NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 2,995 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 3 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 4 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 2,995
Reported Trial Dosages 1.0 g/day · 3 g/day · 200 mg
Trial Duration Range 12 months · 5 days · 30 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1.0 g/day · 3 g/day · 200 mg) over a structured 12 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (17 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (4 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 3 reviews)
01

What Is MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) & Why Does Form Matter?

MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1.0 g/day, 3 g/day, 200 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (4 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 2,995 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40425393 (2025) — "Effects of dietary supplements on patients with osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis." (BACKGROUND: A growing body of research is exploring the role of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory dietary supplements in the treatment of osteoarthritis, highlighting an increasing emphasis on non-pharmacological interventions.) • PMID:29018060 (2018) — "Dietary supplements for treating osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: The overall analysis including all trials showed that supplements provided moderate and clinically meaningful treatment effects on pain and function in patients with hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis at short term, although the quality of evidence was very low.) • PMID:24866892 (2015) — "Chondroprotection and the prevention of osteoarthritis progression of the knee: a systematic review of treatment agents." (CONCLUSION: For patients with or at risk for osteoarthritis, the use of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate may serve as a nonoperative means to protect joint)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1.0 g/day · 3 g/day · 200 mg · 3 g over 12 months · 5 days · 30 days · 14 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1.0 g/day · 3 g/day · 200 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 17 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Journal of integrative medicine (2025) PMID: 40425393 ↗
Effects of dietary supplements on patients with osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of integrative medicine involving n = 2,455 participants (MD -41). Key conclusion: BACKGROUND: A growing body of research is exploring the role of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory dietary supplements in the treatment of osteoarthritis, highlighting an increasing emphasis on non-pharmacological interventions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research is exploring the role of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory dietary supplements in the treatment of osteoarthritis, highlighting an increasing emphasis on non-pharmacological interventions. Although more patients are turning to supplements to manage osteoarthritis, their actual effectiveness remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the available evidence concerning the efficacy of various dietary supplements in osteoarthritis treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for studies on the use of various dietary supplements in the treatment of osteoarthritis from the creation of each database until Jan 20, 2025. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) Research object: osteoarthritis. (2) Intervention measures: patients in the treatment group received dietary supplements, while the control group received placebos. (3) Research type: randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers independently examined the literature and retrieved data based on predefined criteria. The information gathered included the first author, year of publication, sample size, participant demographics, length of the follow-up period, intervention and control measures, and inclusion indications. RCTs comparing dietary supplements to placebo with the pain and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) among patients with osteoarthritis were included. The optimal dietary supplement was identified based on the total ranking by summing the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of these two scores. Furthermore, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to confirm the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Overall, 23 studies covering 21 dietary supplements and involving 2455 participants met the inclusion criteria. In the WOMAC pain score, the SUCRA of passion fruit peel extract was 91% (mean difference [MD]: -9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-16.0, -2.3]), followed by methylsulfonylmethane (89%), undenatured type II collagen (87%), collagen

02
META-ANALYSIS British journal of sports medicine (2018) PMID: 29018060 ↗
Dietary supplements for treating osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in British journal of sports medicine. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The overall analysis including all trials showed that supplements provided moderate and clinically meaningful treatment effects on pain and function in patients with hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis at short term, although the quality of evidence was very low.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dietary supplements for patients with osteoarthritis. DESIGN: An intervention systematic review with random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from inception to April 2017. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing oral supplements with placebo for hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Of 20 supplements investigated in 69 eligible studies, 7 (collagen hydrolysate, passion fruit peel extract, Curcuma longa extract, Boswellia serrata extract, curcumin, pycnogenol and L-carnitine) demonstrated large (effect size >0.80) and clinically important effects for pain reduction at short term. Another six (undenatured type II collagen, avocado soybean unsaponifiables, methylsulfonylmethane, diacerein, glucosamine and chondroitin) revealed statistically significant improvements on pain, but were of unclear clinical importance. Only green-lipped mussel extract and undenatured type II collagen had clinically important effects on pain at medium term. No supplements were identified with clinically important effects on pain reduction at long term. Similar results were found for physical function. Chondroitin demonstrated statistically significant, but not clinically important structural improvement (effect size -0.30, -0.42 to -0.17). There were no differences between supplements and placebo for safety outcomes, except for diacerein. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation suggested a wide range of quality evidence from very low to high. CONCLUSIONS: The overall analysis including all trials showed that supplements provided moderate and clinically meaningful treatment effects on pain and function in patients with hand, hip or knee osteoarthritis at short term, although the quality of evidence was very low. Some supplements with a limited number of studies and participants suggested large treatment effects, while widely used supplements such as glucosamine and chondroitin were either i

03
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The American journal of sports medicine (2015) PMID: 24866892 ↗
Chondroprotection and the prevention of osteoarthritis progression of the knee: a systematic review of treatment agents.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2015 Systematic Review published in The American journal of sports medicine. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: For patients with or at risk for osteoarthritis, the use of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate may serve as a nonoperative means to protect joint
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Structure-modifying medications or nutraceuticals may be an effective treatment for osteoarthritis. This study identified 12 treatments that may possess chondroprotective properties: oral glucosamine; chondroitin; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); polyunsaturated fatty acids; S-adenosylmethionine; avocado and soybean unsaponifiable fractions; methylsulfonylmethane; vitamins C, D, and E; intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid; and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials for the effectiveness of each agent in preserving articular cartilage of the knee and delaying the progression of osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Searches were performed using "treatment," "osteoarthritis," and "knee" as keywords. Selection criteria included randomized controlled trials of ≥12 months, with a placebo control, measuring radiographic changes in joint space width, cartilage volume, or radiographic progression of osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was changes in joint integrity measures. RESULTS: A total of 3514 studies were identified from the initial search, 13 of which met inclusion criteria. Treatment with chondroitin sulfate showed a significant reduction in cartilage loss in 3 of 4 studies identified compared with placebo. Two of 3 trials identified for glucosamine also reported significant structural effects relative to placebo. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid was effective in lowering the rate of cartilage loss in only 1 of 3 studies identified versus placebo. Of the 6 studies identified for NSAIDs, vitamin E, and vitamin D, none showed any structural effect compared with placebo. No studies were found that met the inclusion criteria for polyunsaturated fatty acids, S-adenosylmethionine, avocado and soybean unsaponifiable fractions, methylsulfonylmethane, vitamin C, or PRP. CONCLUSION: For patients with or at risk for osteoarthritis, the use of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate may serve as a nonoperative means to protect joint

04
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Osteoarthritis and cartilage (2008) PMID: 18417375 ↗
Systematic review of the nutritional supplements dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) in the treatment of osteoarthritis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2008 Systematic Review published in Osteoarthritis and cartilage involving n = 297 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: No definitive conclusion can currently be drawn for either supplement.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Conventional treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is associated with serious gastrointestinal side effects and in view of the recent withdrawal of some cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, identifying safer alternative treatment options is needed. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the existing evidence from randomised controlled trials of two chemically related nutritional supplements, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) in the treatment of OA to determine their efficacy and safety profile. METHODS: The electronic databases [Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Amed, Cinahl and NeLH (1950 to November 2007)] were searched. The search strategy combined terms: osteoarthritis, degenerative joint disorder, dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO, methylsulfonylmethane, MSM, clinical trial; double-blind, single blind, RCT, placebo, randomized, comparative study, evaluation study, control. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Data were extracted and quality was assessed using the JADAD scale. RESULTS: Six studies were included [evaluating a total of 681 patients with OA of the knee for DMSO (N=297 on active treatment); 168 patients for MSM (N=52 on active treatment)]. Two of the four DMSO trials, and both MSM trials reported significant improvement in pain outcomes in the treatment group compared to comparator treatments, however, methodological issues and concerns over optimal dosage and treatment period, were highlighted. CONCLUSION: No definitive conclusion can currently be drawn for either supplement. The findings from all the DMSO studies need to be viewed with caution because of poor methodology including; possible unblinding, and questionable treatment duration and dose. The data from the more rigorous MSM trials provide positive but not definitive evidence that MSM is superior to placebo in the treatment of mild to moderate OA of the knee. Further studies are now required to identify both the optimum dosage and longer-term safety of MSM and DMSO, and definitive efficacy trials.

05
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Arthritis research & therapy (2006) PMID: 16859534 ↗
Osteoarthritis and nutrition. From nutraceuticals to functional foods: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2006 Systematic Review published in Arthritis research & therapy. Key conclusion: It remains to be investigated whether nutritional compounds can have structure-modifying effects.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The scientific and medical community remains skeptical regarding the efficacy of nutrition for osteoarthritis despite their broad acceptation by patients. In this context, this paper systematically reviews human clinical trials evaluating the effects of nutritional compounds on osteoarthritis. We searched the Medline, Embase, and Biosis databases from their inception to September 2005 using the terms random, double-blind method, trial, study, placebo, and osteoarthritis. We selected all peer-reviewed articles reporting the results of randomised human clinical trials (RCTs) in osteoarthritis that investigated the effects of oral interventions based on natural molecules. Studies on glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate were excluded. The quality of the RCTs was assessed with an osteoarthritic-specific standardised set of 12 criteria and a validated instrument. A best-evidence synthesis was used to categorise the scientific evidence behind each nutritional compound as good, moderate, or limited. A summary of the most relevant in vitro and animal studies is used to shed light on the potential mechanisms of action. Inclusion criteria were met by 53 RCTs out of the 2,026 identified studies. Good evidence was found for avocado soybean unsaponifiables. Moderate evidence was found for methylsulfonylmethane and SKI306X, a cocktail of plant extracts. Limited evidence was found for the Chinese plant extract duhuo jisheng Wan, cetyl myristoleate, lipids from green-lipped mussels, and plant extracts from Harpagophytum procumbens. Overall, scientific evidence exists for some specific nutritional interventions to provide symptom relief to osteoarthritic patients. It remains to be investigated whether nutritional compounds can have structure-modifying effects.

06
CLINICAL STUDY Terapevticheskii arkhiv (2025) PMID: 40561485 ↗
[Combination therapy for exacerbations of pain in osteoarthritis with non-fixed combinations].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv involving n = 30 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.04. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The combination of CS/GL/MSM/HA with collagen significantly outperforms collagen-free therapy in reducing pain, improving joint function, and decreasing symptomatic treatment needs in patients with knee OA exacerbations.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of a combination therapy containing chondroitin sulfate (CS), glucosamine (GL), methylsulfonylmethane (MSM), hyaluronic acid (HA), and native/hydrolyzed collagen compared to collagen-free therapy in the initial management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) exacerbations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, prospective, comparative phase IV study included 60 patients with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence stages 2-3). Participants were randomized into two groups: Group A (n=30) received CS/GL/MSM/HA, while Group B (n=30) received the same regimen supplemented with collagen. Pain dynamics (VAS, WOMAC), NSAID requirements, and functional outcomes (Timed Up-and-Go test, walking speed, muscle strength) were assessed at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8. RESULTS: Group B demonstrated significant superiority: a 76% reduction in WOMAC pain scores (vs. 47% in Group A; p=0.04) and a 74% reduction in VAS scores (vs. 56%; p<0.05). NSAID use at week 8 was 2.6±0.5 days in Group B (vs. 4.3±1.8 in Group A; p=0.04). Functional improvements (12% increase in walking speed, 42% reduction in Timed Up-and-Go test duration) were also more pronounced in Group B (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of CS/GL/MSM/HA with collagen significantly outperforms collagen-free therapy in reducing pain, improving joint function, and decreasing symptomatic treatment needs in patients with knee OA exacerbations. These findings support the inclusion of collagen in OA combination therapy. Publisher: Цель. Оценка эффективности комбинации хондроитина сульфата (ХС), глюкозамина (ГГ), метилсульфонилметана (МСМ), гиалуроновой кислоты (ГК) с добавлением нативного и гидролизованного коллагена в сравнении с терапией без коллагена при стартовом лечении обострений остеоартрита (ОА) коленного сустава. Материалы и методы. Проведено одноцентровое проспективное сравнительное исследование (IV фаза) с участием 60 пациентов с ОА коленного сустава II–III стадии по Kellgren–Lawrence. Пациенты рандомизированы на две группы: группа А (n=30) получала ХС/ГГ/МСМ/ГК, а группа Б (n=30) – аналогичную терапию с добавлением коллагена. Оценка включала динамику боли (по Визуальной аналоговой шкале, валидизированной шкале о

07
CLINICAL STUDY Nutrients (2025) PMID: 40507030 ↗
Using the Rise and Fall of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Post-Exercise to Evaluate the Effect of Methylsulfonylmethane Supplementation on Immune Response mRNA.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Conclusions: Based on the physiologic actions of the mRNA that changed, some logical potential health effects of MSM may be that it helps with the following: (1) supports muscle recovery by improving macrophage response to exercise, (2) speeds up recovery and restoration of damag
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Long-duration aerobic exercise results in a similar, albeit transient rise and fall in oxidative stress and inflammation, making it a useful model to evaluate nutritional supplements targeting these physiological processes. Objective: To evaluate the impact of MSM supplementation on post-exercise immune response-related mRNA expression. Methods: In the present study, we enrolled healthy, experienced runners (five MSM and five placebo) who were supplemented with Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM; 1.0 g/d) or placebo for 30 days prior to a 21.1 km running event (120 to 150 min). Venous blood samples were collected prior to (PRE) the event, as well as 2 h and 4 h after the event to measure the expression of 700 mRNAs associated with generalized immune response. Results: This study is the first to demonstrate significant effects with lower MSM doses (0.5-1.0 g/d) compared to previous work using higher doses (3 g/d). We identified 29 mRNAs in four distinct immune response pathways (peripheral tissue inflammatory response, myeloid immune cell invasion, NK cell invasion/activity, and notch signaling) whose response was statistically changed with MSM at 2 h and/or 4 h. Conclusions: Based on the physiologic actions of the mRNA that changed, some logical potential health effects of MSM may be that it helps with the following: (1) supports muscle recovery by improving macrophage response to exercise, (2) speeds up recovery and restoration of damaged muscle tissue, (3) supports innate immune responsiveness to DAMP, and (4) reduces and/or improves resistance to oxidative stress after exercise. Future research should seek to validate how the changes observed with exercise may model to various chronic inflammatory states.

08
CLINICAL STUDY Scientific reports (2024) PMID: 39548253 ↗
A chewing gum containing ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid (EDTA), methyl sulfonyl methane (MSM) and xylitol works comparable to chlorehexidine mouthrinse.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Scientific reports; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: Also independent sample t test showed that there were no significant differences between baseline, after first treatment and after second one for all indexes in both groups (P > 0.05).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Dental plaque provides a proper environment for the growth and activity of bacteria responsible for periodontal diseases and caries. As a result, it should be removed by individuals to prevent periodontal diseases and caries. There are different mechanical and chemical plaque control methods. In one study is shown that dental plaque removal efficacy of dentifrice containing Ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid(EDTA)/Methylsulfonylmethane(MSM) was nearly five times that of commercially available fluoride toothpaste. In another study, authors found that xylitol-containing chewing gums caused a marked reduction in the count of Streptococcus Mutans compared to conventional ones. This difference was highly prominent in individuals with poor oral hygiene. In this study we assessed the synergic effects of Xylitol, EDTA and MSM in a chewing gum in comparison with chlorhexidine mouthwash. This study was a crossover, randomized clinical trial. Twenty-four patients were divided in two groups randomly. At the baseline scaling and root planing was done for each patient. Group1 used chlorhexidine mouthwash twice a day. Group2 used novel chewing gum for 15 min twice a day. After 14 days, for every patient O'leary plaque index, gingival index and sulcus bleeding index were reevaluated and recorded. Professional brushing was done for patients. 14 days were considered as wash-out period. After that, method of plaque control of groups was changed. After 14 days, all patients were reevaluated and recorded and were compared with previous data. Samples in 2 groups had no significant difference in age and sex. Paired sample t test revealed that there were significant differences between first and second period for O'leary plaque index, gingival index and sulcus bleeding index in Group1 (P < 0.05). But in Group2 there were no differences between first and second period for all indexes. Also independent sample t test showed that there were no significant differences between baseline, after first treatment and after second one for all indexes in both groups (P > 0.05). According to regression model results, type of treatment had no effect on mean of all indexes. According to our findings which

09
CLINICAL STUDY Terapevticheskii arkhiv (2023) PMID: 38785054 ↗
[Comparative efficacy of a combination of undenatured type II collagen, Boswellic acids, methylsulfonylmethane, vitamins C and D(3) and a combination of chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine hydrochloride in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee joint].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv involving n = 35 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The use of AN in patients with stage I-III primary knee OA was not inferior in efficacy to the combination of GC.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of Artneo (AN) in comparison with a combination of glucosamine hydrochloride and chondroitin sulfate (GC) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint (KJ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 70 patients with stages I-III of primary knee OA were randomized into 2 groups. Participants in the 1st (n=35) took AN 1 caps/day, in the 2nd (n=35) GC according to the standard regimen. After 7, 30, 90, 180 days, the Lequesne index (severity of OA), pain when moving according to VAS, WOMAC score were assessed, after 1, 3, 6 months - quality of life SF-36 and morning stiffness, after 6 months - MRI with T2 mapping, laboratory safety indicators. RESULTS: Over the course of 6 months of use, an improvement in the WOMAC index and a decrease in pain were observed without intergroup differences, and a greater decrease in stiffness in the AN group. After 3 months, the severity of OA decreased from moderate to mild in the AN group and was significantly lower compared to the GC group; quality of life (physical component of SF-36) was higher in the AN group. After 6 months, there was an improvement in cartilage ultrastructure (T2 relaxation time) in both groups and a more pronounced reduction of the synovitis area (MRI) in the AN group (2.95 and 1.37 times in the AN and GC group, respectively). There were no clinically significant adverse reactions observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: The use of AN in patients with stage I-III primary knee OA was not inferior in efficacy to the combination of GC. Further studies with greater statistical power (sample size) and follow-up period are warranted including in real clinical practice. Publisher: Цель. Оценить эффективность Артнео (АН) в сравнении с комбинацией глюкозамина гидрохлорида и хондроитина сульфата (ГХ) у больных остеоартритом (ОА) коленного сустава (КС). Материалы и методы. В исследовании 70 пациентов с I–III стадиями первичного ОА КС рандомизированы на 2 группы. В 1-й (n=35) группе участники принимали АН по 1 капсуле в сутки, во 2-й (n=35) – ГХ по стандартной схеме. Через 7, 30, 90, 180 дней оценивали индекс Лекена (тяжесть ОА), боль при движении по Визуальной аналоговой шкале, индекс WOMAC, через 1, 3

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37447322 ↗
Methylsulfonylmethane Improves Knee Quality of Life in Participants with Mild Knee Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 44 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.046. Key conclusion: This study indicated that MSM oral consumption improved both knee and systemic health conditions in healthy participants who experienced mild pain in the knee joint.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) is a food ingredient present in small amounts in many foods, and its anti-inflammatory effects have been reported. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral consumption of MSM on mild pain of the knee joint in healthy Japanese participants. A total of 88 participants were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to MSM consumption (n = 44) and placebo control (n = 44) groups. Both groups of participants took 10 tablets, each containing 200 mg MSM or lactose, per day for 12 weeks. The primary outcome of this study was measured values of the total score of the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) at 12 weeks after the test sample consumption. Safety evaluation was performed through physical examination, urine analysis, peripheral blood test, and medical interview. The total scores at 12 weeks in the MSM and placebo groups as the primary outcome were significantly different (p = 0.046). The health condition of JKOM also improved after MSM consumption (p = 0.032). The questionnaire results also suggested improvement in the knee and systemic health. This study indicated that MSM oral consumption improved both knee and systemic health conditions in healthy participants who experienced mild pain in the knee joint.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category