NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lactase

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Lactase is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (1 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 228,302 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 1 Meta · 5 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 228,302
Reported Trial Dosages 180 mg · 1 g · 12 g
Trial Duration Range 6 months · 1 weeks · 16 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (180 mg · 1 g · 12 g) over a structured 6 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (14 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (6 RCTs · 6 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (1 meta-analyses · 5 reviews)
01

What Is Lactase & Why Does Form Matter?

Lactase is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (180 mg, 1 g, 12 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lactase frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lactase acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lactase an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 1 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 228,302 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:38426798 (2024) — "Effect of lactase supplementation on infant colic: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials." (A meta-analysis of two RCTs found no difference in crying duration and fussing time during 1 week of lactase treatment compared with placebo (mean difference [MD] -17.66 min/day, 95% confidence interval [CI], -60.8 to 25.5; I2 = 68% and MD 2.75, 95% CI, -58.2 to 57.2; I2 = 80%, r) • PMID:30306546 (2018) — "Dietary modifications for infantile colic." (OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of dietary modifications for reducing colic in infants less than four months of age.) • PMID:26713460 (2017) — "Recent advances on lactose intolerance: Tolerance thresholds and currently available answers." (CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics, in particular L reuteri, and preparations containing fennel oil appear effective for reducing colic, although there are limitations to these findings.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 384267982.75 (-58.2–57.2)PMID 26713460-72.1 (-64.4–-47.3)PMID 300093350.2-91Null (0)77Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 180 mg · 1 g · 12 g · 6 g over 6 months · 1 weeks · 16 weeks · 5 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Lactase, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (180 mg · 1 g · 12 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 6 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (2024) PMID: 38426798 ↗
Effect of lactase supplementation on infant colic: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition involving n = 391 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0052 (MD 2.75). Key conclusion: A meta-analysis of two RCTs found no difference in crying duration and fussing time during 1 week of lactase treatment compared with placebo (mean difference [MD] -17.66 min/day, 95% confidence interval [CI], -60.8 to 25.5; I2 = 68% and MD 2.75, 95% CI, -58.2 to 57.2; I2 = 80%, r
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

To systematically review evidence on the efficacy and safety of using a lactase supplementation for managing infant colic. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched (up to September 2023) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral lactase supplementation with placebo or no intervention in infants younger than 6 months old with infant colic. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Outcomes measured were selected according to a standardized core outcome set. Five RCTs involving a total of 391 infants were identified. Three RCTs reported reduced crying duration, but one showed effect only in a compliant group (40.4%, p = 0.0052). A meta-analysis of two RCTs found no difference in crying duration and fussing time during 1 week of lactase treatment compared with placebo (mean difference [MD] -17.66 min/day, 95% confidence interval [CI], -60.8 to 25.5; I2 = 68% and MD 2.75, 95% CI, -58.2 to 57.2; I2 = 80%, respectively). Other outcomes were assessed only in individual studies or not reported. The risk of bias was low in only one RCT, high in three, and raised some concerns in one. While individual trials have shown some promise, the overall evidence for the efficacy of lactase supplementation in treating infant colic remain inconclusive. Further well-designed RCTs are necessary to determine the effects of lactase on managing infant colic. © 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.

02
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2018) PMID: 30306546 ↗
Dietary modifications for infantile colic.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 1,121 participants (RR 2.03). Key conclusion: OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of dietary modifications for reducing colic in infants less than four months of age.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Infantile colic is typically defined as full-force crying for at least three hours per day, on at least three days per week, for at least three weeks. This condition appears to be more frequent in the first six weeks of life (prevalence range of 17% to 25%), depending on the specific location reported and definitions used, and it usually resolves by three months of age. The aetiopathogenesis of infantile colic is unclear but most likely multifactorial. A number of psychological, behavioural and biological components (food hypersensitivity, allergy or both; gut microflora and dysmotility) are thought to contribute to its manifestation. The role of diet as a component in infantile colic remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of dietary modifications for reducing colic in infants less than four months of age. SEARCH METHODS: In July 2018 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase , 17 other databases and 2 trials registers. We also searched Google, checked and handsearched references and contacted study authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating the effects of dietary modifications, alone or in combination, for colicky infants younger than four months of age versus another intervention or placebo. We used specific definitions for colic, age of onset and the methods for performing the intervention. We defined 'modified diet' as any diet altered to include or exclude certain components. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome was duration of crying, and secondary outcomes were response to intervention, frequency of crying episodes, parental/family quality of life, infant sleep duration, parental satisfaction and adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS: We included 15 RCTs involving 1121 infants (balanced numbers of boys and girls) aged 2 to 16 weeks. All studies were small and at high risk of bias across multiple design factors (e.g. selection, attrition). The studies covered a wide range of dietary interventions, and there was limited scope for meta-analysis. Using the GRADE approach, we assessed the quality of the evidence as very

03
CLINICAL STUDY Critical reviews in food science and nutrition (2017) PMID: 26713460 ↗
Recent advances on lactose intolerance: Tolerance thresholds and currently available answers.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Meta-Analysis published in Critical reviews in food science and nutrition involving n = 16 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -72.1). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics, in particular L reuteri, and preparations containing fennel oil appear effective for reducing colic, although there are limitations to these findings.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To determine the strength of evidence for commonly used interventions for colic in breast-fed and mixed-fed infants younger than 6 months. METHODS: Searches of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, AMED, and Web of Science databases were conducted from July 2014 to July 2015. Included studies were randomised controlled trials involving mothers and their colicky infants younger than 6 months; assessed colic against the Wessel or modified Wessel criteria; and included phytotherapies, prescription medicines, and maternal dietary interventions. Studies with <16 participants were excluded. Meta-analyses were conducted where data were sufficient to enable pooling. Quality was assessed against the Cochrane Risk Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. The 6 studies included for subgroup meta-analysis on probiotic treatment, notably Lactobacillus reuteri, demonstrated that probiotics appear an effective treatment, with an overall mean difference in crying time at day 21 of -55.8 min/day (95% CI -64.4 to -47.3, P = 0.001). The 3 studies included for subgroup meta-analysis on preparations containing fennel suggest it to be effective, with an overall mean difference of -72.1 min/day (95% CI -126.4 to -17.7, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics, in particular L reuteri, and preparations containing fennel oil appear effective for reducing colic, although there are limitations to these findings. The evidence for maternal dietary manipulation, lactase, sucrose, glucose, and simethicone is weak. Further well-designed clinical trials are required to strengthen the evidence for all of these interventions.

04
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (2016) PMID: 26655941 ↗
Infant Colic-What works: A Systematic Review of Interventions for Breast-fed Infants.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Systematic Review published in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Key conclusion: Author information: (1)*Child Health Research Centre, Children's Nutrition R
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

4. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 May;62(5):668-86. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001075. Infant Colic-What works: A Systematic Review of Interventions for Breast-fed Infants. Harb T(1), Matsuyama M, David M, Hill RJ. Author information: (1)*Child Health Research Centre, Children's Nutrition R

05
CLINICAL STUDY Human brain mapping (2025) PMID: 41128341 ↗
Dose-Dependent Effects of Catecholaminergic Modulation on Interference Control: Role of Baseline GABA and Glx in Cortico-Subcortical Networks.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Human brain mapping involving n = 71 participants. Key conclusion: Neurophysiological (EEG data) analyses revealed increased theta-band (TBA) and alpha-band activity (ABA) overlapping in the mid-superior-frontal and inferior-frontal clusters under conditions of heightened cognitive control demands.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Cognitive control, which is critical for goal-directed behavior, involves resolving conflicts between competing stimuli and is influenced by neurotransmitter interactions within cortico-subcortical areas. This study investigated the relationship between baseline amino acid transmitter levels and interference control, focusing on the effects of experimentally enhancing catecholaminergic signaling. Using a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design with two dosage groups, n = 71 healthy human adults underwent proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy once to assess baseline GABA+ and Glx levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), striatum, and supplementary motor area (SMA). Participants then performed a subliminally primed flanker task inducing different scales of conflict twice while EEG was recorded: once after receiving a placebo (lactase) and once more under either low (0.25 mg/kg) or medium (0.50 mg/kg) doses of methylphenidate (MPH), which modulates the catecholaminergic and amino acid transmitter systems driving cognitive and interference control. Medium MPH doses were more effective than low doses at reducing subliminal interference effects, highlighting dose-specific behavioral improvements. Higher striatal GABA+ levels led to better interference control at low doses, while lower ACC GABA+ and GABA+/Glx levels were associated with better interference control at medium doses, suggesting a dose-dependent shift from striatal to ACC dominance in conflict resolution. Neurophysiological (EEG data) analyses revealed increased theta-band (TBA) and alpha-band activity (ABA) overlapping in the mid-superior-frontal and inferior-frontal clusters under conditions of heightened cognitive control demands. The findings highlight that whether and how amino acid transmitter levels in cognitive control-relevant regions modulate interference conflicts depends on the degree of catecholaminergic signaling. © 2025 The Author(s). Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of dairy science (2025) PMID: 40614809 ↗
Tolerance of protein-hydrolyzed lactose-free A1 milk and A2 milk in lactose-tolerant and lactose-intolerant volunteers: A randomized crossover trial with 2 parallel groups.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of dairy science. Key conclusion: In conclusion, protein-hydrolyzed lactose-free A1A2 milk was as tolerated as A2 milk in lactose-tolerant volunteers and better tolerated by lactose-intolerant volunteers.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Some studies have shown that only A2 β-casein-containing milk (A2 milk) causes fewer gut symptoms in milk-sensitive individuals compared with milk containing both A1 and A2 β-caseins (A1A2 milk). However, in most of the previous clinical studies, the role of lactose in symptom generation has been largely overlooked. Partial hydrolysis of β-caseins during milk processing has been noted to influence gastrointestinal symptoms of sensitive individuals, such as those with irritable bowel syndrome. Currently, there is no clear conclusion about the factors behind gut symptoms in milk-sensitive individuals, aside from lactose in those who are lactose intolerant, or milk protein allergy. Our study involved a 3-leg, 3-d randomized crossover trial examining the effects of heat-treated, homogenized A2 and hydrolyzed A1A2 milk on gastrointestinal symptoms, fecal calprotectin, and plasma inflammation markers in 36 self-reported milk-sensitive volunteers. During the result interpretation phase, the participants were categorized into groups according to their lactase enzyme genotype. There was no difference in the amount of perceived gut symptoms between A2 and A1A2 hydrolyzed milk in the lactose-tolerant group, while gut symptoms increased in the lactose-intolerant group along with the increasing lactose content. Calprotectin and high-sensitivity CRP did not increase during any of the intervention periods compared with the milk-free run-in period. Weak evidence of certain inflammatory cytokine changes was seen, but no significant results were obtained. In conclusion, protein-hydrolyzed lactose-free A1A2 milk was as tolerated as A2 milk in lactose-tolerant volunteers and better tolerated by lactose-intolerant volunteers. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2025) PMID: 40573057 ↗
Lactase-Treated A2 Milk as a Feasible Conventional Milk Alternative: Results of a Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial to Assess Tolerance, Gastrointestinal Distress, and Preference for Milks Varying in Casein Types and Lactose Content.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Conclusions: These findings suggest that adults who avoid conventional fluid milk consumption may experience minimal GI discomfort from lactose-free and/or A1-free milks.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Previous research indicates that gastrointestinal discomfort from milk consumption may be attributable to A1 β-casein, rather than lactose intolerance alone. A2 milk (free of A1 β-casein) consumption may result in fewer symptoms compared to conventional milk containing both A1/A2 β-casein. Objective: In this five-week, double-blind, double-crossover study, we assessed the physiological responses to doses escalating in volume of lactose-free conventional milk (Lactaid), A2 milk, and lactose-free A2 milk in fluid milk-avoiding participants. Methods: Each milk type was consumed over three separate weeks with three increasing doses across five days per week, >one week washout. Gastrointestinal symptoms, blood glucose, and breath gases were monitored for twenty-four, two-, and three-hours post-consumption, respectively. Sensory evaluation was completed for each sample. Results: Fifty-three participants consented and were randomized, with forty-eight participants completing the study. Overall, symptoms were minimal. On Days 1 and 3, lower ratings of bloating and flatulence were observed in A2 compared to lactose-free A2. Breath hydrogen responses reflected lactose content, but were higher in lactose-free A2 than Lactaid on Day 5. Thirty-three participants were deemed lactose-intolerant and had higher fasting and average breath hydrogen for all samples. The only symptom corresponding to the increase in breath hydrogen among these participants was flatulence after A2 consumption. Surprisingly, flatulence was apparently higher for lactose-tolerant individuals when consuming Lactaid compared to A2. Conclusions: These findings suggest that adults who avoid conventional fluid milk consumption may experience minimal GI discomfort from lactose-free and/or A1-free milks.

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) BMC pediatrics (2022) PMID: 35922776 ↗
Oral lactase for infantile colic: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in BMC pediatrics involving n = 80 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Oral lactase treatment in infantile colic results in symptomatic relief in terms of shortening of duration of crying or fussing, and better parental satisfaction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Infantile colic is a common problem during the first three months of life. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in an urban hospital in Delhi, India evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral lactase in management of infantile colic. METHODS: One hundred sixty-two clinically healthy infants aged < 5 months age [mean (SD) = 63.5 (30.5) days] fulfilling the Rome-IV diagnostic criteria for infantile colic were enrolled. Eligible children were randomly allocated to receive 5 drops of lactase (600 FCC units/mL) (n = 80) or placebo (n = 82) mixed with breast milk or formula feed four times a day for a duration of 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were duration of crying or fussing (min/d), and number of days with colic lasting > 3 h/d; secondary outcomes were parental satisfaction and adverse events. RESULTS: At the end of four weeks, mean (SD) crying or fussing time (min/d) was significantly shorter in infants receiving lactase in comparison to placebo [89.9 (115.2) vs.178.5 (153.2); P = 0.001]. The mean (SD) number of days with colic was also significantly less in the lactase group as compared to placebo group at the end of the treatment [12.1 (7.8) vs 17.6 (8.4); P < 0.001]. By the end of 4th week, parental satisfaction in terms of infant's mood, activity, alertness, comfort and oral intake was better in intervention group. The adverse event profile was comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral lactase treatment in infantile colic results in symptomatic relief in terms of shortening of duration of crying or fussing, and better parental satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2017/12/010930) registered on 20/12/2017. © 2022. The Author(s).

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics (2021) PMID: 34266522 ↗
[Efficacy and safety of lactase additive in preterm infants with lactose intolerance: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics involving n = 30 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Lactase additive can safely and effectively improve the clinical symptoms caused by lactose intolerance in preterm infants.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of lactase additive in improving lactose intolerance in preterm infants. METHODS: A total of 60 preterm infants with lactose intolerance who were admitted to the Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2018 to December 2019 were randomly divided into a lactase treatment group and a control group, with 30 infants in each group. The infants in the lactase treatment group were given 4 drops of lactase additive (180 mg) added into preterm formula or breast milk, and those in the control group were given placebo, oral administration of probiotics (live combined Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus powder) at half an hour after feeding (1 g each time, twice a day), and clockwise abdominal massage around the belly button at 1 hour after feeding for 15 minutes each time, 3 times a day. Fecal pH, fecal reducing sugar, growth indicators, symptoms of lactose intolerance, and laboratory markers were measured at the end of the first and second weeks after intervention. RESULTS: Finally 29 infants in the lactase treatment group and 26 infants in the control group completed the trial. At the end of the first week after intervention, compared with the control group, the lactase treatment group had significantly lower frequency of daily milk vomiting and gastric retention amount (P < 0.05) and a significantly higher proportion of infants with fecal pH > 5.0 (P < 0.05). At the end of the second week after intervention, compared with the control group, the lactase treatment group had significantly lower frequency of daily milk vomiting and 24-hour abdominal circumference difference (P < 0.05) and a significantly higher proportion of infants with the absence of gastric retention, fecal pH > 5.0, or negative reducing sugar in feces (P < 0.05). No adverse reactions associated with the lactase additive or probiotics were observed during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Lactase additive can safely and effectively improve the clinical symptoms caused by lactose intolerance in preterm infants. 目的: 探讨乳糖酶添加剂对改善早产儿乳糖不耐受的有效性和安全性。 方法: 选取上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院2018年1月至2019年12月收治的有乳糖不耐受症状的早产儿60例纳入研究,随机分为乳

10
CLINICAL STUDY Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology (2025) PMID: 40529305 ↗
Synergistic treatment of sodium propionate and Sishen Pill for diarrhea mice with kidney-yang deficiency syndrome.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: The 50% Sishen Pill + 120 mg/kg sodium propionate group and 25% Sishen Pill + 240 mg/kg sodium propionate group also exhibited significant differences in mental status, microbial activity, and Lactobacillus count relative to those of normal group (p < 0.01).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of sodium propionate in combination with Sishen Pill in the treatment of diarrhea with kidney-yang deficiency syndrome in mice, with a focus on its influence on intestinal microbiota, enzyme activity, and associated therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: A model of diarrhea with kidney-yang deficiency syndrome was established via adenine combined with Folium sennae administration. The model group was randomly assigned to the following treatment groups: natural recovery group, 100% Sishen Pill group, 75% Sishen Pill + 60 mg/kg sodium propionate group, 50% Sishen Pill + 120 mg/kg sodium propionate group, 25% Sishen Pill + 240 mg/kg sodium propionate group, and 480 mg/kg sodium propionate group. A variety of parameters, including general symptoms, body weight, rectal temperature, intestinal microbiota composition, microbial activity, and enzyme activity, were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with natural recovery group, the 480 mg/kg sodium propionate group presented significant improvements in mental state, anal temperature, fecal water content, the thymus index, and Bifidobacterium counts (p < 0.01). Compared with those in normal group, the fecal water content and Escherichia coli counts in the 100% Sishen Pill group were significantly different (p < 0.01), but no significant differences were observed compared with those in natural recovery group (p > 0.05). The 75% Sishen Pill + 60 mg/kg sodium propionate group showed improvements in mental state, food and water intake, body weight, rectal temperature, fecal water content, spleen, and thymus index, Bifidobacterium counts, total bacterial count, E. coli count, microbial activity, and lactase activity, which were close to normal levels, and significant differences were observed when compared to the natural recovery group (p < 0.01). The 50% Sishen Pill + 120 mg/kg sodium propionate group and 25% Sishen Pill + 240 mg/kg sodium propionate group also exhibited significant differences in mental status, microbial activity, and Lactobacillus count relative to those of normal group (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the 50% Sishen Pill + 120 mg/kg sodium propionate group presen

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category