NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Prenatal DHA

WOMEN HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

Prenatal DHA is an evidence-graded women health monograph evaluated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (1 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 7,523 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 18 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 1 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 9 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 7,523
Reported Trial Dosages 800 mg · 800 mg/day · 400 mg/day
Trial Duration Range 6 months · 21 weeks · 16 weeks
Reading Time ~9 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 18 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (800 mg · 800 mg/day · 400 mg/day) over a structured 6 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary women health clinical efficacy (18 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (13 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (9 RCTs · 6 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (1 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is Prenatal DHA & Why Does Form Matter?

Prenatal DHA is classified under WOMEN HEALTH and has been investigated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (800 mg, 800 mg/day, 400 mg/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Prenatal DHA frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (9 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Prenatal DHA acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Prenatal DHA an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 18 PubMed studies: 1 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 7,523 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39067112 (2024) — "Docosahexaenoic Acid and Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association with Improved Maternal and Fetal Health." (Given this is a common problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality, further research is required.) • PMID:40791013 (2025) — "Effects of Prenatal DHA Dose on Infant Visual Attention." (Prenatal supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has been reported to improve cognitive outcomes in infancy and early childhood in some studies.) • PMID:38453026 (2024) — "Maternal and Offspring Fatty Acid Desaturase Variants, Prenatal DHA Supplementation, and Dietary n-6:n-3 Fatty Acid Ratio in Relation to Cardiometabolic Health in Mexican Children." (CONCLUSIONS: There was evidence of an interaction of offspring FADS SNP rs174602 with current dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid intake, but not with prenatal DHA supplementation, on MetS score.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)OR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 400726080.18 (0.05–0.62)PMID 378924620.23 (0.06–0.84)PMID 360742451.12 (0.99–1.26)0.2Null (1)5Metric: OR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 800 mg · 800 mg/day · 400 mg/day · 1700 mg over 6 months · 21 weeks · 16 weeks · 15 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Prenatal DHA, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (800 mg · 800 mg/day · 400 mg/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 6 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (18 Studies) · 13 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) (2024) PMID: 39067112 ↗
Docosahexaenoic Acid and Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association with Improved Maternal and Fetal Health.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) involving n = 5,710 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (RR 2.46). Key conclusion: Given this is a common problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality, further research is required.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPRoM) is a significant cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this project was to identify interventions that reduce the prevalence of PPRoM. METHODS: Search strategy included a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The selection criteria included randomized control studies that compared a therapy to standard care (no therapy or placebo) in pregnancy and included PPRoM as an outcome. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies examining 10 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Therapies included docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), aspirin, rofecoxib, vitamin C alone and with vitamin E, folic acid (alone, with iron, with iron and zinc, within a multiple micronutrient supplement), zinc, calcium, copper, and treatment of bacterial vaginosis. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of PPRoM in the treatment groups compared to placebo, except for rofecoxib which showed an increased risk of PPRoM (RR 2.46, 95% CI 1.28-4.73; p = 0.007, 1 trial, 98 women; very low quality of evidence) and a multiple micronutrient supplement which showed a reduction in PPRoM (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84; p = 0.01, 1 trial, 1,671 women; very low quality of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: No interventions have been convincingly shown to reduce the prevalence of PPRoM. Given this is a common problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality, further research is required. © 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.

02
CLINICAL STUDY Developmental psychobiology (2025) PMID: 40791013 ↗
Effects of Prenatal DHA Dose on Infant Visual Attention.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in Developmental psychobiology involving n = 215 participants. Key conclusion: Prenatal supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has been reported to improve cognitive outcomes in infancy and early childhood in some studies.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Prenatal supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has been reported to improve cognitive outcomes in infancy and early childhood in some studies. Existent studies have examined the effects of some dose of DHA against a true placebo; this report is the first to describe the effects of different doses of prenatal DHA on infant visual attention at 4 and 6 months of age. In a follow-up to a Phase III registered clinical trial (NCT02709239) designed to evaluate the effects of two prenatal doses of DHA supplementation (200 or 800 mg daily) on maternal physiology and fetal neurodevelopment, we assessed 215 infants delivered to these mothers at 4 and 6 months on a visual habituation task augmented with heart rate (HR) to assess visual stimulus processing, and a gap-overlap task to assess engagement and disengagement of attention. Infants of mothers supplemented with 800 mg/day of DHA had shorter look durations (indicative of more rapid visual learning) during habituation at both ages and a somewhat more mature pattern of HR-defined phases of attention. However, DHA dose did not affect infant HR, nor did it affect infant performance in the gap-overlap attention task. Results are consistent with positive effects of prenatal DHA supplementation on later outcomes, with higher benefit seen for a higher dose. © 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

03
CLINICAL STUDY The Journal of nutrition (2024) PMID: 38453026 ↗
Maternal and Offspring Fatty Acid Desaturase Variants, Prenatal DHA Supplementation, and Dietary n-6:n-3 Fatty Acid Ratio in Relation to Cardiometabolic Health in Mexican Children.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Journal of nutrition involving n = 203 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: There was evidence of an interaction of offspring FADS SNP rs174602 with current dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid intake, but not with prenatal DHA supplementation, on MetS score.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in fatty acid desaturase (FADS) genes may modify dietary fatty acid requirements and influence cardiometabolic health (CMH). OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the role of selected variants in maternal and offspring FADS genes on offspring CMH at the age of 11 y and assessed interactions of genotype with diet quality and prenatal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation. METHODS: We used data from offspring (n = 203) born to females who participated in a randomized controlled trial of DHA supplementation (400 mg/d) from midgestation to delivery. We generated a metabolic syndrome (MetS) score from body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and fasting glucose and identified 6 distinct haplotypes from 5 offspring FADS SNPs. Dietary n-6 (ω-6):n-3 fatty acid ratios were derived from 24-h recall data (n = 141). We used generalized linear models to test associations of offspring diet and FADS haplotypes with MetS score and interactions of maternal and offspring FADS SNP rs174602 with prenatal treatment group and dietary n-6:n-3 ratio on MetS score. RESULTS: Associations between FADS haplotypes and MetS score were null. Offspring SNP rs174602 did not modify the association of prenatal DHA supplementation with MetS score. Among children with TT or TC genotype for SNP rs174602 (n = 88), those in the highest n-6:n-3 ratio tertile (>8.61) had higher MetS score relative to the lowest tertile [<6.67) (Δ= 0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03, 0.69]. Among children with CC genotype (n = 53), those in the highest n-6:n-3 ratio tertile had a lower MetS score relative to the lowest tertile (Δ= -0.23; 95% CI: -0.61, 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: There was evidence of an interaction of offspring FADS SNP rs174602 with current dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid intake, but not with prenatal DHA supplementation, on MetS score. Further studies may help to determine the utility of targeted supplementation strategies and dietary recommendations based on genetic profile.

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The American journal of clinical nutrition (2023) PMID: 37839707 ↗
Effects of prenatal docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on offspring cardiometabolic health at 11 years differs by maternal single nucleotide polymorphism rs174602: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial in Mexico.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The American journal of clinical nutrition involving n = 160 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The effect of prenatal DHA supplementation on offspring MetS score differed by maternal FADS SNP rs174602.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence regarding long-term effects of prenatal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on offspring cardiometabolic health (CMH). Inconsistent results may be attributable to variants of fatty acid desaturase (FADS) genes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of prenatal DHA supplementation on offspring CMH and investigate effect modification by maternal FADS2 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs174602. METHODS: We used follow-up data from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in Mexico in which pregnant females received 400 mg/d of algal DHA or placebo from midgestation until delivery. The study sample included 314 offspring with data at age 11 y and maternal FADS genetic data (DHA: n = 160; Placebo: n = 154). We derived a Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) score from body mass index, HDL, triglycerides, fasting glucose concentrations, and systolic blood pressure. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on offspring MetS score and test interactions between treatment group and genotype, adjusting for maternal, offspring, and household factors. RESULTS: Offspring MetS score did not differ significantly by treatment group. We observed evidence of effect modification by maternal SNP rs174602 (P = 0.001); offspring of maternal TT genotype who received DHA had lower MetS score relative to the placebo group (DHA (mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)): -0.21 ± 0.11, n = 21; Placebo: 0.05 ± 0.11, n = 23; Δ= -0.26 (95% CI: -0.55, 0.04), P = 0.09); among CC maternal genotype carriers, offspring of mothers who received DHA had higher MetS score (0.18 ± 0.06, n = 62) relative to the placebo group (-0.05 ± 0.06, n = 65, Δ=0.24 (0.06, 0.41), P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The effect of prenatal DHA supplementation on offspring MetS score differed by maternal FADS SNP rs174602. These findings further support incorporating genetic analysis of FADS polymorphisms in DHA supplementation trials. CLINICAL TRIAL DETAILS: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00646360.

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2021) PMID: 34578873 ↗
The Influence of Prenatal DHA Supplementation on Individual Domains of Behavioral Functioning in School-Aged Children: Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: In this healthy, largely term-born sample of children, prenatal DHA supplementation conferred no advantage to childhood behavior, and instead appeared to have an adverse effect on behavioral functioning, as assessed by standardized parental report scales.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) accumulates in the fetal brain during pregnancy and is thought to have a role in supporting neurodevelopment. We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in women with a singleton pregnancy who were <21 weeks' gestation at trial entry. Women were provided with 800 mg DHA/day or a placebo supplement from trial entry until birth. When children reached seven years of age, we invited parents to complete the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), and the Conners 3rd Edition Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Index to assess child behavior and behavioral manifestations of executive dysfunction. There were 543 parent-child pairs (85% of those eligible) that participated in the follow-up. Scores were worse in the DHA group than the placebo group for the BRIEF Global Executive, Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition Indexes, and the Shift, Inhibit, Monitor, Working Memory, and Organization of Materials scales, as well as for the Conners 3 ADHD index, and the SDQ Total Difficulties score, Hyperactivity/Inattention score, and Peer Relationship Problems score. In this healthy, largely term-born sample of children, prenatal DHA supplementation conferred no advantage to childhood behavior, and instead appeared to have an adverse effect on behavioral functioning, as assessed by standardized parental report scales.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) (2021) PMID: 34543890 ↗
Maternal FADS2 single nucleotide polymorphism modified the impact of prenatal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on child neurodevelopment at 5 years: Follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland); statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Maternal FADS2 SNP rs174602 modified the effect of prenatal DHA on cognitive development at 5 years.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Variability in the FADS2 gene, which codifies the Delta-6 Desaturases and modulates the conversion of essential n-3 and n-6 fatty acids into long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, might modify the impact of prenatal supplementation with n-3 docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on neurodevelopment. OBJECTIVE: To assess if maternal FADS2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) modified the effect of prenatal DHA on offspring development at 5 years. DESIGN: We conducted a post-hoc interaction analysis of the POSGRAD randomized controlled trial (NCT00646360) of prenatal supplementation with algal-DHA where 1094 pregnant women originally randomized to 400 mg/day of preformed algal DHA or a placebo from gestation week 18-22 through delivery. In this analysis, we included offspring with information on maternal genotype and neurodevelopment at 5 years (DHA = 316; Control = 306) and used generalized linear models to assess interactions between FADS2 SNPs rs174602 or rs174575 and prenatal DHA on neurodevelopment at 5 years measured with McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (MSCA). RESULTS: Maternal and offspring characteristics were similar between groups. At baseline, mean (±standard deviation) maternal age was 26 ± 5 years and schooling was 12 ± 4 years. Forty-six percent (46%) of the children were female. Maternal minor allele frequencies were 0.37 and 0.33 for SNPs rs174602 and rs174575, respectively. There were significant variations by SNP rs174602 and intervention group (p for interactions <0.05) where children in the intervention group had higher MSCA scores on the quantitative (DHA: mean ± SEM = 22.6 ± 0.9 vs. Control = 19.1 ± 0.9, mean difference (Δ) = 3.45; p = 0.01) and memory (DHA = 27.9 ± 1.1 vs. Control = 23.7 ± 1.1, Δ = 4.26; p = 0.02) scales only among offspring of TT (minor allele homozygotes). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal FADS2 SNP rs174602 modified the effect of prenatal DHA on cognitive development at 5 years. Variations in the genetic make-up of target populations could be an important factor to consider for prenatal DHA supplementation interventions.

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Journal of nutrition (2021) PMID: 34494106 ↗
Infant Metabolome in Relation to Prenatal DHA Supplementation and Maternal Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism rs174602: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial in Mexico.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Journal of nutrition involving n = 70 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate differences in infant metabolism in response to prenatal DHA supplementation by maternal SNP rs174602 and further support the need to incorporate genetic analysis of FADS polymorphisms into DHA
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Although DHA (22:6n-3) is critical for fetal development, results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prenatal DHA supplementation report inconsistent effects on offspring health. Variants in fatty acid desaturase (FADS) genes that regulate the conversion of n-3 and n-6 essential fatty acids into their biologically active derivatives may explain this heterogeneity. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of prenatal DHA supplementation on the offspring metabolome at age 3 mo and explored differences by maternal FADS single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs174602. METHODS: Data were obtained from a double-blind RCT in Mexico [POSGRAD (Prenatal Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation and Child Growth and Development)] in which women (18-35 y old) received DHA (400 mg/d) or placebo from mid-gestation until delivery. Using high-resolution MS with LC, untargeted metabolomics was performed on 112 offspring plasma samples. Discriminatory metabolic features were selected via linear regression (P < 0.05) with false discovery rate (FDR) correction (q = 0.2). Interaction by SNP rs174602 was assessed using 2-factor ANOVA. Stratified analyses were performed, where the study population was grouped into carriers (TT, TC; n = 70) and noncarriers (CC; n = 42) of the minor allele. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed with Mummichog (P < 0.05). RESULTS: After FDR correction, there were no differences in metabolic features between infants whose mothers received prenatal DHA (n = 58) and those whose mothers received placebo (n = 54). However, we identified 343 differentially expressed features in the interaction analysis after FDR correction. DHA supplementation positively enriched amino acid and aminosugars metabolism pathways and decreased fatty acid metabolism pathways among offspring of minor allele carriers and decreased metabolites within the tricarboxylic acid cycle and galactose metabolism pathways among offspring of noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate differences in infant metabolism in response to prenatal DHA supplementation by maternal SNP rs174602 and further support the need to incorporate genetic analysis of FADS polymorphisms into DHA

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Evidence report/technology assessment (2016) PMID: 30307735 ↗
Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Maternal and Child Health: An Updated Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Systematic Review published in Evidence report/technology assessment. Key conclusion: Supplementation with DHA, or EPA plus DHA-, or DHA-enriched fish oil does not decreaserisk for preterm birth (low SoE).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To update a prior systematic review on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) on maternal and child health and to assess the evidence for their effects on, and associations with, additional outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences (CAB) Abstracts from 2000 to August 2015; eligible studies from the original report; and relevant systematic reviews. REVIEW METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of any defined dose of n-3 FA (or combination) compared to placebo, any other n-3 FA, or alternative dose with an outcome of interest conducted in pregnant or breastfeeding women or neonates (preterm or term). We also included prospective observational studies that analyzed the association between baseline n-3 FA intake or biomarker level and followup outcomes. Postnatal interventions began within a week of birth for term infants and within a week of beginning enteral or oral feeding for preterm infants. Standard methods were used for data abstraction and analysis, according to the Evidence-based Practice Center Methods Guide. RESULTS: We identified 4,275 potentially relevant titles from our searches, of which 95 RCTs and 48 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was a concern with both RCTs and observational studies. Outcomes for which evidence was sufficient to draw a conclusion are summarized here with the Strength of Evidence (SoE). (Outcomes for which the evidence was insufficient to draw a conclusion are summarized in Appendix G of the report.). Maternal Exposures and Outcomes: Gestational length and risk for preterm birth: Prenatal algal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or DHA-enriched fish oil supplementation had a small positive effect on length of gestation (moderate SoE), but no effect on risk for preterm birth (low SoE). Prenatal EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) plus DHA-containing fish oil supplementation has no effect on length of gestation (low SoE). Supplementation with DHA, or EPA plus DHA-, or DHA-enriched fish oil does not decreaserisk for preterm birth (low SoE). Birth wei

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of tropical pediatrics (2026) PMID: 41847904 ↗
Effect of high-docosahexaenoic acid omega-3 supplementation in low-risk pregnant women on maternal and neonatal health outcomes in Southeast Brazil: a randomized clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of tropical pediatrics involving n = 30 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Despite well-documented benefits of omega-3 for maternal and child health, evidence on high-docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation in low-risk pregnant women is limited. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among low-risk pregnant women aged 20-40 years at 22-24 weeks of gestation to evaluate the effects of high-DHA omega-3 supplementation on maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The control group (CG, n = 30) received oral olive oil supplementation, and the intervention group (IG, n = 30) received omega-3 [1700 mg, 260 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and 1440 mg of DHA] for ∼16 weeks or until delivery. Maternal and neonatal health outcomes were collected by telephone 15 days after delivery. Forty-five pregnant women completed the study (IG: 20; CG: 25). Adherence to supplementation was above 90% and did not differ between groups (P > .05). There were no differences between groups in mean gestational age (CG: 39.3 ± 1.6; IG: 39.2 ± 1.6; P = .877), adequate gestational weight gain (CG: 24.0%; IG: 50.0%; P = .088), adequate gestational BMI before delivery (CG: 33.3%; IG: 27.8%; P = .261), vaginal delivery (CG: 72.0%; IG: 60.0%; P = .396), full-term birth (CG: 92%; IG: 90%; P = .815), adequate weight (CG: 91.3%; IG: 94.7%; P = .237), and adequate length for gestational age (CG: 82.6%; IG: 100%; P = .056). Omega-3 supplementation with a higher concentration of DHA had no effect on the maternal and neonatal health outcomes investigated in a Brazilian sample of low-risk pregnant women. Further studies are needed to evaluate this effect in pregnant women at higher nutritional risk and with low dietary intake of omega-3. © The Author(s) [2026]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) European journal of pediatrics (2025) PMID: 40072608 ↗
Can prenatal conditions impact the effect of omega-3 on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of pediatrics involving n = 271 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04 (OR 0.18). Key conclusion: • Placenta pathologies are associated with inflammation in the infants and could affect the very preterm infant's response to a high-dose D
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

To explore whether prenatal conditions (i.e. chorioamnionitis, preeclampsia or small-for-gestational age (SGA)) affect the very preterm infant's response to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), according to mode of delivery, an independent factor shown to modulate this association. Secondary exploratory analysis of the MOBYDIck randomized controlled trial (NCT02371460) evaluating the effect of a neonatal high-dose DHA supplementation through maternal breastmilk compared to placebo. Population was preterm infants born before 29 weeks of gestation in sixteen Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Primary outcome was physiological BPD based on pulse oximetry assessment. Secondary outcomes included "death or BPD"; "moderate-or-severe" BPD; severe BPD; death from any causes. Heterogeneity in the effect of DHA on outcomes was assessed by prenatal conditions and mode of delivery using generalized estimating equation logistic regression models. The trial intended to enroll 800 mothers but was stopped early for safety, likely making subgroup analysis underpowered. 230 mothers (271 infants) were included in DHA group and 226 mothers (252 infants) in placebo group. The association between high-dose DHA and BPD differed by chorioamnionitis status (heterogeneity P=0.04). In infants exposed to chorioamnionitis and vaginal delivery, DHA supplementation was associated with a reduced risk of physiological BPD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.62], P=0.007). No heterogeneity was found by maternal preeclampsia (heterogeneity P=0.44) nor SGA status (heterogeneity P=0.17). CONCLUSION: This secondary analysis generated hypotheses for a potential differential effect of neonatal enteral high-dose DHA supplementation on BPD in very preterm infants according to chorioamnionitis exposure. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The MOBYDIck trial reported a potential protective effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in infants born vaginally, but not in those born via cesarean section. • Placenta pathologies are associated with inflammation in the infants and could affect the very preterm infant's response to a high-dose D

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category