NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Collagen (Type I)

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Collagen (Type I) is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 2 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 2,824 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 10 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 2 RCTs (1 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 2,824
Reported Trial Dosages 0.022 g · 600 μg/day · 0.004 g
Trial Duration Range 8 weeks · 12 months · 12 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (0.022 g · 600 μg/day · 0.004 g) over a structured 8 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (17 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (2 RCTs · 1 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (10 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Collagen (Type I) & Why Does Form Matter?

Collagen (Type I) is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (0.022 g, 600 μg/day, 0.004 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Collagen (Type I) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (2 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Collagen (Type I) acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Collagen (Type I) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 2 randomized controlled trials (1 double-blind, n = 2,824 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41574289 (2025) — "Meta-analysis of the effects of probiotic supplementation on bone turnover markers in middle-aged and elderly patients with osteoporosis." (DISCUSSION: Probiotic supplementation is associated with enhanced bone formation and reduced bone resorption in individuals with osteoporosis.) • PMID:41174264 (2026) — "Probiotic Supplementation and Bone Health Parameters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence from the currently available RCTs, probiotic supplementation appears to lead to modest but statistically significant improvement in lumbar spine BMD and, to a lesser extent, hip BMD in postmenopausal women.) • PMID:40949733 (2025) — "Effects of dietary supplements on bone turnover markers in women after menopause: a network meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Dietary supplementation may serve as an important strategy for enhancing bone health in women after menopause by regulating bone metabolism.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 37314058-1.58PMID 314905545.69 (3.58–7.8)PMID 25982806-0.1 (-0.14–-0.07)PMID 414708471.39 (1.08–1.8)-3Null (0)9.2Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 0.022 g · 600 μg/day · 0.004 g · 0.025 g over 8 weeks · 12 months · 12 weeks · 36 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Collagen (Type I), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (0.022 g · 600 μg/day · 0.004 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 8 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 17 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology (2025) PMID: 41574289 ↗
Meta-analysis of the effects of probiotic supplementation on bone turnover markers in middle-aged and elderly patients with osteoporosis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology involving n = 1,432 participants (SMD -0.35). Key conclusion: DISCUSSION: Probiotic supplementation is associated with enhanced bone formation and reduced bone resorption in individuals with osteoporosis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is highly prevalent among postmenopausal women and is characterized by a progressive 1-2% annual decline in bone mineral density (BMD). This deterioration contributes to more than 8.9 million fractures globally each year. The condition arises from an imbalance between bone formation and resorption. Emerging evidence suggests that probiotics may positively modulate bone metabolism through gut microbiota regulation, yet high-quality clinical data directly linking probiotic use to bone turnover markers remains limited. This meta-analysis investigates the effects of probiotic supplementation on bone formation and resorption markers in osteoporotic individuals. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,432 participants. The studies assessed various probiotic strains, dosages, and intervention periods ranging from 8 weeks to 12 months. Pooled effect sizes were calculated for key bone formation markers-procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and osteocalcin-and resorption markers, including C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I), N-terminal telopeptide (NTX), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP-5b). Subgroup and dose-response analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Probiotic supplementation significantly improved bone metabolism. Bone formation markers showed notable increases, including a significant rise in P1NP (MD = +8.4 μg/L; 95% CI: 3.1-13.7) and osteocalcin. Bone resorption markers, especially CTX-I, demonstrated significant reductions (SMD = -0.35; 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.18). Multi-strain probiotic formulations produced greater improvements in both bone formation and resorption compared with single-strain interventions. A clear dose-response trend was observed, with higher probiotic doses correlating with stronger increases in P1NP. Subgroup analyses showed that postmenopausal women experienced more pronounced benefits than mixed-gender groups. DISCUSSION: Probiotic supplementation is associated with enhanced bone formation and reduced bone resorption in individuals with osteoporosis. Multi-strain formulations and higher dosages yielded

02
META-ANALYSIS Osteoporosis international (2026) PMID: 41174264 ↗
Probiotic Supplementation and Bone Health Parameters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Osteoporosis international involving n = 16 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence from the currently available RCTs, probiotic supplementation appears to lead to modest but statistically significant improvement in lumbar spine BMD and, to a lesser extent, hip BMD in postmenopausal women.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Gut microbiota has been implicated in bone health. However, the extent of the skeletal benefits of probiotic supplementation in humans remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to appraise the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in improving bone health through a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the available randomized controlled trials. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched for RCTs reporting the effects of probiotic supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD), C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), or procollagen type 1 N-propeptide (P1NP). A random-effects model was used to generate the pooled weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Probiotic supplementation significantly increased lumbar spine aBMD (areal BMD) (+ 0.010; n = 16) and hip aBMD (+ 0.022 g/cm2; n = 9) but had no significant effect on femoral neck aBMD (n = 7), P1NP (n = 10), and CTX (n = 11). Moderate-to-high heterogeneity was present in all analyses, likely due to differences in participant characteristics and intervention characteristics. A tendency toward increased lumbar spine aBMD was observed across subgroups, although statistical significance was not always reached, while findings for other outcomes varied. Most trials included postmenopausal women, and restricting the analyses to this population yielded results consistent with the main analyses. The increase in lumbar spine aBMD remained significant regardless of trial exclusion, whereas the effect on hip aBMD became non-significant when key trials were omitted. CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence from the currently available RCTs, probiotic supplementation appears to lead to modest but statistically significant improvement in lumbar spine BMD and, to a lesser extent, hip BMD in postmenopausal women. © 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.

03
META-ANALYSIS PeerJ (2025) PMID: 40949733 ↗
Effects of dietary supplements on bone turnover markers in women after menopause: a network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in PeerJ. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Dietary supplementation may serve as an important strategy for enhancing bone health in women after menopause by regulating bone metabolism.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Diminished estrogen levels in women after menopause contribute to an elevated risk of decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and disturbed bone metabolism. Dietary supplements are extensively employed as substitutes for prescription drugs, serving as a significant approach to modulate bone metabolism and improve bone health. Nevertheless, a lack of robust evidence prevents clinicians and patients from making the best-informed choices at present. Accordingly, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to provide a comprehensive comparison of the effects of different dietary supplements on bone turnover biomarkers among postmenopausal women. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were retrieved from their inception to November 20, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the strength of dietary supplements in women after menopause were adopted in this research. Primary outcome indicators encompassed C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX). Risk of bias assessment was performed for each enrolled trial utilizing the ROB 2.0. A Bayesian NMA was conducted utilizing the R software (V4.4.1). Publication bias was assessed utilizing Stata 15.1. RESULTS: Forty-three RCTs involving 5,184 postmenopausal women were adopted. Research findings revealed that CTX levels decreased most substantially with vitamin E supplementation (SUCRA: 82.37%). Combining vitamin D and vitamin K most effectively elevated P1NP (SUCRA: 100.00%) and OC (SUCRA: 97.05%) levels. The greatest increase in BAP levels (SUCRA: 95.50%) was observed with vitamin K supplementation. Calcium supplementation yielded the largest elevation in ALP levels (SUCRA: 96.68%). Furthermore, protein supplementation resulted in the most significant reduction in NTX levels (SUCRA: 81.20%). CONCLUSION: Dietary supplementation may serve as an important strategy for enhancing bone health in women after menopause by regulating bone metabolism. By promoting bone formation and inhibiting bone

04
META-ANALYSIS Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) (2024) PMID: 39136851 ↗
The Influence of Nutrition Intervention on the P1NP and CTX-1 Response to an Acute Exercise Bout: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). Key conclusion: Meta-analysis indicated that calcium intake, whether provided via supplements, diet or infusion, reduced exercise-induced increases in CTX-1 (effect size - 1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI] - 2.2 to - 0.05), with substantially larger effects observed in studies that delivered calc
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Although nutrition and exercise both influence bone metabolism, little is currently known about their interaction, or whether nutritional intervention can modulate the bone biomarker response to acute exercise. Improved understanding of the relationships between nutrition, exercise and bone metabolism may have substantial potential to inform nutritional interventions to protect the bone health of exercising individuals, and to elucidate mechanisms by which exercise and nutrition influence bone. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to synthesise available evidence related to the influence of nutrition on the response of the bone biomarkers procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX-1) to acute exercise, using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach. METHODS: Studies evaluating the influence of nutritional status or intervention on the bone biomarker response to an acute exercise bout were included and separated into four categories: (1) feeding status and energy availability, (2) macronutrients, (3) micronutrients and (4) other. Studies conducted on healthy human populations of any age or training status were included. Meta-analysis was conducted when data from at least five studies with independent datasets were available. In the case of insufficient data to warrant meta-analysis, results from individual studies were narratively synthesised and standardised mean effect sizes visually represented. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles were included. Of these, three investigated feeding status or energy availability, eight macronutrients, eight micronutrients (all calcium) and six other interventions including dairy products or collagen supplementation. Three studies had more than one intervention and were included in all relevant outcomes. The largest and most commonly reported effects were for the bone resorption marker CTX-1. Meta-analysis indicated that calcium intake, whether provided via supplements, diet or infusion, reduced exercise-induced increases in CTX-1 (effect size - 1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI] - 2.2 to - 0.05), with substantially larger effects observed in studies that delivered calcium via d

05
META-ANALYSIS The British journal of nutrition (2024) PMID: 38221822 ↗
Effect of vitamin D supplementation or fortification on bone turnover markers in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in The British journal of nutrition involving n = 100 participants. Key conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation/fortification significantly reduced bone resorption markers in women.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Vitamin D is a vital indicator of musculoskeletal health, as it plays an important role through the regulation of bone and mineral metabolism. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation/fortification on bone turnover markers in women. All human randomised clinical trials reported changes in bone resorption markers (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (sCTX) and urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (uNTX)) or bone formation factors (osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and procollagen type-1 intact N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)) following vitamin D administration in women (aged ≥ 18 years) were considered. Mean differences (MD) and their respective 95 % CI were calculated based on fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity status. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression models, sensitivity analysis, risk of bias, publication bias and the quality of the included studies were also evaluated. We found that vitamin D supplementation had considerable effect on sCTX (MD: -0·038, n 22) and OC (MD: -0·610, n 24) with high heterogeneity and uNTX (MD: -8·188, n 6) without heterogeneity. Our results showed that age, sample size, dose, duration, baseline vitamin D level, study region and quality of studies might be sources of heterogeneity in this meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis also revealed significant reductions in P1NP level in dose less than 600 μg/d and larger study sample size (>100 participants). Moreover, no significant change was found in BALP level. Vitamin D supplementation/fortification significantly reduced bone resorption markers in women. However, results were inconsistent for bone formation markers.

06
META-ANALYSIS European journal of clinical investigation (2023) PMID: 37314058 ↗
Impact of vitamin D supplementation on markers of bone turnover: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of clinical investigation; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -1.58). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Vitamin D administration decreases DPD, PINP and ALP levels, indicating a reduced bone turnover following the intervention.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: The effects of vitamin D administration on bone turnover markers (BTMs) in adults are controversial. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis of available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the impact of vitamin D supplementation on BTMs. METHODS: To identify relevant RCTs, we searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase databases for manuscripts published up to July 2022. The present study was conducted in agreement with the PRISMA guidelines. Weighed mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to calculate the magnitude of the effect of the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 42 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The age of the participants enrolled in the RCTs ranged from 19.4 to 84 years. The pooled results depicted a decrease in deoxypyridinoline (DPD) concentrations (WMD: -1.58 nmol/mmol, 95% CI: -2.55, -.61, p = .001) following vitamin D supplementation. In addition, subgroup analyses demonstrated that vitamin D administration notably reduced procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) levels in individuals aged >50 years and led to a pronounced decrease in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values when the intervention lasted >12 weeks. No significant effect was observed on other BTMs, for example, collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX) and osteocalcin (OC) levels. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D administration decreases DPD, PINP and ALP levels, indicating a reduced bone turnover following the intervention. Other BTMs, for example, CTX or OC values, were not affected by vitamin D prescription. Vitamin D supplementation may exert a positive effect on some important BTMs. © 2023 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

07
META-ANALYSIS Clinical research in cardiology (2022) PMID: 34999932 ↗
Biomarkers as predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation post ablation: an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical research in cardiology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Ranking biomarkers based on the strength of association with outcome provides each biomarker relative capacity to predict AF recurrence.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: A high proportion of patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) experience recurrence of arrhythmia. This meta-analysis aims to identify pre-ablation serum biomarker(s) associated with arrhythmia recurrence to improve patient selection before CA. METHODS: A systematic approach following PRISMA reporting guidelines was utilised in libraries (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus) and supplemented by scanning through bibliographies of articles. Biomarker levels were compared using a random-effects model and presented as odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity was examined by meta-regression and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: In total, 73 studies were identified after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Nine out of 22 biomarkers showed association with recurrence of AF after CA. High levels of N-Terminal-pro-B-type-Natriuretic Peptide [OR (95% CI), 3.11 (1.80-5.36)], B-type Natriuretic Peptide [BNP, 2.91 (1.74-4.88)], high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein [2.04 (1.28-3.23)], Carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I [1.89 (1.16-3.08)] and Interleukin-6 [1.83 (1.18-2.84)] were strongly associated with identifying patients with AF recurrence. Meta-regression highlighted that AF type had a significant impact on BNP levels (heterogeneity R2 = 55%). Subgroup analysis showed that high BNP levels were more strongly associated with AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF (PAF) cohorts compared to the addition of non-PAF patients. Egger's test ruled out the presence of publication bias from small-study effects. CONCLUSION: Ranking biomarkers based on the strength of association with outcome provides each biomarker relative capacity to predict AF recurrence. This will provide randomised controlled trials, a guide to choosing a priori tool for identifying patients likely to revert to AF, which are required to substantiate these findings. © 2021. Crown.

08
META-ANALYSIS Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) (2022) PMID: 34792092 ↗
The Effects of Milk Supplementation on Bone Health Indices in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) involving n = 13 participants. Key conclusion: The addition of milk to the diet may potentially increase the likelihood of preventing bone loss by restoring bone homeostasis through the modulation of the calcium-vitamin D-PTH axis, bone remodeling rate, and growth hormone/IGF-1 axis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Milk contains a number of bone-beneficial nutrients. However, milk, due to the D-galactose content, might have unfavorable effects on bone health. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to clarify the effects of milk supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers [N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx), osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), and procollagen type 1 N-propeptide (P1NP)], and hormonal indices related to bone metabolism [parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)] in adults. The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled effect sizes. A total of 20 RCTs were included. The trial duration ranged from 1 mo to 36 mo. Milk supplementation resulted in a small but significant increase in BMD at the hip (+0.004 g/cm2; n = 9 RCTs) and lumbar spine (+0.025 g/cm2; n = 7), but did not significantly affect whole-body BMD (n = 3) and femoral neck BMD (n = 7). Milk supplementation reduced the concentrations of P1NP (-5.20 ng/mL; n = 9), CTx (-0.16 ng/mL; n = 9), and NTx (-8.66 nmol bone collagen equivalents/mmol creatinine; n = 3). The concentrations of osteocalcin (n = 9) and BALP (n = 3) were not affected by milk supplementation. Reduced parathyroid hormone PTH (-1.01 pg/mL; n = 13) concentrations and increased IGF-1 (+1.79 nmol/l; n = 4) concentrations were observed with milk supplementation. 25(OH)D (+3.73 ng/mL; n = 11) concentrations were increased with vitamin-D fortified milk supplementation. The addition of milk to the diet may potentially increase the likelihood of preventing bone loss by restoring bone homeostasis through the modulation of the calcium-vitamin D-PTH axis, bone remodeling rate, and growth hormone/IGF-1 axis. © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

09
META-ANALYSIS Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2019) PMID: 31490554 ↗
Effects of resveratrol supplementation on bone biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences involving n = 264 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD 5.69). Key conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that resveratrol supplementation increased some key bone biomarkers, such as ALP and BAP.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The current study presents a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on resveratrol and bone health biomarkers. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (until September 2018) were searched to identify the potential RCTs with information on resveratrol supplementation and bone metabolism biomarkers. Mean differences (MD) were analyzed using a random-effects model. Pooling six RCTs (eight treatment arms with 264 subjects) together identified no significant reduction of serum Ca, osteocalcin, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, and procollagen I N-terminal propeptide values after resveratrol supplementation over placebo treatment. However, a significant increase in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (MD: 5.69 mg/mL, 95% CI: 3.58-7.80, I2 = 95.7%, P < 0.001) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (MD: 10.57 mmHg, 95% CI: 5.36-15.78, I2 = 99.2%, P < 0.001) values was observed after resveratrol treatment relative to placebo. The findings of this study indicate that resveratrol supplementation increased some key bone biomarkers, such as ALP and BAP. Further precise clinical trials of the effects of resveratrol supplementation on bone health should be conducted. © 2019 New York Academy of Sciences.

10
META-ANALYSIS Obesity surgery (2016) PMID: 25982806 ↗
Changes in Bone Metabolism in Morbidly Obese Patients After Bariatric Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Meta-Analysis published in Obesity surgery involving n = 344 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (MD -0.1). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: BMD was significantly decreased, while bone turnover was elevated, and bone remodeling was accelerated following bariatric surgery.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The aim is to evaluate via meta-analysis bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) in morbidly obese patients before and after bariatric surgery. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published before January 2014. The following outcomes were evaluated: serum calcium, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], serum or urinary N-telopeptide (NTX), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), and bone mineral density (BMD). RESULTS: Ten studies, including 344 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Results showed a significant decrease in serum calcium (MD = -0.10, 95 %CI -0.14 to -0.07, P < 0.00001) and increase in serum PTH (MD = 12.41, 95 %CI 6.51 to 18.31, P < 0.00001) but no significant difference in serum 25(OH)D (MD = 1.35, 95 %CI -1.12 to 3.83, P = 0.28) following bariatric surgery. There were significant increases in serum or urinary NTX (MD = 18.49, 95 %CI 3.33 to 33.66, P = 0.02) and BSAP (MD = 7.47, 95 %CI 0.21 to 14.72, P = 0.04) but a significant decrease in BMD (MD = -0.08, 95 %CI -0.13 to -0.04, P < 0.00001) after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: BMD was significantly decreased, while bone turnover was elevated, and bone remodeling was accelerated following bariatric surgery. Basal bone metabolism should be evaluated preoperatively. To prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone loss, calcium and vitamin D should be monitored closely and supplemented accordingly after the surgery.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category