NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

Echinacea

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Echinacea is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 29 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (7 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 5,732 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 29 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 7 Meta · 2 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 4 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 5,732
Reported Trial Dosages 200 mg · 20 mg · 40 mg
Trial Duration Range 6 days · 4 days · 60 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 29 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (200 mg · 20 mg · 40 mg) over a structured 6 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (29 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (14 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (4 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (7 meta-analyses · 2 reviews)
01

What Is Echinacea & Why Does Form Matter?

Echinacea is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 29 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (200 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Echinacea frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (4 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Echinacea acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Echinacea an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 29 PubMed studies: 7 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 5,732 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40311928 (2025) — "Efficacy and safety of Echinacea purpurea in treating upper respiratory infections and complications of otitis media in children: Systematic review and meta-analysis." (purpurea was effective in reducing the duration of treat) • PMID:38999738 (2024) — "Echinacea Supplementation Does Not Impact Aerobic Capacity and Erythropoiesis in Athletes: A Meta-Analysis." (There was also no statistically significant change in erythropoietin (effect size -0.29, p = 0.05, 95% CI -0.75-0.17, I2 = 67%) or maximal oxygen uptake (effect size -0.20, p = 0.95, 95% CI -0.60-0.21, I2 = 0%).) • PMID:33809656 (2021) — "Efficacy of Functional Foods, Beverages, and Supplements Claiming to Alleviate Air Travel Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." (Pycnogenol also reduced edema scores (n = 3), standard mean -4.09 (95% CI = -6.44 to -1.74), I2 98%, p = 0.0006).)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)RR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 403119280.81PMID 311265530.78 (0.68–0.88)0.2Null (1)5Metric: RR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 200 mg · 20 mg · 40 mg · 80 mg over 6 days · 4 days · 60 days · 5 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MODERATE] Concomitant Prescription Medication: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:17887936). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (200 mg · 20 mg · 40 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 6 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Concomitant Prescription Medication.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (29 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2025) PMID: 40311928 ↗
Efficacy and safety of Echinacea purpurea in treating upper respiratory infections and complications of otitis media in children: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 1,518 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01 (RR 0.81). Key conclusion: purpurea was effective in reducing the duration of treat
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Echinacea purpurea is widely utilized in dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, and herbal medicine, yet its effectiveness and safety for children remain debated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of E. purpurea in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and otitis media (OM) in children. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed from January 2000 to December 2023. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted and reported according to the PRISMA 2020 Checklist and Cochrane Training 2022 guidelines. RESULTS: 9 randomized controlled trials with 1518 participants in the treatment group, 1651 participants in the placebo control group, met the selection criteria. Products derived from E. purpurea are highly diverse, utilizing different plant parts such as roots, leaves, and flowers, available in various dosage forms like capsules and extracts, and manufactured in numerous countries worldwide. Risk of bias was assessed according to the PEDro scale with 3 studies of excellent quality, 5 studies of high quality and 1 study of moderate quality. The meta-analysis found that E. purpurea significantly benefits URTI, reducing treatment duration (SMD = -0.19, 95 % CI [-0.30; -0.09], p < 0.01), incidence (RR = 0.81, 95 % CI [0.75; 0.87]), and antibiotic use (RR = 0.18, 95 % CI [0.13; 0.25], p < 0.01). However, adverse events were moderately increased (RR = 1.38, 95 % CI [1.08; 1.78]), though generally mild. For OM, E. purpurea lowered episode incidence (RR = 0.56, 95 % CI [0.44; 0.73], p < 0.01) but did not shorten treatment duration (p = 0.10). Its effectiveness may be limited due to OM's bacterial etiology, often requiring antibiotics. While E. purpurea may help reduce recurrence, it is unlikely to speed recovery. Further research on optimal formulations and dosages is needed. The publication bias of pooled results as assessed by the funnel plot showed that the studies had certain bias, largely due to heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis of nine studies found that E. purpurea was effective in reducing the duration of treat

02
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2024) PMID: 38999738 ↗
Echinacea Supplementation Does Not Impact Aerobic Capacity and Erythropoiesis in Athletes: A Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.02. Key conclusion: There was also no statistically significant change in erythropoietin (effect size -0.29, p = 0.05, 95% CI -0.75-0.17, I2 = 67%) or maximal oxygen uptake (effect size -0.20, p = 0.95, 95% CI -0.60-0.21, I2 = 0%).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Athletes are increasingly relying on natural supplements to improve athletic performance. Echinacea, a common herbal supplement, has been studied for its potential erythropoietin-enhancing effects, with mixed results in the literature. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether echinacea supplementation has erythropoietic or ergogenic effects in athletes. A search strategy was developed to identify trials studying the impact of echinacea supplementation on erythropoiesis and maximal oxygen uptake. The database search yielded 502 studies, 496 of which were excluded in the two-reviewer screening process. Six studies with a total of 107 athletes were included in the analysis. For hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, there were small, positive effect sizes when comparing the difference in pre- and post-intervention levels between the echinacea and placebo groups, at 0.38 (p = 0.02, 95% CI -0.04-0.80, I2 = 70%) and 0.34 (p < 0.01, 95% CI -0.10-0.78, I2 = 86%), respectively, though they did not reach statistical significance. There was also no statistically significant change in erythropoietin (effect size -0.29, p = 0.05, 95% CI -0.75-0.17, I2 = 67%) or maximal oxygen uptake (effect size -0.20, p = 0.95, 95% CI -0.60-0.21, I2 = 0%). Echinacea supplementation did not influence erythropoietin, hemoglobin, hematocrit, or maximal oxygen uptake in athletes; however, the evidence base is limited.

03
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2021) PMID: 33809656 ↗
Efficacy of Functional Foods, Beverages, and Supplements Claiming to Alleviate Air Travel Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 10 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (MD -0.76). Key conclusion: Pycnogenol also reduced edema scores (n = 3), standard mean -4.09 (95% CI = -6.44 to -1.74), I2 98%, p = 0.0006).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Airline passengers experience a range of symptoms when travelling on long flights. This review evaluated the efficacy of functional foods, beverages, and supplements claiming to address the effects of air travel for healthy adults. Products were identified in a scoping review of electronic databases, search engines, and grey literature (March to August 2019). A systematic review of the efficacy of product ingredients was conducted using five electronic databases from inception to February 2021. Articles were screened, data extracted, and assessed for risk of bias by two researchers independently. Meta-analysis was performed. Of the 3842 studies identified, 23 met selection criteria: melatonin (n = 10), Pycnogenol (n = 4), various macronutrients (n = 2), caffeine (n = 2), Centella asiatica (n = 1), elderberry (n = 1), Echinacea (n = 1), fluid (n = 1), and Pinokinase (n = 1). Meta-analysis (random effects model) indicated melatonin reduced self-reported jetlag following eastbound (n = 5) and westbound (n = 4) flights: standard mean difference -0.76 (95% CI = -1.06 to -0.45, I2 0%, p < 0.00001) and -0.66 (95% CI = -1.07 to -0.26, I2 45%, p = 0.001), respectively. Pycnogenol also reduced edema scores (n = 3), standard mean -4.09 (95% CI = -6.44 to -1.74), I2 98%, p = 0.0006). Overall, 12 of 183 ingredients contained in 199 products had evidence to support claims.

04
META-ANALYSIS European journal of clinical pharmacology (2019) PMID: 30465062 ↗
Efficacy of vitamin C for the prevention and treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. A meta-analysis in children.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of clinical pharmacology involving n = 3,135 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.07 (OR 0.75). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Although no preventive effects were found, vitamin C intake reduced the duration of URTI.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a common infection in children, generally caused by viral respiratory infection. Vitamin C is currently proposed as prophylaxis for URTI. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of vitamin C administration in children for the prevention and reduced duration of URTI through a systematic literature review. METHODS: Review of the literature conducted between October 2017 and January 2018 in the main medical databases (CENTRAL, Medline and Embase) and by a gray literature approach. The selection criteria were: double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vitamin C use to placebo in children aged 3 months to 18 years without chronic infection. Efficacy was assessed in terms of incidence, duration and severity of symptoms of URTI. A meta-analysis was conducted where possible. RESULTS: Eight RCTs, including 3135 children aged 3 months to 18 years, were selected. Quantitative analysis showed no difference between vitamin C administration and placebo (odds ratio = 0.75, 95% CI [0.54-1.03], p = 0.07, I2 = 74%). Vitamin C administration was found to decrease the duration of URTI by 1.6 days (standardized mean differences = -0.30 [-0.53; -0.08], p = 0.009, I2 = 70%). Children under 6 years of age benefit from more effective vitamin C supplementation associated with echinacea. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although no preventive effects were found, vitamin C intake reduced the duration of URTI. Considering the frequency of URTI, the inappropriate prescription of antibiotics, and the safe nature of vitamin C, its supplementation is justified, especially in children under 6 years of age and those who present a high frequency of URTI. There is a sound rationale for further trials with greater statistical power among children of this age.

05
CLINICAL STUDY Phytotherapy research (2016) PMID: 26887532 ↗
A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Systematic Review published in Phytotherapy research. Key conclusion: However, firm conclusions of efficacy cannot be generally drawn.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses represent the uppermost ladders in the hierarchy of evidence. Systematic reviews/meta-analyses suggest preliminary or satisfactory clinical evidence for agnus castus (Vitex agnus castus) for premenstrual complaints, flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum) for hypertension, feverfew (Tanacetum partenium) for migraine prevention, ginger (Zingiber officinalis) for pregnancy-induced nausea, ginseng (Panax ginseng) for improving fasting glucose levels as well as phytoestrogens and St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) for the relief of some symptoms in menopause. However, firm conclusions of efficacy cannot be generally drawn. On the other hand, inconclusive evidence of efficacy or contradictory results have been reported for Aloe vera in the treatment of psoriasis, cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) in cystitis prevention, ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) for tinnitus and intermittent claudication, echinacea (Echinacea spp.) for the prevention of common cold and pomegranate (Punica granatum) for the prevention/treatment of cardiovascular diseases. A critical evaluation of the clinical data regarding the adverse effects has shown that herbal remedies are generally better tolerated than synthetic medications. Nevertheless, potentially serious adverse events, including herb-drug interactions, have been described. This suggests the need to be vigilant when using herbal remedies, particularly in specific conditions, such as during pregnancy and in the paediatric population. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

06
META-ANALYSIS The Lancet. Infectious diseases (2007) PMID: 17597571 ↗
Evaluation of echinacea for the prevention and treatment of the common cold: a meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2007 Meta-Analysis published in The Lancet. Infectious diseases; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (OR 0.42). Key conclusion: Published evidence supports echinacea's benefit in decreasing the incidence and duration of the common cold.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Erratum in Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;7(9):580. Comment in Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Jun;8(6):346-7; author reply 347-8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70107-5. Echinacea is one of the most commonly used herbal products, but controversy exists about its benefit in the prevention and treatment of the common cold. Thus, we did a meta-analysis evaluating the effect of echinacea on the incidence and duration of the common cold. 14 unique studies were included in the meta-analysis. Incidence of the common cold was reported as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI, and duration of the common cold was reported as the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. Weighted averages and mean differences were calculated by a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird methodology). Heterogeneity was assessed by the Q statistic and review of L'Abbé plots, and publication bias was assessed through the Egger weighted regression statistic and visual inspection of funnel plots. Echinacea decreased the odds of developing the common cold by 58% (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25-0.71; Q statistic p<0.001) and the duration of a cold by 1.4 days (WMD -1.44, -2.24 to -0.64; p=0.01). Similarly, significant reductions were maintained in subgroup analyses limited to Echinaguard/Echinacin use, concomitant supplement use, method of cold exposure, Jadad scores less than 3, or use of a fixed-effects model. Published evidence supports echinacea's benefit in decreasing the incidence and duration of the common cold.

07
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of molecular sciences (2024) PMID: 39769201 ↗
Therapeutic Potential of a Natural Blend of Aronia melancarpa, Lonicera caerulea, and Echinacea purpurea Extracts in Treating Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: Preliminary Clinical and In Vitro Immunomodulatory Insights.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in International journal of molecular sciences involving n = 61 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.044. Key conclusion: The blend suppressed VSV replication and significantly increased cytokine levels, with IFN-γ increasing by 98 pg/mL (p = 0.002), IL-1β rising by 233.0 pg/mL (p = 0.004), and TNF-α showing an increase of 2905 pg/mL (p = 0.002).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are a prevalent health issue, causing considerable morbidity. Despite the availability of conventional treatments, there is an increasing interest in natural products due to their potential antiviral and immunomodulatory benefits. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an ELA blend (E-Echinacea purpurea, L-Lonicera cerulea, A-Aronia melanocarpa) in preventing and alleviating the symptoms of URTIs. Additionally, the study examines the blend's antiviral and immunomodulatory effects both in vitro and through a clinical trial. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved 61 participants prone to URTIs, with a 60-day treatment and follow-up period. A placebo group later received the ELA blend for 60 days. The ELA blend significantly reduced the incidence of URTIs during the observation period (2 vs. 8; p = 0.044) and, in particular, throat-related symptoms (8 vs. 16; p = 0.038). Analyses of PBMCs showed that baseline production of the cytokines IFN-γ (p = 0.020), IL-1β (p = 0.004), IL-2(p < 0.001), IL-6 (p < 0.001), and TNF-α (p < 0.001) increased after ELA blend treatment. Moreover, the ELA blend modulated cytokine production in response to PHA-L stimulation, decreasing IFN-γ (p = 0.008) and IL-2 (p = 0.012) while increasing IL-1β (p = 0.005). Following R848 stimulation, the ELA blend enhanced the production of INF-α (p = 0.012) and IL-2 (p = 0.025), and decreased IL-1β (p < 0.001), IL-6 (p < 0.001), and TNF-α (p = 0.049). The blend suppressed VSV replication and significantly increased cytokine levels, with IFN-γ increasing by 98 pg/mL (p = 0.002), IL-1β rising by 233.0 pg/mL (p = 0.004), and TNF-α showing an increase of 2905 pg/mL (p = 0.002). These findings highlight the ELA blend's potential to alleviate URTI symptoms, modulate inflammatory and antiviral immune responses, and inhibit viral replication. Further investigations should aim to validate these findings through large-scale studies, and explore the ELA blend's long-term safety and efficacy in diverse populations. Additionally, research should investigate optimal dosing strategies and explore potential synergistic effects with conventional t

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Virology journal (2024) PMID: 39702335 ↗
Investigating the effect of echinacea extraction syrup on the outcomes of lower respiratory infections in patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Virology journal involving n = 20 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: In addition, there were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups in terms of the mean oxygen saturation, temperature, and number of breaths per minute on the first, third, and fifth day (p > 0.05).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Many COVID-19 patients experience mild to severe symptoms, including respiratory system involvement. Different treatment instructions have been suggested for patients with COVID-19. Echinacea has known antiviral effects. However, there is still not enough evidence that it is effective in treating COVID-19. This study was conducted with the aim of determining the effect of Echinacea extract syrup on the outcomes of the lower respiratory tract in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 40 patients with COVID-19 who were inpatients in the hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran, were randomly selected and assigned to two equal control and experimental groups (n = 20). In addition to receiving routine care and treatment (oxygen supply, remdesivir, enoxaparin and heparin), the experimental group received 5 cubic centimeter (CC) of Imogen syrup three times a day for 5 days each. The control group only received routine care and treatment. The data were collected on the first, third and fifth days after hospitalization and were analyzed using descriptive and analytical tests in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean white blood cell count in the experimental group after the intervention decreased significantly compared to that before the intervention (t = 0.434, p = 0.045, df = 19). Arterial oxygen pressure increased significantly in both the experimental group (t = 4.382, p = 0.000, df = 19) and control group (t = 3.239, p = 0.004, df = 19), however no statistical differences were observed between experimental and control groups after intervention. The level of lung involvement (p = 0.320) and cough symptoms (P = 0.347) were not significantly different between the experimental and control groups after the intervention. In addition, there were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups in terms of the mean oxygen saturation, temperature, and number of breaths per minute on the first, third, and fifth day (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The consumption of Echinacea extract syrup may not be able to improv

09
CLINICAL STUDY Biomolecules (2024) PMID: 39334942 ↗
Effects of Plant Meristem-Cell-Based Cosmetics on Menopausal Skin: Clinical Data and Mechanisms.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Biomolecules. Key conclusion: Data showed that the cosmetics were safe, and they shifted the skin physiology parameters to a younger biological age, enhanced collagen synthesis, inhibited lipid peroxidation, and favoured normal microbiota.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

A randomised open clinical/laboratory study was performed to evaluate the safety and cosmetic efficacy of facial cosmetics for females during the menopausal period. The cosmetics contain active ingredients of meristem cells derived from the medicinal plants Leontopodium alpinum, Buddeleja davidii, Centella asiatica, and Echinacea angustifolia. Recently, the major bioactive molecules of these medicinal plants (leontopodic acid, verbascoside, asiaticoside, and echinacoside, respectively) have been thoroughly evaluated in vitro for molecular pathways and cellular mechanisms and their preventive/curative effects on human skin cells exposed to factors promoting premature skin ageing and cellular senescence. Nevertheless, clinical data on their safety/efficacy to ageing human skin are scarce. This clinical study enrolled 104 Caucasian females in pre-menopause, menopause, or post-menopause periods. They applied cosmetic serums daily for 1 month. Questionnaires and instrumental and biochemical methods were used to assess dermatological/ophthalmological safety and cosmetic efficacy through changes of the skin physiology markers characteristic of ageing/menopause (elasticity, barrier functions, moisture, sebum, ultrasonic properties, and collagen content and structure). Quantitative microbiological tests were carried out for skin microbiota fluctuations. Data showed that the cosmetics were safe, and they shifted the skin physiology parameters to a younger biological age, enhanced collagen synthesis, inhibited lipid peroxidation, and favoured normal microbiota.

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Phytotherapy research (2024) PMID: 38743584 ↗
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on immune improvement effects of ethanolic extract of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench in Korean adults.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Phytotherapy research. Key conclusion: These results indicate that consumption of EPE could lead to immune improvement without any adverse effects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (EP), a medicinal plant native to North America, is now cultivated in various regions including Europe. With increasing popularity of Echinacea in Korea recently, a human clinical trial was conducted to evaluate immune-enhancing efficacy and safety of EP 60% ethanolic extract (EPE) in Koreans. Eighty volunteers were recruited for this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. They were randomly divided into two groups and given either a daily dose of 200 mg of EPE or a placebo. All participants underwent testing for Natural Killer (NK) cell cytotoxic activity, serum cytokine levels (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α), Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey-21 (WURSS-21), and Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS) during this study to assess changes in outcomes. After 8 weeks of EPE consumption, a significant increase in NK cell cytotoxic activity compared to the placebo was observed. Additionally, serum cytokine levels of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α also significantly increased following EPE consumption. However, no significant changes were observed in WURSS-21 and MFS before and after EPE consumption. Throughout the 8-week study period, no adverse reactions were reported in relation to EPE consumption, and there were no clinically significant changes in diagnostic laboratory tests or vital signs in the EPE group. These results indicate that consumption of EPE could lead to immune improvement without any adverse effects. This clinical trial was the first to demonstrate beneficial effects of EPE consumption on immunity in Korean adults. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category