NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Potassium (Blood Pressure)

CARDIOVASCULAR · Evidence Monograph

Potassium (Blood Pressure) is an evidence-graded cardiovascular monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 9,584 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 10 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 9,584
Reported Trial Dosages 360 mg/day · 4g/day · 2.5 g/day
Trial Duration Range 3 months · 1 months · 4 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (360 mg/day · 4g/day · 2.5 g/day) over a structured 3 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary cardiovascular clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (19 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (5 RCTs · 6 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (10 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Potassium (Blood Pressure) & Why Does Form Matter?

Potassium (Blood Pressure) is classified under CARDIOVASCULAR and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (360 mg/day, 4g/day, 2.5 g/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Potassium (Blood Pressure) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Potassium (Blood Pressure) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Potassium (Blood Pressure) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 10 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 9,584 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39519450 (2024) — "Magnesium and Potassium Supplementation for Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction in the General Normotensive Population: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-Analysis for Optimal Dosage and Treatment Length." (CONCLUSIONS: Both supplements demonstrated greater reductions in SBP for the general population at lower dosages and longer treatment durations.) • PMID:38780173 (2024) — "Effects of potassium supplementation on plasma aldosterone: a systematic review and meta-analysis in humans." (CONCLUSIONS: Potassium supplementation increases plasma aldosterone concentrations, which correlates with the increase in serum potassium concentration which does not appear to be mediated by an increase in plasma renin activity.) • PMID:37836507 (2023) — "Vitamins and Minerals for Blood Pressure Reduction in the General, Normotensive Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Six Supplements." (Vitamins C and D were not found to significantly lower either SBP or DBP.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 360 mg/day · 4g/day · 2.5 g/day · 4.7 g/day over 3 months · 1 months · 4 weeks · 6 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MAJOR] ACE Inhibitor (lisinopril ): Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (DrugBank:DB00722). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (360 mg/day · 4g/day · 2.5 g/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 3 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking ACE Inhibitor (lisinopril ).
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 19 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2024) PMID: 39519450 ↗
Magnesium and Potassium Supplementation for Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction in the General Normotensive Population: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-Analysis for Optimal Dosage and Treatment Length.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Both supplements demonstrated greater reductions in SBP for the general population at lower dosages and longer treatment durations.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown that consistent reductions of 2 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure (SBP) for the general normotensive population can result in significant decreases in mortality from heart disease and stroke. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the optimal dose and duration of treatment for magnesium and potassium supplementation, having previously discovered that both reduce SBP by -2.79 and -2.10 mm Hg, respectively. METHODS: Placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials examining the effects of magnesium and potassium supplementation on SBP were identified. Pairwise meta-analyses with subgroups for dosage and treatment duration were run. RESULTS: Magnesium at dosages of ≤360 mg/day and durations greater than 3 months reduced SBP by -3.03 and -4.31 mm Hg, respectively. Potassium at dosages of ≤60 mmol/day and durations greater than 1 month reduced SBP by -2.34 and -2.80 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both supplements demonstrated greater reductions in SBP for the general population at lower dosages and longer treatment durations. Future studies are needed to validate these findings and provide tailored recommendations. These studies could investigate varying dosages over long-term follow-up to provide robust data on optimal dosages and treatment durations, as our findings were limited due to reliance on previously published trials.

02
META-ANALYSIS Journal of hypertension (2024) PMID: 38780173 ↗
Effects of potassium supplementation on plasma aldosterone: a systematic review and meta-analysis in humans.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of hypertension; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Potassium supplementation increases plasma aldosterone concentrations, which correlates with the increase in serum potassium concentration which does not appear to be mediated by an increase in plasma renin activity.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: Effects of potassium supplementation on blood pressure (BP) may be offset by an increase in plasma aldosterone. The magnitude of potassium-dependent regulation of aldosterone secretion in humans is not fully characterized; it is not clear whether this is mediated by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), as a result of a reduction in BP or other mechanisms. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials assessing effects of potassium on plasma aldosterone and renin in adult individuals. METHODS: This was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL. Titles were firstly screened by title and abstract for relevance before full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The keywords used included "aldosterone", "potassium" and "RAAS". RESULTS: 6395 articles were retrieved and after title/abstract screening, 123 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Thirty-six met the prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria (of which 18/36 also reported systolic BP). Potassium supplementation caused a significant decrease in systolic BP (mean difference [95% CI] -3.69 mmHg [-4.91, -2.46], P < 0.001) and increase in serum potassium (+0.37 [0.23, 0.52] mmol/l, P < 0.001). There was an increase in plasma aldosterone (standardized difference 0.426 [0.299, 0.553], P < 0.001) but not in plasma renin activity. Meta-regression showed a significant positive correlation between change in plasma aldosterone and change in serum potassium ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Potassium supplementation increases plasma aldosterone concentrations, which correlates with the increase in serum potassium concentration which does not appear to be mediated by an increase in plasma renin activity.

03
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37836507 ↗
Vitamins and Minerals for Blood Pressure Reduction in the General, Normotensive Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Six Supplements.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Vitamins C and D were not found to significantly lower either SBP or DBP.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Hypertension is the leading preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality worldwide. However, studies have shown increased risk of mortality from heart disease and stroke even within the normal blood pressure (BP) range, starting at BPs above 110-115/70-75 mm Hg. Nutraceuticals, such as vitamins and minerals, have been studied extensively for their efficacy in lowering BP and may be of benefit to the general, normotensive population in achieving optimal BP. Our study investigated the effects of six nutraceuticals (Vitamins: C, D, E; Minerals: Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium) on both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in this population. We performed a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis for all six supplements versus placebo. Calcium and magnesium achieved significant reductions in both SBP and DBP of -1.37/-1.63 mm Hg and -2.79/-1.56 mm Hg, respectively. Vitamin E and potassium only yielded significant reductions in SBP with values of -1.76 mm Hg and -2.10 mm Hg, respectively. Vitamins C and D were not found to significantly lower either SBP or DBP. Future studies should determine optimal dosage and treatment length for these supplements in the general, normotensive population.

04
META-ANALYSIS Journal of human hypertension (2021) PMID: 33674705 ↗
The impact of baseline potassium intake on the dose-response relation between sodium reduction and blood pressure change: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of human hypertension involving n = 5,708 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: A higher starting level of blood pressure was consistently associated with a greater blood pressure reduction from reduced sodium consumption.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Sodium and potassium appear to interact with each other in their effects on blood pressure with potassium supplementation having a greater blood pressure lowering-effect when sodium intake is high. Whether the effect of sodium reduction on blood pressure varies according to potassium intake levels is unclear. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of baseline potassium intake on blood pressure response to sodium reduction in randomized trials in adult populations, with sodium and potassium intake estimated from 24-h urine samples. We included 68 studies involving 5708 participants and conducted univariable and multivariable meta-regression. The median intake of baseline potassium was 67.7 mmol (Interquartile range: 54.6-76.4 mmol), and the mean reduction in sodium intake was 128 mmol (95% CI: 107-148). Multivariable meta-regression that included baseline 24-h urinary potassium excretion, age, ethnicity, baseline blood pressure, change in 24-h urinary sodium excretion, as well as the interaction between baseline 24-h urinary potassium excretion and change in 24-h urinary sodium excretion did not identify a significant association of baseline potassium intake levels with the blood pressure reduction achieved with a 50 mmol lowering of sodium intake (p > 0.05 for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure). A higher starting level of blood pressure was consistently associated with a greater blood pressure reduction from reduced sodium consumption. However, the nonsignificant findings may subject to the limitations of the data available. Additional studies with more varied potassium intake levels would allow a more confident exclusion of an interaction. © 2021. Crown.

05
META-ANALYSIS Journal of the American Heart Association (2020) PMID: 32500831 ↗
Potassium Intake and Blood Pressure: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of the American Heart Association. Key conclusion: Conclusions We identified a nonlinear relationship between potassium intake and both systolic and diastolic BP, although estimates for BP effects of high potassium intakes should be interpreted with caution because of limited availability of trials.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background Epidemiologic studies, including trials, suggest an association between potassium intake and blood pressure (BP). However, the strength and shape of this relationship is uncertain. Methods and Results We performed a meta-analysis to explore the dose-response relationship between potassium supplementation and BP in randomized-controlled trials with a duration ≥4 weeks using the recently developed 1-stage cubic spline regression model. This model allows use of trials with at least 2 exposure categories. We identified 32 eligible trials. Most were conducted in adults with hypertension using a crossover design and potassium supplementation doses that ranged from 30 to 140 mmol/d. We observed a U-shaped relationship between 24-hour active and control arm differences in potassium excretion and BP levels, with weakening of the BP reduction effect above differences of 30 mmol/d and a BP increase above differences ≈80 mmol/d. Achieved potassium excretion analysis also identified a U-shaped relationship. The BP-lowering effects of potassium supplementation were stronger in participants with hypertension and at higher levels of sodium intake. The BP increase with high potassium excretion was noted in participants with antihypertensive drug-treated hypertension but not in their untreated counterparts. Conclusions We identified a nonlinear relationship between potassium intake and both systolic and diastolic BP, although estimates for BP effects of high potassium intakes should be interpreted with caution because of limited availability of trials. Our findings indicate an adequate intake of potassium is desirable to achieve a lower BP level but suggest excessive potassium supplementation should be avoided, particularly in specific subgroups.

06
META-ANALYSIS International journal of epidemiology (2018) PMID: 29955869 ↗
Sodium intake and blood pressure in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of epidemiology involving n = 531 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Sodium intake is positively associated with blood pressure in children and adolescents, with consistent findings in experimental and observational studies.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: High sodium intake is a cause of elevated blood pressure in adults. In children and adolescents, less evidence is available and findings are equivocal. We systematically reviewed the evidence from experimental and observational studies on the association between sodium intake and blood pressure in children and adolescents. METHODS: A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, CINAHL and CENTRAL databases up to March 2017 was conducted and supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies and unpublished studies. Experimental and observational studies involving children or adolescents between 0 and 18 years of age were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed by pooling data across all studies, separately for experimental and observational studies, and restricting to studies with sodium intake and blood pressure measurement methods of high quality. Subgroup meta-analyses, sensitivity analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to investigate sources of heterogeneity and confounding. The dose-response relationship was also investigated. RESULTS: Of the 6572 publications identified, 85 studies (14 experimental; 71 observational, including 60 cross-sectional, 6 cohort and 5 case-control studies) with 58 531 participants were included. In experimental studies, sodium reduction interventions decreased systolic blood pressure by 0.6 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5, 0.8] and diastolic blood pressure by 1.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.4, 1.9). The meta-analysis of 18 experimental and observational studies (including 3406 participants) with sodium intake and blood pressure measurement methods of high quality showed that, for every additional gram of sodium intake per day, systolic blood pressure increased by 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.4, 1.3) and diastolic blood pressure by 0.7 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.0, 1.4). The association was stronger among children with overweight and with low potassium intake. A quasi-linear relationship was found between sodium intake and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium intake is positively associated with blood pressure in children and adolescents, with consistent findings in experimental and observational studies. Since blood pressu

07
META-ANALYSIS PloS one (2017) PMID: 28419159 ↗
Oral potassium supplementation for management of essential hypertension: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Meta-Analysis published in PloS one involving n = 1,213 participants (MD -4.25). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that potassium supplementation is a safe medication with no important adverse effects that has a modest but significant impact BP and may be recommended as an adjuvant antihypertensive agent for patients with essential hypertension.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

IMPORTANCE: Increased dietary potassium intake is thought to be associated with low blood pressure (BP). Whether potassium supplementation may be used as an antihypertensive agent is a question that should be answered. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of oral potassium supplementation on blood pressure in patients with primary hypertension. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until October 2016. We also screened reference lists of articles and previous reviews. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials addressing the effect of potassium supplementation on primary hypertension for a minimum of 4 weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at the final follow-up. We explored the heterogeneity across studies using Cochran's test and I2 statistic and assessed the probability of publication bias using Begg's and Egger's tests. We reported the mean difference (MD) of SBP and DBP in a random-effects model. RESULTS: We found a total of 9059 articles and included 23 trials with 1213 participants. Compared to placebo, potassium supplementation resulted in modest but significant reductions in both SBP (MD -4.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -5.96 to -2.53; I2 = 41%) and DBP (MD -2.53 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.05 to -1.02; I2 = 65%). According to the change-score analysis, based on 8 out of 23 trials, compared to baseline, the mean changes in SBP (MD -8.89 mmHg; 95% CI: -13.67 to -4.11) and DBP (MD -6.42 mmHg; 95% CI: -10.99 to -1.84) was significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that potassium supplementation is a safe medication with no important adverse effects that has a modest but significant impact BP and may be recommended as an adjuvant antihypertensive agent for patients with essential hypertension.

08
META-ANALYSIS International journal of cardiology (2017) PMID: 28024910 ↗
The effect of potassium supplementation on blood pressure in hypertensive subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of cardiology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Potassium supplementation in hypertensives was generally associated with decreased blood pressure, particularly in high sodium consumers, subjects not on hypertensive drug treatment, and those in the lowest category of potassium intake.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Several intervention studies have investigated the relation between potassium intake and blood-pressure, particularly in hypertensive subjects. However, uncertainties still exist about the existence and the amount of such an effect, and about the role of some potential effect-modifiers, including the baseline potassium intake and geographical area. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of the evidence concerning such relation in hypertensive subjects, performing a meta-analysis and a meta-regression of RCT with selective and validated long-term (≥4weeks) potassium supplementation. We also implemented 'unconventional' search strategies in order to identify all potentially interesting studies. RESULTS: Overall, potassium supplementation decreased systolic blood pressure of 4.48mmHg (95% CI 3.07-5.90) and diastolic blood pressure of 2.96mmHg (1.10-4.82). There was little evidence of dose-response relation between blood-pressure decrease and potassium supplementation, as assessed through total achieved potassium intake in the intervention groups, difference in achieved potassium intake, and study duration. However, lower (<90mmol/day) potassium intake at baseline was associated with a higher blood-pressure lowering effect, as were higher sodium intake (particularly ≥4g/day), higher sodium-to-potassium ratio and the absence of any anti-hypertensive drug treatment. Trials conducted in Southern Europe showed the highest blood-pressure lowering effect compared with the remaining regions. CONCLUSIONS: Potassium supplementation in hypertensives was generally associated with decreased blood pressure, particularly in high sodium consumers, subjects not on hypertensive drug treatment, and those in the lowest category of potassium intake. An adequate dietary intake of potassium, in the order of 90mmol/day, should be achieved for blood pressure control.

09
META-ANALYSIS International journal of cardiology (2017) PMID: 27865190 ↗
Effect of potassium supplementation on vascular function: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of cardiology involving n = 409 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01 (SMD -0.28). Key conclusion: However, the small number of researches and wide variation of evidences make it difficult to make a definitive conclusion.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Effects of potassium supplementation on vascular function remain conflicting. This meta-analysis aimed to summarized current literature to fill the gaps in knowledge. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed database through April, 2016. The measurements of vascular function included pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AI), pulse pressure (PP), flow mediated dilatation (FMD), glycerol trinitrate responses (GTN), and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Data were pooled as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials examining 409 participants were included, with dosage of potassium ranging from 40 to 150mmol/day, and duration of intervention from 6days to 12months. Pooling results revealed a significant improvement in PP (SMD -0.280, 95% CI -0.493 to -0.067, p=0.010), but no improvement in PWV (SMD -0.342, 95% CI -1.123 to 0·440, p=0.391), AI (SMD -0.114, 95% CI -0.282 to 0.054, p=0.184), FMD (SMD 0·278, 95% CI -0.321 to 0.877, p=0.363), GTN (SMD -0.009, 95% CI -0.949 to 0.930, p=0.984), and ICAM-1 (SMD -0.238, 95% CI -0.720 to 0.244, p=0.333). CONCLUSIONS: Potassium supplementation was associated with significant improvement of PP, rather than other measurements of vascular function. However, the small number of researches and wide variation of evidences make it difficult to make a definitive conclusion.

10
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases (2016) PMID: 27289164 ↗
Potassium supplementation and heart rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases involving n = 1,086 participants (HR 0.19). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: A chronic increase in potassium intake with supplemental doses of 2-3 g/day is unlikely to affect HR in apparently healthy adults.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increasing the intake of potassium has been shown to lower blood pressure, but whether it also affects heart rate (HR) is largely unknown. We therefore assessed the effect of potassium supplementation on HR in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched PubMed (1966-October 2014) for randomized, placebo-controlled trials in healthy adults with a minimum duration of two weeks in which the effect of increased potassium intake on HR was assessed. In addition, reference lists from meta-analysis papers on potassium and blood pressure were hand-searched for publications. Two investigators independently extracted the data. We performed random effects meta-analyses, subgroup and meta-regression analyses for characteristics of the study (e.g. design, intervention duration, potassium dose and salt type, change in potassium excretion, sodium excretion during intervention) and study population (e.g. gender, age, hypertensive status, pre-study HR, pre-study potassium excretion). A total of 22 trials (1086 subjects), with a median potassium dose of 2.5 g/day (range: 0.9-4.7 g/day), and median intervention duration of 4 weeks (range: 2-24 weeks) were included. The meta-analysis showed no overall effect of increased potassium intake on HR (0.19 bpm, 95% CI: -0.44, 0.82). Stratified analyses yielded no significant effects of potassium intake on HR in subgroups, and there was no evidence for a dose-response relationship in meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSION: A chronic increase in potassium intake with supplemental doses of 2-3 g/day is unlikely to affect HR in apparently healthy adults.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category