NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Electrolyte Powder

SPORTS · Evidence Monograph

Electrolyte Powder is an evidence-graded sports monograph evaluated across 19 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (0 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 12 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 8,871 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) Moderate (3.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 19 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 0 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 12 RCTs (9 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 8,871
Reported Trial Dosages 200 mg · 400 mg · 800 mg
Trial Duration Range 6 months · 16 weeks · 56 days
Reading Time ~10 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 19 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE Moderate).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (200 mg · 400 mg · 800 mg) over a structured 6 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary sports clinical efficacy (19 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (14 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (12 RCTs · 9 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (0 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Electrolyte Powder & Why Does Form Matter?

Electrolyte Powder is classified under SPORTS and has been investigated across 19 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Electrolyte Powder frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (12 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Electrolyte Powder acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Electrolyte Powder an overall evidence rating of GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) based on 19 PubMed studies: 0 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 12 randomized controlled trials (9 double-blind, n = 8,871 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40269724 (2025) — "A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy." (CONCLUSIONS: The magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, and potassium sulfate concentrated oral solution is a novel, safe, and effective bowel preparation for colonoscopy.) • PMID:38713137 (2024) — "Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder Combined With Linaclotide for Colon Cleansing in Patients With Chronic Constipation Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial." (No statistically significant difference in willingness to repeat the colonoscopy, sleep quality, polyp detection rate, or adenoma detection rate was observed among groups.) • PMID:37795904 (2024) — "Lactulose vs Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Based on BMI." (Compared with the PEG group, individuals in the lactulose group had a significantly higher adenoma detection rate (50% vs 33.5%, P < 0.05) and taste scores (8.82 vs 6.69, P < 0.05), as well as significantly fewer adverse reactions (6.5% vs 32.5%, P < 0.05).)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 200 mg · 400 mg · 800 mg · 450 mg over 6 months · 16 weeks · 56 days · 14 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Electrolyte Powder, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (200 mg · 400 mg · 800 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 6 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (19 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) BMC gastroenterology (2025) PMID: 40269724 ↗
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in BMC gastroenterology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, and potassium sulfate concentrated oral solution is a novel, safe, and effective bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The quality of colonoscopy is significantly influenced by the effectiveness of bowel preparation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bowel cleansing between a new oral sulfate solution (OSS) and standard polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG). METHODS: This single center, randomized, superiority study recruited 679 outpatients who were assigned to either the new OSS group (Group A) or standard PEG group (Group B). The quality of bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and compared between the two groups. Furthermore, data pertaining to the duration of bowel preparation, patient tolerability, and the occurrence of adverse events were also analyzed. RESULTS: According to BBPS scores, group A demonstrated significantly higher bowel preparation cleanliness than group B. Additionally, group A achieved superior bowel cleansing, as evidenced by a greater proportion of patients with BBPS scores ≥ 8 compared to group B (75.3% vs. 55.2%, P < 0.05). No severe adverse events were reported during examinations in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, and potassium sulfate concentrated oral solution is a novel, safe, and effective bowel preparation for colonoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 20/02/2024 (clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2400081004). © 2025. The Author(s).

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Clinical and translational gastroenterology (2024) PMID: 38713137 ↗
Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder Combined With Linaclotide for Colon Cleansing in Patients With Chronic Constipation Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Clinical and translational gastroenterology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: No statistically significant difference in willingness to repeat the colonoscopy, sleep quality, polyp detection rate, or adenoma detection rate was observed among groups.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Constipation is an independent risk factor for poor bowel preparation. This study aimed to evaluate the bowel cleansing efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG) combined with linaclotide (lin) for colonoscopy in patients with chronic constipation (CC). METHODS: This single-blinded, randomized, controlled, and multicenter study was conducted from July 2021 to December 2022 at 7 hospitals. Patients with CC who underwent colonoscopies were enrolled and randomly assigned to 4 groups with split-PEG regimens: 4L-PEG group, 4L-PEG+1d-Lin group, 3L-PEG+1d-Lin group, and 3L-PEG+3d-Lin group. The primary outcome was rates of adequate bowel preparation, defined as a total BBPS score ≥6 and a score ≥2 for each segment. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects, sleep quality, willingness to repeat the colonoscopy, adenoma detection rate, and polyp detection rate. RESULTS: Five hundred two patients were enrolled. The rates of adequate bowel preparation (80.0% vs 60.3%, P < 0.001; 84.4% vs 60.3%, P < 0.001) and the total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores (6.90 ± 1.28 vs 6.00 ± 1.61, P < 0.001; 7.03 ± 1.24 vs 6.00 ± 1.61, P < 0.01) in the 4L-PEG+1d-Lin group and the 3L-PEG+3d-Lin group were superior to that in the 4L-PEG group. Compared with the 4L-PEG group, the 4L-PEG+1d-Lin group (66.7% vs 81.7%, P = 0.008) and the 3L-PEG+3d-Lin group (75.0% vs 81.7%, P = 0.224) had a lower percentage of mild adverse events. No statistically significant difference in willingness to repeat the colonoscopy, sleep quality, polyp detection rate, or adenoma detection rate was observed among groups. DISCUSSION: PEG combined with linaclotide might be an effective method for bowel preparation before colonoscopy in patients with CC.

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Clinical and translational gastroenterology (2024) PMID: 37795904 ↗
Lactulose vs Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Based on BMI.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Clinical and translational gastroenterology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Compared with the PEG group, individuals in the lactulose group had a significantly higher adenoma detection rate (50% vs 33.5%, P < 0.05) and taste scores (8.82 vs 6.69, P < 0.05), as well as significantly fewer adverse reactions (6.5% vs 32.5%, P < 0.05).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is currently considered as one of the principal techniques to diagnose the colorectal diseases. Admittedly, qualified bowel preparation before colonoscopy is a premise for high-quality examination. Lower quality bowel preparation might seriously impede visualization of the intestinal mucosa, resulting in missed and misdiagnosed intestinal lesions. Therefore, it is necessary to choose the appropriate oral laxative based on the guarantee of safety and efficacy. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to compare lactulose oral solution and polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte powder for bowel preparation using the following indicators: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, Bowel Bubble Score, detection rate of adenoma and lesion, patients' satisfaction, and adverse effects. Our study investigated the suitability of 2 bowel preparation reagents for patients with different body mass indices mainly based on body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: In the lactulose group, there was a significant improvement in the quality of bowel preparation compared with those in the PEG group ( P < 0.05), especially in people with normal BMI and higher BMI. Compared with the PEG group, individuals in the lactulose group had a significantly higher adenoma detection rate (50% vs 33.5%, P < 0.05) and taste scores (8.82 vs 6.69, P < 0.05), as well as significantly fewer adverse reactions (6.5% vs 32.5%, P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Lactulose oral solution is superior to PEG in bowel preparation quality and taste, especially in normal BMI and higher BMI groups. It can be used clinically as a potential and promising bowel preparation agent in the future. Clinical Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100054318.

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics (2022) PMID: 35527411 ↗
[Clinical efficacy of adaptive biofeedback training combined with oral administration of compound polyethylene glycol 4000-electrolyte powder in the treatment of children with outlet obstruction constipation: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics involving n = 84 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive biofeedback training combined with oral administration of compound polyethylene glycol 4000-electrolyte powder is significantly associated with improvement of clinical outcomes in the treatment of children with OOC.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To study the clinical efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of adaptive biofeedback training combined with oral administration of compound polyethylene glycol 4000-electrolyte powder in the treatment of children with outlet obstruction constipation (OOC). METHODS: A total of 168 children with OOC were enrolled in this prospective study. All the subjects were randomly divided into a test group and a control group based on the order of visiting time, 84 in each group. The test group was treated with adaptive biofeedback training combined with oral administration of compound polyethylene glycol 4000-electrolyte powder, and the control group was treated with oral administration of compound polyethylene glycol 4000-electrolyte powder alone. Eleven children in the test group and two children in the control group withdrew from the study since they could not finish the whole treatment course. Finally, 73 children in the test group and 82 children in the control group were included in this analysis. As clinical outcomes, the total score of clinical symptoms and overall response rate were compared between the two groups at weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the total score of clinical symptoms between the two groups at beginning of treatment and at week 4 (P>0.05), while the test group had a significantly lower total score of clinical symptoms than the control group at week 8 (P<0.05). At week 4, there was no significant difference in overall response rate between the two groups (P>0.05), while the test group had a significantly higher overall response rate than the control group at week 8 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive biofeedback training combined with oral administration of compound polyethylene glycol 4000-electrolyte powder is significantly associated with improvement of clinical outcomes in the treatment of children with OOC. Publisher: 目的: 探讨自适应式生物反馈疗法联合口服复方聚乙二醇4000电解质散在儿童出口梗阻型便秘治疗中的临床疗效,为出口梗阻型便秘患儿寻找合理而有效的治疗方法。方法: 前瞻性选取168例出口梗阻型便秘患儿为研究对象,按来院就诊次序随机分成试验组和对照组(n=84),试验组采用自适应式生物反馈疗法联合口服复方聚乙二醇4000电解质散治疗,对照组仅采用口服复方聚乙二醇4000电解质散治疗。最终因无法坚持治疗试验组退出11例,余73例;对照组退出2例,余82例。通过临床症状总积分和总有效率比较两组患儿治疗4周和8周时的疗效。结果: 治疗前和治疗4周时两组临床症状总

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Food & function (2026) PMID: 41704173 ↗
The dose-response effects of nitrate-rich beetroot ingestion on cardiovascular and endothelial function: a randomised controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Food & function. Key conclusion: These findings improve our understanding of NO3- supplementation and cardiovascular function in healthy adults.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Dietary nitrate (NO3-) supplementation has been reported to improve cardiovascular health, but beyond its effects on brachial artery blood pressure (BP), dose-response effects on other cardiovascular variables are unclear. This study assessed the effects of three acute NO3- doses (200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg NO3--rich beetroot powder) on brachial and aortic BP, arterial stiffness and macrovascular endothelial function, in a double-blind, randomised, crossover design. Cardiovascular variables and venous blood samples were measured prior to (control) and 2.5 h post supplement ingestion. Dietary NO3- supplementation increased plasma [NO3-] and plasma [nitrite] but had no effect on cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) concentration. Arterial stiffness markers improved following all NO3- doses, with no between-dose differences. However, endothelial function only improved following 400 mg (+3.07% compared to control) and aortic systolic BP only improved following 800 mg (-4 mmHg compared to control) dietary NO3- supplementation. Acute NO3- ingestion improved some cardiovascular risk factors, including arterial stiffness, macrovascular endothelial function and aortic systolic BP with different dose-response effects, but had no effect on brachial BP or plasma [cGMP]. These findings improve our understanding of NO3- supplementation and cardiovascular function in healthy adults.

06
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism (2025) PMID: 40812383 ↗
A Novel Honey Powder-Based Supplement Containing Carbohydrate and Protein Did Not Improve Endurance Performance in Recreationally Trained Cyclists.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism; statistical significance reported at p = 0.72. Key conclusion: This novel HP supplement did not improve endurance performance in this study, though future research with higher doses is encouraged.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Sports supplements composed of carbohydrate and protein are widely used by endurance athletes and recreational practitioners, mostly aimed at improving performance. This study investigated the effect of a novel carbohydrate + protein honey powder (HP) product on endurance cycling performance and physiological and perceptual responses using a double-blind, crossover, counterbalanced, placebo-controlled (PLA) design. Twelve male cyclists exercised for 100 min (i.e., 5 min at 1 W/kg of body mass, followed by three sets of 10-min stages at 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 W/kg, followed by 5 min at 1 W/kg), followed by a 20-min self-paced time trial (20-min TT). Blood glucose, lactate, pH, bicarbonate, heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion, and side effects were analyzed throughout the 100-min cycling protocol and the 20-min TT. The 20-min TT performance was similar between HP and PLA (total work done: 294 ± 40 vs. 292 ± 44 kJ, p = .72; mean power output: 245 ± 33 vs. 243 ± 37 W, p = .61), as was blood glucose, lactate, pH, and ratings of perceived exertion either during the 100 or 20-min TT protocols (all p > .05). Blood bicarbonate was lower in HP compared with PLA throughout the 100-min protocol (p = .01), and heart rate was higher in HP compared with PLA during the 20-min TT (p = .01). Finally, HP supplementation did not elicit greater side effects compared with PLA, either during the 100 or the 20-min TT protocols (all p > .05). This novel HP supplement did not improve endurance performance in this study, though future research with higher doses is encouraged.

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) BMC gastroenterology (2025) PMID: 40597656 ↗
Clinical application of pre-rehabilitation concept on comfort colonoscopy in Chinese elderly patients: a randomised controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in BMC gastroenterology involving n = 485 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The combination of additional enteral nutrition supplements and psychological counseling can enhance the quality of bowel preparation, decrease the incidence of hypoglycemia, and improve patient satisfaction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The concept of pre-rehabilitation has been clinically implemented across various surgical fields; however, studies investigating its application in colonoscopy remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of the pre-rehabilitation concept in bowel preparation for comfort colonoscopy among elderly Chinese patients. METHODS: The enrolled patients were randomly allocated into the pre-rehabilitation and control groups. Prior to colonoscopy, patients in the pre-rehabilitation group received supplementary oral administration of ENSURE (Enteral Nutritional Powder) and psychological counseling provided by specialty nurses. The control group received only Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Powder. The primary outcome was the quality of bowel preparation, assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Secondary outcomes included the polyp detection rate, incidence of adverse effects, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 485 patients who were admitted for colonoscopy during hospitalization were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The Boston total score in the pre-rehabilitation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001). The colon polyp detection rates in the two groups were 78.5% and 67.3%, respectively (P = 0.006). Patients in the pre-rehabilitation group reported higher satisfaction with colonoscopy procedures and experienced a lower incidence of hypoglycemic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of additional enteral nutrition supplements and psychological counseling can enhance the quality of bowel preparation, decrease the incidence of hypoglycemia, and improve patient satisfaction. This intervention measure is both feasible and worthy of clinical application and promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 14/05/2025 (clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2500102405). Retrospectively registered. © 2025. The Author(s).

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2025) PMID: 40431460 ↗
Short-Term Beetroot Juice Supplementation Enhances Strength, Reduces Fatigue, and Promotes Recovery in Physically Active Individuals: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: SmO2 was higher in BJ at 70-80% 1RM) and further improved after 7
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background/Objectives: Beetroot juice (BJ), a natural source of dietary nitrate, has gained increasing attention for its potential to improve exercise performance and cardiovascular function. While its benefits are well documented in endurance contexts, less is known about its short-term effects on resistance training performance and recovery. Thus, this study investigated the effects of short-term BJ supplementation on strength performance, cardiovascular responses, muscle oxygenation, and post-exercise recovery in resistance-trained males. Methods: Twelve healthy men (age: 21.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index: 21.42 ± 2.36 kg/m2) completed two supplementation protocols involving BJ, providing 450 mg of nitrate per day, and a nitrate-free placebo (PLA). Each protocol consisted of two laboratory visits, one to assess the acute ergogenic effects and another to evaluate recovery after 72 h, resulting in a total of four sessions over a two-week period. During the three consecutive days of supplementation, participants ingested a single 900 mL dose (15 g BJ powder/PLA) 2 h before the first session, followed by three daily 300 mL doses (5 g BJ each/PLA) over the next two days, and a final dose (15 g BJ powder/PLA) taken 2 h before the second session (72 h post-first session). Each testing session involved incremental back squat (BS) and bench press (BP) exercises at 60%, 70%, and 80% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) performed to failure, with three-minute rest intervals between sets. Repetition to failure, movement velocity, peak power, peak heart rate (HR), and muscle oxygenation (SmO2) were recorded during BP and BS exercises. Heart rate variability (HRV) and blood lactate were assessed before and after each training session. Lower-limb strength (CMJ and SJ) and delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were assessed daily during the 3-day supplementation period. Results: BJ significantly increased repetitions completed at 80% 1RM during BP and BS (p < 0.05) compared to the PLA. Peak movement velocity improved across all intensities using BJ with higher values compared to the PLA at 60-80% 1RM (p < 0.05). SmO2 was higher in BJ at 70-80% 1RM) and further improved after 7

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Heliyon (2025) PMID: 40083990 ↗
A randomized multi-arm open labelled comparative clinical trial report of Pankajakasthuri DiabetEaze powder, a novel polyherbal formulation on the nutritional management and glycemic control in type 2 diabetic and prediabetic patients.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Heliyon involving n = 189 participants. Key conclusion: Furthermore, overall QoL among the tested groups was also statistically significant.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has been associated with heightened susceptibility to malnutrition, suggesting that augmenting nutritional intake stands out as a potent therapeutic strategy for addressing malnutrition in individuals with DM. The aim of this clinical investigation was to evaluate the effect of DiabetEaze powder, a polyherbal nutritional formulation developed by us for nutritional management and glycaemic control, on patients with diabetic and prediabetic conditions. METHODS: A total of 143 type II diabetic (T2D) patients who were managing their diabetic condition through modern medicine, AYUSH medicine, lifestyle modification and 68 pre-diabetic patients, aged between 40 and 65 years, were randomly assigned into six groups: control, modern, AYUSH, lifestyle, prediabetic control and prediabetic trial. The treatment groups were administered 5 g of DiabetEaze powder two times a day after food for 6 months. Microminerals, vitamins, glycaemic parameters, Quality of Life (QoL), hematology, lipid profiles, Renal Function Test (RFT) and Liver Function Test (LFL) parameters, and electrolytes were evaluated at Day 0, Day 90, and Day 180. RESULTS: Out of 211 enrolled patients, 189 individuals successfully completed the entire 180-day duration of the study, indicating a retention rate of approximately 89.6 %. In our study, we observed a statistically significant elevation in the levels of vitamin D, B2, and B6 across all treatment groups. Besides, the treatment groups displayed a notable increase in zinc and manganese levels compared to the other minerals tested. Notably, the treatment groups demonstrated distinct mineral and vitamin profiles. In terms of metabolic markers, significant reductions in Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS)/Post Prandial Blood Sugar (PPBS) were observed across the modern, AYUSH, and lifestyle groups, while the modern group also showed a marked decrease in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Furthermore, overall QoL among the tested groups was also statistically significant. The consistent maintenance of normal LFT and RFT parameters and electrolyte levels across trial groups throughout the study duration indicates that

10
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (2025) PMID: 39714103 ↗
Investigation of the effect of nitrate and L-arginine intake on aerobic, anaerobic performance, balance, agility, and recovery in elite taekwondo athletes.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. Key conclusion: It was determined that taking NIT and L-ARG supplements alone contributed to the improvement of improving athletes' performance in Wingate mean power values and subsequent fatigue level compared to PLA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Taekwondo is a complex martial art that requires speed, balance, agility, and endurance. This study aims to examine the effects of nitrate and L-arginine supplementation on acute aerobic and anaerobic performance, balance, agility, and recovery in elite taekwondo athletes. METHOD: This study was conducted as a double-blind, randomized, crossover study with the participation of 15 experienced taekwondo athletes aged 19.06 ± 0.96 years and 8.93 ± 1.27 years of training experience. Participants visited the laboratory a total of nine times, including a practice session and anthropometric measurements. These visits consisted of eight experimental sessions conducted at 72-hour intervals. The experimental sessions were conducted with nitrate, L-arginine, and a combination of both supplements (NIT*L-ARG) and placebo. Nitrate supplementation was provided by homogenizing fresh spinach (837.40 mg/kg), while L-ARG was given as a single dose of 6 g in powder form three hours before exercise. RESULTS: NIT*L-ARG supplementation significantly improved the anaerobic performance of athletes in Wingate peak power and peak power (w/kg) compared to placebo and in mean power compared to NIT, L-ARG, and PLA. In addition, NIT*L-ARG supplementation significantly improved blood lactate levels and agility performance immediately after Wingate and Shuttle run tests. CONCLUSION: The combined intake of NIT*L-ARG was found to be effective in improving aerobic, anaerobic, and agility performances as well as fatigue levels of athletes. It was determined that taking NIT and L-ARG supplements alone contributed to the improvement of improving athletes' performance in Wingate mean power values and subsequent fatigue level compared to PLA.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category