NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Berberine

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Berberine is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 20,869 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 10 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 20,869
Reported Trial Dosages 1000 mg/day · 1 g/day · 1500 mg/day
Trial Duration Range 5 weeks · 24 weeks · 6 months
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1000 mg/day · 1 g/day · 1500 mg/day) over a structured 5 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (14 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (6 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (10 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Berberine & Why Does Form Matter?

Berberine is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1000 mg/day, 1 g/day, 1500 mg/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Berberine frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Berberine acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Berberine an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 20,869 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:37675930 (2023) — "Effects of berberine and barberry on selected inflammatory biomarkers in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials." (There are limitations to our findings, including low-quality studies and significant heterogeneity.) • PMID:37598753 (2023) — "Overall and Sex-Specific Effect of Berberine on Glycemic and Insulin-Related Traits: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." (Berberine can be considered as a complementary intervention in individuals who may benefit from modest improvements in glucose metabolism and who prefer taking a nutraceutical.) • PMID:36941490 (2023) — "Overall and Sex-Specific Effect of Berberine for the Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials." (Berberine increased HDL cholesterol by 0.06 mmol/L (95% CI 0.00 to 0.11, 15 studies, n = 1471).)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 37598753-0.21 (-0.72–-0.33)PMID 35623810-0.44 (-1.67–0.89)PMID 33669333-25.07PMID 32690176-2.07 (-3.09–-1.05)-29Null (0)4.8Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1000 mg/day · 1 g/day · 1500 mg/day · 500 mg over 5 weeks · 24 weeks · 6 months · 12 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MAJOR] Cyclosporine / Metformin / CYP3A4: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:16231263, PMID:22183189). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1000 mg/day · 1 g/day · 1500 mg/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 5 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Cyclosporine / Metformin / CYP3A4.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Phytotherapy research (2023) PMID: 37675930 ↗
Effects of berberine and barberry on selected inflammatory biomarkers in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Phytotherapy research involving n = 1,600 participants. Key conclusion: There are limitations to our findings, including low-quality studies and significant heterogeneity.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The previous meta-analysis showed an advantageous effect of berberine supplementation on interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations; however, it is unknown the dosage that this component influences inflammatory biomarkers. A comprehensive search was done in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science until September 2022 to find randomized controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the effects of berberine/barberry on IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in adults but not trials without a control group. Studies bias was assessed using RoB 2. A random-effects model was performed to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD). A dose-dependent effect was calculated. Eighteen clinical trials with 1600 participants were included in the current meta-analysis. These interventions significantly mitigate IL-6 levels (-1.18 pg/mL), TNF-α levels (-3.72 pg/mL), and CRP levels (-1.33 mg/L). In addition, the non-linear analysis showed a significant lowering effect of berberine/barberry on IL-6 and TNF-α levels in doses <1000 mg/day and less than 5 weeks of intervention. There are limitations to our findings, including low-quality studies and significant heterogeneity. These interventions might be considered adjunct therapy to managing inflammation status. However, more investigation and high-quality evidence must be conducted to obtain more comprehensive and generalizable results. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

02
META-ANALYSIS The Journal of nutrition (2023) PMID: 37598753 ↗
Overall and Sex-Specific Effect of Berberine on Glycemic and Insulin-Related Traits: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in The Journal of nutrition involving n = 1,761 participants (MD -0.21). Key conclusion: Berberine can be considered as a complementary intervention in individuals who may benefit from modest improvements in glucose metabolism and who prefer taking a nutraceutical.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Berberine is widely available as a nutraceutical supplement for improving glucose metabolism. Berberine affects sex hormones, raising the possibility that its effects on glycemic traits and insulin sensitivity have sex disparity which has been overlooked. OBJECTIVE: To assess the overall and sex-specific effects of berberine on glycemic- and insulin-related traits. METHODS: We identified randomized trials of berberine versus placebo from Medline, Embase, CNKI, clinical trial registries and previous systematic reviews. Mean differences were estimated using inverse-variance weighting with random effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex, diabetes diagnosis, trial duration, berberine dose and ethnicity. RESULTS: We identified 20 eligible studies (n = 1761). Berberine lowered fasting glucose (-0.52 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.33; 18 studies, n = 1522), HbA1c (-4.48 mmol/mol, 95% CI -6.53 to -2.44, 7 studies, n = 756), fasting insulin (-2.36 mU/L, 95% CI -3.64 to -1.08, 11 studies, n = 966), HOMA-IR (-0.85, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.53,12 studies, n = 1065), and 2-h postprandial glucose (-1.81 mmol/L, 95% CI -2.37 to -1.24, 4 studies, n = 501). Effects on fasting glucose and HOMA-IR showed potential differences by sex, with larger reductions in women than in men. Comparing 4 studies conducted in women to one study conducted in men, the mean difference was -0.21 mmol/L (95% CI -0.41 to -0.00) for fasting glucose and -0.97 (95% CI -1.84 to -0.10) for HOMA-IR. We also found larger reductions in fasting glucose in participants with diabetes and in Asians. CONCLUSION: Berberine is effective in improving glucose metabolism and may result in larger effects on fasting glucose in women, in people with diabetes and in Asians, but subgroup comparisons remain to be replicated given the limited number of studies. Berberine can be considered as a complementary intervention in individuals who may benefit from modest improvements in glucose metabolism and who prefer taking a nutraceutical. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022345172).

03
META-ANALYSIS Drugs (2023) PMID: 36941490 ↗
Overall and Sex-Specific Effect of Berberine for the Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Drugs involving n = 1,788 participants. Key conclusion: Berberine increased HDL cholesterol by 0.06 mmol/L (95% CI 0.00 to 0.11, 15 studies, n = 1471).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Berberine is a nutraceutical that can improve lipid metabolism. Berberine may also affect sex hormones and exert sex-specific lipid-modifying effects, which have been overlooked. This study aimed to comprehensively review the efficacy and safety of berberine in adults for the treatment of dyslipidemia with consideration of potential sex disparity. Data Sources We searched Medline, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to 13 December 2022. No language restrictions were applied. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021293218) prior to completing the literature search. Study Selection Two blinded reviewers assessed studies for inclusion. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials in adults that compared berberine versus placebo, and measured blood lipids or lipoproteins. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction was performed by two blinded reviewers using a structured form in Covidence. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Mean differences (MD) were estimated using inverse variance weighting with random effects models for lipid outcomes using R. Adverse events (AEs) were described narratively. Main Outcomes Primary outcomes were low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B. Secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal and muscle-related AEs. RESULTS: Eighteen studies (n = 1788 participants), conducted mainly in mainland China and Hong Kong (15 studies [83%]), were included with treatment durations ranging from 4 to 24 weeks. Berberine reduced LDL cholesterol (- 0.46 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.62 to - 0.30, 14 studies, n = 1447), total cholesterol (- 0.48 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.63 to - 0.33, 17 studies, n = 1637), triglycerides (- 0.34 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.46 to - 0.23, 18 studies, n = 1661) and apolipoprotein B (- 0.25 g/L, 95% CI - 0.40 to - 0.11, 2 studies, n = 127). Berberine increased HDL cholesterol by 0.06 mmol/L (95% CI 0.00 to 0.11, 15 studies, n = 1471). Notably, the effect on HDL cholesterol was different in women (0.11

04
META-ANALYSIS International journal of molecular sciences (2023) PMID: 36834497 ↗
Effects of Berries, Phytochemicals, and Probiotics on Atherosclerosis through Gut Microbiota Modification: A Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of molecular sciences. Key conclusion: Thus, consumption of functional foods rich in phytochemicals as well as probiotics are viable interventions to improve gut health and reduce plaque burden in patients suffering from cardiovascular disease (CVD).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Atherosclerosis is a major cause of death and disability. The beneficial effects of phytochemicals and probiotics on atherosclerosis have gained significant interest since these functional foods can improve inflammation, oxidative stress, and microbiome dysbiosis. The direct effect of the microbiome in atherosclerosis, however, needs further elucidation. The objective of this work was to investigate the effects of polyphenols, alkaloids, and probiotics on atherosclerosis using a meta-analysis of studies with mouse models of atherosclerosis. Identification of eligible studies was conducted through searches on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Science Direct until November 2022. The results showed that phytochemicals reduced atherosclerosis, which was significant in male mice, but not in females. Probiotics, on the other hand, showed significant reductions in plaque in both sexes. Berries and phytochemicals modulated gut microbial composition by reducing the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio and by upregulating health-promoting bacteria, including Akkermansia muciniphila. This analysis suggests that phytochemicals and probiotics can reduce atherosclerosis in animal models, with a potentially greater effect on male animals. Thus, consumption of functional foods rich in phytochemicals as well as probiotics are viable interventions to improve gut health and reduce plaque burden in patients suffering from cardiovascular disease (CVD).

05
META-ANALYSIS Pharmacological research (2022) PMID: 36195307 ↗
Protective effect of berberine in diabetic nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis revealing the mechanism of action.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Pharmacological research. Key conclusion: Meanwhile, berberine also improved inflammatory indicators, such as IL-6 and TNF-α, and oxidative stress indicators, such as the superoxide dismutase activity and malondialdehyde content.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Coptis Chinensis Franch is widely used in the treatment of diabetes, and berberine is the primary bioactive component in it. Evidence from previous studies has shown that berberine supplementation is effective for treating diabetic nephropathy (DN) in animal models. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the effects and potential mechanisms of action of berberine in animal models of DN. Relevant studies were searched from the English language databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase starting from the establishment of the database till June 2022. Twenty-five studies were included, and the risk of bias tool from SYRCLE was used to assess the methodological quality. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA 15.1. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (SCR), and the kidney index (KI) were the primary outcomes to be analyzed. The overall results showed that berberine improves the indicators of renal function, such as BUN, SCR, proteinuria, and KI. Meanwhile, berberine also improved inflammatory indicators, such as IL-6 and TNF-α, and oxidative stress indicators, such as the superoxide dismutase activity and malondialdehyde content. Additionally, berberine lowered the levels of known risk factors, including triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL). These beneficial effects of berberine in DN may be related to its anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidative stress properties. However, to assess the anti-diabetic nephropathy effects and safety of berberine in a more accurate manner, additional large-scale, long-term, and high-quality preclinical trials are needed to confirm these findings before clinical application.

06
META-ANALYSIS Pharmacological research (2022) PMID: 35988871 ↗
A network meta-analysis on the comparative effect of nutraceuticals on lipid profile in adults.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Pharmacological research involving n = 13,062 participants. Key conclusion: In conclusion, bergamot and RYR appear to be the most effective nutraceuticals in terms of LDL-C and TC reduction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

It is estimated that 2.6 million deaths worldwide can be attributed to hypercholesterolemia. The main reason for non-adherence to statin therapy are the statin-associated muscle symptoms (including nocebo/drucebo effect). In this case, apart from ezetimibe, nutraceuticals are prescribed. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of different nutraceuticals in terms of lowering low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and improving lipid profile. Electronic and hand searches were performed until February 2021. The inclusion criteria were the following: (1) randomized trial with any of the reportedly LDL-C lowering nutraceutical: artichoke, berberine, bergamot, garlic, green tea extract, plant sterols/stanols, policosanols, red yeast rice (RYR), silymarin or spirulina. (2) outcome either LDL-C (primary outcome), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or serum triglycerides (TG). Random effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to rank the effect of each intervention using frequentist approach. Finally, a total of 131 trials enrolling 13,062 participants were included. All analysed nutraceuticals except for policosanols were more effective in lowering LDL-C (-1.21 [-46.8 mg/dL] to -0.17 [-6.6 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction) and TC (-1.75 [-67.7 mg/dL] to -0.18 [7 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction) than placebo/no intervention. The most effective approaches in terms of LDL-C- and TC-lowering were bergamot and RYR (-1.21 [-46.8 mg/dl] and -0.94 [-36.4 mg/dl] mmol/l) reduction respectively. In conclusion, bergamot and RYR appear to be the most effective nutraceuticals in terms of LDL-C and TC reduction. Evidence for bergamot effect was based on relatively small study group and may require further investigations. Policosanols have no effect on the lipid profile.

07
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2022) PMID: 35623810 ↗
Effects berberine-silymarin on liver enzymes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 549 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.55 (MD -0.44). Key conclusion: Further clinical trials with high quality according to the challenges mentioned seem to be helpful to use BBR-silymarin as a supplement for improving liver function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite controversies, no study has systematically summarized findings from earlier studies on the effect of berberine (BBR)-silymarin on liver enzymes. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of berberis aristate and Silybum marianum on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in adults. METHODS: Relevant studies, published up to June 2021, were searched through PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE and Google Scholar. The mean differences and standard deviations were pooled using a random-effects model. The studies' quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Out of 80 citations, 5 trials that enrolled 549 participants were included. Berberis aristate and Silybum marianum resulted in no statistically significant change in ALT (weighted mean differences (WMD): -0.39 mg/dl; 95% CI: -1.67 to 0.89, P = 0.55), and AST (WMD: -0.44 mg/dl; 95% CI: -2.02 to 1.14, P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: We did not find any significant reduction in liver enzymes following BBR-silymarin consumption in adults. Further clinical trials with high quality according to the challenges mentioned seem to be helpful to use BBR-silymarin as a supplement for improving liver function.

08
META-ANALYSIS Journal of ethnopharmacology (2022) PMID: 34509605 ↗
Efficacy and safety of berberine in preventing recurrence of colorectal adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of ethnopharmacology involving n = 1,076 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (RR 0.69). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Generally, the present study indicated that BBR has a comparable therapeutic effect on
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Berberine(BBR) is a kind of isoquinoline alkaloids extracted from the rhizomes of Coptis chinensis Franch., which was the main active ingredient. Accumulating evidence has shown that it has potential pharmacological effects in preventing the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. AIM OF THE STUDY: The roles of BBR in the overall recurrence of colorectal adenoma have still not been assessed because of the limitations of the available data and the restriction of a single study. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of BBR in preventing the recurrence of colorectal adenomas through a systematic review and meta-analysis of available data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched four English databases (PubMed (MEDLINE), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and Web of Science) and four Chinese language databases (Chinese Biomedicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP) and the WanFang Database) from their inception through October 2020. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan5.3 software after data extraction and the quality of studies assessment. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled clinical trials were included with 1076 patients. Our results illustrated that 1-year and 2-year supplementation with BBR was associated with lower recurrence rate of colorectal adenoma (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84, p=0.0001; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88, p=0.0004). The relative risk of oral BBR for 1 year and 2 years is not comparable, for 2-year efficacy outcomes were assessed in all participants who had at least one colonoscopy with pathological evaluation after baseline (lots of participants completed the first colonoscopy but discontinued during the second follow-up interval.). Moreover, the results also suggest that BBR had more adverse events than placebo (RR 2.91, 95% CI 1.24 to 6.85, p=0.01). Through the full-text reading, no serious adverse events were observed, and constipation was the most common event which disappears once the drug is discontinued. CONCLUSION: Generally, the present study indicated that BBR has a comparable therapeutic effect on

09
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2021) PMID: 33669333 ↗
Efficacy and Safety of Armolipid Plus(®): An Updated PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.008 (MD -25.07). Key conclusion: These changes are consistent with improved cardiometabolic health.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Armolipid Plus® is a multi-constituent nutraceutical that claims to improve lipid profiles. The aim of this PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was to globally evaluate the efficacy and safety of Armolipid Plus® on the basis of the available randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trials (RCTs). A systematic literature search in several databases was conducted in order to identify RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of dietary supplementation with Armolipid Plus®. Two review authors independently identified 12 eligible studies (1050 included subjects overall) and extracted data on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Meta-analysis of the data suggested that dietary supplementation with Armolipid Plus® exerted a significant effect on body mass index (mean difference (MD) = -0.25 kg/m2, p = 0.008) and serum levels of total cholesterol (MD = -25.07 mg/dL, p < 0.001), triglycerides (MD = -11.47 mg/dL, p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD = 1.84 mg/dL, p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD = -26.67 mg/dL, p < 0.001), high sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP, MD = -0.61 mg/L, p = 0.022), and fasting glucose (MD = -3.52 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Armolipid Plus® was well tolerated. This meta-analysis demonstrates that dietary supplementation with Armolipid Plus® is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in serum lipids, glucose, and hs-CRP. These changes are consistent with improved cardiometabolic health.

10
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2020) PMID: 32690176 ↗
The effect of berberine supplementation on obesity parameters, inflammation and liver function enzymes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -2.07). Key conclusion: Berberine administration had no significant effect on ALT and AST levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: So far, no study has summarized the findings on the effects of berberine intake on anthropometric parameters, C-reactive protein (CRP) and liver enzymes. This systematic review and meta-analysis were done based upon randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to analyze the effects of berberine on anthropometric parameters, CRP and liver enzymes. METHOD: Following databases were searched for eligible studies published from inception to 30 July 2019: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Google scholar. Necessary data were extracted. Data were pooled by the inverse variance method and expressed as mean difference with 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI). RESULT: 12 studies were included. Berberine treatment moderately but significantly decreased body weight (WMD = -2.07 kg, 95% CI -3.09, -1.05, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (WMD = -0.47 kg/m2, 95% CI -0.70, -0.23, P < 0.001), waist circumference (WC) (WMD = -1.08 cm, 95% CI -1.97, -0.19, P = 0.018) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations (WMD = -0.42 mg/L, 95% CI -0.82, -0.03, P = 0.034). However, berberine intake did not affect liver enzymes, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (WMD = -1.66 I/U, 95% CI -3.98, 0.65, P = 0.160) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (WMD = -0.87 I/U, 95% CI -2.56, 0.82, P = 0.311). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found a significant reduction of body weight, BMI, WC and CRP levels associated with berberine intake which may have played an indirect role in improved clinical symptoms in diseases with metabolic disorders. Berberine administration had no significant effect on ALT and AST levels.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category