NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Glucomannan

WEIGHT METABOLISM · Evidence Monograph

Glucomannan is an evidence-graded weight metabolism monograph evaluated across 29 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 7,830 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 29 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 2 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 4 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 7,830
Reported Trial Dosages 3 g · 50 g · 4 g
Trial Duration Range 8 weeks · 12 weeks · 16 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 29 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (3 g · 50 g · 4 g) over a structured 8 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
weight (PubMed clinical endpoint)
diabetes (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Glucomannan & Why Does Form Matter?

Glucomannan is classified under WEIGHT METABOLISM and has been investigated across 29 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (3 g, 50 g, 4 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Glucomannan frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (4 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Glucomannan acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Glucomannan an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 29 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 7,830 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39528010 (2025) — "Does glucomannan supplementation exert profitable effects on serum lipid profile in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis." (However, these significant decreases are not clinically important.) • PMID:39385065 (2024) — "The effect of glucomannan supplementation on lipid profile in adults: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: Glucomannan supplementation has a beneficial effect on the level of TC and LDL-C.) • PMID:37778464 (2023) — "Comparative effects of nutraceuticals on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 111 randomized clinical trials." (Supplementations with green tea (MD: -1.25 kg, 95%CI: -1.68, -0.82) and glucomannan (MD: -1.36 kg, 95%CI: -2.17, -0.54) demonstrated small weight loss, also the certainty of evidence was rated low.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 37778464-1.77 (-2.77–-0.78)PMID 28356275-0.35 (-0.46–-0.25)PMID 257013312.04 (0.52–3.56)PMID 18842808-15.99 (-24.3–-14.26)-28Null (0)7.7Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 3 g · 50 g · 4 g · 250 mg over 8 weeks · 12 weeks · 16 weeks · 3 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Glucomannan, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (3 g · 50 g · 4 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 8 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (29 Studies) · 17 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators (2025) PMID: 39528010 ↗
Does glucomannan supplementation exert profitable effects on serum lipid profile in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (SMD -2.26). Key conclusion: However, these significant decreases are not clinically important.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Considering dyslipidemia's impact on cardiovascular disease and even chronic illnesses and the beneficial effect of glucomannan on dyslipidemia, this study aimed to examine how glucomannan affects lipid profile parameters thoroughly. Using standard keywords, the databases Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to December 2024. Based on our finding, glucomannan significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC) (SMD: -2.26; 95 % CI: -2.98, -1.55, p <0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (SMD: -2.57; 95 % CI: -3.41, -1.74; p<0.001), but not effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (SMD: -0.33; 95 % CI: -0.70, 0.03, p=0.075), and triglyceride (TG) (SMD: -0.16; 95 % CI: -0.59, 0.27, p =0.473). However, these significant decreases are not clinically important. Therefore, glucomannan only can be considered as an adjunctive therapeutic approach in managing dyslipidemia.

02
META-ANALYSIS BMC cardiovascular disorders (2024) PMID: 39385065 ↗
The effect of glucomannan supplementation on lipid profile in adults: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in BMC cardiovascular disorders; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (SMD -3.299). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Glucomannan supplementation has a beneficial effect on the level of TC and LDL-C.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Glucomannan has been studied for various health benefits, but its effects on lipid profile in adults are not well understood. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of glucomannan supplementation on serum/plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), Apo B1, Apo A1, APO-B/ A1 ratio, and LDL-C/ HDL-C in adults. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to June 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing glucomannan supplementation on lipid profile in adults. Data were extracted and analyzed using random effects model to determine the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each biomarker. RESULTS: Glucomannan supplementation significantly decreased TC (SMD: -3.299; 95% CI: -4.955, -1.664, P < 0.001; I 2 = 95.41%, P-heterogeneity < 0.001), LDL-C (SMD: -2.993; 95% CI: -4.958, -1.028; P = 0.006; I 2 = 95.49%, P-heterogeneity < 0.001), and Apo B1 (SMD: -2.2; 95% CI: -3.58, -0.82; P = 0.01). However, glucomannan did not alter the levels of TG (SMD: -0.119; 95% CI: -1.076, 0.837, P = 0.789; I 2 = 91.63%, P-heterogeneity < 0.001), Apo A1 (SMD: -0.48; 95% CI: -6.27, 5.32; P = 0.76), APO-B/ A1 ratio (SMD: -1.15; 95% CI: -2.91, 0.61; P = 0.11), and LDL-C/ HDL-C ratio (SMD: -2.2; 95% CI: -7.28, 2.87; P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Glucomannan supplementation has a beneficial effect on the level of TC and LDL-C. © 2024. The Author(s).

03
META-ANALYSIS Pharmacological research (2023) PMID: 37778464 ↗
Comparative effects of nutraceuticals on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 111 randomized clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Pharmacological research involving n = 6,171 participants (MD -1.77). Key conclusion: Supplementations with green tea (MD: -1.25 kg, 95%CI: -1.68, -0.82) and glucomannan (MD: -1.36 kg, 95%CI: -2.17, -0.54) demonstrated small weight loss, also the certainty of evidence was rated low.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

There is no research on the comparative effects of nutraceuticals on weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity. This study aimed at quantifying and ranking the effects of different nutraceuticals on weight loss. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to November 2022. We included randomized trials evaluating the comparative effects of two or more nutraceuticals, or compared a nutraceutical against a placebo for weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity. We conducted random-effects network meta-analysis with a Frequentist framework to estimate mean difference [MD] and 95% confidence interval [CI] of the effect of nutraceuticals on weight loss. One hundred and eleven RCTs with 6171 participants that investigated the effects of 18 nutraceuticals on body weight were eligible. In the main analysis incorporating all trials, there was high certainty of evidence for supplementation of spirulina (MD: -1.77 kg, 95% CI: -2.77, -0.78) and moderate certainty of evidence that supplementation of curcumin (MD: -0.82 kg, 95% CI: -1.33, -0.30), psyllium (MD: -3.70 kg, 95% CI: -5.18, -2.22), chitosan (MD: -1.70 kg, 95% CI: -2.62, -0.78), and Nigella sativa (MD: -2.09 kg, 95%CI: -2.92, -1.26) could result in a small improvement in body weight. Supplementations with green tea (MD: -1.25 kg, 95%CI: -1.68, -0.82) and glucomannan (MD: -1.36 kg, 95%CI: -2.17, -0.54) demonstrated small weight loss, also the certainty of evidence was rated low. Based on our findings, supplementations with nutraceuticals can result in a small weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity.

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 36771306 ↗
Effects of Glucomannan Supplementation on Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Humans: A Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 440 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (SMD -1.19). Key conclusion: Glucomannan not only reduced the total cholesterol (TC) (MD -0.38 [95% CI: -0.61, -0.15], p = 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (MD -0.35 [95% CI: -0.52, -0.17], p < 0.0001) compared with the control group, but also reduced the fasting blood glucose (FBG) (MD -1.08
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The hypoglycemic and lipid-lowering effects of glucomannan are widely known, and it is a potential effective treatment for type II diabetes. In this study, we evaluated the effects of glucomannan supplementation on blood-lipid-related indicators, blood-glucose-related indicators, blood pressure (BP), and body weight (BW) in patients suffering from type II diabetes. We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, the comprehensive biomedical research database (Embase), Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for literature on glucomannan and type II diabetes. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible (n = 440 participants) to be included in our analysis. Glucomannan not only reduced the total cholesterol (TC) (MD -0.38 [95% CI: -0.61, -0.15], p = 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (MD -0.35 [95% CI: -0.52, -0.17], p < 0.0001) compared with the control group, but also reduced the fasting blood glucose (FBG) (MD -1.08 [95% CI: -1.65, -0.50], p = 0.0002), 2 h postprandial blood glucose (P2hBG) (MD -1.92 [95% CI: -3.19, -0.65], p = 0.003), fasting insulin (FINS) (MD -1.59 [95% CI: -2.69, -0.50], p = 0.004), and serum fructosamine (SFRA) levels (SMD -1.19 [95% CI: -1.74, -0.64], p < 0.0001). Our analysis indicates that glucomannan is an effective nutritional intervention for type II diabetes.

05
META-ANALYSIS International journal of obesity (2005) (2021) PMID: 33976376 ↗
Efficacy of dietary supplements containing isolated organic compounds for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of obesity (2005); statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: While some dietary supplements containing isolated organic compounds warrant further investigation to determine efficacy and safety, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend any of these dietary supplements for weight loss.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise evidence on the efficacy of dietary supplements containing isolated organic compounds for weight loss. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cinahl) were searched until December 2019. Sixty-seven randomised placebo-controlled trials of dietary supplements containing isolated organic compounds for weight loss were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for chitosan, glucomannan, conjugated linoleic acid and fructans, comparing mean weight difference post-intervention between participants receiving the dietary supplement or placebo. RESULTS: Statistically significant weight differences compared to placebo were observed for chitosan (-1.84 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.79, -0.88; p < 0.01), glucomannan (-1.27 kg; 95%CI -2.45, -0.09; p = 0.04), and conjugated linoleic acid (-1.08 kg; 95%CI -1.61, -0.55; p < 0.01). None met our threshold for clinical significance (≥2.5 kg). There was no statistically significant effect on weight for fructans compared to placebo (p = 0.24). For dietary supplements with an inadequate number of trials for meta-analysis, a statistically and borderline clinically significant weight difference compared to placebo was found for modified cellulose, manno-oligosaccharides (in males), blood orange juice extract, and three multiple-ingredient dietary supplements. These were only reported in one trial of each. Thus, more evidence is needed before recommending them for weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: While some dietary supplements containing isolated organic compounds warrant further investigation to determine efficacy and safety, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend any of these dietary supplements for weight loss. © 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

06
META-ANALYSIS Journal of the American College of Nutrition (2014) PMID: 24533610 ↗
The efficacy of glucomannan supplementation in overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2014 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of the American College of Nutrition. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The evidence from available RCTs does not show that glucomannan intake generates statistically significant weight loss.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: The increased prevalence of obesity has resulted in the current high popularity of dietary supplements marketed as weight reducing agents. The efficacy of most of these supplements is not established. The soluble fiber, glucomannan, is often recommended for weight loss. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for or against the efficacy of glucomannan in body weight reduction. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, Amed, and The Cochrane Library. Hand searches of bibliography were also conducted. Outcomes of interest were body weight and body mass index. Studies involving only overweight and/or obese participants were included. Two reviewers independently determined the eligibility of studies and assessed the reporting quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), using the CONSORT and PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Eighteen trials were identified, and 9 were included. There was a variation in the reporting quality of the included RCTs. A meta-analysis (random effect model) of 8 RCTs revealed a nonstatistically significant difference in weight loss between glucomannan and placebo (mean difference [MD]: -0.22 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.62, 0.19; I(2) = 65%). Adverse events included abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, and constipation. CONCLUSION: The evidence from available RCTs does not show that glucomannan intake generates statistically significant weight loss. Future trials should be more rigorous and better reported.

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) European journal of nutrition (2025) PMID: 41117955 ↗
Effects of konjac glucomannan on gastrointestinal symptoms and gut microbiota in athletes with functional constipation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Konjac glucomannan significantly ameliorated gastrointestinal symptoms in elite athletes with functional constipation, potentially via modulation of the gut microbiota.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Athletes are at increased risk for functional constipation due to high-intensity training, irregular diets, and disrupted circadian rhythms. Soluble fibers, particularly konjac glucomannan (KGM), have shown potential in alleviating constipation, but clinical evidence, especially in athletes, is limited. This study aimed to assess the effects of an 8-week KGM intervention on gastrointestinal symptoms and gut microbiota in elite male Taekwondo athletes with functional constipation. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, we enrolled male elite Taekwondo athletes diagnosed with functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either KGM supplementation (dietary intervention group, DG) or placebo (control group, CG) for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes included the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM), Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL), bowel movement frequency (BMF), Bristol Stool Scale, and the Bowel Function Index (BFI). Stool samples were collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing to evaluate microbial composition and diversity. RESULTS: Compared to the placebo group, the KGM group exhibited significant improvements in PAC-SYM, PAC-QoL, BMF, and BFI scores (p < 0.05 for all). Microbial analysis revealed a marked increase in α-diversity and elevated relative abundances of Prevotella_9, Phascolarctobacterium, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and members of the Prevotellaceae family, alongside reduced levels of Alistipes and Desulfovibrio. Correlation analyses indicated a strong association between microbial shifts and symptom improvement. Functional predictions further suggested differential expression in microbial metabolic pathways, including upregulation of biotin biosynthesis I and nitrate reduction VI (assimilatory), and downregulation of L-methionine biosynthesis III (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Konjac glucomannan significantly ameliorated gastrointestinal symptoms in elite athletes with functional constipation, potentially via modulation of the gut microbiota. © 2025. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

08
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of nutrition (2025) PMID: 40490608 ↗
Impact of a mineral enriched, fiber complex on glycaemic response and satiation in healthy adults: a double-blind, crossover intervention study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: These novel findings suggest that SB can modulate insulin response and influence appetite regulation, highlighting its potential use in weight management strategies.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of a chromium-enriched glucomannan-fructooligosaccharide complex (SB) on glycaemic and insulin responses, satiation, and hunger biomarkers in healthy adults. METHODS: Using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover design, we assessed the acute impact of a single 3 g SB dose in 16 healthy adults (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) during a modified oral glucose tolerance test. On separate days, participants consumed 50 g dextrose or 50 g dextrose with 3 g SB (SBD). Blood glucose and insulin were analysed over 2.5 h. Hunger, fullness, and desire to eat were assessed via visual analogue scales. Additionally, the impact of SB on gastric viscosity was assessed in vitro. RESULTS: SBD intake significantly reduced the insulin concentration compared to dextrose alone at 45, 75, and 90 min post-intake. Additionally, SBD resulted in significantly greater fullness and a lower desire to eat at 75 min when compared to dextrose (p < 0.05). Although hunger increased over time for both interventions, SBD led to lower hunger, desire to eat, and food desire scores compared to dextrose at 150 min (p < 0.05). The viscosity of SB, even when combined with dextrose, was significantly higher compared to dextrose alone. CONCLUSIONS: These novel findings suggest that SB can modulate insulin response and influence appetite regulation, highlighting its potential use in weight management strategies. © 2025. The Author(s).

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2024) PMID: 39064648 ↗
Impact of Combined Prebiotic Galacto-Oligosaccharides and Bifidobacterium breve-Derived Postbiotic on Gut Microbiota and HbA1c in Prediabetic Adults: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: No significant changes were observed in the placebo group.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The complex interactions between intestinal microbiota and metabolic disorders are well-documented, with implications for glucose metabolism, energy expenditure, and intestinal permeability. Prebiotics induce beneficial changes in gut microbiota composition in prediabetes, while postbiotics can enhance gut barrier function, complementing each other to improve glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. This study investigated the effects of a 12-week dietary fibre (DF) supplement on gut health, metabolic function, and diet. The supplement contained konjac glucomannan (KGM), galacto-oligosaccharides (GOSs), and exopolysaccharides (EPSs) from Bifidobacterium breve. In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, 53 prediabetic volunteers were randomly assigned to either a daily DF supplement (YMETA) or a placebo (cellulose microcrystalline) for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up. Measurements included gut microbiota composition, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), plasma lipids, anthropometry, body composition, blood pressure, and dietary intake. The intervention group showed a significant increase in alpha diversity and butyrate-producing bacteria, with reductions in HbA1c and FPG levels below prediabetes thresholds. No significant changes were observed in the placebo group. This study suggests that manipulating the human gut microbiome through dietary interventions could be a promising therapeutic approach to managing prediabetes and preventing or delaying diabetes.

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2024) PMID: 38398881 ↗
The Impact of Glucomannan, Inulin, and Psyllium Supplementation (Soloways(TM)) on Weight Loss in Adults with FTO, LEP, LEPR, and MC4R Polymorphisms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 112 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: Dietary supplementation with glucomannan, inulin, and psyllium effectively promotes weight loss and improves body composition in individuals with obesity, particularly those with specific genetic polymorphisms.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This study aimed to determine the impact of a fiber supplement on body weight and composition in individuals with obesity with specific genetic polymorphisms. It involved 112 adults with obesity, each with at least one minor allele in the FTO, LEP, LEPR, or MC4R polymorphism. Participants were randomized to receive either a fiber supplement (glucomannan, inulin, and psyllium) or a placebo for 180 days. The experimental group showed significant reductions in body weight (treatment difference: -4.9%; 95% CI: -6.9% to -2.9%; p < 0.01) and BMI (treatment difference: -1.4 kg/m2; 95% CI: -1.7 to -1.2; p < 0.01) compared to placebo. Further significant decreases in fat mass (treatment difference: -13.0%; 95% CI: -14.4 to -11.7; p < 0.01) and visceral fat rating (treatment difference: -1.3; 95% CI: -1.6 to -1.0; p < 0.01) were noted. Homozygous minor allele carriers experienced greater decreases in body weight (treatment difference: -3.2%; 95% CI: -4.9% to -1.6%; p < 0.01) and BMI (treatment difference: -1.2 kg/m2; 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.4; p < 0.01) compared to heterozygous allele carriers. These carriers also had a more significant reduction in fat mass (treatment difference: -9.8%; 95% CI: -10.6 to -9.1; p < 0.01) and visceral fat rating (treatment difference: -0.9; 95% CI: -1.3 to -0.5; p < 0.01). A high incidence of gastrointestinal events was reported in the experimental group (74.6%), unlike the placebo group, which reported no side effects. Dietary supplementation with glucomannan, inulin, and psyllium effectively promotes weight loss and improves body composition in individuals with obesity, particularly those with specific genetic polymorphisms.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category