NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

Multivitamin (Children)

VITAMINS · Evidence Monograph

Multivitamin (Children) is an evidence-graded vitamins monograph evaluated across 29 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (11 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 924,973 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for cellular coenzyme synthesis, metabolic methylation, and micronutrient homeostasis.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 29 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 11 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 924,973
Reported Trial Dosages 800 µg/day · 0 µg/day · 400 μg
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 36 weeks · 2 months
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for cellular coenzyme synthesis, metabolic methylation, and micronutrient homeostasis (supported by 29 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (800 µg/day · 0 µg/day · 400 μg) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Bioactive Coenzyme or Standardized Vitamin Form
Prioritize bioactive coenzyme forms (such as methylated B-vitamins or cholecalciferol D3) matched to water- or fat-soluble absorption pathways.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Steady daytime energy and correction of subclinical deficiency markers over 4–8 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: If mild nausea occurs on an empty stomach, switch immediately to post-meal dosing and check for duplicate multivitamin overlap.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window AM 08:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
B-complex and fat-soluble vitamins show optimal absorption and minimal sleep disruption when taken with morning or midday meals.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary vitamins clinical efficacy (29 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (18 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (6 RCTs · 6 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (11 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Multivitamin (Children) & Why Does Form Matter?

Multivitamin (Children) is classified under VITAMINS and has been investigated across 29 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in cellular coenzyme synthesis, metabolic methylation, and micronutrient homeostasis.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (800 µg/day, 0 µg/day, 400 μg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Multivitamin (Children) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Multivitamin (Children) acts on pathways governing cellular coenzyme synthesis, metabolic methylation, and micronutrient homeostasis. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Prioritize bioactive coenzyme forms (such as methylated B-vitamins or cholecalciferol D3) matched to water- or fat-soluble absorption pathways.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Multivitamin (Children) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 29 PubMed studies: 11 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 924,973 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39074459 (2025) — "Preconception Folic Acid and Multivitamin Supplementation for the Prevention of Neural Tube Defect: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." (The random-effects model analysis from 10 included systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the pooled effect of either folic acid or multivitamin supplementation for the prevention of NTD globally is found to be 0.43 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.58) (I2 = 93.50%; p ≤0.001).) • PMID:36321557 (2022) — "Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas." (red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations of less than 305 nanomoles per litre (nmol/L); serum or plasma concentrations of less than 7 nmol/L) is common in many parts of the world and often presents as megaloblastic anaemia, resulting from inadequate intake, increased requiremen) • PMID:34444717 (2021) — "Prenatal Vitamins and the Risk of Offspring Autism Spectrum Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (The meta-analysis of prenatal multivitamin supplements involved 904,947 children (8159 cases), and in the overall analysis showed no robust association with offspring autism; however, a reduced risk was observed in the subgroup of high-quality observational studies (RR 0.77, 95% )

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 344447170.77 (0.62–0.96)PMID 309525060.62 (0.45–0.86)PMID 349648900.9 (0.83–0.97)PMID 412523760.7 (0.62–0.78)PMID 365508061.53 (1.28–1.84)PMID 353884720.85 (0.69–1.03)0.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Bioactive Coenzyme or Standardized Vitamin Form. Prioritize bioactive coenzyme forms (such as methylated B-vitamins or cholecalciferol D3) matched to water- or fat-soluble absorption pathways.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 800 µg/day · 0 µg/day · 400 μg · 0 μg over 12 weeks · 36 weeks · 2 months. Optimal timing window: AM 08:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (B-complex and fat-soluble vitamins show optimal absorption and minimal sleep disruption when taken with morning or midday meals.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Steady daytime energy and correction of subclinical deficiency markers over 4–8 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: If mild nausea occurs on an empty stomach, switch immediately to post-meal dosing and check for duplicate multivitamin overlap.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Multivitamin (Children), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (AM 08:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (800 µg/day · 0 µg/day · 400 μg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (29 Studies) · 18 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Neuroepidemiology (2025) PMID: 39074459 ↗
Preconception Folic Acid and Multivitamin Supplementation for the Prevention of Neural Tube Defect: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Neuroepidemiology. Key conclusion: The random-effects model analysis from 10 included systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the pooled effect of either folic acid or multivitamin supplementation for the prevention of NTD globally is found to be 0.43 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.58) (I2 = 93.50%; p ≤0.001).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Previous reviews explored the association between maternal use of folic acid and multivitamin supplements and risk of neural tube defect (NTD) in children, with no definitive conclusion. These reviews had produced contradictory results, and there had been no umbrella review. Therefore, the objective of this umbrella review is to combine the inconsistent data on the effect of prenatal folic acid and/or multivitamin supplementation for the prevention of NTD in offspring. METHODS: Using the PRISMA guideline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Google Scholar reported that the effects of folic acid and/or multivitamin supplementation for the prevention of NTD in offspring were searched. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). A weighted inverse variance random-effects model was applied to find the pooled estimates. The subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were also assessed. RESULT: Ten SRM with 296,816 study participants were included. The random-effects model analysis from 10 included systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the pooled effect of either folic acid or multivitamin supplementation for the prevention of NTD globally is found to be 0.43 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.58) (I2 = 93.50%; p ≤0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled effect was found to be 0.23 (0.09, 0.37) in folic acid group, while this estimate is 0.63 (0.53, 0.72) and 0.61 (0.46, 0.75) in groups who took multivitamin. The pooled effect of prevention of NTD was found to be 0.50 (0.34, 0.66) in SRMs aimed at occurrence prevention (primary prevention) group, while this estimate is 0.20 (-0.01, 0.41) among SRMs, which aimed at reoccurrence (secondary) prevention, and 0.61 (0.46, 0.75) among those SRMs aimed to assess the effect folic acid or multivitamin for the prevention of both occurrence and reoccurrence. The pooled effect of either folic acid or multivitamin supplementation for the prevention of NTD was found to be 0.45 (0.03, 0.87) in SRMs of observational studies, while this estimate is 0.43 (0.32, 0.54) among S

02
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2022) PMID: 36321557 ↗
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Clinical Study published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Key conclusion: red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations of less than 305 nanomoles per litre (nmol/L); serum or plasma concentrations of less than 7 nmol/L) is common in many parts of the world and often presents as megaloblastic anaemia, resulting from inadequate intake, increased requiremen
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Description of the condition Malaria, an infectious disease transmitted by the bite of female mosquitoes from several Anopheles species, occurs in 87 countries with ongoing transmission (WHO 2020). The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that, in 2019, approximately 229 million cases of malaria occurred worldwide, with 94% occurring in the WHO's African region (WHO 2020). Of these malaria cases, an estimated 409,000 deaths occurred globally, with 67% occurring in children under five years of age (WHO 2020). Malaria also negatively impacts the health of women during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period (WHO 2020). Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP), an antifolate antimalarial, has been widely used across sub-Saharan Africa as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria since it was first introduced in Malawi in 1993 (Filler 2006). Due to increasing resistance to SP, in 2000 the WHO recommended that one of several artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) be used instead of SP for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum (Global Partnership to Roll Back Malaria 2001). However, despite these recommendations, SP continues to be advised for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) and intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi), whether the person has malaria or not (WHO 2013). Description of the intervention Folate (vitamin B9) includes both naturally occurring folates and folic acid, the fully oxidized monoglutamic form of the vitamin, used in dietary supplements and fortified food. Folate deficiency (e.g. red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations of less than 305 nanomoles per litre (nmol/L); serum or plasma concentrations of less than 7 nmol/L) is common in many parts of the world and often presents as megaloblastic anaemia, resulting from inadequate intake, increased requirements, reduced absorption, or abnormal metabolism of folate (Bailey 2015; WHO 2015a). Pregnant women have greater folate requirements; inadequate folate intake (evidenced by RBC folate concentrations of less than 400 nanograms per millilitre (ng/mL), or 906 nmol/L) prior to and during the first month of p

03
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2021) PMID: 34444717 ↗
Prenatal Vitamins and the Risk of Offspring Autism Spectrum Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 904,947 participants (RR 0.77). Key conclusion: The meta-analysis of prenatal multivitamin supplements involved 904,947 children (8159 cases), and in the overall analysis showed no robust association with offspring autism; however, a reduced risk was observed in the subgroup of high-quality observational studies (RR 0.77, 95%
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Prenatal nutrition is associated with offspring autism spectrum disorder (herein referred to as autism), yet, it remains unknown if the association is causal. Triangulation may improve causal inference by integrating the results of conventional multivariate regression with several alternative approaches that have unrelated sources of bias. We systematically reviewed the literature on the relationship between prenatal multivitamin supplements and offspring autism, and evidence for the causal approaches applied. Six databases were searched up to 8 June 2020, by which time we had screened 1309 titles/abstracts, and retained 12 articles. Quality assessment was guided using Newcastle-Ottawa in individual studies, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for the body of evidence. The effect estimates from multivariate regression were meta-analysed in a random effects model and causal approaches were narratively synthesised. The meta-analysis of prenatal multivitamin supplements involved 904,947 children (8159 cases), and in the overall analysis showed no robust association with offspring autism; however, a reduced risk was observed in the subgroup of high-quality observational studies (RR 0.77, 95% CI (0.62, 0.96), I2 = 62.4%), early pregnancy (RR 0.76, 95% CI (0.58; 0.99), I2 = 79.8%) and prospective studies (RR 0.69, 95% CI (0.48, 1.00), I2 = 95.9%). The quality of evidence was very low, and triangulation was of limited utility because alternative methods were used infrequently and often not robustly applied.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2021) PMID: 33509399 ↗
Supplemental Vitamins and Minerals for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment: JACC Focus Seminar.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Key conclusion: Conclusive evidence for the benefit of supplements across different dietary backgrounds, when the nutrient is sufficient, has not been demonstrated.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This is an update of the previous 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis of vitamin and mineral supplementation on cardiovascular disease outcomes and all-cause mortality. New randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses were identified by searching the Cochrane library, Medline, and Embase, and data were analyzed using random effects models and classified by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach. This updated review shows similar findings to the previous report for preventive benefits from both folic acid and B vitamins for stroke and has been graded with moderate quality. No effect was seen for the commonly used multivitamins, vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin C, and an increased risk was seen with niacin (with statin) for all-cause mortality. Conclusive evidence for the benefit of supplements across different dietary backgrounds, when the nutrient is sufficient, has not been demonstrated.

05
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2020) PMID: 33147767 ↗
In Utero HIV Exposure and the Early Nutritional Environment Influence Infant Neurodevelopment: Findings from an Evidenced Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Our findings suggest that the early nutritional environment may be leveraged to improve early neurodevelopmental trajectories in infants who have been exposed to HIV in utero.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The developing brain is especially vulnerable to infection and suboptimal nutrition during the pre- and early postnatal periods. Exposure to maternal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and antiretroviral therapies (ART) in utero and during breastfeeding can adversely influence infant (neuro) developmental trajectories. How early life nutrition may be optimised to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes for infants who are HIV-exposed has not been well characterised. We conducted an up-to-date evidence review and meta-analysis on the influence of HIV exposure in utero and during breastfeeding, and early life nutrition, on infant neurodevelopmental outcomes before age three. We report that exposure to maternal HIV infection may adversely influence expressive language development, in particular, and these effects may be detectable within the first three years of life. Further, while male infants may be especially vulnerable to HIV exposure, few studies overall reported sex-comparisons, and whether there are sex-dependent effects of HIV exposure on neurodevelopment remains a critical knowledge gap to fill. Lastly, early life nutrition interventions, including daily maternal multivitamin supplementation during the perinatal period, may improve neurodevelopmental outcomes for infants who are HIV-exposed. Our findings suggest that the early nutritional environment may be leveraged to improve early neurodevelopmental trajectories in infants who have been exposed to HIV in utero. A clear understanding of how this environment should be optimised is key for developing targeted nutrition interventions during critical developmental periods in order to mitigate adverse outcomes later in life and should be a priority of future research.

06
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2019) PMID: 31319515 ↗
Preconception and Prenatal Nutrition and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: We found an overall inverse association between maternal folic acid or multivitamin supplementation and children's risk of ASD; a meta-analysis including six prospective cohort studies estimated an RR of ASD of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.90).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Preconception and prenatal nutrition is critical for fetal brain development. However, its associations with offspring neurodevelopmental disorders are not well understood. This study aims to systematically review the associations of preconception and prenatal nutrition with offspring risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. We searched the PubMed and Embase for articles published through March 2019. Nutritional exposures included nutrient intake or status, food intake, or dietary patterns. Neurodevelopmental outcomes included autism spectrum disorders (ASD), attention deficit disorder-hyperactivity (ADHD) and intellectual disabilities. A total of 2169 articles were screened, and 20 articles on ASD and 17 on ADHD were eventually reviewed. We found an overall inverse association between maternal folic acid or multivitamin supplementation and children's risk of ASD; a meta-analysis including six prospective cohort studies estimated an RR of ASD of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.90). Data on associations of other dietary factors and ASD, ADHD and related outcomes were inconclusive and warrant future investigation. Future studies should integrate comprehensive and more objective methods to quantify the nutritional exposures and explore alternative study design such as Mendelian randomization to evaluate potential causal effects.

07
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) (2019) PMID: 30952506 ↗
Maternal multivitamin supplementation is associated with a reduced risk of autism spectrum disorder in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) involving n = 163 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.003 (RR 0.62). Key conclusion: In conclusion, this meta-analysis supports a protective association between maternal multivitamin supplementation during the prenatal period and the subsequent risk of ASD in children.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Several studies have explored the link of antenatal multivitamin supplementation with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in offspring, but the findings are inconsistent. The purpose of the current study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the actual association between maternal multivitamin supplementation during the prenatal period and the risk of ASD in children. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to August 26, 2018. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled results. The adjusted risk ratios (RRs) were used as the common measure of association among studies. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted. A total of 5 articles (9 independent trials; 231 163 children encompassing 4459 cases) were included. The results of overall analysis showed that the likelihood of ASD in offspring whose mothers used multivitamin supplements during the prenatal period was significantly reduced compared with that in offspring of mothers without such supplementation (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = .003). Additionally, the primary outcome of the meta-analysis was quite robust after being verified by sensitivity analyses and no publication bias was found. Furthermore, the findings of overall analysis were generally consistent with those of subgroup analyses. In conclusion, this meta-analysis supports a protective association between maternal multivitamin supplementation during the prenatal period and the subsequent risk of ASD in children. Further investigation is needed and should address the constituent(s) contributing to the protective effect of multivitamin on ASD risk and the underlying molecular mechanisms.

08
META-ANALYSIS Neuroepidemiology (2018) PMID: 29969765 ↗
Maternal Folate Intake and Risk of Childhood Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in Neuroepidemiology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (OR 0.77). Key conclusion: Further investigations are necessary to increase the reliability of the results and estimate the relationship between dose-response and the best outcome.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies have investigated the effect of maternal diet and prenatal multivitamin supplementation on pediatric cancer risk. Childhood brain and spinal cord tumors (CBSCT) have been attributed to different possible risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on maternal folate intake before and during pregnancy and the risk of CBSCT. We systematically reviewed publications obtained by searching the Insitute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge and PubMed literature databases. We extracted the risk estimate of the highest and the lowest reported categories of intake from each study and conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The results of the pooled analysis of all 10 studies, 1 cohort and 9 case-control studies, indicated that maternal folate intake was inversely associated with CBSCT risk (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.67-0.88, p < 0.001; I2 = 51.22%, p = 0.001). Separate analyses on the basis of the source of folate (folic acid supplementation, dietary folate) and in relation to the timing of exposure (before pregnancy, during pregnancy) found that folic acid supplementation was associated with an approximately 23% reduction in -CBSCT risk (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90, p = 0.001; I2 = 53.18%, p = 0.001) and consumption during pregnancy was associated with an approximately 20% reduction in CBSCT risk (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, p = 0.020; I2 = 62.48%, p < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal consumption of folic acid is associated with a reduced risk of CBSCT. Further investigations are necessary to increase the reliability of the results and estimate the relationship between dose-response and the best outcome. © 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

09
META-ANALYSIS Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology (2018) PMID: 29882975 ↗
Maternal folic acid supplementation for the prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology (OR 0.78). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Low level evidence is available for a modest association between maternal folic acid supplementation and reduction in preeclampsia risk.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a significant contributor to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Folic acid supplementation is recommended periconceptionally for the prevention of neural tube defects. Epidemiological evidence suggests that maternal folic acid supplementation may play a role in preventing other adverse birth outcomes. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effect of maternal folic acid supplementation during pregnancy on risk of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. METHODS: Multiple scientific databases and grey literature were searched for relevant studies. Studies were reviewed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study characteristics were summarised and study quality was assessed. A meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted to examine the effect of maternal folic acid supplementation on preeclampsia risk. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of eight observational studies showed significantly lower odds of preeclampsia with folic acid supplementation in comparison to no folic acid supplementation: OR = 0.78 (95% CI 0.63, 0.98), with moderately high heterogeneity between studies. Subgroup analysis showed no significant subgroup difference between folic acid supplementation taken by itself, in comparison to folic acid taken in or alongside a multivitamin. CONCLUSION: Low level evidence is available for a modest association between maternal folic acid supplementation and reduction in preeclampsia risk. Future studies should differentiate between early and late onset and mild vs severe preeclampsia, and should control for relevant confounders including the presence of multivitamin supplements. The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015029310). © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

10
META-ANALYSIS Orphanet journal of rare diseases (2018) PMID: 29747656 ↗
Maternal drug use and the risk of anorectal malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in Orphanet journal of rare diseases involving n = 14 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Evidence on maternal drug use before conception and during pregnancy as risk factor for ARM from epidemiological stu
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Origin of anorectal malformations (ARM) are considered multifactorial. Several genetic and non-genetic risk factors are discussed in literature. Maternal periconceptional medical drug use as possible risk factor, however, has not been reviewed systematically. METHODS: Studies published between 1977 and April 2017 were reviewed through systematic search in PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus databases. Furthermore, related and cross-referencing publications were reviewed. Pooled odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were determined to quantify associations of maternal periconceptional use of folic acid, multivitamins, anti-asthma medication (separated in any anti-asthma medication, inhaled corticosteroids and salbutamol), thyroid hormone supplements, psychiatric drugs (separated in antidepressants, any selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRI], sertraline, citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, hypnotics and benzodiazepine) and aspirin with ARM using meta-analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies that reported on the association between maternal periconceptional drug intake and infants born with ARM were included in this review. These were conducted in the United States of America (n = 14), Sweden (n = 6), Hungary (n = 5), Germany (n = 3), the Netherlands (n = 3), Denmark (n = 2), France (n = 2), Norway (n = 1) and the UK (n = 1). However, only few of these studies reported on the same risk factors. Studies were heterogeneous with respect to case numbers, period ingestion of medical drug use, control selection and adjustment for covariates. Consistently increased risks were observed for any anti-asthma medication, and hypnotics and benzodiazepine, but not for folic acid, multivitamins, inhaled corticosteroids, salbutamol, thyroid hormone supplements, antidepressants, any SSRI, sertraline, citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine and aspirin. In meta-analyses, pooled odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for any anti-asthma medication, and hypnotics and benzodiazepine were 1.64 (1.22-2.21), and 2.43 (1.03-5.73), respectively. CONCLUSION: Evidence on maternal drug use before conception and during pregnancy as risk factor for ARM from epidemiological stu

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category