NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

L-Carnitine (Weight)

WEIGHT METABOLISM · Evidence Monograph

L-Carnitine (Weight) is an evidence-graded weight metabolism monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (8 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 26,465 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 8 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 7 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 26,465
Reported Trial Dosages 2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 30 weeks · 26 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
blood pressure (PubMed clinical endpoint)
weight (PubMed clinical endpoint)
diabetes (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is L-Carnitine (Weight) & Why Does Form Matter?

L-Carnitine (Weight) is classified under WEIGHT METABOLISM and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (2000 mg/day, 4000 mg/day, 1 g/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for L-Carnitine (Weight) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (7 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, L-Carnitine (Weight) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns L-Carnitine (Weight) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 8 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 7 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 26,465 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41177307 (2025) — "Effects of carnitine supplementation on glycemic markers in women with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (Carnitine supplementation yields modest but clinically meaningful improvements in fasting glucose, insulin levels, and insulin resistance among overweight and obese women, particularly with higher dosages and longer interventions.) • PMID:40298161 (2025) — "The Effect of the L-Carnitine Supplementation on Obesity Indices: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis." (CONCLUSION: The findings of this umbrella meta-analysis support that supplementation of L-carnitine supplementation can successfully manage weight, BMI, and WC reduction.) • PMID:38594107 (2024) — "The Effects of L-Carnitine Supplementation on Weight Loss, Glycemic Control, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." (IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation resulted in a small reduction in serum lipids and plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 41177307-2.93 (-5.2–-0.65)PMID 38594107-0.37 (-0.59–-0.15)PMID 38101999-0.5 (-3.79–1.35)PMID 32359762-0.24 (-0.37–-0.1)-6.2Null (0)2.3Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day · 2 g/day over 12 weeks · 30 weeks · 26 weeks · 6 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for L-Carnitine (Weight), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (2000 mg/day · 4000 mg/day · 1 g/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 20 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Diabetes research and clinical practice (2025) PMID: 41177307 ↗
Effects of carnitine supplementation on glycemic markers in women with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Diabetes research and clinical practice (MD -2.93). Key conclusion: Carnitine supplementation yields modest but clinically meaningful improvements in fasting glucose, insulin levels, and insulin resistance among overweight and obese women, particularly with higher dosages and longer interventions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Women with overweight or obesity face heightened risks of insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. L-carnitine, a key mediator of mitochondrial fatty acid transport, has been proposed to improve glycemic regulation, yet evidence in this subgroup remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of carnitine supplementation versus placebo on glycemic markers in overweight or obese women. Major databases were searched through October 2025. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Predefined subgroup analyses explored dose and intervention duration effects. A total of eight studies comprising nine randomized controlled trial (RCT) arms were included. Carnitine supplementation significantly reduced fasting blood sugar (FBS; WMD -2.93 mg/dL, 95 % CI -5.20 to -0.65), fasting insulin (WMD -3.54 μU/mL, 95 % CI -7.00 to -0.07), and HOMA-IR (WMD -0.69, 95 % CI -1.26 to -0.13), but had no significant effect on QUICKI. Subgroup analyses indicated stronger effects at higher doses (≥2000 mg/day) and longer durations (≥12 weeks). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings, with no evidence of publication bias. Carnitine supplementation yields modest but clinically meaningful improvements in fasting glucose, insulin levels, and insulin resistance among overweight and obese women, particularly with higher dosages and longer interventions. These results highlight carnitine's potential as an adjunctive nutritional strategy.

02
META-ANALYSIS International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition (2025) PMID: 40298161 ↗
The Effect of the L-Carnitine Supplementation on Obesity Indices: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition involving n = 16,352 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.005. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The findings of this umbrella meta-analysis support that supplementation of L-carnitine supplementation can successfully manage weight, BMI, and WC reduction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: Obesity, one of the most frequent health risks, represents a global public health problem. The potential impact of L-carnitine, a vital nutrient for energy metabolism, on weight loss is worth considering. However, given the inconclusive results from recent meta-analyses on L-carnitine, we conducted an umbrella meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and controlled trials to evaluate the effect of L-carnitine on anthropometric indices. METHODS: Data synthesis: A comprehensive search approach using the relevant keywords was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus databases, and Google Scholar up to March 2023. Meta-analyses published in English that provided quantitative statistical analyses regarding the effects of L-carnitine on body weight, waist circumference (WC), and body mass index (BMI) were included. A random-effects model and subgroup analysis were performed based on the L-carnitine dosage and study population. RESULTS: A total of 16,352 participants were included. Intervention durations ranged from 8 to 30 weeks, with L-carnitine dosages ranging between 150 and 4000 mg/day. The pooled results of the eight included meta-analyses indicated that L-carnitine supplementation can significantly decrease weight (effect size (ES) = -1.11; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): -1.90, -0.33, p = 0.005; I2 = 90.6%, p < 0.001), BMI (ES = -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61, -0.04, p = 0.026; I2 = 89.8%, p < 0.001), and WC (ES = -1.34; 95% CI: -1.83, -0.85, p < 0.001; I2 = 00.0%, p = 0.442). CONCLUSION: The findings of this umbrella meta-analysis support that supplementation of L-carnitine supplementation can successfully manage weight, BMI, and WC reduction. Therefore, L-carnitine might help treat obesity. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42022307951. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

03
META-ANALYSIS Clinical therapeutics (2024) PMID: 38594107 ↗
The Effects of L-Carnitine Supplementation on Weight Loss, Glycemic Control, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical therapeutics involving n = 13 participants (MD -0.37). Key conclusion: IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation resulted in a small reduction in serum lipids and plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: L-carnitine supplementation has been recommended to improve cardiometabolic health markers in diabetic patients. Our purpose was to assess the dose-dependent effects of l-carnitine supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until May 2022 for randomized controlled trials that examined the impact of l-carnitine supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with type 2 diabetes. The mean difference (MD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated utilizing a random-effects model. Nonlinear dose-response associations were modeled with restricted cubic splines. The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. FINDINGS: Twenty-one randomized trials with 2041 patients with type 2 diabetes were included. We found that every 1 g/d supplementation with l-carnitine significantly reduced body mass index (MD: -0.37 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.59, -0.15; I2 =93%, n=13, GRADE=low), HbA1c (MD: -0.16%, 95% CI: -0.32, -0.01; I2 = 94%, n = 18, GRADE = moderate), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: -0.11 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.05; I2 = 91%, n = 11, GRADE = high). There were also reductions in serum triglycerides (MD: 0.07 mmol/L), total cholesterol (MD: -0.13 mmol/L), and fasting plasma glucose (MD: -0.17 mmol/L). A U-shaped effect was demonstrated for body mass index, with the largest reduction at 2 g/d. A linear reduction was seen for serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose up to l-carnitine supplementation of 4 g/d. IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation resulted in a small reduction in serum lipids and plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, due to high statistical heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted very cautiously.

04
META-ANALYSIS Clinical therapeutics (2024) PMID: 38101999 ↗
The Effects of L-Carnitine Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical therapeutics involving n = 1,412 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.352 (MD -0.5). Key conclusion: IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation in adults did not significantly affect BP.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: Hypertension stands as a prominent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, making it of utmost importance to address. Studies have shown that L-carnitine supplementation may lower blood pressure (BP) parameters in different populations. Therefore, we have conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of published Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), including the most recent articles on the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on BP. METHODS: PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane databases, and Scopus were used to collect RCT studies published up to October 2022 without limitations in language. Inclusion criteria were adult participants and recipients of L-carnitine in oral supplemental forms. The funnel plot test, Begg's test, and Egger's test were used to examine publication bias. FINDINGS: After the search strategy, 22 RCTs (n = 1412) with 24 effect sizes fulfilled the criteria. It was found L-Carnitine supplementation did not have a significant effect on systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mm Hg) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.22 mm Hg, 95% CI: -3.79, 1.35; P = 0.352; I2 = 85.0%, P < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) (WMD = -0.50 mm Hg, 95% CI: -1.49, 0.48; P = 0.318; I2 = 43.4%, P = 0.021) in the pooled analysis. Subgroup analyses have shown that L-carnitine supplementation had no lowering effect on SBP in any subgroup. However, there was a significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure in participants with a baseline body mass index >30 kg/m2 (WMD = -1.59 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.11, -0.06; P = 0.041; I2 = 41.3%, P = 0.164). There was a significant nonlinear relationship between the duration of L-carnitine intervention and changes in SBP (coefficients = -6.83, P = 0.045). IMPLICATIONS: L-carnitine supplementation in adults did not significantly affect BP. But anyway, more studies should be done in this field on different individuals.

05
META-ANALYSIS PeerJ (2023) PMID: 38025704 ↗
Comparison of nutritional supplements in improving glycolipid metabolism and endocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in PeerJ involving n = 2,362 participants. Key conclusion: Meanwhile, coenzyme Q10 was more efficacious for improving lipid metabolism.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To explore the comparative effectiveness of nutritional supplements in improving glycolipid metabolism and endocrine function in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHOD: Randomized controlled clinical trials on the effects of nutritional supplements in PCOS patients were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their establishments to March 15, 2023. Then, literature screening, data extraction, and network meta-analysis were performed. This study was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD 42023441257). RESULT: Forty-one articles involving 2,362 patients were included in this study. The network meta-analysis showed that carnitine, inositol, and probiotics reduced body weight and body mass index (BMI) compared to placebo, and carnitine outperformed the other supplements (SUCRAs: 96.04%, 97.73%, respectively). Omega-3 lowered fasting blood glucose (FBG) (SUCRAs: 93.53%), and chromium reduced fasting insulin (FINS) (SUCRAs: 72.90%); both were superior to placebo in improving insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), and chromium was more effective than Omega-3 (SUCRAs: 79.99%). Selenium was potent in raising the quantitative insulin sensitivity index (QUICKI) (SUCRAs: 87.92%). Coenzyme Q10 was the most effective in reducing triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (SUCRAs: 87.71%, 98.78%, and 98.70%, respectively). Chromium and probiotics decreased TG levels, while chromium and vitamin D decreased TC levels. No significant differences were observed in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total testosterone (TT), sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and C-reactive protein (CRP) between nutritional supplements and placebo. CONCLUSION: Carnitine was relatively effective in reducing body mass, while chromium, Omega-3, and selenium were beneficial for improving glucose metabolism. Meanwhile, coenzyme Q10 was more efficacious for improving lipid metabolism. However, publication bias may exist, and more high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials are needed. © 2023 Hu et al.

06
META-ANALYSIS Inflammopharmacology (2023) PMID: 37656233 ↗
The effects of L-carnitine supplementation on inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Inflammopharmacology involving n = 3,255 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that L-carnitine supplementation effectively reduces the inflammatory state by increasing the level of TAC and decreasing the levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF-α and MDA in the serum.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

L-carnitine supplementation may be beneficial in improving inflammatory conditions and reducing the level of inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, according to the finding of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on inflammation in adults. To obtain acceptable articles up to October 2022, a thorough search was conducted in databases including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. A random-effects model was used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD). We included the 48 RCTs (n = 3255) with 51 effect sizes in this study. L-carnitine supplementation had a significant effect on C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (p = 0.001), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (p = 0.002), malondialdehyde (MDA) (p = 0.001), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (p = 0.029), alanine transaminase (ALT) (p < 0.001), and aspartate transaminase (AST) (p < 0.001) in intervention, compared to the placebo group. Subgroup analyses showed that L-carnitine supplementation had a lowering effect on CRP and TNF-α in trial duration ≥ 12 weeks in type 2 diabetes and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. L-carnitine supplementation reduced ALT levels in overweight and normal BMI subjects at any trial dose and trial duration ≥ 12 weeks and reduced AST levels in overweight subjects and trial dose ≥ 2 g/day. This meta-analysis revealed that L-carnitine supplementation effectively reduces the inflammatory state by increasing the level of TAC and decreasing the levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF-α and MDA in the serum. © 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

07
META-ANALYSIS Gynecological endocrinology (2022) PMID: 34633275 ↗
Clinical evidence of the effects of carnitine supplementation on body weight, glycemic control and serum lipids in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Gynecological endocrinology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: These results were stable after sensitivity analysis, and no significant publication biases were detected.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders in women of reproductive age. Several clinical trials have investigated the influence of carnitine on metabolic variables in PCOS, but have yielded conflicting results. This study aimed to summarize the clinical evidence of the effects of carnitine on weight management, glycemic and serum lipids controls in women with PCOS by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and the CENTRAL database were searched from inception to March 2021 for eligible articles. Study selection and assessment of quality were conducted independently by two investigators. Effect sizes for each outcome were reported with the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The statistical heterogeneity of the included clinical trials was tested using the I2 statistic. Six studies with 672 PCOS participants were included for meta-analysis. Our results revealed that carnitine supplements significantly decreased total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides, body weight, body mass index, hip circumference, and waist circumference (All p < .05). In addition, carnitine intervention also improved the levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, no significant changes were seen in glucose homeostasis parameters. These results were stable after sensitivity analysis, and no significant publication biases were detected. Based on current evidence, carnitine supplementation in women with PCOS had beneficial effects on weight loss and lipid profiles. Further large-scale, well-designed RCTs are required to confirm these results.

08
CLINICAL STUDY Nutrients (2020) PMID: 32751906 ↗
Efficacy of Dietary Supplements to Reduce Liver Fat.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: The current evidence is scarce, of limited quality and does not support DS use to reduce liver fat.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Liver fat accumulation is an important pathophysiological feature of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease that may be modulated by dietary supplements (DS). A systematic search of the literature was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pertaining to the effect of a DS on liver fat as assessed using quantitative tomographic imaging in human adults. Where feasible, data were pooled, and meta-analyses conducted using random-effect model. Quality assessment was done according the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Twenty RCTs, involving 1171 overweight and obese adults, of which 36% were females, with or without comorbidities, were included. Only RCTs assessing omega-3 fatty acids (n = 4) and resveratrol (n = 4) qualified for meta-analysis. Results did neither favor omega-3 (effect size -1.17; weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% confidence interval (CI)) -3.62, 1.28; p < 0.001) nor resveratrol supplementation (0.18; 95% CI -1.08, 1.43; p = 0.27). The findings of the qualitatively summarized RCTs suggested that catechins (n = 1), Lactobacillus reuteri (n = 1), and carnitine (n = 1) may reduce liver fat. All other DS did not show any influence. The current evidence is scarce, of limited quality and does not support DS use to reduce liver fat. Further well-designed trials are warranted.

09
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) PMID: 32428983 ↗
Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis-related outcomes.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 217 participants (RR 0.85). Key conclusion: Approved disease-modifying therapy appears to modulate the immune system to improve MS-related outcomes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Although the exact pathogenesis remains unknown, the leading theory is that it results from immune system dysregulation. Approved disease-modifying therapy appears to modulate the immune system to improve MS-related outcomes. There is substantial interest in the ability of dietary interventions to influence MS-related outcomes. This is an update of the Cochrane Review 'Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis' (Farinotti 2003; Farinotti 2007; Farinotti 2012). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of dietary interventions (including dietary plans with recommendations for specific whole foods, macronutrients, and natural health products) compared to placebo or another intervention on health outcomes (including MS-related outcomes and serious adverse events) in people with MS. SEARCH METHODS: On 30 May 2019, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD). We checked reference lists in identified trials and requested information from trial authors to identify any additional published or unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included any randomized controlled trial (RCT) or controlled clinical trial (CCT) examining the effect of a dietary intervention versus placebo or another intervention among participants with MS on MS-related outcomes, including relapses, disability progression, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Planned primary outcomes were number of participants experiencing relapse and change in disability progression, according to a validated disability scale at the last reported follow-up. Secondary outcomes included MRI activity, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. We entered and analysed data in Review Manager 5. MAIN RESULTS: We found 41 full-text articles examining 30 trials following full-text review. Participants were adults with MS, defined by est

10
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2020) PMID: 32359762 ↗
Effects of l-carnitine supplementation on weight loss and body composition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 randomized controlled clinical trials with dose-response analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 2,292 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -0.24). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: l-carnitine supplementation provides a modest reducing effect on body weight, BMI and fat mass, especially among adults with overweight/obesity.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clinical evidence which investigated the effects of l-carnitine, a vitamin-like substance, on weight loss had led to inconsistent results. This study therefore aimed to examine the effect of l-carnitine supplementation on body weight and composition by including the maximum number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to conduct a dose-response analysis, for the first time. METHODS AND RESULTS: Online databases were searched up to January 2019. In total, 37 RCTs (with 2292 participants) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that l-carnitine supplementation significantly decreased body weight [Weighted mean difference (WMD) = -1.21 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.73, -0.68; P < 0.001], body mass index (BMI) (WMD = -0.24 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.37, -0.10; P = 0.001), and fat mass (WMD = -2.08 kg, 95% CI: -3.44, -0.72; P = 0.003). No significant effect was seen for waist circumference (WC) and body fat percent. The meta-analysis of high-quality RCTs only confirmed the effect on body weight. A non-linear dose-response association was seen between l-carnitine supplementation and body weight reduction (P < 0.001) suggesting that ingestion of 2000 mg l-carnitine per day provides the maximum effect in adults. This association was not seen for BMI, WC and body fat percent. CONCLUSIONS: l-carnitine supplementation provides a modest reducing effect on body weight, BMI and fat mass, especially among adults with overweight/obesity.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category