NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

L-Carnitine

AMINO ACIDS · Evidence Monograph

L-Carnitine is an evidence-graded amino acids monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (8 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 29,810 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 8 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (1 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 29,810
Reported Trial Dosages 2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 30 weeks · 24 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer
Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime
Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary amino acids clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (21 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (6 RCTs · 1 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (8 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is L-Carnitine & Why Does Form Matter?

L-Carnitine is classified under AMINO ACIDS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (2000 mg/day, 4000 mg/day, 1 g/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for L-Carnitine frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, L-Carnitine acts on pathways governing neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns L-Carnitine an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 8 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (1 double-blind, n = 29,810 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41177307 (2025) — "Effects of carnitine supplementation on glycemic markers in women with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (Carnitine supplementation yields modest but clinically meaningful improvements in fasting glucose, insulin levels, and insulin resistance among overweight and obese women, particularly with higher dosages and longer interventions.) • PMID:40401105 (2025) — "Comparative Efficacy of Nutritional Supplements in Modulating Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in COPD Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis." (CONCLUSION: Nutritional supplements improve lung function and exercise endurance in COPD.) • PMID:40298161 (2025) — "The Effect of the L-Carnitine Supplementation on Obesity Indices: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis." (CONCLUSION: The findings of this umbrella meta-analysis support that supplementation of L-carnitine supplementation can successfully manage weight, BMI, and WC reduction.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 41177307-2.93 (-5.2–-0.65)PMID 404011057.5 (5.1–9.9)PMID 401726121.64 (0.1–3.17)PMID 38594107-0.37 (-0.59–-0.15)PMID 38389158-10.24 (-14.63–-0.86)PMID 38101999-0.5 (-3.79–1.35)-18Null (0)14Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer. Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day · 2 g/day over 12 weeks · 30 weeks · 24 weeks · 6 months. Optimal timing window: AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime (Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for L-Carnitine, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 21 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Diabetes research and clinical practice (2025) PMID: 41177307 ↗
Effects of carnitine supplementation on glycemic markers in women with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Diabetes research and clinical practice (MD -2.93). Key conclusion: Carnitine supplementation yields modest but clinically meaningful improvements in fasting glucose, insulin levels, and insulin resistance among overweight and obese women, particularly with higher dosages and longer interventions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Women with overweight or obesity face heightened risks of insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. L-carnitine, a key mediator of mitochondrial fatty acid transport, has been proposed to improve glycemic regulation, yet evidence in this subgroup remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of carnitine supplementation versus placebo on glycemic markers in overweight or obese women. Major databases were searched through October 2025. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Predefined subgroup analyses explored dose and intervention duration effects. A total of eight studies comprising nine randomized controlled trial (RCT) arms were included. Carnitine supplementation significantly reduced fasting blood sugar (FBS; WMD -2.93 mg/dL, 95 % CI -5.20 to -0.65), fasting insulin (WMD -3.54 μU/mL, 95 % CI -7.00 to -0.07), and HOMA-IR (WMD -0.69, 95 % CI -1.26 to -0.13), but had no significant effect on QUICKI. Subgroup analyses indicated stronger effects at higher doses (≥2000 mg/day) and longer durations (≥12 weeks). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings, with no evidence of publication bias. Carnitine supplementation yields modest but clinically meaningful improvements in fasting glucose, insulin levels, and insulin resistance among overweight and obese women, particularly with higher dosages and longer interventions. These results highlight carnitine's potential as an adjunctive nutritional strategy.

02
META-ANALYSIS International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2025) PMID: 40401105 ↗
Comparative Efficacy of Nutritional Supplements in Modulating Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in COPD Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05 (MD 7.5). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Nutritional supplements improve lung function and exercise endurance in COPD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of nutritional supplements on lung function and exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on nutritional supplements in COPD patients, with the search ending December 31, 2023. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.4 and R 4.2.3. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies with 2481 COPD patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed six supplements significantly improved the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (all p<0.05), with the top three being: Coenzyme Q10+ Creatine [MD=63, 95% CI (36, 90)], L-carnitine [MD=53, 95% CI (24, 82)], and anabolic steroids [MD=44, 95% CI (7.1, 82)]. Four supplements improved FEV1%(all p<0.05): nanocurcumin [MD=13, 95% CI (7.7, 18)], Vitamin D [MD=7.5, 95% CI (5.1, 9.9)], probiotics [MD=7.1, 95% CI (5.2, 9.1)] and BSO [MD=4.9, 95% CI (1.6, 8.3)]. In pairwise comparisons, nanocurcumin outperformed BSO and Probiotics. Nanocurcumin [MD=12, 95% CI (4.6, 19), p<0.05] improved FEV1/FVC, and nitrate [MD=26, 95% CI (9.7, 42), p<0.05] was effective for the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT). Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) products [MD=-1.3, 95% CI (-1.9, -0.67)], melatonin (MLT) [MD=-0.9, 95% CI (-1.6, -0.21)] and Calcitriol [MD=-0.66, 95% CI (-0.93, -0.39)] improved the modified Medical Research Council(mMRC) dyspnea score (all p<0.05), with comparable efficacy among them. CONCLUSION: Nutritional supplements improve lung function and exercise endurance in COPD. Coenzyme Q10+Creatine is most effective for endurance, while Nanocurcumin has the greatest impact on lung function. © 2025 Zeng et al.

03
META-ANALYSIS International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition (2025) PMID: 40298161 ↗
The Effect of the L-Carnitine Supplementation on Obesity Indices: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition involving n = 16,352 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.005. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The findings of this umbrella meta-analysis support that supplementation of L-carnitine supplementation can successfully manage weight, BMI, and WC reduction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: Obesity, one of the most frequent health risks, represents a global public health problem. The potential impact of L-carnitine, a vital nutrient for energy metabolism, on weight loss is worth considering. However, given the inconclusive results from recent meta-analyses on L-carnitine, we conducted an umbrella meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and controlled trials to evaluate the effect of L-carnitine on anthropometric indices. METHODS: Data synthesis: A comprehensive search approach using the relevant keywords was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus databases, and Google Scholar up to March 2023. Meta-analyses published in English that provided quantitative statistical analyses regarding the effects of L-carnitine on body weight, waist circumference (WC), and body mass index (BMI) were included. A random-effects model and subgroup analysis were performed based on the L-carnitine dosage and study population. RESULTS: A total of 16,352 participants were included. Intervention durations ranged from 8 to 30 weeks, with L-carnitine dosages ranging between 150 and 4000 mg/day. The pooled results of the eight included meta-analyses indicated that L-carnitine supplementation can significantly decrease weight (effect size (ES) = -1.11; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): -1.90, -0.33, p = 0.005; I2 = 90.6%, p < 0.001), BMI (ES = -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61, -0.04, p = 0.026; I2 = 89.8%, p < 0.001), and WC (ES = -1.34; 95% CI: -1.83, -0.85, p < 0.001; I2 = 00.0%, p = 0.442). CONCLUSION: The findings of this umbrella meta-analysis support that supplementation of L-carnitine supplementation can successfully manage weight, BMI, and WC reduction. Therefore, L-carnitine might help treat obesity. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42022307951. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

04
META-ANALYSIS International urology and nephrology (2025) PMID: 40172612 ↗
Safety and efficacy of L-carnitine supplementation in improving cardiac function of hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in International urology and nephrology involving n = 426 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04 (MD 1.64). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: L-carnitine supplementation significantly improves cardiac function, particularly systolic function (LVEF) in hemodialysis patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Heart failure is a significant complication among patients undergoing hemodialysis, often associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction. L-carnitine, crucial for fatty acid metabolism, has shown promise in improving cardiac function. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of L-carnitine supplementation in improving cardiac function in hemodialysis patients. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE was conducted up to October 3, 2024, to identify relevant studies. The trials assessing the effects of L-carnitine on echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and diastolic function were included. A random-effects model was applied to pool data, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were included in the systematic review, with 7 studies involving 426 participants being meta-analyzed. L-carnitine supplementation significantly improved LVEF (MD = 1.64, 95% CI 0.10-3.17, p = 0.04), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 37%). However, no significant changes were observed for LVMI (MD = -3.19, p = 0.60) or diastolic markers (E/A ratio MD = -0.13, p = 0.47; E/e ratio MD = -0.35, p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: L-carnitine supplementation significantly improves cardiac function, particularly systolic function (LVEF) in hemodialysis patients. However, its effects on LVMI and markers of diastolic function are inconclusive. Future large-scale trials are warranted to further elucidate its role in cardiac function among this population. © 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

05
META-ANALYSIS European journal of medical research (2024) PMID: 39367436 ↗
The supplementation of L-carnitine in critically ill patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of medical research involving n = 356 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.21 (RR 0.65). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The use of L-carnitine was not found to be significantly correlated with 28-day or 12-month mortality in patients with sepsis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: The evidence suggests that L-carnitine may reduce mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. However, the conclusions of different studies are inconsistent. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of L-carnitine compliance on mortality in patients with sepsis. METHODS: A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted on 1 June 2024. The risk ratio (RR) was pooled with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data. The publications were subjected to a review in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). This study has been registered with INPLASY (number INPLASY202460086). RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were included in four randomized controlled trials. The results indicated that L-carnitine supplementation was not associated with 28-day mortality in sepsis patients (RR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.33-1.28; I2 = 70%; P = 0.21). And there was no significant effect on 12-month mortality (RR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.47-1.11; I2 = 0%; P = 0.14) compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The use of L-carnitine was not found to be significantly correlated with 28-day or 12-month mortality in patients with sepsis. © 2024. The Author(s).

06
META-ANALYSIS The journal of sexual medicine (2024) PMID: 39279185 ↗
Nutraceutical interventions for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in The journal of sexual medicine involving n = 1,000 participants. Key conclusion: On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Although nutraceutical-based treatments are often offered for erectile dysfunction (ED), their efficacy remains doubtful, and the choice of one substance over the other is challenged by the dearth of head-to-head comparative studies. AIM: We aimed to compare the efficacy of available nutraceutical interventions, alone or in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), in improving erectile function in men with ED through a network meta-analysis (NMA), which incorporates direct and indirect evidence into one model thus generating a hierarchy of effectiveness. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of any nutraceutical regimen in improving erectile function when compared to each other, placebo, and/or PDE5i in men with ED. Data were included in a random-effects NMA, where efficacy of treatments was ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Two NMAs were also conducted separately for organic and non-organic ED. Reciprocal comparisons between all treatments were analyzed by league tables. OUTCOMES: The main outcome was the standardized mean difference in the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 or IIEF-6. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs provided information on 1000 men with ED. In the overall NMA, compared to placebo, the combination propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) + acetyl L-carnitine (ALC) + Sildenafil was associated with the highest SUCRA (97%) in improving erectile function score, followed by L-Arginine + Tadalafil (84%), Sildenafil (79%), Tadalafil (72%), and L-Arginine (52%). No other treatment regimen showed efficacy with statistical significance. In patients with organic ED, the efficacy of Sildenafil and Tadalafil was significantly improved by PLC + ALC and L-Arginine, respectively. On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This NMA contributes valuable insights into the potential of nutraceutical interventions for ED. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: We employed strict inclusion criteria relat

07
META-ANALYSIS Clinical therapeutics (2024) PMID: 38594107 ↗
The Effects of L-Carnitine Supplementation on Weight Loss, Glycemic Control, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical therapeutics involving n = 13 participants (MD -0.37). Key conclusion: IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation resulted in a small reduction in serum lipids and plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: L-carnitine supplementation has been recommended to improve cardiometabolic health markers in diabetic patients. Our purpose was to assess the dose-dependent effects of l-carnitine supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until May 2022 for randomized controlled trials that examined the impact of l-carnitine supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with type 2 diabetes. The mean difference (MD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated utilizing a random-effects model. Nonlinear dose-response associations were modeled with restricted cubic splines. The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. FINDINGS: Twenty-one randomized trials with 2041 patients with type 2 diabetes were included. We found that every 1 g/d supplementation with l-carnitine significantly reduced body mass index (MD: -0.37 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.59, -0.15; I2 =93%, n=13, GRADE=low), HbA1c (MD: -0.16%, 95% CI: -0.32, -0.01; I2 = 94%, n = 18, GRADE = moderate), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: -0.11 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.05; I2 = 91%, n = 11, GRADE = high). There were also reductions in serum triglycerides (MD: 0.07 mmol/L), total cholesterol (MD: -0.13 mmol/L), and fasting plasma glucose (MD: -0.17 mmol/L). A U-shaped effect was demonstrated for body mass index, with the largest reduction at 2 g/d. A linear reduction was seen for serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose up to l-carnitine supplementation of 4 g/d. IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation resulted in a small reduction in serum lipids and plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, due to high statistical heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted very cautiously.

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Molecular nutrition & food research (2024) PMID: 38389158 ↗
Effect of l-Carnitine Supplementation on Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Molecular nutrition & food research involving n = 619 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03 (MD -10.24). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: In patients with OA, l-carnitine effectively decreases clinical signs and symptoms, inflammatory markers, pain, and stiffness indicators, and significantly improves WOMAC and VAS scores.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

SCOPE: Comprehensive assessment of l-carnitine's safety and effectiveness in reducing inflammatory markers in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Journal articles on l-carnitine for OA are gathered using computer searches of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The kind of literature that is found is restricted to clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Cochrane Handbook risk of bias assessment tool RevMan 5.4 software is used to conduct a meta-analysis. The systematic assessment comprises eight trials totaling 619 patients; the included studies' quality is mediocre. The study's findings demonstrate that OA patients' Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) function improves and that treatment efficacy outperforms that of the control group (mean difference [MD] = -7.75, 95% CI [-14.63, -0.86]; Z = 2.21; p = 0.03), WOMAC total (MD = -10.24, 95% CI [-18.97, -1.51]; Z = 2.30; p = 0.02), and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain (MD = -14.01, 95% CI [-16.16, -11.85]; Z = 12.74; p < 0.00001). The studies that are methodically reviewed also discover heterogeneity, which may have resulted from the created pooled data and requires more analysis. CONCLUSION: In patients with OA, l-carnitine effectively decreases clinical signs and symptoms, inflammatory markers, pain, and stiffness indicators, and significantly improves WOMAC and VAS scores. © 2024 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.

09
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024) PMID: 38345088 ↗
Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 7,920 participants (RR 0.92). Key conclusion: Adequate nutrient intake can reduce the risk factor of malnutrition and promote wound healing in existing pressure ulcers.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are localized injuries to the skin or the underlying tissue, or both, and are common in older and immobile people, people with diabetes, vascular disease, or malnutrition, as well as those who require intensive or palliative care. People with pressure ulcers often suffer from severe pain and exhibit social avoidance behaviours. The prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers involves strategies to optimize hydration, circulation, and nutrition. Adequate nutrient intake can reduce the risk factor of malnutrition and promote wound healing in existing pressure ulcers. However, it is unclear which nutrients help prevent and treat pressure ulcers. This is an update of an earlier Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of nutritional interventions (special diets, supplements) for preventing and treating pressure ulcers in people with or without existing pressure ulcers compared to standard diet or other nutritional interventions. SEARCH METHODS: We used extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search was in May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in people with or without existing pressure ulcers, that compared nutritional interventions aimed at preventing or treating pressure ulcers with standard diet or other types of nutritional interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome for prevention studies was the proportion of participants who developed new (incident) pressure ulcers. For treatment studies, our primary outcomes were time to complete pressure ulcer healing, number of people with healed pressure ulcers, size and depth of pressure ulcers, and rate of pressure ulcer healing. Secondary outcomes were side effects, costs, health-related quality of life and acceptability. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included 33 RCTs with 7920 participants. Data for meta-analysis were available from 6993 participants. Pressure ulcer prevention Eleven studies (with 12 arms) compared six types of nutritional interventions for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Compared to standard diet,

10
META-ANALYSIS Clinical therapeutics (2024) PMID: 38101999 ↗
The Effects of L-Carnitine Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical therapeutics involving n = 1,412 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.352 (MD -0.5). Key conclusion: IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation in adults did not significantly affect BP.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Hypertension stands as a prominent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, making it of utmost importance to address. Studies have shown that L-carnitine supplementation may lower blood pressure (BP) parameters in different populations. Therefore, we have conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of published Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), including the most recent articles on the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on BP. METHODS: PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane databases, and Scopus were used to collect RCT studies published up to October 2022 without limitations in language. Inclusion criteria were adult participants and recipients of L-carnitine in oral supplemental forms. The funnel plot test, Begg's test, and Egger's test were used to examine publication bias. FINDINGS: After the search strategy, 22 RCTs (n = 1412) with 24 effect sizes fulfilled the criteria. It was found L-Carnitine supplementation did not have a significant effect on systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mm Hg) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.22 mm Hg, 95% CI: -3.79, 1.35; P = 0.352; I2 = 85.0%, P < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) (WMD = -0.50 mm Hg, 95% CI: -1.49, 0.48; P = 0.318; I2 = 43.4%, P = 0.021) in the pooled analysis. Subgroup analyses have shown that L-carnitine supplementation had no lowering effect on SBP in any subgroup. However, there was a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure in participants with a baseline body mass index >30 kg/m2 (WMD = -1.59 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.11, -0.06; P = 0.041; I2 = 41.3%, P = 0.164). There was a significant nonlinear relationship between the duration of L-carnitine intervention and changes in SBP (coefficients = -6.83, P = 0.045). IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation in adults did not significantly affect BP. But anyway, more studies should be done in this field on different individuals.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category