NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Chondroitin Sulfate

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Chondroitin Sulfate is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (5 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 1,075 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 5 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 1,075
Reported Trial Dosages 1200mg/day · 1000mg/day · 300 mg
Trial Duration Range 90 days · 3 months · 12 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1200mg/day · 1000mg/day · 300 mg) over a structured 90 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
joint (PubMed clinical endpoint)
pain (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Chondroitin Sulfate & Why Does Form Matter?

Chondroitin Sulfate is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1200mg/day, 1000mg/day, 300 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Chondroitin Sulfate frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Chondroitin Sulfate acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Chondroitin Sulfate an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 5 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 1,075 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:30879253 (2019) — "Efficacy of Chondroitin Sulfate in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Exploring Inconsistencies in Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials." (CONCLUSION: This new meta-analysis suggests that CS provides a moderate benefit for pain and has a large effect on function in knee OA, however with large inconsistency.) • PMID:30859538 (2019) — "Effects of Oral Chondroitin Sulfate on Osteoarthritis-Related Pain and Joint Structural Changes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (These data suggest that CS has small to moderate effectiveness in reducing OA-related pain but minimal effects on joint space narrowing and no effect on cartilage volume.) • PMID:29947998 (2018) — "Effect of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials." (Oral supplementation with glucosamine or chondroitin sulfate reduces pain in knee OA.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 30859538-0.41PMID 400054470.22 (0.03–0.42)-0.53Null (0)0.54Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1200mg/day · 1000mg/day · 300 mg · 100g over 90 days · 3 months · 12 weeks · 5 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Chondroitin Sulfate, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1200mg/day · 1000mg/day · 300 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 90 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Advances in therapy (2019) PMID: 30879253 ↗
Efficacy of Chondroitin Sulfate in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Exploring Inconsistencies in Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in therapy; statistical significance reported at p = 0.07. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: This new meta-analysis suggests that CS provides a moderate benefit for pain and has a large effect on function in knee OA, however with large inconsistency.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: There are some controversies about treatment modalities in osteoarthritis (OA), including chondroitin sulfate (CS). The objective of this study was to determine whether CS is effective at alleviating pain and improving function in patients with knee OA and to identify the factors that explain inconsistencies in clinical trial results. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials, searching the databases Medline, Cochrane central register for controlled trials and Scopus. Random effects meta-analysis was then performed, using tau2 and I2 statistics to assess heterogeneity. The pain and Lequesne index (LI) scores were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was explored by stratifying the analyses according to pre-specified study-level characteristics and assessing the sources of funnel plot asymmetry. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria yielded 18 trials. Overall, CS significantly but inconsistently reduced pain (SMD: - 0.63; 95% CI: - 0.91, - 0.35; I2 = 94%) and improved function (SMD: - 0.82; 95% CI: - 1.31, - 0.33; I2 = 95%). When limiting the analysis to studies with a low risk of bias, the pharmaceutical grade CS of IBSA origin showed a greater reduction in pain (SMD: - 0.25; 95% CI: - 0.34, - 0.16; I2 = 75%) and function (SMD: - 0.33; 95% CI: - 0.47, - 0.20; I2 = 53%, p = 0.07) compared with the other preparations (SMDPain: - 0.08; 95% CI: - 0.19, + 0.02; I2 = 20%; SMDFunction: - 0.18; 95% CI: - 0.36, +0.01; I2 = 0%). Assessing funnel plot asymmetry in the studies with a low risk of bias, we found strong correlations between the treatment effects and study size (pain: rS = 0.93; LI: rS = 0.86; p < 0.05). Ultimately, there was no residual heterogeneity in the CS effects when the smallest studies were removed from the analyses. CONCLUSION: This new meta-analysis suggests that CS provides a moderate benefit for pain and has a large effect on function in knee OA, however with large inconsistency. The risks of bias, brand and study size were the factors explaining heterogeneity among the clinical trial results.

02
META-ANALYSIS Journal of special operations medicine (2019) PMID: 30859538 ↗
Effects of Oral Chondroitin Sulfate on Osteoarthritis-Related Pain and Joint Structural Changes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of special operations medicine (SMD -0.41). Key conclusion: These data suggest that CS has small to moderate effectiveness in reducing OA-related pain but minimal effects on joint space narrowing and no effect on cartilage volume.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

105. J Spec Oper Med. 2019 Spring;19(1):113-124. doi: 10.55460/JLSS-PG9B. Effects of Oral Chondroitin Sulfate on Osteoarthritis-Related Pain and Joint Structural Changes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Knapik JJ, Pope R, Hoedebecke SS, Schram B, Orr R. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disorder involving the deterioration of articular cartilage and underlying bone and is associated with symptoms of pain and disability. In military personnel, the incidence of OA has increased between 2000 and 2012 and was the first or second leading cause of medical separations in this period. It has been suggested that consumption of chondroitin sulfate (CS) may reduce the pain and joint deterioration associated with OA. This article reports on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of CS on reducing OA-related pain and joint deterioration. PubMed and Ovid Embase databases and other sources were searched to find randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on the effects of orally consumed CS on pain and/or joint structure. The outcome measure was the standardized mean difference (SMD) which was the improvement in the placebo groups minus the improvement in the CS groups divided by the pooled standard deviation. There were 18 trials meeting the review criteria for pain with SMD -0.41, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.57 to -0.25 (negative SMD favors CS). Six studies met the review criteria for joint space narrowing with SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.61 to +0.00. Two studies meet the review criteria for cartilage volume with SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.48 to +0.26. Larger dosages (1200mg/d) had greater pain reduction efficacy than lower dosages (≤ 1000mg/d). These data suggest that CS has small to moderate effectiveness in reducing OA-related pain but minimal effects on joint space narrowing and no effect on cartilage volume. It is important that clinicians recommend pharmaceutical-grade CS to their patients due to the variability in the amount of CS in dietary supplements purporting to contain CS. 2019.

03
META-ANALYSIS Rheumatology international (2018) PMID: 29947998 ↗
Effect of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in Rheumatology international; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04. Key conclusion: Oral supplementation with glucosamine or chondroitin sulfate reduces pain in knee OA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Although glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate have showed beneficial effects on joint tissues in osteoarthritis (OA), their therapeutic use in the clinical setting is still debatable. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials was conducted to investigate the efficacy of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate on knee OA symptoms. Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effect of orally administered glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate on OA symptoms using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and/or the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and generic inverse-variance method. Heterogeneity was tested using the I2 statistic index. Treatments with glucosamine and chondroitin were found to significantly reduce pain in VAS [weighted mean difference (WMD) - 7.41 mm, 95% CI - 14.31, - 0.51, p = 0.04 and WMD - 8.35 mm, 95% CI - 11.84, - 4.85, p < 0.00001, respectively]. Their combination did not show this behavior (WMD - 0.28 mm, 95% CI - 8.87, 8.32, p = 0.95). None of the glucosamine, chondroitin or their combination had a significant positive effect on the total WOMAC index and its subscores. Oral supplementation with glucosamine or chondroitin sulfate reduces pain in knee OA. However, there is no additional effect using both therapeutic agents in combination for the management of symptomatic knee OA.

04
CLINICAL STUDY The Physician and sportsmedicine (2010) PMID: 20631466 ↗
A potential role for avocado- and soybean-based nutritional supplements in the management of osteoarthritis: a review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2010 Meta-Analysis published in The Physician and sportsmedicine. Key conclusion: Because of the lack or perceived lack of response to many conventional therapies for OA as well as concerns regarding the long-term administration of drugs (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), oral joint health supplements (OJHSs) have become increasingly popular among pat
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Erratum in Phys Sportsmed. 2010 Oct;38(3):128. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common, painful, and debilitating condition that affects approximately 46.4 million individuals in the United States. By 2012, this number is expected to increase to 60 million. In addition, it is the leading cause of activity limitation in adults and represents a widely acknowledged economic burden. Although the ultimate goal is to slow or prevent OA progression, at present, medical management of OA is aimed primarily at controlling symptoms of pain and stiffness and maintaining joint mobility and quality of life. Because of the lack or perceived lack of response to many conventional therapies for OA as well as concerns regarding the long-term administration of drugs (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), oral joint health supplements (OJHSs) have become increasingly popular among patients with OA. This article briefly reviews pertinent molecular mechanisms involved in the development of OA and summarizes available in vitro and in vivo evidence supporting the use of avocado and soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) either alone or in combination with glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate in patients with OA. Basic scientific research studies and a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available high-quality randomized clinical trials indicate that 300 mg of ASU per day (with or without glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate) appears to be beneficial for patients with hip or knee OA. There is also some evidence that ASU or ASU/glucosamine/chondroitin sulfate combination products could be used prophylactically in even the earliest stages of OA. Considering concerns regarding inferior-quality OJHSs, consumers and physicians are encouraged to take an evidence-based approach when evaluating OJHSs to identify and recommend safe and effective products that meet label claims when tested independently, and are of the highest quality.

05
META-ANALYSIS Archives of internal medicine (2003) PMID: 12860572 ↗
Structural and symptomatic efficacy of glucosamine and chondroitin in knee osteoarthritis: a comprehensive meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2003 Meta-Analysis published in Archives of internal medicine. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the structural efficacy of glucosamine and indistinguishable symptomatic efficacies for both compounds.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To assess the structural and symptomatic efficacy of oral glucosamine sulfate and chondroitin sulfate in knee osteoarthritis through independent meta-analyses of their effects on joint space narrowing, Lequesne Index, Western Ontario MacMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale for pain, mobility, safety, and response to treatment. METHODS: An exhaustive systematic research of randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials published or performed between January 1980 and March 2002 that assessed the efficacy of oral glucosamine or chondroitin on gonarthrosis was performed using MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Current Contents, BIOSIS Previews, HealthSTAR, EBM Reviews, manual review of the literature and congressional abstracts, and direct contact with the authors and manufacturers of glucosamine and chondroitin. Inclusion, quality scoring, and data abstraction were performed systematically by 2 independent reviewers who were blinded to sources and authors. Conservative approaches were used for clear assessment of potential efficacy. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated a highly significant efficacy of glucosamine on all outcomes, including joint space narrowing and WOMAC. Chondroitin was found to be effective on Lequesne Index, visual analog scale pain, mobility, and responding status. Safety was excellent for both compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the structural efficacy of glucosamine and indistinguishable symptomatic efficacies for both compounds. Regarding the relatively sparse data on glucosamine and joint space narrowing and the absence of data on structural effects of chondroitin, further studies are needed to investigate the relationship among time, dose, patient baseline characteristics, and structural efficacy for an accurate, disease-modifying characterization of these 2 compounds.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition (2026) PMID: 41895826 ↗
Effect of whole grain pancakes on postprandial cardiometabolic risk factors in healthy subjects: A randomized crossover trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important dietary guidance for both pancake consumers and individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Whole grains are rich in nutrients and have multiple health benefits, playing an important role in the diet. This study aims to investigate the acute effects of different whole grain pancakes on cardiometabolic risk factors in healthy subjects. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Twenty eligible healthy sub-jects (aged 19-24 years) were recruited, with baseline measurements including fasting blood glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein (CRP), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Then, the subjects were randomly allocated into four groups: the steamed bun (SB) group (control group), maize pancake (MP) group, buckwheat pancake (BP) group, and oat pancake (OP) group, with a serving size of 100g. Blood samples were collected at 0h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, and 3h, respectively. After a one-week washout period, the volunteers consumed another type of pancake in a crossover manner until each volunteer had tried all four foods. Serum cardiometabolic risk factors were analyzed using standard methods. RESULTS: No significant differences in serum glucose, insulin, CRP, TG, and HDL-C concentrations were observed among the control group and three whole grain pancake groups. However, compared with the control group, the concentrations of serum TC and LDL-C in the oat pancake group were significantly reduced (p <0.05), which may be attributed to the presence of β-glucan and higher dietary fiber in oat pancakes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important dietary guidance for both pancake consumers and individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors.

07
CLINICAL STUDY The Journal of clinical investigation (2026) PMID: 41632536 ↗
Plasma chondroitin sulfate predicts the effectiveness of fluid resuscitation strategies in patients with sepsis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Clinical Study published in The Journal of clinical investigation involving n = 574 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.022. Key conclusion: As baseline chondroitin sulfate increased, subsequent randomization to a restrictive strategy was increasingly beneficial (P = 0.022): treatment effect hazard ratio (restrictive versus liberal) for mortality was estimated as 1.49 (95% CI, 0.98-2.27), 1.30 (95% CI, 1.00-1.69), 1.0
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUNDPlasma heparan sulfate, a glycosaminoglycan released during endothelial glycocalyx degradation, predicts sepsis mortality. Chondroitin sulfate is a circulating glycosaminoglycan not specific to glycocalyx degradation; its relevance to sepsis is unknown.METHODSWe studied the associations of plasma chondroitin sulfate with (a) mortality in patients with sepsis-associated hypotension and (b) the relative effectiveness of a randomly assigned liberal versus restrictive intravenous fluid resuscitation strategy. We selected 574 patients enrolled in the Crystalloid Liberal or Vasopressors Early Resuscitation in Sepsis trial using an outcome-enriched sampling strategy. We used liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to quantify plasma chondroitin sulfate. In comparison, we measured hyaluronic acid as a glycocalyx degradation marker and IL-6 as an inflammatory biomarker. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to examine associations of baseline biomarker concentrations with mortality and resuscitation strategy effectiveness. We used inverse probability of selection weights and generalized raking to account for the nonrepresentative sampling design.RESULTSPlasma chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid, and IL-6 were associated with mortality within 90 days. As baseline chondroitin sulfate increased, subsequent randomization to a restrictive strategy was increasingly beneficial (P = 0.022): treatment effect hazard ratio (restrictive versus liberal) for mortality was estimated as 1.49 (95% CI, 0.98-2.27), 1.30 (95% CI, 1.00-1.69), 1.09 (95% CI, 0.82-1.44), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.66-1.16), and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.52-0.97) for 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of baseline chondroitin sulfate.CONCLUSIONPlasma chondroitin sulfate predicts sepsis mortality and may modify the response to a subsequent liberal versus restrictive intravenous fluid resuscitation strategy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03434028.FUNDINGNIH grants R01HL149422 and R01HL094786.

08
CLINICAL STUDY mSystems (2025) PMID: 41313018 ↗
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Probio-M8 enhances chondroitin efficacy for knee osteoarthritis in postmenopausal women via the gut-joint axis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in mSystems involving n = 37 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the co-administration of Probio-M8 with chondroitin sulfate significantly alleviates KOA symptoms.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic joint disease marked by cartilage degradation and inflammation. Probiotics exhibit anti-inflammatory properties and may influence the gut-joint axis. Thus, a 4-month human trial was conducted to assess the adjunctive effects of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Probio-M8 on KOA in postmenopausal women. Sixty-five KOA patients were randomly allocated to the probiotic group (n = 37; Probio-M8 and chondroitin sulfate) or placebo group (n = 28; placebo and chondroitin sulfate). Following a 3-month intervention, participants from both groups entered a 1-month observation without probiotic supplementation. Our findings revealed that Probio-M8 co-administration significantly reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at months 1, 3, and 4 compared to the placebo group (P < 0.001). The probiotic group showed a significant decrease in serum IFN-γ and increases in IL-4 and IL-10 (P < 0.05). Fecal metagenome analysis showed significant changes in the gut microbiota of the probiotic group, with increases in potentially beneficial species, including Agathobaculum butyriciproducens, Bacteroides stercoris, B. animalis, Roseburia hominis, and Ruminococcus bromii, while Dorea formicigenerans decreased (P < 0.05). Changes in B. animalis were strongly associated with WOMAC scores. The gut metabolic potential analysis showed elevated levels of N-oleoylethanolamine and decreased levels of cholesterol and hypoxanthine in probiotic receivers (P < 0.05). Metabolite analysis revealed post-interventional alternations in fecal prostaglandin E2, stearic acid, cholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid, xanthine, testosterone, and serum bile acids (P < 0.05). Collectively, Probio-M8 enhances the effectiveness of chondroitin sulfate in KOA management through modulating the gut-joint axis, potentially via regulating multiple inflammatory pathways. IMPORTANCE: The pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and its phenotypic expression have been associated with the human gut microbiota. Our study demonstrated that the co-administration of Probio-M8 with chondroitin sulfate significantly alleviates KOA symptoms. This

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of cataract and refractive surgery (2026) PMID: 41283760 ↗
Randomized comparative multicenter study assessing two dispersive viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of cataract and refractive surgery involving n = 242 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This investigation proved the noninferiority of Z-HYALCOAT to HEALON EndoCoat in IOP spikes and showed the 2 devices to be highly similar in all evaluated aspects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: To compare 2 dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs), Z-HYALCOAT (investigational) and HEALON EndoCoat (control), with a 3-month postoperative follow-up. SETTING: Multicenter study conducted in 11 sites across Europe. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, masked, multicenter postmarket study. METHODS: Adult participants having clear intraocular media excluding the presence of cataract and scheduled for uneventful age-related cataract removal by phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in the capsular bag with sole administration of either investigational or control device as per randomization scheme were included in this study. Primary endpoint was the incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥30 mm Hg. Other endpoints included slitlamp observations, corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), surgeon-reported device functionality, and rate of adverse events and device deficiencies. RESULTS: 242 participants were treated in this study (123 with the investigational OVD and 119 with the control OVD). In per-protocol population, 13 eyes (11.2%) from the investigational group and 19 (17.0%) from the control group reached an IOP equal to or higher than 30 mm Hg at 8 hours after device use. Slitlamp examinations performed up to 3 months did not reveal any relevant differences between the groups. ECD loss was also similar between the groups. Surgeon-reported OVD functionality was generally favorable and comparable for both devices. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation proved the noninferiority of Z-HYALCOAT to HEALON EndoCoat in IOP spikes and showed the 2 devices to be highly similar in all evaluated aspects.

10
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of cosmetic dermatology (2025) PMID: 40952030 ↗
Efficacy of Encorelane in Enhancing Barrier Function and Reducing Aging Signs in Sensitive Skin.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of cosmetic dermatology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Encorelane effectively targets both inflammation and aging signs, supporting its use as a dermocosmetic solution for sensitive, aging-prone skin.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Sensitive skin requires targeted care to improve barrier function, reduce inflammation, and manage neurovascular reactivity. OBJECTIVE: Encorelane, a novel ingredient blend of saccharide isomerate, ribose, and fructooligosaccharides, was evaluated for its efficacy in addressing sensitive skin and visible aging signs. METHODS: In vitro: A 3D epidermal model (EpiKutis) with Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) induction was used to assess cytokines (interleukin 1α [IL-1α], interleukin 6 [IL-6], interleukin 8 [IL-8], tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α], prostaglandin E2 [PGE2]) and barrier markers (filaggrin [FLG], loricrin [LOR], transglutaminase 1 [TGM1]). Hydration was examined via aquaporin 3 (AQP3) expression levels. Anti-wrinkle efficacy was tested against UVA/UVB exposure, evaluating collagen synthesis and skin matrix components (Collagen types I, III, IV, VII, XVII, Laminin 5, hyaluronic acid [HA], Chondroitin sulfate [CS]). In vivo: A 6-week double-blind, half-face study in 23 sensitive-skin subjects evaluated the clinical effects of Encorelane versus placebo on repair, redness, firmness, and wrinkles. RESULTS: In vitro: Compared to the control group, Encorelane significantly reduced the levels of IL-1α, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and PGE2 (p < 0.05), and significantly increased the levels of AQP3, FLG, LOR, TGM1, collagen types I, III, IV, VII, XVII, and laminin 5 (p < 0.05). In vivo: Compared to the placebo, Encorelane significantly improved TEWL, R2, F4, and crow's feet wrinkles (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Encorelane effectively targets both inflammation and aging signs, supporting its use as a dermocosmetic solution for sensitive, aging-prone skin. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category