NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lipase

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Lipase is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 2,210 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 9 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 2,210
Reported Trial Dosages 34 g · 51 g · 11 g
Trial Duration Range 2 weeks · 3 weeks · 12 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (34 g · 51 g · 11 g) over a structured 2 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (20 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (9 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Lipase & Why Does Form Matter?

Lipase is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (34 g, 51 g, 11 g).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lipase frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (9 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lipase acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lipase an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 2,210 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41722228 (2026) — "Emulsifiers in poultry nutrition-molecular mechanism of lipid metabolism and energy utilization: A meta-analysis and KEGG mapping." (In summary, emulsifiers modulate lipid metabolism at the molecular level, which offers mechanistic support for improving energy utilization and may also aid in developing precision nutrition strategies in poultry.) • PMID:41662956 (2026) — "Oral Multienzyme Supplementation Alters Postprandial Plasma Nutrient Concentrations after a Mixed Meal in Healthy Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial." (CONCLUSIONS: Multienzyme supplementation improved macronutrient digestion of a mixed meal in middle-aged and older adults.) • PMID:41610672 (2026) — "Dual intestinal-hepatic modulation by phenolic acids improves metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis." (CONCLUSION: Collectively, these findings define PhAM as a phenolic-acid-based agent that aligns intestinal lipid restriction with hepatic oxidative unloading, offering a mechanistically coherent framework for potentially addressing steatotic liver disease-associated metaboli)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)HR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 414813110.71 (0.53–0.95)PMID 363003040.77 (0.35–1.69)0.2Null (1)5Metric: HR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 34 g · 51 g · 11 g · 240 mg over 2 weeks · 3 weeks · 12 weeks · 8 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Lipase, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (34 g · 51 g · 11 g) and re-evaluate efficacy after 2 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 20 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Poultry science (2026) PMID: 41722228 ↗
Emulsifiers in poultry nutrition-molecular mechanism of lipid metabolism and energy utilization: A meta-analysis and KEGG mapping.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Poultry science. Key conclusion: In summary, emulsifiers modulate lipid metabolism at the molecular level, which offers mechanistic support for improving energy utilization and may also aid in developing precision nutrition strategies in poultry.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The feed energy derived from fat remains relatively low because young poultry have limited fat digestibility and inefficient lipid metabolism. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of emulsifiers in regulating lipid metabolism and increasing lipase activity in poultry. A quantitative review of 57 studies (2015-2025) revealed that emulsifier supplementation significantly upregulated genes associated with lipogenesis, including diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2), and increased lipolysis through the upregulation of perilipin 1 (PLN1). It also increased the activities of lipoprotein lipase and total lipase. Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) mapping also suggested that fatty acid biosynthesis (gga00061), β-oxidation (gga00071), the PPAR signalling pathway (gga03320), cholesterol metabolism (hsa04979), and the regulation of lipolysis (gga04923) in adipocyte regulation pathways were synergistically activated. Taken together, these pathways suggest that emulsifiers improve lipid turnover, oxidative metabolism and lipoprotein formation in broiler chickens. In summary, emulsifiers modulate lipid metabolism at the molecular level, which offers mechanistic support for improving energy utilization and may also aid in developing precision nutrition strategies in poultry.

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Journal of nutrition (2026) PMID: 41662956 ↗
Oral Multienzyme Supplementation Alters Postprandial Plasma Nutrient Concentrations after a Mixed Meal in Healthy Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Journal of nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Multienzyme supplementation improved macronutrient digestion of a mixed meal in middle-aged and older adults.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Age-related decline in digestive function increases malnutrition risk. Supplementing meals with digestive enzymes may improve macronutrient digestion and bioavailability in adults reaching older ages. OBJECTIVES: To assess postprandial plasma nutrient concentrations after co-ingestion of a mixed meal and a mixture of 6 enzyme preparations (ENZ), including proteases, lipase, amylase, and glucoamylase. METHODS: Thirty middle-aged and older adults (56 ± 11 y; 18 females, 12 males) ingested chicken, peas, potatoes, and butter (435 kcal; 34 g protein, 51 g carbohydrate, 11 g fat) with either ENZ or placebo (PLA) in a randomized crossover fashion. Blood samples were collected at baseline and throughout a 0-5 h postprandial period for measurement of plasma amino acid, insulin, glucose, and nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations. Clustering of postprandial amino acid responses was conducted in MFuzz, and logistic regression for response groups was conducted in JMP 18.2.0 (JMP Statistical Discovery LLC). RESULTS: Plasma amino acid concentrations were not statistically different between treatments (PLA compared with ENZ) over the postprandial period (all P > 0.05). Leucine time to maximum concentration was significantly faster (P = 0.047) with ENZ (121.2 ± 55.9 min) compared with PLA (141.0 ± 49.2 min). Postprandial plasma glucose concentrations (P = 0.04) and total NEFA (P = 0.001) were higher with ENZ compared with PLA. Three distinct response patterns (clusters) were detected within and across all postprandial amino acid categories. Differences in habitual macronutrient intake and interactions between sex, lean mass, and BMI distinguished participants with an earlier time to maximum postprandial leucine concentration when consuming ENZ compared with PLA from those with stable responses. CONCLUSIONS: Multienzyme supplementation improved macronutrient digestion of a mixed meal in middle-aged and older adults. For plasma amino acids, this benefit was most pronounced in adults with lower BMI and higher lean mass, and the effect was sex-dependent. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05211440.

03
CLINICAL STUDY Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie (2026) PMID: 41610672 ↗
Dual intestinal-hepatic modulation by phenolic acids improves metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Collectively, these findings define PhAM as a phenolic-acid-based agent that aligns intestinal lipid restriction with hepatic oxidative unloading, offering a mechanistically coherent framework for potentially addressing steatotic liver disease-associated metaboli
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH) arises from sustained triglyceride overload of the intestine-liver axis, yet current therapies rarely coordinate intestinal lipid entry with hepatic triglyceride disposal. Here we identify a phenolic-acid fraction as a dual-compartment metabolic modulator that couples intestinal lipase inhibition to CPT1α-PPARα-dependent hepatic β-oxidation across species. METHODS: Across species, we investigated the kinetics and metabolic actions of a phenolic fraction (PhAM) using recombinant lipase systems, epithelial transport assays, hepatocyte models, pharmacokinetics, diet-induced metabolic disease paradigms, quantitative histopathology, and a 24-week randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. RESULTS: PhAM selectively suppresses pancreatic and intestinal lipases non-competitively, lowering V_max with minimal K_m change, resembling some features of orlistat, but via a distinct, non-covalent mechanism. In Caco-2 monolayers and ex vivo loops, it reduces apical-to-basolateral fatty-acid flux, depletes intracellular triglycerides, and limits luminal-to-plasma lipid transfer. PhAM is orally bioavailable, with measurable plasma exposure and prolonged intestinal residence. Under high-fat feeding, it increases fecal fat loss, attenuates post-lipid-load triglyceride excursions, and lowers hepatic triglycerides without altering ApoB secretion. Its triglyceride-lowering effect requires CPT1α-dependent mitochondrial import and PPARα activation, elevates β-hydroxybutyrate, and induces oxidative genes while sparing lipogenesis. In chronic MASH, PhAM reduces steatosis, ballooning, inflammation, and metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) Activity Score. A 24-week clinical subgroup, defined by ultrasound and transaminase enrichment, showed dose-responsive improvements in ultrasonographic steatosis and metabolic biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these findings define PhAM as a phenolic-acid-based agent that aligns intestinal lipid restriction with hepatic oxidative unloading, offering a mechanistically coherent framework for potentially addressing steatotic liver disease-associated metaboli

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) JAMA oncology (2026) PMID: 41481311 ↗
Toripalimab vs Dacarbazine as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Melanoma of Acral Subtype: The Phase 3 MELATORCH Randomized Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in JAMA oncology involving n = 256 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.02 (HR 0.71). Key conclusion: The BICR-assessed objective response rate of 11.0% (95% CI, 6.2%-17.8%) vs 8.6% (95% CI, 4.4%-14.9%), and the median duration of response of 13.8 (95% CI, 5.9-not evaluable) mont
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Comment in JAMA Oncol. 2026 Mar 1;12(3):241-242. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.5663. IMPORTANCE: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been the standard first-line treatment for advanced melanoma; however, their clinical benefit in advanced melanoma predominantly of acral subtype remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) vs dacarbazine as the first-line treatment in advanced melanoma predominantly of acral subtype. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, open-label, positive-control phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced melanoma from January 22, 2018, to July 12, 2023. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed stage III or IV melanoma and no prior systemic therapy for advanced melanoma. Data were analyzed from September 23 to November 27, 2023. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab, 240 mg, every 2 weeks for up to 2 years, or dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m2, every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxic effects. Patients in the dacarbazine group were allowed to receive toripalimab after radiographic disease progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. RESULTS: The analysis included 256 patients (median [range] age, 58 [18-85] years; 113 females [44.3%] and 142 males [55.7%]), among whom 160 participants (62.7%) had acral melanoma; 127 were randomized to receive toripalimab and 128 to dacarbazine (1 patient was excluded for Good Clinical Practice violation). The median (range) follow-up period was 11.8 (0.1-62.5) months. Toripalimab significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 29.2% (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95; P = .02) compared with dacarbazine as assessed by BICR . Consistent PFS benefit was observed in most predefined subgroups, including patients with acral subtype. The BICR-assessed objective response rate of 11.0% (95% CI, 6.2%-17.8%) vs 8.6% (95% CI, 4.4%-14.9%), and the median duration of response of 13.8 (95% CI, 5.9-not evaluable) mont

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Hepatology communications (2025) PMID: 41284948 ↗
Mediterranean and low-fat diets are equally effective in MASLD resolution at 12 weeks regardless of PNPLA3 genotype: A randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Hepatology communications; statistical significance reported at p = 0.976. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Weight reduction achieved by MD and LFD is similarly efficient in steatosis and fibrosis reduction, while PNPLA3 genotype does not affect the response to diet.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Dietary interventions are key for managing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), yet optimal diets and the role of PNPLA3 in modulating response to diet remain unclear. We evaluated the efficacy of a Mediterranean diet (MD) versus a low-fat diet (LFD) on hepatic fat and fibrosis, assessing interactions with PNPLA3 genotype. METHODS: Two hundred fifty adults with MASLD with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 were randomized to a 12-week moderately hypocaloric MD or LFD intervention. Individuals with excess alcohol intake and other etiologies of steatosis were excluded. Subjects were genotyped for PNLPA3 single-nucleotide polymorphism. Anthropometric measures, blood tests, and liver assessments [controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM)] were conducted at baseline and follow-up. Essential food items were provided, and adherence was tracked using validated questionnaires. The primary outcome was CAP, analyzed using linear mixed models adjusted for age and metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: Both diets significantly reduced CAP, LSM, and body weight at follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. The mean difference between MD and LFD was -0.13 dB/m for CAP (p=0.976, 95% CI: -8.54, 8.28), -0.19 kPa for LSM (p=0.355, 95% CI: -0.58, 0.21), and 3.01 kg for weight (p=0.159, 95% CI: -7.21, 1.19). PNPLA3 genotype did not significantly interact with diet for CAP, LSM, or weight (p=0.286, p=0.464, p=0.622, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Weight reduction achieved by MD and LFD is similarly efficient in steatosis and fibrosis reduction, while PNPLA3 genotype does not affect the response to diet. Further studies investigating the impact of diet and nutrigenetics on liver-related outcomes are warranted.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine (2025) PMID: 41144257 ↗
Clinical and Biological Efficacy of Thai Herbal Blood Lipid-Lowering Formulation for Borderline Hyperlipidemia: A Double-Blind Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: The clinical investigation revealed that the Thai herbal formulation significantly decreased total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels (P < 0.05), and additionally reduced triglycerides and elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, in comparison to the control gro
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BackgroundTraditional Thai herbal medicine represents an alternative and complementary approach for managing hyperlipidemia, according to its low toxicity and advantageous benefits. However, there is limited clinical data for Thai herbal medicine formulations for hyperlipidemia.ObjectivesThe present study aimed to evaluate the biological and clinical efficacy of Thai herbal formulation for lowering blood lipids in patients with borderline hyperlipidemia.Materials and methodsThe chemical profile, in vitro antioxidant activity, pancreatic lipase inhibition, and cytotoxicity tests were evaluated in the aqueous and ethanol extracts of Thai herbal formulation. The clinical efficacy and safety of Thai herbal formulation for reducing blood lipids were assessed in patients with borderline hyperlipidemia during a 12-week period.ResultsThe main chemical constituents of Thai herbal formulation, including (+)-chebulic acid, 4-glucogallic acid, gallic acid, ellagic acid, piscidic acid, and 6-gingerol, demonstrated anti-oxidant and pancreatic lipase inhibitory effects. In cytotoxicity testing, the aqueous extracts exhibited no inhibitory effect on L929 cells and Vero cells (IC50 values above 80 μg/mL), whereas the ethanol extracts presented IC50 values of 18.59 ± 0.58 µg/mL in Vero cells and 39.86 ± 0.02 µg/mL in L929 cells. The clinical investigation revealed that the Thai herbal formulation significantly decreased total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels (P < 0.05), and additionally reduced triglycerides and elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, in comparison to the control group after 12 weeks, thereby demonstrating its efficacy in hyperlipidemia management.ConclusionThe findings indicated that the Thai herbal formulation exhibited potential as a herbal therapeutic approach for borderline hyperlipidemia management.

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Molecular nutrition & food research (2025) PMID: 40898743 ↗
Phytosterols and Phospholipids Synergistically Improve Lipid Metabolism and Oxidative Stress: Evidence From Animal Model and Human Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Molecular nutrition & food research involving n = 82 participants. Key conclusion: In conclusion, PSs, particularly when combined with PLs, effectively improve cholesterol profile and oxidative stress parameters.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of phytosterols (PSs), alone or in combination with phospholipids (PLs), on dyslipidemia and oxidative stress, using both a high-fat diet-induced rat model and a randomized controlled trial in individuals with borderline hypercholesterolemia. In the animal study, Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups (control, model, PS, PL, and PS+PL) and treated for 8 weeks. The PS+PL combination significantly reduced body weight, liver index, and serum glutathione peroxidase activity, while improving hepatic and adipose morphology. In the human trial, 82 participants were randomized into PS, PS+PL, or placebo groups and treated for 2 months in a triple-blind, parallel-design trial. Both PS and PS+PL groups showed significant reductions in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, reactive oxygen species, and lipid peroxidation, along with improvements in antioxidant enzyme and lipase activities. The PS+PL group showed additional effects, including reduced apolipoprotein B and lactate dehydrogenase levels, demonstrating superior efficacy compared to PS alone. In conclusion, PSs, particularly when combined with PLs, effectively improve cholesterol profile and oxidative stress parameters. These findings highlight the potential translational benefits of PS+PL as a functional dietary intervention for managing borderline hypercholesterolemia. © 2025 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Gut and liver (2025) PMID: 40852738 ↗
Early Oral Refeeding in Patients with Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Gut and liver involving n = 80 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.026 (RR 0.75). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: ERF effectively shortens hospitalization in mild PEP patients without increasing safety risks (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04750044).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the safety and efficacy of early oral refeeding (ERF) versus delayed refeeding (DRF) in patients with mild post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ERF or DRF group. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ERF or DRF group. In the ERF group, feeding began 24 hours after the diagnosis of PEP; in the DRF group, feeding commenced once normal bowel sounds returned and pain had decreased to a visual analog scale score of <2. The diet was advanced from clear fluids to soft foods according to patient tolerance. Refeeding was temporarily halted if the visual analog scale score reached ≥5 points or if intake was refused due to pain. Resumption required normal amylase/lipase levels, pain relief, and bowel movement restoration. Discharge criteria included patient well-being >24 hours post-diet. The primary outcome was PEP hospitalization duration, and secondary outcomes were the incidence of severe acute pancreatitis, readmission rate (<30 days), and PEP-related mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (40 in each ERF and DRF group) were enrolled across nine referral centers. Baseline characteristics, procedural parameters and initial PEP severity were not significantly different between the two groups. Four ERF and three DRF patients had refeeding interruptions. ERF significantly reduced PEP hospitalization duration compared to DRF (2.93±1.59 days vs 3.78±1.97 days: relative risk, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.97; p=0.026). Rates of severe acute pancreatitis, readmission, and mortality/morbidity related to PEP were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: ERF effectively shortens hospitalization in mild PEP patients without increasing safety risks (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04750044).

09
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of cystic fibrosis (2025) PMID: 40750484 ↗
Results of a clinical trial of ANG003, a non-porcine pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, in people with cystic fibrosis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of cystic fibrosis; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: ANG003 lipase significantly improves DHA+EPA and total fat absorption in a dose dependent manner.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) prevents malnutrition in people with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, including those with cystic fibrosis (CF). We developed a lipase that is stable against proteolysis and at the pH of the fed stomach, so it can be taken during a meal to promote mixing of enzyme and substrate. We designed a dose-ranging study of ANG003, a microbial PERT combining this lipase with low pH-stable protease and amylase, also of microbial origin. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized evaluation of ANG003 in subjects with CF, studied once without PERT and again after randomization to a single dose level of four possible combinations of lipase, protease, and amylase. We developed blood-based substrate absorption challenge tests employing DHA+EPA, whey and potato starch to determine dose-response to each of these enzymes, respectively. RESULTS: ANG003 improved DHA+EPA absorption with a statistically significant increase with 80 mg and 120 mg lipase doses compared to 20 mg (p = 0.03; p = 0.004). The absorption of total fats followed a similar pattern to DHA+EPA. There was a significant increase in absorbed amino acid equivalents, reflecting proteolysis, over no PERT in the highest (75 mg) dose of protease (p = 0.03). In subjects without diabetes, glucose was slightly lower while c-peptide levels remained unchanged with all amylase doses. Adverse events were mild and transient. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: ANG003 lipase significantly improves DHA+EPA and total fat absorption in a dose dependent manner. Results for ANG003 protease and amylase activity suggest that doses lower than those in current porcine-derived PERTs may be efficacious.

10
CLINICAL STUDY ESMO open (2025) PMID: 40714516 ↗
A phase I study of the CSF1R inhibitor vimseltinib in combination with the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab in patients with advanced sarcoma.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in ESMO open involving n = 19 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Vimseltinib plus avelumab was generally safe and well tolerated.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Sarcomas are frequently infiltrated with immunosuppressive myeloid cells. Vimseltinib is an inhibitor of the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor kinase and has been shown to decrease tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells in preclinical models. We hypothesized that vimseltinib combined with the Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor avelumab would be safe, tolerable, and clinically effective in patients with advanced sarcoma. METHODS: This was a phase I study of vimseltinib plus avelumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic sarcoma. The study used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, followed by dose expansion in patients with select histological subtypes. Vimseltinib was administered daily by mouth in 28-day cycles; avelumab was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary objectives of the dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases were to determine the recommended phase II dose and to estimate the best objective response rate by RECIST version 1.1. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were treated in the dose-escalation phase, and 19 patients were treated in the dose-expansion phase. The most common treatment-related adverse events were asymptomatic increases in serum levels of amylase, lipase, creatine phosphokinase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase. One of six patients treated at the highest dose level had a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 increase in aspartate aminotransferase). The highest dose level was determined to be the recommended phase II dose. There were no objective responses. The median progression-free survival of patients treated at the recommended phase II dose was 1.55 months (95% confidence interval 1.25-1.78 months). Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed a decrease in myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells after treatment. RNA sequencing of paired tumor samples revealed an increase in tumor-infiltrating T cells and a decrease in macrophages after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Vimseltinib plus avelumab was generally safe and well tolerated. This combination had minimal clinical efficacy in our population of heavily pretreated patients with sarcoma.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category