NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

Garcinia Cambogia

WEIGHT METABOLISM · Evidence Monograph

Garcinia Cambogia is an evidence-graded weight metabolism monograph evaluated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (6 meta-analyses, 4 systematic reviews, and 3 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 1,960 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 18 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 6 Meta · 4 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 3 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 1,960
Reported Trial Dosages 8 mg · 500 mg · 750 mg
Trial Duration Range 8 weeks · 12 weeks · 14 days
Reading Time ~9 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 18 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (8 mg · 500 mg · 750 mg) over a structured 8 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary weight metabolism clinical efficacy (18 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (7 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (3 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (6 meta-analyses · 4 reviews)
01

What Is Garcinia Cambogia & Why Does Form Matter?

Garcinia Cambogia is classified under WEIGHT METABOLISM and has been investigated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (8 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Garcinia Cambogia frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (3 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Garcinia Cambogia acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Garcinia Cambogia an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 18 PubMed studies: 6 meta-analyses, 4 systematic reviews, and 3 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 1,960 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39943939 (2025) — "The effects of Garcinia cambogia on glycaemic control and liver enzymes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials." (This meta-analysis showed that supplementation with Garcinia cambogia has no significant effect on FBS, insulin, ALT, or AST levels compared with control groups; however, it seems that increasing the duration of the intervention may have a decreasing effect on insulin levels.) • PMID:32951714 (2020) — "Effect of Garcinia cambogia supplement on obesity indices: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that Garcinia cambogia supplement had a significant effect on the body weight, BMI, PFA, and WC as compared with the placebo.) • PMID:40209997 (2025) — "Evaluation of the Therapeutic Potential of Garcinia cambogia Alone or in Combination With Silodosin in the Management of LUTS/BPH: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study." (CONCLUSION: Treatment with Garcinia extract, especially in combination with Silodosin, may improve the Qmax, IPSS, PVR, PV, and PSA in patients with LUTS/BPH without any clinical significant adverse effects.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 38876392-5.01 (-9.22–-0.8)PMID 38151892-6.76-11Null (0)1.4Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 8 mg · 500 mg · 750 mg · 2 g over 8 weeks · 12 weeks · 14 days · 1 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Garcinia Cambogia, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (8 mg · 500 mg · 750 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 8 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (18 Studies) · 7 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Journal of nutritional science (2025) PMID: 39943939 ↗
The effects of Garcinia cambogia on glycaemic control and liver enzymes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of nutritional science involving n = 444 participants (SMD -0.08). Key conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that supplementation with Garcinia cambogia has no significant effect on FBS, insulin, ALT, or AST levels compared with control groups; however, it seems that increasing the duration of the intervention may have a decreasing effect on insulin levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Previous studies have assessed how supplementing with Garcinia cambogia affects glycaemic control and liver enzyme levels; nevertheless, the results were not consistent. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of Garcinia cambogia on glycaemic control and liver enzymes through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Searches were conducted from the beginning through February 2023, using online databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library). Trials examining the impact of Garcinia cambogia on serum levels of fasting blood sugar (FBS), serum level of insulin, alanine transaminase (ALT), and aspartate transaminase (AST) in adults were included. The overall estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. This meta-analysis includes nine publications with 444 participants. The results showed that Garcinia cambogia has no significant effect on FBS (weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.02 mg/dl, 95% CI: -1.29, 3.33), insulin (WMD: -0.12 mU/L, 95% CI: -1.50, 1.25), AST (Hedges' g: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.43, 0.26), and ALT (Hedges' g: 0.27, 95% CI: -0.20, 0.73). Subgroup analysis showed that Garcinia cambogia significantly increased insulin levels in females and also increased insulin and FBS levels in those with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Nevertheless, the administration of Garcinia cambogia for more than 8 weeks significantly decreased insulin levels. This meta-analysis showed that supplementation with Garcinia cambogia has no significant effect on FBS, insulin, ALT, or AST levels compared with control groups; however, it seems that increasing the duration of the intervention may have a decreasing effect on insulin levels. © The Author(s) 2025.

02
META-ANALYSIS Complementary therapies in medicine (2020) PMID: 32951714 ↗
Effect of Garcinia cambogia supplement on obesity indices: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Complementary therapies in medicine involving n = 530 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that Garcinia cambogia supplement had a significant effect on the body weight, BMI, PFA, and WC as compared with the placebo.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Several trials have examined the effect of Garcinia cambogia supplement on the weight and body composition, but their results are conflicting. This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis was designed to determine the effect of Garcinia cambogia supplement on the obesity indices in human randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 1th January, 2020, to screen relevant trials. The mean changes in the weight, body mass index (BMI), percentage of fat mass (PFM), and waist circumference (WC) from the baseline were used to conduct the present dose response meta-analysis. RESULTS: In the current study, eight trials (including 530 subjects) were included. Garcinia cambogia supplement significantly reduced the weight by -1.34 kg (95% CI: -2.62 to -0.07, P = 0.03), BMI by -0.99 kg/m2 (95% CI: -1.48 to -0.49, P < 0.001), PFM by -0.42% (95% CI: -0.77 to -0.06, P = 0.02), and WC by -4.16 cm (95% CI: -7.83 to -0.49, P = 0.02) compared with the placebo group. Dose-response analysis revealed that there is a nonlinear association between Garcinia cambogia dosage and changes in the body weight (Pnonlinearity = 0.04) and BMI (Pnonlinearity < 0.001) not PFM (Pnonlinearity = 0.68). There was no publication bias among the studies. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that Garcinia cambogia supplement had a significant effect on the body weight, BMI, PFA, and WC as compared with the placebo.

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Urology (2025) PMID: 40209997 ↗
Evaluation of the Therapeutic Potential of Garcinia cambogia Alone or in Combination With Silodosin in the Management of LUTS/BPH: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Urology involving n = 33 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Treatment with Garcinia extract, especially in combination with Silodosin, may improve the Qmax, IPSS, PVR, PV, and PSA in patients with LUTS/BPH without any clinical significant adverse effects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Garcinia cambogia (hydroxy citric acid) alone or in combination with Silodosin on the clinical outcomes of lower urinary tract symptoms/Benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study conducted on patients with LUTS/BPH. Eligible patients were assigned randomly to one of three groups. Group A (33 patients) received Silodosin, 8 mg, once daily. Group B (35 patients) received Garcinia extract 500 mg TID. Group C (36 patients) received the combination of Silodosin, plus Garcinia extract. All participants were assessed for the changes in; the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Post-Void Residual (PVR), prostate volume (PV), and serum Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) levels, at the baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The baseline data regarding Qmax, IPSS, PVR, PV, and PSA showed non-significant differences between the three groups. After 12 weeks of treatment, all groups showed a significant improvement in both Qmax and IPSS (P >.001) and group C showed the best improvement. The PVR was significantly reduced in all groups (P >.001). The PV was significantly increased in group A (P = .006), whereas it was significantly reduced in groups B and C (P >.001). The PSA showed a non-significant increase in group A (P = .625), while it was significantly decreased in groups B and C (P >.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with Garcinia extract, especially in combination with Silodosin, may improve the Qmax, IPSS, PVR, PV, and PSA in patients with LUTS/BPH without any clinical significant adverse effects.

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Food & function (2022) PMID: 35416190 ↗
The effect of hydroxy citric acid supplementation with calorie-restricted diet on metabolic, atherogenic and inflammatory biomarkers in women with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Food & function; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Our results indicated that HCA supplementation plus calorie-restricted diet could improve some metabolic factors without any significant effect on inflammation in patients with NAFLD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The objective of the present study was to examine the effects of hydroxy citric acid (HCA) extracts from Garcinia cambogia on metabolic, atherogenic and inflammatory biomarkers in obese women with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The present clinical trial was carried out on 40 overweight/obese women with NAFLD. The patients were randomly allocated into either the "HCA group" (receiving calorie-restricted diet (-700 kcal d-1) accompanied by HCA tablets) and the "control group" (receiving only calorie-restricted diet) for eight weeks. Weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC) were measured. Fasting blood sugar (FBS), lipid profile, liver enzymes, as well as inflammatory biomarkers were determined at baseline and after the intervention. Dietary intake was assessed at baseline and at the end of the trial and food intake data were analyzed by the Nutritionist IV software. Results showed a decrease in energy and macronutrient intake in both groups (p < 0.05). Weight, BMI, WC, and hip circumference as well as FBS, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increased significantly in the HCA group (p < 0.05). There were also significant reductions in WC, FBS, TG, total cholesterol, LDL-C in the control group while inter-group changes in FBS, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C were statistically significant. Although atherogenic indices reduced significantly in both groups, inter-group comparison revealed that the HCA group showed greater decrease in the TG/HDL-C ratio than the control group (p = 0.004). Other atherogenic indices including TC/HDL-C and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio showed greater reduction in the control versus HCA group (p < 0.01). Some inflammatory factors were reduced in the HCA group; however, no significant within- or between-group differences were revealed post-intervention. Our results indicated that HCA supplementation plus calorie-restricted diet could improve some metabolic factors without any significant effect on inflammation in patients with NAFLD.

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of pharmaceutical sciences (2021) PMID: 33164784 ↗
Food-Effect on (-) - Hydroxycitric Acid Absorption After Oral Administration of Garcinia cambogia Extract Formulation: a Phase I, Randomized, Cross-Over Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: Plasma HCA concentrations were substantially reduced in fed-state.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Garcinia cambogia extract (GCE)/(-) - hydroxycitric acid (HCA) has been identified as a potential antiobesity agent. However, controversial clinical trial results have been published on its biological effect and poor pharmacokinetic (PK) information increases its dubious efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the main PK parameters of GCE/HCA in healthy women, and to evaluate food effects on HCA absorption. Healthy women ages 21-41 years with body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) 20.29-25.82 participated in a phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose, cross-over study. In the fasted- and fed-conditions subjects received 1500/750 mg of GCE/HCA under 8 h of fasting. In the fed-period was given a high calorie breakfast (~600 calories) after dosing. Plasma HCA concentrations were substantially reduced in fed-state. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve of time-concentration (AUC0-10h) were 3-fold and 2-fold lower (p < 0.001, 0.01) in fed-condition, respectively. Higher volume of distribution (Vd/F) and clearance (Cl/F) were achieved in fed state, probably due to the lower fraction (F) of HCA absorbed induced by food effect. Large inter-individual variations were observed for the main pharmacokinetics parameters in both periods. These findings suggest that HCA might suffer an active absorption uptake and intense adsorption on food.

06
CLINICAL STUDY Food and chemical toxicology (2019) PMID: 30940594 ↗
Short-term effects of Garcinia cambogia extract on the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine given as a single-dose in Wistar rats.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Clinical Study published in Food and chemical toxicology. Key conclusion: In the 14-day pre-treatment study, a statistically significant decrease in the rate of systemic exposure to LTG and an increase of apparent volume of distribution were found.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Garcinia cambogia supplements are widely used for weight loss. Knowing that epilepsy patients are at greater risk of developing overweight/obesity, the investigation of herb-drug interactions involving antiepileptic drugs of narrow therapeutic index is fully justified. This work was planned to assess potential pharmacokinetic-based interactions between G. cambogia extract and lamotrigine (LTG) through two independent pharmacokinetic studies. In the first study (co-administration study), rats were orally co-administered with a single-dose of G. cambogia extract (821 mg/kg) and LTG (10 mg/kg). In the second study (pre-treatment study), rats were orally pre-treated for 14 days with G. cambogia extract (821 mg/kg/day), being LTG administered (10 mg/kg) on the 15th day. Rats of the control groups received water instead of the extract. Following LTG administration, blood samples were collected until 96 h post-dose, and plasma LTG concentrations were determined and submitted to a non-compartmental analysis. Globally, no statistically significant effects were identified in the co-administration study of G. cambogia extract and LTG. In the 14-day pre-treatment study, a statistically significant decrease in the rate of systemic exposure to LTG and an increase of apparent volume of distribution were found. Even so, a minor or no clinical impact is expected from the administration of G. cambogia dietary supplements and LTG.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of integrative medicine (2019) PMID: 30738773 ↗
Evidence for the efficacy and safety of herbal weight loss preparations.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Clinical Study published in Journal of integrative medicine. Key conclusion: Rising rates of obesity across the globe have been associated with an increase in the use of herbal preparations for weight control.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Rising rates of obesity across the globe have been associated with an increase in the use of herbal preparations for weight control. However, the mechanisms of action for these substances are often not known, as is the potential for interaction with other herbal preparations or prescription pharmaceutical drugs. To investigate the reported efficacy and safety of herbal weight loss preparations, we conducted a review of the literature focusing on herbs that are most commonly used in weight loss preparations, specifically, Garcinia cambogia, Camellia sinensis, Hoodia gordonii, Citrus aurantium and Coleus forskohlii. There was no clear evidence that the above herbal preparations would cause sustained long-term weight loss in humans in the long term. Serious illness and even death have occasionally resulted from the use of herbal weight loss preparations. Few clinical trials have been undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and/or safety of herbal weight loss preparations. In addition, potential issues of herb-herb and herb-drug interactions are often not considered. Regulation of these products is much less rigorous than for prescription medications, despite documented cases of associated hepatotoxicity.

08
CLINICAL STUDY The Medical journal of Australia (2017) PMID: 28152355 ↗
What risks do herbal products pose to the Australian community?
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Clinical Study published in The Medical journal of Australia. Key conclusion: We need to raise awareness of these problems with health care practitioners and with the general public.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Comment in Med J Aust. 2017 Aug 7;207(3):134. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00153. Med J Aust. 2017 Aug 7;207(3):134. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00195. Med J Aust. 2017 Aug 7;207(3):134. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00163. Traditional herbal products are widely used in Australia to treat a broad range of conditions and diseases. It is popularly believed that these products are safer than prescribed drugs. While many may be safe, it is worrying that the specific effects and harmful interactions of a number of their components with prescription medications is not well understood. Some traditional herbal preparations contain heavy metals and toxic chemicals, as well as naturally occurring organic toxins. The effects of these substances can be dire, including acute hepatic and renal failure, exacerbation of pre-existing conditions and diseases, and even death. The content and quality of herbal preparations are not tightly controlled, with some ingredients either not listed or their concentrations recorded inaccurately on websites or labels. Herbal products may also include illegal ingredients, such as ephedra, Asarum europaeum (European wild ginger) and endangered animal species (eg, snow leopard). An additional problem is augmentation with prescription medications to enhance the apparent effectiveness of a preparation. Toxic substances may also be deliberately or inadvertently added: less expensive, more harmful plants may be substituted for more expensive ingredients, and processing may not be adequate. The lack of regulation and monitoring of traditional herbal preparations in Australia and other Western countries means that their contribution to illness and death is unknown. We need to raise awareness of these problems with health care practitioners and with the general public.

09
CLINICAL STUDY Digestive and liver disease (2007) PMID: 17157086 ↗
Fatal liver failure following food supplements during chronic treatment with montelukast.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2007 Clinical Study published in Digestive and liver disease. Key conclusion: Despite the speculative nature of this presentation, we believe the warning may serve to focus attention on the uncontrolled escalation of food additives going on in these days.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

High aminotransferases and prolonged prothrombin time on entering our liver unit were revealing parenchymal collapse for this 45-year-old obese woman; treatment failure led her to death. Autoimmunity, paracetamol use, alcoholism, and Wilson's disease were all excluded as causes. Because of chronic asthma, she had been receiving a leukotriene receptor antagonist (montelukast) for 5 years before the current presentation; 1 week before onset she had had 1 week of treatment with two dietary supplements for weight control; one of these included Garcinia Cambogia, a possible cause of two recent cases of hepatitis in the USA; in addition, both formulas contained a citrus derivative that interferes cytochrome functions. We speculate on a causal relationship between the assumption of the additives and the fatal hepatitis and envisage a synergy between the additives and montelukast, which per se has well been studied as a hepatotoxic drug. Despite the speculative nature of this presentation, we believe the warning may serve to focus attention on the uncontrolled escalation of food additives going on in these days.

10
CLINICAL STUDY The British journal of nutrition (2012) PMID: 21824444 ↗
Oral hydroxycitrate supplementation enhances glycogen synthesis in exercised human skeletal muscle.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2012 Clinical Study published in The British journal of nutrition. Key conclusion: The present study reports the first evidence that HCA supplementation enhanced glycogen synthesis rate in exercised human skeletal muscle and improved post-meal insulin sensitivity.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Glycogen stored in skeletal muscle is the main fuel for endurance exercise. The present study examined the effects of oral hydroxycitrate (HCA) supplementation on post-meal glycogen synthesis in exercised human skeletal muscle. Eight healthy male volunteers (aged 22·0 (se 0·3) years) completed a 60-min cycling exercise at 70-75 % VO₂max and received HCA or placebo in a crossover design repeated after a 7 d washout period. They consumed 500 mg HCA or placebo with a high-carbohydrate meal (2 g carbohydrate/kg body weight, 80 % carbohydrate, 8 % fat, 12 % protein) for a 3-h post-exercise recovery. Muscle biopsy samples were obtained from vastus lateralis immediately and 3 h after the exercise. We found that HCA supplementation significantly lowered post-meal insulin response with similar glucose level compared to placebo. The rate of glycogen synthesis with the HCA meal was approximately onefold higher than that with the placebo meal. In contrast, GLUT4 protein level after HCA supplementation was significantly decreased below the placebo level, whereas expression of fatty acid translocase (FAT)/CD36 mRNA was significantly increased above the placebo level. Furthermore, HCA supplementation significantly increased energy reliance on fat oxidation, estimated by the gaseous exchange method. However, no differences were found in circulating NEFA and glycerol levels with the HCA meal compared with the placebo meal. The present study reports the first evidence that HCA supplementation enhanced glycogen synthesis rate in exercised human skeletal muscle and improved post-meal insulin sensitivity.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category