NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate)

AMINO ACIDS · Evidence Monograph

HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate) is an evidence-graded amino acids monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (7 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 9,926 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 7 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 7 RCTs (2 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 9,926
Reported Trial Dosages 3 g/day · 3g/day · 3 g
Trial Duration Range 4 weeks · 12 weeks · 30 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (3 g/day · 3g/day · 3 g) over a structured 4 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer
Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime
Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary amino acids clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (19 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (7 RCTs · 2 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (7 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate) & Why Does Form Matter?

HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate) is classified under AMINO ACIDS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (3 g/day, 3g/day, 3 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (7 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate) acts on pathways governing neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 7 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials (2 double-blind, n = 9,926 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41934514 (2026) — "Efficacy of HMB supplementation as an adjunct to resistance training in older adults: a comprehensive meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HMB supplementation and resistance training does not improve body composition or muscle strength in adults aged 50 years and older.) • PMID:41796642 (2026) — "Foods rich in anti-inflammatory components and anti-inflammatory supplements for the prevention and treatment of Sarcopenia in older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis." (For FTSST, a significant improvement was only found for combined supplements in the pairwise meta-analysis (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.05).) • PMID:41305674 (2025) — "The Role of HMB Supplementation in Enhancing the Effects of Resistance Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Muscle Quality, Body Composition, and Physical Function." (CONCLUSIONS: HMB supplementation combined with RT may yield modest improvements in functional performance, particularly handgrip strength and overall physical function, without statically significant effects in body composition and MQ.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 419345140.24 (-0.01–0.49)PMID 417966420.78 (0.07–1.48)PMID 413056740.24 (0–0.48)PMID 409012870.03 (0.04–0.7)PMID 407179980.41 (0.1–0.72)PMID 399996630.32 (0–0.64)-0.23Null (0)1.7Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer. Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 3 g/day · 3g/day · 3 g · 10 g/day over 4 weeks · 12 weeks · 30 days · 2 weeks. Optimal timing window: AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime (Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for HMB (Beta-Hydroxy Beta-Methylbutyrate), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (3 g/day · 3g/day · 3 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 4 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 19 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Age and ageing (2026) PMID: 41934514 ↗
Efficacy of HMB supplementation as an adjunct to resistance training in older adults: a comprehensive meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Age and ageing involving n = 561 participants (SMD 0.24). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HMB supplementation and resistance training does not improve body composition or muscle strength in adults aged 50 years and older.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Resistance training has robust evidence for improving muscle health in older adults; however, the additional benefit of adjunctive supplementation with β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of HMB supplementation combined with resistance training on body composition and muscle strength in adults aged 50 years and older. METHODS: Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane) were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating HMB supplementation with resistance training in older adults. The main results examined fat mass, muscle mass, and muscle strength. Meta-analyses were conducted using robust variance estimation with small-sample corrections. The Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 561 participants were involved in 13 RCTs. According to meta-analysis data, supplementing with HMB is not advantageous concerning fat mass (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.49), muscle mass (SMD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.20), and muscle strength (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.63). There was low heterogeneity for body composition outcomes but high heterogeneity for strength measures. No evidence of publication bias was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HMB supplementation and resistance training does not improve body composition or muscle strength in adults aged 50 years and older. Based on the available evidence, HMB supplementation cannot be recommended as a routine adjunct to resistance training in individuals who are able to undertake structured exercise. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

02
META-ANALYSIS Complementary therapies in medicine (2026) PMID: 41796642 ↗
Foods rich in anti-inflammatory components and anti-inflammatory supplements for the prevention and treatment of Sarcopenia in older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Complementary therapies in medicine involving n = 3,063 participants (SMD 0.78). Key conclusion: For FTSST, a significant improvement was only found for combined supplements in the pairwise meta-analysis (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.05).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dietary anti-inflammatory interventions have shown promise in the prevention and management of sarcopenia. However, the efficacy of various anti-inflammatory diets/supplements in improving muscle strength, mass, and physical performance in patients with sarcopenia remains unclear. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the efficacy of various anti-inflammatory supplements in alleviating symptoms in patients with sarcopenia, thereby providing robust evidence to inform clinical practice and nutritional recommendations. METHODS: This study systematically searched 11 Chinese and English databases in August 2025 to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the intervention effects of anti-inflammatory diets or supplements on elderly patients with sarcopenia. Primary outcomes included handgrip strength, gait speed, the five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST), and the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI). Secondary outcomes included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, fat-free mass (FFM), and laboratory parameters (triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and C-reactive protein). For primary outcomes, both pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed to compare the effects of different interventions. For secondary outcomes, only pairwise meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Finally, 42 randomized controlled trials were included, involving 3063 elderly patients with sarcopenia, covering seven categories of anti-inflammatory supplements: combined supplements (combinations of at least two anti-inflammatory supplements), amino acids, whey protein, β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB), Vitamin D, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and epicatechin. Network meta-analysis results indicated that whey protein (SMD=0.78, 95% CI: 0.07, 1.48), vitamin D (SMD=1.44, 95% CI: 0.76, 2.11), and Epicatechin (SMD=2.44, 95% CI: 1.69, 3.18) are the most effective measures to improve handgrip strength, gait speed, and ASMI, respectively. For FTSST, a significant improvement was only found for combined supplements in the pairwise meta-analysis (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.05). Notably,

03
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2025) PMID: 41305674 ↗
The Role of HMB Supplementation in Enhancing the Effects of Resistance Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Muscle Quality, Body Composition, and Physical Function.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 596 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05 (SMD 0.24). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: HMB supplementation combined with RT may yield modest improvements in functional performance, particularly handgrip strength and overall physical function, without statically significant effects in body composition and MQ.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Resistance training (RT) is a key strategy to counteract age-related declines in muscle strength and physical function. β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) has been proposed as a complementary supplement to enhance these adaptations. However, the additional effects of RT plus HMB (RT+HMB) compared with RT alone remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of RT+HMB versus RT alone on body composition, muscle quality (MQ), and physical function in older adults. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251144810), six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect) were searched up to July 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing RT+HMB with RT alone were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the PEDro scale and risk of bias using Cochrane RoB 2. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Ten trials (n = 596) met inclusion criteria. RT+HMB produced modest and borderline significant improvements in handgrip strength (SMD 0.24; 95% CI 0.00-0.48; p = 0.05) and moderate benefits in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores (SMD 0.54; 95% CI 0.12-0.95; p = 0.01). No significant effects were observed for gait speed, appendicular lean mass, MQ, fat mass, or body weight (p > 0.05). Five trials (50%) were rated at high risk of bias, limiting confidence in pooled estimates. CONCLUSIONS: HMB supplementation combined with RT may yield modest improvements in functional performance, particularly handgrip strength and overall physical function, without statically significant effects in body composition and MQ. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm its clinical relevance.

04
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2026) PMID: 41285365 ↗
Effectiveness of oral nutritional therapy in cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and functional outcomes.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 3,128 participants (RR 0.7). Key conclusion: Handgrip strength improved significantly (MD 2.41 kg; 95 % CI 0.58-4.24; I2 87 %), and LFI showed borderline improvement (MD -0.35; 95 % CI -0.70 to -0.0005; I2 84.4 %).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Liver cirrhosis is a chronic, and progressive condition often complicated by malnutrition, sarcopenia, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and frailty. Malnutrition is highly prevalent in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with an increased risk of decompensation and mortality. Consequently, leading liver societies (ESPEN, EASL, AASLD) recommend personalized nutritional interventions in patients with cirrhosis. While several studies have examined the effects of BCAAs on clinical and functional outcomes in cirrhosis, few have synthesized these outcomes in a single meta-analysis. Despite a growing number of RCTs on HPHC diets and HMB, existing reviews remain largely limited to sarcopenia-related outcomes. To date, no meta-analysis has evaluated the impact of nutritional interventions on frailty-related outcomes in cirrhosis. AIMS: To assess the impact of oral nutritional interventions, including branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), high-protein, high-calorie (HPHC) diets, β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB), and high-protein diets on clinical and functional outcomes in adults with cirrhosis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), of which 18 involving 3128 adults with cirrhosis were included in the meta-analysis, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2025, involving ≥4 weeks of oral nutritional therapy in patients with cirrhosis were included. Data were pooled using random effects model. Sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses explored robustness and potential effect modifiers. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. RESULTS: Nutritional intervention significantly reduced the risk of overt HE (RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.52-0.95; NNT 11; I2 0 %), liver-related decompensation events (RR 0.69; 95 % CI 0.53-0.90; NNT 16; I2 0 %), hospitalization (RR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.49-0.86; NNT 8; I2 21.8 %), and mortality (RR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.49-0.84; NNT 23; I2 0 %). Handgrip strength improved significantly (MD 2.41 kg; 95 % CI 0.58-4.24; I2 87 %), and LFI showed borderline improvement (MD -0.35; 95 % CI -0.70 to -0.0005; I2 84.4 %). HPHC di

05
CLINICAL STUDY Frontiers in nutrition (2025) PMID: 40901287 ↗
The impact of nutritional intervention and resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy older adults-a comparative analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in nutrition (SMD 0.03). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Compared with resistance training alone, protein supplementation combined with resistance training significantly enhanced muscle strength [Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20,0.69; surface under the cumulative ranking curve (S
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: A growing body of evidence confirms that nutritional supplementation strategies combined with resistance training can enhance muscle strength and mass in older adults. However, the optimal supplementation approach remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different nutritional interventions combined with resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy older adults and determine the optimal strategy. METHODS: A systematic search was performed across three major biomedical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and EMbase) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of nutritional supplementation combined with resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy older adults. A total of 19 eligible RCTs were included. The search covered literature from database inception to April 2025. Two researchers independently screened studies against predefined eligibility criteria and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Stata 18.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Compared with resistance training alone, protein supplementation combined with resistance training significantly enhanced muscle strength [Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20,0.69; surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 98.7%] and muscle mass [Mean Difference (MD) = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.04,0.70],whereas creatine supplementation demonstrated non-significant effects on muscle strength versus training alone (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.35,0.42) but yielded the most pronounced improvement in muscle mass (MD = 2.18, 95%CI: 0.92,3.44; SUCRA = 99.9%), outperforming both protein and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) interventions, with HMB supplementation critically failing to demonstrate significant benefits for muscle strength (SMD = -0.22, 95%CI: -0.57,0.12) or mass outcomes (MD = 0.05, 95%CI: -0.33,0.44). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251026016.

06
CLINICAL STUDY Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) (2025) PMID: 40769018 ↗
Nutrition therapy for physical impairment in critically ill patients: A narrative review of the latest evidence.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). Key conclusion: This approach may enhance the effectiveness of nutritional interventions in improving physical outcomes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Physical impairment has been gaining attention as a fundamental outcome in nutrition therapy for critically ill patients. This review aims to evaluate current evidence and identify knowledge gaps regarding nutrition therapy for physical function and muscle mass, based on 17 systematic reviews developed for the Japanese Critical Care Nutrition Guideline 2024. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ICHUSHI until April 2023, with additional searches up to September 2024. Studies were categorized by nutritional intervention and key findings were summarized. RESULTS: Overfeeding-of both energy and protein-increased adverse outcomes including impaired physical function. Excessive energy restriction also impaired physical outcomes, even during the hyperacute phase. Although adequate energy intake is physiologically necessary during recovery phases, most studies did not report nutritional intake during this period. Protein intake above the standard level helped preserve muscle mass. Nutrition therapy combined with early rehabilitation appears to support physical function. Under the equivalent energy intake, the route and method of administration had minimal impact, but can help ensure adequate delivery. The effects of specific nutrients remain unclear due to limited studies and insufficient or unreported energy intake. Nevertheless, omega-3 fatty acids, beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, and synbiotics showed potential benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Although overfeeding may be harmful during the hyperacute phase, adequate energy intake, at least in the late period of the acute phase and subsequent phases, could play an important role in supporting the recovery of muscle mass and physical function. This approach may enhance the effectiveness of nutritional interventions in improving physical outcomes.

07
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in nutrition (2025) PMID: 40717998 ↗
Effects of different dietary supplements combined with conditioning training on muscle strength, jump performance, sprint speed, and muscle mass in athletes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in nutrition (SMD 0.41). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Protein supplementation appears to be the most effective strategy for increasing muscular strength; β-alanine and creatine both improve jump performance, with β-alanine of
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: As dietary supplements have become integral to meeting athletes' specialised nutritional requirements, research into their effects on performance has intensified. Yet inconsistent findings leave the efficacy of some supplements-most notably branched-chain amino acids and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB)-open to debate. To clarify which products offer the greatest benefit, we undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed at identifying the supplements most effective for athletes, including protein, creatine, β-alanine, HMB, vitamin D, caffeine, and others. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase and SPORTDiscus were searched from database inception to 15 March 2024 for RCTs evaluating the effects of dietary supplements (including but not limited to protein, creatine, β-alanine, HMB, caffeine, and vitamin D) on athletic performance. Risk of bias was appraised with the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A network meta-analysis was performed in R. RESULTS: We included 35 randomized controlled trials comprising 991 athletes who completed strength and conditioning training in conjunction with various dietary supplements or a placebo. The risk of bias assessment indicated that 8.57% of studies were at low risk, 88.57% had some concerns, and 2.86% were at high risk of bias. Protein supplementation yielded the greatest improvement in muscular strength (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.97; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 99.6%; very low-certainty evidence). Both β-alanine (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.10-0.72; SUCRA = 89.0%; moderate-certainty evidence) and creatine (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI 0.07-0.53; SUCRA = 76.06%; moderate-certainty evidence) significantly enhanced jump performance, with β-alanine ranking marginally higher. Creatine also reduced sprint time (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI - 0.68 to -0.16; SUCRA = 94.57%; moderate-certainty evidence). No supplement significantly increased lean body mass. CONCLUSION: Protein supplementation appears to be the most effective strategy for increasing muscular strength; β-alanine and creatine both improve jump performance, with β-alanine of

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Current nutrition reports (2025) PMID: 40560510 ↗
Evidence-Based Supplementation Strategies for Wrestlers: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Current nutrition reports. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Overall, individual studies show some promise for several dietary supplements to alter body mass and body composition, improve exercise recovery and performance, delay fatigue, and modify serum biomarkers; nevertheless, effect sizes were often small, and results were
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Wrestling is a popular combat sport that requires muscular strength, power, agility, and endurance. Weight classes have motivated wrestlers to compete at a lower weight to optimise power-to-weight ratio and performance. To achieve these characteristics, athletes may use dietary supplements, however, their efficacy in wrestlers has not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to systematically review the literature to determine the efficacy of dietary supplements to improve body composition, physiological status, and performance in wrestlers. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ProQuest Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus on the 21st of January 2024 and updated on the 6th of January 2025. Studies were included if the participants were healthy wrestlers ingesting any type of dietary supplement in comparison to a control. Data associated with intervention type and characteristics, target populations, outcomes, and analysis methods were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 24 eligible original articles were included that assessed various supplementation strategies on body composition, exercise performance, and metabolic markers in wrestlers. Individual studies revealed significant effects of sodium citrate, creatine monohydrate, spirulina, green tea and oolong tea extracts, and branched-chain amino acids on body mass or composition. β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB-FA), creatine monohydrate, and iron supplementation improved recovery and may improve exercise performance. Beet-root juice supplementation enhanced muscular strength and balance. BCAA supplementation produced mixed results on muscle damage biomarkers and performance, while sodium citrate, creatine, and spirulina can act as buffering agents. Thyme tea appears to improve antioxidant capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, individual studies show some promise for several dietary supplements to alter body mass and body composition, improve exercise recovery and performance, delay fatigue, and modify serum biomarkers; nevertheless, effect sizes were often small, and results were often mixed. © 2025. The Author(s).

09
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in nutrition (2025) PMID: 40248035 ↗
Effects of oral supplementation of β -hydroxy-β -methylbutyrate on muscle mass and strength in individuals over the age of 50: a meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in nutrition involving n = 1,935 participants (MD 1.56). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: HMB oral supplementation can improve muscle mass, strength, and physical function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) has shown potential in improving muscle protein turnover, which may be important for preventing muscle degradation in aging populations. The aim of this meta-analysis is to clarify the impact of HMB oral supplementation on muscle-related indicators and discover the interaction between dosage and duration. The findings will provide a scientific basis for the use of HMB oral supplementation in the management of muscle attenuation. METHODS: A computer systems-based search for articles of randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EBSCO English databases and China Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI), Wan Fang Chinese databases, was conducted up to October 2023. Data were pooled using weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs were included, involving 1935 participants, all of them were > 50 years old. Results showed a positive impact of HMB oral supplementation in improving muscle mass (appendicular skeletal muscle mass: WMD = 1.56 kg, 95% CI: 0.03-3.09 kg and lean mass: WMD = 0.28 kg, 95% CI: 0.16-0.41 kg), strength (handgrip strength: WMD = 0.54 kg, 95% CI: 0.04-1.04 kg and five-time chair stand test: WMD = -0.73 s, 95% CI: -1.35, -0.11 s), and physical function (gait speed: WMD = 0.06 m/s, 95% CI: 0.01-0.10 m/s). Subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of a dosage of 3 g/d had significant improvement, and the effect of supplementation duration lasting > 12 weeks had significant improvement, and a dosage of 3g/day for more than 12 weeks was recommended. CONCLUSION: HMB oral supplementation can improve muscle mass, strength, and physical function. We recommend to implement supplementation at a dosage of 3 g for a duration exceeding 12 weeks to achieve optimal benefits. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/login, identifier 42024518958.

10
META-ANALYSIS Maturitas (2025) PMID: 39999663 ↗
The effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate supplementation in patients with sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Maturitas involving n = 359 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.048 (SMD 0.32). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Overall, although limited and requiring interpretation with utmost caution, current evidence indicates that HMB supplementation is beneficial for
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the evidence base for the effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation in patients with sarcopenia. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The literature was searched via the PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, WANFANG, CNKI and VIP databases, through 23rd February 2024. The inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trials (RCTs); patients diagnosed with sarcopenia defined according to well-accepted clinical consensus; HMB as an intervention; outcomes on muscle mass and/or muscle strength and/or physical performance. Data extraction was completed by independent pairs of reviewers. Meta-analyses of continuous outcomes were performed on the extracted data. Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) between treatment and control group were used to express intervention effect estimates of HMB for each study. Risk of bias was assessed according to Version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (ROB 2). RESULTS: Of 196 records retrieved and screened, five RCTs met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis, yielding 154, 359 and 359 participants for muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance, respectively. For the overall risk of bias, no studies were graded as "high risk of bias", one (20.0 %) as "some concerns", and four (80.0 %) as "low risk of bias" according to the ROB 2. The overall meta-analysis revealed a beneficial effect on muscle mass and strength, as demonstrated by a higher skeletal muscle mass index (SMD = 0.32; 95 % CI: [0.00,0.64]; Z value =1.98; P = 0.048), along with an elevated handgrip strength (SMD = 0.65; 95 % CI: [0.05, 1.25]; Z value = 2.12; P = 0.034) in the HMB intervention groups compared with the control groups. However, there was no evidence of a benefit on physical performance, assessed by gait speed (SMD = 0.19; 95 % CI: [-0.14, 0.53]; Z value = 1.14; P = 0.255). CONCLUSION: Overall, although limited and requiring interpretation with utmost caution, current evidence indicates that HMB supplementation is beneficial for

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category