NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 2 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Omega-3 (Heart)

CARDIOVASCULAR · Evidence Monograph

Omega-3 (Heart) is an evidence-graded cardiovascular monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (7 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 91,105 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 7 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 91,105
Reported Trial Dosages 4000 mg/day · 1000 mg/day · 650 mg/day
Trial Duration Range 30 days · 3 months · 5 months
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (4000 mg/day · 1000 mg/day · 650 mg/day) over a structured 30 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary cardiovascular clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (22 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (5 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (7 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Omega-3 (Heart) & Why Does Form Matter?

Omega-3 (Heart) is classified under CARDIOVASCULAR and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (4000 mg/day, 1000 mg/day, 650 mg/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Omega-3 (Heart) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Omega-3 (Heart) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Omega-3 (Heart) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 7 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 91,105 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41829906 (2026) — "Forensic Perspective of Unintentional Doping, Cardiovascular Health, and the Role of Nutrition in Competitive Sports." (Nutritional strategies-such as carbohydrate loading, optimized protein intake, omega-3 supplementation, and hydration-improved endurance by 8-12%, reduced resting heart rate by ~3 bpm, and lowered LDL cholesterol.) • PMID:41494879 (2026) — "Omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular risk-related metabolic markers in diverse populations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials." (CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that n-3 PUFAs improve cardiovascular-related metabolic markers, potentially benefit cardiovascular health in patients with cardiovascular disease, PCOS, and kidney disease, especially in older women via reducing TG and HbA1c and increasin) • PMID:40940198 (2026) — "The effectiveness of intervention with omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexenoic acid in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Mixed omega-3 fatty acids, especially in low doses, are not effective in reducing symptoms of PAD.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 40912359-0.72 (-1.31–-0.13)PMID 40355028-0.4 (-0.72–-0.08)PMID 38836663-0.47 (-1.29–0.35)-1.6Null (0)0.6Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 4000 mg/day · 1000 mg/day · 650 mg/day · 1 g/day over 30 days · 3 months · 5 months · 6 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MODERATE] Warfarin: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:15050579). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

• [MODERATE] Aspirin: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:15050579). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (4000 mg/day · 1000 mg/day · 650 mg/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 30 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Warfarin, Aspirin.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 22 Quantitative Analyses

01
CLINICAL STUDY Nutrients (2026) PMID: 41829906 ↗
Forensic Perspective of Unintentional Doping, Cardiovascular Health, and the Role of Nutrition in Competitive Sports.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Nutritional strategies-such as carbohydrate loading, optimized protein intake, omega-3 supplementation, and hydration-improved endurance by 8-12%, reduced resting heart rate by ~3 bpm, and lowered LDL cholesterol.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Unintentional doping, often caused by contaminated supplements or misinterpreted therapeutic prescriptions, poses significant health, ethical, and regulatory challenges in competitive sports. Understanding the cardiovascular risks associated with performance-enhancing substances (PESs) and the preventive role of nutrition requires integrated analysis. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Searches of comprehensive bibliographic databases yielded studies published between 2015 and November 2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed research on doping prevalence, cardiovascular outcomes, nutritional strategies, and supplement regulation. Data extraction focused on prevalence estimates, odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and effect sizes for nutritional interventions. Quality assessment employed GRADE and risk-of-bias tools. From 1320 records screened, 60 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 31 in the meta-analysis. Surveys using indirect questioning estimated that 30-45% of elite athletes may engage in doping, while official anti-doping reports indicated that approximately 20-25% of confirmed rule violations are classified as unintentional. Supplement contamination accounted for 10-15% of unintentional cases. PES use significantly increased cardiovascular risk (HR for arrhythmias and myocardial infarction up to 3.5). Nutritional strategies-such as carbohydrate loading, optimized protein intake, omega-3 supplementation, and hydration-improved endurance by 8-12%, reduced resting heart rate by ~3 bpm, and lowered LDL cholesterol. Unintentional doping remains a major contributor to ADRVs, primarily driven by supplement contamination. Evidence-based nutrition offers safe alternatives to PESs (evidence-based nutritional strategies and structured hydration protocols), enhancing performance and cardiovascular health. Forensic toxicology and pharmacogenomic screening are essential for accurate detection and interpretation. Regulatory reforms, mandatory third-party supplement certification, and athlete education are critical to mitigate unintentional doping and ensure fair competition.

02
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases (2026) PMID: 41494879 ↗
Omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular risk-related metabolic markers in diverse populations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases involving n = 1,491 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that n-3 PUFAs improve cardiovascular-related metabolic markers, potentially benefit cardiovascular health in patients with cardiovascular disease, PCOS, and kidney disease, especially in older women via reducing TG and HbA1c and increasin
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: Many studies reported the effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) towards cardiovascular risk, but results are inconclusive. This meta-analysis systemically explored PUFA-mediated effects on representative cardiovascular-related metabolic markers, including glycolipid profile, adiponectin, and oxidative stress indicators in different people. DATA SYNTHESIS: Literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were performed up to October 11, 2024. Randomized controlled trials focusing on the effects of n-3 PUFA supplementation on triacylglycerol (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol (TC), apolipoprotein, adipokine, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), c-reactive protein (CRP), and oxidative stress biomarkers were chosen as outcome variables. There were 24 studies with 2043 subjects showed significant effects: (1)TG decreased by 16.95 mg/dl (21 trials, n = 1491; 95 % CI: 23.25, -10.66), (2)HDL increased by 1.55 mg/dl (22 trials, n = 1914; 95 % CI: 0.69, 2.42), (3)adiponectin increased by 0.96 μg/ml (3 trials, n = 198; 95 % CI: 0.03, 1.8), (4)HbA1c decreased by 0.17 % (3 trials, n = 283; 95 % CI: 0.29, -0.04), (5)LDL decreased by 10.98 mg/dl in women (4 trials, n = 236; 95 % CI: 19.41, -2.5) and by 13.77 mg/dl in the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (3 trials, n = 180; 95 % CI: 22.83, -4.7), (6)TC decreased by 15.58 mg/dl in women (4 trials, n = 236; 95 % CI: 24.64, -6.53). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that n-3 PUFAs improve cardiovascular-related metabolic markers, potentially benefit cardiovascular health in patients with cardiovascular disease, PCOS, and kidney disease, especially in older women via reducing TG and HbA1c and increasing HDL and adiponectin.

03
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases (2026) PMID: 40940198 ↗
The effectiveness of intervention with omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexenoic acid in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases involving n = 759 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Mixed omega-3 fatty acids, especially in low doses, are not effective in reducing symptoms of PAD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are routinely recommended as a lifestyle modification for preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is not clear if any omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid formulations are favourable for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). DATA SYNTHESIS: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration ID CRD42022336641) was conducted to determine the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on functional outcomes in people with PAD. Studies reporting any dose of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation versus placebo were assessed by two independent reviewers. Data including study design, number, age and sex of participants, period of assessment, diagnosis method for PAD, inclusion and exclusion criteria, method and formulation of omega-3 supplementation were analysed. Risk of bias was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Of 1067 citations, 12 studies (n = 759 patients) met the predefined inclusion criteria. Supplementation of EPA, or EPA + DHA did not alter the primary outcome measures of pain-free walking distance, maximal walking distance; ankle brachial index, or flow mediated vasodilation versus placebo. There were no changes in secondary outcomes of circulating inflammatory markers, cholesterol, or blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Mixed omega-3 fatty acids, especially in low doses, are not effective in reducing symptoms of PAD. However, there is insufficient evidence to rule out effectiveness of specific omega 3 formulations, particularly for high-risk populations. Therefore, it is recommended that a large scale, randomised control trial with high dose EPA is conducted in patients with PAD.

04
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2025) PMID: 40912359 ↗
Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 1,020 participants (SMD -0.72). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Omega-3 supplementation may have benefits for solid organ transplant recipients in terms of improving lipid profiles and reducing blood pressure.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are known for anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular benefits, but their impact on solid organ transplant outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of omega-3 supplementation on clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through May 2025. Eligible studies were evaluated for transplant-related outcomes, with the primary outcome being graft rejection at 30-day, 3-month, and 1-year post-transplant. Secondary outcomes included changes in lipid profile, blood pressure, renal function, and infection rates. RESULTS: Sixteen trials involving 1,020 patients were included. Omega-3 supplementation did not result in a statistically significant reduction in rejection rates at 30 days, 3 months, or 1 year post-transplant. Diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly (Hedges' g = -0.72; 95 % CI: -1.31 to -0.13), and total cholesterol levels also declined (Hedges' g = -0.64; 95 % CI: -1.04 to -0.24), particularly in kidney transplant recipients. In heart transplant recipients, systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (Hedges' g = -1.03; 95 % confidence interval: -1.53 to -0.54). Effects on high- and low-density lipoproteins, triglycerides, glomerular filtration rate, and creatinine clearance were inconsistent and largely non-significant. A single study reported reduced sepsis rates in kidney recipients (log odds ratio = -1.16; 95 % confidence interval: -2.25 to -0.07). No significant impact was seen on calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 supplementation may have benefits for solid organ transplant recipients in terms of improving lipid profiles and reducing blood pressure. However, study heterogeneity and limited outcome data highlight the need for larger, standardized trials.

05
META-ANALYSIS Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) (2025) PMID: 40355028 ↗
Associations between Diet and Cognitive Function in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.); statistical significance reported at p = 0.009 (SMD -0.4). Key conclusion: The substantial heterogeneity among studies hinders conclusions about other dietary strategies.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Poststroke cognitive decline is a major form of disability in stroke survivors. Although dietary interventions have shown potential in improving cognitive outcomes in stroke-free populations, their effects on stroke survivors remain unclear. This review aimed to evaluate associations between diet and cognitive function in stroke survivors. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINHAL were searched for studies from inception to 16 December, 2024. Eligible articles were observational and interventional studies on adult stroke survivors that evaluated the association/effect of any nutritional exposure/intervention on cognitive performance and dementia risk. Studies were excluded when an intervention was combined with nonnutritional treatment. Random-effects meta-analysis was used for similar randomized clinical trials. This review included 20 clinical trials and 14 observational studies assessing the intake of energy and proteins and a variety of single nutrients, as well as dietary patterns, single foods, and phytochemicals. Meta-analyses revealed a positive effect of energy-protein supplementation on global cognition [standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15, 1.08; P = 0.009], and a negative effect of B-vitamins (folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12) (SMD: -0.40; 95% CI: -0.72, -0.08; P = 0.02). Adherence to the Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay and plant-based diets, as well as higher consumption of fruits, milk, coffee, vitamin E, and selenium, were related to better cognitive outcomes; no significant association was observed for adherence to DASH and Mediterranean diets and consumption of vitamins D and C. Butter and sugar intake and calcium supplementation were associated with negative cognitive outcomes. Mixed results were seen for omega (ω)-3, tea, and plant extracts. The available evidence indicates that energy-protein supplementation may benefit cognition after stroke, whereas B-vitamin supplementation has no effect. The substantial heterogeneity among studies hinders conclusions about other dietary strategies. This review was registered with PROSPERO as CRD4

06
META-ANALYSIS Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) (2025) PMID: 39805484 ↗
The Optimal Dosage and Duration of ω-3 PUFA Supplementation in Heart Failure Management: Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) involving n = 9,075 participants. Key conclusion: Further well-designed RCTs with long treatment durations (i.e., >1 y) and stringent heart failure inclusion criteria are necessary to confirm these findings and reduce potential biases.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Heart failure is a progressive condition associated with a high mortality rate. Despite advancements in treatment, many patients continue to experience less-than-ideal outcomes. ω-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been studied as a potential supplementary therapy for heart failure, but the optimal dosage and duration of supplementation remain unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to assess the efficacy of various n-3 PUFA supplementation regimens in patients with heart failure, focusing on dose-dependent and time-dependent effects. We conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on n-3 PUFA supplementation in heart failure till 13 September, 2024. The primary outcome was the change in heart function, specifically left ventricular ejection fraction. Secondary outcomes included changes in peak oxygen consumption (VO2), blood B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations, and quality of life. The safety analysis focused on dropout rates (i.e., patients leaving the study for any reason before completion) and all-cause mortality. A frequentist-based NMA was performed. This NMA, which included 14 RCTs with 9075 participants (mean age, 66.0 y; 23.3% female), found that high-dose n-3 PUFA supplementation (2000-4000 mg/d) over a duration of ≥1 y significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction and peak VO2 compared with those of control groups. Lower doses and shorter treatment periods did not produce the same benefits. No significant differences were found in dropout rates or all-cause mortality between the n-3 PUFAs and control groups. Long-term, high-dose n-3 PUFA supplementation, particularly with a predominance of docosahexaenoic acid or eicosapentaenoic acid, enhances cardiac function in patients with heart failure without increasing risk of adverse events. Further well-designed RCTs with long treatment durations (i.e., >1 y) and stringent heart failure inclusion criteria are necessary to confirm these findings and reduce potential biases. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42024590476.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Progress in cardiovascular diseases (2025) PMID: 39617283 ↗
Omega-3 and Risk of atrial fibrillation: Vagally-mediated double-edged sword.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Progress in cardiovascular diseases involving n = 54,799 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0002. Key conclusion: In contrast, pharmaceutical dosing of omega-3 increases AF in a dose-dependent manner, which may be mediated by vagal tone.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Studies regarding effects of omega-3 fatty acids, specifically eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) have reported discordant results. The aim of this review is to clarify effects of marine omega-3 intake on risk of AF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A PubMed search was performed using terms: atrial fibrillation, omega-3, EPA, DHA, vagal tone. We summarized findings from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), epidemiology studies, and meta-analyses evaluating effects/associations of DHA + EPA on risk of AF. Also, vagal tone was explored as a mediator between omega-3 and risk of AF. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of 8 RCTs and 17 prospective cohort studies comprised of 83,112 and 54,799 individuals, respectively, investigated the link between omega-3 intake and incident AF. The RCTs reported that treatment with DHA and/or EPA was associated with a 24 % increased relative risk of AF (absolute risk 4.0 % vs 3.3 %; relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.38, p = 0.0002). This was dose-dependent; DHA + EPA doses of ∼1000 mg/d increased AF risk ∼12 %, whereas 1800 to 4000 mg/d increased AF risk by ∼50 %. In contrast, observational studies focused on DHA + EPA blood levels or dietary intake have generally reported that higher omega-3 levels/consumption are associated with lower AF risk. Maximal AF risk reduction. (12 %) occurred at ∼650 mg/d of dietary DHA + EPA. Other studies have indicated that omega-3 fatty acids can dose-dependently increase vagal tone, which could explain the biphasic relationship between DHA + EPA and AF risk. Experimental studies show that low-level vagal stimulation decreases risk of AF, whereas high-level vagal stimulation increases risk of AF. CONCLUSION: Higher consumption of dietary omega-3 is associated with decreased AF risk. In contrast, pharmaceutical dosing of omega-3 increases AF in a dose-dependent manner, which may be mediated by vagal tone.

08
CLINICAL STUDY Nutrients (2024) PMID: 38892543 ↗
Circulating Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Levels in Coronary Heart Disease: Pooled Analysis of 36 Observational Studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: n-3 PUFAs are significantly related to CHD risk, and these findings support the beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs on CHD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation has shown potential benefits in the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD); however, the impact of omega-3 fatty acid levels on CHD risk remains a subject of debate. Here, we aimed to investigate the association between n-3 PUFA levels and the risk of CHD, with particular reference to the subtypes of n-3 PUFA. METHODS: Prospective studies and retrospective case-control studies analyzing n-3 PUFA levels in CHD, published up to 30 July 2022, were selected. A random effects meta-analysis was used for pooled assessment, with relative risks (RRs) expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and standardized mean differences expressed as weight mean differences (WMDs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of n-3 PUFA exposure interval on the CHD subtype variables of the study. RESULTS: We included 20 prospective studies (cohort and nested case-control) and 16 retrospective case-control studies, in which n-3 PUFAs were measured. Higher levels of n-3 PUFAs (ALA, EPA, DPA, DHA, EPA + DHA, total n-3 PUFAs) were associated with a reduced risk of CHD, with RRs (95% CI) of 0.89 (0.81, 0.98), 0.83 (0.72, 0.96); 0.80 (0.67,0.95), 0.75 (0.64, 0.87), 0.83 (0.73, 0.95), and 0.80 (0.70, 0.93), respectively, p < 0.05. CHD patients had significantly lower n-3 PUFA levels compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, a significant inverse trend was found for both fatal CHD and non-fatal CHD with n-3 PUFA (EPA + DHA) levels. Also, the link between n-3 PUFA levels in erythrocytes with total CHD was generally stronger than other lipid pools. CONCLUSIONS: n-3 PUFAs are significantly related to CHD risk, and these findings support the beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs on CHD.

09
META-ANALYSIS European journal of preventive cardiology (2024) PMID: 38869144 ↗
Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on coronary revascularization and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of preventive cardiology involving n = 52 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: secondary prevention and the potential benefits of reduced revascularizations on overall health status and cost savings warrant further research.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: Benefits of pharmacologic omega-3 fatty acid administration in cardiovascular prevention are controversial. Particularly, effects on coronary revascularization are unclear; also debated are specific benefits of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). We investigated incident coronary revascularizations, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), unstable angina, and cardiovascular death, in subjects randomized to receive EPA or EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (EPA + DHA) vs. control. METHODS AND RESULTS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted after MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library search. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Eighteen RCTs with 134 144 participants (primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention) receiving DHA + EPA (n = 52 498), EPA alone (n = 14 640), or control/placebo (n = 67 006) were included. Follow-up ranged from 4.5 months to 7.4 years. Overall, compared with controls, omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of revascularization [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.98; P = 0.001; P-heterogeneity = 0.0002; I2 = 68%], MI (0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.06; I2 = 41%), and cardiovascular death (0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.13; I2 = 33%). Lower risk was still observed in trials where most participants (≥60%) were on statin therapy. Compared with DHA + EPA, EPA alone showed a further significant risk reduction of revascularizations (0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0002; P-interaction = 0.005) and all outcomes except HF. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduced the risk of cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization, regardless of background statin use. Eicosapentaenoic acid alone produced greater benefits. The role of specific omega-3 molecules in primary vs. secondary prevention and the potential benefits of reduced revascularizations on overall health status and cost savings warrant further research. Plain Language Summary: It is debated whether

10
META-ANALYSIS Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France) (2024) PMID: 38836663 ↗
Effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on markers of inflammation and endothelial function in patients with chronic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France) involving n = 853 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (SMD -0.47). Key conclusion: Also, findings revealed that a daily supplement of omega-3 significantly increased FMD by 0.34% (95% CI: 0.14-0.54%, p < 0.001) as compared with placebo by a fixed-effect model in patients with CHD.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Chronic heart disease (CHD) is still a major global cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating effective therapeutic interventions to mitigate its progression. Omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) have garnered attention for their potential anti-inflammatory and endothelial-protective properties in CHD management. The present study aims to assess the efficacy of Omega-3 FA supplementation on markers of inflammation and endothelial function in patients with CHD. To achieve this, we used the relevant keywords to search international databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) and extract publications evaluating the effectiveness of omega-3 FA supplementation on inflammation markers and endothelial function in patients with CHD. STATA (version 15) and the random and fixed-effects models were used to evaluate the collected data. Thirteen clinical trial studies met inclusion criteria, with a total sample size of 853 individuals (406 cases and 447 controls). The cases had a mean age of 58 ± 10.3 years. The pooled results indicated that omega-3 Omega-3 FA supplementation significantly reduced the level of circulating IL-6 (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.35, %, p < 0.001), hs-CRP (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.28, p = 0.01), and TNF-α (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI -1.14 to 0.01, p < 0.001) in patients with CHD. Also, findings revealed that a daily supplement of omega-3 significantly increased FMD by 0.34% (95% CI: 0.14-0.54%, p < 0.001) as compared with placebo by a fixed-effect model in patients with CHD. These findings underscore the potential therapeutic utility of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in modulating inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with CHD.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category