영문 초록 원문 (PubMed Abstract) 펼쳐보기 ↓
IMPORTANCE: Available antidepressants provide inadequate therapeutic responses in many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), highlighting a substantial unmet need. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of azetukalner, a novel, potent KV7 potassium channel opener, in participants with MDD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: X-NOVA was a multicenter, proof-of-concept, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial that evaluated azetukalner in participants (adults aged ≥18 to ≤65 years) with moderate to severe MDD in a current depressive episode. Participants were enrolled between April 2022 and October 2023, and data analysis occurred from January 2023 to January 2024. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to 10 mg of azetukalner, 20 mg of azetukalner, or placebo orally once daily with food for 6 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up. Concomitant antidepressant medications were not permitted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at week 6. Secondary end points included change from baseline at week 6 in the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Exploratory end points included change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 17-Item (HAM-D17) score and change in MADRS at week 1. Frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Altogether, 168 participants were randomized (56 to placebo, 56 to 10 mg of azetukalner, and 56 to 20 mg of azetukalner); mean (SD) age was 47.2 (13.6) years, and 111 participants (66.5%) were female. The modified intent-to-treat and safety populations consisted of 164 and 167 participants, respectively. The mean (SE) reduction in MADRS scores from baseline to week 6 was -13.90 (1.41) points with placebo, -15.61 (1.34) points with 10 mg of azetukalner, and -16.94 (1.45) points with 20 mg of azetukalner; the mean (SE) reduction with 20 mg of azetukalner vs placebo was clinically meaningful but not statistically significant (-3.04 points; 95% CI, -7.04 to 0.96 points; P = .14) at week 6, while significant at week 1 (-2.66 p