NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 2 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Omega-3 (Dry Eye)

EYE HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

Omega-3 (Dry Eye) is an evidence-graded eye health monograph evaluated across 22 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (5 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 3 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 13,769 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 22 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 5 Meta · 2 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 3 RCTs (2 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 13,769
Reported Trial Dosages 1680 mg · 560 mg · 3000 mg
Trial Duration Range 45 days · 3 months · 12 months
Reading Time ~11 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 22 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1680 mg · 560 mg · 3000 mg) over a structured 45 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary eye health clinical efficacy (22 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (16 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (3 RCTs · 2 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (5 meta-analyses · 2 reviews)
01

What Is Omega-3 (Dry Eye) & Why Does Form Matter?

Omega-3 (Dry Eye) is classified under EYE HEALTH and has been investigated across 22 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1680 mg, 560 mg, 3000 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Omega-3 (Dry Eye) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (3 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Omega-3 (Dry Eye) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Omega-3 (Dry Eye) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 22 PubMed studies: 5 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 3 randomized controlled trials (2 double-blind, n = 13,769 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:37026263 (2023) — "Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: A meta-analysis and systematic review." (DED is a multifactorial disorder, and IPL therapy has been found to be safe and efficient in reducing its signs and symptoms of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related DE.) • PMID:35597519 (2022) — "Interventions for the Management of Computer Vision Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." (Oral carotenoid supplementation improved CFF (2 RCTs; MD, 1.55 Hz; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.67 Hz; P = 0.007) relative to placebo, although the clinical significance of this finding is unclear.) • PMID:31847055 (2019) — "Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease." (We found moderate certainty evidence for a probable benefit of long-chain omega-3 supplements in increasing aqueous tear production relative to placebo (six studies, 1704 participants; MD 0.68, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.09 mm/5 min using the Schirmer test), although we did not judge this )

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 370262631.77PMID 355975190.11 (-0.7–0.16)-1.1Null (0)2.1Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1680 mg · 560 mg · 3000 mg · 180 mg over 45 days · 3 months · 12 months · 12 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MODERATE] Warfarin: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:15050579). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

• [MODERATE] Aspirin: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:15050579). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1680 mg · 560 mg · 3000 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 45 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Warfarin, Aspirin.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (22 Studies) · 16 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Indian journal of ophthalmology (2023) PMID: 37026263 ↗
Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Indian journal of ophthalmology (SMD 1.77). Key conclusion: DED is a multifactorial disorder, and IPL therapy has been found to be safe and efficient in reducing its signs and symptoms of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related DE.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This study reviewed the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). The PubMed database was used to conduct the literature search, which used the keywords "intense pulsed light" and "dry eye disease". After the authors evaluated the articles for relevancy, 49 articles were reviewed. In general, all treatment modalities were proven to be clinically effective in reducing dry eye (DE) signs and symptoms; however, the level of improvement and persistence of outcomes differed amongst them. Meta-analysis indicated significant improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores post-treatment with a standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.63; confidence interval (CI): -2.42 to -0.84. Moreover, a meta-analysis indicated a significant improvement in tear break-up time (TBUT) test values with SMD = 1.77; CI: 0.49 to 3.05. Research suggests that additive therapies, such as meibomian gland expression (MGX), sodium hyaluronate eye drops, heated eye mask, warm compress, lid hygiene, lid margin scrub, eyelid massage, antibiotic drops, cyclosporine drops, omega-3 supplements, steroid drops, and warm compresses along with IPL, have been found to work in tandem for greater effectiveness; however, in clinical practice, its feasibility and cost-effectiveness have to be taken into consideration. Current findings suggest that IPL therapy is suitable when lifestyle modifications such as reducing or eliminating the use of contact lenses, lubricating eye drops/gels, and warm compresses/eye masks fail to improve signs and symptoms of DE. Moreover, patients with compliance issues have been shown to benefit well as the effects of IPL therapy is sustained for over several months. DED is a multifactorial disorder, and IPL therapy has been found to be safe and efficient in reducing its signs and symptoms of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related DE. Although the treatment protocol varies among authors, current findings suggest that IPL has a positive effect on the signs and symptoms of MGD-related DE. However, patients in the early stages can benefit more from IPL therapy. Moreover, IPL has a better maintenance impact when used in

02
META-ANALYSIS Ophthalmology (2022) PMID: 35597519 ↗
Interventions for the Management of Computer Vision Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Ophthalmology involving n = 4,497 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.38 (SMD 0.11). Key conclusion: Oral carotenoid supplementation improved CFF (2 RCTs; MD, 1.55 Hz; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.67 Hz; P = 0.007) relative to placebo, although the clinical significance of this finding is unclear.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

TOPIC: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for treating eye strain related to computer use relative to placebo or no treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Computer use is pervasive and often associated with eye strain, referred to as computer vision syndrome (CVS). Currently, no clinical guidelines exist to help practitioners provide evidence-based advice about CVS treatments, many of which are marketed directly to patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to help inform best practice for eye care providers. METHODS: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and trial registries, searched from inception through November 23, 2021. Eligible studies were appraised for risk of bias and were synthesized. The certainty of the body of evidence was judged using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used when differently scaled measures were combined. RESULTS: Forty-five RCTs, involving 4497 participants, were included. Multifocal lenses did not improve visual fatigue scores compared with single-vision lenses (3 RCTs; SMD, 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.14 to 0.37; P = 0.38). Visual fatigue symptoms were not reduced by blue-blocking spectacles (3 RCTs), with evidence judged of low certainty. Relative to placebo, oral berry extract supplementation did not improve visual fatigue (7 RCTs; SMD, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.70 to 0.16; P = 0.22) or dry eye symptoms (4 RCTs; SMD, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.54 to 0.33; P = 0.65). Likewise, berry extract supplementation had no significant effects on critical flicker-fusion frequency (CFF) or accommodative amplitude. Oral omega-3 supplementation for 45 days to 3 months improved dry eye symptoms (2 RCTs; mean difference [MD], -3.36; 95% CI, -3.63 to -3.10 on an 18 unit scale; P < 0.00001) relative to placebo. Oral carotenoid supplementation improved CFF (2 RCTs; MD, 1.55 Hz; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.67 Hz; P = 0.007) relative to placebo, although the clinical significance of this finding is unclear. DISCUSSION: We did not identify high-certa

03
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2019) PMID: 31847055 ↗
Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 677 participants (RR 2.34). Key conclusion: We found moderate certainty evidence for a probable benefit of long-chain omega-3 supplements in increasing aqueous tear production relative to placebo (six studies, 1704 participants; MD 0.68, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.09 mm/5 min using the Schirmer test), although we did not judge this
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplements, involving omega-3 and/or omega-6 components, have been proposed as a therapy for dry eye. Omega-3 PUFAs exist in both short- (alpha-linolenic acid [ALA]) and long-chain (eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) forms, which largely derive from certain plant- and marine-based foods respectively. Omega-6 PUFAs are present in some vegetable oils, meats, and other animal products. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplements on dry eye signs and symptoms. SEARCH METHODS: CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, two other databases and three trial registries were searched in February 2018, together with reference checking. A top-up search was conducted in October 2019, but the results have not yet been incorporated. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving dry eye participants, in which omega-3 and/or omega-6 supplements were compared with a placebo/control supplement, artificial tears, or no treatment. We included head-to-head trials comparing different forms or doses of PUFAs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methods and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 34 RCTs, involving 4314 adult participants from 13 countries with dry eye of variable severity and etiology. Follow-up ranged from one to 12 months. Nine (26.5%) studies had published protocols and/or were registered. Over half of studies had high risk of bias in one or more domains. Long-chain omega-3 (EPA and DHA) versus placebo or no treatment (10 RCTs) We found low certainty evidence that there may be little to no reduction in dry eye symptoms with long-chain omega-3 versus placebo (four studies, 677 participants; mean difference [MD] -2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.14 to 0.19 units). We found moderate certainty evidence for a probable benefit of long-chain omega-3 supplements in increasing aqueous tear production relative to placebo (six studies, 1704 participants; MD 0.68, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.09 mm/5 min using the Schirmer test), although we did not judge this difference to be cli

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2019) PMID: 31027357 ↗
Effects of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Nonspecific Typical Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 1,782 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD 1.8). Key conclusion: Patients who received PUFA treatment without other eye medications exhibited greater improvements in TBUT (MD = 1.80; p = 0.001), Schirmer test scores (MD = 0.50; p < 0.001), osmolarity (MD = -15.95; p < 0.001), and OSDI scores (MD = -10.19; p < 0.001) than those who received pla
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

To investigate the effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in patients with dry eye disease (DED), a multifactorial inflammatory disorder, we searched Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of PUFAs in patients with DED before March 2019. Two reviewers independently abstracted data of tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, osmolarity, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI). We conducted pairwise meta-analysis using means and standard deviations (SDs) in a random-effects model for continuous outcomes. Thirteen eligible RCTs with 1782 patients with nonspecific typical DED were included. Patients who received PUFA treatment without other eye medications exhibited greater improvements in TBUT (MD = 1.80; p = 0.001), Schirmer test scores (MD = 0.50; p < 0.001), osmolarity (MD = -15.95; p < 0.001), and OSDI scores (MD = -10.19; p < 0.001) than those who received placebo treatment. However, the effects of PUFAs on TBUT (p < 0.001) and OSDI scores (p = 0.03) weakened with treatment duration. PUFAs are effective in treating nonspecific typical DED, particularly as a short-term treatment, with relatively few adverse events. Therefore, in real-world clinical practice, PUFA supplements are worth being suggested to patients with nonspecific typical DED who are not concurrently using other topical or systematic eye medications.

05
META-ANALYSIS Cornea (2019) PMID: 30702470 ↗
Efficacy of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Cornea involving n = 3,363 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence that omega-3 FA supplementation significantly improves dry eye symptoms and signs in patients with dry eye disease.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: To assess whether omega-3 fatty acid (FA) supplementation is more efficacious than placebo in amelioration of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. We included randomized clinical trials comparing omega-3 FA supplementation with placebo in patients with dry eye disease. The outcome measures were dry eye symptoms, breakup time (BUT), Schirmer test, and corneal fluorescein staining. The pooled effect sizes were estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q and I tests. Sensitivity analysis and assessment of publication bias were performed. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seventeen randomized clinical trials involving 3363 patients were included. Compared with placebo, omega-3 FA supplementation decreased dry eye symptoms [standardized difference in mean values (SDM) = 0.968; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.554-1.383; P < 0.001] and corneal fluorescein staining (SDM = 0.517; 95% CI, 0.043-0.991; P = 0.032), whereas it increased the BUT (SDM = 0.905; 95% CI, 0.564-1.246; P < 0.001) and Schirmer test values (SDM = 0.905; 95% CI, 0.564-1.246; P < 0.001). No evidence of publication bias was observed, and sensitivity analyses indicated the robustness of results obtained. Meta-regression analysis showed a higher improvement of dry eye symptoms and BUT in studies conducted in India. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence that omega-3 FA supplementation significantly improves dry eye symptoms and signs in patients with dry eye disease. Therefore, our findings indicate that omega-3 FA supplementation may be an effective treatment for dry eye disease.

06
META-ANALYSIS Medical science monitor (2014) PMID: 25193932 ↗
Omega-3 essential fatty acids therapy for dry eye syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2014 Meta-Analysis published in Medical science monitor involving n = 790 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.007 (MD 1.58). Key conclusion: No significant differences were detected in OSDI test results.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Dry eye is a common, complex condition that can reduce ocular comfort and visual performance. The impact on quality of life has been rated as similar to the effect of moderate angina and, in more severe cases, dialysis and severe angina. This study aimed to use meta-analysis to compare omega-3 fatty acid and placebo fatty acid in the management of dry eye syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparative studies published until 1 June 2014 were searched through a comprehensive search of the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases. A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies reporting the effect of omega-3 fatty acid on dry eye syndrome was conducted. All analyses were performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) v.5 software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). RESULTS: The trials involved a total of 790 participants in 7 independent studies. All the studies are published between 2007 and 2013. Meta-analysis of the 5 studies that reported data in mean SD values revealed that the tear break-up time (TBUT) was significantly greater by 1.58 s (WMD=1.58, 95% CI=0.60 to 2.55; P=0.007). Combination of all the Schirmer's test data showed that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation could significantly improve the Schirmer's test (WMD=0.74, 95% CI=0.29 to 1.19; P=0.001). However, the combination of all the OSDI test data showed that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation did not significantly improve the OSDI test results (WMD=-4.54, 95% CI=-9.85 to 0.78; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the data included in our meta-analysis, omega-3 fatty acid was associated with better TBUT and Schirmer's. No significant differences were detected in OSDI test results. Consequently, our findings suggest that omega-3 fatty acid offers is an effective therapy for dry eye syndrome.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Eye (London, England) (2026) PMID: 41291245 ↗
Association between lid margin collarettes and dry eye disease severity in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Eye (London, England); statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: Although they were associated with worse ocular surface signs, notably eyelid erythema, no association was found with dry eye symptoms.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Lid margin collarettes are a distinct clinical finding and their association with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and dry eye symptoms and signs remains uncertain. We leverage the large cohort of subjects in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) study data to elucidate collarettes' impact on dry eye disease (DED). SUBJECTS/METHODS: We performed secondary analysis of DREAM study data, a multicentre, double-blinded clinical trial evaluating omega-3 supplementation in patients with moderate-to-severe DED. DED symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI] and Ocular Discomfort) and signs (conjunctival staining, corneal staining, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test, MGD grade) were compared by collarette presence and severity. Data from all visits (baseline, months 3, 6, 12) were assessed and adjusted for demographics and baseline comorbidities. RESULTS: Of 1070 eyes at baseline, 65.3% had no collarettes, 28.0% had 1-5, and 6.6% had 6-20. Over the 1 year period of the study, 67% of eyes had no change in collarette severity, while 19% had increased severity and 14% had decreased severity. Collarettes were more common in Whites (82.1% vs 69.9%, p = 0.001), non-Hispanics (92.3% vs 83.2%, p = 0.006), and those with facial rosacea (25.0% vs 17.7%, p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed collarettes were associated with increased corneal staining (5.06 vs 4.59, p = 0.01), decreased TBUT (3.24 vs 3.54 s, p = 0.01), decreased Schirmer test (7.92 vs 8.63, p = 0.04), more severe eyelid erythema (18.6% vs 12.2%, p < 0.001), and higher composite DED sign severity (0.51 vs 0.49, p = 0.03). However, they were not associated with conjunctival staining, MGD grade, or DED symptoms (p ≥ 0.30). Similar findings were observed in comparisons of collarette severity. Subjects with collarettes had lower tear levels of IL-1β (p = 0.04), IL-10 (p = 0.02), and INF-γ (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Collarettes were common in patients with moderate-to-severe DED, and most do not progress over time. Although they were associated with worse ocular surface signs, notably eyelid erythema, no association was found with dry eye symptoms. Our results will help physicians

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics (2025) PMID: 39907215 ↗
A Multicenter, Randomized, Clinical Trial Assessing the Effect of rTG-Omega 3 Supplementation on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Patients after Cataract Surgery rTG-Omega 3 for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics involving n = 107 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.005. Key conclusion: In particular, MG quality and expressibility were significantly improved in the severe MGD group.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background/Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of re-esterified triglyceride form of omega 3 (rTG-omega 3) on patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) after cataract surgery. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, clinical study was conducted between June 2021 and March 2023 and enrolled 107 patients with MGD who had undergone cataract surgery within 3 months at seven sites across South Korea. Patients were randomly assigned to rTG-omega 3 group or a control group. We compared (1) tear film break-up time (TBUT) (s), (2) corneal fluorescein staining score [National Eye Institute/Industry (NEI) scale], (3) conjunctival fluorescein staining score (NEI scale), (4) strip meniscometry (SM) tube score (mm), (5) MGD stage, (6) MG quality, (7) MG expressibility, (8) Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score, and (9) Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks. Results: TBUT, corneal fluorescein staining score, and SM tube score were significantly improved in the rTG-omega 3 group compared with control group (P = 0.005, P = 0.003, and P = 0.0049, respectively). Subjective questionnaire responses were also improved significantly (SPEED score, P = 0.022; OSDI score, P = 0.0011). MGD parameters were not significantly different. However, during subanalysis, significant improvements in MG quality and expressibility were observed in the MGD stage 4 group with rTG-omega 3 supplementation (P = 0.0177 and P = 0.0205, respectively). Discussion: rTG-omega 3 supplementation facilitated improvements in both objective and subjective parameters. In particular, MG quality and expressibility were significantly improved in the severe MGD group.

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) JAMA ophthalmology (2024) PMID: 38753336 ↗
Re-Esterified Triglyceride ω-3 Fatty Acids in Dry Eye Disease With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in JAMA ophthalmology involving n = 132 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.12. Key conclusion: The OSDI (SD) change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks was -20.5 (16.0) and -22.7 (15.7), respectively, in the ω-3 group and -15.1 (20.2) and -18.8 (21.7), respectively, in the grape-seed control group (difference at 6 weeks = -5.4; 95% CI, -12.15 to 1.33; P = .12 and at 12 weeks =
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Comment in JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;142(7):625-626. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1658. IMPORTANCE: Taking ω-3 supplements has been associated with a reduction in symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). However, a recent relatively large clinical trial concluded that treating DED with ω-3 consumption was ineffective, potentially warranting additional investigations. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of re-esterified triglyceride (rTG) ω-3 fatty acid supplementation on DED associated with MGD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-masked, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 7 institutions from September 2020 to January 2023. Patients with DED associated with MGD were included and randomly assigned to the ω-3 group (received 1680 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid and 560 mg of docosahexaenoic acid), whereas those in the grape-seed group received 3000 mg of grape-seed oil daily. INTERVENTIONS: rTG ω-3 Fatty acid supplementation vs grape-seed oil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks. The safety parameters were visual acuity and intraocular pressure change. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.6 [13.8] years; 103 female [78.0%]) were included in this study. The mean (SD) baseline OSDI scores of the ω-3 and grape-seed groups were 43.5 (16.5) and 44.1 (16.6), respectively. A total of 58 patients (87.9%) and 57 patients (86.4%) in the ω-3 and grape-seed groups, respectively, completed 12 weeks of follow-up. There were no differences in compliance with the dietary supplement intake between groups (ω-3, 95.8% and grape-seed, 95.4%). The OSDI (SD) change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks was -20.5 (16.0) and -22.7 (15.7), respectively, in the ω-3 group and -15.1 (20.2) and -18.8 (21.7), respectively, in the grape-seed control group (difference at 6 weeks = -5.4; 95% CI, -12.15 to 1.33; P = .12 and at 12 weeks = -3.9; 95% CI, -10.90 to 3.13; P = .28). There were no changes in safety parameters or adverse events related to taking the dietary supplement in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Th

10
CLINICAL STUDY Cornea (2024) PMID: 38391283 ↗
Two-Year Progression of Dry Eye Disease in Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Cornea involving n = 43 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.02. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a progression of DED signs or symptoms over a 2-year period, except for a probable placebo response in symptoms in the first 3 months and an improvement in conjunctival staining score.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the progression of dry eye disease (DED) symptoms and signs over 2 years through a secondary analysis of data collected from the Dry Eye Assessment and Management study. METHODS: Participants who were assigned to omega-3 fatty acid in the first year were rerandomized in the second year to either continue with omega-3 fatty acid or switch to placebo. At baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, DED symptoms were evaluated by using the Ocular Surface Disease Index and the Brief Ocular Discomfort Index (BODI). DED signs were assessed using conjunctival staining, corneal staining, tear break-up time, Schirmer testing, and keratography measures. Medication usage was documented at each visit. Because the treatment and placebo groups displayed no statistical differences in both signs and symptoms, data from the 43 participants were combined to assess longitudinal changes in symptoms and signs. RESULTS: At 3 months after omega-3 fatty acid treatment, there were significant improvements from baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index and Brief Ocular Discomfort Index scores (all P ≤ 0.002) and less use of artificial tears or gel ( P = 0.02), but between 3 and 24 months, no significant changes in symptoms and treatments were observed ( P ≥ 0.06). Except for a significant improvement in conjunctival staining score over 2 years ( P = 0.001), there were no significant sign changes in corneal staining ( P = 0.32), tear break-up time ( P = 0.43), Schirmer test ( P = 0.09), and additional measures (all P ≥ 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a progression of DED signs or symptoms over a 2-year period, except for a probable placebo response in symptoms in the first 3 months and an improvement in conjunctival staining score.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category