NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

L-Leucine

AMINO ACIDS · Evidence Monograph

L-Leucine is an evidence-graded amino acids monograph evaluated across 25 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (0 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 8,017 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) Moderate (3.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 25 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 0 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (7 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 8,017
Reported Trial Dosages 300 mg · 5g · 4 g/day
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 18 months · 12 months
Reading Time ~13 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover (supported by 25 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE Moderate).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (300 mg · 5g · 4 g/day) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer
Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime
Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
weight (PubMed clinical endpoint)
gut (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is L-Leucine & Why Does Form Matter?

L-Leucine is classified under AMINO ACIDS and has been investigated across 25 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (300 mg, 5g, 4 g/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for L-Leucine frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, L-Leucine acts on pathways governing neurotransmitter precursor supply, nitric oxide synthesis, and structural protein turnover. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns L-Leucine an overall evidence rating of GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) based on 25 PubMed studies: 0 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (7 double-blind, n = 8,017 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:38345088 (2024) — "Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers." (Adequate nutrient intake can reduce the risk factor of malnutrition and promote wound healing in existing pressure ulcers.) • PMID:41754131 (2026) — "Acute L-Leucine Supplementation and Sprint Exercise Elicit Distinct Appetite and Inflammatory Responses in Persons with Overweight: A Randomized, Counterbalanced, and Crossover Design Study." (Sprint exercise had a consistent acute anorexic effect, while isolated L-leucine decreased SPA, but their impact on SPS and food intake is not clear (FAPESP grants: 2020/09936-2 and 2021/03601-1).) • PMID:41365468 (2026) — "Effects of Combined Intragastric Administration of Quinine with L-Leucine or L-Isoleucine on the Glycemic Response to, and Gastric Emptying of, a Mixed-Nutrient Drink in Healthy Males." (CONCLUSIONS: In healthy males, although combining QHCl with Leu or Ile, in the doses used, did not enhance their glucose-lowering effects, even small changes in the early gastric emptying rate and insulin stimulation appear to contribute to postprandial glucose-lowering.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Pharmaceutical-Grade Free-Form L-Enantiomer. Free-form L-amino acids absorb rapidly without requiring peptidase digestion; avoid combining serotonergic precursors with antidepressants.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 300 mg · 5g · 4 g/day · 4 g over 12 weeks · 18 months · 12 months · 8 weeks. Optimal timing window: AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime (Separating targeted amino acids from heavy protein meals reduces neutral amino acid transporter competition.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Predictable target response within 1–4 weeks without GI distress or headache.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If palpitations, headache, or nausea occur, lower the single-serving dose.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for L-Leucine, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 08:00 or 30–60 Min Before Target Activity / Bedtime) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (300 mg · 5g · 4 g/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (25 Studies) · 10 Quantitative Analyses

01
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024) PMID: 38345088 ↗
Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 7,920 participants (RR 0.92). Key conclusion: Adequate nutrient intake can reduce the risk factor of malnutrition and promote wound healing in existing pressure ulcers.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are localized injuries to the skin or the underlying tissue, or both, and are common in older and immobile people, people with diabetes, vascular disease, or malnutrition, as well as those who require intensive or palliative care. People with pressure ulcers often suffer from severe pain and exhibit social avoidance behaviours. The prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers involves strategies to optimize hydration, circulation, and nutrition. Adequate nutrient intake can reduce the risk factor of malnutrition and promote wound healing in existing pressure ulcers. However, it is unclear which nutrients help prevent and treat pressure ulcers. This is an update of an earlier Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of nutritional interventions (special diets, supplements) for preventing and treating pressure ulcers in people with or without existing pressure ulcers compared to standard diet or other nutritional interventions. SEARCH METHODS: We used extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search was in May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in people with or without existing pressure ulcers, that compared nutritional interventions aimed at preventing or treating pressure ulcers with standard diet or other types of nutritional interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome for prevention studies was the proportion of participants who developed new (incident) pressure ulcers. For treatment studies, our primary outcomes were time to complete pressure ulcer healing, number of people with healed pressure ulcers, size and depth of pressure ulcers, and rate of pressure ulcer healing. Secondary outcomes were side effects, costs, health-related quality of life and acceptability. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included 33 RCTs with 7920 participants. Data for meta-analysis were available from 6993 participants. Pressure ulcer prevention Eleven studies (with 12 arms) compared six types of nutritional interventions for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Compared to standard diet,

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2026) PMID: 41754131 ↗
Acute L-Leucine Supplementation and Sprint Exercise Elicit Distinct Appetite and Inflammatory Responses in Persons with Overweight: A Randomized, Counterbalanced, and Crossover Design Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Sprint exercise had a consistent acute anorexic effect, while isolated L-leucine decreased SPA, but their impact on SPS and food intake is not clear (FAPESP grants: 2020/09936-2 and 2021/03601-1).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to evaluate the acute effect of L-leucine supplementation and high-intensity sprint exercise on appetite-controlling neuropeptides and their association with the subjective perception of appetite (SPA), satiety (SPS), food intake, and inflammatory response in overweight participants. METHODS: In a double-masked, randomized, counterbalanced, and crossover design, 12 sedentary overweight adult men performed four experiments: (1) exercise and L-leucine (EX-Leu), (2) exercise and placebo (EX-PLA), (3) L-leucine without exercise (SED-Leu), and (4) placebo without exercise (SED-PLA). The supplementation consisted of three daily doses of 70 mg/kg body weight of L-leucine or placebo (on the day of exercise and one day after). During the experiments, we recorded the food intake, SPA, and SPS, and evaluated the neuropeptides (GLP-1, PYY, CCK, and ghrelin) and cytokines (IL1-beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α) in peripheral blood. The acute exercise trial consisted of four sets of 30 sec cycle ergometer sprint exercises. RESULTS: EX-Leu, EX-PLA, and SED-Leu decreased SPA, compared to SED-PLA; only EX-PLA improved SPS; EX-PLA and EX-Leu reduced food intake. GLP-1 decreased in the EX-PLA trial compared to SED-Leu. IL-6 and IL1-β levels increased in the EX-Leu trial compared to SED-PLA. An anti-inflammatory profile was identified in the EX-PLA trial compared to the other trials. Both neuropeptides (increased) and cytokines (a pro-inflammatory profile) were associated with changes in SPA, SPS, and food intake. CONCLUSIONS: The acute inflammatory balance induced by EX-Leu seems to improve appetite control. Sprint exercise had a consistent acute anorexic effect, while isolated L-leucine decreased SPA, but their impact on SPS and food intake is not clear (FAPESP grants: 2020/09936-2 and 2021/03601-1).

03
CLINICAL STUDY The Journal of nutrition (2026) PMID: 41365468 ↗
Effects of Combined Intragastric Administration of Quinine with L-Leucine or L-Isoleucine on the Glycemic Response to, and Gastric Emptying of, a Mixed-Nutrient Drink in Healthy Males.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Journal of nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: In healthy males, although combining QHCl with Leu or Ile, in the doses used, did not enhance their glucose-lowering effects, even small changes in the early gastric emptying rate and insulin stimulation appear to contribute to postprandial glucose-lowering.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The amino acids, L-leucine (Leu) and L-isoleucine (Ile), and the bitter substance, quinine, reduce postprandial glucose, stimulate insulin, and/or slow gastric emptying. Whether combining these stimuli can enhance these effects is not known. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether combined intragastric administration of quinine with Leu or Ile, each in submaximal dose, would reduce the plasma glucose response to a mixed-nutrient drink more than each compound individually, associated with greater insulin stimulation and/or slowing of gastric emptying. METHODS: Fifteen healthy, lean males were recruited for each of the 2 study parts. They received on 4 separate occasions, 1) 300 mg quinine hydrochloride ("QHCl"), 2) 5g ("Leu"; part A) or 5g ("Ile"; part B), 3) combination of 1) + 2) ("QHCl + Leu" or "QHCl + Ile"), or 4) control intragastrically, in a randomized, double-blind fashion. At t = -60 min, either QHCl or control was administered, and 30 min later (at t = -30 min), amino acid or control was administered. At t = -1 min, participants consumed a mixed-nutrient drink labeled with sodium acetate-1-13C for measurement of gastric emptying by breath test. Plasma glucose and insulin were measured at baseline (i.e. t = -60 min), for 60 min before the drink, and for 180 min postdrink. Breath samples were collected at baseline and postdrink, for subsequent analysis of 13CO2. RESULTS: QHCl, QHCl + Leu, and QHCl + Ile delayed the early rise in plasma glucose compared with control, Leu, and Ile (all P < 0.05). QHCl + Leu and QHCl + Ile stimulated insulin compared with QHCl, Leu, and control (all P < 0.05), but did not affect gastric emptying. The early glucose response [area under the curve (AUC), t = 0‒30 min (AUC0‒30 min)] was related directly to early gastric emptying (AUC0‒30 min) (R > 0.41, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy males, although combining QHCl with Leu or Ile, in the doses used, did not enhance their glucose-lowering effects, even small changes in the early gastric emptying rate and insulin stimulation appear to contribute to postprandial glucose-lowering. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05720390 and NCT05682339.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Neurology (2025) PMID: 40513057 ↗
Disease-Modifying, Neuroprotective Effect of N-Acetyl-l-Leucine in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Niemann-Pick Disease Type C.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Neurology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.009. Key conclusion: DISCUSSION: Treatment with NALL was associated with a significant reduction in NPC disease progression after 12 and 18 months, demonstrating a disease-modifying, neuroprotective effect.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Comment in doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213857. Comment in Neurology. 105:e213857. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: N-acetyl-l-leucine (NALL) has been established to improve the neurologic manifestations of Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) after 12 weeks in a placebo-controlled trial. In the open-label extension phase (EP) follow-up, data were obtained after 12 and 18 months to evaluate the long-term effects of NALL for NPC. METHODS: This is an ongoing, multinational, multicenter EP. Patients with a genetic diagnosis of NPC aged 4 years or older who completed the placebo-controlled trial were eligible to continue in the EP and receive orally administered NALL 2-3 times per day in 3 tiers of weight-based dosing. The primary end point is the modified 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPC-CSS) (range 0-25 points; lower score representing better neurologic status); data from the EP cohort are compared with the expected annual trajectory of decline (i.e., disease progression) established in natural history studies. Analyses are also performed on exploratory end points, including the 15-domain and 4-domain NPC-CSSs and the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients aged 5-67 years (45.3% female, 54.7% male) were enrolled in the EP. After 12 months, the mean (±SD) change from baseline on the 5-domain NPC-CSS was -0.27 (±2.42) with NALL vs +1.5 (±3.16) in the historical cohort (95% CI -3.05 to -0.48; p = 0.009), corresponding to a 118% reduction in annual disease progression. After 18 months, the mean (±SD) change was +0.05 (±2.95) with NALL vs +2.25 (±4.74) in the historical cohort (95% CI -4.06 to -0.35; p = 0.023). The 15-domain and 4-domain NPC-CSSs were consistent with the 5-domain NPC-CSS. The improvements in neurologic manifestations demonstrated in the placebo-controlled trial on the primary SARA end point were sustained over the long-term follow-up. NALL was well tolerated, and no treatment-related adverse events or serious reactions occurred. DISCUSSION: Treatment with NALL was associated with a significant reduction in NPC disease progression after 12 and 18 months, demonstrating a disease-modifying, neuroprotective effect.

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The American journal of clinical nutrition (2025) PMID: 39978467 ↗
Acute decrease in the plasma tryptophan-to-large-neutral-amino-acids ratio attenuates the effects of L-tryptophan on gut hormones and energy intake in healthy males: a randomized, cross-over, exploratory trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The American journal of clinical nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Acute reduction in the Trp/LNAAs ratio appears to be associated with a diminished capacity of Trp to stimulate CCK and GLP-1 and suppress energy intake.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: L-tryptophan ("Trp") and L-leucine ("Leu"), when administered intraduodenally, increase plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and stimulate pyloric pressures, which all slow gastric emptying and suppress subsequent energy intake. The circulating Trp-to-large-neutral-amino-acids ("Trp/LNAAs") ratio is also inversely related to energy intake. OBJECTIVES: This exploratory study characterized the impact of standardized changes in the plasma Trp/LNAAs ratio, achieved by combining a fixed-load intraduodenal infusion of Trp with increasing loads of Leu, on the appetite-inhibitory effects of enteral Trp. METHODS: Twelve males of normal weight [mean ± standard deviation; age: 23 ± 2 y; body mass index (in kg/m2: 23±1)], received on 4 separate occasions, 90-min iso-osmotic intraduodenal infusions of 1) isotonic 0.9% saline ("control"), 2) Trp (0.15 kcal/min; "Trp"), 3) Trp + Leu (0.22 kcal/min; "Trp+Leu-0.22"), or 4) Trp + Leu (0.45 kcal/min; "Trp+Leu-0.45"), in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Immediately postinfusion ad-libitum energy intake was quantified. Plasma CCK, GLP-1, amino acid concentrations, and antropyloroduodenal pressures were measured throughout. RESULTS: Although there was a transient stimulation of CCK and GLP-1 by Trp + Leu - 0.45 (at t = 15 min), only Trp led to a sustained increase in plasma CCK (P = 0.04) and GLP-1 (P = 0.009) from t = 60-90 min, and stimulated pyloric pressures (P = 0.01), compared with control. Only Trp reduced energy intake [kcal (mean ± standard error of the mean); control: 1085 ± 49, Trp: 881 ± 75, Trp + Leu - 0.22: 963 ± 57, Trp + Leu - 0.45: 932 ± 60] compared with control (P = 0.008). The Trp/LNAAs ratio was dose-dependently decreased by Trp + Leu - 0.22 and Trp + Leu - 0.45, compared with Trp (all P = 0.001), and energy intake correlated inversely with the Trp/LNAAs ratio (R = -0.38; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Acute reduction in the Trp/LNAAs ratio appears to be associated with a diminished capacity of Trp to stimulate CCK and GLP-1 and suppress energy intake. Although these observations should be interpreted with caution given the exploratory nature of the study, they atte

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) European journal of paediatric neurology (2024) PMID: 38669738 ↗
Efficacy and safety of N-acetyl-L-leucine in patients with ataxia telangiectasia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of paediatric neurology involving n = 20 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this was the first placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial exploring NALL's potential effects for treating AT.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) is an autosomal recessive multisystem disorder. Most patients have progressive cerebellar ataxia, oculocutaneous telangiectasia, frequent pulmonary infection, and an increased risk of malignancies. Although N-acetyl-dl-leucine (ADLL) has shown some efficacy in patients with AT, its more pharmacologically active enantiomer, N-acetyl-l-leucine (NALL), has just recently been investigated in ataxic individuals. The current study assessed the efficacy of NALL in patients with AT. METHODS: This 2 × 2 crossover, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 20 patients with AT. After excluding four patients, 16 subjects (eight females, eight males; mean age 9.8 ± 3.5 years) with a definitive genetic diagnosis of AT were randomly assigned to one of two study groups, with one group receiving 1-4 g/day NALL or a placebo for six weeks. Subjects then had a 4-week washout before crossing over to the other treatment for an additional six weeks. The Spinocerebellar Ataxia Functional Index (SCAFI) and the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score assessed patients' motor function. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated by a specialist using the PedsQL questionnaire. Fasting blood samples were taken from all subjects before and after each intervention to determine potential side effects. RESULTS: Although patients' nausea and constipation were improved, the results failed to reveal any significant benefits of NALL treatment on ataxia symptoms. NALL treatment had no significant effects on SARA, SCAFI-9HPT (9-hole peg test) nondominant, SCAFI-9HPT dominant, or SCAFI-8WMT (8 m walking time) (p > 0.05). Our patient's Physical Health score in Child self-report and Parent proxy-report did not significantly change in the treatment group compared to the placebo (p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant changes in energy and macronutrient intake after NALL treatment. None of the volunteers reported serious or moderate side effects. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this was the first placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial exploring NALL's potential effects for treating AT. Despite improvements in some sy

07
CLINICAL STUDY The New England journal of medicine (2024) PMID: 38294974 ↗
Trial of N-Acetyl-l-Leucine in Niemann-Pick Disease Type C.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The New England journal of medicine involving n = 60 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -1.28). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with Niemann-Pick disease type
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Niemann-Pick disease type C is a rare lysosomal storage disorder. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of N-acetyl-l-leucine (NALL), an agent that potentially ameliorates lysosomal and metabolic dysfunction, for the treatment of Niemann-Pick disease type C. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, we randomly assigned patients 4 years of age or older with genetically confirmed Niemann-Pick disease type C in a 1:1 ratio to receive NALL for 12 weeks, followed by placebo for 12 weeks, or to receive placebo for 12 weeks, followed by NALL for 12 weeks. NALL or matching placebo was administered orally two to three times per day, with patients 4 to 12 years of age receiving weight-based doses (2 to 4 g per day) and those 13 years of age or older receiving a dose of 4 g per day. The primary end point was the total score on the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA; range, 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating better neurologic status). Secondary end points included scores on the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement, the Spinocerebellar Ataxia Functional Index, and the Modified Disability Rating Scale. Crossover data from the two 12-week periods in each group were included in the comparisons of NALL with placebo. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients 5 to 67 years of age were enrolled. The mean baseline SARA total scores used in the primary analysis were 15.88 before receipt of the first dose of NALL (60 patients) and 15.68 before receipt of the first dose of placebo (59 patients; 1 patient never received placebo). The mean (±SD) change from baseline in the SARA total score was -1.97±2.43 points after 12 weeks of receiving NALL and -0.60±2.39 points after 12 weeks of receiving placebo (least-squares mean difference, -1.28 points; 95% confidence interval, -1.91 to -0.65; P<0.001). The results for the secondary end points were generally supportive of the findings in the primary analysis, but these were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. The incidence of adverse events was similar with NALL and placebo, and no treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with Niemann-Pick disease type

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2024) PMID: 38257103 ↗
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Leucine-Supplement Combined with Nutritional Counseling on Body Composition in Mix Cancer Older Men.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: However, the fact that most men are non-cachectic or pre-cachectic is not clear if the increase in muscle mass was due to a high intake of leucine, since no differ
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and metabolic alterations of cancer cachexia are often associated with negative weight loss and muscle mass wasting. In this sense, protein supplementation can be a strategy to help counteract the loss and/or maintenance of mass in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of leucine supplementation on body composition in outpatients with gastrointestinal tract cancer. METHODS: It was a randomized, blinded, controlled, parallel trial, performed in male patients with a cancer diagnosis of the gastrointestinal tract and appendix organs undergoing chemotherapy. All the patients were allocated to one of the protocol groups: L-leucine supplement or the control group, during 8 weeks of intervention. We evaluated the body composition through bioelectrical impedance analysis, the cancer cachexia classification, and the diet intake before and after the intervention protocol. The intention-to-treat approach was performed to predict the missing values for all patients who provide any observation data. RESULTS: The patients were an average age of 65.11 ± 7.50 years old. In the body composition analysis with patients who finished all the supplementation, we observed a significant gain in body weight (61.79.9 ± 9.02 versus 64.06 ± 9.45, p = 0.01), ASMM (7.64 ± 1.24 versus 7.81 ± 1.20, p = 0.02) in the Leucine group, whereas patients in the control did not present significant variation in these parameters. There was no significant intergroup difference. While in the analysis included the patients with intention-to-treat, we found a significant increase in body weight (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.01), FFM (p = 0.03), and ASMM (p = 0.01) in the Leucine group. No significant intergroup differences. These results also similar among cachectic patients. CONCLUSION: A balanced diet enriched with free-Leucine supplementation was able to promotes gains in body weight and lean mass in older men diagnosticated with gastrointestinal and appendix organs of digestion cancer after 8 weeks. However, the fact that most men are non-cachectic or pre-cachectic is not clear if the increase in muscle mass was due to a high intake of leucine, since no differ

09
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of strength and conditioning research (2024) PMID: 38088883 ↗
Effects of L-Leucine Supplementation and Resistance Training on Adipokine Markers in Untrained Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of strength and conditioning research involving n = 17 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03. Key conclusion: These decreases may be due to both adipokines possible relationship with VAT area.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Chapman-Lopez, TJ, Funderburk, LK, Heileson, JL, Wilburn, DT, Koutakis, P, Gallucci, AR, and Forsse, JS. Effects of L-leucine supplementation and resistance training on adipokine markers in untrained perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): 526-532, 2024-This study examined the effects of supplementing 5 g of leucine compared with a placebo during a 10-week resistance training program on body composition parameters and adipokine concentrations in untrained, perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Thirty-five women were randomly assigned to 2 groups-leucine (LEU, n = 17) and placebo (PLC, n = 18)-in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Each group consumed the supplement or placebo every day and completed a resistance training program for 10 weeks. Using 3-day food records, a diet was assessed before the intervention and after its cessation. Body composition was assessed preintervention and postintervention using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Moreover, the concentrations of adipokines, such as adiponectin, visfatin, leptin, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), were assessed preintervention and postintervention. Both groups showed an increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area ( p = 0.030) and fat-free mass (FFM; p = 0.023). There were significant group differences in concentrations of visfatin ( p = 0.020) and leptin ( p = 0.038) between the PLC and LEU groups. Visfatin displayed higher concentrations in the PLC group and leptin displayed higher concentrations in the LEU group. In addition, there were significant decreases in adiponectin concentrations for both groups (LEU: 652 ± 513 to 292 ± 447 pg·ml -1 ; PLC: 584 ± 572 to 245 ± 356 pg·ml -1 , p = 0.002) and MCP-1 only decreased in the PLC group (253 ± 119 to 206 ± 106 pg·ml -1 , p = 0.004). There were significant decreases in adiponectin concentrations in both groups and a decrease in MCP-1 concentrations in the PLC group. These decreases may be due to both adipokines possible relationship with VAT area. However, it is not known whether leucine has underlying properties that hinder changes in MCP-1 concentrations.

10
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of clinical nutrition (2024) PMID: 37923932 ↗
The impact of leucine supplementation on body composition and glucose tolerance following energy restriction: an 8-week RCT in adults at risk of the metabolic syndrome.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of clinical nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.045. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Short-term leucine supplementation during energy restriction resulted in a greater preservation of FFM and LTM particularly in men, but did not impact glucose metabolism.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: L-Leucine (Leu) supplementation may benefit fat-free mass (FFM) per se and glucose metabolism. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether Leu supplementation during energy restriction blunted the loss of FFM, enhanced the loss of fat mass (FM) and improved glucose tolerance. DESIGN: Thirty-seven adults, aged 20-65 years, with increased waist circumference and at least one other metabolic syndrome (MetS) component, were selected. We employed a two-arm parallel, double blind, randomized control trial (RCT) design. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group (leucine - 3 g/d) or placebo (lactose - 2.67 g/d), while following an individualised energy restricted diet for an 8-week period. Detailed body composition (DEXA), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin and components of MetS were measured before and after the trial. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) assessed the effect of Leu on an intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. Bootstrapping method with 1000 bootstrap samples was used to derive parameter estimates, standard errors, p-values, and 95% confidence intervals for all outcomes. RESULTS: Adjusted for baseline values and other covariates, FFM (p = 0.045) and lean tissue mass (LTM) (p = 0.050) were significantly higher following Leu. These outcomes were modified by a significant treatment x sex interaction that indicated Leu had the greater effect in men. However, on adjustment for body composition changes, there was no difference in insulin sensitivity, oral glucose tolerance, or change in MetS components following Leu. CONCLUSION: Short-term leucine supplementation during energy restriction resulted in a greater preservation of FFM and LTM particularly in men, but did not impact glucose metabolism. © 2023. The Author(s).

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category