NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lactoferrin

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Lactoferrin is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (7 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 7,536 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 7 Meta · 2 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 8 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 7,536
Reported Trial Dosages 200 mg · 833 mg · 100 mg
Trial Duration Range 37 weeks · 28 weeks · 46 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (200 mg · 833 mg · 100 mg) over a structured 37 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
inflammation (PubMed clinical endpoint)
immune (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Lactoferrin & Why Does Form Matter?

Lactoferrin is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (200 mg, 833 mg, 100 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lactoferrin frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (8 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lactoferrin acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lactoferrin an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 7 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 7,536 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:39841980 (2025) — "Efficacy of lactoferrin supplementation in pediatric infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (LF supplementation was associated with fewer patients with culture-proven or probable neonatal LOS compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR): 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.86), with fewer patients with diarrhea compared to placebo in children (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41-0.75)) • PMID:37924642 (2023) — "Assessment of food supplements for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: Based on this NMA, probiotics and synbiotics had the potential to be the top two preferable food supplements.) • PMID:37782505 (2023) — "Probiotics, Prebiotics, Lactoferrin, and Combination Products for Prevention of Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis." (Multiple-strain probiotics alone (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80; RD, -10.0%; 95% CI, -13.9% to -5.1)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)OR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 398419800.56 (0.41–0.75)PMID 379246420.47PMID 354815940.78PMID 353330340.43 (0.2–0.9)PMID 346203260.57 (0.44–0.74)0.2Null (1)5Metric: OR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 200 mg · 833 mg · 100 mg · 2,500 g over 37 weeks · 28 weeks · 46 weeks · 3 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Lactoferrin, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (200 mg · 833 mg · 100 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 37 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 17 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire (2025) PMID: 39841980 ↗
Efficacy of lactoferrin supplementation in pediatric infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire (OR 0.56). Key conclusion: LF supplementation was associated with fewer patients with culture-proven or probable neonatal LOS compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR): 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.86), with fewer patients with diarrhea compared to placebo in children (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41-0.75)
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Pediatric infections account for approximately one-third of all deaths in children under 5 years globally. Lactoferrin (LF) supplementation has the potential to reduce infection-related morbidity due to its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunoregulatory properties. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of oral LF supplementation randomized controlled trials in population under 18 years old. The primary outcomes were infection-associated outcomes: late onset sepsis (LOS), diarrhea, and upper respiratory infections (URIs). We also analyzed mortality among LOS studies. Of 1594 citations identified, 25 studies met eligibility criteria, including 10 studies of LOS, 14 of diarrhea, and 8 of URI. LF supplementation was associated with fewer patients with culture-proven or probable neonatal LOS compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR): 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.86), with fewer patients with diarrhea compared to placebo in children (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41-0.75), and no significant fewer patients with URI (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.27-1.40). Before LF can be used as a public health intervention, it is necessary to refine some aspects of the design of future trials. Ideally these trials should be conducted in countries with the highest burden of infections, where the potential benefit is expected to have the largest impact. © 2025 The Author(s). Permission for reuse (free in most cases) can be obtained from copyright.com.

02
META-ANALYSIS Computers in biology and medicine (2023) PMID: 37924642 ↗
Assessment of food supplements for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Computers in biology and medicine (OR 0.47). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Based on this NMA, probiotics and synbiotics had the potential to be the top two preferable food supplements.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The network meta-analysis (NMA) investigated the efficacy of six food supplements, namely glutamine, arginine, lactoferrin, prebiotics, synbiotics, and probiotics, in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing different food supplements for premature infants were included. RESULTS: Probiotics (OR, 0.47; 95% CrI, 0.33-0.63), arginine (OR, 0.38; 95% CrI, 0.14-0.98), glutamine (OR, 0.30; 95% CrI, 0.079-0.90), and synbiotics (OR, 0.13; 95% CrI, 0.037-0.37). were associated with a decreased incidence of NEC. Only probiotics (OR, 0.81; 95% CrI, 0.69-0.95) and lactoferrin (OR, 0.74; 95% CrI, 0.54-0.92) achieved lower risk of sepsis. Probiotics (OR, 0.58; 95% CrI, 0.40-0.79), prebiotics (OR, 0.23; 95% CrI, 0.043-0.86), and synbiotics (OR, 0.15; 95% CrI, 0.035-0.50) were associated with lower odds of mortality. Probiotics (MD, -2.3; 95% CrI: -3.7- -0.63) appeared to have earlier age of attainment of full feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this NMA, probiotics and synbiotics had the potential to be the top two preferable food supplements.

03
META-ANALYSIS JAMA pediatrics (2023) PMID: 37782505 ↗
Probiotics, Prebiotics, Lactoferrin, and Combination Products for Prevention of Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in JAMA pediatrics (RR 0.38). Key conclusion: Multiple-strain probiotics alone (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80; RD, -10.0%; 95% CI, -13.9% to -5.1
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Erratum in JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;178(1):99. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.5514. Comment in JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Nov 1;177(11):1129-1131. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3856. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2024 Mar;53(2):101-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2024.01.006. IMPORTANCE: Modulation of intestinal microbiome by administering probiotics, prebiotics, or both may prevent morbidity and mortality in premature infants. OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative effectiveness of alternative prophylactic strategies through a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar from inception until May 10, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible trials tested probiotics, prebiotics, lactoferrin, and combination products for prevention of morbidity or mortality in preterm infants. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A frequentist random-effects model was used for the NMA, and the certainty of evidence and inferences regarding relative effectiveness were assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: All-cause mortality, severe necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-proven sepsis, feeding intolerance, time to reach full enteral feeding, and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 106 trials involving 25 840 preterm infants were included. Only multiple-strain probiotics were associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared with placebo (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.86; risk difference [RD], -1.7%; 95% CI, -2.4% to -0.8%). Multiple-strain probiotics alone (vs placebo: RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50; RD, -3.7%; 95% CI, -4.1% to -2.9%) or in combination with oligosaccharides (vs placebo: RR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.37; RD, -5.1%; 95% CI, -5.6% to -3.7%) were among the most effective interventions reducing severe necrotizing enterocolitis. Single-strain probiotics in combination with lactoferrin (vs placebo RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.78; RD, -10.7%; 95% CI, -13.7% to -3.5%) were the most effective intervention for reducing sepsis. Multiple-strain probiotics alone (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80; RD, -10.0%; 95% CI, -13.9% to -5.1

04
META-ANALYSIS Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) (2022) PMID: 35481594 ↗
Effect of Lactoferrin Supplementation on Inflammation, Immune Function, and Prevention of Respiratory Tract Infections in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) involving n = 20 participants (OR 0.78). Key conclusion: Clinical studies on Lf supplementation are limited, although findings show 200 mg Lf/d reduces systemic inflammation, while formulas containing 35-833 mg Lf/d may reduce RTI incidence in infants and children, suggesting improved immune function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Lactoferrin (Lf) is a glycoprotein present in human and bovine milk with antimicrobial and immune-modulating properties. This review aimed to examine the evidence for the effect of Lf supplementation on inflammation, immune function, and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in humans. Online databases were searched up to December 2020 to identify relevant, English-language articles that examined the effect of Lf supplementation in human subjects of all ages, on either inflammation, immune cell populations or activity, or the incidence, duration, or severity of respiratory illness or RTIs. Twenty-five studies (n = 20 studies in adults) were included, of which 8 of 13 studies (61%) in adults reported a decrease in at least 1 systemic inflammatory biomarker. Immune function improved in 6 of 8 studies (75%) in adults, with changes in immune cell populations in 2 of 6 studies (33%), and changes in immune cell activity in 2 of 5 studies (40%). RTI outcomes were reduced in 6 of 10 studies (60%) (n = 5 in adults, n = 5 in children), with decreased incidence in 3 of 9 studies (33%), and either decreased frequency (2/4, 50%) or duration (3/6, 50%) in 50% of studies. In adults, Lf reduced IL-6 [mean difference (MD): -24.9 pg/mL; 95% CI: -41.64, -8.08 pg/mL], but not C-reactive protein (CRP) [standardized mean difference: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.82, 0.65], or NK cell cytotoxicity [MD: 4.84%; 95% CI: -3.93, 13.60%]. RTI incidence was reduced in infants and children (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.98) but not in adults (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.32). Clinical studies on Lf supplementation are limited, although findings show 200 mg Lf/d reduces systemic inflammation, while formulas containing 35-833 mg Lf/d may reduce RTI incidence in infants and children, suggesting improved immune function. Future research is required to determine optimal supplementation strategies and populations most likely to benefit from Lf supplementation. This trial was registered at PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021232186) as CRD42021232186. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

05
META-ANALYSIS Minerva obstetrics and gynecology (2023) PMID: 35333034 ↗
Role of lactoferrin in preventing preterm birth and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Minerva obstetrics and gynecology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.006 (OR 0.43). Key conclusion: Further large and adequately powered randomized trial are needed in order to elucidate the actual role of lactoferrin in reducing the risk of preterm birth and in affecting perinatal outcomes in women at risk.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review was to report the role of lactoferrin supplementation for the prevention of preterm birth (PTB) in women at risk. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and Embase databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were studies exploring maternal and perinatal outcomes in women at high-risk for preterm birth receiving compared to those not receiving lactoferrin during pregnancy. The primary outcome was preterm PTB<37 weeks; the secondary outcomes were gestational age at birth, PTB<34 and 28 weeks, preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM), chorioamnionitis and admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Random effect meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Six studies (333 pregnancies) were included. Overall, women taking lactoferrin had a lower risk of PTB<37 weeks of gestation with an OR of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.2-0.9). Likewise, gestational age at delivery was higher in women-taking compared to those not-taking lactoferrin (MD=0.46 weeks, SD=0.17, P=0.006). The other included studies explored the role of lactoferrin in affecting the inflammatory profile in the amniotic fluid of women undergoing invasive test, without reporting its actual role in preventing PTB. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic administration of lactoferrin can reduce the risk of PTB in women at risk. Further large and adequately powered randomized trial are needed in order to elucidate the actual role of lactoferrin in reducing the risk of preterm birth and in affecting perinatal outcomes in women at risk.

06
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2022) PMID: 35276902 ↗
Comparative Effects between Oral Lactoferrin and Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation on Iron-Deficiency Anemia: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (MD 41.44). Key conclusion: In conclusion, this study supports lactoferrin as a superior supplement to ferrous sulfate regarding the improvement in serum iron parameters and hemoglobin levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Ferrous sulfate is a commonly used iron supplement for the correction of iron-deficiency anemia but with frequent gastrointestinal side effects. Milk-derived iron-binding glycoprotein lactoferrin possesses well gastrointestinal tolerance and fewer side effects caused by the intake of high-dose iron. However, the underlying mechanism of the iron-enhancing effect of lactoferrin remains unclear. In addition, the comparative efficacies between lactoferrin and ferrous sulfate are also remained to be determined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on published intervention studies to investigate how lactoferrin modulate iron metabolism and evaluate the comparative effects between lactoferrin and ferrous sulfate supplementation on iron absorption, iron storage, erythropoiesis and inflammation. Lactoferrin supplementation had better effects on serum iron (WMD: 41.44 ug/dL; p < 0.00001), ferritin (WMD: 13.60 ng/mL; p = 0.003) and hemoglobin concentration (11.80 g/dL; p < 0.00001), but a reducing effect on fractional iron absorption (WMD: −2.08%; p = 0.02) and IL-6 levels (WMD: −45.59 pg/mL; p < 0.00001) compared with ferrous sulfate. In conclusion, this study supports lactoferrin as a superior supplement to ferrous sulfate regarding the improvement in serum iron parameters and hemoglobin levels. Considering the weak influence of lactoferrin on iron absorption, the anti-inflammation effect of lactoferrin may be the potential mechanism to explain its efficacy on iron status and erythropoiesis.

07
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2021) PMID: 34620326 ↗
Lactoferrin reduces the risk of respiratory tract infections: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 1,194 participants (OR 0.57). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The administration of Lf shows promising efficacy in reducing the risk of RTIs.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Lactoferrin (Lf) is one of the key immunomodulatory substances found naturally in various body fluids, such as saliva, tears, and breast milk, and forms a vital part of the innate defense against invading pathogens. Various studies have demonstrated antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral properties of Lf and its protective role against respiratory tract infections (RTIs). The present meta-analysis aims to elucidate the association of Lf administration in reducing the risk of RTIs by systematically reviewing the data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline & CINAHL, Turning Research into Practice (TRIP), ProQuest Theses & Dissertations Databases, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception till March 15, 2021. The primary outcome measure was a reduction in respiratory illness; decrease in frequency, symptoms, and duration. Random-effects model was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We used Cochrane's RoB-2 to appraise the risk of bias of included RCTs. RESULTS: A total of nine RCTs were eligible for this review, of which six were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, two studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly reduced odds of developing respiratory infections with the use of Lf relative to the control (pooled odds ratio = 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.74, n = 1,194), with sufficient evidence against the hypothesis of 'no significant difference' at the current sample size. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of Lf shows promising efficacy in reducing the risk of RTIs. Current evidence also favours Lf fortification of infant formula. Lf may also have a beneficial role in managing symptoms and recovery of patients suffering from RTIs and may have potential for use as an adjunct in COVID-19, however this warrants further evidence from a large well-designed RCT.

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Nutrients (2020) PMID: 32987621 ↗
Enteral Bioactive Factor Supplementation in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Systematic Review published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Feeding preterm infants with mother's own milk is associated with a reduction in postnatal complications and an improved neurocognitive outcome.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Feeding preterm infants with mother's own milk is associated with a reduction in postnatal complications and an improved neurocognitive outcome. Therefore, the bioactive factor composition of human milk has been used as a tool for the development of nutritional supplements with a potential prophylactic or therapeutic effect. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview on bioactive factors which have been studied as supplement to enteral nutrition in randomized controlled trials, and to provide an overview of ongoing trials. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinical trial registers were searched. Studies on the antimicrobial protein lactoferrin were excluded as these were summarized very recently in three separate systematic reviews. Studies on vitamins D, K and iron were also excluded as they are already incorporated in most international guidelines. We identified 17 different bioactive factors, which were investigated in 26 studies. Despite the encouraging potential effects of several bioactive factors, more high-quality studies with a sufficient number of preterm infants are required before a certain factor may be implemented into clinical practice. Three large trials (n > 500) that investigate the effects of either enteral insulin or vitamin A are currently ongoing and could provide more definite answers on these specific supplements.

09
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire (2021) PMID: 32721215 ↗
Evidence from systematic reviews of randomized trials on enteral lactoferrin supplementation in preterm neonates.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire. Key conclusion: There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the effects of lactoferrin on late-onset sepsis between larger and smaller studies, which may reflect either small study biases, differences in the effectiveness, dose or duration of supplemental lactoferrin products, or differen
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

In this commentary, we summarize the current evidence from randomized controlled trials on enteral lactoferrin supplementation in preterm neonates. Our recently completed systematic review includes 12 randomized controlled trials performed all over the world. Our meta-analysis suggests clinical benefit in decreasing late-onset sepsis, late-onset fungal sepsis, length of stay in the hospital and urinary tract infections. There were no adverse effects. There was no statistically significant decrease in necrotizing enterocolitis, mortality or neurodevelopmental impairment in lactoferrin supplemented preterm infants. There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the effects of lactoferrin on late-onset sepsis between larger and smaller studies, which may reflect either small study biases, differences in the effectiveness, dose or duration of supplemental lactoferrin products, or differences in underlying population risk, or any or all of these.

10
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020) PMID: 32232984 ↗
Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 5,425 participants (RR 0.82). Key conclusion: Sensitivity analysis including only good methodological certainty studies suggested a decrease in late-onset sepsis with enteral lactoferrin supplementation (typical RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.78, 0.97; typical RD -
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Lactoferrin, a normal component of human colostrum and milk, can enhance host defenses and may be effective for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm neonates. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and effectiveness of lactoferrin supplementation to enteral feeds for prevention of sepsis and NEC in preterm neonates. Secondarily, we assessed the effects of lactoferrin supplementation to enteral feeds on the duration of positive-pressure ventilation, development of chronic lung disease (CLD) or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), length of hospital stay to discharge among survivors, and adverse neurological outcomes at two years of age or later. SEARCH METHODS: We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to update our search. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2019, Issue 9), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 20 January 2020), PREMEDLINE (1996 to 20 January 2020), Embase (1980 to 20 January 2020), and CINAHL (1982 to 20 January 2020). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: In our search, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating enteral lactoferrin supplementation at any dose or duration to prevent sepsis or NEC in preterm neonates. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Meta-analysis of data from twelve randomized controlled trials showed that lactoferrin supplementation to enteral feeds decreased late-onset sepsis (typical RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91; typical RD -0.04, 95% CI, -0.06, -0.02; NNTB 25, 95% CI 17 to 50; 12 studies, 5425 participants, low-certainty evidence) and decreased length of hospital stay (MD -2.38, 95% CI, -4.67, -0.09; 3 studies, 1079 participants, low-certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis including only good methodological certainty studies suggested a decrease in late-onset sepsis with enteral lactoferrin supplementation (typical RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.78, 0.97; typical RD -

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category