NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

D-Mannose

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

D-Mannose is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 27 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (4 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 21,609 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 27 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 4 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 8 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 21,609
Reported Trial Dosages 3g · 2 g/day · 200 mg
Trial Duration Range 40 days · 5 months · 1 months
Reading Time ~14 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 27 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (3g · 2 g/day · 200 mg) over a structured 40 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (27 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (14 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (8 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (4 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is D-Mannose & Why Does Form Matter?

D-Mannose is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 27 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (3g, 2 g/day, 200 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for D-Mannose frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (8 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, D-Mannose acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns D-Mannose an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 27 PubMed studies: 4 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 21,609 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39095666 (2025) — "Nonantibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (CONCLUSIONS: D-mannose, triple therapy, vaccine, probiotics, and cranberry serve as potential nonantibiotic intervention options for clinical UTI prevention.) • PMID:40906289 (2025) — "Rapid and Esthetic Wound Healing in Surgery by Applying a Powdered Mixture of Mannose and Calcium Propionate." (CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding time can be reduced by approximately 50% when the wound is treated with a mixture containing 40 moles of D-mannose per 1 mole of calcium propionate and wound healing time by approximately 40% compared to D-mannose.) • PMID:40853430 (2026) — "Comparison of increased hydration, D-mannose, and antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infection prevention in premenopausal women: a three-arm randomized-controlled study." (Increased hydration, while less effective, remains a safe, economical, and easily implementable baseline measure.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 390956660.65PMID 410047040.57 (0.29–1.15)PMID 285549261.52 (0.61–0.95)0.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 3g · 2 g/day · 200 mg · 3 g over 40 days · 5 months · 1 months · 12 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for D-Mannose, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (3g · 2 g/day · 200 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 40 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (27 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Infection (2025) PMID: 39095666 ↗
Nonantibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Infection involving n = 10,495 participants (RR 0.65). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: D-mannose, triple therapy, vaccine, probiotics, and cranberry serve as potential nonantibiotic intervention options for clinical UTI prevention.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Recent guidelines indicated that, in addition to antibiotics, nonantibiotic interventions serve as available preventive options for urinary tract infections (UTIs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of various nonantibiotic interventions in preventing UTIs. METHODS: The authors systematically searched databases for eligible studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on one or more nonantibiotic interventions for UTI prevention, with the incidence of UTIs being a key outcome measure. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, and follow-up. RESULTS: 50 RCTs comprising 10,495 subjects and investigating 14 interventions, were included. Nearly 80% of the RCTs utilized double-blind or triple-blind designs. In the whole group, D-mannose (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 0.21 to 0.56), vaccine (RR 0.65, 0.52 to 0.82), probiotics (RR 0.69, 0.50 to 0.94), cranberry (RR 0.72, 0.60 to 0.87), and triple therapy (cranberry plus probiotics plus vitamin A) (RR 0.27, 0.09 to 0.87), exhibited a significant reduction in UTI incidence compared to the placebo. Probiotics (RR 0.50, 0.28 to 0.89) were the most effective in the nonadult group, while vitamin D (RR 0.46, 0.27 to 0.81) showed the highest efficacy in the long follow-up group (≥ 1 year). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the interventions and the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: D-mannose, triple therapy, vaccine, probiotics, and cranberry serve as potential nonantibiotic intervention options for clinical UTI prevention. © 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

02
CLINICAL STUDY Aesthetic plastic surgery (2025) PMID: 40906289 ↗
Rapid and Esthetic Wound Healing in Surgery by Applying a Powdered Mixture of Mannose and Calcium Propionate.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Aesthetic plastic surgery. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding time can be reduced by approximately 50% when the wound is treated with a mixture containing 40 moles of D-mannose per 1 mole of calcium propionate and wound healing time by approximately 40% compared to D-mannose.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Wound healing is a current problem in surgery. Wounds most commonly occur from surgery, accidents, and burns. The purpose of this study was to reduce bleeding time and wound healing time as well as prevent or mitigate scarring by applying D-mannose with calcium propionate mixtures directly to the wound in powder form. METHODS: This study was a placebo, randomized, double-blind, crossover experiment involving a single group of twenty-five subjects. The number of incisions made was equal to the number of treatments required. Each subject had one incision per day. Only one treatment was applied to each wound. By the end, each subject was treated with all test mixtures and the placebo substance. RESULTS: The results show that the bleeding time can be reduced to about 50% compared to D-mannose when treating the wound with a mixture containing 20-60 moles of D-mannose per 1 mole of powdered calcium propionate. The wound healing time was reduced by about 40% compared to D-mannose. No visible scarring was observed after 40 days on skin treated with the mannose and calcium propionate mixture. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding time can be reduced by approximately 50% when the wound is treated with a mixture containing 40 moles of D-mannose per 1 mole of calcium propionate and wound healing time by approximately 40% compared to D-mannose. Both substances contribute to the destruction of pathogens and to the processes of new tissue formation, which accelerates the healing process. Treatment with this powdered mixture prevents skin scarring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . © 2025. The Author(s).

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) International urology and nephrology (2026) PMID: 40853430 ↗
Comparison of increased hydration, D-mannose, and antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infection prevention in premenopausal women: a three-arm randomized-controlled study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International urology and nephrology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Increased hydration, while less effective, remains a safe, economical, and easily implementable baseline measure.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are a common and impactful clinical challenge in premenopausal women, significantly affecting quality of life and imposing high healthcare costs. Despite their prevalence, robust comparative studies evaluating preventive strategies are scarce, and growing antimicrobial resistance necessitates exploring non-antibiotic alternatives. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of increased hydration, D-mannose, and antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing recurrent UTIs in premenopausal women. METHODS: This 12-month, prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, three-arm parallel study enrolled 75 premenopausal women (18-49 years) with ≥ 3 UTIs/year. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to increased hydration, D-mannose, or low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Primary endpoints were number of UTI episodes/year. Secondary endpoints included time to first UTI and adverse events. Statistical analysis utilized ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: All three groups demonstrated some degree of UTI prevention. The antibiotic prophylaxis group showed the lowest rUTI incidence (mean 0.2 episodes/year, median 0), significantly lower than the increased hydration group (mean 1.08 episodes/year, median 1; p < 0.05). D-mannose showed intermediate efficacy (mean 0.32 episodes/year, median 0), trending toward significance compared to increased hydration. Mean time to first UTI was longest in the antibiotic group (4.5 months) vs. D-mannose (2.5 months) and hydration (1 month). Minor adverse events (e.g., mild gastrointestinal issues) were more frequent with antibiotics; no severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis remains the most effective strategy for rUTI prevention in premenopausal women. However, D-mannose emerges as a promising, safe non-antibiotic alternative, demonstrating notable efficacy in reducing episodes. Increased hydration, while less effective, remains a safe, economical, and easily implementable baseline measure. These findings advocate for a personalized approach to rUTI prevention, balancing efficacy, safety profile, and patient preference, particularly to mitig

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Expert review of anti-infective therapy (2025) PMID: 40162673 ↗
Adding collagen, propolis plus quercetin, bacillus coagulans, hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate to D-mannose avoids symptoms and prevents recurrence in women with recurrent urinary tract infections: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Expert review of anti-infective therapy; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Combining fosfomycin and an integrated D-mannose supplement for managing rUTIs offers a potential reduction in antibiotic reliance.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of a new D-mannose dietary supplement containing D-mannose, Propolis-Quercetin, Bacillus Coagulans, Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulfate with fosfomycin in reducing rUTI episodes and improving quality of life. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Single-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at tertiary-care hospital in Italy. Women aged 21-65 with a history of rUTIs were randomized into three groups: fosfomycin, the dietary supplement, and a combination of both treatments. Primary outcome was frequency of rUTI episodes per month. RESULTS: Combination therapy demonstrated greatest reduction in rUTI episodes per month at 12 months compared to fosfomycin or supplement monotherapy (0.23 ± 0.37 vs 0.58 ± 0.67 and 1.12 ± 0.96 for fosfomycin and supplement monotherapy respectively; p < 0.05) and to supplement monotherapy at 6 months (0.69 ± 1.03 vs 1.43 ± 1.33; p < 0.05), with significant improvement of ICIQ-FLUTS domains compared to other groups at 12 months (p < 0.05). Combination therapy had lower number of women matching rUTI criteria (55.32% vs 76.47% and 84%; p < 0.05) and symptoms remission at 12 months (89.36% vs 56.86% and 20%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combining fosfomycin and an integrated D-mannose supplement for managing rUTIs offers a potential reduction in antibiotic reliance. Further large-scale studies are recommended to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT06659016).

05
CLINICAL STUDY Urologiia (Moscow, Russia (2024) PMID: 39563582 ↗
[Experience with UroBest in patients with acute cystitis].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Urologiia (Moscow, Russia involving n = 90 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: UroBest has a favorable efficacy and safety profile.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of UroBest complex in sachets for combined therapy of patients with acute cystitis in comparison with products of similar composition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The randomized multi-center study included 90 patients with acute cystitis aged 18 to 49 years who were treated at the clinical bases of SRC FMBC, FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia, Altai State Medical University and Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko. Patients of all groups received Fosfomycin trometamol in a dosage of 3g once, at night. Depending on the additional drug received, they were divided into 3 groups of 30 patients each. In group 1, they took UroBest 1 sachet daily for 7 days from the first day of therapy, NefroBest-N one capsule 2 times a day for 1 month also from the first day of therapy, in combination with UroBest complex in the first week. In group 2, UroBest 1 sachet daily for 7 days was administered, while in group 3, biologically active supplement (BAA) "Uronext" 1 sachet daily for 7 days was given. The study included 4 control points, where the degree and dynamics of changes in laboratory parameters (urinalysis, complete cell count, urine culture with determination of sensitivity to antibiotics), quality of life according to the questionnaire, and pain intensity according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed, as well as the drug tolerability based on the analysis of adverse events. RESULTS: The efficacy and safety data were evaluated. Administration of complex preparations with extracts of medicinal plants as an additional to antibacterial therapy led to significant improvement of all parameters, except for the level of leucocytes in the complete cell count. The most pronounced improvement was observed in groups 1, and lesser improvement was noted in group 2. One patient in group 3 had an adverse event, which was resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: UroBest has a favorable efficacy and safety profile. According to our experience, combination of UroBest and NefroBest-N complexes leads to more pronounced positive changes in laboratory parameters and patient's condition according to the questionnaires compared to Uro

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The journal of sexual medicine (2024) PMID: 38721680 ↗
Oral preparation of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, N-acetylglucosamine, and vitamin C improves sexual and urinary symptoms in participants with recurrent urinary tract infections: a randomized crossover trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The journal of sexual medicine; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (OR 3.9). Key conclusion: In logistic regression analyses, the intervention group was associated with early improvement in sexual symptoms (odds ratio, 3.9; P = .04) and urinary symptoms (odds ratio, 5.1; P = .01) after accounting for clinical confounders.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Intravesical instillation of hyaluronic acid (HA) has been associated with reduced sexual dysfunction in participants with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs), but the efficacy of an oral treatment has never been investigated. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of an oral preparation of HA, chondroitin sulfate, N-acetylglucosamine, and vitamin C in improving sexual and urinary symptoms in a cohort of reproductive-age participants with rUTI. METHODS: In a monocentric randomized crossover pilot trial, participants with rUTI who were referred to our institute between March 2022 and April 2023 were randomized 1:1 in 2 groups: intervention vs control. All participants had an oral preparation of cranberry, D-mannose, propolis extract, turmeric, and Boswellia twice a day for 3 months. The intervention group also included an oral preparation of HA, chondroitin sulfate, N-acetylglucosamine, and vitamin C once a day for 3 months. Crossover of treatment occurred at 3 months for an additional 3 months. At baseline and 3 and 6 months, participants were evaluated clinically and with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the impact of the intervention on urinary and sexual symptoms at each follow-up assessment. OUTCOMES: Improvement in sexual and urinary symptoms as measured by the FSFI and IPSS. RESULTS: Overall, 27 (54%) participants had an FSFI score <26.5 at enrollment. At 3 months, FSFI scores were higher in the intervention group vs control (P < .001), but IPSS scores were lower (P = .03). After crossover of treatment, FSFI and IPSS scores remained stable in the intervention group. However, after crossover, the control group showed a significant improvement in IPSS and FSFI scores (all P < .01) vs the 3-month assessment. At last follow-up, urinary and sexual symptoms were comparable between groups. In logistic regression analyses, the intervention group was associated with early improvement in sexual symptoms (odds ratio, 3.9; P = .04) and urinary symptoms (odds ratio, 5.1; P = .01) after accounting for clinical confounders. CLINICAL IMPLICATIO

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nefrologia (2024) PMID: 38637262 ↗
Randomized clinical trial of non-antibiotic prophylaxis with d-Mannose plus Proanthocyanidins vs. Proanthocyanidins alone for urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in de novo kidney transplant recipients: The Manotras study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nefrologia. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Non-antibiotic therapy is an unmet need to prevent UTI after kidney transplantation; however, the use of d-Mannose plus PAC does not seem capable to prevent it.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Studies analyzing non-antibiotic alternatives in kidney transplant UTI's are lacking. d-Mannose, a simple sugar, inhibits bacterial attachment to the urothelium, as does Proanthocyanidins; both could act as a synergic strategy preventing UTI; nonetheless their efficacy and safety have not been evaluated in kidney transplant population yet. METHODS: This is a pilot prospective, double-blind randomized trial. Sixty de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized (1:1) to receive a prophylactic strategy based on a 24-h prolonged release formulation of d-Mannose plus Proanthocyanidins vs. Proanthocyanidins (PAC) alone. The supplements were taken for the first 3 months after kidney transplant and then followed up for 3 months as well. The main objective of the study was to search if the addition of Mannose to PAC alone reduced the incidence of UTI and/or asymptomatic bacteriuria in the first 6 months post-transplantation. RESULTS: 27% of patients experienced one UTI episode (cystitis or pyelonephritis) while asymptomatic bacteriuria was very common (57%). Incidences according UTI type or AB were: 7% vs. 4% for cystitis episode (p 0.3), 4% vs. 5% for pyelonephritis (p 0.5) and 17% vs. 14% for asymptomatic bacteriuria (p 0.4) for patients in the Mannose+PAC group vs. PAC group respectively. The most frequent bacteria isolated in both groups was Escherichia coli (28% of all episodes), UTI or AB due to E. coli was not different according to study group (30% vs. 23% for Mannose+PAC vs. PAC alone p 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Non-antibiotic therapy is an unmet need to prevent UTI after kidney transplantation; however, the use of d-Mannose plus PAC does not seem capable to prevent it.

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) JAMA internal medicine (2024) PMID: 38587819 ↗
d-Mannose for Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Among Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in JAMA internal medicine involving n = 7,591 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.26. Key conclusion: The proportion contacting ambulatory care with a clinically suspected UTI was 150 of 294 (51.0%) in the d-mannose group and 161 of 289 (55.7%) in the placebo group (risk difference, -5%; 95% CI, -13% to 3%; P = .26).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Comment in JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jun 1;184(6):629-630. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0261. IMPORTANCE: Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common debilitating condition in women, with limited prophylactic options. d-Mannose has shown promise in trials based in secondary care, but effectiveness in placebo-controlled studies and community settings has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether d-mannose taken for 6 months reduces the proportion of women with recurrent UTI experiencing a medically attended UTI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 2-group, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial took place across 99 primary care centers in the UK. Participants were recruited between March 28, 2019, and January 31, 2020, with 6 months of follow-up. Participants were female, 18 years or older, living in the community, and had evidence in their primary care record of consultations for at least 2 UTIs in the preceding 6 months or 3 UTIs in 12 months. Invitation to participate was made by their primary care center. A total of 7591 participants were approached, 830 responded, and 232 were ineligible or did not proceed to randomization. Statistical analysis was reported in December 2022. INTERVENTION: Two grams daily of d-mannose powder or matched volume of placebo powder. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women experiencing at least 1 further episode of clinically suspected UTI for which they contacted ambulatory care within 6 months of study entry. Secondary outcomes included symptom duration, antibiotic use, time to next medically attended UTI, number of suspected UTIs, and UTI-related hospital admissions. RESULTS: Of 598 women eligible (mean [range] age, 58 [18-93] years), 303 were randomized to d-mannose (50.7%) and 295 to placebo (49.3%). Primary outcome data were available for 583 participants (97.5%). The proportion contacting ambulatory care with a clinically suspected UTI was 150 of 294 (51.0%) in the d-mannose group and 161 of 289 (55.7%) in the placebo group (risk difference, -5%; 95% CI, -13% to 3%; P = .26). Estimates were similar in per protocol analyses, imputation analyses, and

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2023) PMID: 37374369 ↗
D-Mannose Plus Saccharomyces boulardii to Prevent Urinary Tract Infections and Discomfort after Cystoscopy: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) involving n = 32 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.044. Key conclusion: Conclusions: D-Mannose plus Saccharomyces boulardii administered after cystoscopy seem to significantly reduce the incidence of UTI, the severity of LUTS, and the intensity of local discomfort.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background and Objectives: Patients undergoing cystoscopy can experience discomfort or pain during the procedure. In some cases, a urinary tract infection (UTI) with storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) may occur in the days following the procedure. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of D-mannose plus Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of UTIs and discomfort in patients undergoing cystoscopy. Materials and Methods: A single-center prospective randomized pilot study was conducted between April 2019 and June 2020. Patients undergoing cystoscopy for suspected bladder cancer (BCa) or in the follow-up for BCa were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups: D-Mannose plus Saccharomyces boulardii (Group A) vs. no treatment (Group B). A urine culture was prescribed regardless of symptoms 7 days before and 7 days after cystoscopy. The International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS), 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) for local pain/discomfort, and EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered before cystoscopy and 7 days after. Results: A total of 32 patients (16 per group) were enrolled. No urine culture was positive in Group A 7 days after cystoscopy, while 3 patients (18.8%) in Group B had a positive control urine culture (p = 0.044). All patients with positive control urine culture reported the onset or worsening of urinary symptoms, excluding the diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. At 7 days after cystoscopy, the median IPSS of Group A was significantly lower than that of Group B (10.5 vs. 16.5 points; p = 0.021), and at 7 days, the median NRS for local discomfort/pain of Group A was significantly lower than that for Group B (1.5 vs. 4.0 points; p = 0.012). No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the median IPSS-QoL and EORTC QLQ-C30 was found between groups. Conclusions: D-Mannose plus Saccharomyces boulardii administered after cystoscopy seem to significantly reduce the incidence of UTI, the severity of LUTS, and the intensity of local discomfort.

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.) (2023) PMID: 36808931 ↗
d-Mannose for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Prevention in Postmenopausal Women Using Vaginal Estrogen: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.) involving n = 545 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (HR 0.76). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: d-Mannose is a well-tolerated nutraceutical, but further research is needed to determine whether d-mannose in combination with VET has a significant, beneficial effect beyond VET alone in postmenopausal women with rUTIs.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

IMPORTANCE: Further research is needed to determine whether d-mannose plus vaginal estrogen therapy (VET) is beneficial over VET alone for recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) prevention. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate d-mannose efficacy for rUTI prevention in postmenopausal women using VET. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing d-mannose (2 g/d) with control. Participants were required to have a history of uncomplicated rUTIs and to remain on VET throughout the trial. They were followed up 90 days for incident UTIs. Cumulative UTI incidences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Cox proportional hazards regression. For the planned interim analysis, P < 0.001 was considered statistically significant. Futility analysis was performed by generating post hoc conditional power for multiple scenarios. RESULTS: We evaluated 545 patients for frequent/recurrent UTIs from March 1, 2018, to January 18, 2020. Of these women, 213 had culture-proven rUTIs, 71 were eligible, 57 enrolled, 44 began their planned 90-day study period, and 32 completed the study. At interim analysis, the overall cumulative UTI incidence was 46.6%; 41.1% in the treatment arm (median time to first UTI, 24 days) and 50.4% in the control arm (median, 21 days); hazard ratio, 0.76; 99.9% confidence interval, 0.15-3.97. d-Mannose was well tolerated with high participant adherence. Futility analysis suggested the study lacked power to detect the planned (25%) or observed (9%) difference as statistically significant; the study was halted before conclusion. CONCLUSIONS: d-Mannose is a well-tolerated nutraceutical, but further research is needed to determine whether d-mannose in combination with VET has a significant, beneficial effect beyond VET alone in postmenopausal women with rUTIs.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category