NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lutein (20mg)

EYE HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

Lutein (20mg) is an evidence-graded eye health monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (3 meta-analyses, 6 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 4,627 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 3 Meta · 6 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 9 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 4,627
Reported Trial Dosages 3 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 42 weeks · 32 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (3 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary eye health clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (16 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (9 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (3 meta-analyses · 6 reviews)
01

What Is Lutein (20mg) & Why Does Form Matter?

Lutein (20mg) is classified under EYE HEALTH and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (3 mg/day, 20 mg/day, 2,500 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lutein (20mg) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (9 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lutein (20mg) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lutein (20mg) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 3 meta-analyses, 6 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 4,627 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41515122 (2025) — "Nutritional Supplementation for Myopia Prevention and Control: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials." (CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional supplementation may improve visual function and retinal antioxidant status but lacks strong evidence for slowing myopia progression.) • PMID:40522203 (2025) — "Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis." (However, it is not known whether these treatments offer significant long-term advantages over observation or each other.) • PMID:40292760 (2025) — "Lutein and zeaxanthin for reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants." (OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 4134262410.08 (3.79–24.07)PMID 408765380.17 (0.05–0.21)PMID 42041177-0.01 (-0.02–-0)-3.6Null (0)28Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 3 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g · 3 g/day over 12 weeks · 42 weeks · 32 weeks · 1 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Lutein (20mg), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (3 mg/day · 20 mg/day · 2,500 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 16 Quantitative Analyses

01
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Nutrients (2025) PMID: 41515122 ↗
Nutritional Supplementation for Myopia Prevention and Control: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional supplementation may improve visual function and retinal antioxidant status but lacks strong evidence for slowing myopia progression.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Nutritional supplementation has been proposed as a potential adjunct strategy in myopia prevention and control through antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and extracellular matrix-regulating mechanisms. This systematic review aimed to evaluate randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence on the effects of carotenoids, anthocyanins, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and combined nutraceutical formulations on refractive outcomes, axial length, macular pigment optical density (MPOD), visual function, and symptoms of visual fatigue. METHODS: The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251149727) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to 5 August 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs involving individuals with myopia or at risk of myopia, comparing nutritional supplementation with placebo or active controls. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included. Carotenoids such as crocetin, lutein, zeaxanthin, and astaxanthin produced modest benefits, including improved MPOD, reduced visual fatigue, and-in one pediatric trial-slightly less axial elongation. Anthocyanin-rich extracts improved mesopic contrast sensitivity and subjective asthenopia. A combined carotenoid-polyphenol formulation enhanced accommodative facility. However, no consistent clinically meaningful reduction in myopia progression was observed. Trials were generally small, heterogeneous, and short in duration. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional supplementation may improve visual function and retinal antioxidant status but lacks strong evidence for slowing myopia progression. Larger, long-term RCTs are needed before recommending supplementation for routine myopia management.

02
META-ANALYSIS The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2025) PMID: 40522203 ↗
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 1,098 participants. Key conclusion: However, it is not known whether these treatments offer significant long-term advantages over observation or each other.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by a thickened and dysfunctional choroid which is accompanied by a serous detachment of the neural retina. The effects on the retina are usually self-limiting, although some people are left with irreversible vision loss due to progressive and permanent photoreceptor damage or atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). There has been a variety of interventions used in CSC, including, but not limited to, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and drug therapy with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists or intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, it is not known whether these treatments offer significant long-term advantages over observation or each other. At present, there is no evidence-based consensus on the management of CSC. OBJECTIVES: This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2015 where 25 studies with 1098 participants were included. Since then, many trials have been conducted and reports published. Our primary objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness of multiple interventions for CSC. The secondary objective was to provide the relative ranking of the interventions for CSC using network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three trial registries in 29 March 2024, together with reference checking. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any intervention for CSC with any other intervention for CSC or control. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (CL, LP) independently selected studies and extracted data. Our outcomes of interest were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), recurrence of CSC, persistent CSC, contrast sensitivity, central retinal subfield thickness, quality of life, and adverse events. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used Cochrane's statistical software, Review Manager, to perform pairwise analyses and Stata to perform network meta-analysis (NMA). For pairwise comparisons, we pooled data from studies using fixed or random-effects models if there were fewer or more than three

03
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2025) PMID: 40292760 ↗
Lutein and zeaxanthin for reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 532 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.53 (RR 0.49). Key conclusion: OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Lutein and zeaxanthin are nutrients with antioxidant properties found in the macula of the eye and brain tissue. They have been reported to play a role in reducing oxidative damage, especially in the eyes and possibly in other organ systems. Oxygen free radicals are one of the agents postulated to cause tissue damage in preterm infants, which leads to morbidities such as retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). Supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin may reduce oxidative damage, hence reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. SEARCH METHODS: We conducted searches up to 17 December 2024 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registries. We also searched the reference lists of included studies, and related reviews and studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCT, cross-over trials, and quasi-RCTs that compared lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation against placebo or no supplementation for preterm infants less than 37 completed weeks' postmenstrual age. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were the incidence of any stage of ROP, incidence of ROP stage 3 and above, incidence of visual impairment, and mortality assessed throughout the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of IVH, incidence of NEC, and any reported adverse effects. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies (666 preterm infants) that compared lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation versus control (placebo or no supplementation). All five studies were conducted in high-income countries (Italy and the USA). We did not find any studies comparing lutein or zeaxanthin separately versus placebo or no supplementation. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias in most key domains, such as allocation concealment and blinding. The evidence suggests that lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation proba

04
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition (2024) PMID: 40134251 ↗
Role of Lutein Supplements in the Management of Dry Eye Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition involving n = 584 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Lutein supplementation may benefit DED patients by improving symptoms and tear film stability.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Dry Eye Disease (DED) significantly impacts global populations, causing discomfort and vision problems. This review explores the effects of lutein supplementation on DED symptoms and signs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, examining clinical trials from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 584 subjects were included. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity in study designs, dosages, and outcome measures. RESULTS: Lutein dosages ranged from 3 mg/day to 20 mg/day, with treatment durations from 4 to 12 weeks. Improvements were observed in subjective symptoms, with significant reductions in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores in some studies. Objective measures also showed positive results: tear break-up time (TBUT) increased significantly in some trials. However, other studies reported no significant differences between treatment and control groups, reflecting heterogeneity in outcomes. Schirmer's test and corneal-conjunctival staining results varied, with some showing significant improvements and others not. CONCLUSIONS: Lutein supplementation may benefit DED patients by improving symptoms and tear film stability. However, due to study heterogeneity, larger, well-designed RCTs are needed to establish standardized dosing and confirm these findings. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

05
CLINICAL STUDY Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia (2025) PMID: 40105670 ↗
Xanthophylls: potential benefits in protecting against UV burns.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia. Key conclusion: In conclusion, this review suggests a promising role for xanthophylls in alleviating UV burn symptoms and promoting skin healing.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a significant risk factor for sunburn (solar erythema) and skin cancer. Current treatments focus primarily on symptom relief, making the need for new therapeutic approaches urgent. Xanthophylls, a class of natural pigments with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, show promise in the management of UV burns. This review aimed to systematically analyze the potential of xanthophylls for the management of UV burns, evaluating their efficacy in clinical and experimental studies. A literature review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in the PUBMED, Virtual Health Library and EMBASE databases for eligible articles, using combinations of keywords such as astaxanthin, lutein, fucoxanthin and their effects on burns. Three independent reviewers conducted the search and selection of studies with inclusion criteria that addressed the use of xanthophylls in the treatment of burns, their mechanisms of action, pathophysiology and therapeutic approaches. Systematic reviews, letters, conference abstracts and case reports were excluded, considering only articles published in English. The articles were pre-selected by reading titles and abstracts, and the pre-selected studies were read in full for the final selection. Xanthophylls with potential benefits were identified, highlighting lutein, astaxanthin and violaxanthin, which demonstrated antioxidant activity by reducing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitigating inflammatory responses in skin cells exposed to UV radiation. Furthermore, evidence suggests that these xanthophylls promote skin barrier function and accelerate healing, enhancing recovery from UV burns. In conclusion, this review suggests a promising role for xanthophylls in alleviating UV burn symptoms and promoting skin healing. However, further research, including in vivo studies and clinical trials, is needed to validate its therapeutic potential, determine the optimal dosage, and optimize its delivery for effective UV burn control.

06
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Journal of medicinal food (2025) PMID: 39804624 ↗
Oral Supplements and Photoprotection: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Journal of medicinal food. Key conclusion: Future research is necessary to determine optimal dosing and supplementation duration for intended photoprotective outcomes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Photoprotective effects of various nutritional components and supplements have been demonstrated in animal and in vitro studies. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the photoprotective effects of various dietary supplements. A systematic review of studies assessing dietary supplements on photoprotective outcomes was performed. Human studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane in February 2023. Supplement keywords included "dietary supplements," "vitamins," "minerals," "carotenoids," "lutein," "isoflavones," "polyphenols," "Polypodium leucotomos," "heliocare," "herbal medicine," "probiotics," "prebiotics," "astaxanthin," "rosmarinic acid," "botanical," and "herb," and outcome keywords included "photoprotection," "ultraviolet rays," UVA," "UVB," and "blue light." A total of 47 studies were included in the systematic review. Studied supplements included carotenoids, polyphenols, Polypodium leucotomos (PL), melon concentrate, vitamins, coenzyme Q, squalene, and omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. Some studies evaluated mixed supplementation and incorporated other active ingredients such as selenium and probiotics. The greatest evidence of photoprotection exists for polyphenols, carotenoid-based, and PL supplementation. While flavanol supplementation exhibited dose-dependency, dose-dependency could not be consistently demonstrated for polyphenol supplementation. The weakest evidence exists for photoprotective effects of isolated vitamin or coenzyme Q supplementation. Dietary supplements may promote enhanced photoprotection, although current evidence is limited by small sample size and short duration. Supplementation with photoprotective active ingredients may be especially favorable for individuals with predisposed ultraviolet sensitivity, such as those with polymorphic light eruption. Future research is necessary to determine optimal dosing and supplementation duration for intended photoprotective outcomes.

07
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Hormone molecular biology and clinical investigation (2025) PMID: 39436867 ↗
The neuropharmacological and clinical effects of lutein: a systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Hormone molecular biology and clinical investigation. Key conclusion: However, some studies did not find any significant associations.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: Neurodegenerative diseases are defined by specific protein accumulation and anatomic vulnerability leading to neuronal loss. Some studies have shown that lutein may have an effect on neurodegenerative diseases. As most of the neurodegenerative diseases don't have certain cure and therapies focus on symptom control, Lutein may be a complementary treatment. Due to controversies in studies investigating lutein effect on neurodegenerative diseases, we decided to perform a systematic review on these studies. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in the available databases. We used all MeSH terms and relevant keywords. Studies that reported relationship between lutein and any neurodegenerative disease were included. RESULTS: We found 278 studies. After removing duplicates, screening by titles and abstracts and excluding irrelevant papers, 17 articles were included in this study. Fourteen studies investigated Alzheimer's disease, 2 studies Parkinson's disease and 1 study Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. 1/17 study found that high serum levels of lutein at baseline were associated with a lower risk of AD mortality and lutein effect on lipid profile have been investigated in 2/17 studies. Also, 1/17 study has been shown that high intake of lutein may reduce the risk of ALS progression. CONCLUSIONS: 4/17 studies confirm that lutein can improve cognitive function. 8/17 studies demonstrate a reduction in the progression of AD, and 2/17 studies indicate an improvement in lipid profiles. However, some studies did not find any significant associations. Additionally, there is a limited number of studies investigating the effects of lutein on other neurodegenerative diseases. © 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Food & function (2024) PMID: 39229651 ↗
A systematic review of dietary and circulating carotenoids and liver disease.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Food & function; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05 (SMD -0.58). Key conclusion: Dietary β-carotene intake (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI (-0.31, -0.13), P < 0.001) was negatively associated with the risk of liver disease.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: due to the high incidence of liver disease and the severity of adverse outcomes, liver disease has become a serious public health problem, bringing a huge disease burden to individuals, families, and society. Most studies have shown significant differences in serum carotenoid content and dietary carotenoid intake between liver disease patients and non-liver disease patients, but some studies have reported contrary results. This paper aimed to systematically review and analyze all published epidemiological studies on carotenoids and liver disease to quantitatively assess the relationship between serum and dietary carotenoid concentrations and liver disease. Methods: by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases according to pre-combined search terms from inception to July 23, 2024, 30 studies were found to meet the exclusion criteria. Finally, 3 RCT studies, 6 cohort studies, 11 case-control studies, 9 cross-sectional studies, and 1 RCT-combined cross-sectional study were included in the further analysis. Two reviewers independently scored the literature quality and extracted data, and the results were represented by the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval. Cochran Q statistics and I2 statistics were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity (defined as significant when P < 0.05 or I2 > 50%). When there was insignificant heterogeneity, a fixed effects model was selected; otherwise a random effects model was used. Publication bias was assessed by the Egger test. Results: pooled meta-analysis showed that serum α-carotene (SMD = -0.58, 95% CI (-0.83, -0.32), P < 0.001), β-carotene (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI (-1.13, -0.49), P < 0.001), and lycopene (SMD = -1.06, 95% CI (-1.74, -0.38), P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with the risk and severity of liver disease. However, no significant difference was observed between serum β-cryptoxanthin (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.41, 0.45), P = 0.92) and lutein/zeaxanthin (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI (-1.20, 2.45), P = 0.502). Dietary β-carotene intake (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI (-0.31, -0.13), P < 0.001) was negatively associated with the risk of liver disease. The Eg

09
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Seminars in ophthalmology (2024) PMID: 38717910 ↗
"Analysis of Macular Pigment Optical Density in Childhood: A Systematic Review".
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Systematic Review published in Seminars in ophthalmology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Lutein and zeaxanthin accumulation plays an important role during the maturational stage and childhood development.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: This systematic review studies the relationship between Macular Pigment Optical Density (MPOD) values and cognitive and visual function in childhood. METHODS: It included cross-sectional, observational studies or controlled clinical trials in humans between 0 and 18 years of age, analyzing MPOD values in 3 main databases: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review. The relationship of cognitive function, visual function and diverse variables with MPOD was analyzed in 4, 4 and 5 studies, respectively. The age of the participants ranged between premature infants to 12 years. Most of the studies used Heterochromatic Flicker Photometry (HFP) with macular densitometer to obtain MPOD values. MPOD values ranged between 0 (undetectable) to 0.66 ± 0.03 d.u. Only 4 articles studied the relationship between MPOD values and dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin using questionnaires about diet. CONCLUSIONS: Lutein and zeaxanthin accumulation plays an important role during the maturational stage and childhood development. Although cognitive function is more strongly correlated with MPOD values, the relationship with visual function remains unclear, and further studies are required to support this relationship.

10
META-ANALYSIS Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) (2024) PMID: 38582248 ↗
Effect of Antioxidant Supplementation on Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). Key conclusion: Overall, antioxidant supplementation was estimated to improve eye health parameters, whereas different combinations of antioxidants may also have varying effects on improving visual health from multiple perspectives.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Antioxidants are bioactive molecules that function to scavenge free radicals and balance oxidative stress. Although all antioxidants can act as reactive oxygen species scavengers, their efficacy on eye health may vary. Moreover, the comparative effectiveness and potential additive effect between groups of antioxidants, hitherto, have not been systematically studied. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the comparative or additive effect of dietary antioxidant supplements on eye health. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane) were searched, and relevant randomized controlled trials were identified. Out of 60 articles selected for systematic review, 38 were included in the network meta-analysis, categorized into 8 distinct antioxidant-supplemented groups and placebo. All groups significantly increased macular pigment optical density and contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequency, whereas only the antioxidant mixture + lutein (L) + fatty acid combination exhibited significant improvements in visual acuity (hazard ratio = -0.15; 95% confidence interval: -0.28, -0.02) and L + zeaxanthin combination for photostress recovery time (hazard ratio = -5.75; 95% confidence interval: -8.80, -1.70). Especially, the L + zeaxanthin + fatty acid combination was ranked best for macular pigment optical density (surface under the cumulative ranking: 99.3%) and second best for contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequency (67.7%). However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to low quality of evidence, primarily influenced by indirectness and potential publication bias. Overall, antioxidant supplementation was estimated to improve eye health parameters, whereas different combinations of antioxidants may also have varying effects on improving visual health from multiple perspectives. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022369250.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category