NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2024

DMSO (Topical)

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

DMSO (Topical) is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 21 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (1 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 3 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 9,335 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 21 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 1 Meta · 3 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 3 RCTs (3 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 9,335
Reported Trial Dosages 1 g · 25 mg · 150 mg
Trial Duration Range 3 weeks · 8 weeks · 12 weeks
Reading Time ~11 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 21 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1 g · 25 mg · 150 mg) over a structured 3 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (21 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (8 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (3 RCTs · 3 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (1 meta-analyses · 3 reviews)
01

What Is DMSO (Topical) & Why Does Form Matter?

DMSO (Topical) is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 21 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1 g, 25 mg, 150 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for DMSO (Topical) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (3 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, DMSO (Topical) acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns DMSO (Topical) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 21 PubMed studies: 1 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 3 randomized controlled trials (3 double-blind, n = 9,335 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39085322 (2024) — "Randomized placebo controlled trial of phytoterpenes in DMSO for the treatment of plantar fasciitis." (Using the validated foot function index 78.1% of patients reported an 85% or greater decrease in their total pain score by day 10 while placebo treatment was without effect (One Way ANOVA, P < 0.01).) • PMID:36385713 (2023) — "Quality-of-life outcomes following topical melatonin application against acute radiation dermatitis in patients with early breast cancer: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial." (There was no difference in the BS score on the last day of radiation, however, we found that the patients in the melatonin group had significantly lower BS scores over the entire duration of the trial.) • PMID:35217280 (2022) — "Randomized trial of topical ascorbic acid in DMSO versus imiquimod for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma." (In addition, ascorbic acid was associated with fewer adverse effects than imiquimod.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1 g · 25 mg · 150 mg over 3 weeks · 8 weeks · 12 weeks · 26 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for DMSO (Topical), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1 g · 25 mg · 150 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 3 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (21 Studies) · 8 Quantitative Analyses

01
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Scientific reports (2024) PMID: 39085322 ↗
Randomized placebo controlled trial of phytoterpenes in DMSO for the treatment of plantar fasciitis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Scientific reports; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: Using the validated foot function index 78.1% of patients reported an 85% or greater decrease in their total pain score by day 10 while placebo treatment was without effect (One Way ANOVA, P < 0.01).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain in adults with an overall prevalence of 0.85% in the adult population of the US, affecting over 2 million adults annually. Most current treatment modalities are not supported by sufficient evidence to recommend one particular strategy over another. Topical application of analgesics for soft tissue pain is well established, however the plantar fascia presents challenges in this regard due to thick skin, fibrotic tissue, and an often thickened fat pad. Sixty-two patients with plantar fasciitis were randomized to a placebo controlled trial testing the efficacy of a topical solution of plant terpenes containing camphor, menthol, eugenol, eucalyptol, and vanillin. Skin permeation of the mixture was enhanced with 15% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), 1% limonene, and rosemary oil. One ml of solution was applied topically twice daily, and pain scores evaluated on Day 0, Day 1, Day 3, and Day 10. Using the validated foot function index 78.1% of patients reported an 85% or greater decrease in their total pain score by day 10 while placebo treatment was without effect (One Way ANOVA, P < 0.01). This study adapts the treatment modality of topical analgesia for soft tissue pain to a problematic area of the body and shows therapeutic promise.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05467631. © 2024. The Author(s).

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of pineal research (2023) PMID: 36385713 ↗
Quality-of-life outcomes following topical melatonin application against acute radiation dermatitis in patients with early breast cancer: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of pineal research involving n = 65 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.333. Key conclusion: There was no difference in the BS score on the last day of radiation, however, we found that the patients in the melatonin group had significantly lower BS scores over the entire duration of the trial.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was to investigate whether topical melatonin administered during radiation therapy could increase the quality of life in patients with primary breast cancer. Patients were followed from the first radiation fraction until 3 weeks after the last. The patients applied 1 g of cream to the irradiated area of the skin twice daily, consisting of either 25 mg/g melatonin and 150 mg/g dimethyl sulfoxide, or a placebo cream. Outcomes were the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's quality-of-life questionnaires for breast cancer (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23) on the last day of radiation therapy. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the breast symptom (BS) scores over the entire duration of the trial in a repeated measures linear model. We included 65 patients and had 17 drop-outs, thus totaling 26 and 22 patients in the melatonin and placebo groups, respectively. BS scores on the last day of radiation did not differ between groups (p = .333). However, the linear model analyzing BS for the entire duration showed that melatonin significantly decreased the symptoms (p = .001). There was no difference in the BS score on the last day of radiation, however, we found that the patients in the melatonin group had significantly lower BS scores over the entire duration of the trial. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Pineal Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie (2022) PMID: 35217280 ↗
Randomized trial of topical ascorbic acid in DMSO versus imiquimod for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: In addition, ascorbic acid was associated with fewer adverse effects than imiquimod.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States and among Caucasians worldwide, with more people diagnosed each year than all other cancers combined. Basal cell cancer is the most common form with an estimated 4.3 million cases diagnosed annually, and treatment costs estimated at $4.8 billion. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy of a topical solution consisting of 30% ascorbic acid in 95% dimethylsulfoxide with topical imiquimod in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Twenty-five patients with 29 biopsy confirmed basal cell carcinomas were randomly assigned to receive either the topically applied ascorbic acid treatment twice daily for 8 weeks or topical imiquimod, a standard and well characterized topical treatment. After 8 weeks, post-treatment biopsy of lesions showed complete resolution of 13/15 (86.7%) in the ascorbic acid group, while 8/14 (57.1%) lesions in the IMQ group were resolved (p < 0.05 Chi Square). Topical ascorbic acid was superior at 8 weeks, and non-inferior at 12 weeks to topical imiquimod in the treatment of low risk nodular and superficial lesions. In addition, ascorbic acid was associated with fewer adverse effects than imiquimod. 70% of patients in the imiquinod group showed residual hypopigmentation at 30mo follow up versus 0% in the ascorbate group.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology (2022) PMID: 34877858 ↗
Effectiveness and safety of topical amphotericin B in 30% dimethyl sulfoxide cream versus 30% dimethyl sulfoxide cream for nondermatophyte onychomycosis treatment: A pilot study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology. Key conclusion: Conclusion Topical amphotericin B cream was both very effective and safe in the treatment nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background Although topical amphotericin B cream is effective for the treatment of nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis in vitro, studies of its effectiveness and safety in vivo are limited. Objectives We studied the effectiveness and safety of topical 0.3% amphotericin B in 30% dimethyl sulfoxide cream (amphotericin B cream) in nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis using the vehicle cream 30% dimethyl sulfoxide cream as control. Methods This randomized controlled study was conducted between January 2019 and November 2020. Patients diagnosed with nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis were randomly divided into two groups of ten patients each: one treated with amphotericin B cream and the other with the vehicle cream. Clinical and mycological cure as well as safety were evaluated. Results Ten patients each treated with amphotericin B cream and the vehicle cream were included in the study, but only nine patients in the vehicle cream group were available for follow up. All the 19 evaluable patients had distal lateral subungual onychomycosis and the great toenails were affected in 18 (94.7%) of these. Mycological cure was achieved in 8 (80%) patients treated with amphotericin B cream and in 4 (44.4%) patients using the control (vehicle) cream. Clinical cure was achieved in 7 (70%) patients treated with amphotericin B cream, but only in 2 (22.2%) patients on the control cream. No adverse events were observed. Limitations The small sample size and the fact that PCR fungal identification that provides accurate identification of fungal species was not performed are limitations of our study. Conclusion Topical amphotericin B cream was both very effective and safe in the treatment nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis. The control (vehicle) cream containing 30% dimethyl sulfoxide also demonstrated some antifungal activity.

05
CLINICAL STUDY The Physician and sportsmedicine (2011) PMID: 22030943 ↗
Dimethyl sulfoxide: an effective penetration enhancer for topical administration of NSAIDs.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2011 Clinical Study published in The Physician and sportsmedicine. Key conclusion: Dimethyl sulfoxide is a safe and effective mechanism for facilitating the transdermal delivery of both hydrophilic and lipophilic medications to provide localized drug delivery.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a molecule with a long history in pharmaceutics and is now well established as a penetration enhancer in topical pharmaceutical formulations. It is currently used for this purpose in diclofenac sodium topical solution (approved in the United States to treat signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis) and idoxuridine topical solution (approved in Europe for the treatment of herpes zoster). This article reviews the mechanism of action of DMSO as a pharmaceutical penetration enhancer, the characteristics of the molecule that facilitate transdermal drug delivery, and studies of efficacy and safety. The clinical use of pharmaceutical-grade DMSO as a penetration enhancer is supported by the robust data that have accumulated over the past 3 decades demonstrating the favorable safety and tolerability profile. Dimethyl sulfoxide is a safe and effective mechanism for facilitating the transdermal delivery of both hydrophilic and lipophilic medications to provide localized drug delivery.

06
CLINICAL STUDY Drug delivery (2009) PMID: 19538004 ↗
Assessment of methylsulfonylmethane as a permeability enhancer for regional EDTA chelation therapy.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2009 Clinical Study published in Drug delivery. Key conclusion: Additionally, these studies suggest that MSM could also be an adjuvant for delivering ciprofloxacin and other chemical compounds to specific, local tissue sites.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Pharmacologic chelators do not effectively penetrate cell membranes and blood-brain barrier. This study assesses methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) as a permeability enhancer and an excipient to facilitate EDTA transport across biologic membranes, and to make possible localized, regional chelation. Topical application of MSM with C(14)EDTA onto the rat cornea led to uptake of the C(14)EDTA in all tested ocular tissues. Without MSM, EDTA did not penetrate the eye. The ability of MSM to deliver EDTA into an eye provides an opportunity for regional chelation therapy. Additionally, these studies suggest that MSM could also be an adjuvant for delivering ciprofloxacin and other chemical compounds to specific, local tissue sites.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Pain (2009) PMID: 19380203 ↗
Efficacy and safety of topical diclofenac containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) compared with those of topical placebo, DMSO vehicle and oral diclofenac for knee osteoarthritis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2009 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Pain involving n = 775 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.015. Key conclusion: Addition of TDiclo to ODiclo did not increase the incidence of systemic adverse events.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

While topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered safe, their long-term efficacy for osteoarthritis has been suspect. We conducted a 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial of topical diclofenac (TDiclo) in a vehicle solution containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in 775 subjects with radiologically confirmed, symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the knee. This 5-arm study compared TDiclo with a placebo solution, the DMSO vehicle, oral diclofenac (ODiclo) and the combination of TDiclo+ODiclo for relieving the signs and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Subjects applied study solution, 40 drops four times daily, and took one study tablet daily for 12 weeks. Co-primary efficacy variables were WOMAC pain and physical function and a patient overall health assessment. Secondary variables were WOMAC stiffness and patient global assessment (PGA) of the knee osteoarthritis. TDiclo was superior to placebo for pain (-6.0 vs. -4.7, P=0.015), physical function (-15.8 vs. -12.3, P=0.034), overall health (-0.95 vs. -0.37, P<0.0001), and PGA (-1.36 vs. -1.01, P=0.016), and was superior to DMSO vehicle for all efficacy variables. No significant difference was observed between DMSO vehicle and placebo or between TDiclo and ODiclo. The commonest adverse event associated with TDiclo was dry skin (18.2%). Fewer digestive system and laboratory abnormalities were observed with TDiclo than with ODiclo. Addition of TDiclo to ODiclo did not increase the incidence of systemic adverse events. TDiclo in DMSO vehicle is an effective treatment option for knee osteoarthritis with efficacy similar to, but tolerability better than ODiclo. DMSO vehicle was no more efficacious than placebo.

08
CLINICAL STUDY Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology (2008) PMID: 17763880 ↗
Effects of diazinon on mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) larvae produced from eggs differentially treated with PCB126.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2008 Clinical Study published in Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology. Key conclusion: This study indicates that the effects of PCB126 and diazinon on body length are cumulative because no significant synergistic or antagonistic interactions were observed.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

During their formation, fish eggs receive a load of contaminants including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from their mother and then, after spawning, are exposed to pesticides present in water. This is the first study investigating the interaction between PCBs and organophosphorous pesticides in fish. The effect of diazinon was evaluated in mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) larvae produced from eggs differentially treated with 3,3',4,4',5 pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB126). A few hours after fertilization, eggs were treated topically with a solution of PCB126 (100 pg/microl) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Group P), DMSO (Group D), or not treated (Group N). Newly hatched larvae from Groups P and D were exposed to diazinon (125-12,900 ng/L) in saltwater and Group N larvae to saltwater alone. Diazinon caused a dose-responsive inhibition of cholinesterase (ChE) activity at environmentally realistic concentrations (> or =361 ng/L), with up to 85% inhibition at 12,900 ng/L. Body length was also inversely related to diazinon at concentrations > or =361 ng/L and was significantly reduced (by 4%) at 12,900 ng/L compared to controls. Mummichog larvae were highly sensitive to PCB126 with an eightfold induction of the activity of ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase at a dose of 710 pg PCB126 or 3.6 pg TCDD-TEQ/g wet weight. Treatment with PCB126 also caused a slight reduction in body length but no effect on ChE activity. This study indicates that the effects of PCB126 and diazinon on body length are cumulative because no significant synergistic or antagonistic interactions were observed. Longer term studies with several doses of PCB126 are needed to fully assess the overall impact of joint exposure to diazinon and PCB126 on growth and survival of fish larvae.

09
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of pharmacology (2007) PMID: 17126828 ↗
Additive interaction of intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine and topical nimesulide, celecoxib, and DFU for antinociception.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2007 Clinical Study published in European journal of pharmacology. Key conclusion: These observations are significant for physicians to combine selective COX-2 inhibitors and dexmedetomidine in the management of pain.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Nimesulide, celecoxib, and DFU (5, 5-dimethyl-3-(3-fluorophenyl)-4-(4-methylsulphonyl)phenyl-2(5H)-furanone) are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 blocking properties and have potent analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities in oral and parenteral administrations. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, is an extremely potent antinociceptive agent. The present study was conducted to evaluate the antinociception induced by nimesulide, celecoxib, and DFU when topically applied on the tail in the absence or presence of intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine. Antinociception was measured in the radiant tail-flick test after immersion of the tail of rat into a solution of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) containing nimesulide, celecoxib, or DFU. Antinociceptive effect of all drugs peaked at 60 min and decreased gradually to baseline levels at 240 min. Nimesulide had a potency lower than those of celecoxib, and DFU. The antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine was blocked by systemic pretreatment of selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, atipamezole. This suggests that antinociceptive effects of dexmedetomidine involve alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. Combination of topical COX-2 inhibitors with intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine yielded additive analgesic effect. These results demonstrate an additive interaction between topical COX-2 inhibitors with intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine. These observations are significant for physicians to combine selective COX-2 inhibitors and dexmedetomidine in the management of pain.

10
CLINICAL STUDY Physics in medicine and biology (2004) PMID: 15012013 ↗
Synergistic effect of hyperosmotic agents of dimethyl sulfoxide and glycerol on optical clearing of gastric tissue studied with near infrared spectroscopy.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2004 Clinical Study published in Physics in medicine and biology. Key conclusion: 80% glycerol leads to 23% increase of light transmittance and 24% decrease of diffuse reflectance.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

In an effort to find an effective concentration that could minimize the side effect for clinical applications, and to understand the potential synergistic effect of hyperosmotic agents on optical clearing of gastric tissues, porcine stomach tissues (pyloric mucosa) applied with a mixed solution of glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) are investigated with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Five chemical solutions, containing 80% glycerol, 50% DMSO, 50% glycerol with 10% DMSO, 20% DMSO and 30% DMSO, respectively, are prepared and studied; all of which show significant improvement in light transmittance, and thus reduction of the light scattering of tissue. It is found that, among the solutions investigated, 50% glycerol with 30% DMSO achieves the best clearing effect on the improvement of light penetration. Light transmittance is increased approximately 29% and diffuse reflectance decreased approximately 31% at 30 min after the topical application of 50% glycerol with 30% DMSO. This solution shows significantly stronger effect than 80% glycerol on optical clearing even though they have the same osmolarity. 80% glycerol leads to 23% increase of light transmittance and 24% decrease of diffuse reflectance. The mixed solution of 50% glycerol and 20% DMSO has less osmolarity than the solution of 80% glycerol, but they achieve a similar degree of optical clearing. In other words, the clearing effect of glycerol is enhanced by adding DMSO into it. It is suggested that membrane penetration and carrier effect of DMSO probably accounts for this synergistic effect.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category