NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Hyaluronic Acid (Joint)

JOINT BONE · Evidence Monograph

Hyaluronic Acid (Joint) is an evidence-graded joint bone monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (4 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 3,958 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 4 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 9 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 3,958
Trial Duration Range 6 months · 12 months · 3 months
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults aiming to address documented nutritional gaps or biomarker imbalances using standardized clinical formulations.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary joint bone clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (14 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (9 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (4 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Hyaluronic Acid (Joint) & Why Does Form Matter?

Hyaluronic Acid (Joint) is classified under JOINT BONE and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (see individual study protocols).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Hyaluronic Acid (Joint) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (9 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Hyaluronic Acid (Joint) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Hyaluronic Acid (Joint) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 4 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 3,958 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40169165 (2025) — "Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee." (Stem cell therapy is increasingly used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis, despite the lack of clarity around the mechanism by which stem cell therapy may slow down disease progression in osteoarthritis, and uncertainty regarding its benefits and harms.) • PMID:36856463 (2023) — "Efficacy and safety of arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid for meniscal injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies." (CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid for meniscal injury can improve the efficiency of treatment compared with arthroscopic surgery alone, as well as the efficacy in relieving joint pain and improving joint function and mobility, without increasing the i) • PMID:33507375 (2021) — "Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell injections for patients with osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis and review of RCTs." (CONCLUSION: There are significant therapeutic effects on joint function, symptoms, and no permanent adverse effect has been found after stem cell treatment.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 401691650.72 (1.1–1.53)PMID 419287431.17 (1.12–1.22)0.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Hyaluronic Acid (Joint), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Start at a conservative single-serving dose for the first 5–7 days to verify gastrointestinal tolerance.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2025) PMID: 40169165 ↗
Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 1,341 participants (RR 0.72). Key conclusion: Stem cell therapy is increasingly used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis, despite the lack of clarity around the mechanism by which stem cell therapy may slow down disease progression in osteoarthritis, and uncertainty regarding its benefits and harms.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Stem cells are specialised precursor cells that can replace aged or damaged cells and thereby maintain healthy tissue function. Stem cell therapy is increasingly used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis, despite the lack of clarity around the mechanism by which stem cell therapy may slow down disease progression in osteoarthritis, and uncertainty regarding its benefits and harms. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of stem cell injections for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. A secondary objective is to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase on 15 September 2023, unrestricted by date or language of publication. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant trial protocols and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or trials using quasi-randomised methods of participant allocation, comparing stem cell injection with placebo injection, no treatment or usual care, glucocorticoid injection, other injections, exercise, drug therapy, surgical interventions, and supplements and complementary therapies in people with knee osteoarthritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected studies for inclusion, extracted trial characteristics and outcome data, assessed risk of bias and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. The primary comparison was stem cell injection compared with placebo injection. The primary time point for pain, function and quality of life was three to six months, and the end of the trial period for participant-reported success, joint structure changes and adverse event outcomes. Major outcomes were pain, function, quality of life, global assessment of success, radiographic joint progression, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: We found 25 randomised trials (1341 participants) comparing stem cell injections with placebo injection (eight trials), no treatment or usual care (analgesia, we

02
META-ANALYSIS Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) (2023) PMID: 36856463 ↗
Efficacy and safety of arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid for meniscal injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) involving n = 955 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0 (OR 3.44). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid for meniscal injury can improve the efficiency of treatment compared with arthroscopic surgery alone, as well as the efficacy in relieving joint pain and improving joint function and mobility, without increasing the i
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid in the treatment of meniscal injuries were evaluated by Meta-analysis to provide an evidence-based basis for the selection of clinical treatment options. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science English databases, and Chinese databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WAN FANG, VIP, and China SinoMed had been searched up to June 2021. Quality evaluation was performed concerning the Cochrane Systematic Evaluation Tool. The obtained data were analyzed using the statistical software Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials with a total of 955 patients were eventually included, 473 in the arthroscopic combined with hyaluronic acid group (combined treatment group) and 482 in the arthroscopy alone group (surgery group). The results of the study revealed that the excellent treatment [OR = 3.44, 95% CI (2.10, 5.65), p < .00,001], the VAS score [MD = -0.99, 95% CI (-1.50, -0.48), p = .0002], the Lysholm score [MD = 9.70, 95% CI (6.41, 12.99), p < .00,001] and the joint mobility [MD = 6.31, 95% CI (0.84, 11.78), p = .02] of the combined treatment group were significantly better than the surgery group, the difference was statistically significant. The complications rate was comparable in both groups [OR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.29, 2.53), p = .78], with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid for meniscal injury can improve the efficiency of treatment compared with arthroscopic surgery alone, as well as the efficacy in relieving joint pain and improving joint function and mobility, without increasing the incidence of complications. Arthroscopic surgery combined with hyaluronic acid administration has good effectiveness and safety profile. Therefore, hyaluronic acid supplementation is recommended after arthroscopic surgery when treating meniscal injuries.

03
META-ANALYSIS Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (2021) PMID: 33507375 ↗
Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell injections for patients with osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis and review of RCTs.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: There are significant therapeutic effects on joint function, symptoms, and no permanent adverse effect has been found after stem cell treatment.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA), which has a high incidence in the elderly, brings a huge economic burden to society. MSCs (Mesenchymal Stem Cells) have shown great multidirectional differentiation potential which are expected to treat OA, and numerous clinical trials have been conducted. However, the efficacy and safety of the MSCs still need to be further integrated and analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and ScienceDirect) for assessing eligible trials that randomized controlled trials, hyaluronic acid as control, and MSCs injection to treat OA. Vitro studies and animal studies were excluded. Search terms were: "cartilage," "clinical trial," "mesenchymal," "stromal" and "stem cell", "osteoarthritis". The preliminary guidelines and study protocol were published online at PROSPERO. RESULTS: Many assessment scales could not be improved significantly after 6 months. However, most of the scales were significantly improved after 12 months, indicating that compared with hyaluronic acid, stem cells could relieve OA symptoms significantly. No serious adverse effect was found. CONCLUSION: There are significant therapeutic effects on joint function, symptoms, and no permanent adverse effect has been found after stem cell treatment. It is promising to apply intro-articular injection of stem cells for OA to clinical application. More researches are needed to supplement present deficiencies.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Harefuah (2017) PMID: 28786278 ↗
[NON-ARTHROPLASTY TREATMENT FOR KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Meta-Analysis published in Harefuah. Key conclusion: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication (NSAIDS) and opiate treatment have limited long term effect on reducing pain, disability and improving quality of life.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Osteoarthritis is characterized by marked pain, stiffness and reduced range of motion and is one of the most common causes of disability and reduced quality of life. The disease is diagnosed in 20% of the adult population; the prevalence rises to 50% of adults over 65 years of age. There are various treatment options in the early stages of knee osteoarthritis which are intended to postpone the need for arthroplasty, which is the gold standard treatment at the end-stage level of the disease. Evidence based medicine (EBM) facilitates optimized decision-making and treatment for an individual patient based on meta-analysis, randomize control studies and systematic reviews. Based on these studies, physical activity is an effective treatment option resulting in reduced disability and improved quality of life. Among other conservative treatment options, chondroitin, a food supplement, was found to be as effective as anti-inflammatory medication with a lower side effect profile. Similar results were found for intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid, while intra-articular injections of platelet rich plasma (PRP) were found to be the most effective of all the above. No advantage was reported for knee arthroscopy over conservative treatment options even when examining those patients with combined symptomatic meniscal tear and knee osteoarthritis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication (NSAIDS) and opiate treatment have limited long term effect on reducing pain, disability and improving quality of life. These drugs can have a high rate of substantial side effect. Hence, their use should be limited, especially in the elderly population, and safer modalities should be explored.

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Medical journal of Malaysia (2026) PMID: 41914582 ↗
Cytopeutics umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells are associated with earlier clinical improvement compared to bone marrow aspirate concentrate with scaffold in knee cartilage injury: A Phase 1 feasibility and Phase 2 randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Medical journal of Malaysia involving n = 28 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: In PI, KOOS scores improved significantly from 3 months, reaching 85.83 ± 11.87 at 12 months (p
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in the development of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), the ultimate benefits of MSCs against current cell-based therapies are still limited. This study aimed to assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of Cytopeutics® umbilical cord-derived MSCs (Chondrocell-EX) in patients with knee cartilage injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in two parts: a phase I feasibility study (PI) followed by a phase II randomized controlled trial (PII). Both studies were approved by UKM Research Ethics Committee (PI: UKM PPI/111/8; PII: UKM PPI/111/8/JEP-2019-304). Six patients were involved in the PI study in which all patients received Chondrocell-EX and 28 patients in the following PII study, where 17 patients received Chondrocell-EX with Hyaluronic acid (HA) (Arm A) and 11 patients received commercially available cell-based therapy, which is Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) with Hyaluronic acid-based scaffold (HA-S) (Arm B). Safety was assessed based on the occurrence of adverse events, while clinical outcomes were assessed based on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Second-look arthroscopy and histological assessment were performed to assess their structural outcomes at 12 months. RESULTS: In the PI feasibility study, significant pain reduction began at 3 months, with mean VAS decreasing from 6.83 ± 0.98 at baseline to 4.83 ± 1.17 (p < 0.01), 3.00 ± 0.00 at 6 months (p < 0.01), and 1.83 ± 0.75 at 12 months (p < 0.01). In the PII study, Arm A (Chondrocell-EX + HA) demonstrated significant VAS improvements at all follow-up points compared to baseline (p < 0.001), whereas Arm B (BMAC + HA-S) showed significant reductions only from 3 months onward. After adjustment for baseline age and VAS, Arm A achieved significantly lower pain scores than Arm B at 6 months (2.56 ± 1.41 vs 3.09 ± 1.22; p = 0.015) and 12 months (2.27 ± 1.49 vs 2.50 ± 1.35; p = 0.043), indicating earlier and sustained pain relief with Chondrocell-EX injection. Functional outcomes mirrored pain improvements. In PI, KOOS scores improved significantly from 3 months, reaching 85.83 ± 11.87 at 12 months (p

06
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of extracellular vesicles (2026) PMID: 41619174 ↗
Circulating Metabolites Treat Human TMJ-OA by Eliminating Senescent Chondrocytes via the C1QBP/C1q/p14ARF Axis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of extracellular vesicles. Key conclusion: In contrast, C-EVs were significantly enriched with functional proteins C1q binding protein (C1QBP).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) is a progressive degenerative disorder, for which therapeutic interventions remain limited. The disruption of metabolic homeostasis plays a critical role in the pathogenesis and advancement of TMJ-OA. However, it remains unclear whether extracellular vesicles (EVs) as cellular metabolites are correlated with the pathogenesis, treatment and diagnosis of TMJ-OA. In this study, we demonstrated that autologous circulating extracellular vesicles (C-EVs) possessed significant therapeutic potential for TMJ-OA through the targeted removal of senescent chondrocytes. In a randomized clinical trial (ChiCTR2200063153), C-EV administration was found to significantly enhance condylar bone regeneration and alleviate symptoms relative to hyaluronic acid controls, without eliciting any adverse effects. Comparative analysis revealed that joint cavity-derived EVs from TMJ-OA patients (OA-EVs) exhibited structural abnormalities, diminished expression of canonical EV markers, and pro-inflammatory characteristics. In contrast, C-EVs were significantly enriched with functional proteins C1q binding protein (C1QBP). And the level of C1QBP-positive EVs was positively correlated with therapeutic outcomes, thereby establishing C1QBP as a potential predictive biomarker for TMJ-OA. Furthermore, C-EVs reestablished joint homeostasis by regulating the immune microenvironment and tissue regeneration capacity. Mechanistically, C1QBPhigh C-EVs upregulated the expression of membrane C1q on senescent chondrocytes, thereby initiating C1q-C1QBP binding, p14ARF translocation to mitochondria, and subsequent cytochrome C/caspase-3-dependent apoptosis. Our findings demonstrate that C-EVs serve a dual therapeutic role by facilitating the clearance of senescent cells via the C1QBP/C1q/p14ARF axis, while promoting tissue regeneration and regulating metabolites homeostasis, offering a novel biological strategy for TMJ-OA treatment. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of Extracellular Vesicles published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Oral and maxillofacial surgery (2026) PMID: 41514013 ↗
Platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid injection following arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint disorders under sedation: a comparative clinical study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Oral and maxillofacial surgery; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: TMJ arthrocentesis alone provides substantial pain relief and functional gains.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are a common source of orofacial pain and dysfunction. Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a minimally invasive treatment that can be augmented with intra-articular injections. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) injections following TMJ arthrocentesis in patients with TMDs unresponsive to conservative therapy. METHODS: Sixty patients (72 joints) were randomized into three equal groups. Group A underwent arthrocentesis with Ringer's lactate (RL) alone (control), Group B received PRP injection post-arthrocentesis, and Group C received HA injection post-arthrocentesis. Pain intensity (VAS), maximum mouth opening (MMO), and TMJ sounds were evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. Repeated-measures ANOVA and chi-square tests were used for analysis (p < 0.05). RESULTS: All groups showed significant improvements in pain and MMO over time. Mean VAS pain scores decreased from ~ 4.8 to < 1.0 at 24 weeks (p < 0.001), while MMO increased from ~ 32 mm to ~ 40 mm (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the PRP and HA groups in pain or function at any follow-up point, nor between either treatment group and the control group. TMJ clicking resolved or improved in > 95% of joints across all groups. No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: TMJ arthrocentesis alone provides substantial pain relief and functional gains. PRP and HA did not confer additional benefit over lavage alone within the 6-month timeframe. Further studies are required to assess any potential long-term differences. © 2026. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Knee (2026) PMID: 41385821 ↗
Efficacy and safety of a single intra-articular injection of mannitol-combined hyaluronan in patients with knee osteoarthritis - A double-blinded randomized clinical study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Knee involving n = 132 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: A single injection of JETKNEE did not show superiority to placebo in the primary outcome (VAS pain), but demonstrated improvements in secondary functional outcomes for 6 months in patients with knee OA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) include injections such as hyaluronic acid (HA), which stabilizes joints but degrades quickly due to reactive oxygen species. The experimental product JETKNEE combines non-crosslinked HA (20 mg/ml) with 0.5 % mannitol, that may slow HA degradation and extend its effect, but with a limited clinical evidence base. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intra-articular injection of JETKNEE versus saline in patients with symptomatic knee OA. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized trial, 132 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 OA received 2 ml of either JETKNEE or saline. The primary outcome was change in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne index, ultrasound evaluation of cartilage thickness, quadriceps muscle thickness, OA cartilage grading, and adverse events. RESULTS: VAS pain improved significantly in both groups without between-group difference. JETKNEE showed significantly greater improvement in WOMAC pain, function, and total scores across all time points (P < 0.05). Lequesne index improved more rapidly at early visits. No significant differences were observed in ultrasound findings or patient satisfaction. Adverse events were more frequent in the JETKNEE group but were mostly mild. CONCLUSION: A single injection of JETKNEE did not show superiority to placebo in the primary outcome (VAS pain), but demonstrated improvements in secondary functional outcomes for 6 months in patients with knee OA.

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of ISAKOS (2026) PMID: 41248880 ↗
Efficacy of single intra-articular 2% sodium hyaluronate versus corticosteroid injection in isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of ISAKOS involving n = 60 participants. Key conclusion: Intra-articular HA may be an alternative to CS, with equivalent results but without increasing the risk of chondrotoxicity and cartilage volume loss, especially in isolated PFOA patients whose tibiofemoral compartment cartilage is relatively pres
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) is unicompartmental arthritis with a hallmark of anterior knee pain, disturbing quality of life. Unlike tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, there is still a lack of evidence regarding intra-articular injection for isolated PFOA patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) in comparison to corticosteroid (CS) injections for pain reduction and improvement in knee function in isolated PFOA patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients with isolated PFOA based on clinical and radiographic features were randomized 1:1 to receive a single-shot, 2 ​ml intra-articular 2% sodium hyaluronate plus 0.5% mannitol or a 2 ​ml solution comprising 1 ​ml of 40 ​mg triamcinolone acetonide and 1% lidocaine. The visual analog scale (VAS) for anterior knee pain, Kujala score, pain during injection, and adverse events were assessed during a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in VAS pain and Kujala scores from 48 ​h post-injection to 6 months compared to baseline (p ​< ​0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, there were no significant between-group differences in VAS pain (mean difference [95% CI]: -4.46 [-11.2, 2.28]; p ​= ​0.270) or Kujala scores (2.56 [-4.08, 9.2]; p ​= ​0.45). However, at 48 ​h, 72 ​h, and 1 week post-injection, the CS group reported statistically significantly greater pain relief compared to the HA group (mean differences: 10.33, 9.67, and 7.67; p ​= ​0.002, 0.003, and 0.013, respectively). No significant differences were observed in pain during injection or adverse events. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular HA and CS injections provide comparable pain reduction and functional score improvement at 6-month follow-up in patients with PFOA, with better pain relief in the first week for the CS group. Intra-articular HA may be an alternative to CS, with equivalent results but without increasing the risk of chondrotoxicity and cartilage volume loss, especially in isolated PFOA patients whose tibiofemoral compartment cartilage is relatively pres

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) International journal of molecular sciences (2025) PMID: 40943401 ↗
Cartilage Regeneration Potential in Early Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Prospective, Randomized, Open, and Blinded Endpoint Study Comparing Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell (ADSC) Therapy Versus Hyaluronic Acid.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International journal of molecular sciences. Key conclusion: In conclusion, intra-articular ADSC injections show superior cartilage restoration on MRI and better clinical outcomes than HA injection, making them a promising treatment for early-stage knee OA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Early-stage knee osteoarthritis (knee OA) lacks effective regenerative therapies. This study aimed to compare the cartilage regenerative effects, clinical efficacy, and safety of intra-articular injections of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) versus hyaluronic acid (HA). Forty-eight patients with early knee OA were enrolled in a prospective open-blinded multi-center study at Suranaree University of Technology Hospital and Phramongkutklao Hospital. Participants were randomized into either the ADSC or HA group. Primary outcomes included MRI-based cartilage lesion volume, synovial thickness via ultrasound, and WOMAC scores over 6 months. MRI results revealed significant and progressive cartilage regeneration in the ADSC group. In particular, medial femoral cartilage lesion volume decreased by 50.06 mm3, whereas the HA group showed an increase of 36.44 mm3. Synovial thickness also declined significantly in the ADSC group at 3 and 6 months. Both groups demonstrated reduced symptoms, but the ADSC group achieved superior and sustained improvements in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function scores throughout the 6-month follow-up. The clinical benefits were consistent and more pronounced compared with HA. No serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, intra-articular ADSC injections show superior cartilage restoration on MRI and better clinical outcomes than HA injection, making them a promising treatment for early-stage knee OA.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category