NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa)

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 0 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 1,719 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 7 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 0 RCTs (1 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 1,719
Reported Trial Dosages 0.14 mg · 1 g · 12 g
Trial Duration Range 6 weeks · 8 months · 90 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (0.14 mg · 1 g · 12 g) over a structured 6 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (11 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (0 RCTs · 1 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 7 reviews)
01

What Is Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) & Why Does Form Matter?

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (0.14 mg, 1 g, 12 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (0 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 0 randomized controlled trials (1 double-blind, n = 1,719 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41592275 (2026) — "Kratom use in adolescents and college students: a systematic review of prevalence, patterns, and risk factors across community and rehabilitation settings." (While kratom may hold potential as a harm reduction tool, evidence on its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes remain limited, highlighting the importance of distinguishing traditional practices from emerging recreational trends.) • PMID:41170377 (2025) — "Reported associations between kratom and seizures: a systematic review." (These databases were selected to examine consumer-reported and healthcare-reported adverse event, providing a comprehensive list of seizure-related incidents potentially associated with kratom use.) • PMID:40606596 (2025) — "The effects of kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) on metabolic syndrome-related parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (However, the total cholesterol and blood sugar lowering effects were not statistically significant.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 0.14 mg · 1 g · 12 g · 3 g over 6 weeks · 8 months · 90 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (0.14 mg · 1 g · 12 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 6 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 11 Quantitative Analyses

01
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse (2026) PMID: 41592275 ↗
Kratom use in adolescents and college students: a systematic review of prevalence, patterns, and risk factors across community and rehabilitation settings.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse. Key conclusion: While kratom may hold potential as a harm reduction tool, evidence on its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes remain limited, highlighting the importance of distinguishing traditional practices from emerging recreational trends.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa), a Southeast Asian plant, has gained global prominence for its pharmacological properties and widespread use, particularly among vulnerable adolescents and youth, raising concerns about its impact.Objective: We reviewed existing studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of kratom use among adolescents and college students.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies published up to October 2024, using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Search terms included "Kratom" or "Mitragyna speciosa" combined with terms related to adolescents and college students.Results: Six eligible studies conducted in Malaysia, Thailand, and the United States were identified. Distinct regional differences in patterns of kratom use were observed, shaped by cultural traditions in Southeast Asia and commercialization in the United States. Kratom use was more prevalent among males across regions, with variations shaped by socioeconomic status, psychosocial influences and recreational use. Available studies were limited to college students and those enrolled in a drug treatment program (one study). Generally, kratom was commonly used to self-manage withdrawal symptoms from opioids (heroin) and methamphetamines. Polydrug use emerged as a consistent theme across all studies, underscoring the complexity of kratom consumption in this population.Conclusion: The rising prevalence of kratom use among adolescents and college students demands attention. While kratom may hold potential as a harm reduction tool, evidence on its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes remain limited, highlighting the importance of distinguishing traditional practices from emerging recreational trends. This review points the need for targeted interventions, education, and regulatory frameworks.

02
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Frontiers in pharmacology (2025) PMID: 41170377 ↗
Reported associations between kratom and seizures: a systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Frontiers in pharmacology involving n = 20 participants. Key conclusion: These databases were selected to examine consumer-reported and healthcare-reported adverse event, providing a comprehensive list of seizure-related incidents potentially associated with kratom use.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE INNOVATION OR HYPOTHESIS: Kratom, derived from the leaves of the plant Mitragyna speciosa, is an herbal supplement that has been used medically and recreationally for centuries, but has recently gained popularity in the United States for its analgesic and euphoric effects. The United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has issued warnings against the use kratom due to potential health effects, including seizures. Seizures are one of the most commonly reported side effects associated with kratom use. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether there is a causal relationship between kratom use and seizures. DESCRIPTION OF METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify reviewed articles that contained information or data on kratom users experiencing seizures. Additionally, we mined adverse event data submitted to the Centers for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition's Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS) database and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). These databases were selected to examine consumer-reported and healthcare-reported adverse event, providing a comprehensive list of seizure-related incidents potentially associated with kratom use. DATA AND RESULTS: Our search yielded a total of 42 articles, but only 11 met the selection criteria for inclusion. The 11 peer-reviewed articles included for analysis consisted of case reports (n = 6), case series (n = 2), retrospective observational (n = 2), and a paper discussing a summary of adverse events reported to the FAERS database. Across the 11 publications used in our analysis, we noted a total of 20 patients who reportedly experienced seizures after using kratom. However, only one patient was quantitatively positive for Mitragynine in their urine sample, so there was minimal proof of kratom use. There was no indication that the other 19 patients had their urine subjected to mitragynine screening which would have confirmed their use of kratom and internal metabolism after intake. Furthermore, the FAERS dashboard, only 22 of 481 kratom-related reports involved seizure (4.5%); the CAERS database had 18 reported seizures amongst 221,1

03
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in pharmacology (2025) PMID: 40606596 ↗
The effects of kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) on metabolic syndrome-related parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in pharmacology involving n = 1,458 participants (MD -0.25). Key conclusion: However, the total cholesterol and blood sugar lowering effects were not statistically significant.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Mitragyna speciosa Korth. [Rubiaceae] is a tropical plant with opioid-like properties used for its metabolic altering effects, but data on the metabolic effects are lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the effects of kratom use on parameters related to metabolic syndrome (MetS) in humans. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to 6 September 2024 to identify eligible analytical studies examining the association between kratom consumption and metabolic effects. The effect estimates were summarized as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: Five cross-sectional studies were included. The meta-analysis involving 1,458 adults observed significantly lower levels of serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (MD -0.25-0.21 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.39, -0.02), triglyceride (MD -0.17 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.25, -0.09), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) levels increased (MD 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.11). Body mass index was also lower in adults using kratom when compared to the control group (MD -1.52 kg/m2; 95% CI: -2.81, -0.23). CONCLUSION: Kratom use in the adult population was associated with lower LDL-c, TG, BMI, and higher HDL-c levels. However, the total cholesterol and blood sugar lowering effects were not statistically significant. The findings suggest that kratom use may have a protective effect against certain metabolic risk factors. Further investigations particularly longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: identifier CRD42024600702.

04
META-ANALYSIS European addiction research (2024) PMID: 38889703 ↗
Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) Use and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in European addiction research; statistical significance reported at p = 0.003. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis supports the kratom instrumentalization concept, in that a positive gain from kratom consumption can be achieved without any significant adverse associations with mental health.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a medicinal tree native to Southeast Asia. The present multilevel meta-analysis describes the association between kratom use and the positive and negative indicators of mental health. METHODS: A total of thirty-six articles were included in the meta-analysis to examine the associations, using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The pooled effect size showed a very small positive association between kratom use and negative indicators of mental health {r = 0.092, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.020, 0.164], p < 0.05}, while no significant association was found with positive indicators of mental health (r = -0.031, 95% CI = [-0.149, 0.087], p > 0.05). Pooled effect sizes of specific mental health outcomes indicated that kratom use showed only a small positive correlation with externalizing disorders (r = 0.201, 95% CI = [0.107, 0.300], p < 0.001). No significant association was found between kratom use and quality of life (r = 0.069, 95% CI = [-0.104, 0.242], p > 0.05) and internalizing disorders (r = -0.001, 95% CI = [-0.115, 0.095], p > 0.05). Multilevel moderator analysis showed that the pooled effect size of the association between kratom use and substance use disorder was stronger in Malaysia (r = 0.347, 95% CI = [0.209, 0.516], p < 0.001), and with the mean age (β1 = -0.035, 95% CI = [-0.055, -0.014], p = 0.003), and the drug profile of those who were not co-using other drugs (r = 0.347, 95% CI = [0.209, 0.516], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis supports the kratom instrumentalization concept, in that a positive gain from kratom consumption can be achieved without any significant adverse associations with mental health. © 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.

05
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of addictive diseases (2024) PMID: 37942896 ↗
Kratom use and mental health: A systematic literature review and case example.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Clinical Study published in Journal of addictive diseases involving n = 10 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Our research highlights the possibility of worsening preexisting psychiatric conditions in the context of kratom use.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the existing literature on kratom use and its possible association with induction of psychotic and manic symptoms, in order to identify potential areas for future research that would improve our understanding of the risks of kratom consumption. METHODS: An electronic search was performed using five major databases: including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. keywords such as kratom, Mitragyna speciosa, mania, psychosis, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, case report, and case series. The retrieved articles on initial search were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study, and then data synthesis was performed to analyze relevant information from the included studies. RESULTS: Six prior papers were found using (1 case series and 5 case reports). These included 10 cases, involving kratom use association with mania and psychosis. The ages of patients ranged from 28 to 55 years mean age was 38, and (SD 13.74), the majority were males (8 out of 11). Patients had durations of kratom use ranging from 2 wk to 15 years. Significant association was found between kratom use and the worsening of psychotic and manic symptoms in individuals with psychiatric conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our research highlights the possibility of worsening preexisting psychiatric conditions in the context of kratom use. This study emphasizes the need for clinical evaluation of patients for kratom use. Additional research is required to gain a deeper understanding of the potential mental health implications of kratom use, especially among vulnerable populations.

06
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse (2022) PMID: 36001875 ↗
Kratom as an opioid alternative: harm, or harm reduction? A systematic review of literature.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Systematic Review published in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse. Key conclusion: Case reports and observational studies carry significant bias toward harm and efficacy, respectively.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa Korth.) products are increasingly endorsed for self-management of multiple ailments, including as opioid substitution. The FDA has expressed that there is no evidence to indicate that this botanical is safe or effective for any medical use.Objective: We systematically review the current state of the literature concerning the impact of kratom and its alkaloids in all paradigms that involve opioids.Methods: A keyword search of online literature databases identified 16 preclinical studies, 25 case reports, and 10 observational studies meeting our pre-selected criteria.Results: All rodent models support alkaloids' action on opioid receptors, translating in their ability to mitigate opioid withdrawal. Some studies found mitragynine (MG) to have less reinforcing properties than morphine, and possessing tolerance-sparing properties when coadministered with morphine. Two studies that assessed 7-hydroxymitragynine (7OHMG) found it to substitute for morphine with potential for tolerance and dependence. Aside from addiction development, case reports outline a variety of confounding toxicities. Ten surveys of users, some conducted with assistance from pro-kratom lobbying organizations, find a high self-reported efficacy as an opioid substitute, with minimal reported adverse effects.Conclusion: With no reported controlled human clinical trials, in the light of rising concerns surrounding kratom's liabilities, there is insufficient evidence to allow any conclusions to be drawn. Case reports and observational studies carry significant bias toward harm and efficacy, respectively. Existing animal studies are heterogeneous in methodology and ultimately findings, with concern for interspecies variability and human translatability. Further research should investigate the safety and efficacy of using kratom alkaloids as opioid substitutes.

07
CLINICAL STUDY The International journal on drug policy (2022) PMID: 35952436 ↗
Qualitative content analysis of public responses to an FDA inquiry on the impact of scheduling changes to kratom.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Systematic Review published in The International journal on drug policy. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Although kratom is not approved as a safe and effective therapy for any indication, individuals use kratom for a broad spectrum of health-related purposes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The legal status of kratom in the United States is complex and varies by state. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration have repeatedly subjected kratom to regulatory review. However, there hasn't been a systematic review of the public's perception of kratom. The present study analyzed open-ended responses from the public to an FDA solicitation for information regarding kratom with the goal of providing a comprehensive assessment of motives for kratom use. METHODS: To guide decisions regarding kratom regulation, the FDA solicited comments regarding kratom abuse potential, medical usefulness, and impact of scheduling changes from July through August 2021 and posted them to the Federal Register website. We analyzed comments posted during the first 6 weeks of comment solicitation (6,353) using an inductive approach via qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Respondents reported 106 independent health-related reasons for kratom use, with most categorized as mental health, pain management, substance use disorder, or miscellaneous purposes that included increasing focus, treating insomnia, and decreasing fatigue. Neurological diseases and digestive disorders were also reported. Relatively few (< 2%) responses reported recreational use, abuse potential, or adverse effects of kratom. CONCLUSIONS: Although kratom is not approved as a safe and effective therapy for any indication, individuals use kratom for a broad spectrum of health-related purposes. Limitations of this study include potential bias for respondents with perceived positive experiences using kratom, lack of demographics data, and lack of independent verification of claims made by respondents. Regardless, this study reflects perceptions regarding the therapeutic uses of kratom and provides insight into potential individual-level consequences of regulating kratom in the U.S. It is important to study the public's perception of kratom use, which can aid regulatory purposes and provide clinically important information on individuals' use and valuation of kratom. Published by Elsevier B.V.

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Human psychopharmacology (2022) PMID: 34309900 ↗
A systematic review of (pre)clinical studies on the therapeutic potential and safety profile of kratom in humans.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Systematic Review published in Human psychopharmacology involving n = 57 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Although the initial (pre)clinical evidence on kratom's therapeutic potential and its safety profile in humans is encouraging, further validation in large, controlled clinical trials is required.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a tropical plant traditionally used as an ethnomedicinal remedy for several conditions in South East Asia. Despite the increased interest in its therapeutical benefits in Western countries, little scientific evidence is available to support such claims, and existing data remain limited to kratom's chronic consumption. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to investigate (pre)clinical evidence on the efficacy of kratom as a therapeutic aid and its safety profile in humans. METHODS: A systematic literature search using PubMed and the Medline database was conducted between April and November 2020. RESULTS: Both preclinical (N = 57) and clinical (N = 18) studies emerged from our search. Preclinical data indicated a therapeutic value in terms of acute/chronic pain (N = 23), morphine/ethanol withdrawal, and dependence (N = 14), among other medical conditions (N = 26). Clinical data included interventional studies (N = 2) reporting reduced pain sensitivity, and observational studies (N = 9) describing the association between kratom's chronic (daily/frequent) use and safety issues, in terms of health consequences (e.g., learning impairment, high cholesterol level, dependence/withdrawal). CONCLUSIONS: Although the initial (pre)clinical evidence on kratom's therapeutic potential and its safety profile in humans is encouraging, further validation in large, controlled clinical trials is required. © 2021 The Authors. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

09
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Asian journal of psychiatry (2019) PMID: 31100603 ↗
Pharmacokinetics of mitragynine, a major analgesic alkaloid in kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): A systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Systematic Review published in Asian journal of psychiatry. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Rudimentary pharmacokinetics of mitragynine was described in this systematic review.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a tropical tree found in southern Thailand and northern states of the Malay Peninsula. Kratom is commercially available and used as an alternative to treat opioid withdrawal. Mitragynine is the major indole alkaloid found in kratom leaves. This review aimed to summarize available pharmacokinetic information about mitragynine. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from their inceptions to June 2018. All types of pharmacokinetic studies of mitragynine were included for further systematic review. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were reviewed. Mitragynine is a lipophilic weak base passively transported across the intestinal wall and blood brain barrier. 85-95% is bound to plasma protein and extensively metabolized by phase I and particularly phase II enzymes. Actions on CYP enzymes are unlikely to impact drug metabolism at concentrations likely to exist in kratom-consuming humans. In rats and humans, mitragynine is rapidly absorbed after orally administration (Tmax˜1.5 h, Cmax˜0.3-1.8 μM). Vd was 37-90 L/kg; t1/2 was 3-9 hr; mostly excreted as metabolites in urine. Bioavailability was estimated as 21%. It also rapidly penetrated and redistributed in brain. A quality assessment tool tailored for pharmacokinetic studies was also created which rated some studies of lower value. CONCLUSION: Rudimentary pharmacokinetics of mitragynine was described in this systematic review. However, the discovered studies provided scant information on the role of metabolism and redistribution into tissues nor the rate of excretion.

10
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Drug and alcohol dependence (2018) PMID: 29248691 ↗
Kratom use and mental health: A systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Systematic Review published in Drug and alcohol dependence. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Results inform clinicians working in the mental health and substance use fields, policy-makers, and researchers about the mental health effects of this plant.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a psychoactive plant native to Southeastern Asia that is receiving increased international attention as a potential therapeutic agent. While much of the limited scientific research on kratom is focused on its analgesic potential, kratom use also has important risks and benefits in the domain of mental health. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of all studies on kratom use and mental health published between January 1960 and July 2017. RESULTS: Findings indicate kratom's potential as a harm reduction tool, most notably as a substitute for opioids among people who are addicted. Kratom also enhances mood and relieves anxiety among many users. For many, kratom's negative mental health effects - primarily withdrawal symptoms - appear to be mild relative to those of opioids. For some users, however, withdrawal is highly uncomfortable and maintaining abstinence becomes difficult. CONCLUSION: Results inform clinicians working in the mental health and substance use fields, policy-makers, and researchers about the mental health effects of this plant.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category