NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Manuka Honey

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Manuka Honey is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 27 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 4,326 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 27 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 7 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 8 RCTs (2 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 4,326
Reported Trial Dosages 1,000 mg · 350 mg · 250 mg
Trial Duration Range 1 months · 7 days · 2 weeks
Reading Time ~14 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 27 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1,000 mg · 350 mg · 250 mg) over a structured 1 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (27 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (12 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (8 RCTs · 2 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 7 reviews)
01

What Is Manuka Honey & Why Does Form Matter?

Manuka Honey is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 27 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1,000 mg, 350 mg, 250 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Manuka Honey frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (8 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Manuka Honey acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Manuka Honey an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 27 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 7 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials (2 double-blind, n = 4,326 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40410721 (2025) — "Efficacy of Manuka honey oral rinse in treatment of xerostomia among elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial." (CONCLUSION: Manuka honey oral rinse demonstrated high efficiency in the management of xerostomia among elderly patients when compared with natural honey as it relieved the symptoms and severity of xerostomia in the elderly along with a high rate of patient satisfaction.) • PMID:40321015 (2025) — "Impact of honey on post-tonsillectomy pain in children (BEE PAIN FREE Trial): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial." (DISCUSSION: Two to three doses daily of oral honey/placebo in children post-extracapsular tonsillectomy for 7 days, in addition to regular paracetamol, ibuprofen and as required oxycodone did not result in a clinical improvement in pain or recovery over a 14-day follow-up period.) • PMID:38375720 (2024) — "Cost-effectiveness analysis of Manuka honey-Omega-3 combination treatments in treating oxidative stress of pediatric β-thalassemia major." (CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that using Manuka honey and Omega-3 as add-on treatments for oxidative stress in pediatric β-thalassemia disease could have significant cost-saving and clinical improvement.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1,000 mg · 350 mg · 250 mg over 1 months · 7 days · 2 weeks · 3 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Manuka Honey, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1,000 mg · 350 mg · 250 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 1 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (27 Studies) · 12 Quantitative Analyses

01
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) BMC oral health (2025) PMID: 40410721 ↗
Efficacy of Manuka honey oral rinse in treatment of xerostomia among elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in BMC oral health involving n = 42 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Manuka honey oral rinse demonstrated high efficiency in the management of xerostomia among elderly patients when compared with natural honey as it relieved the symptoms and severity of xerostomia in the elderly along with a high rate of patient satisfaction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Xerostomia is a common complaint among elderly patients. Due to the anti-inflammatory effect, Manuka honey could be a promising alternative remedy for many medical conditions, including xerostomia. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Manuka honey oral rinse as a novel management for xerostomia in elderly patients. METHODS: This study was designed as a randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. 42 elderly patients who were all evaluated for the presence of xerostomia and hyposalivation were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups, the interventions were used 3 times per day for 1 month as follows: Manuka honey oral rinse in group I, natural honey oral rinse in group II, and saline in group III (control). The Summated Xerostomia Inventory (SXI) score, The Clinical Oral Dryness Score (CODS), and the salivary flow rate were evaluated for all groups at different intervals. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire was assessed 1 month after intervention. RESULTS: Manuka honey oral rinse caused a significant reduction of the subjective SXI score (2 ± 0.39) and objective clinical oral dryness (5.71 ± 0.91) scores compared to the other 2 groups. Moreover, the salivary flow rate was significantly higher after one month of using Manuka honey oral rinse (1.51 ± 0.34) than honey oral rinse group (1.01a ± 0.19), and the control group (0.81a ± 0.19). The most significant improvement of OHIP scores was seen in the Manuka honey group (5.50 ± 1.16) compared to the honey group (7.57a ± 1.02), and the control group (9.36ab ± 1.78). CONCLUSION: Manuka honey oral rinse demonstrated high efficiency in the management of xerostomia among elderly patients when compared with natural honey as it relieved the symptoms and severity of xerostomia in the elderly along with a high rate of patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT06240806) on 01/14/2024. © 2025. The Author(s).

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Anaesthesia (2025) PMID: 40321015 ↗
Impact of honey on post-tonsillectomy pain in children (BEE PAIN FREE Trial): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Anaesthesia involving n = 400 participants. Key conclusion: DISCUSSION: Two to three doses daily of oral honey/placebo in children post-extracapsular tonsillectomy for 7 days, in addition to regular paracetamol, ibuprofen and as required oxycodone did not result in a clinical improvement in pain or recovery over a 14-day follow-up period.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Tonsillectomy, a common childhood surgery, is associated with difficult postoperative recovery. Previous reviews provided low-grade evidence that honey may improve recovery. The BEE PAIN FREE study investigated whether honey alongside multimodal analgesia improved the recovery trajectory in children following tonsillectomy. METHODS: A prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted across three centres in Western Australia. Children undergoing extracapsular tonsillectomy by coblation were allocated randomly to one of four postoperative treatment groups: standard treatment alone; Marri honey (from Western Australia); Manuka honey (from Western Australia); or placebo. The intervention groups took 5 ml of honey or placebo, six times a day, for at least 7 days, in addition to usual discharge analgesia (standard treatment). Data for daily pain scores, Parents' Postoperative Pain Measure scores, medications and unplanned re-presentations were collected. RESULTS: A total of 400 children were recruited; 20% were lost to follow-up or withdrew. The mean number of honey doses taken varied between 2 and 3 doses per day over 7 days. Treatment with honey at this frequency did not impact postoperative pain scores significantly, with all groups showing similar trajectories. These findings did not alter with as-treated analysis or using imputed models for missing data. Most children experienced significant pain until around postoperative day 8. Children allocated to the honey and placebo groups showed some improved oral tolerance around day 6 but had increased vomiting during earlier days. There were no clinically significant differences in medical re-presentations, simple analgesia or oxycodone usage between groups. DISCUSSION: Two to three doses daily of oral honey/placebo in children post-extracapsular tonsillectomy for 7 days, in addition to regular paracetamol, ibuprofen and as required oxycodone did not result in a clinical improvement in pain or recovery over a 14-day follow-up period. © 2025 The Author(s). Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

03
CLINICAL STUDY European review for medical and pharmacological sciences (2024) PMID: 38375720 ↗
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Manuka honey-Omega-3 combination treatments in treating oxidative stress of pediatric β-thalassemia major.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European review for medical and pharmacological sciences involving n = 50 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that using Manuka honey and Omega-3 as add-on treatments for oxidative stress in pediatric β-thalassemia disease could have significant cost-saving and clinical improvement.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Oxidative stress represents a ruthless complication of β-thalassemia that worsens the severity of that medical condition. There is no conclusive evidence on the best antioxidant used for that issue. Our earlier clinical study concluded that omega-3 and Manuka honey add-on to the conventional therapy had a potential therapeutic impact on reducing oxidative stress. However, there is no research evaluating their cost-effectiveness. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of Omega-3 and Manuka honey supplementation to conventional therapy in treating oxidative stress among children with β-thalassemia major. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cost-effectiveness evaluation of daily supplementation of Omega-3-Manuka honey and Manuka honey alone to the conventional therapy was performed. The economic evaluation was performed on data from a prospective 10-month randomized clinical trial. Fifty patients were recruited into the Omega-3-Manuka honey plus conventional therapy group, 50 patients were included in the Manuka honey alone plus conventional therapy group, and 50 patients receiving the conventional therapy alone served as a control group. Effectiveness measures from the randomized clinical trial were used to determine incremental effectiveness. Cost estimates were calculated from the healthcare payer's perspective. The analysis considered the improvement in oxidative stress biomarkers presented here as a percent change from baseline to determine the incremental effectiveness and cost for the treatment by both interventions. RESULTS: Adding Omega-3 or Manuka honey to conventional therapy was a more cost-effective add-on than conventional treatment alone. Omega-3-Manuka honey was more cost-effective than Manuka honey alone in treating oxidative stress in that condition. Oxidative stress biomarkers were significantly reduced with both experimental medications compared to the conventional therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that using Manuka honey and Omega-3 as add-on treatments for oxidative stress in pediatric β-thalassemia disease could have significant cost-saving and clinical improvement.

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Dermatologic surgery (2023) PMID: 37647156 ↗
Novel Biomaterial Containing Gelatin, Manuka Honey, and Hydroxyapatite Enhanced Secondary Intention Healing Versus Standard Secondary Intention Healing in Mohs Surgical Defects on the Head and Distal Lower Extremities-A Randomized Controlled Trial: Pilot Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Dermatologic surgery. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Biomaterial-enhanced SIH is noninferior to standard SIH and produces less pain and favorable skin thickness compared with standard SIH.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Randomized, comparative studies evaluating augmented secondary intention healing (SIH) compared with conventional SIH in dermatologic surgery are limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of a novel biomaterial enhances SIH, particularly in shortening time to complete re-epithelialization. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether a novel biomaterial containing gelatin, manuka honey, and hydroxyapatite enhances SIH when compared with conventional SIH for surgical defects after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) on the head and distal lower extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing MMS on the head or distal lower extremities were eligible for recruitment. After clear surgical margins were obtained post-MMS, patients were randomized to receive standard SIH or biomaterial enhanced SIH. Patients had regularly scheduled follow-ups with questionnaires at each visit until complete re-epithelialization was achieved. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in time to re-epithelialization between standard SIH and biomaterial-enhanced SIH. However, there was a significant decrease in pain scores and skin thickness in the biomaterial-enhanced SIH group. CONCLUSION: Biomaterial-enhanced SIH is noninferior to standard SIH and produces less pain and favorable skin thickness compared with standard SIH. ClinicalTrials.gov listing: NCT04545476.

05
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) European review for medical and pharmacological sciences (2023) PMID: 37458648 ↗
Comparative effectiveness of adding omega-3 and Manuka honey combination to conventional therapy in preventing and treating oxidative stress in pediatric β-thalassemia major - a randomized clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European review for medical and pharmacological sciences involving n = 165 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that omega-3 + Manuka honey was more effective than Manuka alone or the conventional treatment alone in managing oxidative stress of β-thalassemic patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: β-thalassemia major is an inherited hematological disorder with significant oxidative stress and iron overload. Oxidative stress results in several pathological complications, including cell death, tissue injury, organ dysfunction, and thyroid dysfunction. The present study examined the effectiveness of omega-3 and Manuka honey combination or Manuka honey alone to the conventional therapy (deferasirox, blood transfusion, and L-carnitine) used for preventing and managing oxidative stress or iron overload-induced oxidative stress conditions in pediatric β-thalassemic patients (type major). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 165 patients participated in this randomized, double-blind, standard therapy-controlled, parallel-design multisite trial. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups, receiving either 1,000 mg omega-3 fish oil [350 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 250 mg docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)] combined with Manuka honey lozenge (344 mg) daily or Manuka honey alone plus the conventional therapy for ten months. Plasma 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), CRP (C-reactive protein), ferritin level, and serum iron were determined at baseline and month 10. RESULTS: Omega-3 and Manuka honey combination were a significant add-on to conventional therapy of β-thalassemia in reducing the oxidative stress condition. The combination of Omega-3 and Manuka honey reduced the level of F2-isoprostane(8-iso-PGF2α) significantly compared to the Manuka alone and the control groups. Additionally, they showed an antihemolytic action measured by reduced LDH level. The combination restored the patient's lipid profile (LDL-C and HDL-C) significantly compared to the control group. Manuka honey enhanced the action of omega-3 in reducing oxidative stress by reducing serum iron significantly compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that omega-3 + Manuka honey was more effective than Manuka alone or the conventional treatment alone in managing oxidative stress of β-thalassemic patients.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery (2023) PMID: 37164834 ↗
Effect of manuka honey socket dressing on postoperative sequelae and complications following third molar extraction: A randomized controlled study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery involving n = 112 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.029. Key conclusion: Within the limitations of the study it seems that the application of manuka honey appears to aid earlier healing of the third molar extraction socket, with a significantly lower frequency of complications.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

To evaluate the effect of manuka honey on the healing of mandibular third molar extraction sockets. This was a prospective randomized study at a tertiary health institution in Lagos, Nigeria. All extractions were transalveolar, using the distobuccal bone guttering technique. Participants were randomized into two study groups. Group A underwent intrasocket application of manuka honey, after which sockets were completely closed using the mucosal flap, while participants in group B underwent mucosal flap closure of the socket without application of manuka honey. The primary outcome was healing of the extraction socket at 7 days postoperatively. The secondary outcomes measured were postoperative sequelae, namely pain, swelling, and trismus on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, and socket healing complications - specifically inflamed socket, infected socket, and alveolar osteitis. In total, 112 participants completed the study, with 56 participants per group. There were no significant differences in demographic variables between both groups. On the 7th day postoperatively, 26.8% of participants in group B had an unhealed extraction site, compared with 10.3% of participants in group A (p = 0.029). A significant difference was observed between pre- and postoperative pain scores in both study groups (p = 0.001). A comparison of postoperative mean facial swelling between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences on all the review days (p = 0.66). The difference in postoperative socket healing complication rate between both groups was statistically significant (χ2 = 4.747, p = 0.029). Within the limitations of the study it seems that the application of manuka honey appears to aid earlier healing of the third molar extraction socket, with a significantly lower frequency of complications. Therefore, the application of manuka honey is recommended whenever appropriate.

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of pediatric nursing (2023) PMID: 36792398 ↗
The efficacy of honey or olive oil on the severity of oral mucositis and pain compared to placebo (standard care) in children with leukemia receiving intensive chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of pediatric nursing involving n = 42 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Manuka honey or olive oil can be used as alternative therapies by nurses to children with leukemia and suffering from OM, especially in low and middle-income countries where more expensive therapies may not be available or economical.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is a significant complication occurring in approximately 40 to 80% of patients receiving chemotherapy regimens. Although a wide variety of agents have been tested to prevent OM or reduce its severity, none have provided conclusive evidence. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of honey or olive oil on the severity and OM pain in children with leukemia and suffering from OM compared to placebo (standard care) and, to assess which of the two interventions is more beneficial. METHODS: A single blind randomized controlled study (RCT) was used to evaluate the effect of Manuka honey or olive oil, in the treatment of chemotherapy-related OM in 42 children with leukemia. The primary outcome was the severity of mucositis, using the World Health Organization (WHO) scale and the secondary outcome was the pain assessed using the Visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Children who received the honey had less severe OM (assessed on the (WHO) scale), p = 0.00 and less pain (assessed on the VAS scale), p = 0.00, compared to the control group. Children who received the olive oil had less pain than the control group, p = 0.00), although not lower than the honey group. CONCLUSION: Manuka honey or olive oil can be used as alternative therapies by nurses to children with leukemia and suffering from OM, especially in low and middle-income countries where more expensive therapies may not be available or economical. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pediatric nurses may recommend Manuka honey to treat OM in children with leukemia as it is safe and inexpensive compared to other treatment modalities.

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Indian journal of dental research (2022) PMID: 36254954 ↗
Antibacterial efficacy of manuka honey, ocimum sanctum, curcuma longa and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash on the level of streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus acidophilus - A randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Indian journal of dental research involving n = 20 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: : Essential oil aqueous extracts were as efficient antibacterial mouthwashes as chlorhexidine and iodine mouthwashes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: : To assess the effects of Manuka honey, Ocimum sanctum, Curcuma longa, and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted on dental students of Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad. The study participants will be divided into four groups. Each group will have a total of 20 individuals. By using a lottery system, Group A (Manuka honey mouthrinse), Group B (Ocimum sanctum mouthrinse), Group C (Curcuma longa mouthrinse), and Group D (0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse) will be chosen. To match the circadian cycle, saliva will be collected at baseline and again after 2 weeks between 10 and 10.30 a.m. The sterile container will subsequently be delivered to the microbiological laboratory and processed as soon as possible to measure Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus count. For 2 weeks, participants were told to use 10 mL of mouthrinse twice daily. RESULTS: : The mean oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S) score of all the four groups showed reduction in their scores from baseline to after the study period. For both S. mutans and L. acidophilus, there was a substantial Percentage Reduction (PR) between the prerinse and postrinse samples in all four groups. DISCUSSION: : Because quantitative actions play a crucial part in the caries disease process, the changes in microbial activity before and after administration of experimental mouthwashes were examined. CONCLUSION: : Essential oil aqueous extracts were as efficient antibacterial mouthwashes as chlorhexidine and iodine mouthwashes.

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The British journal of ophthalmology (2022) PMID: 33419788 ↗
Randomised assessor-masked trial evaluating topical manuka honey (Optimel) in treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The British journal of ophthalmology involving n = 59 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.183 (MD 1.087). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Optimel 16% manuka honey eye-drops showed significant improvement in symptoms and objective signs in meibomian gland dysfunction and are an effective alternative treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of manuka honey eye-drops in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. METHODS: This is an assessor-masked (single-blind), randomised controlled trial comparing conventional treatment group with interventional group using Optimel 16% manuka honey topical eye-drops. 59 patients were recruited to the study and randomised into two groups: one given regular lubricants and the other given Optimel 16% manuka honey eye-drops. The Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score was measured at baseline and on follow-up. 4 patients were lost to follow-up. Multiple ocular surface parameters were graded from slit lamp examination by a masked assessor. Results were compared from baseline to follow-up date 3 weeks later. RESULTS: Patients in the conventional treatment group demonstrated minimal difference in SPEED score at 3-week follow-up (mean difference 1.087, p=0.183), which was not statistically significant. However, measurements of tear film break-up time, corneal surface stain (Oxford), lid margin, conjunctival redness, as well as meibum quality and expressibility showed significant improvements at 3 weeks (p<0.01). Patients in the manuka honey eye-drops group showed significant difference after 3 weeks in SPEED score (mean difference 2.53, p=0.006), as well as in lid margin redness, conjunctival redness, corneal surface stain (Oxford), and meibum quality and expressibility (p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Optimel 16% manuka honey eye-drops showed significant improvement in symptoms and objective signs in meibomian gland dysfunction and are an effective alternative treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04457648. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

10
CLINICAL STUDY Free radical biology & medicine (2018) PMID: 30056083 ↗
Manuka honey synergistically enhances the chemopreventive effect of 5-fluorouracil on human colon cancer cells by inducing oxidative stress and apoptosis, altering metabolic phenotypes and suppressing metastasis ability.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Clinical Study published in Free radical biology & medicine. Key conclusion: In conclusion, MH could be a useful preventive or adjuvant agent in the treatment of colorectal cancer with 5-FU.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The development of chemo-sensitizers is urgently needed to overcome 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapeutic resistance and adverse toxicity in colorectal cancer. This work aims to evaluate the synergic effects of 5-FU and Manuka honey (MH), a rich source of bioactive compounds, in enhancing the anticancer effects of this drug on human colon cancer HCT-116 and LoVo cells. Compared to 5-FU alone, MH synergistically enhanced the chemotherapeutic effects of 5-FU, by reducing cell proliferation through the suppression of EGFR, HER2, p-Akt and p-mTOR expression, and promoting apoptosis by the modulation pro-apoptotic (p53, Bax, Cyto c, FasL caspase-3, -8, -9 and cleave-PARP) and anti-apoptotic (Bcl-2) markers. The activations of p-p38MAPK and p-Erk1/2 pathways and ROS production were also involved in this process. Downregulation of transcription factor (NF-κB and Nrf2) and antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase) and expression (SOD, catalase and HO-1) were more evident after the combined treatment, leading to more cell death by oxidative stress. Moreover, additive effects were also observed by increasing lipid and protein oxidation and arresting cell cycle. All the parameters of mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis function decreased and both cells entered the quiescent stage after the combined treatments. MH also influenced the anti-metastasis effects of 5-FU by decreasing migration ability, suppressing the expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 and increasing N-cadherin and E-cadherin. In conclusion, MH could be a useful preventive or adjuvant agent in the treatment of colorectal cancer with 5-FU.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category