NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

Hawthorn (Heart)

CARDIOVASCULAR · Evidence Monograph

Hawthorn (Heart) is an evidence-graded cardiovascular monograph evaluated across 28 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 5,110 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 28 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 7 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (1 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 5,110
Reported Trial Dosages 100 g · 0.25 mg · 450 mg
Trial Duration Range 6 months · 12 months · 4 weeks
Reading Time ~14 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 28 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (100 g · 0.25 mg · 450 mg) over a structured 6 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary cardiovascular clinical efficacy (28 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (10 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (6 RCTs · 1 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 7 reviews)
01

What Is Hawthorn (Heart) & Why Does Form Matter?

Hawthorn (Heart) is classified under CARDIOVASCULAR and has been investigated across 28 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (100 g, 0.25 mg, 450 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Hawthorn (Heart) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Hawthorn (Heart) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Hawthorn (Heart) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 28 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (1 double-blind, n = 5,110 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41367255 (2025) — "Evaluating the Sustaining Play, Sustaining Health programme in Australian early childhood education and care services: a pilot randomized controlled trial." (Future fully powered trials should consider addressing broader barriers including staff turnover, motivation/attitudes, and fit within broader contexts to increase impact.) • PMID:40539376 (2025) — "Bipolar Early Intervention Using New Digital Technologies (BLEND): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Novel Blended-Digital Early Intervention Model of Care for Youth With Bipolar Disorder I or II." (Concordant with the aims of a pilot study, there is scope for the content to be rationalised based on feedback to improve feasibility of the digital therapy.) • PMID:37313987 (2023) — "Acute neurocognitive and subjective effects of oral methamphetamine with low doses of alcohol: A randomised controlled trial." (Strong stimulative effects of methamphetamine appear to mask the biphasic sedative and performance effects of low doses of alcohol, which may underlie motivations for co-consumption in recreational settings and increase propensity for harm.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 100 g · 0.25 mg · 450 mg · 26 mcg over 6 months · 12 months · 4 weeks · 14 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Hawthorn (Heart), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (100 g · 0.25 mg · 450 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 6 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (28 Studies) · 10 Quantitative Analyses

01
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Health promotion international (2025) PMID: 41367255 ↗
Evaluating the Sustaining Play, Sustaining Health programme in Australian early childhood education and care services: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Health promotion international. Key conclusion: Future fully powered trials should consider addressing broader barriers including staff turnover, motivation/attitudes, and fit within broader contexts to increase impact.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Early childhood education and care (ECEC) services are a recommended setting to deliver interventions improving children's physical activity (PA). Indoor-outdoor free play, where children move freely between indoor-outdoor environments, can increase child PA. However, these programmes in ECECs are often not sustained. This study aims to assess the acceptability, feasibility, impact, adoption and cost of the Sustaining Play, Sustaining Health (SPSH) programme on sustainment of indoor-outdoor free play programmes in ECECs. A 6-month parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted with 16 ECEC services across New South Wales, Australia, following removal of COronaVIrus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) recommendations. Services implementing indoor-outdoor programmes were randomized to (i) SPSH programme (n = 8) or (ii) usual care control group (n = 8). The intervention included eight strategies to target identified barriers, informed by the Integrated Sustainability Framework. Primary outcomes at 6 months were acceptability, feasibility, adoption, cost, and barriers/facilitators. Potential impact (sustainment) was measured at 6 (primary) and 12 months using nonparametric analysis. Overall, 31.48% (17/54) of eligible services consented and 16 randomized. Statistically insignificant mean differences between groups in indoor-outdoor free play were 26.27 minutes at 6 months, and 2.87 minutes at 12 months, favouring the intervention group. The SPSH programme was considered acceptable and feasible and costed AUD $452.38 ($289.74 USD) to deliver per service. There were no changes in sustainability barriers/facilitators. This pilot found mean differences favouring the intervention group for sustaining indoor-outdoor free play programmes in ECECs, particularly at 12 months. Future fully powered trials should consider addressing broader barriers including staff turnover, motivation/attitudes, and fit within broader contexts to increase impact. © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Early intervention in psychiatry (2025) PMID: 40539376 ↗
Bipolar Early Intervention Using New Digital Technologies (BLEND): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Novel Blended-Digital Early Intervention Model of Care for Youth With Bipolar Disorder I or II.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Early intervention in psychiatry. Key conclusion: Concordant with the aims of a pilot study, there is scope for the content to be rationalised based on feedback to improve feasibility of the digital therapy.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence for early interventions for bipolar disorder (BD), there are relatively few accessible treatment models. We developed a digitally augmented model of care termed BLEND (BipoLar early interventions using New Digital technologies) which aims to improve mood symptoms in BD. BLEND includes: (a) guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy; (b) in-person psychological therapies blended with digital therapeutic content and (c) digital relapse monitoring. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) describe the acceptability, safety and feasibility of delivering BLEND and (ii) examine the feasibility of an efficacy trial of BLEND compared with enhanced standard care (ESC). METHOD: We conducted a parallel-group, open-label, 2:1 randomised pilot trial within a youth mental-health outpatient service in Melbourne, Australia. We included youth aged 15-25 years with BD I or II, who had not previously accessed multidisciplinary care. All participants received similar background care. BLEND differed from ESC in having manualised blended digital and in-person psychological therapies and digital relapse monitoring. RESULTS: We randomised 21 young people over a 12-month recruitment period, predominantly female participants (71.4%) with BD Type II (85.7%). Both treatment models were acceptable and safe, but the BLEND group had greater reductions in suicidal ideation. Among components of BLEND, in-person psychological therapy and psychopharmacological interventions could be delivered with fidelity. Digital therapy engagement was high, but participants used digital relapse monitoring variably. CONCLUSIONS: The BLEND model was safe and acceptable and may lead to improvements in suicidality compared with ESC. Concordant with the aims of a pilot study, there is scope for the content to be rationalised based on feedback to improve feasibility of the digital therapy. Relapse monitoring may usefully be extended to depressive symptoms. The next step is to confirm the efficacy of BLEND compared with standard care. © 2025 The Author(s). Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) (2023) PMID: 37313987 ↗
Acute neurocognitive and subjective effects of oral methamphetamine with low doses of alcohol: A randomised controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England). Key conclusion: Strong stimulative effects of methamphetamine appear to mask the biphasic sedative and performance effects of low doses of alcohol, which may underlie motivations for co-consumption in recreational settings and increase propensity for harm.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine is often recreationally co-consumed with alcohol due to desirable off-target effects; however, the acute neurocognitive and subjective consequences of combined use are unclear. METHODS: In a randomised, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, cross-over study design, the effects of acute oral methamphetamine (0.42 mg/kg) were assessed with and without low doses of alcohol (target 0.04% blood-alcohol concentration, BAC) on subjective intoxication, alertness, physiological outcomes and neurocognition during the ascending and descending phases of the BAC curve. Sixteen healthy adults (mean age = 30.4 years, SD ± 4.4, 67% male) completed four experimental sessions over 4 weeks involving a one-week washout period. RESULTS: Cardiovascular measures [heart rate (beats/minute), blood pressure (mmHg)] were predictably elevated following methamphetamine, but unaffected by combined alcohol use. Methamphetamine and alcohol produce divergent effects on subjective alertness and sedation across time, yet their combination produced predominantly sustained stimulative effects independent of the biphasic alcohol curve. At a peak BAC of 0.029%, alcohol alone impaired performance across most functional neurocognitive domains relative to placebo and methamphetamine only, and the addition of methamphetamine attenuated these effects. Methamphetamine alone produced isolated improvement in psychomotor speed consistent with peak drug effects. CONCLUSION: Methamphetamine combined with alcohol does not substantially alter the physiological or metabolic profile compared to either drug alone. Strong stimulative effects of methamphetamine appear to mask the biphasic sedative and performance effects of low doses of alcohol, which may underlie motivations for co-consumption in recreational settings and increase propensity for harm.

04
CLINICAL STUDY PloS one (2023) PMID: 36735692 ↗
Associations of physical activity levels, and attitudes towards physical activity with blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure in Bangladesh.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in PloS one involving n = 68 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Participating in high physical activity and pos
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is important for the control of high blood pressure (hypertension). We aimed to investigate the associations of current physical activity levels, sedentary time, knowledge of and attitude towards physical activity with blood pressure in people with hypertension in a rural area in Bangladesh. METHODS: A total of 307 adults aged 30 to 75 years with hypertension were recruited from the Banshgram Union of Narial district as part of a cluster-randomized control trial. Current blood pressure was measured as the outcome variable. Associated variables included physical activity at work, travel to and from places, recreational activity, metabolic equivalent task (MET)-min, sedentary time, and awareness of and attitudes towards physical activity. Rasch analysis was used to compute a combined score from the five awareness of and attitudes towards physical activity items and categorized into 0-40 (towards negative attitude), 41-60 score (mixed attitude) and 61-100 (positive attitude). We used a generalised linear model to analyze the data. RESULTS: Participants (n = 68, 22.1%) who engaged in vigorous-intensity physical activity that causes large increases in breathing or heart rate like carrying or lifting heavy loads, digging or construction work for at least 10 minutes continuously had lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mean (95% confidence interval (CI)), 143.6 (140.1, 147.2)) compared to those who did not take part in a vigorous-intensity physical activity (mean (95% CI), 150 (147.6, 152.3)). MET-min less than 600 min/week was significantly associated with higher SBP 153.8 (148.1, 159.6) than MET-min 600-2999 min/week 148.0 (143.0, 152.9) and MET-min>3000 min/week 146.9 (144.5, 149.3), p = 0.001 for trend. Sitting time more than four hours a day was associated with higher DBP 91.4 (89.7, 93.0) compared to those who had sitting time less than fours a day 88.6 (87.1, 90.1). People with positive attitudes were associated with a reduced SBP of 10.6 (0.36, 20.8) mmHg and DBP 5.88 (0.47, 11.3) compared to the people who had a negative attitude towards taking part in physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Participating in high physical activity and pos

05
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of environmental research and public health (2022) PMID: 36293723 ↗
Effects of the Visual Character of Transitional Spaces on Human Stress Recovery in a Virtual Reality Environment.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Clinical Study published in International journal of environmental research and public health involving n = 40 participants. Key conclusion: As people's levels of stress increase with the complexity of contemporary urban life, the stress healing agenda in built environments has become more critical than ever.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

As people's levels of stress increase with the complexity of contemporary urban life, the stress healing agenda in built environments has become more critical than ever. Previous research has demonstrated that linear and nonlinear shapes in the environment have an impact on human stress recovery. However, to date, most studies have focused on indoor and outdoor spaces, while research on transitional spaces is still limited. Transitional spaces connect the interior with the exterior and are ubiquitous in the city, such as plazas, open cafes, and urban corridors. We hypothesize that curved and linear environments affect human stress recovery differently in transitional spaces. To test this hypothesis, virtual reality (VR) technology and experiments were conducted with 40 participants. At the end of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), participants were randomly assigned to four VR environments to test which environment is more effective in stress recovery for humans. Participants' physiological data, including heart rate and blood pressure, were measured by bio-monitoring sensors. The psychological data were tested by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). In general, the resulting data indicate that the curved environment is more effective than the linear environment for the recovery of human stress in transitional spaces.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) (2022) PMID: 35875924 ↗
The chronic effects of a combination of herbal extracts (Euphytose(®)) on psychological mood state and response to a laboratory stressor: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind study in healthy humans.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England); statistical significance reported at p = 0.038. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The combination of herbal extracts contained within the MHEP reduced subjective anxiety in a healthy population and lowered electrodermal skin conductance and concentration of salivary α-amylase in response to a psychosocial stressor, compared to placebo.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Global lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders has been estimated at approximately 16.6%, with subclinical prevalence likely much higher. Herbal approaches to reduce anxiety may be as effective as pharmacological treatments and are less likely to be associated with adverse side effects. The herbal species, namely, valerian, passionflower, hawthorn and ballota, have a long history of use as anxiolytics in traditional medicine, further supported by recent pre-clinical and clinical trials. AIMS: To assess the effects of chronic (14 days) supplementation with a multi-herb extract preparation (MHEP, Euphytose®) on psychological state and psychological and physiological stress responses during a laboratory stressor. METHODS: In this crossover study, 31 healthy participants (aged 19-58 years) received a MHEP and placebo for 14 days with a 28-day washout. Anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), mood and physiological measures of stress (heart rate, galvanic skin response, salivary α-amylase and cortisol levels) were measured before and after an Observed Multitasking Stressor. Cognitive performance was also assessed. RESULTS: MHEP was associated with reduced tension-anxiety (p = 0.038), with participants showing an attenuated response to the observed multitasking psychosocial stressor following MHEP, evidenced by lower salivary α-amylase (p = 0.041) and galvanic skin response (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of herbal extracts contained within the MHEP reduced subjective anxiety in a healthy population and lowered electrodermal skin conductance and concentration of salivary α-amylase in response to a psychosocial stressor, compared to placebo. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT03909906).

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) JAMA network open (2021) PMID: 34932107 ↗
Effect of a Multiorgan Focused Clinical Ultrasonography on Length of Stay in Patients Admitted With a Cardiopulmonary Diagnosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in JAMA network open involving n = 250 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.53. Key conclusion: The length of hospital stay was 113.4 hours (95% CI, 91.7-135.1 hours) in the FCU group and 125.3 hours (95% CI, 101.7-148.8 hours) in the control group (P = .53).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Erratum in JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e2211248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11248. IMPORTANCE: There are accumulating data about the utility of diagnostic multiorgan focused clinical ultrasonography (FCU) in the assessment of patients admitted with cardiopulmonary symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adding multiorgan FCU to the initial clinical evaluation of patients admitted with cardiopulmonary symptoms reduces hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions, and in-hospital costs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prospective, parallel-group, superiority, randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The study was conducted at The Royal Melbourne Hospital, a tertiary public hospital located in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Adults aged 18 years or older admitted to the internal medicine ward with a cardiopulmonary diagnosis were enrolled between September 2018 and December 2019 and were followed up until hospital discharge. Data analysis was performed from August 2020 to January 2021. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention involved an internal medicine physician-performed heart, lung, and 2-point vein compression FCU in addition to standard clinical evaluation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference in the mean length of hospital stay, defined as the number of hours from admission to the internal medicine ward to hospital discharge. A difference of 24 hours was defined as clinically important. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmissions at 30 days and hospital care costs. RESULTS: A total of 250 participants were enrolled and 2 were excluded, leaving 248 participants (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [11.0] years; 121 women [48.7%]) in the final analysis. There were 124 patients in the intervention group and 124 patients in the control group. The most common initial diagnoses were acute decompensated heart failure (113 patients [45.5%]), pneumonia (45 patients [18.1%]), and exacerbated chronic pulmonary disease (32 patients [12.9%]). The length of hospital stay was 113.4 hours (95% CI, 91.7-135.1 hours) in the FCU group and 125.3 hours (95% CI, 101.7-148.8 hours) in the control group (P = .53). The 30-day re

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Circulation (2021) PMID: 34748393 ↗
Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Two-Year Follow-Up of the Australian COPS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Circulation. Key conclusion: (19)Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia (J.L.).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

147. Circulation. 2021 Nov 9;144(19):1584-1586. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054610. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Two-Year Follow-Up of the Australian COPS Randomized Clinical Trial. Tong DC(1)(2), Bloom JE(2)(3)(4), Quinn S(5), Nasis A(6), Hiew C(7), Roberts-Thomson P(8), Adams H(8), Sriamareswaran R(2), Htun NM(2), Wilson W(9), Stub D(3)(10), van Gaal W(11), Howes L(12), Yeap A(2), Yip B(2), Wu S(2), Perera P(2), Collins N(13), Yong A(14), Bhindi R(15), Whitbourn R(1), Lee A(16), Premaratne M(2), Asrress K(17), Freeman M(18), Amerena J(7), Layland J(1)(2)(19). Author information: (1)St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia (D.C.T., R.W., J.L.). (2)Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia (D.C.T., J.E.B., R.S., N.M.H., A. Yeap, B.Y., S.W., P.P., M.P., J.L.). (3)Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (J.E.B., D.S.). (4)The Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (J.E.B.). (5)Swinburne University of Technology, Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia (S.Q.). (6)MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia (A.N.). (7)Barwon Health - University Hospital Geelong, Victoria, Australia (C.H., J.A.). (8)Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia (P.R.-T., H.A.). (9)Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (W.W.). (10)Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia (D.S.). (11)Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia (W.v.G.). (12)Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia (L.H.). (13)John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia (N.C.). (14)Concord Repatriation General Hospital, New South Wales, Australia (A. Yong). (15)Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia (R.B.). (16)Wollongong Hospital, New South Wales, Australia (A.L.). (17)Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, New South Wales, Australia (K.A.). (18).EasternHealth, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia (M.F.). (19)Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia (J.L.). DO

09
CLINICAL STUDY Current drug metabolism (2021) PMID: 34182907 ↗
A Review on Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions of Adrenergic β-blockers with Clinically Relevant Drugs-An Overview.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Clinical Study published in Current drug metabolism. Key conclusion: The plasma concentrations of Propranolol might be elevated by the concomitant use of drugs, such as SSRIs (Fluoxetine, Paroxetine), SNRIs (Duloxetine) and Cimetidine, while the plasma concentrations of Metoprolol increased by the concurrent use of SSRIs (Fluoxetine, Paroxetine),
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Adrenergic β-blockers are used to treat many conditions, including hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, heart failure, angina pectoris, migraine, and tremors. The majority of the β-blockers including Propranolol, Metoprolol, Acebutolol, Alprenolol, Betaxolol, Carvedilol, Nebivolol and Oxprenolol are metabolised majorly by CYP2D6, and Bisoprolol is primarily metabolised by CYP3A4 enzymes. The drugs inhibiting or inducing them may alter the pharmacokinetics of those β-blockers. The plasma concentrations of Propranolol might be elevated by the concomitant use of drugs, such as SSRIs (Fluoxetine, Paroxetine), SNRIs (Duloxetine) and Cimetidine, while the plasma concentrations of Metoprolol increased by the concurrent use of SSRIs (Fluoxetine, Paroxetine), Amiodarone, Celecoxib, Cimetidine, Terbinafine, and Diphenhydramine. β-blockers can also interact pharmacodynamically with drugs, including fluoroquinolones, antidiabetic agents and NSAIDs. In addition, β-blockers may interact with herbs, such as curcumin, Ginkgo biloba, Schisandra chinensis, green tea, guggul, hawthorn, St. John's wort and Yohimbine. This article focuses on clinically relevant drug interactions of β-blockers with commonly prescribed medications. In addition to Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the drug interactions, recommendations for clinical practice are highlighted. The prescribers and the pharmacists are needed to be aware of the drugs interacting with β-blockers to prevent possible adverse drug interactions.

10
CLINICAL STUDY Phytomedicine (2016) PMID: 26656228 ↗
Traditional herbs: a remedy for cardiovascular disorders.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Phytomedicine. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Although the mechanisms of action are not very clear, there is enough evidence of their efficacy in various cardiovascular disorders.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Medicinal plants have been used in patients with congestive heart failure, systolic hypertension, angina pectoris, atherosclerosis, cerebral insufficiency, venous insufficiency and arrhythmia since centuries. A recent increase in the popularity of alternative medicine and natural products has revived interest in traditional remedies that have been used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. AIM: The purpose of this review is to provide updated, comprehensive and categorized information on the history and traditional uses of some herbal medicines that affect the cardiovascular system in order to explore their therapeutic potential and evaluate future research opportunities. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were carried out and the available information on various medicinal plants traditionally used for cardiovascular disorders was collected via electronic search (using Pubmed, SciFinder, Scirus, GoogleScholar, JCCC@INSTIRC and Web of Science) and a library search for articles published in peer-reviewed journals. No restrictions regarding the language of publication were imposed. RESULTS: This article highlights the cardiovascular effects of four potent traditional botanicals viz. Garlic (Allium sativum), Guggul (Commiphora wightii), Hawthorn (Crataegus oxyacantha) and Arjuna (Terminalia arjuna). Although these plants have been used in the treatment of heart disease for hundreds of years, current research methods show us they can be utilized effectively in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias and hypertension. CONCLUSION: Although the mechanisms of action are not very clear, there is enough evidence of their efficacy in various cardiovascular disorders. However, for bringing more objectivity and also to confirm traditional claims, more systematic, well-designed animal and randomized clinical studies with sufficient sample sizes are necessary. Multidisciplinary research is still required to exploit the vast potential of these plants. Potential synergistic and adverse side effects of herb-drug interactions also need to be studied. These approaches will help in estab

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category