NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 4 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2025

St. John's Wort (Hypericum)

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

St. John's Wort (Hypericum) is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 20 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (1 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 1 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 57,546 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) Moderate (3.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 20 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 1 Meta · 2 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 1 RCTs (0 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 57,546
Reported Trial Dosages 1 mg
Reading Time ~10 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 20 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE Moderate).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1 mg) over a structured 8–12 week evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (20 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (4 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (1 RCTs · 0 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (1 meta-analyses · 2 reviews)
01

What Is St. John's Wort (Hypericum) & Why Does Form Matter?

St. John's Wort (Hypericum) is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 20 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for St. John's Wort (Hypericum) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (1 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, St. John's Wort (Hypericum) acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns St. John's Wort (Hypericum) an overall evidence rating of GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) based on 20 PubMed studies: 1 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews, and 1 randomized controlled trials (0 double-blind, n = 57,546 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:26887532 (2016) — "A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies." (However, firm conclusions of efficacy cannot be generally drawn.) • PMID:24402784 (2014) — "Antidepressants for smoking cessation." (We also included trials comparing different doses, using pharmacotherapy to prevent relapse or re-initiate smoking cessation or to help smokers reduce cigarette consumption.) • PMID:40717256 (2025) — "The Effects of St. John's Wort on Healing of Stages 1 and 2 Pressure Injuries: A Randomized Controlled Trial." (CONCLUSION: The findings of this randomized controlled trial revealed no difference between wound healing outcomes when St' John's wort oil was compared to saline in a group of patients.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1 mg over 4–12 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MAJOR] Warfarin: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:11950157). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

• [MAJOR] SSRI (fluoxetine ): Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:11950157). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

• [MAJOR] Cyclosporine: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:11950157). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

• [MAJOR] Concomitant Prescription Medication: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:11950157). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 8–12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking Warfarin, SSRI (fluoxetine ), Cyclosporine, Concomitant Prescription Medication.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (20 Studies) · 4 Quantitative Analyses

01
CLINICAL STUDY Phytotherapy research (2016) PMID: 26887532 ↗
A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Systematic Review published in Phytotherapy research. Key conclusion: However, firm conclusions of efficacy cannot be generally drawn.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses represent the uppermost ladders in the hierarchy of evidence. Systematic reviews/meta-analyses suggest preliminary or satisfactory clinical evidence for agnus castus (Vitex agnus castus) for premenstrual complaints, flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum) for hypertension, feverfew (Tanacetum partenium) for migraine prevention, ginger (Zingiber officinalis) for pregnancy-induced nausea, ginseng (Panax ginseng) for improving fasting glucose levels as well as phytoestrogens and St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) for the relief of some symptoms in menopause. However, firm conclusions of efficacy cannot be generally drawn. On the other hand, inconclusive evidence of efficacy or contradictory results have been reported for Aloe vera in the treatment of psoriasis, cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) in cystitis prevention, ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) for tinnitus and intermittent claudication, echinacea (Echinacea spp.) for the prevention of common cold and pomegranate (Punica granatum) for the prevention/treatment of cardiovascular diseases. A critical evaluation of the clinical data regarding the adverse effects has shown that herbal remedies are generally better tolerated than synthetic medications. Nevertheless, potentially serious adverse events, including herb-drug interactions, have been described. This suggests the need to be vigilant when using herbal remedies, particularly in specific conditions, such as during pregnancy and in the paediatric population. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

02
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2014) PMID: 24402784 ↗
Antidepressants for smoking cessation.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2014 Meta-Analysis published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 13,728 participants (RR 2.03). Key conclusion: We also included trials comparing different doses, using pharmacotherapy to prevent relapse or re-initiate smoking cessation or to help smokers reduce cigarette consumption.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: There are at least three reasons to believe antidepressants might help in smoking cessation. Firstly, nicotine withdrawal may produce depressive symptoms or precipitate a major depressive episode and antidepressants may relieve these. Secondly, nicotine may have antidepressant effects that maintain smoking, and antidepressants may substitute for this effect. Finally, some antidepressants may have a specific effect on neural pathways (e.g. inhibiting monoamine oxidase) or receptors (e.g. blockade of nicotinic-cholinergic receptors) underlying nicotine addiction. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to assess the effect and safety of antidepressant medications to aid long-term smoking cessation. The medications include bupropion; doxepin; fluoxetine; imipramine; lazabemide; moclobemide; nortriptyline; paroxetine; S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine (SAMe); selegiline; sertraline; St. John's wort; tryptophan; venlafaxine; and zimeledine. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register which includes reports of trials indexed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, and other reviews and meeting abstracts, in July 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomized trials comparing antidepressant medications to placebo or an alternative pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. We also included trials comparing different doses, using pharmacotherapy to prevent relapse or re-initiate smoking cessation or to help smokers reduce cigarette consumption. We excluded trials with less than six months follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data and assessed risk of bias using standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration.The main outcome measure was abstinence from smoking after at least six months follow-up in patients smoking at baseline, expressed as a risk ratio (RR). We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence available in each trial, and biochemically validated rates if available. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis using a fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four new trials were identified since the 2009 update, bri

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing (2025) PMID: 40717256 ↗
The Effects of St. John's Wort on Healing of Stages 1 and 2 Pressure Injuries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing involving n = 48 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The findings of this randomized controlled trial revealed no difference between wound healing outcomes when St' John's wort oil was compared to saline in a group of patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: This purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of topical St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) oil on wound healing in Stages 1 and 2 pressure injuries (PI). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The study was conducted between September 2020 and June 2021 in a nursing home in Istanbul, Turkey. The sample comprised 48 participants: 24 were randomly allocated to the intervention group and 24 individuals to the control group. The intervention was 0.9% NaCl and St. John's wort oil; 0.9% NaCl was administered to control group participants. The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing was used to measure wound healing. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were found when control and intervention groups were evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 3, or 4. CONCLUSION: The findings of this randomized controlled trial revealed no difference between wound healing outcomes when St' John's wort oil was compared to saline in a group of patients. We recommend additional research using various stages and categories of PI to more fully determine the potential effects of topical St. John's wort oil on PI healing.

04
CLINICAL STUDY FP essentials (2021) PMID: 34128628 ↗
Integrative Medicine: Herbal Supplements.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Clinical Study published in FP essentials. Key conclusion: For example, St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) can have significant drug interactions with prescription or over-the-counter drugs.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Various herbal medicines have been used around the world for more than 5,000 years. Herbal medicines, or herbal supplements, are defined as any products originating from plants and used to preserve or recover health. In the United States, the popularity of herbal supplements has increased in the last several decades. Many physicians do not ask patients about herbal supplement use, and one-third of patients do not inform their physician about supplement use. However, physicians should ask, because although many supplements are considered low risk and safe, some have significant risks of adverse effects. For example, St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) can have significant drug interactions with prescription or over-the-counter drugs. The effectiveness of herbal supplements in the management of specific conditions varies. For some conditions, there is robust clinical data supporting the use of specific herbal supplements, but for other conditions there is poor or insufficient data. The content and safety of herbal supplements are the purview of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, the FDA primarily responds to after-the-fact reports of postmarketing safety concerns. When an herbal supplement-related adverse effect is suspected, patients or physicians should report it to the FDA via the MedWatch reporting system. Written permission from the American Academy of Family Physicians is required for reproduction of this material in whole or in part in any form or medium.

05
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of molecular sciences (2020) PMID: 33375664 ↗
Antiproliferative Effects of St. John's Wort, Its Derivatives, and Other Hypericum Species in Hematologic Malignancies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2020 Clinical Study published in International journal of molecular sciences. Key conclusion: Although the in vitro studies appear promising, controlled in vivo studies are necessary before we can hypothesize the introduction of Hypericum and its derivatives into clinical practice for the treatment of hematologic malignancies.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Hypericum is a widely present plant, and extracts of its leaves, flowers, and aerial elements have been employed for many years as therapeutic cures for depression, skin wounds, and respiratory and inflammatory disorders. Hypericum also displays an ample variety of other biological actions, such as hypotensive, analgesic, anti-infective, anti-oxidant, and spasmolytic abilities. However, recent investigations highlighted that this species could be advantageous for the cure of other pathological situations, such as trigeminal neuralgia, as well as in the treatment of cancer. This review focuses on the in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum), its derivatives, and other Hypericum species in hematologic malignancies. Hypericum induces apoptosis in both myeloid and lymphoid cells. Other Hypericum targets include matrix metalloproteinase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and matrix metalloproteinase-9, which are mediators of cell migration and angiogenesis. Hypericum also downregulates the expression of proteins that are involved in the resistance of leukemia cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Finally, Hypericum and its derivatives appear to have photodynamic effects and are candidates for applications in tumor photodynamic therapy. Although the in vitro studies appear promising, controlled in vivo studies are necessary before we can hypothesize the introduction of Hypericum and its derivatives into clinical practice for the treatment of hematologic malignancies.

06
CLINICAL STUDY The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology (2019) PMID: 29411879 ↗
Understanding drug interactions with St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.): impact of hyperforin content.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Clinical Study published in The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that the significance of herb-drug interactions with St John's wort is influenced by the nature of the herbal medicines product, particularly the hyperforin content.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review herb-drug interaction studies with St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) with a focus on the hyperforin content of the extracts used in these studies. METHODS: PUBMED was systematically searched to identify studies describing pharmacokinetic interactions involving St John's wort. Data on study design and the St John's wort extract or product were gathered to extract hyperforin content and daily dose used in interaction studies. KEY FINDINGS: This analysis demonstrates that significant herb-drug interactions (resulting in a substantial change in systemic exposure) with St John's wort products were associated with hyperforin daily dosage. Products that had a daily dose of <1 mg hyperforin were less likely to be associated with major interaction for drugs that were CYP3A4 or p-glycoprotein substrates. Although a risk of interactions cannot be excluded even for low-dose hyperforin St. John's wort extracts, the use of products that result in a dose of not more than 1 mg hyperforin per day is recommended to minimise the risk of interactions. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that the significance of herb-drug interactions with St John's wort is influenced by the nature of the herbal medicines product, particularly the hyperforin content. © 2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology (2017) PMID: 28885074 ↗
Clinical risks of St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) co-administration.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Clinical Study published in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology. Key conclusion: Hyperforin seems to be the major ingredient responsible for CYP and P-gp inducing activity of SJW; thus, hyperforin-free products may be future candidates to decrease SJW's drug interactions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

St. John's wort (SJW) is a common medicinal herb used for the treatment of mild to moderate depression. Hyperforin, one of the chief components of SJW, plays an important role in the induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) and P-glycoprotein transporter (P-gp), and therefore, affects the pharmacokinetics of various drugs. There are several clinical studies demonstrating the interaction of SJW with the metabolism of conventional drugs which may cause life-threatening events. Areas covered: This review focuses on human studies that have evaluated pharmacokinetic alterations of conventional drugs in concomitant use with different SJW preparations. Expert opinion: SJW preparations have demonstrated clinically important interactions with several classes of conventional drugs such as immunosuppressants, anticancer agents, cardiovascular drugs, oral contraceptives, and lipid lowering agents that caused life-threatening events in several cases. The patient information label on the SJW products should provide enough information regarding the possible risk of interaction. Hyperforin seems to be the major ingredient responsible for CYP and P-gp inducing activity of SJW; thus, hyperforin-free products may be future candidates to decrease SJW's drug interactions.

08
CLINICAL STUDY Food and chemical toxicology (2017) PMID: 28755953 ↗
Kidney toxicity related to herbs and dietary supplements: Online table of case reports. Part 3 of 5 series.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Clinical Study published in Food and chemical toxicology. Key conclusion: No longer sold in the United States are chocolate vine or mu tong (Caulis aristolochiae), guang fang ji (Aristolochia fangchi), ma huang (Ephedra sinica), and Tenshi
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: No tabular summary of potentially life-threatening, kidney-toxic dietary supplements (DS; includes herbs) based on PubMed case reports is currently available online and continually updated to forewarn United States consumers, clinicians, and companies manufacturing DS. The purpose of this review was to create an online research summary table of kidney toxicity case reports related to DS. METHODS: Documented PubMed case reports (1966 to May 2016, and cross-referencing) of DS appearing to contribute to kidney toxicity were listed in "DS Toxic Tables." Keywords included "herb" or "dietary supplement" combined with "kidney" to generate an overview list, and possibly "toxicity" to narrow the selection. Case reports were excluded if they involved herb combinations (some exceptions), Chinese herb mixtures, teas of mixed herb contents, mushrooms, poisonous plants, self-harm, excessive doses (except vitamins/minerals), legal or illegal drugs, drug-herbal interactions, and confounders of drugs or diseases. Since commercial DS often include a combination of ingredients, they were treated separately; so were foods. A few foods with kidney-toxic effects were listed in a fourth table. The spectrum of herbal or DS-induced kidney injuries included kidney stones, nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, necrosis, acute kidney injury (AKI; previously known as acute renal failure [ARF]), chronic kidney disease, kidney transplant, and death. RESULTS: Approximately 7 herbs (minus 4 no longer for sale) and 10 dietary supplements (minus 3 excluded due to excessive doses + germanium that is no longer sold) have been related to kidney injury case reports published in PubMed (+crosslisting) in the last 50 + years (1966 to May 2016). The implicated herbs include Chinese yew (Taxus celbica) extract, impila (Callilepis laureola), morning cypress (Cupressus funebris Endl), St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), thundergod vine (Tripterygium wilfordii hook F), tribulus (Tribulus terrestris) and wormwood (Artemisia herba-alba). No longer sold in the United States are chocolate vine or mu tong (Caulis aristolochiae), guang fang ji (Aristolochia fangchi), ma huang (Ephedra sinica), and Tenshi

09
CLINICAL STUDY Farmacia hospitalaria (2017) PMID: 28683711 ↗
[Decreased everolimus blood concentration associated with consumption of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) extract sweets].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2017 Clinical Study published in Farmacia hospitalaria. Key conclusion: [Decreased everolimus blood concentration associated with consumption of St.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

81. Farm Hosp. 2017 Jul 1;41(4):565-566. doi: 10.7399/fh.2017.41.4.10777. [Decreased everolimus blood concentration associated with consumption of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) extract sweets]. [Article in Spanish] Cristóbal Gutiérrez H(1), Martínez Callejo V(2), García de la Paz AM(3), Gómez Gómez D(4), Ochagavía Sufrategui M(5), Valero Domínguez M(6), Colorado Araujo MªLM(7), Vejo Puente E(8). Author information: (1)Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. (2)Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. (3)Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. (4)Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. (5)Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. (6)Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. (7)Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. (8)Servicio de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.. [email protected]. DOI: 10.7399/fh.2017.41.4.10777 PMID: 28683711 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

10
CLINICAL STUDY Current drug metabolism (2015) PMID: 26526838 ↗
Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Herb-drug Interactions in Antiretroviral Therapy.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2015 Clinical Study published in Current drug metabolism. Key conclusion: The knowledge of clinically significant herb-drug interaction will be important in order to avoid herb-induced risk of sub-therapeutic exposure to ARVs (which can lead to viral resistance) or the precipitation of toxicity (which may lead to poor compliance and/or discontinuation
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

For healthcare professionals, the volume of literature available on herb-drug interactions often makes it difficult to separate experimental/potential interactions from those deemed clinically relevant. There is a need for concise and conclusive information to guide pharmacotherapy in HIV/AIDS. In this review, the bases for potential interaction of medicinal herbs with specific antiretroviral drugs are presented, and several botanicals are discussed for which clinically relevant interactions in humans are established. Such studies have provided, in most cases, sufficient ground to warrant the avoidance of concurrent administration of antiretroviral (ARVs) drugs with St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), black pepper (Piper species) and grapefruit juice. Other botanicals that require caution in the use with antiretrovirals include African potato (Hypoxis hemerocallidea), ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba), ginseng (Panax species), garlic (Allium sativum), goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis) and kava kava (Piper methysticum). The knowledge of clinically significant herb-drug interaction will be important in order to avoid herb-induced risk of sub-therapeutic exposure to ARVs (which can lead to viral resistance) or the precipitation of toxicity (which may lead to poor compliance and/or discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy).

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category