamics are limited. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis determined whether the ergogenic effects of CrM ameliorated markers of muscle damage and performance following muscle-damaging exercises. METHODS: In total, 23 studies were included, consisting of 240 participants in the CrM group (age 23.9 ± 10.4 years, height 178 ± 5 cm, body mass 76.9 ± 7.6 kg, females 10.4%) and 229 participants in the placebo group (age 23.7 ± 8.5 years, height 177 ± 5 cm, body mass 77.0 ± 6.6 kg, females 10.0%). These studies were rated as fair to excellent following the PEDro scale. The outcome measures were compared between the CrM and placebo groups at 24-36 h and 48-90 h following muscle-damaging exercises, using standardised mean differences (SMDs) and associated p-values via forest plots. Furthermore, sub-group analyses were conducted by separating studies into those that examined the effects of CrM as an acute training response (i.e., after one muscle-damaging exercise bout) and those that examined the chronic training response (i.e., examining the acute response after the last training session following several weeks of training). RESULTS: According to the meta-analysis, the CrM group exhibited significantly lower indirect muscle damage markers (i.e., creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and/or myoglobin) at 48-90 h post-exercise for the acute training response (SMD - 1.09; p = 0.03). However, indirect muscle damage markers were significantly greater in the CrM group at 24 h post-exercise (SMD 0.95; p = 0.04) for the chronic training response. Although not significant, a large difference in indirect muscle damage markers was also found at 48 h post-exercise (SMD 1.24) for the chronic training response. The CrM group also showed lower inflammation for the acute training response at 24-36 h post-exercise and 48-90 h post-exercise with a large effect size (SMD - 1.38 ≤ d ≤ - 1.79). Similarly, the oxidative stress markers were lower fo

06
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2020) PMID: 32549301 ↗
Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Females Taking Oral Creatine Monohydrate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 951 participants (RR 1.09). Key conclusion: Nor does the use of creatine supplementation increase the risk of total adverse outcomes, weight gain or renal and hepatic complications in females.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Creatine Monohydrate (CrM) is a dietary supplement routinely used as an ergogenic aid for sport and training, and as a potential therapeutic aid to augment different disease processes. Despite its increased use in recent years, studies reporting potential adverse outcomes of CrM have been mostly derived from male or mixed sex populations. A systematic search was conducted, which included female participants on CrM, where adverse outcomes were reported, with meta-analysis performed where appropriate. Six hundred and fifty-six studies were identified where creatine supplementation was the primary intervention; fifty-eight were female only studies (9%). Twenty-nine studies monitored for adverse outcomes, with 951 participants. There were no deaths or serious adverse outcomes reported. There were no significant differences in total adverse events, (risk ratio (RR) 1.24 (95% CI 0.51, 2.98)), gastrointestinal events, (RR 1.09 (95% CI 0.53, 2.24)), or weight gain, (mean difference (MD) 1.24 kg pre-intervention, (95% CI -0.34, 2.82)) to 1.37 kg post-intervention (95% CI -0.50, 3.23)), in CrM supplemented females, when stratified by dosing regimen and subject to meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference was reported in measures of renal or hepatic function. In conclusion, mortality and serious adverse events are not associated with CrM supplementation in females. Nor does the use of creatine supplementation increase the risk of total adverse outcomes, weight gain or renal and hepatic complications in females. However, all future studies of creatine supplementation in females should consider surveillance and comprehensive reporting of adverse outcomes to better inform participants and health professionals involved in future trials.

07
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Molecular genetics and metabolism (2014) PMID: 24953403 ↗
Treatment of X-linked creatine transporter (SLC6A8) deficiency: systematic review of the literature and three new cases.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2014 Systematic Review published in Molecular genetics and metabolism involving n = 25 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the limitations of this systematic review, we conclude that a proportion of CTD patients show amenability to treatment-particularly milder cases with residual brain creatine, and therefore probable residual protein f
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Creatine transporter deficiency (CTD) is an X-linked inborn error of creatine metabolism characterized by reduced intra-cerebral creatine, developmental delay/intellectual disability, (ID), behavioral disturbance, seizures, and hypotonia in individuals harboring mutations in the SLC6A8 gene. Treatment for CTD includes supplementation with creatine, either alone or in combination with creatine precursors (arginine or glycine). Unlike other disorders of creatine metabolism, the efficacy of its treatment remains controversial. METHODS: We present our systematic literature review (2001-2013) comprising 7 publications (case series/reports), collectively describing 25 patients who met the inclusion criteria, and 3 additional cases treated at our institution. Definitions were established and extracted data analyzed for cognitive ability, psychiatric and behavioral disturbances, epilepsy, and cerebral proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements at pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: Treatment regimens varied among the 28 cases: 2 patients received creatine-monohydrate supplementation; 7 patients received L-arginine; 2 patients received creatine-monohydrate and L-arginine; and 17 patients received a combination of creatine-monohydrate, L-arginine and glycine. Median treatment duration was 34.6 months (range 3 months-5 years). Level of evidence was IV. A total of 10 patients (36%) demonstrated response to treatment, manifested by either an increase in cerebral creatine, or improved clinical parameters. Seven of the 28 patients had quantified pre- and post-treatment creatine, and it was significantly increased post-treatment. All of the patients with increased cerebral creatine also experienced clinical improvement. In addition, the majority of patients with clinical improvement had detectable cerebral creatine prior to treatment. 90% of the patients who improved were initiated on treatment before nine years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the limitations of this systematic review, we conclude that a proportion of CTD patients show amenability to treatment-particularly milder cases with residual brain creatine, and therefore probable residual protein f

08
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2012) PMID: 22513923 ↗
Treatment for mitochondrial disorders.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2012 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 30 participants. Key conclusion: Current treatment is largely supportive and the disorders progress relentlessly causing significant morbidity and premature death.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial respiratory chain disorders are the most prevalent group of inherited neurometabolic diseases. They present with central and peripheral neurological features usually in association with other organ involvement including the eye, the heart, the liver, and kidneys, diabetes mellitus and sensorineural deafness. Current treatment is largely supportive and the disorders progress relentlessly causing significant morbidity and premature death. Vitamin supplements, pharmacological agents and exercise therapy have been used in isolated cases and small clinical trials, but the efficacy of these interventions is unclear. The first review was carried out in 2003, and identified six clinical trials. This major update was carried out to identify new studies and grade the original studies for potential bias in accordance with revised Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is objective evidence to support the use of current treatments for mitochondrial disease. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (4 July 2011), CENTRAL (2011, Issue 2, MEDLINE (1966 to July 2011), and EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2011), and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (including cross-over studies). Two of the authors independently selected abstracts for further detailed review. Further review was performed independently by all five authors to decide which trials fit the inclusion criteria and graded risk of bias. Participants included males and females of any age with a confirmed diagnosis of mitochondrial disease based upon muscle histochemistry, respiratory chain complex analysis of tissues or cell lines or DNA studies. Interventions included any pharmacological agent, dietary modification, nutritional supplement, exercise therapy or other treatment. The review authors excluded studies at high risk of bias in any category. The primary outcome measures included an change in muscle strength and/or endurance, or neurological clinical features. Secondary outcome measures included quality of life assessments, biochemical markers of disea

09
CLINICAL STUDY Nutrients (2026) PMID: 42075005 ↗
Single-Dose Creatine Reduces Sleep Deprivation-Induced Deterioration in Cognitive Performance.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Clinical Study published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Although the effect is less pronounced than with a high dose of 0.35 g/kg, there is still an improvement of up to 12%.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background/Objectives: Creatine is a supplement that, beyond its physiological effects, has been shown to have positive effects on cognitive abilities. In our previous study, we showed that a single dose of 0.35 g/kg creatine induces changes in brain metabolism during sleep deprivation and reduces deterioration in cognitive performance. The present study investigates whether supplementation of a lower dose is associated with cognitive effects during sleep deprivation, focusing exclusively on cognitive performance outcomes. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy subjects performed cognitive tests at the evening baseline and 3, 5.5, and 7.5 h after receiving a single dose of creatine monohydrate (0.2 g/kg) or a placebo during a total of 21 h of sleep deprivation (SD). Results: The results show a mitigating effect of creatine on sleep deprivation-induced deterioration in logical and numerical tasks, language-related processing speed, and the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT). Compared to males, females benefit more in logic, PVT and processing speed in language and logic tasks. Conclusions: Our results show that a dose of 0.2 g/kg creatine is associated with a reduced deterioration in cognitive performance during sleep deprivation. Although the effect is less pronounced than with a high dose of 0.35 g/kg, there is still an improvement of up to 12%.

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (2025) PMID: 41579075 ↗
Short-term creatine supplementation enhances strength, reduces fatigue, and accelerates recovery in resistance-trained athletes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.017. Key conclusion: Peak HR increased with intensity for both conditions (d = 1.1-4.28), with CrM showing lower HR at 60% (p = 0.017, d = 1.05) and higher HR at 80% (p = 0.047, d = 0.82) compared to PLA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: While the long-term ergogenic benefits of creatine monohydrate (CrM) supplementation are well-documented, the potential advantages of acute ingestion followed by short-term consumption remain relatively underexplored. This double-blind, randomized crossover study investigated the acute and short-term effects of CrM supplementation on strength performance, heart rate variability (HRV) responses, and recovery of lower limbs strength and muscle soreness in resistance-trained males. METHODS: A total of eleven physically active participants were recruited; however, due to incomplete data, one participant was excluded, and ten participants (age: 21.3 ± 1.9 years) were analyzed. Participants ingested either creatine monohydrate (CrM: 0.3 g·kg-1·d-1) or a placebo (PLA) for three days, with the first day's dose consumed 2 h pre-test and subsequent doses divided into three daily doses. Participants completed two test sessions in a randomized order, separated by a seven-day washout period. Each session included bench press (BP) and back squat (BS) tests performed at 60%, 70%, and 80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) under either CrM or PLA conditions. Strength performances (repetitions, velocity, power), HRV and peak heart rate (HR), jump tests (Countermovement Jump (CMJ) and Squat Jump (SJ)), and delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were assessed. RESULTS: Compared to PLA, CrM supplementation significantly increased repetitions completed at 60-80% 1RM in BP and BS (p ≤ 0.041, d = 0.72-1.6) during both test sessions. CrM reported higher velocity compared to PLA at all intensities (60-80% 1RM) for both exercises and sessions (p ≤ 0.035, d = 0.78-4.09). CrM reduced cardiovascular strain compared to PLA at 60% 1RM during back squat (p = 0.017, d = 1.05). Peak HR increased with intensity for both conditions (d = 1.1-4.28), with CrM showing lower HR at 60% (p = 0.017, d = 1.05) and higher HR at 80% (p = 0.047, d = 0.82) compared to PLA. CrM enhanced post-exercise parasympathetic reactivation in the 1st session demonstrating higher favorable response in RMSSD (p = 0.015, d = 2.99) and HF power (p = 0.022, d = 2.76) compared to PLA. CMJ performance was higher in CrM co

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category