NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Prenatal Iron + Folate

WOMEN HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

Prenatal Iron + Folate is an evidence-graded women health monograph evaluated across 20 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (3 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 10 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 26,544 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 20 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 3 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 10 RCTs (0 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 26,544
Reported Trial Dosages 300 mg · 0.40 mg · 38 g
Trial Duration Range 41 weeks · 7 weeks · 12 months
Reading Time ~10 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 20 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (300 mg · 0.40 mg · 38 g) over a structured 41 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary women health clinical efficacy (20 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (15 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (10 RCTs · 0 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (3 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is Prenatal Iron + Folate & Why Does Form Matter?

Prenatal Iron + Folate is classified under WOMEN HEALTH and has been investigated across 20 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (300 mg, 0.40 mg, 38 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Prenatal Iron + Folate frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (10 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Prenatal Iron + Folate acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Prenatal Iron + Folate an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 20 PubMed studies: 3 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 10 randomized controlled trials (0 double-blind, n = 26,544 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:29880794 (2018) — "Inadequate iron stores in early term neonates." (CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize that neonates at 37-38 weeks, although considered term, are not fully mature.) • PMID:26063068 (2015) — "Prenatal Iron Supplementation Reduces Maternal Anemia, Iron Deficiency, and Iron Deficiency Anemia in a Randomized Clinical Trial in Rural China, but Iron Deficiency Remains Widespread in Mothers and Neonates." (CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal iron supplementation reduced anemia, ID, and IDA in pregnant women in rural China, but most women and >45% of neonates had ID, regardless of supplementation.) • PMID:26090001 (2015) — "Factors associated with compliance of prenatal iron folate supplementation among women in Mecha district, Western Amhara: a cross-sectional study." (Increasing female education and increasing knowledge of women about anaemia and iron folate tablets are recommended to increase compliance to iron folate supplementation.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 260630680.53 (0.43–0.66)PMID 236125151.6 (0.96–3.17)PMID 417017740.7 (0.53–0.91)PMID 408363140.23 (0.27–0.76)PMID 405332490.29PMID 404514620.95 (0.88–0.98)PMID 401905441.070.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 300 mg · 0.40 mg · 38 g · 58 g over 41 weeks · 7 weeks · 12 months · 18 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MODERATE] Levothyroxine: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:11131757). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (300 mg · 0.40 mg · 38 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 41 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Levothyroxine.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (20 Studies) · 15 Quantitative Analyses

01
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of perinatology (2018) PMID: 29880794 ↗
Inadequate iron stores in early term neonates.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of perinatology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0012. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize that neonates at 37-38 weeks, although considered term, are not fully mature.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To characterize neonatal iron stores depending on gestational age (GA) at term. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were 751 mother-newborn pairs from the placebo arm of a randomized clinical trial of prenatal iron-folate supplementation in China. We compared mean cord serum ferritin (SF) by weeks GA and, following the general linear model, assessed whether maternal iron deficiency (ID) influenced relations between GA and cord SF. RESULTS: Controlling for covariates, cord SF increased between 37 and 41 weeks (ps < 0.05-0.01). Cord SF was lower in infants of ID vs. non-ID mothers (geometric mean 96.3 [95% CI: 91.3-101.6] µg/L vs. 115.9 [95% CI: 105.0-127.8] µg/L, effect size = 0.33 SD, p = 0.0012). There was no significant increase with GA among infants of ID mothers. For non-ID mothers, cord-blood SF increased sharply with GA until 38 5/7 weeks, after which it plateaued. CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize that neonates at 37-38 weeks, although considered term, are not fully mature.

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Journal of nutrition (2015) PMID: 26063068 ↗
Prenatal Iron Supplementation Reduces Maternal Anemia, Iron Deficiency, and Iron Deficiency Anemia in a Randomized Clinical Trial in Rural China, but Iron Deficiency Remains Widespread in Mothers and Neonates.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2015 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Journal of nutrition involving n = 2,371 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05 (RR 0.53). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal iron supplementation reduced anemia, ID, and IDA in pregnant women in rural China, but most women and >45% of neonates had ID, regardless of supplementation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Previous trials of prenatal iron supplementation had limited measures of maternal or neonatal iron status. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to assess effects of prenatal iron-folate supplementation on maternal and neonatal iron status. METHODS: Enrollment occurred June 2009 through December 2011 in Hebei, China. Women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at ≤20 wk gestation, aged ≥18 y, and with hemoglobin ≥100 g/L were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive daily iron (300 mg ferrous sulfate) or placebo + 0.40 mg folate from enrollment to birth. Iron status was assessed in maternal venous blood (at enrollment and at or near term) and cord blood. Primary outcomes were as follows: 1) maternal iron deficiency (ID) defined in 2 ways as serum ferritin (SF) <15 μg/L and body iron (BI) <0 mg/kg; 2) maternal ID anemia [ID + anemia (IDA); hemoglobin <110 g/L]; and 3) neonatal ID (cord blood ferritin <75 μg/L or zinc protoporphyrin/heme >118 μmol/mol). RESULTS: A total of 2371 women were randomly assigned, with outcomes for 1632 women or neonates (809 placebo/folate, 823 iron/folate; 1579 mother-newborn pairs, 37 mothers, 16 neonates). Most infants (97%) were born at term. At or near term, maternal hemoglobin was significantly higher (+5.56 g/L) for iron vs. placebo groups. Anemia risk was reduced (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.66), as were risks of ID (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.79 by SF; RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.71 by BI) and IDA (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.62 by SF; RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.65 by BI). Most women still had ID (66.8% by SF, 54.7% by BI). Adverse effects, all minor, were similar by group. There were no differences in cord blood iron measures; >45% of neonates in each group had ID. However, dose-response analyses showed higher cord SF with more maternal iron capsules reported being consumed (β per 10 capsules = 2.60, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal iron supplementation reduced anemia, ID, and IDA in pregnant women in rural China, but most women and >45% of neonates had ID, regardless of supplementation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221752. © 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

03
CLINICAL STUDY The Pan African medical journal (2015) PMID: 26090001 ↗
Factors associated with compliance of prenatal iron folate supplementation among women in Mecha district, Western Amhara: a cross-sectional study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2015 Clinical Study published in The Pan African medical journal involving n = 634 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Increasing female education and increasing knowledge of women about anaemia and iron folate tablets are recommended to increase compliance to iron folate supplementation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Iron and folate supplementation can effectively control and prevent anaemia in pregnancy. In Ethiopia, all pregnant women are prescribed iron folate during their ANC visit. However, limited adherence is thought to be a major reason for the low effectiveness of iron supplementation programs. Therefore this study was done to investigate factors associated with compliance of prenatal iron folate supplementation among women who gave birth in the last 12 months before the survey in Mecha district. METHODS: Community based cross sectional study design was employed in Mecha district from June 25 - July 15/2013. A sample of 634 women who gave birth 12 months before the survey was included in the study. Study participants were selected by systematic random sampling technique after allocating the total sample to each kebele proportionally. Data were collected using a pre-tested structured Amharic questionnaire. Collected data were edited, coded and entered to Epi info version 3.1 and exported to' SPSS version 16. Bivariate and multivariable analysis was computed. RESULTS: A total of 628 women who gave birth twelve months before the survey were enrolled. In this study only 20.4% of participants were compliant with iron foliate supplementation. In multivariable analysis, age of the mother, educational status of the mother, knowledge of anaemia and iron folate tablets, and history of anaemia during pregnancy were significantly associated with compliance to iron folate supplementation (P<.05). Belief that too many tablets would harm the baby and fear of side effects were the major reasons given for noncompliance. CONCLUSION: Compliance to iron folate supplementation is very low in the study area. Increasing female education and increasing knowledge of women about anaemia and iron folate tablets are recommended to increase compliance to iron folate supplementation.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Health services insights (2021) PMID: 34376992 ↗
Anemia among Pregnant Women Attending Ante Natal Care Clinic in Adare General Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: Prevalence and Associated Factors.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Clinical Study published in Health services insights; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05 (OR 2.08). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Anemia had moderate public health significance in the study.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a global public health problem affecting both developing and developed countries. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and children. Nevertheless, information regarding the prevalence of anemia and associated factors among pregnant in the study area is limited. Therefore, this study was aimed to assess the prevalence of anemia and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care clinic in Adare General Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. METHOD: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1, 2020, to December 15, 2020, among 340 pregnant women aged 15 to 49 years who came for focused antenatal care follow-up. Trained data collectors administered questionnaires, and collected capillary blood and stool samples. Data were coded and entered into EPI Info 7 and the analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0. Factors associated with anemia were assessed using binary logistic regression. Those variables that had a P-value less than .25 on bi-variable regression analysis were considered for multi-variable regression analysis. Statistical significance was declared with P < .05. RESULT: The prevalence of anemia among pregnant women was 24.1% (95% CI: 19.55%-28.69%). The majority of anemia cases were mildly anemic (62.2.0%). Increased odds of anemia was found among pregnant women with household monthly income ⩽2550 Ethiopian Birr (⩽69.67 United States Dollar) (AOR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.15, 3.76), not attended formal education (AOR = 3.86; 95% CI: 1.42, 10.54), not using iron tablets (AOR = 2.64; 95% CI: 1.33, 5.27) and infected with Plasmodium vivax (AOR = 7.58; 95% CI: 3.11, 18.47). CONCLUSIONS: Anemia had moderate public health significance in the study. Low monthly family income, educational status, iron tablet consumption during pregnancy and Plasmodium vivax infection were found to be independent predictors for anemia in pregnancy. The burden of anemia should be alleviated through enhancing maternal socio-economic status, prevention of illnesses targeting pregnant women, and strengthening the expansion of prenatal iron-folate supplementation. © The Author(s) 2021.

05
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of clinical nutrition (2013) PMID: 23612515 ↗
Determinants of anemia in postpartum HIV-negative women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2013 Clinical Study published in European journal of clinical nutrition involving n = 292 participants (RR 1.6). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Maternal nutritional status during pregnancy, prenatal iron/folate supplementation, perinatal care, and prevention and management of infections, such as malaria, are modifiable risk factors for the occurrence of, and recovery from, anemia.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: The determinants of anemia during both pregnancy and postpartum recovery remain incompletely understood in sub-Saharan African women. SUBJECTS/METHODS: In a prospective cohort study among pregnant women, we assessed dietary, biochemical, anthropometric, infectious and sociodemographic factors at baseline. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, we examined predictors of incident anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dl) and iron deficiency anemia (anemia plus mean corpuscular volume <80fL), and recovery from anemia and iron deficiency anemia through 18 months postpartum at antenatal clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania between 2001 and 2005. A total of 2364 non-anemic pregnant women and 4884 anemic women were enrolled between 12 and 27 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: In total, 292 women developed anemia during the postpartum period and 165 developed iron deficiency anemia, whereas 2982 recovered from baseline anemia and 2044 from iron deficiency anemia. Risk factors for postpartum anemia were delivery complications (RR 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13, 2.22) and low postpartum CD4 cell count (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.96, 3.17). Iron/folate supplementation during pregnancy had a protective relationship with the incidence of iron deficiency anemia. Absence of delivery complications, education status and iron/folate supplementation were positively associated with time to recovery from iron deficiency. CONCLUSION: Maternal nutritional status during pregnancy, prenatal iron/folate supplementation, perinatal care, and prevention and management of infections, such as malaria, are modifiable risk factors for the occurrence of, and recovery from, anemia.

06
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW BMJ global health (2026) PMID: 41927311 ↗
The effects of antenatal interventions on gestational weight gain in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in BMJ global health. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Well-structured antenatal interventions, initiated before 20 weeks of gestation and continuing beyond this period, tailored to loca
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy is a critical factor that affects maternal and child health outcomes. The considerable burden of inadequate GWG and the rising tide of excessive GWG are overlooked challenges in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: This systematic review assessed the impact of antenatal interventions on GWG in LMICs. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on antenatal interventions on GWG in LMICs were included. These interventions included educational, behavioural, nutritional supplementation and pharmacological therapies. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from the start of each database through September 2025. RESULTS: Out of the 33 642 unique articles identified, 70 articles were included in our systematic review, with 59 individual RCTs and 11 cluster RCTs. Nutritional interventions (31 studies) included food and micronutrient supplementations. Micronutrient supplementation such as multiple micronutrient supplementations was found to reduce the risk of severely inadequate or inadequate GWG among pregnant women compared to iron only or iron and folic acid supplementation (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE]: moderate certainty). Food supplementation showed mixed results, although most trials demonstrated higher mean GWG among undernourished pregnant women and a greater likelihood of achieving Institute of Medicine-recommended ranges (GRADE: moderate certainty). Behavioural (counselling/education) interventions (20 studies) were associated with significant reductions in excessive GWG among pregnant women with overweight or obesity and improved adequacy of GWG (GRADE: moderate certainty). Physical activity (seven studies) was found to reduce the risk of excessive GWG (GRADE: moderate certainty). Combined dietary and physical activity interventions (six studies) were found to reduce the risk of excessive GWG among pregnant women (GRADE: low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Well-structured antenatal interventions, initiated before 20 weeks of gestation and continuing beyond this period, tailored to loca

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Lancet. Global health (2026) PMID: 41871585 ↗
Effect on birthweight of an antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation programme compared with iron-folic acid supplementation: a cluster-randomised, controlled trial in 85 698 Ethiopian women.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Lancet. Global health. Key conclusion: INTERPRETATION: The findings of this trial are consistent with those from efficacy trials in other settings, indicating that the transition from IFA to MMS as part of routine antenatal care in Ethiopia could lead to a small but clear improvement in birthweig
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) including iron, folic acid, and other essential micronutrients, has shown potential to improve birth outcomes in controlled studies. We did an effectiveness study in Ethiopia to determine the effect on mean birthweight of MMS provided as part of routine antenatal care, relative to iron-folic acid supplementation (IFA). METHODS: A pragmatic, two-arm, facility-based, cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted across 42 districts in five regions of Ethiopia to determine the effect on birthweight of MMS relative to IFA. Districts were randomly assigned to either retain IFA as part of routine antenatal care or switch to MMS. Randomisation was stratified by region and done using a random number generator within statistical software. All live singleton births at participating health facilities were eligible for inclusion and birthweights were recorded. Additionally, data were collected on maternal receipt and utilisation of MMS or IFA. The primary outcome was birthweight, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This completed trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05708183. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2023, and Dec 31, 2024, birthweights were recorded for 47 325 babies in the 21 IFA districts and 36 473 babies in the 21 MMS districts. Mean age of mothers was 26·2 years (SD 5·3) and median gestational age of babies at birth was 38 weeks (IQR 38-39). The effect of MMS on birthweight was a mean increase of 38 g (95% CI 20-55) in the MMS arm relative to the IFA arm after adjustment for time, geographical region stratification factor, gestational age, sex of baby, and parity. Among women who reported taking at least 90 tablets of their assigned supplement, the increase in mean birthweight in the MMS arm relative to the IFA arm was 58 g (38-79). Stillbirth risk was 7·5 per 1000 births in the IFA arm and 6·9 per 1000 births in the MMS arm. INTERPRETATION: The findings of this trial are consistent with those from efficacy trials in other settings, indicating that the transition from IFA to MMS as part of routine antenatal care in Ethiopia could lead to a small but clear improvement in birthweig

08
META-ANALYSIS PLoS medicine (2026) PMID: 41701774 ↗
The effect of prenatal balanced energy and protein supplementation on small vulnerable newborn types in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in PLoS medicine involving n = 10,252 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.009 (RR 0.7). Key conclusion: In the four-group categorization, prenatal BEP supplementation led to a 31% lower risk of preterm-SGA (RR: 0.69; 95% CI [0.52, 0.91]; P = 0.008) and a 12% lower risk of term-SGA (RR: 0.88; 95% CI [0.81, 0.96]; P = 0.005).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Small vulnerable newborn (SVN) types, defined by combinations of being born too soon or too small, have distinct determinants, health consequences, and prevention strategies. The effects of prenatal balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplementation on SVN types remain unknown. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from eight randomized controlled trials of prenatal BEP supplements (N = 10,252, with 5,164 in the BEP arm and 5,088 in the control arm) in low- and middle-income countries were used. The control arms varied across studies and included context-specific standards of care, iron and folic acid supplements, or multiple micronutrient supplements. Newborns were classified into 10 groups through the combinations of preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, and low birthweight (LBW), such as term-appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA)-nonLBW, preterm-SGA-LBW, preterm-large-for-gestational-age-LBW, term-SGA-LBW, preterm-AGA-nonLBW, and other permutations. Newborns were also analyzed using a four-group categorization that included term-nonSGA, preterm-nonSGA, term-SGA, and preterm-SGA. Log-binomial models were used to estimate study-specific risk ratios (RRs), which were pooled using meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted by maternal age, parity, gestational age at enrollment, early pregnancy body mass index, and maternal anemia status. In the 10-group categorization of SVNs, on average, prenatal BEP supplementation led to a 30% lower risk of preterm-SGA-LBW (RR: 0.70; 95% CI [0.53, 0.91]; P = 0.009), a 25% lower risk of preterm-AGA-LBW (RR: 0.75; 95% CI [0.60, 0.93]; P = 0.009), and a 20% lower risk of term-SGA-LBW (RR: 0.80; 95% CI [0.72, 0.90]; P < 0.001). In the four-group categorization, prenatal BEP supplementation led to a 31% lower risk of preterm-SGA (RR: 0.69; 95% CI [0.52, 0.91]; P = 0.008) and a 12% lower risk of term-SGA (RR: 0.88; 95% CI [0.81, 0.96]; P = 0.005). The protective effect of prenatal BEP supplementation on preterm-SGA was stronger among multiparous women and women without anemia. The protective effects on all three SVN types under the four

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) BMC public health (2025) PMID: 41275168 ↗
Associations of antenatal micronutrient supplementation with adolescent blood pressure: evidence from a 14-year follow-up study of a randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in BMC public health. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Compared with folic acid alone, antenatal MMNs supplementation was associated with lower adolescent SBP.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: This study directly examined the effects of antenatal micronutrient supplementation on adolescent blood pressure (BP). METHODS: This study involved adolescents from two rural counties in western China. Their mothers had previously participated in a cluster-randomized trial of antenatal micronutrient supplementation. All pregnant women were randomized to take a daily capsule of folic acid (FA) as control, folic acid plus iron (IFA), or multiple micronutrients (MMNs) until delivery. Adolescent BP was assessed using a validated electronic sphygmomanometer and converted into percentiles by population reference. We examined the effects of antenatal micronutrient supplementation on adolescent BP and BP percentiles using generalized estimation equations. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to examine the associations between antenatal micronutrient supplementation and categorical BP outcomes, with relative risk reduction estimated. RESULTS: Among 4488 singleton births eligible for long-term follow-up, 1994 (44.4%) adolescents were followed, and among them, 59.2% were male, with a mean age of 11.73 (SD, 0.86) years old. After adjusting for a range of covariates, antenatal MMNs supplementation relative to FA alone was associated with a 1.13 (95% CI -2.09, -0.17) mmHg lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and a 2.59 (95% CI -5.01, -0.17) points lower SBP percentile. The similar benefits of MMNs were observed for categorized adolescent high BP (SBP and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ the 95th percentile for age, sex, and height). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with folic acid alone, antenatal MMNs supplementation was associated with lower adolescent SBP. This finding suggests that comprehensive antenatal nutritional interventions may offer a potential strategy for the primordial prevention of hypertension in offspring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN08850194, retrospectively registered December 14, 2006. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN08850194?q=ISRCTN08850194&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10 . © 2025. The Author(s).

10
CLINICAL STUDY Trials (2025) PMID: 41233886 ↗
Non-inferiority Assessment of Maternal Adherence to Supplements, a Trial on the Effects of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (NAMASTE-MMS) in Nepal: study protocol.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Trials. Key conclusion: TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06327646 (ClinicalTrials.gov, March 18, 2024 registered).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Micronutrient deficiencies among pregnant women contribute to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) has proven its superiority when compared to the standard iron and folic acid (IFA) supplementation for maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. The Government of Nepal is exploring the scale-up of MMS, but first requires evidence such as on its adherence and acceptability. The objective of this study, thus, is to generate this needed evidence. METHODS: The Non-inferiority Assessment of Maternal Adherence to Supplements, a Trial on the Effects of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (NAMASTE-MMS) in Nepal study is a three-arm, parallel, non-inferiority cluster-randomized controlled trial (c-RCT) assessing how well pregnant women adhere to and accept different types of supplements: MMS in blister packs or bottles versus IFA in blister packs. In one of Nepal's seven provinces, Lumbini, the longitudinal NAMASTE-MMS study is being implemented across 120 health facilities (clusters), enrolling 2640 pregnant women into one of three arms: IFA-blister, MMS-blister, or MMS-bottle. The primary outcome is adherence to 180 supplements during pregnancy, measured by tablet counts with a non-inferiority margin of 13%. Secondary outcomes include comparisons of adherence between the two MMS arms and utilization of Antenatal Care (ANC), both potentially impacted by type of packaging. Exploratory outcomes include comparisons of adherence as well as the degree of acceptability to supplementation during early and mid pregnancy and post-partum. DISCUSSION: Evidence generated from this study and three related mixed-methods implementation research studies will help the government in its potential scale-up of MMS supplementation during pregnancy and lactation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06327646 (ClinicalTrials.gov, March 18, 2024 registered). © 2025. The Author(s).

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category