D-Chiro-Inositol

This study was aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of inositol nutritional supplementation during pregnancy for the prevention of GDM. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trails (RCTs) in this field until May 2022. Primary outcomes were the incidence for GDM and plasma glucose levels by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Pooled results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Seven RCTs with 1321 participants were included in this study. Compared with the control group, 4 g myo-inositol (MI) supplementation per day significantly decreased the incidence of GDM (RR = 0.30, 95% CI (0.18, 0.49), p < 0.00001). It significantly decreased the plasma glucose levels of OGTT regarding fasting-glucose OGTT (MD = −4.20, 95% CI (−5.87, −2.54), p < 0.00001), 1-h OGTT (MD = −8.75, 95% CI (−12.42, −5.08), p < 0.00001), and 2-h OGTT (MD = −8.59, 95% CI (−11.81, −5.83), p < 0.00001). It also decreased the need of insulin treatment, and reduced the incidence of preterm delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia. However, no difference was observed between 1.1 g MI per day plus 27.6 mg D-chiro-inositol (DCI) per day and the control group regarding all evaluated results. In conclusion, 4 g MI nutritional supplementation per day during early pregnancy may reduce GDM incidence and severity, therefore may be a practical and safe approach for the prevention of GDM.

PURPOSE: Inositol (ISL) embraces a family of simple carbohydrates with insulin-sensitizing properties, whose most common isoforms are Myo-inositol (MYO) and D-chiro inositol (DCI). The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ISL supplementation during pregnancy for the prevention of gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in electronic databases until October 2017. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pregnant women with GDM who were randomized to either ISL (i.e., intervention group) or either placebo or no treatment (i.e., control group). The primary outcome was the preventive effect on GDM, defined as the rate of GDM in women without a prior diagnosis of GDM. Pooled results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Five RCTs were included (including 965 participants). ISL supplementation was associated with lower rate of GDM (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-1.03, p = 0.01) and lower preterm delivery rate (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.74, p = 0.006). No adverse effects were reported. Adjusting for the type of intervention (MYO 2 g twice daily vs MYO 1100 mg plus DCI 27.6 mg daily), a significant effect was found only in patients receiving 2 g MYO twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: ISLs administration during pregnancy appears to be safe and may represent a novel strategy for GDM prevention. In particular, the double administration of MYO 2 g per day may improve the glycemic homeostasis and may reduce GDM rate and preterm delivery rate.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether oral myo-inositol supplementation (MI) is able to reduce the amount of gonadotropins (GA) and the length of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (SL) in both Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017069439) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched articles published in English between January 1985 to August 2017, using the combination of the Medical Subject Headings "Inositol" with "Ovulation Induction", "follicle-stimulating hormone, human, with HCG C-terminal peptide", "Reproductive Techniques, Assisted", and "Fertilization in Vitro". We collected data about GA and SL comparing MI to no treatment or D-Chiro-Inositol (DCI) supplementation (controls). A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate selected outcomes in PCOS and non-PCOS women. RESULTS: We included 8 studies embedding 812 participants. We found a reduction in GA (p < 0.00001) and SL (p = 0.0007) in patients receiving MI with respect to controls. MI was effective in both PCOS (p < 0.00001) and non-PCOS women (p = 0.02) in reducing GA; conversely, MI supplementation decreased the SL only in PCOS women (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: During IVF, MI is effective in both PCOS and non-PCOS women in saving gonadotropins, but reduces efficiently SL only in PCOS women.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex and heterogeneous disease that involves menstrual dysfunction and reproductive difficulty, as well as metabolic problems. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of myo-inositol (MYO) and d-chiro-inositol (DCI) on improving oocyte or embryo quality and pregnancy rates for women with PCOS undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We searched the Web of Knowledge, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane databases for all articles published in any language up to March 2017. The selection criteria were as follows: (population) patients with PCOS; (intervention) treatment with inositol (MYO, DCI, or both, with any dose and any duration) in conjunction with an ovulation-inducing agent versus the ovulation-inducing agent alone; (outcome) oocyte and embryo quality; (study design) randomized controlled trials. Of 76 identified studies, eight RCTs were included for analysis comprising 1019 women with PCOS. MYO supplementation was insufficient to improve oocyte quality (OR 2.2051; 95% CI 0.8260 to 5.8868), embryo quality (OR 1.6231, 95% CI 0.3926 to 6.7097), or pregnancy rate (OR 1.2832, 95% CI 0.8692 to 1.8944). Future studies of appropriate dose, size and duration of DCI are vital to clarify its the role in the management of PCOS.

BACKGROUND: A couple may be considered to have fertility problems if they have been trying to conceive for over a year with no success. This may affect up to a quarter of all couples planning a child. It is estimated that for 40% to 50% of couples, subfertility may result from factors affecting women. Antioxidants are thought to reduce the oxidative stress brought on by these conditions. Currently, limited evidence suggests that antioxidants improve fertility, and trials have explored this area with varied results. This review assesses the evidence for the effectiveness of different antioxidants in female subfertility. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether supplementary oral antioxidants compared with placebo, no treatment/standard treatment or another antioxidant improve fertility outcomes for subfertile women. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases (from their inception to September 2016) with no language or date restriction: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Studies (CENTRAL CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED. We checked reference lists of appropriate studies and searched for ongoing trials in the clinical trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any type, dose or combination of oral antioxidant supplement with placebo, no treatment or treatment with another antioxidant, among women attending a reproductive clinic. We excluded trials comparing antioxidants with fertility drugs alone and trials that only included fertile women attending a fertility clinic because of male partner infertility. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected eligible studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The primary review outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rates and adverse events. We pooled studies using a fixed-effect model, and calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the dichotomous outcomes of live birth, clinical pregnancy and adverse events. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence by a

The incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), type II diabetes (T2D) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) has been progressively increasing. Insulin resistance (InsR) seems to play a key role in a majority of phenotypes of these conditions, altering metabolic homeostasis, within muscle, liver, adipose and other tissues. Hyperinsulinemia is often associated with InsR and causes hormonal imbalances especially within ovaries and adrenals. Inositol is a polyalcohol, naturally occurring as nine stereoisomers, including D-chiro-inositol (DCI) and myo-inositol (MI), which have prominent roles in the metabolism of glucose and free fatty acids. MI and DCI have been classified as insulin-sensitizers and seem to adequately counteract several InsR-related metabolic alterations with a safe nutraceutical profile. Based on our analysis of selected studies that investigated MI and/or DCI, we conclude that supplementation with MI and/or DCI complement each other in their metabolic actions and act in synergy with other insulin sensitizing drugs and/or nutraceuticals. Nevertheless, considering the possible severe bias due to different methodologies across published studies, we conclude that there is a need for further studies on larger cohorts and with greater statistical power. These should further clarify outcomes and suitable therapeutic dosages of MI and DCI, possibly based on each patient's clinical status.

OBJECTIVES: Asprosin, a novel adipokine primarily secreted by white adipose tissue, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction. Its elevated levels characterize patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) exhibiting metabolic alterations. Aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of insulin sensitizer administration, as inositols, on asprosin levels and then compare these results with the effects of metformin treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients with PCOS were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into two groups: (i) group 1 assumed a dietary supplement based on 40:1 myo-inositol (MI)/D-chiro-inositol (DCI), (ii) group 2 assumed metformin (MET), for 12-16 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The reduction of serum asprosin levels in patients with PCOS after treatment with MET and MI/DCI is the most intriguing result. Its levels decreased more in the inositol group, although they did not reach statistical significance probably due to the lower number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The observed dysregulation of asprosin levels in PCOS highlights a potential link between this novel adipokine and the pathophysiology of the disorder, suggesting a modulatory effect of the combined 40:1 MI/DCI on asprosin levels. Of course, further studies may contribute to disclosing molecular mechanisms underlying asprosin reduction and open toward new perspectives.

This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of Myo-inositol (MI) and D-chiro-inositol (DCI) with metformin in enhancing ovarian function, promoting ovulation, and reducing perceived stress in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Women with PCOS were identified using the Androgen Excess Society's criteria, and 60 participants were enrolled and divided equally into two groups. One group received a 40:1 ratio of MI plus DCI, while the other received metformin for a 12-week period. Endocrine and metabolic parameters, insulin-resistance, stress levels, and quality of life were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Both MI plus DCI and metformin significantly improved insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR, p < 0.001), SHBG levels (p = 0.021), ovarian volume (p < 0.001), and menstrual regularity (p = 0.002), along with BMI, quality of life, and PSS scores (p < 0.001). Metformin showed slightly better outcomes in certain parameters, such as insulin sensitivity and endocrine markers, probably due to a higher representation of Phenotype A. In contrast, we hypothesize that MI plus DCI may be more effective for Phenotypes C and D. Our findings support both MI plus DCI and metformin as effective treatments for PCOS, with each treatment offering specific benefits. These results highlight the potential for a phenotype-specific tailored therapeutic approach to better manage the complex metabolic, endocrine, and stress-related challenges of PCOS. Trial Registration: clinicalTrial.gov NCT05767515. Registered 3 February, 2023. © 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with cardiovascular risk factors, such as insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and abdominal obesity. Given the growing need to investigate food supplements with positive health effects, this study was aimed at testing the benefits of a specific supplement for people with MetS. Fifty-eight subjects with MetS and T2DM or impaired glucose tolerance assuming metformin, were randomly assigned to take a food supplement of glucomannan, D-chiro-inositol, Cinnamomum zeylanicum blume and inulin at a daily fixed dose of 4 g orally for four months. Body weight, waist circumference, plasma lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and triglyc-erides), plasma glycaemic profile and visceral adiposity index (VAI) were measured at baseline and after four months of supplementation. After 16 weeks, in subjects with T2DM or insulin resistance who took the supplement (+ metformin), there was a significant reduction in body weight and BMI (p < 0.0001), serum insulin (p < 0.05) and the HOMA index (p < 0.01), as well as in the lipaemic pattern, with a significant improvement in total serum cholesterol (p < 0.005), triglycerides (p < 0.03) and LDL (p < 0.02). Our study shows that the food supplement tested is a valid and safe alternative therapeutic approach in the management of MetS and all its resulting risk factors, as its efficacy has been demonstrated across anthropometric, glucose, lipid and hepatic parameters.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia plays an important role in pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Metformin, Myoinositol and d-chiro-inositol acts as insulin sensitizers and exerts a beneficial effects in PCOS. The objective is to compare the effect of metformin monotherapy versus a combination of metformin with Myoinositol and d-chiro-inositol in PCOS. DESIGN: This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted over a period of 6 months. All overweight and obese women with PCOS with the age group between 18 and 35 were included and randomized into two groups, 27 in the metformin monotherapy arm and 26 in the myoinositol combination arm. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: The variables assessed were duration of menstrual cycle, anthropometric parameters, modified Ferriman Gallwey score, global acne score, Fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting lipid profile, serum testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, anti-Mullerian hormone, and pelvic ultrasound to assess ovarian volume, PCOS Questionnaire score. Changes in the parameters from baseline at the end of 6 months of treatment were assessed and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Menstrual cycle regularity improved in both groups with significantly greater improvement in the group receiving myoinositol-based therapy (p < .001). Pregnancy rate was equal in both the arms. There was a significant improvement in PCOSQ score in myoinositol-based therapy group (p < .001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in other hormonal, metabolic parameters between two groups in spite of symptomatic benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of myoinositol to metformin exerts additional benefits in improving menstrual cycle regularity, and quality of life in women with PCOS. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of myo-inositol and d-chiro-inositol in combination (MI + DCI) with combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) on menstrual cycle regulation in young Indian women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Seventy young women with PCOS aged 15-24 years with delayed cycles were randomized into two groups and were treated for 6 months with MI + DCI (550 + 150 mg, 3.6:1 ratio) twice a day and CHC (ethinyl estradiol 20 µg + drospirenone 3 mg) once a day. RESULTS: Spontaneous menses resumed in 28 (84.85%) young women on MI + DCI, compared with withdrawal bleeding in 34 (100%) on CHC. The mean cycle length reduced with both MI + DCI (124.54 ± 8.08 to 57.75 ± 3.00 days, P < 0.001) and CHC (105.88 ± 7.96 to 30.53 ± 2.95 days, P < 0.001). Regular menstrual cycles were established in 9 (27.27%) young women with MI + DCI (P = 0.001) and 30 (88.23%) with CHC (P < 0.001). Three months after stopping the treatment, 24 young women (85.71%) on MI + DCI and 25 (73.53%) on CHC continued to have spontaneous cycles. Anti-Müllerian hormone decreased with both the drugs (P = 0.001), whereas luteinizing hormone (P = 0.001) and testosterone (P = 0.04) decreased with CHC and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (P < 0.001) with MI + DCI. CONCLUSION: Myo-inositol and d-chiro-inositol in combination (3.6:1 ratio) are effective in regularizing menstrual cycles and improving insulin resistance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2018/03/012643). http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=20969&EncHid=&userName=myo-inositol. © 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Background: D-chiro-inositol (DCI) and glucose transporter inhibitors may inhibit myo-inositol (MI) transporters, and the aim is to clinically evaluate their effect on MI absorption. Research design and methods: Fasting 18 healthy volunteers received orally 6000 mg MI, 6000 mg MI with 1000 mg DCI, and 6000 mg MI with SelectSIEVE® Apple PCQ and Sorbitol, Maltodextrin and Sucralose (PCQ-SMS), in three different phases with a washout period of 7 days. At each phase, blood samples were collected before administration, and every 60 minutes until 540 minutes after administration. MI plasma levels (μmol/L) were quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach it (Tmax), and the area under the time-concentration curve of MI (AUC 0-540) were evaluated. Results: The Cmax of MI alone (Tmax = 180min) was 1.29-fold higher than those of MI with DCI (Tmax = 180min) (p < 0.001) and 1.69-fold higher than those of MI with PCQ-SMS (Tmax = 240min) (p < 0.001). The AUC 0-540 was reduced by 19.09% in MI plus DCI (p = 0.0118) and by 31.8% in MI plus PCQ-SMS (p < 0.001) as compared to MI alone. Conclusions: DCI, glucose transporter inhibitors and sugars, such as sorbitol and maltodextrin, seem to inhibit MI absorption, decreasing MI plasma concentration as compared to MI alone.

Erratum in Biochemistry. 2005 Nov 22;44(46):15422. Insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle proceeds predominantly through a nonoxidative pathway with glycogen synthase as a rate-limiting enzyme, yet the mechanisms for insulin activation of glycogen synthase are not understood despite years of investigation. Isolation of putative insulin second messengers from beef liver yielded a pseudo-disaccharide consisting of pinitol (3-O-methyl-d-chiro-inositol) beta-1,4 linked to galactosamine chelated with Mn(2+) (called INS2). Here we show that chemically synthesized INS2 has biological activity that significantly enhances insulin reduction of hyperglycemia in streptozotocin diabetic rats. We used computer modeling to dock INS2 onto the known three-dimensional crystal structure of protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C). Modeling and FlexX/CScore energy minimization predicted a unique favorable site on PP2C for INS2 in a surface cleft adjacent to the catalytic center. Binding of INS2 is predicted to involve formation of multiple H-bonds, including one with residue Asp163. Wild-type PP2C activity assayed with a phosphopeptide substrate was potently stimulated in a dose-dependent manner by INS2. In contrast, the D163A mutant of PP2C was not activated by INS2. The D163A mutant and wild-type PP2C in the absence of INS2 had the same Mn(2+)-dependent phosphatase activity with p-nitrophenyl phosphate as a substrate, showing that this mutation did not disrupt the catalytic site. We propose that INS2 allosterically activates PP2C, fulfilling the role of a putative mediator mimetic of insulin signaling to promote protein dephosphorylation and metabolic responses.

D-chiro-Inositol (DCI) enhances reproductive function in insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovarian disease and enhances the effects of insulin in the periphery, suggesting that this compound may act in part by sensitizing the hypothalamus to effects of insulin. Effects of gold-thioglucose (GTG) to produce hypothalamic lesions and subsequent obesity are insulin-dependent, suggesting that responses to GTG may be a marker of hypothalamic sensitivity to insulin. To assess these hypotheses, the present study assessed if DCI would enhance the ability of a subthreshhold dose of GTG to produce hypothalamic lesions and subsequent obesity. At the subthreshhold dose used (0.4 mg/kg i.p.), injection of GTG produced no subsequent effect on body weight compared to saline; similarly, at the dose of DCI used (10 mg/kg/day in drinking water), DCI produced no effect on body weight. In contrast, when given to mice exposed to DCI, this dose of GTG produced significant increase in body weight and evidence of an enhanced medial arcuate hypothalamic lesion. Exploring strengths and limits of urinary D-chiro inositol phosphoglycans (IPG-P) as a screening test for preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scioscia M(1), Noventa M(2), Cavallin F(3), Straface G(2), Pontrelli G(2), Fattizzi N(2), Libera M(2), Rademacher TW(4), Robillard PY(5). Author information: (1)Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy. Electronic address: [email protected]. (2)Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico Hospital, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy. (3)Independent Statistician, Solagna, Vicenza, Italy. (4)Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom. (5)Service de Réanimation Néonatale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sud-Réunion, Saint-Pierre, France. Preeclampsia is a severe complication of human pregnancy as it leads to significant maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. A prompt recognition of women that develop this syndrome can improve clinical management, increase surveillance and, finally, improve outco

OBJECTIVES: This umbrella review aimed to synthesize and appraise the evidence regarding the efficacy of inositol for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) by integrating meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials(RCTs), thereby assessing the robustness of the existing body of evidence. METHODS: We searched four databases from inception to August 2025 for relevant RCT meta-analyses. Primary outcomes included hormonal profiles, glycolipid metabolism, anthropometrics, and reproductive outcomes. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2 and GRADE. RESULTS: Thirteen meta-analyses were included. AMSTAR-2 ratings were 23.1% high, 53.8% low, and 23.1% very low quality. GRADE assessment of 85 evidence items revealed no high-quality evidence; 18.9% were moderate, 40% low, and 41.1% very low quality. Pooled analyses demonstrated that inositol significantly improved multiple outcomes compared to placebo/FA: it reduced serum luteinizing hormone (LH: MD -3.43 IU/L, 95% CI [-4.29, -2.56], P < 0.00001), total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT: MD -0.02 nmol/L, 95% CI [-0.02, -0.01], P < 0.00001), improved sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG: MD 36.72 nmol/L, 95% CI [28.52, 44.91], P < 0.00001), and androstenedione. Benefits were also observed for homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR: MD -1.14, 95% CI [-1.35, -0.94], P < 0.00001), fasting insulin (FI: MD -23.40 pmol/L, 95% CI [-32.80, -14.01], P < 0.00001), triglycerides, and reproductive outcomes (live births: Risk Ratio [RR] 2.29, 95% CI [1.07, 4.93], P = 0.03; ovulation rate: RR 2.75, 95% CI [1.71, 4.41], P < 0.0001). However, versus metformin(MET), its effects on most parameters were not significant, except for triglycerides and pregnancy rates. Cross-subgroup analysis of inositol subtypes indicated MI/MI+FA was superior for metabolic and reproductive outcomes, while D-chiro-inositol monotherapy should be used with caution in clinical practice; combination therapy did not consistently outperform monomers. CONCLUSION: Inositol improves core PCOS manifestations. Supported by moderate-quality evidence for effects on TT, FT, SHBG, HOMA-IR, and pregnancy/ovulation rates, it is a promising therapy. Differenti

PURPOSE: Metformin was the first medication targeting insulin resistance in PCOS, and it has been extensively studied as a metabolic treatment option. In recent years, inositols have emerged as potential treatment options for PCOS, but confidence in the available evidence supporting their use is limited. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for RCTs comparing the use of combined metformin and inositol versus metformin alone in women with PCOS. A random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value of <0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. RESULTS: Six RCTs and 388 patients were included in the analysis, with follow-up ranging from 3 to 6 months. Combination therapy was significantly associated with improved menstrual cycle regularity (RR 1.56; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.41; p = 0.04), and lower values of modified Ferriman-Gallwey score (MD -0.97; 95% CI -1.53 to -0.40; p < 0.01) and LH/FSH ratios (MD -0.13; 95% CI -0.24 to -0.03; p = 0.01). Differences in acne (p = 0.58), body mass index (p = 0.13), fasting blood glucose (p = 0.07) and HOMA-IR (p = 0.25) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of RCTs, combination therapy was associated with cycle regularization and reduction in hirsutism and LH/FSH ratio compared to metformin monotherapy. Further studies are needed to clarify the true benefits of the use of inositol in PCOS treatment. © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Erratum in J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Nov 18;109(12):e2365. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae588. CONTEXT: Insulin resistance is common in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Inositol may have insulin sensitizing effects; however, its efficacy in the management of PCOS remains indeterminate. OBJECTIVE: To inform the 2023 international evidence-based guidelines in PCOS, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of inositol, alone or in combination with other therapies, in the management of PCOS. DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, All EBM, and CINAHL from inception until August 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Thirty trials (n = 2230; 1093 intervention, 1137 control), with 19 pooled in meta-analyses were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted for hormonal, metabolic, lipids, psychological, anthropometric, reproductive outcomes, and adverse effects by 1 reviewer, independently verified by a second. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen comparisons were assessed, with 3 in meta-analyses. Evidence suggests benefits for myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol (DCI) for some metabolic measures and potential benefits from DCI for ovulation, but inositol may have no effect on other outcomes. Metformin may improve waist-hip ratio and hirsutism compared to inositol, but there is likely no difference for reproductive outcomes, and the evidence is very uncertain for body mass indexI. Myo-inositol likely causes fewer gastrointestinal adverse events compared with metformin; however, these are typically mild and self-limited. CONCLUSION: The evidence supporting the use of inositol in the management of PCOS is limited and inconclusive. Clinicians and their patients should consider the uncertainty of the evidence together with individual values and preferences when engaging in shared decision-making regarding the use of inositol for PCOS. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) treatment in adolescents currently focuses on lifestyle interventions, with pharmacological treatment options often limited to hormonal contraceptives. Several of these carry broad side-effect profiles and are not always accepted by young girls. There is growing interest in non-hormonal therapies for PCOS. We aimed to collate the evidence on the use of myoinositol or D-chiro-inositol in the improvement of PCOS symptoms in symptomatic adolescents. CONTENT: A systematic literature review identifying key articles from inception to March 2023. Participants: Female adolescents (aged 12-19 years) with PCOS or PCOS-like features. Intervention: Myoinositol or D-chiro-inositol with or without additional interventions. Comparison: Any other treatment, including lifestyle interventions, hormonal therapy, metformin or no treatment. The main outcome measure were improvement in symptoms, quality of life and adverse effects. SUMMARY: Eight studies were included: two randomised open-label trials, one quasi-randomised and three non-randomised interventional studies, one case-control study and one cohort study. All studies showed improvements in some biochemical markers, metabolic parameters or clinical symptoms, but these were not reproducible across all studies. OUTLOOK: The benefit of myoinositol in adolescents with PCOS remains unclear, with limited high-quality evidence. This review highlights the need for robustly conducted research to inform clinical practice. © 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

36. J Reprod Immunol. 2019 Sep;134-135:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 26. Exploring strengths and limits of urinary D-chiro inositol phosphoglycans (IPG-P) as a screening test for preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scioscia M(1), Noventa M(2), Cavallin F(

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is characterised by infrequent or absent ovulation, and high levels of androgens and insulin (hyperinsulinaemia). Hyperinsulinaemia occurs secondary to insulin resistance and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Insulin-sensitising agents such as metformin may be effective in treating PCOS-related anovulation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of insulin-sensitising drugs in improving reproductive and metabolic outcomes for women with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases from inception to January 2017: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL. We searched registers of ongoing trials and reference lists from relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of insulin-sensitising drugs compared with placebo, no treatment, or an ovulation-induction agent for women with oligo and anovulatory PCOS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and bias. Primary outcomes were live birth rate and gastrointestinal adverse effects. Secondary outcomes included other pregnancy outcomes, menstrual frequency and metabolic effects. We combined data to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and reported quality of the evidence for primary outcomes using GRADE methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We assessed the interventions metformin, clomiphene citrate, metformin plus clomiphene citrate, D-chiro-inositol, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. We compared these with each other, placebo or no treatment. We included 48 studies (4451 women), 42 of which investigated metformin (4024 women). Evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate. Limitations were risk of bias (poor reporting of methodology and incomplete outcome data), imprecision and inconsistency. Metformin versus placebo or no treatmentThe evidence suggests that metformin may improve live birth rates compared with placebo (OR 1.59, 95%

A growing body of research has investigated the association between inositol and diabetes. The purpose of this review is to report through a systematic way the current scientific evidence relating potential benefits of inositol isomers on diabetes/gestational diabetes. The screening of the studies published last decade was performed in 4 databases (Pubmed-Web of Science-The Cochrane Library-Lilacs). Among the 1640 studies identified in the search, only 26 studies had sufficient data to be included in the systematic review. The available literature suggests that inositol seems to be provide improvements in fasting blood glucose and other biochemical results, which are among the most important parameters in diabetic individuals. Although there are some studies demonstrating that inositol may be effective in prevention and treatment of diabetes/gestational diabetes, conduction of studies with larger sample and longer follow-up duration is required for it to be represented as an effective strategy in management of diabetes.