NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Olive Leaf Extract

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Olive Leaf Extract is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (3 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 2,590 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 18 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 3 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 9 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 2,590
Reported Trial Dosages 1000 mg · 160 mg · 300 mg
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 8 weeks · 12 months
Reading Time ~9 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 18 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1000 mg · 160 mg · 300 mg) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (18 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (15 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (9 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (3 meta-analyses · 1 reviews)
01

What Is Olive Leaf Extract & Why Does Form Matter?

Olive Leaf Extract is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 18 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1000 mg, 160 mg, 300 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Olive Leaf Extract frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (9 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Olive Leaf Extract acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Olive Leaf Extract an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 18 PubMed studies: 3 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 9 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 2,590 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41848522 (2026) — "Metabolic and inflammatory effects of oleuropein and olive leaf extract: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (Data from methodologically consistent and robust trials indicate no statistically significant metabolic or inflammatory effects under usual human consumption patterns, whereas evidence from other study designs remains inconclusive.) • PMID:36513474 (2022) — "What is the efficacy of dietary, nutraceutical, and probiotic interventions for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Evidence to guide the dietary management of GERD symptoms is limited in scope, quality, and feasibility.) • PMID:41935461 (2026) — "Effects of a combination of olive leaf extract and potassium on blood pressure in participants with mild to moderate hypertension: A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial." (CONCLUSION: The combination of OLE and potassium is a safe adjunctive strategy for individuals with mildly to moderately elevated BP, with favourable effects on lipid profile, oxidative status, and insulin sensitivity that may help reduce cardiometabolic risk in the context of me)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1000 mg · 160 mg · 300 mg · 250 mg over 12 weeks · 8 weeks · 12 months · 24 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Olive Leaf Extract, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1000 mg · 160 mg · 300 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (18 Studies) · 15 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Food & function (2026) PMID: 41848522 ↗
Metabolic and inflammatory effects of oleuropein and olive leaf extract: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Food & function. Key conclusion: Data from methodologically consistent and robust trials indicate no statistically significant metabolic or inflammatory effects under usual human consumption patterns, whereas evidence from other study designs remains inconclusive.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Olive leaves, a by-product of olive oil production, are rich in oleuropein, a phenolic compound with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of olive leaf extract (OLE) and oleuropein on glucose metabolism, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Methods: The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022375615) and followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to January 2026 without restrictions. Eligible studies were RCTs in adults comparing OLE or oleuropein with placebo or control. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (RoB 2) assessment were performed independently by two reviewers; certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Meta-analyses were conducted when at least two trials reported suitable data. Results: Eleven RCTs were included (4 short-term and 7 continuous-intake trials). Short-term crossover studies showed heterogeneous effects on postprandial glycemia and insulin responses, precluding meta-analysis. In continuous-intake, parallel-design RCTs, pooled analyses demonstrated no statistically or clinically significant effects on glycemic or lipid outcomes. Evidence regarding inflammatory markers was scarce and of low certainty. Conclusion: The current evidence does not support clinical recommendations for OLE supplementation aimed at health benefits. Data from methodologically consistent and robust trials indicate no statistically significant metabolic or inflammatory effects under usual human consumption patterns, whereas evidence from other study designs remains inconclusive. Further high-quality RCTs are required to clarify potential metabolic benefits.

02
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2022) PMID: 36513474 ↗
What is the efficacy of dietary, nutraceutical, and probiotic interventions for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 24 participants (OR 7.5). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Evidence to guide the dietary management of GERD symptoms is limited in scope, quality, and feasibility.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) symptoms include pharmaceutical, surgical, dietary, and lifestyle behaviors; however, dietary interventions lack evidence synthesis. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the effect of dietary, probiotic, and nutraceutical interventions on GERD symptoms, with or without pharmaceutical therapy, in adults with a history of GERD or functional dyspepsia compared to no intervention, placebo, or usual care? METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA. The search strategy was implemented in MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Embase on the 28th October 2020 and updated to 27th July 2021. Intervention studies were eligible if they evaluated the effect of a dietary, nutraceutical, or probiotic intervention on GERD symptoms in adults with a history of GERD or functional dyspepsia. The internal validity of studies was assessed using the Academy Quality Criteria Checklist; Review Manager software was used to perform meta-analysis; and certainty in the body of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: 6,608 study records were retrieved from the search, with 21 studies (n = 24 highly heterogenous intervention groups) included (n = 10 restrictive dietary interventions; n = 3 non-restrictive dietary interventions; n = 8 nutraceutical interventions; and n = 3 probiotic interventions). GERD symptoms were clinically and statistically improved by a test-based elimination diet (n = 1 study), low nickel diet (n = 1 study), probiotic yoghurt (n = 1 study), psyllium husk (n = 1 study), prickly pear and olive leaf extract supplement (n = 1 study), and melatonin, amino acid and b-group vitamin supplement (n = 1 study) according to qualitative synthesis. Ginger-containing supplements could be meta-analyzed, and improved incidence of GERD symptom alleviation (n = 2 studies, OR: 7.50 [95%CI: 3.62-15.54], GRADE: high). No clinically and/or statistically significant effects were found for the remaining n = 16 highly heterogenous interventions. CONCLUSION: Evidence to guide the dietary management of GERD symptoms is limited in scope, quality, and feasibility. Based on the limited evidence available, dietary

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Phytomedicine (2026) PMID: 41935461 ↗
Effects of a combination of olive leaf extract and potassium on blood pressure in participants with mild to moderate hypertension: A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Phytomedicine involving n = 70 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The combination of OLE and potassium is a safe adjunctive strategy for individuals with mildly to moderately elevated BP, with favourable effects on lipid profile, oxidative status, and insulin sensitivity that may help reduce cardiometabolic risk in the context of me
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a key modifiable driver of cardiovascular risk and often clusters with dyslipidemia and insulin resistance within the metabolic syndrome. Olive leaf extract (OLE) and potassium have traditionally been used to support blood pressure (BP) management and cardiometabolic health. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of this OLE - potassium combination on BP and key cardiometabolic markers. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 70 adults with untreated mildly to moderately elevated BP received an OLE - potassium supplement (1000 mg OLE, ≥160 mg oleuropein, 300 mg potassium/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: While office BP fell significantly over time in both groups, 7-day home-based BP monitoring showed a significant greater response, with morning systolic BP decreasing by 5.4 mmHg, in the verum group. Supplementation also reduced total cholesterol by 11.1 mg/dL, LDL-cholesterol by 6.9 mg/dL, and triglycerides by approximately 22 mg/dL at Week 6, while HDL-cholesterol remained stable. Fasting glucose and HbA1c were unchanged, but fasting insulin and HOMA-Index declined in the verum group, indicating a modest improvement in insulin sensitivity. Additionally, oxidized LDL decreased by ∼23 %, without changes in hs-CRP. Quality-of-life scores remained stable, although global self-ratings favoured the combination. The intervention was well tolerated, with no product-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The combination of OLE and potassium is a safe adjunctive strategy for individuals with mildly to moderately elevated BP, with favourable effects on lipid profile, oxidative status, and insulin sensitivity that may help reduce cardiometabolic risk in the context of metabolic syndrome.

04
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of hypertension (2025) PMID: 40990594 ↗
Efficacy of olive leaf extracts in controlling blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of hypertension involving n = 307 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: OLE can decrease 24-h BP, BPL, and diastolic BPV with improvement of lipid profile, systemic inflammation, and body weight in hypertensive patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this trial was to assess the effects of olive leaf extract (OLE) on blood pressure (BP) control in patients treated for hypertension. METHODS: This is multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including 621 participants who were randomly assigned to receive either oral OLE ( n = 307) or placebo ( n = 314). The primary outcome was the change in 24-h SBP and DBP from baseline to week-12. Secondary outcomes included the change in BP load (BPL), BP variability (BPV), metabolic parameters, C-reactive protein (CRP), and body weight. RESULTS: OLE significantly reduced 24-h SBP compared to baseline and placebo group [respectively -6.4 mmHg (95% confidence interval, 95% CI -10 to -2.1) and -1.5 mmHg (95% CI -3.9 to 0.51); P < 0.01]. In OLE group, systolic BPL decreased from 53.9% at baseline to 42.2% at 12-week ( P = 0.03); in placebo group, it did not change significantly ( P = 0.55). Diastolic BPL decreased from 30.7 to 21.2% ( P = 0.03) in OLE group and did not change significantly in placebo group ( P = 0.12). In OLE group, systolic BPV did not change significantly between baseline and week-12 [+2%; P = 0.23] while diastolic BPV significantly decreased [-13.3%; P = 0.04]. In placebo group, BPV did not change significantly at week-12 compared to baseline. OLE was associated with improvement in lipid profile and a significant reduction in blood glucose, triglycerides, CRP, and body weight. No significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: OLE can decrease 24-h BP, BPL, and diastolic BPV with improvement of lipid profile, systemic inflammation, and body weight in hypertensive patients.

05
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of molecular sciences (2025) PMID: 40943119 ↗
Beneficial Effect of Olive Leaf Extract as an Adjunct to Standard Antifungal Therapy in Treating Candida-Related Oral Diseases.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in International journal of molecular sciences involving n = 15 participants. Key conclusion: However, in combination with NYS it increased salivation rate, while in combination with miconazole, it significantly decreased tongue burning.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether combined administration of olive leaf extract (OLE) with standard antifungal therapy-nystatin (NYS) or miconazole (MIC) could be a more efficient alternative in reducing the number of Candida colonies, the presence of oral signs and symptoms and changes in salivary IL-17A level compared to standard therapy alone. The study included 59 subjects with a positive microbiological Candida colony number greater than 600 CFU/mL and at least one oral sign or symptom present. Subjects were randomly divided into four groups depending on applied therapy: OLE + NYS group (n = 15), OLE + MIC group (n = 15), NYS group (n = 14), MIC group (n = 15). Therapy duration and clinical monitoring were standardized across all groups. There was no significant difference between the tested groups in Candida spp. colony number or salivary IL-17A levels. In the OLE + NYS group, a significant increase in salivation rate was observed, while a significant decrease in tongue burning was reported in the OLE + MIC group. A significant reduction in burning of the oral mucosa and tongue was observed in the MIC group. No significant differences were found in other clinical signs or symptoms among treatment groups. OLE, as an adjunct to standard antifungal therapy, did not significantly reduce Candida spp. colony number or salivary IL-17A levels. However, in combination with NYS it increased salivation rate, while in combination with miconazole, it significantly decreased tongue burning. Both symptoms are common clinical findings in oral Candida-related disease and suggest that OLE may have supportive potential in the clinical management of these conditions. Further research is needed to explore its potential therapeutic benefits on oral health.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases (2025) PMID: 40685267 ↗
Phenolic-rich extract of olive leaf with a hypocaloric diet alleviates oxidative stress in obese females: a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Adding OLE to a hypocaloric diet improves oxidative stress more effectively compared with a hypocaloric diet alone in obese women.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This trial aimed to investigate the effect of the addition of olive leaf extract (OLE) to a standard calorie-restricted diet on serum oxidative stress markers and liver enzymes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-center double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted for 8 weeks. Seventy women with obesity (BMI> 30, <40 kg/m2) aged 18 and 50 years were equally assigned to each trial group by randomization. The intervention group received OLE capsules (250 mg olive leaf extract/day), and the placebo group received placebo capsules (250 mg placebo/day) both of them received a calorie-restricted diet. Serum concentration of oxidative stress biomarkers and liver enzymes were assessed at baseline and study endpoint. No significant difference was shown in baseline participant characteristics among the OLE and placebo groups (p > 0.05). At the end of the trial, the OLE group showed a lower concentration of serum malondialdehyde compared to the placebo group (-0.61 ± 0.23 vs -0.48 ± 0.21, p = 0.02), result was also significant after adjustment for confounding factors (p = 0.00). There was, however, no significant difference in serum total antioxidant capacity, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, and Lactate Dehydrogenase (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adding OLE to a hypocaloric diet improves oxidative stress more effectively compared with a hypocaloric diet alone in obese women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT registration number: IRCT20190129042552N2).

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) The Journal of nutrition (2025) PMID: 39993475 ↗
Oleuropein Supplementation Increases Resting Skeletal Muscle Fractional Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Activity but Does Not Influence Whole-Body Metabolism: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Trial in Healthy, Older Males.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Journal of nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Chronic OLE supplementation resulted in higher skeletal muscle fractional PDH activity in healthy, older males, wh
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The polyphenol oleuropein activates mitochondrial calcium import, which increases pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity. Preclinically, this increase in PDH activity following oleuropein supplementation resulted in improved mitochondrial bioenergetics and fatigue resistance. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the effects of acute and chronic oleuropein supplementation on muscle energy metabolism, whole-body substrate metabolism, strength, and fatigue resistance in older males. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 40 healthy older males (60 ± 5y) received either placebo (PLA) or 100 mg oleuropein from 250 mg olive leaf extract (OLE) supplementation daily for 36 d. On day 1 and day 36, muscle and blood samples were collected, and indirect calorimetry was performed before and ≤120 min following supplement intake. Leg strength and fatigue were measured before and after 29 d of supplementation. Results were analyzed using analysis of covariance or robust analysis of covariance. RESULTS: OLE ingestion on day 1 and day 36 increased plasma oleuropein metabolites (P < 0.001). On day 1, no differences were observed in muscle PDH activity, mitochondrial respiration, or whole-body substrate metabolism 120 min after acute OLE ingestion. Ribonucleic acid sequencing revealed upregulation of oxidative phosphorylation gene pathways (false discovery rate < 0.05), whereas PDH-Serine293-phosphorylation was higher after acute OLE compared with PLA ingestion (P = 0.015). Following chronic supplementation, fractional PDH activity was ∼25% greater in OLE compared with PLA (49 ± 14 compared with 38 ± 10%; P = 0.016) with no differences in absolute PDH activity and PDH-Serine293-phosphorylation between groups. Mitochondrial respiration and protein content, whole-body substrate metabolism, leg strength, and fatigue resistance were not different between OLE and PLA. Plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was lower after chronic OLE compared with PLA (P = 0.043), with no differences in other blood metabolic markers. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic OLE supplementation resulted in higher skeletal muscle fractional PDH activity in healthy, older males, wh

08
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Explore (New York, N.Y.) (2025) PMID: 39955806 ↗
Impact of olive leaf extract on pain management and functional improvement in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Explore (New York, N.Y.) involving n = 100 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Hydroalcoholic olive leaf extract effectively reduces pain and improves physical functioning in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis, offering a promising complementary treatment option for managing osteoarthritis symptoms.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis is a progressive joint disease that affects one or more joints, leading to restricted movement, pain, and eventual disability. Despite the availability of various treatments and supportive care, managing osteoarthritis symptoms remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Hydroalcoholic olive leaf extract on pain reduction and daily functioning in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHOD: A randomized, controlled, factorial clinical trial was conducted in 2022-2023 with 100 elderly participants suffering from knee osteoarthritis. Participants were selected through consecutive sampling and randomly assigned to four groups using block-stratified randomization. In addition to routine treatment, participants in group I received topical olive leaf extract ointment, Group II received oral olive leaf extract capsules, and Group III received a combination of both treatments. The intervention was administered three times daily for eight weeks. The control group did not receive any olive leaf extract-based interventions. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale, and daily functioning and joint stiffness were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS: The intervention groups showed significantly more significant reductions in mean pain scores than the control group (p < 0.05). The combination of oral capsules and topical ointment among the intervention groups demonstrated the most pronounced pain reduction. The mean score for daily functioning improved significantly over time in all groups (p = 0.007). A decrease of 1.19 units per time increment was observed in the group using the ointment, while the oral capsule group showed a decrease of 0.89 units, both statistically significant (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Hydroalcoholic olive leaf extract effectively reduces pain and improves physical functioning in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis, offering a promising complementary treatment option for managing osteoarthritis symptoms.

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Complementary therapies in clinical practice (2025) PMID: 39818111 ↗
Efficacy and safety of olive leaf extract (Olea europaea L.) for glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (ESOLED): A pilot randomised controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Complementary therapies in clinical practice involving n = 16 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The ESOLED trial has provided preliminary evidence on the tolerability of OLE in adults with type 2 diabetes, but was inconclusive in determining whether OLE is effective at improving glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, diabetes-related distress and quality of lif
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Maintaining optimum glycaemic control is essential to reducing comorbidity and mortality in diabetes. However, research indicates that <50 % of patients achieve their target HbA1c ranges. Laboratory studies suggest that olive leaf extract (OLE) may improve glycaemic control, however clinical studies in persons with diabetes are lacking. METHODS: ESOLED is a pilot, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Adults with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes of ≥12 months duration, and not receiving insulin therapy, were eligible to participate. Participants were randomised to receive OLE or placebo capsules for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included changes in the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, diabetes-related stress, health-related quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants were randomly assigned to the OLE (n = 16) and placebo (n = 15) groups. Analyses found no statistically significant time-group interactions for HbA1c, diabetes-related distress or health-related quality of life. Although participants receiving OLE demonstrated greater improvements in insulin sensitivity than those on placebo, there was no significant difference between groups over time. OLE and placebo were found to be well-tolerated, with no severe or serious adverse events reported in either group. CONCLUSION: The ESOLED trial has provided preliminary evidence on the tolerability of OLE in adults with type 2 diabetes, but was inconclusive in determining whether OLE is effective at improving glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, diabetes-related distress and quality of life. Larger trials and further exploration of the bioavailability of OLE are needed to fully assess the therapeutic potential of OLE in diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000616774).

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Scientific reports (2024) PMID: 39623211 ↗
Evaluating the effectiveness of topical olive leaf extract emulgel in managing recurrent herpes labialis: a randomized controlled clinical study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Scientific reports; statistical significance reported at p = 0.596. Key conclusion: In conclusion, OLE may be a potential alternative treatment for RHL.Trial registration: isrctn.com ID: ISRCTN87606522, 04/09/2023.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Recurrent herpes labialis (RHL) is a lifelong oral health issue that affects about one-third of the world's population, causing frequent, painful, and discomfort lesions. This randomized, triple-blinded study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of olive leaf extract (OLE) compared to acyclovir cream (Veramid 5%) in managing vesicular stage of RHL lesions. Forty patients were randomly divided into two equal groups and were instructed to apply the prescribed medication five times a day for five consecutive days. The evaluation was carried out by measuring the pain intensity on the first day before the treatment was applied (T0), 48 h (T1), and 7 days later (T2). Additionally, the day when the pain completely healed and the day when the lesion's crust fell off spontaneously were recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney test at a significance level of α = 0.05. The study results indicated that there were no significant differences in pain intensity between the two groups during the three evaluation times: T0 (P = 920), T1 (P = 0.596), and T2 (P = 1.00). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the day when the pain was completely healed (P = 0.697). However, the OLE showed a statistically significant advantage regarding the day the lesions' crust fell off (P = 0.040). In conclusion, OLE may be a potential alternative treatment for RHL.Trial registration: isrctn.com ID: ISRCTN87606522, 04/09/2023. © 2024. The Author(s).

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category