NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 2 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Ginkgo Biloba (120mg)

SLEEP COGNITION · Evidence Monograph

Ginkgo Biloba (120mg) is an evidence-graded sleep cognition monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (7 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 47,503 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 7 Meta · 2 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (1 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 47,503
Reported Trial Dosages 240 mg · 600 mg/day · 240 mg/day
Trial Duration Range 1 months · 12 weeks · 2 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (240 mg · 600 mg/day · 240 mg/day) over a structured 1 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary sleep cognition clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (18 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (5 RCTs · 1 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (7 meta-analyses · 2 reviews)
01

What Is Ginkgo Biloba (120mg) & Why Does Form Matter?

Ginkgo Biloba (120mg) is classified under SLEEP COGNITION and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (240 mg, 600 mg/day, 240 mg/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Ginkgo Biloba (120mg) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Ginkgo Biloba (120mg) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Ginkgo Biloba (120mg) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 7 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (1 double-blind, n = 47,503 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:42051256 (2026) — "Efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract injection for vascular cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: The addition of SXNI to conventional treatment may provide additional benefits in cognition, neurological function, and activities of daily living with no significant increase in reported adverse events compared with conventional treatment.) • PMID:41908799 (2025) — "Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 in patients with dementia and a history of cerebral infarction-meta-analysis of pooled data from randomised clinical trials." (CONCLUSION: The results of our meta-analysis of patients with mild to moderate dementia who had previously had a cerebral infarction verified by neuroimaging showed statistically significant and clinically relevant benefits of EGb 761.) • PMID:41878732 (2026) — "Systematic review and meta-analysis of antioxidant treatment in patients with acute mountain sickness induced by high altitude exposure." (CONCLUSION: Current evidence does not demonstrate a statistically sig)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 420512561.27 (3.06–4.17)PMID 416418800.980.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 240 mg · 600 mg/day · 240 mg/day · 120 mg/day over 1 months · 12 weeks · 2 weeks · 3 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MAJOR] Warfarin: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:15625333). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

• [MAJOR] Aspirin: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:15625333). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (240 mg · 600 mg/day · 240 mg/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 1 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Warfarin, Aspirin.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 18 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in pharmacology (2026) PMID: 42051256 ↗
Efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract injection for vascular cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in pharmacology involving n = 2,375 participants (RR 1.27). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The addition of SXNI to conventional treatment may provide additional benefits in cognition, neurological function, and activities of daily living with no significant increase in reported adverse events compared with conventional treatment.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Shuxuening injection (SXNI), a standardized injectable formulation of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract, is widely used in China for vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), However, evidence-based evaluation remains limited. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials published before 1 September 2025, were searched in eight databases. Patients had vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), with the control group receiving conventional treatment and the treatment group receiving additional SXNI therapy. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), while secondary outcomes included the Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS), Barthel Index (BI), overall response rate, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and adverse event incidence. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Risk ratios (RR) were used for binary variables; mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for continuous variables. RESULTS: Twenty-two trials (n = 2,375) were included. All trials were conducted in China between 2005 and 2025. Compared with the control group, SXNI was associated with higher MMSE (MD 3.61, 95% CI 3.06-4.17), HDS (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.21-2.39), and BI (MD 9.06, 95% CI 4.66-13.45), a higher overall response rate (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.33), and lower NIHSS (MD -6.17, 95% CI -7.90 to -4.45). Seven studies reported adverse events; and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.36-1.44). CONCLUSION: The addition of SXNI to conventional treatment may provide additional benefits in cognition, neurological function, and activities of daily living with no significant increase in reported adverse events compared with conventional treatment. However, the certainty of evidence is limited by methodological weaknesses and uncertainty regarding the comparability of preparations from different manufacturers. Therefore, high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=557472, identifier CRD42024557472.

02
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in neurology (2025) PMID: 41908799 ↗
Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 in patients with dementia and a history of cerebral infarction-meta-analysis of pooled data from randomised clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in neurology involving n = 488 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0467. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The results of our meta-analysis of patients with mild to moderate dementia who had previously had a cerebral infarction verified by neuroimaging showed statistically significant and clinically relevant benefits of EGb 761.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Ginkgo biloba leaf extracts belong to the most popular herbal medicines for the treatment of neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) or stroke. EGb 761, a proprietary ginkgo leaf extract, has been shown to improve brain cell energy supply, to enhance neurogenesis and neuroplasticity, to decrease blood viscosity and improve brain perfusion. Thereby it improves cognitive performance, neuropsychiatric symptoms and activities of daily living in patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. It has further been shown to be beneficial for patients after ischaemic stroke. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the treatment effects of EGb 761 in patients who had developed dementia following a cerebral infarction. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of pooled data from clinical trials with EGb 761 in mild to moderate dementia in the subgroup of patients who had a cerebral infarction. Four randomised, placebo-controlled trials with homogeneous patient selection and design were included. Previous stroke was diagnosed by neuroimaging. The analysis focused on the comparison of treatment effects in the domains of cognition, activities of daily living and global assessment. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included data from 488 patients. Significant treatment effects of 240 mg EGb 761 daily versus placebo were found for cognition (p = 0.0467), activities of daily living (p = 0.0230), and global clinical impression (p = 0.0371). The rates of adverse events and adverse drug reactions in the EGb 761 group were like those in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: The results of our meta-analysis of patients with mild to moderate dementia who had previously had a cerebral infarction verified by neuroimaging showed statistically significant and clinically relevant benefits of EGb 761. The drug was shown to be safe and well tolerated and is a promising treatment option for patients developing dementia after cerebral infarction. Further dedicated clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

03
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in physiology (2026) PMID: 41878732 ↗
Systematic review and meta-analysis of antioxidant treatment in patients with acute mountain sickness induced by high altitude exposure.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in physiology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.14. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Current evidence does not demonstrate a statistically sig
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS) is a frequent condition triggered by exposure to hypobaric hypoxia at high altitude. Its pathophysiology involves endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress, with elevated oxidative molecules identified as key contributors to its development. Antioxidant therapies such as vitamins C/E, α-lipoic acid, and Ginkgo biloba have been proposed, though results across studies remain inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effects of antioxidant treatments in subjects with AMS induced by high-altitude exposure, examining their impact on clinical outcomes and oxidative stress markers. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA2020 guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through November 2025, supplemented by snowball methods, focusing on studies investigating antioxidant treatments in humans exposed to hypobaric or high-altitude hypoxia. Inclusion criteria were original research in English with full-text availability, human exposure to hypobaric hypoxia, AMS assessment using the Lake Louise Score (LLS), and explicit antioxidant interventions compared with placebo or control. A random-effects meta-analysis using the REML estimator was applied to calculate relative risk (RR), including continuity corrections for zero-event studies. Data extraction was performed in duplicate, and risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: The search yielded 727 records; nineteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and four trials provided comparable dichotomous data for quantitative analysis. Pooled estimates showed a non-significant trend toward reduced AMS incidence with antioxidant treatment (RR ≈ 0.73; 95% CI: 0.47-1.11; p = 0.14). Moderate heterogeneity was detected (I2 = 52%, Q p = 0.048). Although not statistically significant, all studies showed a direction of effect favoring antioxidants. Nevertheless, interpretation is limited using pre-2018 LLS diagnostic criteria, absence of studies under chronic intermittent hypobaric hypoxia, and methodological variability. CONCLUSION: Current evidence does not demonstrate a statistically sig

04
META-ANALYSIS Phytomedicine (2026) PMID: 41678913 ↗
Comparative effects of Bacopa monnieri and Ginkgo biloba on cognitive functions: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Phytomedicine involving n = 2,107 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Brahmi, particularly in high-dose formulations, shows promise as a cognitive enhancer compared to Ginkgo in healthy adults.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Growing cognitive health interest fuels 8.3% market growth. Bacopa monnieri Wettst. (Brahmi) and Ginkgo biloba L. (Ginkgo) are among the most studied natural nootropics, but their effects have not been directly compared. This study aimed to evaluate and compare their efficacy in healthy adults using a network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Dissertations in November 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on healthy adults receiving Brahmi or Ginkgo extracts and reported cognitive outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2. Cognitive outcomes were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) under a random-effects model. Interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs (n = 2107) were included. High-dose Brahmi (≥600 mg/day) significantly improved working memory compared to low-dose Brahmi (300 to <600 mg/day), high-dose Ginkgo (≥240 mg/day), low-dose Ginkgo (60 to <240 mg/day), and placebo, with SMDs (95% CI) of 1.84 (1.05-2.64), 1.94 (1.10-2.77), 2.04 (1.24-2.84), and 2.03 (1.28-2.78), respectively. A SUCRA of 100% further supports the strong efficacy of high-dose Brahmi. It also demonstrated significantly greater benefits for short-term memory. For delayed memory, low-dose Brahmi outperformed both low-dose Ginkgo and placebo. No significant differences were observed in sustained attention, selective attention, or processing speed. CONCLUSION: Brahmi, particularly in high-dose formulations, shows promise as a cognitive enhancer compared to Ginkgo in healthy adults. However, the lack of direct comparisons may limit the strength of this evidence. OTHER: The authors are grateful for financial support from The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (RGJ-Ph.D. Program), Thailand Research Fund (TRF) (N41A670299). This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251034900).

05
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2026) PMID: 41641880 ↗
Ginkgo biloba for cognitive impairment and dementia.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 10,613 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 1 (RR 0.98). Key conclusion: SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's register, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, and two trials registries on 8 December 2022.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a neurocognitive disorder that interferes with cognition and independent functioning. Common dementia subtypes include Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and mixed type. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a risk factor for dementia, and subjective cognitive complaints may be the earliest manifestation. Although cholinesterase inhibitors may help reduce some cognitive and behavioral symptoms, there is no established treatment that cures or slows dementia progression. Ginkgo biloba (ginkgo) is a popular herbal preparation that is used to improve brain and circulatory health, and neuroprotective effects are biologically plausible. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of Ginkgo biloba for the treatment of people with cognitive impairment or dementia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's register, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, and two trials registries on 8 December 2022. The search was updated in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the trials registers on 18 November 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ginkgo with placebo, usual treatment, or other treatments for cognitive problems in people with cognitive complaints or diagnoses of MCI or dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed studies for risk of bias. Key outcomes were global clinical status, global cognitive function, activities of daily living (ADLs), adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) at six months. When clinically appropriate, we pooled data using a random-effects model and expressed treatment effects as mean differences (MDs), standardized mean differences (SMDs), or risk ratios (RRs), each with its 95% confidence interval (CI). We used GRADE methods to assess the certainty of the evidence for each estimate. MAIN RESULTS: We included 82 studies with 10,613 participants; 72 studies with 9783 participants provided extractable data. Four studies were at low risk of bias in all domains. Below we present data for the comparison of ginkgo versus placebo in people with different clini

06
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in pharmacology (2025) PMID: 41601988 ↗
Preclinical evidence of ginkgo biloba extract on diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in pharmacology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: GBE may delay the progression of DN through multimodal mechanisms, including inhibition of inflammatory responses, attenuation of oxidative stress, suppression of fibrotic pathways, and modulation of glycolipid metabolism.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the common complications of diabetes, which is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) has shown effectiveness in DN animal models and represents a promising therapeutic candidate. However, a comprehensive preclinical meta-analysis remains to be conducted, and the dose-time effect of GBE in the treatment of DN has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness, mechanism and dose-time effect of GBE for DN by systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Seven databases (PubMed, Web of science, Embase, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases) were searched in this systematic review up to July 2025. Study quality was assessed using SYRCLE bias risk tool. STATA 14.0 software was employed to evaluate fasting blood glucose serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen 24-h urine protein (24 h Upro), kidney index and indicators related to inflammatory response, oxidative stress, fibrosis, and glycolipid metabolism. The dose-time effect of Ginkgo biloba extract was evaluated by three-dimensional dose-time-effect analysis. RESULTS: 30 pertinent articles were included in the meta-analysis. Comparative analysis revealed that GBE exhibited statistically significant effect in reducing FBG, SCr, BUN, 24 h Upro, and KI. Furthermore, it also improved inflammatory indicators such as interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), as well as oxidative stress indicators like superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), antioxidation capability (AOC) and glutathione peroxidases (GSH-Px). Additionally, GBE showed positive effect in alleviating fibrosis and reducing serum total cholesterol (TC) and advanced glycation end products (AGEs). The dose-time-effect diagram showed that the rational dose of GBE for DN treatment was 36-200 mg/kg/d for 8-12 weeks. CONCLUSION: GBE may delay the progression of DN through multimodal mechanisms, including inhibition of inflammatory responses, attenuation of oxidative stress, suppression of fibrotic pathways, and modulation of glycolipid metabolism. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york

07
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in neurology (2025) PMID: 41404461 ↗
Network meta-analysis of the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for post-stroke cognitive impairment and vascular cognitive impairment.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in neurology involving n = 5,599 participants (OR 1.57). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Our network meta-analysis suggests that memantine might have the best effect for P
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Based on recent reviews, vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) encompasses a spectrum of cognitive deficits caused by cerebrovascular disease and its risk factors, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to dementia, and often coexists with neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer's disease. VCI is categorized into four clinical-imaging subtypes, including post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI)-a common stroke complication and major VCI subtype. Current guidelines recommend cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists as first-line treatments for VCI, with expert consensus supporting donepezil and rivastigmine for PSCI. However, existing evidence primarily derives from placebo-controlled or head-to-head drug comparisons, lacking comprehensive evaluations of multiple cognitive enhancers. This study aims to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of cognitive-enhancing drugs in VCI, with a focused analysis on PSCI, to better inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched four databases using predefined search strategies. Eligible studies were selected based on predetermined criteria. The included studies were analyzed with StataSE 16.0, RevMan 5.3, and Grade software to compare the efficacy and safety of cognitive-enhancing drugs to identify the optimal treatment for VCI and PSCI. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (5,599 participants) were included. In terms of cognitive outcomes, sailuotong was superior to placebo on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) (MD = -3.00, 95% CI: -4.50, -1.50) and ranked best (SUCRA 88.5%). Memantine was most effective on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (MD = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.23-2.23; SUCRA 80.8%). For the secondary outcome, the MoCA assessment showed that Ginkgo biloba extract significantly improved Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores compared to placebo (MD = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.35). Regarding safety, donepezil significantly increased the risk of overall adverse events compared to placebo (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.19-2.06). CONCLUSION: Our network meta-analysis suggests that memantine might have the best effect for P

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Fitoterapia (2026) PMID: 41365395 ↗
Effects of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners on acne vulgaris: A systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Fitoterapia. Key conclusion: Incorporating sweeteners, alone or in combination with bioactive compounds, could complement conventional acne therapies, reduce microbial proliferation, modulate inflammatory pathways, and support overall skin health.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Acne vulgaris is a prevalent inflammatory skin disorder influenced by sebaceous gland activity, hormonal regulation, and microbial proliferation. Dietary factors, including sweetening agents, may modulate acne pathophysiology, affecting sebum production, inflammatory responses, and the skin microbiome. This systematic review summarizes the effects of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners on acne-related markers, with a focus on Cutibacterium acnes activity and associated inflammatory pathways. Non-nutritive sweeteners such as mannitol and xylitol show potential in regulating acne pathogenesis and exhibiting antibacterial activity against C. acnes. Strategic combinations of sweeteners with bioactive compounds, such as mannitol with bakuchiol or Ginkgo biloba extract, and xylitol with propanediol and caprylic acid, further enhance anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects, offering a multifaceted approach to acne management. For nutritive sweeteners, experimental evidence suggests that glucose may enhance C. acnes biofilm susceptibility when combined with certain antibiotics. These findings emphasize the importance of careful selection and formulation of sweetening agents in dermatological interventions. Incorporating sweeteners, alone or in combination with bioactive compounds, could complement conventional acne therapies, reduce microbial proliferation, modulate inflammatory pathways, and support overall skin health. This review provides a scientific basis for dietary recommendations and the development of adjunctive acne treatments, highlighting sweetening agents as emerging functional modulators of acne pathogenesis.

09
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW International journal of molecular sciences (2025) PMID: 41226670 ↗
Natural Products in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in International journal of molecular sciences. Key conclusion: Bayo Jimenez MT(1), Rivas-García L(1), Sánchez-González C(1), Grosso G(2), Lipari V(3)(4), Vera-Ramírez L(1
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

9. Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Oct 31;26(21):10631. doi: 10.3390/ijms262110631. Natural Products in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms. Bayo Jimenez MT(1), Rivas-García L(1), Sánchez-González C(1), Grosso G(2), Lipari V(3)(4), Vera-Ramírez L(1

10
META-ANALYSIS Alzheimer's & dementia (2025) PMID: 41198594 ↗
Therapeutic strategies in vascular cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Alzheimer's & dementia involving n = 22,347 participants. Key conclusion: HIGHLIGHTS: Considerable methodological heterogeneity across VCI trials undermined the strength of evidence for both positive and negative findings, ultimately decreasing confidence in the possibility of treating VCI.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is a common, heterogeneous condition, currently lacking approved treatments. METHODS: We reviewed therapeutic strategies tested in VCI and meta-analyzed efficacy data for eligible interventions to assess whether previously tested treatments warranted reconsideration. RESULTS: One-hundred seventy-three trials were extracted (22,347 participants, four VCI categories, 91 interventions, 145 outcomes). Ginkgo biloba extracts showed large to moderate improvements in cognition (Cohen's d: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.00 to 1.67) and small to moderate improvements in functional outcomes (Cohen's d: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.75). Small to moderate improvements in cognition were shown for acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, cerebrolysin, propentofylline, physical exercise, and cognitive rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: VCI clinical trials exhibited substantial heterogeneity. Few interventions were reproducibly tested in adequately sized and designed studies. Nonetheless, some interventions showed modest effects on global cognition and functional outcomes. To enhance the likelihood of success, future studies should focus on promising interventions with a solid rationale, target specific VCI subtypes, improve statistical power, and reduce heterogeneity. HIGHLIGHTS: Considerable methodological heterogeneity across VCI trials undermined the strength of evidence for both positive and negative findings, ultimately decreasing confidence in the possibility of treating VCI. Ginkgo biloba extracts have shown the greatest cognitive and functional benefits, though their clinical significance remains uncertain, and certainty of evidence is overall low. Future trials should focus on a single VCI subtype, prioritize interventions with a strong mechanistic rationale, standardize diagnostic criteria, ensure adequate power for chosen outcomes, test against placebo, and implement FAIR data sharing to accelerate therapeutic discovery. © 2025 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category