NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Boswellia Serrata Extract

JOINT BONE · Evidence Monograph

Boswellia Serrata Extract is an evidence-graded joint bone monograph evaluated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 7,720 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 18 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 2 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 7,720
Reported Trial Dosages 262 mg · 400 mg/day · 50 mg
Trial Duration Range 8 weeks · 2 weeks · 5 weeks
Reading Time ~9 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 18 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (262 mg · 400 mg/day · 50 mg) over a structured 8 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary joint bone clinical efficacy (18 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (15 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (5 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 2 reviews)
01

What Is Boswellia Serrata Extract & Why Does Form Matter?

Boswellia Serrata Extract is classified under JOINT BONE and has been investigated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (262 mg, 400 mg/day, 50 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Boswellia Serrata Extract frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Boswellia Serrata Extract acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Boswellia Serrata Extract an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 18 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 7,720 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:38365549 (2024) — "Efficacy evaluation of standardized Boswellia serrata extract (Aflapin(Ⓡ)) in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and sub-group meta-analysis study." (Sub-group analysis revealed that AflapinⓇ supplementation may be better in improving the symptoms of OA which needs to be confirmed by more comparative clinical studies.) • PMID:29127772 (2017) — "Interventions for treating collagenous colitis." (Clinical response occurred in 100% (4/4) of patients who received bismuth subsalicylate (nine 262 mg tablets daily for 8 weeks) compared to 0% (0/5) of patients who received placebo (1 study; 9 participants; RR 10.80, 95% CI 0.75 to 155.93; GRADE = very low).) • PMID:29018060 (2018) — "Dietary supplements for treating osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: The overall analysis including all trials showed that supplements provided moderate and clinically meaningful treatment effects on pain and function in patients with hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis at short term, although the quality of evidence was very low.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 2912777210.8 (0.75–155.93)PMID 248487321.04 (0.39–0.92)0.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 262 mg · 400 mg/day · 50 mg · 100 mg/day over 8 weeks · 2 weeks · 5 weeks · 60 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Boswellia Serrata Extract, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (262 mg · 400 mg/day · 50 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 8 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (18 Studies) · 15 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Explore (New York, N.Y.) (2024) PMID: 38365549 ↗
Efficacy evaluation of standardized Boswellia serrata extract (Aflapin(Ⓡ)) in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and sub-group meta-analysis study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Explore (New York, N.Y.) involving n = 712 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (MD -10.71). Key conclusion: Sub-group analysis revealed that AflapinⓇ supplementation may be better in improving the symptoms of OA which needs to be confirmed by more comparative clinical studies.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease characterized by pain, inflammation, and physical disability. Boswellia serrata (BS) is widely studied for its effectiveness in OA condition. Our systematic review and meta-analysis study was aimed to evaluate BS extract efficacy in OA. A sub-group analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of a standardized BS extract (AflapinⓇ) with other BS extracts. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials, identified from three online databases, evaluating the effect of BS extracts in OA were included. Quality of studies was assessed using PEDro scale and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Pooled effect was reported as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval. Study was conducted as per the Cochrane guidelines (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023411356). RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 712 participants were included. All studies (except one) were good quality studies. BS supplementation significantly reduced VAS (MD: -10.71; p<0.00001), LFI (MD: -2.99; p<0.00001), WOMAC-pain (MD: -10.69; p<0.0001), WOMAC-stiffness (MD: -5.49; p<0.00001), and WOMAC-function (MD: -10.69; p<0.00001) scores compared to control therapy. By sub-group analysis, AflapinⓇ supplementation showed greater reduction in VAS (MD: -16.09 vs -4.68), LFI (MD: -3.81 vs -2.01), WOMAC-pain (MD: -18.68 vs -7.07), WOMAC-stiffness (MD: -14.25 vs -3.78), and WOMAC-function (MD: -14.99 vs -8.41) scores as compared to other BS therapies. CONCLUSIONS: BS supplementation is effective OA symptomatic management. Sub-group analysis revealed that AflapinⓇ supplementation may be better in improving the symptoms of OA which needs to be confirmed by more comparative clinical studies.

02
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017) PMID: 29127772 ↗
Interventions for treating collagenous colitis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 476 participants (RR 10.8). Key conclusion: Clinical response occurred in 100% (4/4) of patients who received bismuth subsalicylate (nine 262 mg tablets daily for 8 weeks) compared to 0% (0/5) of patients who received placebo (1 study; 9 participants; RR 10.80, 95% CI 0.75 to 155.93; GRADE = very low).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Collagenous colitis is a cause of chronic diarrhea. This updated review was performed to identify therapies for collagenous colitis that have been assessed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of treatments for collagenous colitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to 7 November 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs comparing a therapy with placebo or active comparator for the treatment of active or quiescent collagenous colitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently extracted by two authors. The primary outcome was clinical response or maintenance of response as defined by the included studies. Secondary outcome measures included histological response, quality of life and the occurrence of adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess bias. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve RCTs (476 participants) were included. These studies assessed bismuth subsalicylate, Boswellia serrata extract, mesalamine, cholestyramine, probiotics, prednisolone and budesonide therapy. Four studies were low risk of bias. One study assessing mesalamine and cholestyramine was judged to be high risk of bias due to no blinding. The other studies had an unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation (five studies) allocation concealment (six studies), blinding (one study), incomplete outcome data (one study) and selective outcome reporting (one study). Clinical response occurred in 100% (4/4) of patients who received bismuth subsalicylate (nine 262 mg tablets daily for 8 weeks) compared to 0% (0/5) of patients who received placebo (1 study; 9 participants; RR 10.80, 95% CI 0.75 to 155.93; GRADE = very low). Clinical response occurred in 44% (7/16) of patients who received Boswellia serrata extract (three 400 mg/day capsules for 8 weeks) compared to 27% (4/15) of patients who received placebo (1 study; 31 participants; RR 1.64, 95%

03
META-ANALYSIS British journal of sports medicine (2018) PMID: 29018060 ↗
Dietary supplements for treating osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in British journal of sports medicine. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The overall analysis including all trials showed that supplements provided moderate and clinically meaningful treatment effects on pain and function in patients with hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis at short term, although the quality of evidence was very low.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dietary supplements for patients with osteoarthritis. DESIGN: An intervention systematic review with random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from inception to April 2017. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing oral supplements with placebo for hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Of 20 supplements investigated in 69 eligible studies, 7 (collagen hydrolysate, passion fruit peel extract, Curcuma longa extract, Boswellia serrata extract, curcumin, pycnogenol and L-carnitine) demonstrated large (effect size >0.80) and clinically important effects for pain reduction at short term. Another six (undenatured type II collagen, avocado soybean unsaponifiables, methylsulfonylmethane, diacerein, glucosamine and chondroitin) revealed statistically significant improvements on pain, but were of unclear clinical importance. Only green-lipped mussel extract and undenatured type II collagen had clinically important effects on pain at medium term. No supplements were identified with clinically important effects on pain reduction at long term. Similar results were found for physical function. Chondroitin demonstrated statistically significant, but not clinically important structural improvement (effect size -0.30, -0.42 to -0.17). There were no differences between supplements and placebo for safety outcomes, except for diacerein. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation suggested a wide range of quality evidence from very low to high. CONCLUSIONS: The overall analysis including all trials showed that supplements provided moderate and clinically meaningful treatment effects on pain and function in patients with hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis at short term, although the quality of evidence was very low. Some supplements with a limited number of studies and participants suggested large treatment effects, while widely used supplements such as glucosamine and chondroitin were either i

04
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2006) PMID: 17054177 ↗
Interventions for treating collagenous colitis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2006 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 94 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.003. Key conclusion: Those randomized to active drug were more likely to have clinical (p = 0.003) and histological (p = 0.003) improvement than those assigned to placebo.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Collagenous colitis is a disorder that is recognized as a cause of chronic diarrhea. Treatment has been based mainly on anecdotal evidence. This review was performed to identify therapies for collagenous colitis that have been proven in randomized trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine effective treatments for patients with clinically active collagenous colitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Relevant papers published between 1970 and June 2006 were identified via the MEDLINE and PUBMED databases. Manual searches from the references of identified papers, as well as review papers on collagenous or microscopic colitis were performed to identify additional studies. Abstracts from major gastroenterological meetings were searched to identify research submitted in abstract form only. Finally, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Functional Bowel Disorders Group Specialized Trials Register were searched for other studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Seven randomized trials were identified. One trial studied bismuth subsalicylate (published in abstract form only), one trial studied Boswellia serrata extract (published in abstract form only), one trial studied probiotics, one trial studied prednisolone, and 3 trials studied budesonide for the therapy of collagenous colitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by each author onto 2x2 tables (treatment versus placebo and response versus no response). For therapies assessed in one trial only, p-values were derived using the chi-square test. For therapies assessed in more than one trial, summary test statistics were derived using the Peto odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Data were combined for analysis only if the outcomes were sufficiently similar in definition. MAIN RESULTS: There were 9 patients with collagenous colitis in the trial studying bismuth subsalicylate (nine 262 mg tablets daily for 8 weeks). Those randomized to active drug were more likely to have clinical (p = 0.003) and histological (p = 0.003) improvement than those assigned to placebo. Eleven patients were enrolled in the trial studying prednisolone (50 mg daily for 2 weeks). There was

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of the American Nutrition Association (2025) PMID: 39700461 ↗
A Standardized Boswellia serrata Extract Improves Knee Joint Function and Cartilage Morphology in Human Volunteers with Mild to Moderate Osteoarthritis in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of the American Nutrition Association; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: SN13108F supplementation is safe, and it mitigates joint pain and improves musculoskeletal function and cartilage morphology in KOA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Boswellia serrata Roxb. ex Colebr. (Family: Burseraceae; Genus: Boswellia) gum resin (Salai guggul) has profound therapeutic value in Ayurvedic and Unani medicines in alleviating several chronic inflammatory illnesses, including arthritis, asthma, skin and blood diseases, fever, etc. SN13108F (Aflapin®) is a proprietary, standardized Boswellia serrata gum resin extract. This 180-day randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study aimed to evaluate cartilage morphology using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), pain and joint function and long-term safety in the SN13108F-supplemented volunteers with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty adult male and female subjects with the Kellgren-Lawrence grade II - III KOA were supplemented with SN13108F (100 mg/day) or a matched placebo for 180 consecutive days. RESULTS: SN13108F reduced (p < 0.001; vs. baseline and placebo) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Visual Analogue Scale, Lequesne's Functional Index scores, improved six-minute walk test, and stair climb test. Post-trial MRI assessments of the tibiofemoral joints revealed that the cartilage volume, thickness, and joint space width were increased (p < 0.001; vs. placebo), and levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, matrix metalloproteinase-3, Fibulin-3, type II collagen degradation peptide in serum, and cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen in urine were significantly reduced (p < 0.001; vs. baseline and placebo) in the SN13108F-supplemented subjects. Hematology, complete serum biochemistry, urine analysis, and the participants' vital signs did not alter between the groups. CONCLUSION: SN13108F supplementation is safe, and it mitigates joint pain and improves musculoskeletal function and cartilage morphology in KOA.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of medicinal food (2024) PMID: 39446666 ↗
Investigating the Additive Effects of Loxacon(®) Food Supplement Capsules in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Crossover, Follow-Up, Three-Arm Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of medicinal food involving n = 88 participants. Key conclusion: The most pronounced difference was seen in the minimum clinically important difference index, calculated from the quality of life-VAS, where those taking Loxacon® capsules had a chance 3 times as high to obtain clinical improvement versus the other two groups.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Osteoarthritis is one of the most common locomotor diseases, with a steadily increasing prevalence and incidence. Loxacon® is a food supplement capsule containing vitamins, minerals, and herbal extracts with Boswellia serrata extract and Harpagophytum procumbens extract as its two main active components. The study involved 88 patients at 4 sites. The 88 patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group received physical therapy and Loxacon® capsules for 5 weeks, while the second group (30 patients) received physical therapy only for 5 weeks, and the third group (30 patients) received physical therapy and placebo capsules for 5 weeks. After 5 weeks, physical therapy was discontinued in all three groups and all groups continued Loxacon® capsules exclusively for an additional 60 days. Physical therapy had been carried out by a standard protocol over 5 weeks. Investigated parameters included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) testing, European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) quality of life test and the Range of Motion (ROM). Among the 4 visual analogue scale (VAS) values investigated from WOMAC, significant change was seen for functionality in all three groups; however, the extent of change was twice as large in the physical therapy + Loxacon® group at Visit 2 in comparison with the other two groups. In the physical therapy + placebo group, improvement was seen only at the 3rd visit when they were also receiving Loxacon® capsules. The most pronounced difference was seen in the minimum clinically important difference index, calculated from the quality of life-VAS, where those taking Loxacon® capsules had a chance 3 times as high to obtain clinical improvement versus the other two groups. Our study confirmed that a combination of boswellic acid and harpagosides is beneficial as an additional therapy in knee OA.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Terapevticheskii arkhiv (2023) PMID: 38785054 ↗
[Comparative efficacy of a combination of undenatured type II collagen, Boswellic acids, methylsulfonylmethane, vitamins C and D(3) and a combination of chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine hydrochloride in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee joint].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv involving n = 35 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The use of AN in patients with stage I-III primary knee OA was not inferior in efficacy to the combination of GC.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of Artneo (AN) in comparison with a combination of glucosamine hydrochloride and chondroitin sulfate (GC) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint (KJ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 70 patients with stages I-III of primary knee OA were randomized into 2 groups. Participants in the 1st (n=35) took AN 1 caps/day, in the 2nd (n=35) GC according to the standard regimen. After 7, 30, 90, 180 days, the Lequesne index (severity of OA), pain when moving according to VAS, WOMAC score were assessed, after 1, 3, 6 months - quality of life SF-36 and morning stiffness, after 6 months - MRI with T2 mapping, laboratory safety indicators. RESULTS: Over the course of 6 months of use, an improvement in the WOMAC index and a decrease in pain were observed without intergroup differences, and a greater decrease in stiffness in the AN group. After 3 months, the severity of OA decreased from moderate to mild in the AN group and was significantly lower compared to the GC group; quality of life (physical component of SF-36) was higher in the AN group. After 6 months, there was an improvement in cartilage ultrastructure (T2 relaxation time) in both groups and a more pronounced reduction of the synovitis area (MRI) in the AN group (2.95 and 1.37 times in the AN and GC group, respectively). There were no clinically significant adverse reactions observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: The use of AN in patients with stage I-III primary knee OA was not inferior in efficacy to the combination of GC. Further studies with greater statistical power (sample size) and follow-up period are warranted including in real clinical practice. Publisher: Цель. Оценить эффективность Артнео (АН) в сравнении с комбинацией глюкозамина гидрохлорида и хондроитина сульфата (ГХ) у больных остеоартритом (ОА) коленного сустава (КС). Материалы и методы. В исследовании 70 пациентов с I–III стадиями первичного ОА КС рандомизированы на 2 группы. В 1-й (n=35) группе участники принимали АН по 1 капсуле в сутки, во 2-й (n=35) – ГХ по стандартной схеме. Через 7, 30, 90, 180 дней оценивали индекс Лекена (тяжесть ОА), боль при движении по Визуальной аналоговой шкале, индекс WOMAC, через 1, 3

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37686880 ↗
Efficacy of Boswellia serrata Extract and/or an Omega-3-Based Product for Improving Pain and Function in People Older Than 40 Years with Persistent Knee Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 29 participants. Key conclusion: AvailOm® was safe and effective in reducing pain and improving the QoL and functionality of subjects over 40 years with persistent knee pain.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

A single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial with four arms was conducted in healthy subjects with persistent knee discomfort (pain intensity on 1-10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) > 3) aged 40 years and older treated with a dietary supplement for 8 weeks. The study groups were Boswellia serrata extract (n = 29), an omega-3-based product (AvailOm® 50 High EPA) (n = 31), Boswellia + AvailOm® (n = 30), and placebo (n = 30). The intake of Boswellia + AvailOm® improved the quality of life (QoL) (WOMAC index) and some variables of muscle strength. Statistically significant differences between the AvailOm® and the placebo groups in the decrease of pain intensity were found. Weekly VAS scores showed a significant decrease in pain perception when comparing the AvailOm® product to the placebo, with the lowest VAS scores at week 8. Consumption of Boswellia improved sleep latency. The time to perform the Up and Go test decreased after the intake of AvailOm®. There was an increase in the omega-3 fatty acids, with the greatest increase in the Boswellia + AvailOm® group. AvailOm® was safe and effective in reducing pain and improving the QoL and functionality of subjects over 40 years with persistent knee pain.

09
CLINICAL STUDY Nutrients (2022) PMID: 35565826 ↗
Positive Effects of a Lecithin-Based Delivery Form of Boswellia serrata Extract in Acute Diarrhea of Adult Subjects.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 49 participants. Key conclusion: CASP is safe and reduces the time it takes to become healthy, the frequency of stools, the abdominal pain and nausea of subjects with acute diarrhea.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Acute diarrhea is a frequent problem worldwide, mostly due to gastrointestinal infections or food poisoning. Boswellia serrata could be active in the treatment of acute diarrhea due to its anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, and antimicrobial activity. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, 49 adults with acute diarrhea were randomly allocated to receive 250 mg of a lecithin-based delivery form of Boswellia serrata (CASP) or placebo for 5 days. The time it took to become healthy with stoppage of diarrhea (primary end point) was significantly shorter in the intervention group (3.08 vs. 4.44 days: p-value < 0.0001). The probability of subjects treated with CASP to recover sooner was equal to 80.2%. A significantly lower number of stools was observed in the CASP group over time (β = −0.17, p-value < 0.0001). A significant difference was observed between the two groups for abdominal pain, nausea, and GAE (global assessment of efficacy). In conclusion, the lecithin-based delivery form of Boswellia serrata extract could be a useful addition to the treatment of acute diarrhea in adults. CASP is safe and reduces the time it takes to become healthy, the frequency of stools, the abdominal pain and nausea of subjects with acute diarrhea. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results.

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of the American Nutrition Association (2023) PMID: 35512759 ↗
Efficacy and Safety of Aflapin®, a Novel Boswellia Serrata Extract, in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Short-Term 30-Day Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of the American Nutrition Association involving n = 35 participants. Key conclusion: No significant adverse effects were observed.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Aflapin®, also known as AprèsFlex® was developed as an enhanced bioavailable extract of Boswellia serrata gum resin, standardized to 20% 3-O-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial confirms the efficacy of Aflapin in ameliorating the symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the American College of Rheumatology, seventy subjects were recruited and randomized into Placebo (n = 35) and Aflapin (n = 35) groups. Subjects received either 100 mg Aflapin or a placebo for 30 days. All subjects were evaluated for pain and physical function using the standard tools i.e., Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lequesne Functional Index (LFI), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at the baseline (Day 0), 5, and 30 days of treatment. Additionally, several inflammatory and cartilage biomarkers, including matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein (COMP), and collagen type II cleavage (C2C) were evaluated. Total blood chemistry analyses were conducted to affirm the safety of Aflapin. RESULTS: Sixty-seven subjects completed the study. Aflapin conferred significant improvements in pain scores as early as five days of treatment. Post-trial, VAS, LFI, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC function, and total WOMAC scores decreased in the Aflapin group by 45%, 40.9%, 44.4%, 66.3%, 44.4%, and 48%, respectively. Aflapin supplementation also reduced circulating MMP-3, TNFα, hsCRP, and C2C. CONCLUSION: This investigation affirms that Aflapin is clinically efficacious, fast-acting, and safe in the management of osteoarthritis. No significant adverse effects were observed.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category